Hello and welcome to World Today.
I am Dinghen in Beijing.
Coming up, China has vowed to counter Donald Trump's unilateral bullying tariffs.
Israel announces expansion of military campaigns and operations in Gaza to seize large areas of land.
Boeing's CEO admits to mistakes on safety after being grilled by the US Senate.
And an American influencer's China visit is challenging misperceptions of China.
To listen to this episode again or catch upon a previous episode, you can download our podcast by searching World Today.
China has voiced strong opposition to Washington's so -called reciprocal tariffs, vying to take countermeasures.
China's Ministry of Commerce has described the U .S. tariffs as a typical bullying practice based on unilateral assessments.
China is urging the U .S. to resolve differences with its trading partners through dialogue and consultation.
U .S. President Donald Trump on Wednesday signed an executive order to slap new tariffs on America's global trading partners despite widespread opposition.
His announcement is adding 34 % tariffs to the existing 20 % duties on all Chinese goods shipped to the United States.
Joining us now on the line are Professor Chu Chiang from Menzhu University of China, as well as Mr. Ina Tangan, Senior Fellow with the Taihe Institute.
Thank you very much for joining us, Ina Tangan and Professor Chu Chiang.
First of all, Aina, do you agree that the so -called reciprocal tariffs announced by Trump are bullying practices based on unilateral assessments?
Yeah, well, that was the position of the foreign ministry.
I agree, it is a patent on bullying, but there's another way of looking at it.
This is the biggest economic gamble by any president if the U .S. went off the gold standard. And you know what I mean by that is Trump is betting that he can keep the dollar high at the same time that he imposed these tariffs.
And this goes against gravity.
If he doesn't, the world is going to call his bluff because if it stays, if it just stays neutral, all right, there's no increase in terms of the dollar.
He needs a 10 percent increase in essence to make sure that there's no harm to the U .S. economy, it still would affect global demand.
If it stays as it is, the effect is going to be somewhere between 2 and 10 percent inflation.
If it goes up by 20 percent, it's going to be somewhere around 22 to 30 percent.
If it went up above that, you're talking about 32 to 40 percent.
If it went 30 percent, and that means the dollar devalued by 30 percent.
that's what I'm talking about.
It would be 42 % to 50 % inflation.
This would in essence end the U .S. economy as we know it until there was a sharp change.
So this is a big bluff by him.
We'll see if the countries gather together and coordinate their responses.
If they do, this will be very short -lived.
So, Professor Shui, going to you, a 54 % minimum tariff on China is higher than the earlier expectation by many analysts, actually.
Do you think this will fundamentally reshape the trade ties, the trade relations between the U .S. and China after decades of interdependence?
Well, I think, yes, it does.
Well, one thing to correct is that the number one is not 54%.
This is 54 % to start with but considering actually from the first administration of the Trump Act and also continuously being going on in Biden's administration, which didn't cancel that tariff to start with.
So we're looking at actually another 19 .6 % of the tariff to begin with.
And now this is another 54, so basically we're looking at averagely about 72 % of the tariffs.
And if you were talking about some special area, for example, like the car or the car parts or like the aluminum or the steel industry raw materials in the sectors.
So basically, for those sectors, the tariff has already been went through the roof as more than 100%.
So, that is basically, it's not going to only, you know, reshape the trade relation or production relation between America and China, but I mean, this is a major reshift, or the reboost of the whole world supply chain.
Everything will be changed.
Well, just take a look at the, well, China, we have already been prepared for that.
Even, we didn't prepare to be that worse, but we get prepared.
Actually, since 1918, when Trump first mentioned about this de -coupling, we get prepared, we know this is going to happen.
But I think who is not getting prepared is ASEAN nations, the European Union, who consider themselves as an alliance to America, or at least a neutral zone to all this geopolitical conflict or so or something.
but now they have to face sometimes even higher tariffs, more than China.
For example, like Indonesia.
For example, like my economy of Vietnam, or even little economy like Laos, or some very loyal trade partner and political partners in West Europe, they're all going to suffer from it.
So, which means in the whole world right now, there is no safe zone already.
Just take a look on their list by Trump.
This showed on the Large League Table.
He showed during the speech there is a island near the Antarctic.
It's called the Heard in the McDonald Island, where only the residents here, there is the penguins.
