This is an iHeart Podcast. One helps you keep more money in your wallet with no fees or minimums on checking accounts and no overdraft fees.
Just ask the Capital One Bank guy.
It's pretty much all he talks about in a good way.
He'd also tell you that this podcast is his favorite podcast too.
Thanks, Capital One Bank guy.
What's in your wallet?
Terms apply. See Capital One dot com slash bank.
Capital One N .A. member FDIC.
Hi, everybody. I picked this selection.
This is stuff you should know, co -host. September 17th, 2015, we did an episode called The Great Nuclear Winter Debate of 1983, and I picked this one because I don't remember even recording it.
What in the world were they debating in 1983 about the great nuclear winter?
It was probably just nuclear winter and the great refers to the debate now that I see how it's worded, but you know what I mean.
I guess I'm going to learn right around with you because I'm about out to listen to it right now.
Welcome to Stuff You Should Know, a production of iHeart Radio.
Hey, and welcome to the podcast. I'm Josh Clark.
There's Charles W. Chuck Bryant.
Jerry's over there somewhere off in the ether.
But I don't think on ether, just in the ether.
Oh, man. She's trying not to breathe right now.
if we had a tank of ether in here.
It'd be a much different podcast. Josh and Chuck's EtherCats.
Do they put those things in tanks?
Oh, I don't know. Surely, yeah, right?
No? Is it like in the bottles still, like the 1800s?
I don't know. I don't know.
Yeah, I think you just have it in a little milk bottle.
You put it in a rag, you put it in your face.
And then go to Happy Town.
Yeah, exactly. If there's any pharmacists out there that want to set us straight, let us know how ether comes these days.
It's probably a gas.
Yeah, I imagine. It's not like Hunter S.
Thompson. I think we talked about it before in anesthesia.
Probably. It's like ether gas.
What a weird start.
Yeah, that has nothing to do with what we're about to talk about.
Yeah, I was trying to relate it, but there really is nothing.
One of my favorite, favorite topics of all time, nuclear holocaust from the Cold War.
Yeah. We did one on the Cold War, didn't we?
Oh, we've done several.
uh yeah we we batted around this thing but we've never done a full nuclear holocaust podcast have we no and nuclear holocaust is that's not quite right that's not the right way to put it because what we're talking about is actually the after effects from a nuclear holocaust isn't that the holocaust if you want to be a purist the nuclear holocaust is the immediate destruction as a result of exploding nuclear bombs over like population centers and stuff.
Oh, I didn't know that.
I thought it was the whole kit and caboodle.
I should say, if you're a purist and you want to say it from my opinion, that's what a nuclear holocaust is.
Okay. I think we know what's going on here.
Yeah, Robert Lamb wrote this.
Stuff to blow your mind.
Yeah, I have to say I said, man, way to go on that one.
That was a good one.
You told him that? I did.
I actually uttered those words.
What did he say? Thanks, man.
That's nice The thing that gets me about Nuclear Winter Which we will talk about in depth What fascinates me about it Just as much as The Nuclear Winter itself Chuck Is the controversy The debate That arose from it throughout the 80's There was a huge debate Debate on the severity Yeah debate on whether It was something to worry about or not Yeah well I looked up because I was like Like does anyone think that this is a myth, an outright myth?
And from what I saw in my research is that no, this is fact.
It's just a dispute.
What's a dispute is the scenario and the severity of what would happen.
But no one says like, no, there would be no nuclear winter.
There would be no problems after a nuclear bomb.
So there used to be, like back in the early 80s when this was a huge new thing, there was a group of scientists who were hawkish, very much in favor of the U .S. building up its nuclear arsenal as much as possible and started a basically a PR letter writing campaign to discredit the science behind this.
And they thought – These guys don't know what they're talking about.
So what did they think, that the bomb would drop, and then like the next day, the birds would be out?
They said, initially, yeah, that was kind of their position, was just to poke holes in this, and that it wasn't legitimate science, right?
Yeah, it didn't sound like it.
And then they, ultimately, the whole point was that this came from an argument over whether the U .S. should engage in the SDI, the Strategic Defense Initiative, or Star Wars.
Right. which is the lasers that shoot nukes from space, right?
They shoot down nukes from space.
We did a show on that, didn't we?
We did. That was another one.
But that's what the whole thing was.
It's the context of it.
It was an argument over either nuclear disarmament, which Carl Sagan and his friends were in favor of, or nuclear proliferation and the Star Wars program.
Warmongers. Right. The hippies versus the warmongers.
the weird thing is is this debate Chuck took place in the pages of like academic journals and it ended up being a fight between science and science deniers yeah it sounds like these scientists that you mentioned might have been had their coffers full from the US government potentially or private industry or something like that yeah and the thing is is they use this old chestnut where Where, so if you're a scientist, there's no certainty in anything you say.
Sure. It can always be disproven.
Remember, we talked about this in the scientific method episode.
Yeah. All your stuff can be disproven, ultimately, which is why it's just a theory.
Yeah. So no scientist is going to be like, this is 100 % certain.
Right. Well, these other scientists who are poking holes in it would point out, these guys aren't even certain, which means that there's disagreement agreement over whether we'll have a nuclear winner or not.
So they were being very disingenuous in poking holes in it by saying these scientists aren't even certain in their findings.
Well, no scientist is certain in their findings, but to the public you think, oh, well, these scientists can't say that they're certain so they must not know what they're talking about for sure.
That's dangerous. That's why we're at three minutes to midnight on the doomsday clock.
That's exactly right.
