Good morning from The Financial Times, today is Wednesday June 11th and this is your FT News Briefing.
The UK will lay out its spending plan for the next couple of years, and Citigroup is getting ready for some hard times ahead.
Plus US state and local governments are selling municipal bonds like they're going out of style.
We'll tell you why.
I'm Mark Filippino and here's the news you need to start your day.
UK Chancellor, Rachel Reeves, sets out the Labour government's budget for the next few years today.
Funds for the UK's public services have been squeezed hard recently and some government departments will face even more pressure after today's spending review.
Here to tell us what to look out for is the FT's political editor, George Parker.
Hey, George. Hi there.
All right. So for me and my non -British friends out there, can you tell me a little bit more about what the spending review is?
is how does it differ from say the autumn budget or the spring statement that we just saw earlier this year?
Okay, well, the autumn budget or spring statements were events where the government changed its spending plans.
What the spending review is is an allocation of what's known as the spending envelope.
So in other words, the government has already said how much money it's going to spend over the next three or four years.
The spending review is the moment when the chancellor of the exchequer announces how that money, how that cake is going to be split up between different government departments and through the choices Rachel Reeves makes today we will see the government's priorities.
I like that cake metaphor George.
Let's play on that a little bit.
Who are going to get bigger slices?
Who are going to get smaller slices?
Who are the winners and losers of this thing?
The big choices that Keir Starmer and Rachel Reeves has made is to support two big public spending areas in particular.
First is defense that we all know about.
Huge pressure on European countries to take on the threat posed by Russia and the possible withdrawal of US military support.
The second big area inevitably is the National Health Service, which is creaking at the seams under pressure from an aging population.
So the areas which have been protesting most about this whole process are the Home Office, which pays for policing and border security.
The second area will be the local government department, which pays for all the local services that people use, including childcare and adult social care along with things like rubbish bin collections and all the rest of it so I think those are two areas which are going to be particularly tightly squeezed.
Yeah and how does Reeves' own party, the ruling Labour Party, feel about the review that you just laid out and its priorities?
Well the Labour Party thinks it wasn't elected to impose cuts on public services or indeed cuts on welfare so there's a lot of anxiety about this so a lot of what we'll see later today, will be Rachel Reeves allocating some of the £113 billion to projects which she thinks will benefit the wider economy.
So that might be new roads, new railways, new nuclear power stations, green energy projects, housing, things like that.
And that money will be distributed across the country.
So she'll be hoping that will give the Labour Party and voters a bit of a feel good factor against a backdrop of a very tight settlement on day to day spending.
George, why is the UK government facing such a tight budget squeeze to begin with, and what are they gonna do about it?
Well, they would say they inherited a very difficult fiscal situation from the previous governments, conservative government.
Basically, a huge amount of debt was accumulated dealing with, first of all, the COVID crisis and then the energy crisis as well.
A lot of government spending now is taken up by the servicing of its debt levels.
That's been exacerbated by rising borrowing costs for governments across the world, not just in Britain.
So as a result, the budget is very tightly constrained.
Rachel Reeves has a budget rule which says that day to day spending should be met by tax receipts by the end of the forecast period, which is at the end of the parliament.
What she's hoping is that the markets will see the borrowing she's undertaken to pay for capital investment as a long term bet on Britain's future, and one which will eventually increase the growth rate of the economy and then create a virtuous feedback loop and create more money for day -to -day public services.
Soterios Johnson George, I guess the big question on everyone's mind is, are we going to see higher taxes in the UK because of this?
I mean what are what are you looking out for?
Georgeips I think the answer, similar to that question, is yes.
Rachel Reeves had a huge tax raising budget last October.
She said this was required to fill a black hole in the public finances.
But as I just mentioned, the fiscal situation is still pretty difficult.
The pressure's mounting on her.
So when it comes to the autumn budget, the next big fiscal event where she will announce tax changes.
There's a growing expectation among economists that she will have to come back and raise taxes again.
If I was a wealthy person, I might expect the Chancellor to come knocking on my door looking for a bit more tax revenue in the autumn.
Soterios Johnson That's the FTS' George Parker in London.
Thanks so much, George.
George Parker Pleasure.
The UK and four other western countries are imposing sanctions on two Israeli ultra -nationalist officials, Finance Minister Belzahlil Smotrich and National Security Minister Itamar Ben -Gevir.
UK Foreign Secretary David Lamy said Smotrich and Ben -Gevir have quote incited extremist violence and serious abuses of Palestinian human rights.
The UK Other restrictions include a freeze on accessing assets in the country and a ban on travelling to Britain.
The other countries placing sanctions on Israel include Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and Norway.
These are the first western sanctions against Israeli government ministers, and Israel's foreign minister called the sanctions outrageous on Tuesday and vowed to respond.
