So many of us follow the rules, build what appears to be a successful life and still something essential feels missing.
That feeling sends us on a chase for more meaning or purpose, impact and clarity.
But what if the way we seek them is kind of all wrong and actually makes us less happy, content and alive, not more?
We do the work, we make the difference, we build the life that's supposed to matter to us and to others.
We leave our quote dent in the universe, or at least the lives of the small handful of people that matter to us, and still our lives just feel thin.
And we want more meaning, we say, but the way that we're pursuing it may actually end in less.
Today's conversation is a gentle but powerful reframe of what we mean when we talk about meaning.
I'm sitting down with Dave Evans.
He's the co-author of Designing Your Life, the co-founder of Stanford's Life Design Lab and the author of the new book How to Live a Meaningful Life.
And Dave really challenges the idea that fulfillment and impact, which so many of us equate to meaning we've been taught that that those things are the finish line.
Instead, he invites us into something more human, a way of living that's rooted in aliveness, presence and becoming.
And we explore why meaning can turn into a treadmill how to move between getting things done and actually being here, and four surprisingly accessible sources of meaning that most of us overlook every single day.
This isn't about finding, your quote one true purpose, which tends to be, for so many people, a wild distraction at best and a big letdown at worst.
It's about learning how to feel more alive in the life that you're already living.
So excited to share this conversation with you.
I'm Jonathan Fields and this is Good Life Project.
You and I had a conversation a number of years back, immediately clicked.
And it's fun because we've sort of been pursuing really similar parallel questions, sometimes overlapping questions.
Meaning has been a central thing in my life for quite a long time, really kind of exploring it, uncovering what is it?
What does it mean?
How do we pursue it?
So the big question I think we'll start out with is what are we talking about when we're talking about meaning?
I think we're talking about aliveness.
Joseph Campbell, in his Power of Life PBS video series from years back, was being interviewed, you know, and at one point they're talking about meaning making, talking about Frankl, talking about Freud.
And he says, you know, I don't know.
I don't think it's really meaning that we're really after.
I think it's the rapture of being alive, the experience of the rapture of being alive, which I think is underneath that meaning question.
And so I think that might be the soul of it.
I feel like the deeper we get into life, the more we tend to center it in our own questioning.
And yet we really never deconstruct it.
Like, what does it mean?
And of course, there's the grand question that's offered in movies, like what is the meaning of life?
As if there's a universal thing for everybody.
But I really have increasingly just found that we can define that word however we want to define it, as long as it carries weight for us or lightness for us.
Yeah.
To your question of what is meaning.
Interestingly, you know, because we were in this conversation a long time with a lot of people
I mean, let's say thousands of people.
We hear two things over and over again.
I'm not fulfilled.
I thought it'd be fulfilled and not fulfilled.
So I got to come back to what you think that means.
And you know I'm not making the impact.
Or I need to make a difference, or I need to.
My life needs to matter.
I need to make the world a better place.
There was some, you know, production outcome.
I think impact is the best word.
So the two primary things people were looking for that they were getting not enough of existentially was impact and Okay.
Or fulfillment.
And we think both of those frankly, are dead ends, since we came up with some reframes and some new ideas.
So currently, I would say the zeitgeist of meaning I'm not sure it's the broadest definition it could be is it's all about impact and it's all about fulfillment.
So why do you think those are dead ends?
Okay, let's start with fulfillment. what does fulfillment mean to most people?
Well, we actually know, because who told us?
Abraham Maslow told us, that's what he told us.
You know, because the apex of the human experience, the top of that pyramid, is self-actualization.
According to the 1943 paper that he wrote that the NIH now still claims is one of the stickiest ideas in the social sciences of all time.
He defines literally this.
He says to attain self-actualization, one must become all that one can be.
And if you become all that one can be, then you will attain the experience of fulfillment.
So self-actualization is the goal.
Be all you can be is the way you get there.
And the prize is fulfillment.
Here's the only problem.
The Life Design Lab at Stanford for 20 years has been teaching.
We now are more convinced than ever.
All of us contain more aliveness than when lifetime permits you to live out.
Ie, there's more than one of you in there.
That's the good news.
So if in fact, that's true and we're absolutely convinced it's true, everybody's way bigger than one lifetime's worth of living and you've decided you have to manifest your entirety In this life in order to feel like you've got fulfillment.
You can't get there from here.
So the traditional definition of fulfillment, I became everything I can be, is unattainable.
That's the good news, actually.
But if you've decided you need that to feel okay about yourself, you just set a policy that you have to be in despair for the rest of your life.
Bad choice.
Bad choice.
So that's the fulfillment problem.
The impact problem is, impact is great.
Make the world a better place.
I mean, you're trying to make an impact.
I'm trying to make an impact.
But...
Impact is a thing and you're not a thing, you're a person.
And so after you, let's say you're lucky enough to do everything right and it even works out.
Most of the other 8 billion people stay on your script.
Even if you do it all right by the way, a bunch of people go off script and you do the right thing.
That doesn't work.
If you're lucky enough that something actually worked and actually left some kind of a positive result, that's great.
And then about 10 minutes go by and the world goes, so what have you done for us lately?
And impact is a moment in time.
I mean, we sold over a million bucks.
Well, okay, that's great.
But now what?
I mean, I've worked with the U.S.
Olympic Committee.
Nothing as exciting as ascending the Olympic platform or terrifying as coming back down the other side.
Now what?
So impact is fine, but it can't be the only thing.
So if you've got all your meaning eggs in your impact basket, you're in real trouble.
You'll never get there from here.
So we need to look at some other forms.
Which starts getting into our reference, our idea about understanding that we don't just live in one world, we live in two.
But I'll stop right there.
And there are definitely thorny issues there.