Because some people might say, well, you're not certain, so let's just not act fast enough yeah and I should say also check we should prepare for a lot of listener mail because this is a conservative flashpoint nuclear winter is long -standing one oh yeah yeah great sounds good let's talk about this all right well Robert starts where most people should start when talking about nuclear winter and that's in the atmosphere it's a very finely tuned system we have I want to say it's like homeostasis but it's not people so I guess it's like an eco stasis where the Sun just enough Sun gets through to
make things make the earth habitable and proliferate with plants and water and humans and animals and all kinds of great stuff right too much Sun even by a little bit could be catastrophic and yeah too little Sun but even by a little bit could be catastrophic right so we've thanks to humans we've struck a great balance here with the Sun a great deal made you can shine to sunshine too much Sun yeah and it's working out awesome the idea of nuclear winter is that there would be enough ash from and smoke it's really not the fallout from the nuclear bombs themselves from what I understand it's more
the smoke from the resulting fires right that would cause the blacking out of the sky and the Sun not getting through it's actually all of it yeah but everything I read across the board said it's almost 100 % the smoke right that goes on yes it's true yeah I mean you you you shouldn't negate the idea that like nuclear radiation poisoning is going to kill a lot of people oh yeah as a result but the The blacking out of the skies is due to the smoke from fire from the bomb that happened.
Right. So, this whole thing, the context of it, again, comes from the 70s.
Right, Chuck? Yeah, and 80s.
Yeah, and back in, I think, 1975, a group issued a statement that said, you know, there probably wouldn't be that big of a fallout from nuclear explosions.
implosions. A few years after that, another group, I think the first group was the National Academy of Sciences, another group said, you know what, we don't think that's exactly true.
We think that there probably is some sort of, there will be something, but our models are too primitive to say for certain what the fallout would be.
A few years after that, Carl Sagan and his crew got together and said, no, there's going to be serious consequences, and here's what they are.
Billions of lives lost. Billions and billions, right.
And one of the things they base this on, this idea on, that if you spew a bunch of smoke or particulate matter into the atmosphere, that it'll have a negative influence on the global climate is past history from volcanic eruptions.
Yes. Yes. Most notably, well, there are a few over the years, but one of the notable ones in 1883 at the time, then the Dutch East Indies, now Indonesia, Krakatoa, that volcano was massive to the tune of 36 ,000 deaths just from the volcano. And this is in Krakatoa in 1883.
Yeah, there's only like 10 people there somehow.
It's not like it was super populated.
Right. And two -thirds of Krakatoa collapsed.
The smoke rose up and warmed the global temperature, global, by 2 .2 degrees Fahrenheit.
No, it lowered it. Yeah, it lowered, sorry.
It took five years for temperatures to return to normal, and it affected, this was in Indonesia, And it actually, they think, increased the rainfall in Los Angeles by more than double that next year.
Wow. That's in L .A.
in Southern California.
So that was the Krakatoa blast from 1883, right?
Yeah. And it literally changed the color of the sky for, like, years afterward. The sky was red such that they think, you know, the scream, the painting, the scream?
Yeah. Munch? Yeah. The red sky, they think that's the way the sky looked was because of this volcano. That is so neat.
Yeah, isn't that crazy?
That guy was like, that volcano is crazy.
That's what the man is saying.
And that's just one of them.
What was the other one in - Mount Tambora.
Yeah, Indonesia once again.
Yeah. Indonesia's got bad luck with the volcanoes back in the 19th century.
And this was actually earlier in 1815.
Yeah. I remember learning about this when I was a kid because Ohio got it really bad.
A volcano went off in Indonesia in 1815.
And the following year, much of the United States did not have a summer.
It was actually called the year without a summer.
And Ohio was affected?
Yes. Oh, wow. Yeah.
There was like snow on the ground in the middle of July.
Did you learn that in state history class?
Yes, I did. I remember that.
Yeah. Yeah, Georgia state history.
That was like a full course at our school.
Yeah. Half of it was just sitting around with the teacher like staring off into the distance.
Right. I remember ours was just like a lot of talk about Crawford Long and the Civil War Yeah, we didn't talk about Crawford Long in ours.
No, because he wasn't from Georgia We talked about Anthony Wayne Yeah.
The Battle of Fallen Timbers Yeah Well that summer without a winter, year without a summer I mean.
Uh huh. And then there's some like canals and locks that donkeys used to pull barges on.
Yeah I just remember Crawford Long and a lot of racism Yeah.
Basically Yeah. That's right.
So that was Mount Tambora, the year without summer.
There have been other events like when the oil fields burned during the during the war in the early 90s.
Yeah. Apparently Carl Sagan predicted basically a nuclear winter from that.
Yeah, that's pan out.
Yeah. That's where they take some flack was it was not nearly as bad.
the fallout from that smoke as Sagan predicted.
No. But what can you do?
But predict. You're going to be wrong occasionally.
Surely you're going to be wrong.
It doesn't mean you should be like, oh, well, that smoke didn't do much, so let's start building nuclear bombs again.
Yeah. Well, that's the whole thing, Chuck.
I am so glad you said that because that's the whole mad thing to this argument.
It's like, what are you arguing in favor for?
If you're arguing against the idea of nuclear war, what precisely are you arguing for?
Yeah, like it won't be that bad?
We'll talk a little bit more about it later on in the show, what some people have argued about.
But it seems like what you say, ultimately, you're arguing in favor of more nuclear weapons.
That seems wrongheaded by definition to me.
Well, not even just that, but using them won't be as bad as you say.
Right. Not just have them, but, well, the fallout wouldn't be as bad as they all predict, so use them.
You almost get the impression like they're just like, well, let's just find out.
Let's just shoot a couple off and find out what happens.
Come on. You'll see them, right?
And then as they die from smoke inhalation, they say, I was wrong.
What have I done? Oh, goodness.
Let's take a break.
All right. Let's do.
And we'll come back, and we'll talk a little bit more about the nuclear winter.
You know, there's just something about a beautiful outdoor space that's so satisfying.
It becomes like your own backyard oasis.
It's the best, and I got to tell you, Wayfair has got everything you need to level up your outdoor space with patio sets, lounge chairs, outdoor bars, hot tubs, vavoom, fire pits, gazebos, you name it.
And, of course, string lights.
You got to have those.
Yeah. I mean, summer's a perfect time to host a nice outdoor gathering.
So you want to have a nice outdoor space to host that gathering in.
And don't be scared off about ordering big, beautiful outdoor furniture from Wayfair because with Wayfair, delivery is free and easy, even on the big stuff.
That's right. And they got a style for everybody and every home, no matter what your space is and what your budget is.
