I'm Jessica Acevedo, executive producer of the hit Netflix documentary series, Dancing for the Devil, The 7M TikTok Cult.
And I'm Clea Gray, former member of 7M Films and Shekinah Church.
And we're the host of the new podcast, Forgive Me For I Have Followed.
Together, we'll be diving even deeper into the unbelievable stories behind 7M Films and Shekinah Church.
Listen to Forgive Me For I Have Followed on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
Hey, I'm Gianna Prudente.
And I'm Jamey Jackson -Gadson.
We're the hosts of Let's Talk Offline from LinkedIn News and iHeart Podcasts.
There's a lot to figure out when you're just starting your career.
That's where we come in.
Think of us as your work besties you can turn to for advice.
And if we don't know the answer, we bring in people who do.
Like negotiation expert, Maurie Teheri -Por.
If you start thinking about negotiations as just a conversation, then I think it sort of eases us a little bit.
Listen to Let's Talk Offline on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
Hey, everyone. It's me, Josh, and for this week's select, I've chosen our January 2016 episode on Futurology.
It's one of those topics that has a name that makes it sound way cooler and far out than it actually is.
But, happily, we found that when you dig into it, even the blandest parts of Futurology are super interesting still.
Hope you like this one, guys.
Welcome to Stuff You Should Know, a production of iHeartRadio.
Hey, and welcome to the podcast.
I'm Josh Clark. There's Charles W.
Chuck Bryant, and Jerry's here, and it's Stuff You Should Know from the future, but not really.
How are you doing? I'm fine.
Well, good. That's good.
I enjoyed this topic.
I thought it was kind of neat.
Yeah, it was funny.
Like, when you're reading about Futurology and Futurologists, aka futurists, you tend to want to make it more than it actually is.
And when you look into the topic, it keeps having to be beaten down just because of the name alone.
Yeah, you sound a little bit like a wackadoo.
A wackadoo? Did you say you're a futurist?
A seer? Sometimes they're thinking about using these really neat techniques to predict the future.
They're talking about some really mundane stuff, boring stuff, economic forecasts, things like that, how much oil will be left in 30 years, that kind of thing.
But then on the other hand, if you're a futurologist, you may also be tasked with figuring out what technology we're going to be using in 30 years.
What color the shiny jumpsuits we're all going to wear will be, that kind of stuff.
Yeah, I think one of my favorite things is to look at past future predictions.
Yeah, it's fun. Yeah, there's nothing that'll make someone look less knowledgeable than going back to what they thought the future would look like in the year 2000, like back in the 1930s or 40s, or sometimes some of those things happen.
Yeah, and then it's amazing.
Yeah, then it's like, wow.
Because sometimes these guys are really, really dead on.
And I was reading an article, I think it was in Harvard Business Review, and it was a post by Paul Safo, who runs a venture capital firm, I believe, called Disern.
And Paul Safo was saying, he was trying to get across that sci -fi authors and futurologists.
Their paths overlap quite a bit, but really, there's pretty big distinctions.
And even in this article, they got lumped in together, because sci -fi writers do definitely use futurology techniques.
But Paul Safo was saying, yeah, but a real futurologist, you have to use logic.
Right. If you're a sci -fi writer, you just use your imagination.
You don't have to back it up with anything.
If you're a futurologist, you have to use logic that makes sense to whoever's hearing your prediction.
Yeah, and I think that's one reason why some sci -fi writers have been right on the nose with some future predictions, because they're not hampered by logic, and they can just freeform.
But then it's just a lucky guess.
No, I don't think so.
I think they're still applying a lot of the same rules of futurology, but they're just not bound by the laws of logic.
Yeah, exactly. I'm with you.
But that's the best science fiction, though, I think, is something that logically makes sense.
Yeah. Because then it's just fantasy.
Yeah, that's true. So futurology is recognizing and assessing potential future events.
I could have sworn Jonathan Strickland wrote this, by the way, it read, but it was not.
No. It's very Strickland -esque.
Nicholas Gerbus. Yeah, that's Strickland's alter ego.
I wonder if it is. I've never met this Nicholas Gerbus.
But the point Gerbus makes, which I think is good, is it's a product of our times in many cases, depending on where we are as a society, and he makes a great point.
During the Civil War, there probably weren't a lot of rosy predictions for the future, American Civil War.
Sure. But in the Gilded Age, people are a lot more optimistic, so it's a whole different deal.
