In the modern era of customer service, the experience of being "put on hold" while waiting for assistance has become a ubiquitous annoyance. However, behind the simple frustration of waiting in a queue lies a significant economic and technological shift. As artificial intelligence (AI) begins to take over roles traditionally held by humans, the global call centre industry—which employs approximately 17 million people—finds itself at a crossroads.
The job of a call centre agent is inherently high-pressure. Agents are frequently tasked with managing interactions with customers who are "aggravated" and "yelling" down the phone. According to Mylene Caballona, president of the Call Centre Workers Union BIEN, the primary challenge is to "pacify" these clients—effectively calming them down while simultaneously resolving their concerns. This work carries a heavy burden of "mental stress," compounded by the fact that agents are constantly being "monitored by an AI" to evaluate their performance.
A central concern for workers in regions like the Philippines and India is the looming shadow of automation. Mylene highlights that the integration of AI is not merely a supportive tool but a precursor to potential job loss. She notes that "as a matter of fact"—a phrase used to emphasize the gravity and validity of her claim—studies suggest that roughly 300,000 workers, or about 27% of the workforce, could be "displaced" by AI technologies in the "near future." This term, signifying that these changes will occur within a short time, underscores the urgent anxiety felt by employees who fear they will be replaced by automated systems.
Despite the rapid advancement of technology, Mylene argues that AI lacks a fundamental human quality: empathy. To be "empathetic" is to possess the ability to put oneself in another person's position and share their feelings or experiences. Mylene points out that humans are naturally more "compassionate" than robots. When a customer is distressed, the mechanical nature of a machine or robot cannot replicate the genuine human connection required to truly soothe an angry client. This distinction remains the strongest argument for the continued necessity of human agents in the customer service sector.
Interestingly, the stress of the job often manifests in the way agents speak. During interviews, Mylene frequently employs "filler words" such as "you know," "um," and "ah." These linguistic markers are essential tools for speakers, providing them with time to think, process complex information, or express uncertainty during an intense conversation. While these fillers are often viewed as simple speech habits, in the context of a high-stakes interview about the future of one's livelihood, they reflect the cognitive load and emotional weight carried by those on the front lines of the service industry.
As the call centre industry evolves, the tension between efficiency and humanity becomes increasingly apparent. While AI offers the promise of streamlined operations and technological advancement, the human element—characterized by empathy and compassion—remains a critical component of effective service. Whether the industry will fully transition to AI or find a hybrid model remains to be seen, but the voices of workers like Mylene serve as a vital reminder of the human cost behind every automated phone queue.