So don't wait. Make your outdoor space your dream oasis today with Wayfair and enjoy it all summer long.
head to wayfair .com right now to shop a huge outdoor selection that's w -a -y -f -a -i -r .com wayfair every style every home hey everybody we want to talk to you about Squarespace and in particular if you have a great idea that you want to sell on the web well Squarespace makes it easy to sell access to content on your websites that's right you can do online courses you can do blogs videos memberships You can even earn recurring revenue by gating your content behind a paywall.
Simply set the price and choose whether to charge a one -time fee or a subscription for access.
That's right, and you can get your content discovered fast with integrated SEO tools.
Every Squarespace website is optimized to be indexed with meta descriptions, an auto -generated sitemap, and more, so you show up more often to more people in global search engine results.
Just go to squarespace .com slash stuff and you can get a free trial.
And when you're ready to launch, use our offer code STUFF, S -T -U -F -F, to save 10 % off your first purchase of a website or a domain.
In Orlando, meetings reach another level thanks to a growing list of award -winning restaurants, a world -class convention center, a great hotel community, easy access through the airport, and, of course, the weather.
That's right, Chuck.
Andrew Moyes, VP of Fan Expo HQ, had this to say about Orlando.
Orlando, often we will bring our entire team to Orlando for the event.
And that includes our executive level team members as well.
And we're able to give them a great experience with luxury hotels, special restaurants, all those key things to feed into the proper executive experience.
He also said that Orlando's easy airport access and close proximity to hotels and transportation make it a top choice for hosting major events.
And while you may know Orlando for its attractions, industries like healthcare, aerospace, and advanced manufacturing Make it a hub for cutting -edge businesses.
Or, in the words of Mr. Moyes, Orlando can really be that destination where you can innovate, collaborate, and look to the future.
And that's what makes Orlando unbelievably real.
Learn more at OrlandoForBusiness .com.
I said nuclear and just but I know I heard before the break it was good stuff all right I just want to point that out because some people might think it was serious no and now that you said it was in jest some people are like what a jerk maybe that man was my hero I posted something on Facebook the other day that said you're sciencing wrong as a joke.
And people called me out.
They were like, you can't use science as a verb.
I thought in the 21st century you could use everything as a verb.
Yeah, that's true. Yeah, people have gotten extremely serious.
Extremely self -serious.
I'm a not self -serious person, so I don't fit in today's world.
You're a relic. You're an old dinosaur.
Just a stupid laughing dinosaur.
Speaking of dinosaurs.
Yeah, well, I guess we should talk about the KT boundary extinction event which was some people some in science have Theorized that that's what happened to the dinosaurs was there was an impact winter Not quite the same as a nuclear winter.
But the same effect as a nuclear winter due to the impact of of an asteroid.
That's right. And that would have happened at the border of the Cretaceous and Tertiary periods.
Again, when the dinosaurs all died off.
Still, inexplicably.
There's no definitive answer.
Again, though, we're talking science.
No one found a journal.
Dear Diary, today something is streaking through the sky and it's making everyone nervous.
It's very hot now, but I noticed the dinosaurs are dying, so that's good.
Oh, this is a dinosaur writing, in my opinion.
Oh, oh. So that's bad.
Right. Right. Okay, so let's talk nuclear winter, right?
You kind of said it earlier, but the whole idea behind nuclear winter is that if you shoot off nuclear bombs, especially a bunch of them, you have to understand at the time that these scientists were really starting to debate this there were like 70 ,000 nuclear warheads like yeah many many times more nuclear warheads in existence in like the early 80s than there were today yeah and when they started debating them they really took up this cause because the Reagan administration was saying we need the this Star Wars program because we can prevent almost with, you know, 90 % certainty a Soviet nuclear
attack. Right, with laser guns.
Exactly. And so the scientists who were concerned scientists, basically anti -nuke scientists, said, wait a minute, there's something that you guys aren't thinking through here.
If you do that, the Soviets are going to say, well, wait a minute, If this thing is 90 % effective, then we need to build up our nuclear arsenal so that when we shoot everything we got at them, still that 10 % will totally annihilate the United States.
That the presence of the Star Wars program was going to put the nuclear arms race into even higher gear than it already was.
So they very much took it upon themselves to tackle this with science but also publicize it and sell it to the public.
And it's that that's stuck in the craw of a lot of other scientists, but particularly scientists who were in favor of nuclear proliferation as a matter of national defense.
That's right. The point of it is when they tackled this, they said, here's the big problem with it.
If you shoot off a bunch of nuclear bombs, a lot, a lot, a lot of nuclear bombs, which could totally go off as far as the nuclear war is concerned, Yeah.
It's going to cause a lot of smoke to enter the atmosphere, and that is where this domino effect is going to create this global catastrophe.
And the whole outcome of it is based on the number of nukes that you shoot off.
Right. Which is basically what Carl Sagan and his buddy Richard Turco divided the different types of nuclear winter into.
That's right. Mr. Sagan and Mr. Turco, are they doctors?
Let's just call everyone a doctor.
uh well yeah he was carl sagan was a doctor of astrochemistry i believe and richard turko is um he's a veterinarian i can't remember what he was uh they wrote a book called a path where no man thought a path where no man thought right and uh that seemed like there would be one more word there.
And they have one, two, three, four, five, six scenarios for what a nuclear winter might look like, ranging from minimal to extreme.
And minimal, best case scenario, which is just a little bit of a nuclear attack.
Not many bombs going off.
Maybe like, let's say, Hiroshima or Nagasaki.
Which we'll talk about.
Those were like 21 kilotons.
Yeah. That means that there will be minimal cloud cover, not much environmental impact globally, and the targeted areas would be wiped out, of course.
But the world itself would not have big consequences.
Right. Atmospherically.
So if you are talking nuclear war, especially a Cold War nuclear war, that was a fairly unlikely scenario.
Yeah. By the time the early 1980s rolled around and people started talking about the concept of a nuclear winner, those Hiroshima and Nagasaki -level nuclear bombs were, like, attached to the average fighter jet.
They were considered, like, just tactical.
Like, you just could shoot them off on a battlefield if you needed to.
Yeah. So the idea that it would just amount to that is...