They also get charged 10 % of the tariffs.
So it shows that in this whole world, there's no safe zone anymore.
That's the reason why I think Elon Musk's drive so bad wants to, you know, get immigrant to Mars because he already know it's going to happen.
So what I mean is that redundancy of the supply chain is going to be inevitable.
For example, I used to go some factories in one country which have lower tariff or freer trade policies so that we can produce air to supply for the rest of the world.
Now that thing is gone.
And also the cost, a low cost and efficiency for the global license supply chain is gone as well, because everywhere you have to pay very high tariff.
You're going to rebuild your own supply chain locally and you have to hire new human resources to get them trained and also, you know, everything like the legal registration and everything you need to refit in.
So, what means high risk and high cost was going to combine in the next 3 or 5 years.
So, we are looking at a trade disaster to come at us in the next 3 or 5 years.
Ina, going back to you, we know some companies, either Chinese company or multinational ones, They have shifted or relocated parts of their production capacities to other Asian nations in order to circumvent the existing US tariffs on China But now we are talking about a situation where, for example, like Professor Chu mentioned earlier, say Vietnam and Cambodia They are respectively faced with 46 % and a 49 % Tariffs imposed by Trump So, what do you make of the additional uncertainties that Trump's latest tariffs are creating for those companies?
Okay, you have to understand a little bit about Donald Trump.
He can't carry any of this thing through.
I agree with my colleague about all the numbers and things like that, but this isn't going to last five years.
This is not forever.
This is the actions of one man who believes that he can frighten people into coming to washington and begging him did you know it do something for them any of you think that there are a number of countries that did all we're not going to post over talent terrors with a court try to work it out with donald trump but that worked very well or uh...
that justin uh... in canada so i i don't think it's going to quickly anybody week despite donald trump is just the pilot on forget ticket panic uh...
yet he's imposed thirty two percent i want to gesture that they're sitting there wondering what the heck happened to their great ally and everything like this was supporting them and telling they should spend 10 % of their GDP on that defense so just keep in mind this is a bluff Donald Trump is just seeing what he can get out of it he loves to shock people and then see if there's some movement and then try to make a quick deal he doesn't have any sense of the long term nature of this.
This is the simplistic formula that they took, which is, what is the deficit, what is our deficit with you?
Okay, we find that happen, then we're going to charge you.
It's just it's something that a you know, an 11 or 12 year old would come up with.
He's being supported by Robert Lighthizer, who is the brainchild behind it.
I suppose to be an intelligent fellow, but I can't understand how any of this works.
And in terms of Chinese companies, they have to understand that making quick moves right now is not the thing to do.
They just have to wait and watch. At most, Donald Trump has two years, if he continues on this basis, the amount of inflation as I was trying to go to earlier is going to be so sharp and so severe the American public will turn on him, and the interim elections will be very very bad for him.
Professor Chui, we understand China's responses to the previous rounds of Trump tariffs that he has announced since he took office for the second term has been seen as mostly moderate.
For example, they included 10 % or 15 % retaliatory duties on certain kinds of American energy or agricultural products or an American chicken, et cetera.
Now, with regard to the current situation, what cards do you think China or the Chinese government is holding in terms of responding to the latest round of U .S. tariffs?
Well, currently I think China and U .S. trade religion are quite different from what was 10 years ago.
10 years ago, I think China is still the largest trading partner with the United States and vice versa, but I think ever since the last administration of Trump, last presidency, I think China is starting to shifting their way towards the global south nations.
For example, right now our largest trade corner is ASEAN nations and also other global south nations.
For example, ASEAN nations have more than 600 million of population, Latin America also have another 600 million of population.
So they combined together is basically what the effective market that America can provide.
And together, if we counted in West to Europe and Eastern and Mid to Europe, and you know, this grand European you know, region actually will provide another around, you know, 100 million in population of the customers that's already formed a very, very large market already and letting alone we're also have India, South Asian region, and also besides the south county and sub -county, and also we have the very large territory of the commerce, it's called Africa.
So I think right now the whole thing has been changed.
Number one, we're not that afraid of the so -called decoupling with American trade, and also secondly I think right now China has also been more important on the value chain.
So we're not like the only beneficiary from this value chain, but also we are one of the provider on this value chain as well.