Meanwhile, the U .S. is taking a different stance.
America's ambassador to Israel, Mike Huckabee, said he didn't think an independent Palestinian state was still a goal of American foreign policy.
Municipal bonds are moving like hotcakes.
US state and local governments are selling them at record rates and it's president Donald Trump's budget legislation.
You know, the big, beautiful bill that's driving the pace.
It all has to do with a certain tax break.
Here to explain is the FT's Acting Capital Markets correspondent Will Schmidt.
Hey Will. Hey, good morning.
So Will, tell me what's going on here?
How is Donald Trump's big beautiful bill influencing the municipal bond market?
Okay, so within the muni bond market, there is a thing called a private activity bond, which is financed with the help of state and local governments, but it's not like pledging their assets as collateral.
It's used instead to build private projects that have some public benefits.
so think of like airports, but not airplanes, or hospitals, but not liquor stores, or affordable housing, but not golf courses.
These private activity bonds benefit from a tax break that makes exempt the interest paid on those bonds.
In 2017, when a reconciliation bill much like the big beautiful bill was passing through Congress, some lawmakers tried to get rid of that tax break for private activity bonds.
So there's concern in the muni market these days that this could happen again and that tax break could go away.
Will, paint me a picture here.
Why would the loss of this provision suddenly be driving up the sale of municipal bonds?
Because I'm not quite making the connection.
Sure. So let's say you want to build an airport, you know the Marc Livino Airport, and you would like to work with your local county or state or city government to do so.
In the past, you were able to get a better deal on the debt you had to borrow by doing private activity bond.
If that tax break goes away, that becomes a less feasible option and maybe not feasible at all and you'll have to go to the public markets to borrow this debt and it could be a lot more expensive.
First of all, I just want to thank you for the Mark Filipino Airport.
That really gave me a JEKL.
Yeah, you're welcome.
We mentioned that this is causing a rally.
Just how big of a rally are we seeing in municipal bond sales because of this threat?
So municipal bonds in the U .S. are actually on pace for their best year ever.
The reason this is driving up sales as quickly as it is is because municipalities and their private partners worried about the loss of this potential tax break or trying to pull forward some of the projects they plan for later in the year, early next year, those are starting to get funded earlier.
JS So they can get the ball rolling here, right?
RS So, they can get it done before the tax break goes away.
JS Okay. So, Will, you mentioned that this tax break was at risk back in 2017, but was ultimately saved, how likely is it that Congress will scrap it now?
So from what I can tell the muni market was really put off guard in 2017, you know words like shocked and confused and chaos were thrown around when I was talking to folks about it.
This time having had that experience they are a lot better prepared and they've been doing a little more advocacy behind the scenes ahead of time.
This vibe is that the danger is less than it was in 2017 but because we have really accelerated timeline you know I think president Trump wants to get this bill to him by July 4th so there still is some concern until that bill is signed, sealed, and delivered.
Yeah, and I think part of the concern is that congressional Republicans are under this pressure to find ways to limit how much the budget bill adds to the national debt.
What's at stake here for local municipalities if this tax break is added to the chopping block?
Well, that's a good question.
They can still build fire stations.
They can still build highways, parking garages, anything you would think of when you drive around a city and you see features that are not privately owned, but it could mean that it takes longer and is more expensive for those kinds of projects to get built.
And because those projects do have some public benefit, that could hurt, you know, the overall tenor of municipalities.
That's the FT's Will Schmidt in New York.
Thanks Will. Thanks Mark.
Before we go, Citigroup is bracing for some bad news.
The US Bank said yesterday that it's ready to beef up its provisions for potential bad loans.
and not buy a little, buy a lot.
Hundreds of millions of dollars in the second quarter.
So, why does Citi expect so many people to struggle with their loans?
Well, a big reason is that people are worried about President Donald Trump's tariffs, that his policies will slow economic growth and raise prices for consumers, and we're already starting to see people hunker down.
Consumer sentiment is improving, yeah, but it's still way below what it was when Trump was elected last year.
You can read more on all these stories for free when you click the links in our show notes.
This has been your daily FT News briefing.
check back tomorrow for the latest business news.
amount of change impacting the UK waste market.
And Salvatore Lombardo, CPTO at Cooper.
If you want to do forecasting, how can you do this if you don't have visibility?
You can listen to the full episode of The Next Five wherever you get your podcasts.
The latest episode of The Next Five is all about cross -border payments.
I speak with Pratik Khawala at Mastercard. The estimated market size for 2024, it's around 195 trillion.
Emanuella Saccarola at Citi.
There are about 20 ,000 combinations and each combination has its challenges.
And Josh Gordon -Blake at MoneyGram.
The latest market today is estimated between $600 and $700 billion.
Listen to the full episode of The Next 5 wherever you get your podcasts.
Enjoy.