And when you lay it out that way, it's like okay.
So if we pursue meaning and we swap the words fulfillment and impact in for them, then effectively we're investing ourselves in pursuing something that we can never truly have.
Right.
Like the next minute, it's no longer there if that's the way that we define it.
So it's kind of like a life of perpetual frustration and futility to a certain extent.
And that is the sound of the voice we've been hearing is this deep frustration.
And when you get down, you know, between, you know, under 38, 35, it's despondency.
It's like, I'll never get there.
I mean, the game is rigged.
I can't have it.
That's a terrible place to be.
I mean also one of the things that occurs to me about the way that you're presenting it is there are things that rely on something outside of you to get the feeling that you want to get.
Say more.
Meaning that, you know, impact, right?
Right, yes.
Okay, so that exists outside of you.
You're making a difference in the world to someone else, to some other beings, to some environment, whatever it may be.
And sure you may have a certain amount of control over the circumstances, over the resources, over the agency, over the process, the path.
But you're never going to have full control.
And even if you do one moment, in the next thing, you're not going to.
And at some point, you're not going to actually be able to do the thing you want to do.
And if that is how we define meaning, how we get the feeling that we so desperately want to feel we're going to keep bumping up against these situations where we're actually not able to get it as much as we want to and as much as we pour our own energy into it and our resources.
There's always going to be an external part of it.
Yeah, that's out of your control.
One of our lines is, is meaning the new money?
Nah.
What do we mean by that?
Well, you know, the hedonic treadmill, that thing of which, how much do you need?
A little bit more.
It's the addiction cycle, right?
So in the workplace in particular.
Historically, the two classical engines of the hedonic treadmill the thing of which I need a little bit more but can never quite get are money and power.
How much money do I need?
A little bit more.
How much power do I need?
A little bit more.
Well, frankly, those, those two engines have driven capitalism pretty successfully.
I'm not sure of all good outcomes, but they worked really well.
And now what we're hearing is it's the same complaint, but it's around meaning.
How much meaning do I need?
A little bit more.
So people are stuck on this thing.
That's not, you can't get the, so we've got to reframe it.
So we say on fulfilled, you can't be fulfilled, but you can become fully alive.
Hmm.
And on the impact thing, impact is good.
But how about a couple of other forms?
We come up with four other forms of meaning making, which are wonder flow, coherence and formative community.
We might come back to that.
But, you know, let's get the four or five color crayon box, not the one color crayon box.
Yeah.
So if we take that word aliveness, then that is also thorny.
What do we mean by that?
Well, OK, so our definition.
So Bill and I, you know, we do human centered design.
Design thinking is the modern slang term to describe what's been around since 1963, begun at Stanford, now all over the world, called design thinking, which is human-centered design.
And human-centered design is human two ways.
It's how do humans collaborate and ideate?
So what's the design process that works for human beings?
And then how can you point that activity of designing cool things in ways that work for human beings?
So let's humanly make human usable stuff.
And then we added the idea we could even make ourselves, so we could apply design thinking to making our lives.
And so this aliveness question starts with, well, what does it mean to be human?
And our shortest definition of that as a human being is a becoming.
We are always growing.
We're always moving toward, you know, so if I'm a becoming, I'm never done.
And the aliveness that I'm looking for is the awareness of my experience of living into that becoming, both in the present moment and in the growth moment.
You You know change is inevitable.
Growth is optional.
So are you living into your becoming?
And if you really reconcile yourself to that, do what we call radical acceptance, you're never going to get done.
Now, suddenly, that's the good news.
So it's not FOMO, the fear of missing out.
It's the joy of missing out.
There's always something new coming.
Hmm.
I mean it's interesting to me also.
I look at that a little bit of a Buddhist lens which invites you perpetually to keep coming back to the present moment, not live in the past, not live in the future.
And because in the present moment, which is truly the only moment that we can really experience fully, that is where aliveness comes from.
That is where you are your most human self.
And yet – you know, all of us aspire and you know the social science research shows that we are in fact, you know quote, happiest when we are aspiring towards something meaningful to us um, or towards something when we're in and that could be our own personal growth.
That could be checking some boxes somehow matters.
But um, It was funny because a lot of us think we'll finally hit that point in life where we kick back.
We don't have to work so hard to change or to grow or to get.
And that turns out that we're generally least happy if and when we hit that moment.
But the notion of...
I used to use this phrase, grateful yearning, to try and embody this notion that we can strive, in fact, for growth to become, to ever, always become and, at the same time, honor and appreciate and be grateful for the moment that we're in.
They're not two things in opposition, but I think sometimes we think they are.
The term I use that you call grateful yearning, I characterize as befriending your longing.
So, okay, you sit there and you watch this amazing sunset.
Like, oh, God, that was so great.
And then ask anybody who's just seen an amazing sunset.
Right as it finishes, what do they think?
I want more.
That experience awakens the longing for more.
Even that wasn't good enough.
No, no, no, no, no.
The reframe is it's not that it's not good enough.
It's that it was wonderful.
And you intrinsically, as a becomeer, as an entity whose longing leans toward those ultimates and always will.
That ooh, I'd like some more.
Of that just means oh, I'm still alive and I'm coming back tomorrow.
Yeah.
So back to this thing about the present moment.
In fact, Bill and I actually chatted back and forth with each other for two years about whether or not do we deserve to write this book.
Because if you take these 200 pages, you distill it all the way down to a post-it note.
It's about the present moment.
It's all about the present moment.
We're kind of going, everybody already knows that.
Ram Dass, you know, the Buddha, Jesus.
We're done here.
And then either we're bringing a new take on a deep wisdom that's helpful in the modern era, or we're wasting a bunch of paper.
And frankly, it's pretty good stuff, but it really is about the present moment.