For example, right now in high -end mechanics, in very high -end raw materials like the rare earths or so on, and also in some parts of the semiconductors in the smartphone and the digital devices, and also your green energy devices, EV.
And I think if America want to develop that kind of industry, if they want still to seize the commanding high in the future technology, they will have to work with China.
So this is a new deal.
This is a new trend.
This not going to be the true, I should say not going to be the true, like 10 years ago.
So 10 years ago, probably American would say, OK, we dominate the demanding high on all the high technology.
So if China want to catch up, they have to follow suit with America.
They have to stay in line.
But right now, a different story.
Well, America, if they want to be the number one in EV technology, they have to cooperate with China.
For example, Tesla, one of the largest sponsor for Trump, his largest factory and most efficient factory, is in Shanghai.
This is something we can start with and also talk about, you know, a civilian aviation industry and aerospace industry.
while largest producer slash largest user customers is in China.
I think we have more than ever, all the kinds of the confidence to say right now, it's more like a cooperation relations, rather than like before, we have to follow the leading force in the global market.
So I think this is just one thing, and also letting alone that Belt and Road Initiative, and also the Shanghai Expo, these symbolic event, actually are bringing in more of the products from the outside, where into the Chinese market.
For example, right now we're being importing more of the high -end agriculture products from America or from the grand American market.
We can charge tariffs on that, for example, like soybeans, for example, like potums, and etc. I think that's going to bleed out one of the most important voters, like the southern voters, for Trump, for good.
And we don't need to rely on soybean from America that much because right now we have Ukraine market, we have Brazil market, we have African market to offset this balance.
So I think we have more of the options than 10 years ago, and also America, well if they want to destroy the whole thing, they probably would should gear up even better.
OK, so, Ayana if we take a look at China's official statements, I mean those comments made by senior Chinese officials, for example, Chinese Premier Li Qian, as well as Chinese Government's actual policy directions, I believe one thing is quite clear, that China welcomes investors from all countries, including from America.
So, how do you think China can make sure that its responses, its retaliation in response to Donald Trump's tariffs, does not hurt the confidence of American businesses who wish to continue to do business, or even to expand their footprint here in the Chinese market?
Well, a lot of this will have to go to China's tariff responses.
We're in a trade war, so the question is what happens next.
China has, through this beginning period, not tried to escalate.
They have been trying to respond, to make sure that it's clear that they're determined they're not weak and they're not gonna fold into Donald Trump.
But there are other things that need to be factored into this.
Donald Trump has a two -part plan.
The first one is to increase tariffs, somehow get companies to build factories in the United States.
The second part is he wants to devalue the U .S. dollar.
I don't think it works if you, you know, U .S. is over 75 ,000 per person.
If you take off 30 percent, you're still way, way above almost every other nation except the very rich oil nation.
So it really isn't going to make a big difference.
But if he does that, he has two opposing forces.
is, driving up tariffs increases costs, drives up inflation.
You're taking money out of people's pocket and putting it in the government's pocket in essence.
When you devalue the U .S. dollar, that will drive inflation even further.
Now, let's just look at the basic things here.
The U .S. is doing this to itself.
China really doesn't have to respond very heavily.
Remember, it's the American consumer who's going to be punished by Trump's tariffs.
Categories such as food, energy, transportation, communication, medical care, these are all inter -dilastic issues.
I mean, you can't say, I'm going to forgive, I'm not going to give up on my medical care because I'm a little bit poor.
You might be wary about the bills that if you're an emergency you're going to go.
So these are areas where you're going to see high inflation, it's going to hit the consumers, and that's going to have a political effect, which is going to be felt relatively soon.
Within the next two to three months you're going to see very sharp inflation, and there's going to be a lot of pressure on Republicans to respond or face a real catastrophe in the midterm election.
Donald Trump's problem is he thinks he can do this all in a couple of years, or maybe He thinks one more term.
He's betting on things that just don't make a lot of sense, and I'm afraid that it's going to be over fairly soon, especially if the countries Mexico, Canada and the EU simply got together and said, look, we're going to coordinate our tariff responses to this, act in unison.
If China and ASEAN and these countries, look, we need to respond in unison.
I guarantee you within a week or two this would be over.
So in the meantime, we have also heard questions being raised.
