This message comes from U.S.
Bank.
Simplify how you do business with business.
Essentials a powerful combination of no monthly maintenance fee checking and card payment processing.
Deposit products are offered by U.S.
Bank National Association, member FDIC.
Hey, short wavers.
Emily Kwong here.
I have a confession.
We read every single review that you leave us on Apple Podcasts, on Spotify, on whatever platform you use.
We can't make this show without you.
You are our other half.
You are our soulmate.
You are the reason we get up in the morning.
And we kind of need to know what you think of the show in order to do our job well.
So get yourself over to your podcasting platform.
Leave us a review.
Put into words what this show means to you so that other people can find it.
Thanks.
OK, here's the show.
You're listening to Shortwave from NPR.
Most people in the U.S. now have access to some form of legal weed.
But depending on the state, people could potentially be exposed to hidden health risks.
Science journalist Teresa Carr did a whole investigation into this.
I'm really interested at the intersection of science and society.
Teresa was reporting a story about medical marijuana use when she met Oklahoma resident Summer Parker, a medical marijuana sales and marketing professional who has Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome, a disorder that affects the connective tissue inside and often causes serious chronic pain.
And she became addicted to opioids that were prescribed by her doctor for her pain.
And she found that cannabis was both the way to help her overcome that addiction and it also helps assuage her pain.
But a couple years ago, she and her partner Charles Arbina started having unexplained health issues.
Summer had fainting episodes and stroke-like symptoms.
Charles, who had a history of migraines, suddenly they became unrelenting.
He had to be hospitalized.
He lost feeling in the side of his face.
The doctors didn't have any real explanation for what was going on.
When Charles' doctor suggested their weed could be contaminated, the couple dismissed it.
All legal products have to go through a testing process and they get a certificate of analysis or COA that says it's, you know, free of all these contaminants.
And, you know, here's the chemical analysis of it.
This is the THC profile.
And THC, we should say, is short for tetrahydrocannabinol, the chemical responsible for most of cannabis's psychological effects.
So in a feature article Teresa wrote for Undarkorg, she explains that the cannabis plant is good at sucking up things from the environment.
Research has shown it could be a tool for environmental cleanup of pesticides and heavy metals.
But this special quality can also bring downsides.
For instance, when Summer and Charles got some of the marijuana products they were using tested... To their horror, they discovered that they were contaminated with both mold and some pesticides, and that those pesticides were associated with some neurotoxicity.
Today on the show how patchy weed regulations have failed to keep up with consumption and how it could be harming people's health.
I'm Regina Barber, and you're listening to Shortwave, a science podcast from NPR.
So you can try it yourself.
Just go to linkedin.com slash NPR pod.
That's linkedin.com slash NPR pod.
Terms and conditions apply.
Only on LinkedIn ads.
No stock answers.
No hold music.
Visit Sierra.ai to learn more.
We're talking to independent health and science journalist, Teresa Carr, about patchy weed regulations across the US.
We also have our own pharmaceuticals.
Correspondent who's reported on this topic as well Sydney Lupkin.
Hey, Sydney.
Hey.
So, Sydney, like marijuana is now legal in some form in many states.
What's the difference on how weed is regulated versus like, how pharmaceuticals are regulated in the US?
?
Yeah, it is super, super different.
And that's because weed on the federal level is illegal.
Pharmaceuticals, on the other hand, have to be approved by the Food and Drug Administration based on a very detailed process involving clinical trials and inspections to verify safety and efficacy.
With weed.
That robust federal system is not there, which means that the states are basically having to figure this all out on their own and stand up their own.
Many FDAs and many EPAs.
And they do have a group that they have sort of formed together called CANRA, which is basically a way for state regulators to communicate from state to state with one another, to share data and what's working and what's not working.
But that has its limitations because the standards are still kind of a patchwork.
Yeah.
I mean, this brings us back to Teresa, the story in Oklahoma with Summer and Charles.