Unlikely. It was, but...
They're being nice.
That's the best case scenario.
They're trying to cover all avenues here.
Yes. Number two is marginal, and that's a few detonations, again, in the northern hemisphere.
And they said it would lower the temperature by a few degrees, and there would be some crops and some agriculture that suffered and probably some famine.
Yeah. But it would not, oh, black rain, of course.
Yeah, who wants that?
Did happen in Hiroshima.
Yes. They drank it.
and died from drinking it.
You have to go... Yes, because it was radioactive rain.
Yeah, but they drank it because they were thirsty because they had no water.
Yes. It's devastating.
You and everyone should have to go to the city of Hiroshima.
Like, it is amazing what they've done to preserve what happened there as like a teaching lesson for everyone.
Yeah. It's really moving.
We should have one of those here.
We should. Instead, people are like, Like, yeah, Japan forced the U .S. to drop the bomb.
It's fact. Right. Which is not correct.
Right. So, black rain would happen in that marginal scenario.
Man, this is a really political episode, isn't it?
I think any time you tackle nuclear war, it's going to be divisive.
Yeah. Because some people think it's awesome.
Nuke the whales. Got to nuke something.
Things below the equator in that scenario in the southern hemisphere would be just fine.
so here's something that I found really interesting and wrong in this analysis of it Sagan I guess he was strictly talking about atmospheric effects yeah but he mentions like famine and stuff like that the the thing is that would have a global effect for sure yeah the rest of the world depends in large part on North American wheat and corn yeah so if there's a nuclear fallout in North America that affects our crop yields dramatically and causes famine in the US it's gonna cause famine elsewhere so yeah yeah I think what he's saying is as far as climatologically speaking yeah what he and Turco
are saying is as long as you're not shooting off nuclear bombs in the southern hemisphere it's gonna climatologically speaking be unaffected right or largely unaffected because the wind goes down to the equator and then back up like the equator separates the hemispheres as far as the atmosphere is concerned yeah totally there would still be global troubles yes uh but in reading all these scenarios it made me really want to move to australia well that's another thing too how many people would be like uh i need to get out of the united states so i'm moving down to mexico or i'm moving down to brazil
or i'm moving down to australia and then the infrastructure in those countries are just super stressed because the northern hemisphere that survived is suddenly moving down to the southern hemisphere yeah that's another widespread effect uh mexico would help you too much though No. Well, weren't they like super helpful in Independence Day?
Was it Independence Day or the morning, or no, the day after tomorrow?
Everybody starts having to move south because North America is just frozen ice sheet?
Yeah, but I just mean as far as you'd have to go pretty far south, further south than Mexico if you want to escape the atmospheric fallout.
Oh, you're right. So Ecuador.
Yeah, like what is it, like half of Africa and South America are in the southern hemisphere?
Yeah. Yeah, it's true.
Probably not half. Yeah, roughly.
So the Northern Hemisphere would show up at the Southern Hemisphere's doorstep.
It'd be like Christmas in July.
We'll get used to it.
That's right. Your drain goes the other way when you release the water from the tub.
Yeah. Neato. And I know Christmas doesn't fall in July.
It was a metaphorical statement.
Yeah, I get you. Nominal nuclear winners, number three, that is what they consider the low -end full -scale nuclear war.
Right. but still full scale, 6 ,000 to 12 ,000 nuclear weapons.
That's all. Just 6 ,000 to 12 ,000 nuclear bombs.
Right, and we're talking a megaton or more bombs, and a megaton was, I think, 50 Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombs combined.
Wow. So 12 ,000 times 50 of those for this kind of nominal nuclear war.
Yeah, that's a lot of zeros.
Yeah. They predicted noon sunlight would be about a third of what it was.
Global temperature drops of 18 degrees.
That's bad news, my friend.
It would destroy a lot of the ozone layer.
And, again, the southern hemisphere wouldn't experience major climactic change.
It's cut to the southern hemisphere.
They're all at the beach. There's, like, tropical music playing.
But they have no wheat.
Who needs wheat when you've got rum drinks?
Ooh, that's a T -shirt.
Josh Clark said that one.
Number four, substantial.
That is full -scale nuclear war.
Freezing temperatures, big -time fallout.
The whole day would be like it's overcast. Yeah.
Billions of humans dead.
Billions? Billions and billions.
Species going extinct.
And finally, possible damage to the southern hemisphere.
Finally. possibly right uh and then the last two we can just bunch together i think severe and extreme um less than one percent of the sunlight uh getting through for months and months on end global temperature dropping no photosynthesis happening right every crop dying all life perishing let's just go ahead and wrap it up right there yeah as robert puts it um most of the planet's life would perish within the chilly confines of this black atmospheric tomb.
Yeah, he's got a little Lovecraft in him, doesn't he?
He does. This unnameable tomb.
Chuckers, let's take another break and then we will come back and talk about the fallout from nuclear winter theory.
Hey, everybody. So when you get asked, what is Odoo?
What comes to mind?
Well, I'll tell you, Odoo is a bit of everything.
Odoo is a suite of business management software that some people say is like fertilizer because the way it promotes growth.
But you know, some people also say that Odoo is like a magic beanstalk because it grows with your company and is also magically affordable.
Oh, but then again, you could look at Odoo in terms of how its individual software programs are a lot like building blocks.
Whatever your business needs, manufacturing, accounting, HR programs, you can build a custom software suite that's perfect for your company.
So what is Odoo? Well, Odoo is a bit of everything.
Odoo is a fertilizer, magic beanstalk, building blocks for business.
Yeah, that's it. Which means that Odoo is exactly what every business needs.
Learn more and sign up now at odoo .com.
That's O -D -O -O dot com.
In Orlando, meetings reach another level thanks to a growing list of award -winning restaurants, a world -class convention center, a great hotel community, easy access through the airport, and, of course, the weather.
That's right, Chuck.
Andrew Moyes, VP of Fan Expo HQ, had this to say about Orlando.
Often we will bring our entire team to Orlando for the event.
And that includes our executive -level team members as well.
And we're able to give them a great experience with luxury hotels, special restaurants, all those key things to feed into the proper executive experience.