Goes like, what does Beijing want from a US -China trade war or why is China not as worried about Trump's trade war as in the case of 2018?
I know, what is your thoughts on these questions?
Well, China doesn't want anything from a trade war it wants the trade war to stop.
It wants to uphold the international relations and laws, institutions.
One byproduct of this could be that the U .S. either voluntarily leaves the WTO or it could be voted out two -thirds say they want to meet and say we want to change the rules so that WTO can once again make function embodied and government the world except except for the u .s. because it doesn't want to be part of that and then a PE u .s. objected three -quarters of the vote of the world would just have to vote to in essence kick the u .s. out if that happens you could have a situation where the u .s. is isolated so now this has nothing to do with China China is not It is reacting to very, very strange
behavior by somebody who doesn't seem to understand economics.
So, at this point, China is going to sit back, hopefully coordinate with other nations, but look for an opportunity to reestablish, if not an international order through the WTO, through regional entities like BRICS, Belt and Road Initiative, these things, so that the rest of the world can keep trading even if a Donald Trump decides he wants to take his ball and go home.
So Professor Chih -Chiang, do you think there is still room at this point for Washington and Beijing to come to the negotiation table and resolve their trade conflicts through dialogue or consultation?
Yes. I do think so, because we got our shores back in in DC, they've been telling us this is actually being, this whole resolution for the tariff actually has been made within a very small circle, Lutnik, and also the basement and also the courier, and some other staff within the small group.
They made a whole situation, they made all this decision.
So actually, the whole decision making process is very simple.
So they just look at the numbers to see, okay, who has trade surplus against America?
And then they decided from the largest fish to start with to put some sanctioned tariff on them, and that's it.
So this number actually not rocket science.
So, for example, like 54 % of the tariff on China this time is based on some very careful calculation on our current trade situation?
No. Or like, you know, 49 % on Indonesia is based on some calculation?
No, it's not, just based on a hunch or some rough calculation, and that's it.
This is, I surely know about this process.
So the reason why they're doing that in a very rough way is that they want you to feel this tariff, not to actually, you know, calculate and, you know, try to, you know, very carefully to deal with this tariff.
They want you to feel it.
Feel all about it, feel scared about it.
And then you probably would fly to Washington to talk to Trump and his administration.
And then that's his original purpose.
And that's the reason why he purposefully left a seven -day window for everybody to go there to have a talk with him.
And what I know is that if you, within one week, go to Washington, sit down with them, and decided you would like to launch a process with the American and irrelevant authorities, and then you can get another bigger window, you know, say, well, this is my guess, like one month or half a month so you can nail down all the details.
So, yes, to answer your question in a simpler way.
Trump has already been set all these windows to welcome you to Washington, to talk to him, to bargain a better deal for them and also to calm you down.
There is a possibility, but whether you can, you know, score some better condition for your own country or not, then.
That's something we don't know about.
Hmm, I take your point.
Arguably, dialogue represents the best way out for trade conflict between any other two economies.
In the case of China and the United States, that's for sure as well.
I guess on the part of China, the message has been clear that China is willing to talk.
The uncertainty in my view is probably lying with the Donald Trump administration, nation which somehow has an unpredictable nature.
But I guess the most important thing to keep in mind is that today's China is really highly capable of confidence coping with many external shocks.
But thank you very much for joining us today Professor Chu Chiang joining us from Minzu University of China and Ina Tengen senior fellow with Taihe Institute.
You are listening to The World Today, I'm Dinghe in Beijing, we'll be back after a short break.
You are back with World today, I am Dingheng in Beijing.
Israel has announced a major expansion of the country's military operations in Gaza.
The Israeli Defense Ministry says that the operation will involve seizing large areas of lands that will be incorporated into the country's security zones, as well as a large -scale evacuation of Gaza's population from combat zones.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Wednesday vowed to increase pressure on the Strip until all hostages held over there are released.
Israel resumed its offensive against Gaza about half a month ago, shattering a two -month -old ceasefire with Hamas.
Joining us now on the line is Dr Wang Jing, Middle East expert and associate professor with Northwest University, in Xi 'an, China.
Thank you very much for joining us, Professor.