During the Cold War, for instance, a lot of paranoia, a lot of cynicism, probably not going to be a rosy outlook for the future, like during the Gilded Age.
When it was rosier.
Yeah, way more optimistic than the Cold War.
Which is kind of ironic, because the Gilded Age didn't have anything to be optimistic about.
They were just pretending, hence the name.
The thing is, what you've just said, though, is kind of an argument against futurology, because one of the big critiques of it is that a futurologist, they're not doing anything.
Even if you're commenting on the past or the future, you're still really commenting about your present, your contemporary time, because that's what you...
Or recent past. Sure, yeah.
That's what you've lived through and experienced.
That's all you can really reflect on, and futurology seeks to go beyond that.
Well, yeah, that makes sense, though.
If you look at this thing that is happening now, or just happened, then what is going to be happening in that thing in 10 years?
And it's a lot of times based on how the direction it's currently going.
Yes, okay. So, Gerbus makes a pretty good...
Gives a good example that the cell phone grew out of the telegraph, which ultimately is related further back to the smoke signal.
Sure. Right? Yeah. But if you were a futurologist hanging out around somebody who was sending smoke signals, would you be able to predict the cell phone?
Probably not. Probably not.
Could you predict the impact of the automobile or the highway system?
Right. Maybe. But would you predict that people would have sex in the backseat of a car?
Because it provides a little...
Well, I don't think they did.
Urban sprawl. Yeah, could you predict exurbs and edge cities just because the highways got built?
Yeah, and not a lot of people did, even though a lot of people said, there's going to be horseless carriages one day, and they're going to change things big time.
People are going to be able to move around a lot more.
But that doesn't mean that everybody saw every result of the automobile.
It was a game changer, is what you could call it.
Agreed. So, what we're saying here, and if it sounds a little weird that we're at once supporting and criticizing futurology, that's basically the fun thing to do.
When you talk about futurology, is to criticize it and be awed by it, because a lot of times they really are super right.
That's right. Futurology has been around for a long time.
I mean, since people were writing fiction, there were people predicting the future.
But as far as... Things didn't really get going as far as it being meaningful until after World War II, when the US started developing technological forecasting.
Basically, it was really important to try and see where things were going militarily.
Right, because it was super expensive to develop new technologies.
It could take a long time.
They started thinking, hey, we need to get some people on board that can hopefully predict where we're headed here so we can make the right decisions.
Yeah, because if it takes a really long time, like you said, to develop a weapon, by the time you have that weapon deployed in the field, you're going to need to know it's not already obsolete.
The only way to do that is to predict what kind of warfare you're going to be engaged in.
Because this is a time, like at the end of World War II, so many inventions came out of World War I and II, war machine inventions, that things were changing so quickly that there was actually...
You can kind of put modern futurology into the lap of one guy, an Air Force general named Hap Arnold, who saw that things were changing so fast that his Air Force needed to basically predict the future and see what direction it needed to go.
So he looked around and he started tapping people to do that.
One of the first people he tapped was a scientist, an aeronautical engineer named Theodore von Karman.
Yes, he was a super smart dude, and he led a team that did predict a lot of stuff, like drones.
And as far as the military using drones, not your uncle who flies it around the neighborhood, just to film stuff.
He predicted the rise of Brookstone.
Target -seeking missiles, supersonic aircraft, and even the atom bomb.
All of this was in one report to Hap Arnold.
And this guy knocked it out of the park, but he and his group were very much limited to small academic and military circles, like the general public wasn't aware that this was going on.
But his group, von Karman's group, so accurately foresaw the direction that modern warfare was going, that you can also very easily make the case that, no, he basically created a roadmap to the future that the Air Force followed.
So his prophecies were self -fulfilling because he said, go this way, and the Air Force went that way and created all this stuff.
Yeah, and then the military and, well, the brand corporation specifically, it grew out of the US Air Force and Douglas aircraft in the mid -40s.
They said, well, having one person to say these things is great, but what we need is a team and a consensus among this team.
So they kind of, well, not kind of, they very much patented a technique they called the Delphi technique, D -E -L -P -H -I.
And that is basically a technique where they're trying to get agreed -on consensus from a number of people.
So there's this very famous story about how the Navy, I think, lost a submarine, a nuclear submarine, or the Russians had lost a submarine, something like that.
There was a lost sub that they wanted to find, and they had no idea where it was.
So the Navy polled all these different experts and all these different fields that might have something to do with nuclear submarines, weather, aeronautics, people from NOAA, all these people, right?