He also said that Orlando's easy airport access and close proximity to hotels and transportation make it a top choice for hosting major events.
And while you may know Orlando for its attractions, industries like healthcare, aerospace, and advanced manufacturing make it a hub for cutting -edge businesses.
Or, in the words of Mr. Moyes, Orlando can really be that destination where you can innovate, collaborate, and look to the future.
And that's what makes Orlando unbelievably real.
Learn more at OrlandoForBusiness .com.
If you're driving right now, look around.
I'll wait. All those cars you see, they're all probably on AutoTrader .com.
That's right. That's because AutoTrader has the largest selection of new cars, used cars, electric cars, even flying cars.
Well, actually not flying cars yet, but as soon as those get invented, they'll be on AutoTrader.
AutoTrader has been attracting car shoppers for years now, and for good reason.
Not only do they have supercharged search features that allow you to easily find your perfect car, AutoTrader has Kelley Blue Book MyWallet.
From credit scores to down payments to interest rates, we all know that car buying requires a lot of math.
So enter MyWallet on AutoTrader.
That's right. It's a tool that helps you know exactly how much you'll pay each month for your car, so you never have to do car math again.
You're welcome. So whether you're into timeless classics or the latest trends, or whether you just want something practical with no surprise costs.
If you see a car you like, it's probably on AutoTrader.
See it. Find it. AutoTrader.
So, like we said, Carl Sagan and his friends got together and basically took it upon themselves to educate the public about the potential catastrophe that could happen as a result of nuclear war.
Everybody before was like, yeah, that would really suck to be in a city that a nuclear bomb went off on.
But maybe it wouldn't be my city.
I live in Schenectady, New York.
No one's going to bomb Schenectady.
So I'm probably going to be okay.
okay, these guys said, hey, Western civilization, not just in the U .S., but also the USSR, that's not necessarily the case.
You, too, will be affected.
There's going to be big problems after a nuclear war, so much so that let's make sure that our leaders never do this.
Wake up, basically, is what they were doing.
And so Sagan and his friends created a paper, and it's now called the TTAPS paper after all of their names.
Right? Turco, Toon, Ackerman, Pollock, and Sagan.
Okay. And they wrote this paper and had it published in Science, the preeminent scientific journal in the United States.
Yeah. It was a big deal.
Yeah. They also held a very well -publicized conference.
difference. And Carl Sagan, apparently without the the group's knowledge or blessing, went off and also wrote a piece in Parade magazine.
Oh, wow. Yeah. To make sure that every Dick and Jane in the U .S. knew about this.
It was like a three page article about the nuclear winner, which is a new term at the time, complete with illustrations where like the the earth was like this dead dead, lifeless, what's called like a gray chalk billiard ball, basically.
Yeah. Just really scary stuff.
Sure. And then he also simultaneously wrote another longer piece that was in Foreign Affairs that's a little more wonky.
So Sagan went off after writing this scientific paper and publicized it to policymakers and to the American public.
Yeah, this is the early 1980s.
Yes, it's 1983. And this was before all the science was in.
This is from the first paper.
Before the first paper's conference was even held, right?
And a lot of people, including people who were on his side about this issue, were really mad at him because it opened up this group and the whole idea of nuclear winter to allegations that they were fear -mongering and that they were basically trying to sell the public on science, which is, you know, that's not what science does.
Right. Yes, pure science is about research and coming up with facts, and whether they're popular or unpopular, it doesn't matter.
Science is science, and fact is fact, right?
Yeah. A good theory is a good theory.
But these guys, again, were concerned that something really, really bad could happen, and they went to the trouble of taking it upon themselves to advertise it to the public.
But again, Sagan going off and doing this, it really opened them up for a lot of allegations and debate that took place afterward. word. Yeah, but some say that their work in the T -TAPS report actually did help cool things down in the Cold War a little bit.
Yeah, and I mean, it wasn't just these American scientists.
They worked with Soviet scientists as well, and apparently sometimes it went good, sometimes didn't go so well, but both sides were working on this issue, and the fact that it got so much publicity actually created a firestorm of back and forth in the scientific community, and this issue ended up getting really well studied.
Yeah, it did. And seven years later, they revised the report in 1990, and it had new, more modernized data, and it wasn't quite as dire, which some critics were like, all right, this is a little more reasonable.
Yes, they revised it to call it the nuclear autumn.
Yeah. And everyone loves autumn.
Yeah, autumn's great.
Autumn all the time, that'd be wonderful.
Oh, man, that would be wonderful.
beautiful. That'd be Chuck's world.
And they there are disagreements over that still.
And they basically there's a few four variables that are always the factors that are the unknowns.
And it's really they're all to me kind of one four versions of the same variable, which is we don't know how much smoke there would be.
Yes, we just don't know.
And number one is how much material is there to burn so the idea is you drop a bomb on a city a nuclear bomb and everything catches on fire and that creates tremendous amounts of smoke but since these are all theoretical and you don't know what would happen with you drop something the size on like let's say a major city like New York they're like what would be there to burn like we just don't know well that's that's yes so if you dropped it on the city is it an old city that's that isn't super supermodern and therefore isn't built out of like lots of plastic that can get into the atmosphere and really
mess things up. Yeah.
Like the really bad stuff.
Yeah. If it's an old city, maybe the burning wouldn't be so bad even after a nuclear Holocaust. Um, or maybe you're not shooting nuclear bombs to cities, but to other nuclear installations that are out in the middle of like nowhere in Nebraska.
Right. Um, because we have, I mean, we've, there's been like 2000 nuclear nuclear bombs detonated, but only two on its cities.
Right. Exactly. Everything else had been out over the ocean or out in the middle of nowhere, and there's been no fire.
Right. The assumption is that, though, if you shot a nuclear bomb at a modern city, a lot of really toxic smoke would be produced.
Oh, yeah. That's probably the worst -case scenario in both the immediate nuclear holocaust and the fallout, the nuclear winter as a result, because of all the smoke that would be created.
I mean, look at the fallout from 9 -11, and that was two buildings.
Right. You know? Yeah.