According to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, the Israeli side is now looking to divide together strip and increasing the pressure step by step.
quote -unquote. So do you think such a tactic or such a strategy is going to work in terms of pressuring the Hamas to release more hostages?
I think it's just a kind of measure that has already been taken by Israel given its very particular strategy consideration because from Israeli perspective that the ceasefire process has already lasted long enough and without a very, very satisfied, satisfied ending.
And also from the perspective of Israel, that the ceasefire should not be lasted, given that Israel perceived that the Hamas is still resisting any concessions, particularly over the issues of releasing hostages.
So that is why from Israeli perspective, okay, on the one hand, that Hamas is now growing its military capabilities, and is still trying to delay and resisting the concessions, and on the other hand, the pressure at home, particularly from the right wing and ultra -right wing political camps, actually encouraging Israeli the government and the leadership to take much harsher measures against the targets inside the Gadda Strip.
So that is why I think Netanyahu made the very latest decision to try to launch, for example, military strikes against the targets in the Gadda Strip with the connections of Hamas, and also on the other hand, might not go back to the negotiation table.
So that is why I think it's just a very decision that they made by Israel based upon this particular consideration over what is happening and what's kind of the relation that should be constructed between Israel and the Hamas in the future.
Hmm, so how would you look at this idea regarding incorporating more lands from Gaza into Israel's security zone?
Do you think such a zone will really bring Israel more security?
I don't think it's actually, will bring Israel more, uh, much more safe because actually, it is something that will provoke, uh, much more anger, provoke much more dissatisfaction in the among the civilians in the Gaza Strip.
And also, it will hurt the, the damage, the trust between Israelis and the Palestinians, and, uh, will, of course, destruct a very, very important foundation, political foundation for future peace possibilities between Israel and Hamas and other Palestinian factions.
So that is why I think it will hurt everybody.
Maybe from Israel's short -term perspective, they believe, okay, if they take much harsher manner, it would lead to the Israelis' much more positive strategic environment and also it will lead to much more maybe room for Israel to, for example, to find the hostage is taken by Hamas and try to, for example, to squeeze the rooms and squeeze the possible activities of Hamas members in the Gaza Strip.
So maybe from Israelis, I mean, short term perspective that it will benefit Israel's own security, but I mean, from the longer term, it will for sure bring Israel into the more dangerous scenario.
So, frankly speaking, Dr. Wanjing, do you think things or everything is now going back to what they were before the two -month -old ceasefire?
And do you think an expansion of the military campaign on the Israeli parts over there in the Gaza Strip will backfire internally in Israel?
I think we are actually looking, we are witnessing, I don't think it's going back to the scenario.
I mean two months ago before the ceasefire was reached, but I think we're actually witnessing a more dangerous scenario because two months ago, yes, there were conflicts.
But actually there were still hopes that the conflict would end and the international and the regional states are trying to encourage both Israel and Hamas to go back to the negotiation table to end the conflict through dialogues.
But now the problem is that okay, the violences are now escalating and very little efforts have already been mobilized from international and regional countries.
And their attention has been diverted to other issues, important issues.
For example, the terrorist wars or trade wars launched by United States.
And then the peace mediation, the peace efforts are very, very fragile and Israel does cared about it.
So that's why I think we're actually witnessing the decline of hope of peace and also the decline of the possibilities of going back to peace.
So that is why the situation has become more and more dangerous, maybe that I think more people will die and particularly the civilians in the Gath Street and the very foundation of hope for peace and hope for mutual trust between the Israelis and the Palestinians would also be seriously damaged.
By the way, Dr. Wan, what do you make of the regional or external factors going on over there that have somehow prompted or even emboldened the Israeli side to resume its offensive in the Gatha Strip?
I think it's actually a very critical moment, because we know that Israel, as you mentioned, they also have some kind of a debate at home, because some may think, OK, they should not should continue our conflicts.
We should go back to the negotiation table and restart the negotiation process, and find the possibilities of restoring peace.
And also on the other hand, maybe some ultra right -wing and right -wing political figures and voices, social opinion voices, they believe that Israel should take much harsher activities towards Hamas members in the Gaza Strip as well as all the, we can not say all, but the most absolutely majority of the civilians in the Gaza Strip from perspective of some very alsho right -wing members that has a very close connections with Hamas and should be eliminated, so called eliminated.