And asked them, where do you think the sub is?
And no one hit it on the nose.
But when they basically used statistical distribution of these various opinions, guesses of professionals, it led them right to that sub.
And that's what the Delphi technique does, too.
It takes opinions of experts in various fields and says, what do you think of this?
And everybody sends in a questionnaire anonymously, and there's no group meeting.
So the group doesn't bow to pressure.
No leaders emerge. They're giving their unvarnished opinion.
And then after those opinions come in, they take that information and send it out again.
So it goes in rounds and rounds and rounds until they finally come to a group consensus that in the future, we're all going to be wearing metallic blue jumpsuits.
And what they're doing is generating what's known as a scenario.
And a guy named Herman Kahn, K -A -H -N, worked with Rand in the 1950s.
And he's the one that kind of coined the term scenario as it applies to futurology.
Right. A pretty good definition I found was, a scenario is a detailed portrait of a plausible future world, one sufficiently vivid that a planner can clearly see and comprehend the problems, challenges, and opportunities that such an environment would present.
So it's saying, in the future, we're going to have a scenario where there are going to be robots in every house.
Yeah. And one of the biggest ways that they work on scenarios is with something called backcasting, which is starting at the end, which is you've got a robot in every house.
Right. And then go backwards.
To how you got there?
Yeah, to how you got there.
Brilliant. Yeah, makes sense.
Yeah. And scenarios, that's a pretty cool scenario.
They can also be as mundane as running a fire drill where you're envisioning the fire broke out in the high school gym.
Right. And so everybody needs to get out.
That's a scenario. It's as simple as that.
Yeah. The weather forecasts or economic forecasts that are run through computer algorithms.
The computer algorithms, the model, the process that it's going through is the scenario.
And it spits out a possible prediction.
It's almost like effect, then cause.
Right. Yeah, you know.
Yeah, excellently put.
Thank you. So Herman Kahn worked with Rand and - And did you look him up at all?
Oh, yeah. He's one of the inspirations for Dr.
Strangelove. Yeah. He was described as a super genius.
Yeah, he was super smart.
And he kind of was a bit of a celebrity at the time.
He wrote a book in 1961 called On Thermonuclear War.
And then went on to form, left Rand to form the Hudson Institute, where he basically was like, we're a group that is going to forecast the future.
He became, it was like a super popular book.
And he spawned a lot of other books, similar books.
We need to take a break, but we'll get right back to this in a second.
I'm Jessica Acevedo, executive producer of the hit Netflix documentary series, Dancing for the Devil, The 7M TikTok Cult.
And I'm Clea Gray, former member of 7M Films and Shekinah Church.
And we're the host of the new podcast, Forgive Me For I Have Followed.
Together, we'll be diving even deeper into the unbelievable stories behind 7M Films and LA -based Shekinah Church, an alleged cult that has impacted members for over two decades.
Jessica and I will delve into the hidden truths between high -control groups and interview dancers, church members, and others whose lives and careers have been impacted, just like mine.
Through powerful, in -depth interviews with former members and new, chilling first -hand accounts, the series will illuminate untold and extremely necessary perspectives.
Forgive Me For I Have Followed will be more than an exploration.
It's a vital revelation aimed at ensuring these types of abuses never happen again.
Listen to Forgive Me For I Have Followed on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
For decades, the mafia had New York City in a stranglehold, with law enforcement seemingly powerless to intervene.
It uses terror to extort people.
But the murder of Carmi Galante marked the beginning of the end, sparking a chain of events that would ultimately dismantle the most powerful crime organization in American history.
It sent the message to them that we can prosecute these people.
Discover how a group of young prosecutors took on the mafia, and with the help of law enforcement, brought down its most powerful figures.
These bosses on the commission had no idea what was coming their way from the federal government.
From Wolf Entertainment and iHeart Podcasts, this is Law & Order Criminal Justice System.
Listen to Law & Order Criminal Justice System on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
You have a lot of questions.
Like, how do I speak up when I'm feeling overwhelmed?
Or, can I negotiate a higher salary if this is my first real job?
Girl, yes! Each week, we answer your unfiltered work questions.
Think of us as your work besties you can turn to for advice.
And if we don't know the answer, we bring in experts who do.
Like resume specialist Morgan Sanner.
The only difference between the person who doesn't get the job and the person who gets the job is usually who applies.
Yeah, I think a lot about that quote, what is it?
Like you miss 100 % of the shots you never take.