You know, they got their weed tested and you said that they found mold, they found other things.
Was it that weed that was causing their health issues?
There's no way to know for sure.
You can't prove cause and effect.
One thing they did tell me is that when they stopped using that weed and switched to another brand, the problems that they had dissipated.
So that's all you can say.
They feel strongly that the two are correlated.
And this wasn't just a one-time thing in Oklahoma.
You wrote in your article about a testing lab manager, Jeffrey Havard, who tested 20 off-the-shelf marijuana joints there.
So what did he find when he did all that testing?
He found that most of them were tainted with mold, and two of them actually had salmonella.
He also found that about three-fourths of them, you know, overstated the THC level which is, as we discovered, fairly common.
So, Teresa, does that mean that, like, the state's regulatory system for weed in that case failed?
One could say that.
So, you know, there are contaminated products, you know, reaching the shelf.
So from that perspective you could say that the regulatory framework just isn't working to keep all the products that consumers are using and buying at dispensaries to keep those products clean.
Okay.
So you reported on how people who produce the weed have to arrange their own testing.
Like, how has that affected the industry?
So I talked to people across the industry growers, lab managers regulators, activists and one thing that kept coming up was this issue of perverse incentives that encourage fraud.
So you can see that pattern repeated over and over and over again.
When a state legalizes marijuana, there's this big rush.
A lot of people get into the industry.
There's competition.
It makes things tough.
And now at this point, growers are struggling.
So they need every single crop to pass.
It's very important or they go out of business.
And, generally speaking, their products are going to be much more profitable for them if they have a higher THC level.
So the higher THC level, the more it sells for.
So producers pay labs to test their products.
And my investigation for undocorg found that producers will choose labs that are looser about passing products for contaminants and that will give them higher THC levels.
The flip side of that is that labs that are strict about their standards are going to lose business.
You also looked at Oregon's regulations.
Why did you look into that state in particular?
And like, what did you learn?
I was really interested in Oregon for two reasons.
One they had recently opened a state testing lab, which kind of is a new trend among state regulators.
So there was that.
And there was also their regulatory body had recently cracked down on several labs for THC inflation.
In fact, most of their labs in the state they cracked down on for THC inflation.
So it seemed a place to go where the regulators were actually taking some action and trying to do something about the problems that we were talking about.
And Sydney, you visited California to see how like it was regulating its huge weed industry.
Like what's going on there?
Yeah.
So state officials had been doing this like across several different state agencies.
But a few years ago, they consolidated into the DCC, which is their Department of Cannabis Control.
And they're basically tracking almost every step in the cannabis pipeline.
Like every plant has a tag and an ID and it gets logged into a database.
Like weed manufacturers even have to report how many pounds of like plant trimmings they throw away.
Wow.
The labs have sort of had to keep up with this really interesting and creative industry, where one day they're like oh well, now we've got THC popcorn on the shelves.
How do you test that?
And they've got to figure it out.
And that isn't to say that DCC is doing everything perfectly because –
It's not.
There was some reporting by the LA Times that there were still pesticides in the legal weed products, particularly in the vapes.
So the department is evolving and trying to respond to that.
And it's definitely upped its testing and enforcement in the last few years.
So in 2024, there were over 60 weed recalls.
And then this year, they've already had 80 weed recalls.
And it's only October.
And they've taken 10 actions against Labrador. so far this year.
So more testing might mean more recalls or more recalls may mean more contaminants.
We don't know at this point.
Let's talk about another study.
So, Teresa and Sydney, you both talked to Maxwell Lung, assistant professor at Arizona State University, who did a study in 2022 about like that patchwork of cannabis regulations.
Sydney, what did that report find?
Yeah, so he said that there were over 600 contaminants that were regulated across the 30 states that had legalized cannabis at that time.
But in each state, there were only between 60 and 120 contaminants that were being regulated.
So in other words, different states were looking for different contaminants.