So this is a very dangerous, I mean attitude, this is very dangerous voices.
And these voices, as we repeatedly stress, this will damage the trust from Israeli perspective to the Palestinians.
And also we'll of course in turn, turn the public opinions of Palestinians attitudes towards Israel to the very direction of negative.
So that's why I think we need peace opportunities created and mediated by the international and regional countries.
And that is why we should not ignore what is happening there.
Hm, I guess countries like Qatar, Jordan and Egypt are still intensifying their diplomatic efforts, that's for sure.
But thank you very much for joining us.
Dr. Wang Jing, Associate Professor with Northwest University in Xi 'an, China.
Coming up, Boeing CEO admits to missteps on safety after being derailed by American senate.
You are listening to World Today.
We'll be back. Shanghai has made history, becoming the first Chinese city to ban smoking in outdoor public spaces.
Could this be the start of a nationwide shift?
China aims to cut adult smoking from 24 percent to 20 percent by 2030.
But, with cigarettes sales still climbing, is that goal realistic?
Can this policy genuinely make an impact, or will deep -rooted smoking culture stand in the way?
You're back with World Today I am Dinghen in Beijing.
In the United States, Boeing CEO Kelly Alteberg has acknowledged that a lax safety culture existed within the plane manufacturer, but he is insisting that the company has made sweeping changes to its people, processes, and overall structure to improve safety.
The Boeing CEO on Wednesday appeared before the Senate Commerce Committee for a hearing that focused on how the company is addressing the safety issues behind a door plug blowout incident in January last year.
The committee said the incident produced fresh doubt regarding Boeing's ability to safely build planes.
Investigators have found that 4 critical bolts were not restored at a Boeing factory to secure the dual plug, thereby leading the plug to blow out of the fuselage of a 737 MAX 9 plane in midair.
So joining us now on the line is Dr. Zhang Fan, from Beijing Normal University.
Thank you very much for joining us.
Hello. So, first of all Dr. Zhang, what do you make of the significance of Boeing CEO openly admitting that mistakes were made regarding the safety issues?
I wouldn't read too much into it, I wouldn't read it as a change of heart or becoming more honest. The fact is, this CEO is a new CEO. He got into this job in August last year, which means it's in his own best interest to expose all the problems and basically blame it on the predecessor.
If something is hidden under the rug and got discovered two years later then it becomes his problem.
So it's only natural, you know, there's something to be expected that he comes out with all the problems. And the fact that you know it comes out also shows the the problems become so well documented they we really can't hide it anymore.
By the way, do you believe that Safety can really improved by making or by attempting to make sweeping changes to Boeing's people processes and as well as the overall structure of the company?
Maybe. The those people, the new CEO I just mentioned, he's often engineering background, is not one of the business people, which is kind of important because in the past one of the Boeing's problem is the business people, they like to fight the unions, show their mettle to show their skills, but union labor costs isn't really, I don't think it's the major overhead for Boeing, but they had to, they built new factories with non -unionized workers, new workers, new hires, not properly trained and rushing them onto the at the production line to churn out clients as quickly as possible.
And that was one of the biggest problems. So maybe the new CEO can change that culture.
And also in terms of processes, apparently Boeing had a problem with middle layer management people who works on getting the manufacturing processes smooth.
They had really just the product engineers talking directly to business people who doesn't understand what they're talking about.
And lastly, in terms of the overall structure of the company, I think they will continue to see problems unless they really split the civil and military sides.
You know, Boeing is formed from the old Boeing and McDonnell Douglas.
The McDonnell Douglas really had a problem with the civilian safety with their MD -10 aircraft and the bust. And this looks eerily similar.
And they are now the military side of the company, and they're dominating.
And if the split doesn't happen, then maybe it just looks too similar.
I take your point. Now, since the dual -block blowout incident in January last year, we understand the U .S. Federal Aviation Administration has actually capped Boeing's 737 Max Model at 38 aircrafts per month.
According to Boeing CEO, the company is not even producing planes at that rate yet and the company is about 2 years behind in terms of delivering the ordered planes to its customers.
As we understand, 737 MAX represents the best selling plane in this company's history.
So with that in mind, how would you evaluate the potential losses that the current situation is going to inflict towards Boeing?
Building aircraft is a capital intensive process.