But the modern world.
We spend 9997 of our time in the achieving brain, which Bill and I describe as.
And where does that brain take you?
It takes you into what we call the transactional world.
The GSD, the get shit done world.
And we're there all the time.
And by the way, we know how to transactionalize anything.
I'll come back to that.
But meanwhile, in this experience of the present moment, where is that occurring?
That's occurring in what we call the flow world.
The flow world which is the present moment, coursing like an aquifer right underneath every experience.
You're in in the present moment, at all times, ready to be tapped into if you have but the willingness to turn your awareness and your attention to it, even briefly.
So we've got these two worlds and all we're really doing in this book is inviting people to come back over and spend a little more time in the flow world, where you can experience wonder, flow itself, coherency and a deep experience of community we call formative community.
And if you add those four things to impact in your meaning-making diet, you're going to get a lot more calories.
And we'll be right back after a word from our sponsors.
Let's talk about those two worlds a little bit more because it's really interesting to me.
So the transactional world and the flow world.
Yep.
What's driving each?
The truth is there's one world.
There's one quantum reality.
It's way over our pay grade to receive it.
So what's going on in those two worlds actually is what form of consciousness, what form of mindset do you have access to at that time?
Okay.
So what's really going on there is it's all happening all the time.
It's just that we're not attentive to it.
So a real simple example, I'm sitting in a staff meeting.
The staff meeting is going by.
We're talking about the budget again, whether or not we're going to get this new project.
You know.
And there's eight of us in the room and the boss is running the meeting as badly as she usually does.
And it takes about 45% of my brain to be attentive to that.
And I can either...
Just be entirely in that interaction, which is, again, all living in the past.
How did it go?
Living in the future.
What are we going to do next?
It's never in the present.
And I can just be thinking about dinner.
I can be thinking about the next thing.
I can be thinking about my counterargument.
So I'm staying in that place the whole time.
Or while I'm doing that, I can actually look out the window and notice that the color of the trees in the parking lot is changing.
And then I can kind of go, oh, gee, I wonder how that happens, which is a transactional question.
Or I can go, oh, that's lovely.
And I can participate in it.
So when I'm in the transactional world, I'm an agent of change, right?
I'm an actor.
When I'm in the flow world, I'm a participant.
When I'm in the transactional world, I'm pushing.
And when I'm in the flow world, I'm receiving.
And what we're encouraging people to learn how to do is to learn how to switch back and forth quickly.
In fact, eventually this is really a second half of life thing.
Learn how to be in two places at the same time.
And that's what pops into my head.
The question for me is aren't we really in both worlds all the time?
But the one that we experience is the one that we're attending to.
Exactly.
Exactly.
And part of the thing that we're trying to say is frankly, that all that stuff like the mindfulness movement and these nice guys like Jonathan Fields, you know, who are telling us all this stuff, that's great.
But too many people are hearing that first of all like even hitting the experience of being in flow, which takes me high.
As you know, psychology about like flow is so elusive.
I have to be in this incredibly special state that it's all too.
I need to go learn how to meditate for 40 years, and then maybe I can get my mindfulness act together.
We've made this thing too hard.
Yeah.
Thich Nhat Hanh said, if enlightenment isn't available now, it's not available at all.
Can we start accessing this stuff a little more simply with really simplified design tools?
Like wonder, the experience of wonder, and we say mystery plus curiosity equals wonder.
And the experience of wonder or awe is fundamentally a live-making human-enabling, generative experience.
So let's get as much wonder as you can, a bunch of meaning.
The experience of wonder is a meaning-making experience.
How do you do that?
Well, we get a little trick called put on your wonder glasses.
How to look around the room with your normal glasses.
How to look around the room with your transactional glasses.
Then take another pass and look around the room with your wonder glasses and teach yourself how to see what's actually in front of you all the time.
So you're exactly right.
Both these worlds are available all the time.
All we're trying to do is give people tools and reframes that free them up to access this broader world much more easily.
Hmm.
And we do need to get stuff done.
There's a bunch of work we've got to get done.
But let's be fully human, alive people along the way.
Let's learn how to savor and enjoy on the trip.
One of the things we're helping people watch out for is what we call the practice to production trap.
So, you know, if you want to get good at these things, they become practices.
So mindset and practices are really what this book is about.
The exercises in this book are practices.
You just keep doing them because it's how you live.
And the problem is, in this world, we can transactionalize anything.
Like, hey, I really killed it in my 20-minute sit this morning.
I think that was like a nine.
Yeah, yeah.
So I'm scoring.
I'm just thinking about the stars I've accumulated on my meditation app right now.
Exactly.
Don't break the streak no matter what you do.
Because my meditation practice.
The goal of that, of course, is to get enough centeredness to get me through the business day.
So I'm going to tank up over here in this meditative moment.
And then I'm going to go back to the real world, the transactional world, and take a little of my meditative juice with me.
And it'll get me across the finish line.
And if I'm good, I could get it down to 15 minutes.
If I can get a day's worth of centeredness out of 15 minutes, I'm killing it, man.
I'm killing it.
You just made everything a performance.
As opposed to.
Can you simply enter into the present moment and be an alive person there, experiencing the wonderfulness of actually being a participant in this thing called reality?
It sounds like also one of the underlying assumptions here is that meaning or aliveness use the word you want to use.
We tend to say this comes from the big things, the big moments, the big awakenings.
And it sounds like what you're positing also is like, well, yes, and.
It can happen.
But it can also be like the little thing that you notice on the side of your eye, the feel of somebody's hand in yours for two seconds when you're just giving a kiss in the morning.
It can be like the tiniest little passing things.
Yeah, it really is.
I mean, the big things are big.
Don't get me wrong.
But the little things are important.