I also asked Lung whether states testing for just more contaminants maybe had safer weed.
And he said no.
Wow.
Because the research about how these contaminants in weed affect your health when you inhale them, for instance, it's not really well studied.
So a state that might be testing for 300 things might not be testing for the one thing that is guaranteed to give you cancer someday.
And a state only testing for a few contaminants might in fact be testing for that very bad thing.
But without that research which is hard because weed is still federally illegal it's really hard to know what the worst contaminants are.
Yeah, Teresa, is there anything you want to add to that?
The experts I talk to, including Max, are most concerned with inhaling the contaminants because, as opposed to going through your GI tract, this is going the vape or the smoke is going directly into your lungs and then it gets directly into your bloodstream.
And when you think about it like, let's say, you're eating an apple well, you can wash the apple and if there's anything on it you know you can take it at least off the outside, but you don't wash your weed.
And we really don't know how those inhaled contaminants are going to get into your system and affect you.
Wow.
Okay.
Teresa, you wrote in your article about how these contaminants could affect lungs.
Like how are mold and other things affecting people's health?
So when you think about mold, it's everywhere.
And most forms are fairly harmless.
But there are a few forms that can cause serious health problems to humans, especially if you inhale them.
And so that's one of the areas experts are most concerned about.
And that's the idea that somebody, especially somebody with a compromised immune system, might inhale one of these toxic molds.
And there have been case reports of people becoming seriously ill with pneumonia and serious lung respiratory problems from that.
The other thing that scientists are worried about are heavy metals and pesticides that are toxic to the nervous system.
For example, there's a type of pesticides that's commonly used in cannabis called organophosphates.
It's a class of pesticides.
And research has linked that to the onset and faster progression of Parkinson's disease, which is really a concern because a lot of Parkinson's I think something like 40 of Parkinson's patients use cannabis to help with their symptoms of the disease.
Wow.
So Teresa, for consumers then who choose to partake, is there advice for them that you would give after doing all this reporting?
So products that don't pass in the legal market are often funneled into the illicit market.
So when you buy illicit weed, you may be actually getting something that failed for mold, heavy metals or pesticides.
So my best advice I can give to people, even though it's imperfect, is to go to a dispensary and get a product through the legal market that has been through some sort of testing.
Yeah, I definitely want to echo that.
I talked to a weed cultivator who went from the illegal market to the legal one and he described it as this sort of wild wild west.
And this guy was like yeah, there used to be just a guy in a room spraying pesticides, with the door closed and no protective gear.
And that just doesn't fly in the legal market.
So, you know, if you care about the people who are growing your weed, it's nice to go legal.
And then, just if you're trying to be safer for you, it's a good idea to familiarize yourself with what your state regulations are and to regularly check recall lists, which are often published online.
I think that that would be a good idea.
Teresa, Sydney, thank you so much for talking with me today.
Thank you.
Thank you.
This episode was produced by Burleigh McCoy, edited by Viet Le, and fact-checked by Tyler Jones.
The audio engineer was Robert Rodriguez.
Beth Donovan is our senior director.
I'm Regina Barber.
Thank you for listening to Shortwave from NPR.
I'm sorry that you weren't here, because Father Sager was here visiting and he found a very nice orphanage for you.
And I said, but I'm not an orphan.
Surprising stories in your podcast feed, This American Life.
In the U.S., national security news can feel far away from daily life.
Distant wars, murky conflicts, diplomacy behind closed doors.
On our new show Sources and Methods.
NPR reporters on the ground bring you stories of real people, helping you understand why distant events matter here at home.
Listen to Sources and Methods on the NPR app or wherever you get your podcasts.
Across the country, states and counties are rushing to to change their voting rules.
Stacey Abrams says these attacks on voting rights are part of the authoritarian playbook.
You may not be into politics, but politics is into you and it is a stalker.
Listen to Code Switch in the NPR app or wherever you get your podcasts.