Yeah, rejection is scary, but it's better than you rejecting yourself.
Together, we'll share what it really takes to thrive in the early years of your career.
Without sacrificing your sanity or sleep.
Listen to Let's Talk Offline on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
New from Embedded. Who gets to compete as a woman?
This question came up in ugly form at the Paris Olympics.
But it's not new. If she runs like a man and talks like a man, is she a man?
Hear about the long history of sex testing women athletes on Tested, a new series from CBC and NPR's Embedded podcast.
Listen to all episodes on the iHeartRadio app or wherever you get your podcasts.
So, Chuck, you were just talking about Herman Kahn being the super genius who is something of a celebrity.
I read that Timothy Leary animated that he had taken acid with him.
I believe it. He was a part of the inspiration for Dr.
Strangelove. And this book that he wrote called The Year 2000, a framework for speculation on the next 33 years.
It basically established this outlook that America and capitalism could do anything thanks to basically technological inventiveness.
Let's hear some of these.
There was a list in that book.
100 technical innovations very likely in the last third of the 20th century.
100. Some of the first 10 multiple applications of lasers.
Boom. High strength structural materials.
Nailed it. Wouldn't you think?
Alloys. New or improved materials for equipment and appliances.
No, that's that's easy.
Anyone can say that.
Sure. I'd be better material in the future right now for 2050.
Longer range, longer range weather forecasting.
More reliable weather forecasting.
I don't know about that one.
I think that was a miss.
How about this? Here are a few of the other ones.
New techniques for cheap and reliable birth control, for sure.
Yeah, the pill. I don't know if the pill was around.
We should do a whole thing.
It may have been the same year because it came out in 67.
Was it? Yeah. Well, this book came out in 67.
Right. Widespread use of nuclear reactors for power.
Duh. Improved capability to change sex of a children or adult.
Gender reassignment.
Pervasive business use of computers.
Yeah, they're all over.
Personal pagers. Yeah, that came and went.
And then one of the other ones was home computers to run households and communicate with the outside world.
Yeah, the internet of things.
Yeah. They also predicted the rise of the credit economy.
Oh, really? Yeah. That we currently are in.
Interesting. Yeah, so and that was just like a list.
Like a sidebar, basically.
Yeah, in this book.
In this book. But the whole idea that America and capitalism in the West could invent its way out of any problem we possibly ran across in the future was the premise or the position of this book.
And it caused an enormous furor in academic circles.
And not just academic circles because this book was one of the first to introduce the public that there were such things as think tanks like Rand.
Yeah. Club of Rome.
Yeah, and that these people were sitting there thinking about the future and were writing books about it.
And it kind of became a hip thing.
But the Club of Rome was basically diametrically opposed to the outlook that Herman Kahn had.
And the Club of Rome was a business consortium that conspiracy theorists say is basically the seat of the New World Order.
They're still around.
They are. And the Club of Rome basically said, no, we are establishing the gloom and doom camp that there is such thing as resource depletion over population.
And we are basically doomed.
Yeah, I mean, we've covered this a lot on the show.
Different people that have made wild predictions about, we're going to run out of this by this year.
Thomas Malthus. Yeah, very Malthusian.
One of the books that came out of the Club of Rome in 1972 was called Limits to Growth by Danella H.
Meadows, Dennis Meadows, Jurgen Randers, and William Behrens at MIT.
And they had a very dire apocalyptic outlook of the future, as did a lot of other people at the time.
And a lot of these were way off base.
A lot of these dire predictions.
Right. You know, it's happened over and over again.
Yeah, and so on the Club of Rome's website, they defend the limits to growth.
Or no, not the limits to growth.
Yeah, the Limits to Growth book.
Basically saying that it's often miscited as predicting the collapse of civilization due to renewable resource overuse.
And it doesn't do that.
But they did use these same kind of techniques that Herman Kahn and some of his other colleagues were coming up with by taking population information, food production data, industrial production, pollution, and non -renewable resource consumption.
And then running scenarios through this model that they built using computers.
And coming up with the scenarios they came up with were kind of grim.
The thing is, is even though they missed the mark, they still helped establish a very young idea that we can't just throw your McDonald's styrofoam on the ground.
You can't drive a car that gets two miles per gallon.
We can't live like everything is just forever abundant, that there's no such thing as scarcity.
Yeah, it's a double -edged sword though.
I totally agree, but then it also, when you're wrong about these things, it gives cynics something to point to to say, well, see, we didn't run out of oil in the early 1980s, like you said we would.