And let us not relegate them to the cliche of, well, you know, smell the flowers along the way.
Right.
The problem with sniff the flowers along the way is like okay, the real world, we're going to go get the new book out.
We're going to go start the company.
But along the way, you need a little break.
You want to go sniff a flower.
That's fine.
And then come back and join us.
Get out of the pits and get back on the track and do the real thing.
So we've ended up with a belief system where the transactions define the real world.
Which is absolutely crazy.
It's a real part of the world.
But those little moments aren't just a quick side trip and then back to it.
Those little moments are it.
Right.
They are it.
This is where the last big reframe, we have three reframes.
One is impact, one is fulfillment, fully love, not fulfillment.
And the last one is the scandal of particularity.
Mm-hmm.
The scandal of particularity is actually a theological idea and now become philosophical, which is, as it turns out, any and all ultimates truth beauty justice, compassion you name it are never experienced.
We will never attain them.
They're all aspirational.
All you ever experience, as it turns out, is a small partial reflection of it that has a temporary instantiation and then is gone.
So it's never enough.
But that's the fundamental nature of reality.
Like you know I think you know right through about two-thirds of the way through the conversation I think Jonathan and I actually understood each other.
Because when he went like, hmm, I went like, yeah.
And at that moment, we both knew we were saying the same thing without having to say it.
The whole conversation was good, but that one spot, that one spot, oh, God, he really got it.
He really got it.
And what was that?
That's unity.
That's a little reflection of unity.
Now, the scandal of particularity is like, really?
That's the way the world is set up?
We'll never get the real thing?
No, no, no, that is the real thing.
So you reframe it, and then you move to celebrating the particularity, which occurs in moments.
So the fundamental task of the meaning designer is moment-making, right?
And what you do is you'll let them be what they can be.
So that little two seconds hand in hand, when you're not just touching, you're actually connecting.
You deeply celebrate that moment.
You savor it later because it reminds you that that profound truth of we are a union is true.
Because it was there for a minute.
It was there for a couple of seconds.
It's a big choice to decide after those two seconds, like, ooh, it's over already.
I want more.
Or, oh, that was fabulous.
That's a critical choice.
Right.
Or like, oh, this is a signal that is leading to something even better.
Yeah.
You know, which often we just take it as.
It's like okay, so this was like a check along the way to like the real thing which is coming next.
How does this square in your mind with you know, I think so many of us were acquainted with Viktor Frankl's ideas around the sources of meaning which fundamentally, he distills down to work, love and courage and suffering.
Yes.
When asked, what does it take to have a meaningful life?
Freud, lieben und arbeiten, love and work.
Right.
Right.
So relationships and achievement.
Then Frankl ups it to one more thing, so it's love, achievement, and suffering.
Suffering, well, which he learned in the concentration camps.
And his point there was that if the only agency left to you by virtue of your oppression is your decision for how to respond to your situation, which is all that was left to a concentration camp prisoner, all they had was how to react.
If you do that nobly, that alone is sufficient to be a person-making experience, hence suffering.
Let's bounce up to Seligman.
You know, the founder of positive psychology and happiness isn't good enough.
So okay, it's got to be flourishing, and what supports flourishing?
Five things, the PERMA model.
There are five elements to the flourishing life P-E-R-M-A positive experience, E.
Engagement, R.
Relationships, M.
Meaning-making, A achievement.
Okay, so Seligman's got a pretty long list.
Like, okay, I want to be happy.
That's positive.
I want to be engaged in the world.
I want to do stuff.
But when I'm really doing stuff deeply, that's called flow.
I want to be in relationships, love.
It's all about love.
Bob Waldinger and all the people in the Harvard Adult Study will tell you what's the number one thing.
It's all about love, dude.
And meaning making, this is coherency and living in concert with your values.
I'm actually a meaningful person because I'm living out what I really believe.
And then achievement, I'm getting stuff done.
So that's the whole portfolio, according to other scientists.
And what we're saying is entirely complementary to that.
All we're really saying is, look, for God's sake, you know, get beyond that.
Just impact and achievement and allow these other things to start serving you, all of which are going to take you into the present moment.
So if you start becoming a good moment designer, which isn't just the hedonism of having a good time, because people will do.
Where's the aspiration?
Where's the purposefulness?
Where's the serving of their mankind stuff?
Well, we trust people.
And so when we say, of the three wonder, flow and coherency, coherency is where who I am, what I believe and what I'm doing are in alignment.
When you experience that, your life is more meaningful.
And we trust the overwhelming majority of people we talk to.
Their fundamental values.
What they care about are really noble, and they have the other people in the world involved in them.
So if I just say, look, the coherent life is the way to go, it's going to take care of itself.
People are going to start moving down the path purposefully if they actually are living out their values in a conscious way.
You know I've met in 20 years of teaching college.
I met exactly one young man who walks up to me and says look, can I take the class?
I go, well, sure, anybody can take the class.
He goes, no, no, you don't understand.
I figured out it's all bullshit.
I'm a nihilist.
It's just about the money.
I'm here to make as much money as I possibly can, have as good time as I can, and then I'm out of here.
I don't give a shit.
Are you clear?
I kind of go, yeah, well, we're clear.
He says, so am I allowed to take the class?
I said, well, sure.
Any worldview is allowed to take the class.
I might encourage you to be a little open-minded that there might be more to life than that.
But, you know, at the end of the quarter, I said, how's it going?
He goes, well, I'm asking some questions now.
I go, good.
But so I, you know, 20 years later, I got one nihilist.
Right, right, right.
I got exactly one nihilist you know and I'm in a couple of, you know, struggling determinists and this kind of stuff.
But most people are trying to leave the campground better than they found it.
So if they just lean into that, you don't have to find your purpose, but you can live purposefully all the way down that road of becoming.
