A Climate Change? | The New Yorker Comment

From the pages of The New Yorker, this is the Weekly Comment podcast. In A Climate Change, Elisabeth Kolbert writes about climate change and the new age of extinction.

Late last month, Greta Thunberg, the 16 -year -old climate activist from Sweden arrived in New Toonberry, who is sometimes compared to Joan of Arc and sometimes to Pippi Longstocking, doesn't fly.

The emissions from aviation are too high.

So she'd spent two weeks sailing across the Atlantic in a racing boat.

When she reached New York Harbor, she told Trevor Noah on the Daily Show, the first thing she noticed was, suddenly, it smells.

Toonberry doesn't adhere to social niceties.

She's spoken openly about having Asperger's syndrome.

She began her crusade last year sitting outside the Swedish Parliament building in Stockholm, handing out flyers that read, I am doing this because you adults are shitting on my future.

It's a trait particularly well -suited to the cause she's taken up, on no other issue is the gap between what's politically acceptable and what's scientifically necessary wider than it is on climate change.

In an address to the French Parliament in July, Tunbery put it this way.

Maybe you are simply not mature enough to tell it like it is, because even that burden you leave to us children.

We become the bad guys who have to tell people these uncomfortable things because no one else wants to or dares to.

Toonberry had come to New York to address world leaders at the United Nations Climate Action Summit.

The summit's stated goal is to rapidly accelerate action to implement the Paris Agreement, which was negotiated in 2015.

Under the Paris Agreement, just about every country on Earth pledged to hold the increase in the global average temperature to well below 2 degrees Celsius—3 .6 degrees Fahrenheit—and to try to hold it to 1 .5 degrees Celsius.

But as Toonberry patiently explained on The Daily Show, citing last year's special report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate change.

The window for meeting these targets is closing fast. To have a two -thirds chance of holding the increase to 1 .5 degrees celsius, the signatories of the Paris Agreement would collectively have to limit future carbon dioxide emissions to roughly 350 billion tons.

Since global emissions are now running at about 40 billion tons a year, this gives the world less than a decade until, as Toonberry observed, that budget is gone.

The first global conclave on climate change was held in Geneva in 1979, when Thunberg's mother, Malina Ernmann, was eight years old.

A few years ago, Thunberg persuaded Ernmann, an internationally renowned opera singer, to give up flying, which meant that she also gave up her international career.

The first treaty on the problem, the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change, went into effect in 1994, nearly a decade before Thunberg was born.

It soon became clear that the treaty was ineffective, and so it was amended with the Kyoto Protocol, which entered into force in 2005 when Thunberg was a toddler.

The Paris agreement, it's now evident, is also woefully inadequate.

A potluck supper of a pact, it asks each country to contribute its own emissions reduction target.

According to Climate Action Tracker, an independent research group, Only two nations, Morocco and Gambia, have set targets consistent with holding the world's fever to 1 .5 degrees Celsius.

Five others have set targets consistent with 2 degrees.

All the rest have targets that are insufficient, highly insufficient or critically insufficient.

Into this last category falls the United States.

With less than 5 % of the world's population, this nation is responsible for more than 25 % of cumulative emissions.

On an annual basis, it's the world's second largest emitter after China.

To accommodate the US's unfortunate politics on the issue, the Paris Agreement was not officially designated a treaty.

This allowed the Obama administration to bypass Congress when it drew up its admittedly insufficient targets.

The Trump administration, of course, has said that it will withdraw from the agreement and has been systematically reversing whatever progress had been made.

Last month, the Environmental Protection Agency announced that it was loosening the rules on methane leaks from oil and gas operations.

As a greenhouse gas, methane is many times more potent than CO2.

Last week, the administration moved to revoke California's authority to set its own tailpipe pollution standards, an authority that the state was granted by Congress in 1967.

Are the politics of climate change in America changing?

There are positive signs.

Earlier Earlier this month, the top ten candidates for the Democratic presidential nomination participated in a CNN town hall on the issue, according to The Times.

This was the first such primetime event in history.

A recent Washington Post poll found that more than three -quarters of Americans now consider climate change a crisis or a major problem.

A survey conducted this summer of voters in Texas showed that even in the oil patch, a majority are concerned about climate change.

Toonberry's actions have inspired hundreds of thousands of young people around the globe to stage school strikes for climate action.

Ahead of the strike called for the eve of the climate summit.

The New York City school system said it would excuse students who skipped classes.

Toonberry was set to speak to the strikers in Foley Square.

Still, you'd have to ignore most of the past 40 years to conclude that action is imminent.

The same post poll showed that rising concern about warming indicated continuing resistance to doing much about it.

Fewer than half of those surveyed said that they'd support a $2 -a -month surcharge on their electricity bills.

And only a third would support a $0 .10 per gallon increase on the federal gasoline tax.

Much has been written in the past few weeks about the importance of remaining hopeful.

Without hope, the argument goes, there is no hope.

In any event, giving up isn't an option.

Blow past 1 .5 or 2 degrees Celsius and there's the prospect of 2 .5 or 3 or 4 or even more to worry about.

New climate models unveiled the other day in France suggest that if emissions continue unabated, by 2100, global temperatures could rise beyond a beyond apocalyptic 7 degrees.

At no point will it cease to matter how much carbon goes into the air and how much stays in the ground.

Once again, Greta Thunberg has put it best. People sometimes ask me if I'm an optimist or a pessimist, she said in a recent interview.

I am a realist. As for hope, that is something you need to deserve, that you have actually done something.

That was A Climate Change by Elizabeth Colbert, from The New Yorker magazine's issue for September 30th, 2019.

Narrated by Kristy Burns.

Audible .com produces a weekly audio edition of The New Yorker.

To subscribe or to download individual issues, we invite you to go to www .audible .com and enter New Yorker in the search box.

To subscribe to the comment podcast, go to www .newyorker .com or to the New Yorker room on the iTunes store.

[The Climate Realist: Greta Thunberg and the Urgency of Global Action]-[A Climate Change?]

📋 Summary

The Climate Realist: Greta Thunberg and the Urgency of Global Action

The Unfiltered Voice of a Generation

The Mathematical Reality of the Paris Agreement

The Failure of National Commitments

The Paradox of Public Sentiment

Beyond Hope: The Path of Realism

🎯Key Sentences

📝Key Phrases

📖 Transcript