Fordham University, under the leadership of President Tanya Tetlo, serves a diverse community of approximately 17,000 students and 750 faculty members. The institution is defined by its two distinct campuses in New York City—one in the Bronx at Rose Hill and the other at Lincoln Center in Manhattan. These campuses, separated by roughly nine miles, sit in close geographic proximity to Columbia University, a site that became a focal point for intense, high-profile protests this past spring. This geographical closeness serves as a metaphor for the interconnectedness of global pain and local campus dynamics.
President Tetlo emphasizes that the campus environment during the recent geopolitical tensions was defined by deep, personal pain. She notes that the community includes students from Palestine who are “going through all the stages of grief and trauma” due to their inability to reach family members, as well as Jewish and Israeli students who suffered the loss of family members on October 7th. Tetlo’s approach to leadership in this climate is rooted in empathy, stating that she views it as an “honor” to provide a space for students to express their frustration, even if that means being the target of their outrage, acknowledging that these students often feel “so powerless.”
Throughout the spring, Tetlo observed a commendable effort by many student activists to engage in “prayer vigils,” “teachings,” and constructive dialogue. She highlights that these students “engaged with complexity” and sought to express their outrage without defaulting to “yelling at the nearest authority figure” or disrupting the educational rights of their peers. This distinction between productive advocacy and the disruption of the “right of their fellow students to learn” represents a core challenge for university administration.
Despite these efforts, tensions escalated following the police clearing of Hamilton Hall at Columbia University. This event served as a catalyst for a group of students at Fordham’s Manhattan campus to initiate an encampment within a classroom building. While the administration successfully persuaded most students to leave, the university was ultimately forced to involve the police, leading to the arrest of “about 15 mostly students” on “minor misdemeanors.” Tetlo describes this moment as “painful,” highlighting the inherent difficulty in navigating the tension between the rights of the broader student body to proceed with “finals” and the rights of a smaller group of students to “express themselves” through protest.
Reflecting on the broader political climate, Tetlo discusses her father’s influence—a psychologist who famously kept a sign on his desk reading, “question authority but politely and with respect.” When asked if the campus protests met this standard, Tetlo suggests that, for the most part, the engagement was constructive. She notes that the administration “met with student activists” and found them to be “profound” in their approach. This suggests a leadership philosophy that prioritizes open channels of communication and mutual respect as the primary tools for maintaining the integrity of the academic environment, even when facing significant political and emotional turbulence.