Yeah, and that's a big distinction.
I think also this notion of purposefully versus your capital, B capital, big purpose, which we get so tripped up with.
You keep referencing different I'm going to call them meaning engines and you explore four of them wonder flow, community and coherence.
Let's dip into each one of these a little bit.
We talked a little bit about wonder, but let's start there.
Curiosity and mystery.
Take me deeper into this.
Okay, so it comes out of the mindsets.
And so, you know, we have five mindsets in this book.
So the wonder piece you know, Dr Keltner.
Ed UC Berkeley wrote the book awe you know and he studied eight forms of how awe or wonder can be experienced in the world.
And that is a fundamentally, you know, human experience that transcends social, economics and culture and background and race and all that stuff.
And it's a fundamentally human experience of this experience of awe being in a world that's bigger than you are.
Which is what Maslow, by the way, finally figured out.
As you know, the top of Maslow's curve isn't self-actualization, it's self-transcendency.
In his 70s, just before he died, he'd long suspected he was wrong.
And he's right, he was wrong.
That being fully yourself, which is egotistical, isn't the end of the human experience.
Being beyond yourself, self-transcendency.
And if you achieve self-transcendency, what do you get?
You get meanings.
So when I get beyond myself, I recognize that I'm a part of something bigger, and that's meaningful.
So wonder, reminds me that the world is bigger than I am, and that's a very meaning-reinforcing experience.
So how do we experience more of it then?
Okay, so we have a simple exercise called put on your wonder glasses.
As designers, it's all about behavioral stuff that you can actually prototype and do.
If we can't give you a handle on doing it, then we're writing philosophy books, and that's not what we do.
We write design books.
So Wonder Glasses says you want to put on your Wonder Glasses.
What you do is you'll look at a scene.
In fact, the example in the book is me sitting in a chair in a room right across that wall, looking around my living room.
And it says you take one quick look around.
Just take a look.
What do you see?
Brrrr.
You know, you just get the little GoPro camera look.
And so what do you notice?
And the second pass is your transactional look like, OK, and what needs doing here?
Like, oh, yeah, we got to get the piano tuned.
I wonder if we're ever going to get that clock fixed.
And so you let your transactional brain do what it wants to do, which is come up with action items.
Whatever you see, because you start seeing what's wrong with things or what's right with things.
Oh, we should buy another one of those.
That's great.
And then your third pass is the wonder glass is like and what's in front of you that has a little mystery to it or begs a little more than meets the eye, the moreness than meets the eye.
And as I pass by, I'm looking at the chairs and the arms of the rocking chairs are scuffed.
And I'm like, oh, those are scuffed.
I wonder how that happened.
Oh, it's because hundreds of people have sat in that chair and many of them had really deep conversations.
I wonder how those souls are doing now.
I remember the wonder of being in the presence of people telling the truth about their lives.
So that wonder of, oh my God, there's literally a where spot there.
On a chair in front of me.
That's from souls being rubbed off on the lives of the people in this room.
So the initial act there, though, is also it's noticing.
It's noticing.
Right.
And I'm wondering if, I'm wondering if.
Yes.
So here's what happens to me when I sit for meditation.
I'll sit for 25 minutes.
The first 17 minutes of those are transactional.
Yep.
Yeah.
It's almost like I need to clear the transactional part out.
And then finally, just towards the end, my mind starts to do what, It starts to open up and it starts to just be.
And it feels like for most of us we probably live in such a transactional state that we kind of need to do that first scan to get the transactional sort of like checked off before we can allow our minds to just create the space in our minds to kind of just notice oh, and what else?
Uh-huh.
Yeah, because the resistance, you go, oh, I'm doing it again.
Now it's gotcha.
Yeah.
As opposed to there's a, there's a.
There's an old aphorism that says you cannot prevent the birds from flying over your head, but you need not let them make a nest in your hair.
So when a thought appears, you know, learn how to let it go by.
So it's not so much hacks, but there really are humanly designed strategies inside these simple exercises.
Give you another one.
It's called magic trees.
Which is how to identify a moment of wonder.
So, you know, you're looking at a tree.
Now, nine times out of ten, there's a little air moving around the tree.
Look at the tree, and it's like the tree's just sitting there.
And then you go, okay, so that's the first look.
And then now, look at it long enough to notice that the branches and the leaves are quivering.
And you look, and you look, and you go, oh my God, it is moving.
It's actually moving.
Now, what was static...
Now is moving.
And you kind of go like, ooh, this thing is actually really alive.
Then close your eyes for three seconds, open it again, and try to not see the moving tree.
You can't do it.
So suddenly you've transformed this tree by noticing it.
So these are tricks.
I mean, these are ways.
So I'm trying to take that 17 minutes and knock it down to one.
Yeah.
And the truth is they're all over the place.
Yeah.
And what's interesting to me also and I'm curious whether you agree with this is you know.
So I live in Boulder, Colorado.
I hike all the time.
And I often hike the same trails over and over and over and over and over.
And somebody once said to me, like, aren't you bored silly?
Like, why do you keep doing the same thing over and over and over?
I was like, it's never the same trail.
Yeah, it's the same trail on a map.
But every day that I'm out there, if I really allow myself to just be there and be present to it, it is never the same.
And it's really cool to see how it changes every day when you allow yourself to be present to that.
And it was such a foreign notion to the person I was talking to.
They're like, yeah, sure, whatever.
No, you have to keep doing different trails.
It's like, well, you can, and that's awesome, and I do.
And I also can get pretty much everything that I go hiking for doing the same trail over and over.
Well, because again, the question, aren't you bored?
What does that question give me a hint that's going on as the aspiration of the questioner?
Well, I need novelty.
Right.
If I recognize this thing, it'd be boring.