So if you have cash flow mismatches, that can be problematic, and if you don't deliver, if your customer isn't taking your aircraft, even if you put in steep discounts, which appears to be the case, if you look at their financial reports, then you don't have the income cashflow, but you also, you still have a whole lot of outgoing cashflows with, you know, paying compensation to customer for delivery delays.
You have to keep suppliers alive, you know, build up your inventory and all sorts of things that drains money.
If there is a gap in your funding, then that becomes more and more of a problem as that servicing cost is also going up.
Now, some people are even calling for Boeing and as well as some of the company's top executives, especially those who were involved in the design and the certification processes of the 737 MAX.
to be held accountable criminally for the design problem, for the production problem and for attempting to deceive the safety regulators in the United States.
In your observation, do you think that is likely to happen sometime in the future?
No, I don't think it's going to happen.
Boeing is really good at lobbying, which means the government is basically doing all they can to protect it.
with sort of superficial fines.
For example in 2021, there was a settlement deal.
So Boeing pays a fine, but it avoids any criminal charges so nobody goes to jail.
That held until the door blowout issue which causes public outrage to flare up and the department of justice have to sort of claim that Boeing violated the agreements.
So they are open to lawsuit again.
But then there's another plea deal that happened.
So Boeing paid a little bit more fine, and once again, they looked to avoid going to court.
Although that plea deal has been thrown out by a judge, but a new one is currently under work.
So eventually I think it will be just like a bunch of fines and nobody actually goes to jail.
So in other words, based on what you have elaborated, there comes to a fundamental question or an ultimate question over the long term.
Do you think Boeing will revive or revitalize its reputation regarding safety, as if nothing had happened?
I'm not too optimistic although they're obviously working on it, but I don't think the incentive it's strong enough for them to suffer the pains that come through, like major restructuring.
Because, if you look at Boeing's deals, they're really strong at lobby and they just want the new military contract for the sixth generation fighter, despite all the safety problems, including the military side.
And the military side, the safety in a way doesn't matter as much because you can hide things and hide between secrecy.
And the civilian side, you know, they face real customers.
So they have to fight but the trade war may present headwinds for them anyways.
So I think gradually the military side will win over and it becomes more like lucky marking, number two.
And then the civilian side, it would just be like a US car manufacturer.
It's not the best in safety.
They try to avoid the major blowups and they just keep going slow, slow decline, I think quickly.
Okay, thank you very much for joining us and for your analysis.
Dr. Zhang Fan joining us from Beijing Normal University.
Coming up, an American influencer's China visit is challenging misperceptions about this country.
You are listening to World Today, stay tuned!
Hello, my name is Alessandro Colombiev Sescheira.
I'm a professor of public policy and management at Tsinghua University in Beijing.
I am a great listener of The Wall today.
In my opinion, The Wall today is one of the best China radio programs. In The Wall today, we can get the best news and analysis in what is happening now in the world.
So please come to join us.
You are listening to World Today, I'm Dinghe in Beijing.
An American YouTube sensation Darren I Show Speed is making waves with a recent trip to China.
The 20 -year -old streamer arrived in China last week and has been immersing himself in local cultures during millions of viewers along the way.
His live stream conducted in Shanghai alone, attracted 5 .6 million viewers in only six hours.
And during his first ever visit China, iShowSpeed actually fully embrace this particular experience including sporting a traditional flowery jacket, watching lion dances, sampling hotspots, etc. and even test driving Xiaomi's electric vehicles.
His enthusiasm has resonated with audiences worldwide, leaving many international viewers astonished by the vibrancy of modern China.
So with that in mind, is this pointing to a growing trend regarding say digital influencers moving to bridge cultural gaps and offering alternative narratives about China?
Joining us now in the studio for a discussion is my colleague Ge Anna.
Thank you very much for joining us.
Thanks for having me.
So first of all, I guess you need to As you said, I share SPEED is a YouTube sensation or a top -tier Internet influencer from United States, who has worldwide followers of 100 million across various platforms. The real name of the 20 -year -old influencer is Darren Wacking Jr. He has built his massive global fanbase with his content revolving around gaming, music and real -life experiences.
Speed first gained traction through his NBA and FIFA gaming streams, but he truly exploded in popularity with his over -the -top reactions, comedic antics and unfiltered interactions with fans.
