Many high-performing professionals, particularly introverted leaders, often find themselves in a frustrating position: they deliver accurate work and provide thorough updates, yet their ideas fail to gain traction. As Laura Camacho, an executive presence strategist, explains in this episode of Speak Up, the issue is rarely a lack of competence. Instead, it is a failure to be "interesting" enough to command influence. Being brilliant does not automatically translate to being influential; to bridge that gap, one must move beyond merely grabbing attention toward building genuine trust.
Camacho clarifies that being "interesting" is not about being flashy, performative, or self-centered. Rather, it is about being useful. In a corporate environment where decision-makers are constantly overwhelmed by "decisions, pressures, priorities, and politics," the person who makes things "more clear, faster, and easier" becomes a source of relief. By reducing the cognitive effort required by your audience, you inherently build trust. The goal is to be just 1% more interesting to facilitate better thinking among your peers and superiors.
To achieve this 1% increase in influence, Camacho proposes three fundamental shifts in how you approach everyday work conversations:
Most professionals fall into the trap of "reporting out," which involves listing completed tasks and the steps taken to achieve them. This is passive and often leaves the listener asking, "Okay, now what?" Trusted leaders, conversely, act as guides. They synthesize the analysis and provide a clear recommendation. For example, instead of just detailing a cost analysis, a guide states, "This analysis shows that we can reduce costs by 12%. I recommend we act this quarter because of A and B." This transforms raw information into actionable utility.
Many professionals choose neutrality to minimize risk, fearing that their superiors have more expertise. However, Camacho argues that "facts do not build trust; insight does." Being specific is what she calls "terrific." Rather than stating a vague, neutral observation like "we are seeing delays," an insightful communicator identifies the specific bottleneck and explains how fixing it can recover two weeks of time. Your job is not to provide more information, but to make the decision-making process easier for your team.
Passive participation—such as simply agreeing with a colleague—is better than silence, but it does little to move a conversation forward. Camacho advocates for the "affirm and add" technique. By acknowledging a colleague's point and then contributing a unique perspective or identifying a potential risk (e.g., "The biggest risk I’m seeing with what she proposed is the timing"), you provide value that justifies your seat at the table. This is a subtle but powerful way to demonstrate leadership.
You do not need a "personality transplant" to become more influential. It is simply a matter of increasing your intentionality. Camacho suggests a simple filtering exercise to use before any meeting:
By reframing your identity—for instance, changing "I work in finance" to "I help companies avoid expensive mistakes before they happen"—you shift the focus from your job title to your impact. Ultimately, being remembered is the first step, but being trusted is what secures a promotion. By focusing on being more useful, insightful, and clear, you position yourself as a leader who doesn't just deliver data, but drives business outcomes.