Like, you know, why the hell would I have sex with my wife this week?
We had sex last month.
I mean, it's, you know, been there, done that.
Right?
No, I'm doing it again, actually.
Dude, if you've decided novelty is the prerequisite to legitimacy, this is the X Games mentality.
You don't even feel alive until you're scared to death.
Okay, now you've really set your threshold at a ridiculously inhuman level.
So the whole possibility to like, oh, it's gorgeous, maybe even familiarly gorgeous.
Hmm.
And it still evokes the aliveness in you like, oh, wow.
I mean, sometimes I'll just sit there and stare at a tree in silhouette during sunset.
I'm a big fan of silhouette.
But I was asking my wife the other day, why do I like silhouette so much?
Why is a blacked out tree so pretty?
I have no idea.
But it is.
It just blows me away.
And I just sit there and I just longingly look at that thing.
And...
I enjoy the living day less out of the fact that I noticed that it is pretty, you know?
So if newness is the only thing you're allowed, which is what the social media based world will tell you, then you're you're in for some real trouble.
Yeah.
So agree with that.
And we'll be right back after a word from our sponsors.
Talk to me about coherence.
Coherence goes all the way back to our earliest work, the compass exercise.
In fact, the people who do research in meaning not the meaning of, but the meaning in life, you know, make it really clear that what we call connecting the dots, the three dots of who am I, what do I believe and what am I doing
And are those three things in alignment?
You can't align them until you articulate them.
So there's an exercise to write that stuff up, which isn't that hard.
And then, of course, some compromises involved because the real world is an imperfect place.
So now, if I know who I am roughly, what my current story is, I know what my key values are about life in general we call the life view and we know what my values are about the workplace and my engagement with the world we call the work view.
If I've got those three things in mind, written up, then I actually have the capacity to notice when I'm actually living with integrity or coherency, acting out kind of who it is that I am.
And so somebody says, well, how was your day, Dave?
It was good.
I got to talk to my friend Jonathan Field.
And Jonathan has been doing the Good Life Project for a long time.
We've been working on the life design thing for a long time.
So we are really aligned.
And it was completely consistent with what I care about and completely consistent with what I want to do to be in conversation with this guy.
I actually got to be completely coherent for an hour today.
I'm rocking it.
So we call this coherency sightings.
Catch yourself in the act of, oh, my God, for a couple of minutes today, it was actually working.
Not the outcome.
Production was done, but I'm participating in a value aligned way that reinforces.
You know what Frankl was talking about from the get go.
Yeah.
That's coherency.
Is the feeling of coherence aliveness in?
Ooh.
I think one of the hues of the experience of aliveness would be, oh yeah, right?
If you're a skier, You know, you're going along and then suddenly you're really in the groove.
I'm a motorcyclist.
And suddenly you're really on the line.
And I mean, you are feeling it.
I mean, everything is right where it's supposed to be.
And you have that sudden experience of fittedness, belongingness, aliveness.
And coherency is like that.
Coherency is like hitting the perfect line on the snow hitting the perfect line going into the turn.
It's the world lining up, at least briefly.
Feels great.
Yeah, it does.
I felt that.
And it is amazing.
What's even better for me, I'm going to sort of extend your example here.
I have been out on the mountain on a perfect powder day, on the backside of a mountain where I'm literally giggling and laughing out loud the whole time because I can't believe this is a real experience in my life.
The thing that has made that day better is when I look 20 feet to my right and I see my daughter doing the same thing, side by side with me.
Where does that fit in here?
Okay, so community.
First of all, you know we're big fans of Dan Siegel's work in a Mindsight Institute who figured out that we are not autonomous beings.
He would say it is an unfortunate scientific error, at best truthfully, a profoundly toxic lie, that we are autonomous beings.
The consciousness.
He's an attachment theorist that moved on to consciousness is actually collective.
We are much more of an aspen forest than a bunch of people running around in little glass tubes.
So we are part of one another.
So if I can participate in this life where I experience something meaningful, something important to me, something real, communally with somebody I care about or somebody I love like seeing my daughter, you know, just to the right of me on the slope then that is an alive making thing.
You know, I happen to be a religious guy, you know, and there's this great phrase in the New Testament which says wherever two or three of you are gathered together in my name, in God's name, I am with you.
What's going on there?
Well, does that mean, Oh, God's a leverage player.
You know, like, look, at least get three people.
They don't waste my time.
There's only one of you.
I'm not going to come to the meeting.
I don't think that's it.
I think it's like, no, no, no.
We say when we put people in design teams, it's impossible to hear yourself by yourself.
We have people read their their, their compass, their worldview and life view narratives to one another.
And they hear their own ideas and coming out of their mouth while it's being heard by another person in a way they could never hear while writing it themselves.
There's something in the interchange of communal experience that is real making.
And the reason we have a whole, the fourth of the four categories.
They're not the only categories of meaning making, but these four wonder coherence, flow and community we think are ones that are ripe with opportunity that almost everybody can get their hands on.
It's all the low hanging fruit.
So for God's sake, don't miss these four.
And formative community is, is where people get together to become.
They're not here to transact together.
They're not here just to be entertained together.
We're here to become together, to share that lived experience.
So when you and your daughter are having somewhat an entertaining experience, but really in a live-making experience, both doing the same thing at the same time and this is bone of my bone and flesh of my flesh and it's really this incredibly resonant moment that allows you to feel like
I mean, Jonathan, the dad next to his snowboarding daughter, is more Jonathan than Jonathan alone.
Right?
Yeah, 100%.
I mean, way thicker, way thicker.
Yeah.
It's great.
What are the qualities of community that elevate it to the level of being a genuinely meaningful contributor to this feeling?
So this really comes out of my work.