The second variable is how much would remain in the atmosphere and then how much goes back to the Earth.
No idea. Yeah, no one really knows that at all.
How much sunlight would be deflected.
Again, just theorizing.
And you can go back and plug in these numbers.
The problem is, if you're a detractor of nuclear winter theory, you would say, that's a guess.
Right. where'd you get that number yeah you know and you could take every number and come up with a different model for each one they usually don't do that but even still it's like which one's going to be the one and again it goes back to how much smoke would there be to begin with yeah and then finally when did it happen if it was actually in winter perhaps it's not so bad yeah nuclear Nuclear winter and winter, ironically, is the best case scenario.
The best case scenario of the bad scenarios.
Right. So they did initially back off of their findings.
They said that there could initially be like a 35 to 40 degree drop in global temperatures.
It's Celsius. Yeah.
So we're talking like 70 degrees, 72 degrees Fahrenheit drop in temperatures.
And that's for a full -on nuclear war.
Yeah. Yes. Yes. Later on, as they revised their findings, and again, more and more scientists got involved and studied this issue, they came upon what seemed to be a consensus that you could probably count on something like a 15 degree Celsius drop in global temperatures, which would be substantial and could still have widespread effects, right?
Yeah. So from this debate, nuclear winter kind of got settled on.
and there was a scientific consensus that came about.
And there was also consensus that not only would there be huge problems inland, there would be oceanic problems as well because one of the great casualties of detonating nuclear bombs is the ozone layer.
The fireball from the blast burns up nitrogen, converting it to nitrogen oxide.
Nitrogen oxide just punches holes, basically chemically burns the ozone layer.
So then when all that smoke that's acting as like an umbrella that's blocking out the sunlight falls back to Earth, all that particulate matter falls back to Earth and is radioactive, by the way.
Yeah. Now the sunlight that does come through is way hotter and has way more UV light than it had before the nuclear bombs went off.
Because we had our little delicate balance that's now disrupted.
Exactly. Yeah. The problem with that for the oceans is that that UV light would likely be too intense for phytoplankton at the ocean surface.
Well, that is the keystone species for the ocean aquatic environments.
The ecosystems all start with phytoplankton.
Zoo plankton feed on phytoplankton.
Little fish feed on zoo plankton.
Larger fish feed on little fish and so on and so on.
So if you get rid of the phytoplankton, you're in big trouble.
Big trouble. So there would be huge ramifications, and science came to a consensus on this.
But again, it was attacked very early on by nuclear proliferation hawks as basically being against the interests of United States national security.
And then later on, it continued to be attacked.
It became a customary traditional flashpoint among conservatives as a great example of the lengths that hippie environmental scientists will go to to dupe the American public into being scared about nuclear bombs and just nuclear stuff in general.
Like Michael Crichton famously attacked it in a 2003 speech. And his whole thing, he was very famously a climate denier.
He was a climate skeptic until his death, as far as I know.
Was he dead? Yeah. And he wrote some great books.
But he was also like contrarian by nature is what he said as well.
But I get the impression that he tended to land on the more conservative, anti -environmental side.
Oh, yeah. And on this case, he also attacked the nuclear winner as well.
Well, and what he accused these guys of doing is creating science by consensus, right?
That, to me, is, that's just like a one -two sucker punch. So, the initial scientists that challenged nuclear winner said, you guys can't even agree.
There's no consensus.
Like, you can't be certain in what you're saying.
So, therefore, we don't need to take you seriously.
So, they said, okay, you know what?
We're going to get all these scientists around the world together to study this issue, and we're going to come to a consensus.
And when they did, years later, guys like Michael Crichton said, you guys are practicing science by consensus and politicizing science.
It's not real science.
So it was like they were very much damned if they did and damned if they didn't.
And ultimately you just have to kind of decide, is it worth the risk?
Maybe we can't say for certain.
And at the time, you couldn't say for certain.
And what's cool is that some of these same climate scientists are still at work, and they have come up with fairly recent models using very sophisticated climate models compared to the stuff they were using back in the 80s and even the 90s.
The stuff they're using now says, actually, we think nuclear winter might be worse than was initially predicted.
Yeah, and even if it's not a full -scale nuclear war, I think the worry, there's not as much worry these days for something like that.
And what the worry is now is that some rogue nation gets a hold of one, or maybe even not a rogue nation, just India and Pakistan drop a couple of nuclear bombs.
Well, that's the model, and that is entirely possible.
I think a one -megaton detonation is what they did this model on, and it had a substantial effect.
Yeah, they said 10 years of smoke clouds and a three -year temperature drop of about 2 .25 degrees Fahrenheit.
Which doesn't sound like much, but if you go back and you read that scientist's study, his executive summary of the study, he points out that that kind of drop ultimately equals a shortened growing season by 10 to 20 days.
Yeah. And that last 10 to 20 days makes or breaks a crop.
Like, that means you can either harvest it or it dies before it matures and can be harvested.
And so even just a couple of degrees can lead to widespread crop failure.
Yeah. But this is just if India and Pakistan shoot 50 bombs at one another in a regional war.
It could have that effect around the world.
So we mentioned Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
Those are the only places we can look.
But like we pointed out, the bombs were so different back then.
It's not the best comparison.
But as far as looking at what kind of fires could happen, you can't tell a whole lot.
in Hiroshima there were more fires than in Nagasaki just because of the way the geography is in the two cities but in neither case did they see a ton of secondary fires like it wasn't blacking out the sky right there was black rain but apparently you know like a week later most of that stuff had cleared up but again that is you can't even really compare the two no it's a single 21 kiloton bomb yeah exactly we're talking a 50 of those going off in the same area uh but that report that you mentioned on just like if india and pakistan um well how much was it 10 megatons 50 50 or no it So it was one
megaton, so 50 of the Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombs.
Well, it was enough to cause the Atomic Scientists Science and Security Board to move the doomsday clock two minutes closer to midnight.
Yeah. And the doomsday clock is, some people say it's good science.
Some people say they're fear -mongering.
But what it is, it's a design that basically says, says, here's how close we are to destroying ourselves as a civilization.