In China, his followers call him jia kang gu literally meaning hyperthyroid bro, you know, due to his exaggerated facial expressions and explosive energy.
and his signature -like high -intensity reactions have made this nickname both fitting and widely recognized in China and recently his travel around the world including his widely followed trip to China have further expanded his influence So how is his live streaming really challenging the sort of Western stereotype about China and how do you think those, because he belongs to the grassroots level of interaction between America and China, so how do you think grassroots activities like that are reshaping Western perceptions of the Chinese society, for example?
Right. His recent expedition through Beijing, Shanghai and other Chinese cities has transformed into something far more significant than just another creator trip, he has become a cultural ambassador challenging western perceptions of China as closed and underdeveloped because his life dream provided an immersive six hour unfiltered experience showcasing the for example the cyberpunk narrative Shanghai's Band, the historical grandeur of Beijing's Forbidden City and the martial arts heritage of Hunan's Shaolin tempo all in real time.
His Shanghai stream alone, as you said, attracted 5 .6 million views while his Beijing and Hunan session reached about 5 .3 million and 7 .3 million views respectively with over there are a hundred thousand comments.
For example, the technical quality of the live stream was also eye -opening for many Western viewers when Speed took a high speed train through Eternal, the 2K quality stream remained uninterrupted, many overseas viewers were stunned, commenting that China's internet is faster than loading text message in the New York City subway.
This technological reality directly contradicts the long -standing western media narrative that portraits China as having strict internet censorship and outdated technology, and beyond the visuals spontaneous a street level interactions also brought an emotional connection in Beijing strangers invited him to join a basketball game and in chen du he interacted with sutran opera face changing performers this inscribed moments of a daily life left a Western audiences surprised a saying that they had no idea Chinese people were this fun and welcoming others say seen elderly, you know, elderly dancers
who pulled speed into their routine made them realize China's social energies are far beyond what Western media portrays Even the Chinese Embassy in the Chinese...in the United States praised his live stream on X, claimed a new channel for foreign audiences to experience China's vibrancy This kind of dual endorsement from both grassroots and official sources really challenge the stereotype of China as a place of rigid control and underdeveloped in the western...
from the western mainstream media.
So here are we talking about unexpected moments in the live streaming activity becoming key in terms of breaking through the western biases?
And I guess on communication studies, there is an idea called uncontrolled reality, right?
How do you think uncontrolled reality is contrasting with those scripted narratives?
Let me give you some examples One of the most viral moments was Spi's reaction to douji, a really traditional Beijing fermented bean soup His exaggerated expressions, eyes wide open, treating and forcing a smile, become an instant meme on the Internet This clip alone garnered over 30 million views on international platforms Instead of reinforcing the Western trope of Chinese people eat weird food The genuine reaction showcased China's diverse food culture in a relatable way to the other audiences Another memorable moment was his visit to the Shaolin temple Initially, he accidentally entered a wrong martial
arts school waiting two hours before finally meeting the real Master Liang.
Western viewers likened his journey to a real -life Kung Fu movie, calling it a movie -like test of patience.
When Master Liang told him that friendship isn't about money, it's about the bond through Kung Fu as Speed wanted to donate some blast to the temple.
The livestream exploded with comments appreciating such philosophical depth of Chinese martial arts.
Another hit is the reaction of his security detail At the start of his trip, his bodyguard remained on high alert But after few days, he relaxed, even you know, filming scenic moments on his own phone This shift from tension to ease really sparked the discussion online because this subtle change shows how safe China really is completely opposite to what they've been told from Western media because this contrast with Western media coverage is striking, and Western allies often employ, you know, scripted storytelling about China, such as selectively filming poor rural areas, while ignoring modern
infrastructure, or, you know, manufacturing fake news about uncivilized Chinese tourists or Chinese citizens, or porting China as a civilian state while ignoring the mass civilian programs by the FBI. So, Speed's livestream really thrived on the inscribed reality.
These raw, inscribed moments directly counter the western media's polished, gender -driven narratives.
Thank you very much for joining us.
That was my colleague, Ge An -na.
Unfortunately, that's all the time for this edition of World Today.
I'm Dean Honey Bae Jin.
Thank you so much for listening, bye for now.