So I haven't taught the undergrads for a while at Stanford.
The last 10 years I've been teaching the DCI fellows, the Distinguished Careers Institute, which is a very fancy name for the gap year for grownups.
So if you're 45 to 90, mostly 55 to 75, and you're thinking, now what?
You want to stop out for a year and think deeply about that?
Stanford will take your rather large check and let you be a fellow, take a bunch of classes, wander around, talk to your colleagues and chat with me, the life design guy, a little bit.
About now, what are we going to do?
And there was this really interesting outcome, which was they have all these programs, these great classes, these research things, and these are pretty sharp people.
And at the end of the couple of months, they did this for a calendar year.
The question was, so was this good?
Oh, yeah, we love it.
And what's the best part?
Oh, for sure, the community.
Hmm.
The relationships.
And I've debriefed 10 of these cohorts on this question.
And I confront them.
I kind of go, you're telling me that the relationships are the best part.
Not only are the relationships the best part, but these relationships are of a quality and a nature I have never experienced before.
And my response to that was bullshit.
I'm not.
You guys have all built corporate cultures.
You've got huge networks.
How many of you get 15 calls a week from people who miss you and wish you'd come back home?
Everybody raises their hand.
Most of them are married and have families and kids.
You guys have huge communities.
And you're telling me that these 37 other people you never met, that some Yahoo admissions officer at Stanford you know nothing about, invited you to get in there.
And six weeks after you meet these people, they're the best friends you've ever had in your life.
They go, yeah.
Justify your answer.
So, as I researched into that, what it turns out is and this is why we call this thing formative community that almost none of them have ever been in this particular relation.
So I said there are three kinds of community.
There's social community.
Let's get together and have a good time.
Lovely.
Even loving.
Collaborative community.
Let's get something done together.
Very, very real making.
Very wonderful community.
Let's get together and become better together, become our better self.
So if I'm a DCI fellow, the fundamental posture is, well, hi, my name's Ann.
Who are you?
Well, I'm Fritz.
Okay, Fritz, well, what are you up to?
And Fritz says, and why are you here?
Well, I want to grow into this.
How can I help you?
So everybody, number one, receives one another unjudgingly at face value, thing one.
And then thing two, how can I be a part of you becoming more you?
No transaction at all.
You know, everybody's in it for becoming their more authentic selves.
And particularly because most of these people are successful, everybody wants something from them.
They're in transactions 99% of the time.
So a group of people who want nothing from them other than to be with them and to potentially contribute to enabling them to growing further into their sincere selves they've never experienced before.
And frankly, they're total strangers.
And some of them.
Their personalities are radically different and they would never have picked each other.
But that commitment, that rubric of we're going to live into this together, allows them to have this experience.
So that's what we think is the kind of community that frankly, everybody can get their hands on pretty easily if you find the right group.
Yeah, I so agree with this.
And you and I have talked about this over the years.
For five years we ran this sort of experiment where we called Camp GLP, where we brought something grownups together in a kid's sleepaway camp for four days at the end of every summer.
And it was interesting because we would offer you for people to sign up.
You know like they would sign up, they'd pay their admission and then we had 40 40 something different workshops and activities and lectures and stuff like this, and they would sign up and they would reserve their spots and yeah, and they would sign up and in their mind, they're signing up because this is a learning experience.
I get to go and i do the thing, i learn things and maybe i'll meet people.
And what we saw happen every single year is people would get halfway through the first day and then they just start to blow off all the things they signed up for And we're like what's happening here?
And what we realized is they thought that they were coming for a particular reason.
That sounded rational and justified the investment.
But as soon as they got there and they realized that this was a container that was safe, that was nourishing, that was compassionate, that gathered these people,
And all they wanted to do was hang out and talk to them and share their life experiences and see what are you up to and who are you.
I mean, one of my favorite stories from this is two women, one from Australia, one from Canada, who came to camp one year.
They left literally like best friends for life.
They are to this day and they they emailed us a couple weeks later and they said you know, like we were on the train back to new york city after this because they were flying out to their relative places, i realized for the first time we had no idea what either one of us did for a living or any of the practical elements of either of our lives.
Yeah, it just didn't come up.
It was about something bigger and deeper and richer and more nourishing.
And One of my unfair ways of dividing the world into two groups is there are communities of people who are hanging out to rehearse their answer.
Like, aren't we right?
This is so great.
I love the way we do this.
And there are communities of people who are getting together to live their question.
And becomeers, people committed to becoming... are living into a question.
In fact, we recommend you actually articulate what are the critical questions you're living into now.
Not the problems you're solving, like how much does it cost to do this?
But you know, like for me right now, my small formative community group has been gathering for 51 years.
We met this morning.
I formed the group in 1974.
And we're still at, and we're now, I'm the oldest guy, I'm about to turn 73.
And so we're all entering our 70s.
And so the question is, how do we elder well?
What does it mean to elder well?
So what are the questions that are drawing us into this next step?
Yeah, now that resonates so deeply.
Let's round this out by talking about flow a little bit.
You mentioned it a number of times through our conversation.
When most people hear the word flow, and I think a lot of us have been exposed to the concept.
Of course, yeah.
A lot of us also are exposed to the work of Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi.
And the word is often offered up in a performance context.
But you have a really different lens on this.
Yeah, we're trying to really free this thing up.
I mean, Mihaly is not wrong.
He defined the flow channel of where the flow experience could happen, may not, which is mostly where the challenge of the task I'm doing and my skill set are almost equal.
So I'm really right at the edge of my capability, preferably at the higher end.
And that allows me to enter into flow, which is this deep engagement.
Time disappears.
I become one with the task.
You know, there's this real live-making experience of it.
But it's elusive, and it's a high-performance thing.
And you can create the conditions, but you can't ensure that you'll actually be in flow.