And there are a lot of factors that go into it, like biotechnology or cyber technology, but the main two are obviously nuclear weapons and climate change are the two main things that factor into where the doomsday clock sits.
and I think in the 1950s they've only changed it how many times 18 times since it was created in 1947 have they changed the hands on the clock in the 1950s it was at 2 minutes till midnight and the early 1950s the best I think it's been in the early 90s was 17 minutes till midnight oh Oh, nice.
Yeah, doesn't that feel good?
Yeah. That's a lot of time.
Where are we at right now?
Right now we are the closest we've been since 1983, and on January 22nd of this year it was changed to three minutes until midnight is where they sit.
And they had a big press release.
I'll just read the opening and closing paragraphs.
The opening paragraph, In 2015, unchecked climate change global nuclear weapon modernizations and outsized nuclear weapons arsenals pose extraordinary and undeniable threats to the continued existence of humanity and world leaders have failed to act with the speed or on the scale required to protect citizens from potential catastrophe These failures of political leadership endanger every person on earth and then the final paragraph and there's lots of fun stuff in between Yeah just like fart jokes and stuff and then they close with In 2015, with the clock hand moved forward to three minutes to
midnight, the board feels compelled to add, with a sense of great urgency, the probability of global catastrophe is very high and the actions needed to reduce the risk of disaster must be taken very soon.
They don't mess around.
And even though we've been doing a good job of reducing the amount of warheads between the United States and Russia, but things have slowed to a snail's pace now.
From 2009 to 2013, Obama cut only 309 warheads from the stockpile.
And they're basically saying, we're not doing this as fast as we need to.
Like we need to act now.
Yeah. Well, there's other people who are saying we need to rebuild our nuclear arsenal because it's aging and rotting and will be useless by 2020 to 2030.
How are we going to drop nuclear bombs on people in the future?
Right. It's weird. Like some people are trying to reignite the Cold War.
Well, trust me, I don't agree with it, but I know that most of those people aren't saying, hey, so we can bomb people, it's so we can keep each other in check.
Yes. Which was the Cold War.
We could also just get rid of nuclear bombs entirely.
We could do that. And, you know, Sagan's whole thing, I should say, and it's funny that he's kind of like the villain of this whole thing, of the whole nuclear winter debate, because he's such a revered figure.
Sure. Such a great guy.
But he really, I purposefully made some serious missteps as far as publicizing the results went before they were fully in.
But his whole thing was, and if you read his foreign policy thing, his article, it's really, really good.
It's not too obtuse.
So, like, it's kind of fun to read.
But it's called Nuclear War and Climactic Catastrophe, colon, Some Policy Implications.
And he says, like, we don't know, you know, what the right answer is.
We don't know if it's entirely possible that nuclear winter, maybe our ideas are overblown or whatever.
But he says, I'm not willing to take the chance.
Right. Why should we take the chance?
That's my thing. It's like, why risk it?
Right. So his solution is, how about this, U .S. and USSR?
How about you de -escalate the arms race?
deproliferate until you get down to a threshold that science has said, okay, nuclear winter probably couldn't happen beyond this payload, right?
So even if all the nuclear bombs in the world, at this lower number, were set off, we still wouldn't go into nuclear winter.
But you guys can take out all of your major city centers and still fight your nuclear war, but the rest of the world won't be be destroyed by it yeah that was his solution and uh no one took him up on it i've never understood i don't know man we'll do one on climate change at some point too but i've never understood why people and i get that economics play a factor but why risking the future of mankind for your ancestors to follow is worth it a lot of it is fear like a lot of these people who have over the last decades you know pushed for that kind of thing like fear that you know the US will be
caught with his pants down like genuinely feared the Soviet Union and like their heart was in it like that but I mean if it's fascinating to me this whole like basically secret publicity war that's been going on that what went on throughout the 20th and it's well into the 21st century yeah there's a book again I think I mentioned it called It's called Merchants of Doubt.
Oh, yeah. Everybody should read.
It's so good. And you know what?
Save your emails to me because you can still think what you want to think.
Yeah. I just personally don't get it.
I'm not going to throw stones at you and say you're wrong.
I probably should. But I won't because it's not nice to throw stones.
It isn't, Chuck. Are you good?
I'm great. If you want to know more about Nuclear Winter, you can read this fine article written by Robert Lamb by typing Nuclear Winter in the search bar at HowStuffWorks .com.
Since I said search bar, it's time for listener mail.
Oh, no, my friend. It's time for administrative details.
All right. This is the time that we all know and love when Josh and I read out and say thanks.
We give thanks. We should call this Thanksgiving and not administrative details.
Oh, okay. Ready? No, no. Because administrative details Is such a weird name This is longer than it's meant to be So this is when we thank people For the very kind gifts That they have sent us over the months And dude I think this goes back All the way to January for me Oh man I've got one for Christmas cookies To Mona Collentine and Grandma Collentine I think we always say her name wrong No I think she corrected us And said it was like Valentine So I think I'm saying it right Man Mona's going to be so mad at me on me colin tina uh all right is the administrative detail music playing it sounds
like it great can't you hear that i'll get it started with uh richard sent us a guide to the round things of the solar system very fun very nice i remember that yes uh blair sent us a plug -in key holder you come home plug your key chain in and you never forget it it's pretty awesome actually you can get them on amazon electric socket unplugged chain holder search for that it It will bring it up.
That's right. I got a postcard, a very nice postcard, from Jean -Pierre Bonasco and Stephanie Crick from Port La Croix, Antarctica.
Nice. And it's worth saying again, thank you to Mona Kollentine and Grandma Kollentine for our Christmas cookies.
We look forward to them again this year.
Yes, we certainly do.
Oh, we've got nougat, homemade nougat from Kristen Ferguson again.
It's so delicious. I am hooked on that stuff.
It's great. You can find her at Solace Sweets.
Man, it is so good.
Yeah, Kristen's been sending us this homemade nougat for years.
And I was always like, homemade nougat?
I don't know about that.
And then I put it in my mouth.
It's amazing stuff.
It's really good. I know.
And then we also got some sweets from Dude Sweet Chocolate out of Texas.
I think they might be out of Dallas.
They sent us really great chocolates.
But they also make these incredible marshmallows, too.
They made a sweet potato marshmallow.
Wow. And dudes at Dude Sweet Chocolate, thank you for those.
They were amazing. Yumi was crazy for those marshmallows, like I am for the nougat.
That was quite the bounty.
I remember that. As always, every Christmas, our buddy Aaron Cooper in Kansas sends us great printouts of these great Photoshops that he does of us that he puts online.
Yeah, you can see them on Internet Roundup.
Yeah, we even got T -shirts this year of Shea Guevara, Josh, and Chuck.
So, Coop, you're the best. You know that.
That is true, Coop.
Mark, Alan, and the Trade Monkey team Sent us some beautiful jewelry Made by female artisans in Southeast Asia And traded fairly That's the key Our buddy Van Nostrand sent us a book Which book?
Well, he's always sending us stuff I honestly can't even remember which book But we have boxes full of things that he sent He sent us a CD of the Shag's Philosophy of the World What's known as the worst album Ever recorded I've got it at my desk That's his sense of humor.
The problem is my computer doesn't have a CD drive any longer.
Have you noticed that it's gone?
No. Yeah, computers don't have those any longer.
Try to find it on my computer.
I defy you. I was like, what's that little slot?
And you're like, that's where the tissues come out.
It's the coffee cup holder.
Our buddies from Venice's Sinking Band sent us an LP, Sand and Lines, and a CD, What We Do is Secret.
And they're our friends from Athens.
Yep. Huge, huge thanks to Hillary Lozar, who has sent us a lot of cheese over the last year.
Yeah. Some of the best cheese, Flathead Lake cheese.
Yeah, Montana. Which, like, they make a hoppy gouda that's to die for.
It is very gouda. Flathead Lake cheese.
And she sent us some awesome t -shirts that say Mouthfeel on them.
Yeah, Lozar's… Based on our bar episode.
She's the best. She and her husband, Mike, have been big -time fans.
They're very active on our Facebook page and they like drove to Seattle for our show from Monday from Montana Yeah, she's a teacher.
Yep, and they sent you me and Emily earrings.
So thanks for that from all of us That's right.
Jerry got nothing Tommy look Rick Tommy look Rich Luke Rick let rich He said it's a nice letter man.
Whose last name you say four times.
Well, he's the guy He's walking from Seattle to New York City.
And if you want to follow this, I don't know.
He might be there by now Now, tommywalks .tumblr .com.
You can check that out.
Okay. Huge, huge thanks from me personally to Laura Snow.
I don't know if you remember when we did the Hot Wheels episode.
Boy, do I. I said that the Hot Wheels I would love to have was this station wagon camper that said Good Time Camper on it.
Oh, I remember. She mailed it to me.
That's pretty remarkable.
Yep. So thank you very much, Laura Snow.
That was very nice of you.
Yeah. If anyone's listening, my favorite Hot Wheel was the one.
had $1 ,000 stuffed in the body of the car.
That's a good one. Stephan Brom, he sent us some currency banknotes.
Yeah. Which I've never collected money, but he sent a 1953 dollar certificate, a 1957 series $2 bill, and an 1874 fractional currency 10 -cent note.
Yeah, that was pretty neat.
I think you got the 10 -cent note, didn't you?
Because we split it up.
I spent it on candy.
No. They're like, what's this?
It's 10 cents, sir.
It's a fraction of a note.
Meteorologist Michael Erb, who also moonlights as a young adult murder mystery author, sent us a book of one of his murder mysteries, Kevin MacLeod and the Seaside Storm.
It's about a little weather detective.
It's pretty cute. Jeff Payton sent us a book, Darwin's Black Box.
Whoa. And Bethany at the Base Element, element the dot base dot element at gmail .com if you want any of the fleur de sel caramel she sent us we can highly recommend them and i got one more from both of us chuck all right dan kent name ring a bell uh it does he sent us the pints of pliny the elder oh yes thank you dan that's why it rings a bell you're a top -notch human being i think we met him in san francisco at our show I believe so the famous world renowned Pliny the Elder beer which I finally tried and it was delicious it is delish thank you very much everybody we have more if you didn't hear
your name hang tight we've got probably a couple more episodes worth of administrative details or Thanksgiving is what we're calling it now in the meantime you can get in touch with us send us an email to stuffpodcast .howstuffworks .com And as always, join us at our home on the web, stuffyoushouldknow .com.
Stuff You Should Know is a production of iHeartRadio.
For more podcasts from iHeartRadio, visit the iHeartRadio app.
Apple Podcasts are wherever you listen to your favorite shows.
Do you know the symptoms of moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea or OSA in adults with obesity?
They may be happening to you without your knowing.
If anyone's ever said you snore loudly or if you spend your days fighting off excessive tiredness, irritability, and concentration issues, it may be due to OSA.
OSA is a serious condition where your airway partially or completely collapses during sleep, which may cause breathing interruptions and oxygen deprivation.
Learn more at Don'tSleepOnOSA .com.
This information is provided by Lilly USA, LLC.
Banking with Capital One helps you keep more money in your wallet.
with no fees or minimums on checking accounts and no overdraft fees.
Just ask the Capital One Bank guy.
It's pretty much all he talks about, in a good way.
He'd also tell you that this podcast is his favorite podcast too.
Thanks, Capital One Bank guy.
What's in your wallet?
Terms apply. See CapitalOne .com slash bank.
Capital One N .A. Member FDIC.
of me? Have psychologists actually cracked the science of happiness?
Well, if any of those questions grabbed your attention, then you have to check out Big Brains, a podcast that doesn't just explain the latest science.
It introduces you to the people behind it, too.
That's right. This isn't pop science dressed up with clickbait.
It's The Real Deal produced by the University of Chicago, a global leader in academic research with experts, not influencers.
This is real science from real scientists made accessible to everyone.
Yeah. So if you're craving depth, depth, clarity, and ideas that linger long after the episode ends, then tune into Big Brains.
Listen and subscribe wherever you get your podcasts.
And you can learn more at bigbrainspodcast .com.
This is an iHeart Podcast.