That's the way most people think of it.
And that's not wrong, except it's not right enough.
Hmm.
Because what are you really doing there?
And first of all, our argument is well, that's the state of flow, your psychological state of being in flow.
Where is it that you are when you're doing that?
That's why we called it the flow world.
The flow world, which has to be in the present moment.
The reason time disappears in the flow world is because you are entirely in the present moment.
And the present moment, frankly, is eternity.
It's not a lot of time.
It's just... the endless now, right?
It's now o'clock again.
That's what's going on in flow.
Now, the problem with it is it's so elusive and it's so high performance.
So our argument is because he would say, by the way, when your skill set is below the task, you're bored and that kicks you out of flow.
When your skill set is above, when you're more skilled than the problem, you get bored.
When you're less skilled than the problem, you get anxious.
So either boredom or anxiety kicks you out.
And our argument is those are actually choices.
So let's say I'm bored by chopping these onions or filling out this tax form.
Well, I can choose just not to worry about that.
I can choose for the next five minutes.
I am just going to chop these onions.
I'm going to.
I'm going to look through my wonder glasses at the amazing carbon steel knife and I'm going to feel the actual feedback of the different layers of the onion as the knife goes.
I'm going to allow myself to follow all the way into this thing as an act of mental discipline and By not worrying about the other.
When is this going to be done?
This is such a waste of my time.
Couldn't we hire somebody to do this?
I'm going to choose to lean all the way.
And we call that simple flow.
Simple flow is just allowing yourself to have permission to fully participate in the thing right in front of you.
Now it may not be what we call apex flow, the highest thing in Csikszentmihalyi's chart, but you can still really learn how to be much more present to what you're doing, all by an act of mental discipline.
And you want to give yourself a chance for that to actually work.
And even when you're a little over your head, like, oh, I'm learning.
I now have failure immunity because I'm just a learner and it's okay that I'm making a mistake.
I can still be, oh, I did it wrong.
No, no, no.
Stop all that.
Just like, oh, how interesting.
So we really do believe you can enter into this high degree of engagement called flow, which is an alive making experience.
And by any time I'm more alive, I'm more human.
That makes me feel more meaningful, because my agency and my existential reality are being reinforced.
Particularly if by the way, the thing I'm doing might be an act of coherency.
This moved me purposefully toward writing a book about meaning making or, last night, going to dinner with the CEO of a homeless service center, trying to help them be more effective in saving people's lives who are dying on the street, you know.
So that's, that's great.
But no matter what you're doing, and hopefully it's purposeful, be more present to it.
And so flow.
We think the flow world, the flow channel should be much wider, by simplifying our relationship with it, which is just a matter of choice, which brings us back to the mindset stuff, which is about acceptance and availability.
And it just invites such a broader swath of humanity into the experience of flow, rather than saying well, the conditions aren't perfect for this magical state called flow.
You kind of look at it and say well, how do I make them what they need to be so that I can experience this thing, even for a hot second?
It's reframing the task as not the activity or the goal of the outcome that was presented to me, but it's reframing it as –
How can I make the task to be as present as fully possible in the moment that I'm in, no matter what the conditions are?
And that gives so much of the agency back to you by doing that.
It really is about having more agency, which, again, is more human-making.
I mean my mentor, now 92, actually in Colorado is a really wise guy and was frequently sought out for his wisdom.
So he'd find himself sitting across the table from people in dire circumstances.
I mean the company's blowing up and I think my wife's going to leave me and the kids suddenly got a horrible disease.
Whatever, you know these really tough things to which there are no solutions of course.
And and then at one point almost always in the conversation he would go okay, well boy well, that sounds pretty tough, Jonathan.
I just have one question for you. how's the coffee?
And the person goes, what?
Well, how's the coffee?
I think it's fine.
You think it's fine?
Why don't you find out?
Take a sip.
And they go, yeah, it's fine.
No, no, no.
Take it again.
Taste the coffee.
And they go, oh.
You know, and he brings them into the present moment of.
For God's sake, taste the coffee in your cup.
You know, and then...
He would say, okay, now, and they say, okay, and how are you right now?
And then he would get them into their present self not the person, completely overwhelmed with their problem, and then ask that person so what do you think you can do next?
And they always knew what the next step was.
And they always realized they couldn't solve the huge problem.
But all they can do is take the right next step.
And so this idea of learning how to apply agency and allowing both our awakened and our achieving brains to populate the worlds that we're in isn't just a little sideshow or a taking up.
It's actually becoming your best self.
Yeah, the little show is the big show.
Yeah.
And we're coming back tomorrow.
Exactly.
Feels like a good place for us to come full circle.
I have asked you this question once before, but it's many years ago and a lot of life has unfolded since then.
But in this container of Good Life Project, if I offer up the phrase to live a good life, what comes up?
Be here now.
Hmm.
Hey, before you leave, if you love this episode, you'll also love the conversation we had with Dan Pink about regret, reflection and using inner signals to guide a more meaningful life.
You can find a link to that episode in the show notes.
This episode of Good Life Project was produced by executive producers Lindsay Fox and me, Jonathan Fields.
Editing help by Alejandro Ramirez and Troy Young.
Christopher Carter crafted our theme music.
And, of course, if you haven't already done so, please go ahead and follow Good Life Project in your favorite listening app or on YouTube too.
If you found this conversation interesting or valuable and inspiring, chances are you did because you're still listening here.
Do me a personal favor, a seven second favor.
Share it with just one person.
I mean, if you want to share it with more, that's awesome too, but just one person even then invite them to talk with you about what you've both discovered, to reconnect and explore ideas that really matter, because that's how we all come alive together.
Until next time, I'm Jonathan Fields signing off for Good Life Project.