And we definitely do.
So why do anything about it?
Yeah, I mean, man, that is a great point.
It's a very great point.
But at the same time, what you're seeing here between the limits to growth and the year 2000, we still see this today with climate change.
It's like, let's do something about climate change.
The other people say, no, we can invent our way out of it.
And besides, if we do something about climate change, it's going to mess with the economy.
And these people are saying, forget about the economy.
We are all going to die.
Yeah, or not necessarily forget about the economy, but maybe you can do both.
You know, my whole deal with that has always been just like, why take that risk?
Well, we humans aren't very good at preparing for future risk, which is, I think, one of the reasons why futurologists are so revered and awed, but also mocked and scorned, because they're doing something that almost flies in the face of human nature.
Yeah, you're really putting yourself out there when you predict some of this stuff.
Oh, there was one other episode that just reminded me of the 10 ,000 year clock.
Oh, yeah, yeah, yeah.
That was a great one.
So the military, the United States military, obviously has used it for years.
Then beginning, when was this, in the 60s or 70s, that business got into it?
So in 1972, I think Royal Dutch Shell heard somebody at the top heard that there wasn't going to be any oil by 1985.
And they went, what?
Yeah, businesses basically said, wait a minute, there are people that can actually use models to determine what the future might look like.
How can we use that to make money?
Well, let's throw money at them and find out.
Exactly. A couple of other places, too, that were nascent think tanks, like Rand was the Stanford Research Institute Futures Group in the California Institute of Technology.
Yeah. Early kind of think tank breeding grounds.
Just smart people walking around, thinking about the future.
But that wasn't enough.
You can't just say, this is what I think it's going to be like.
You have to back it up.
And we'll talk about how they back it up right after this.
I'm Jessica Acevedo, executive producer of the hit Netflix documentary series, Dancing for the Devil, The 7M TikTok Cult.
And I'm Clea Gray, former member of 7M Films and Shekinah Church.
And we're the host of the new podcast, Forgive Me For I Have Followed.
Together, we'll be diving even deeper into the unbelievable stories behind 7M Films and LA -based Shekinah Church, an alleged cult that has impacted members for over two decades.
Jessica and I will delve into the hidden truths between high control groups and interviewed dancers, church members, and others whose lives and careers have been impacted, just like mine.
Through powerful, in -depth interviews with former members and new, chilling firsthand accounts, the series will illuminate untold and extremely necessary perspectives.
Forgive Me For I Have Followed will be more than an exploration.
It's a vital revelation aimed at ensuring these types of abuses never happen again.
Listen to Forgive Me For I Have Followed on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
For decades, the mafia had New York City in a stranglehold, with law enforcement seemingly powerless to intervene.
It uses terror to extort people.
But the murder of Carmi Galante marked the beginning of the end, sparking a chain of events that would ultimately dismantle the most powerful crime organization in American history.
It sent the message to them that we can prosecute these people.
Discover how a group of young prosecutors took on the mafia, and with the help of law enforcement, brought down its most powerful figures.
These bosses on the commission had no idea what was coming their way from the federal government.
From Wolf Entertainment and iHeart Podcasts, this is Law & Order Criminal Justice System.
Listen to Law & Order Criminal Justice System on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
Hey, I'm Gianna Perrente.
And I'm Jame Jackson Gadsden.
We're the hosts of Let's Talk Offline, a new podcast from LinkedIn News and iHeart Podcasts.
When you're just starting out in your career, you have a lot of questions.
Like, how do I speak up when I'm feeling overwhelmed?
Or, can I negotiate a higher salary if this is my first real job?
Girl, yes! Each week, we answer your unfiltered work questions.
Think of us as your work besties you can turn to for advice.
And if we don't know the answer, we bring in experts who do, like resume specialist Morgan Sanner.
The only difference between the person who doesn't get the job and the person who gets the job is usually who applies.
Yeah, I think a lot about that quote.
What is it, like you miss 100 % of the shots you never take?
Yeah, rejection is scary, but it's better than you rejecting yourself.
Together, we'll share what it really takes to thrive in the early years of your career.
Without sacrificing your sanity or sleep.
Listen to Let's Talk Offline on the iHeart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
New from Embedded. Who gets to compete as a woman?
This question came up in ugly form at the Paris Olympics.
But it's not new. If she runs like a man and talks like a man, is she a man?
Hear about the long history of sex testing women athletes on Tested, a new series from CBC and NPR's Embedded podcast.
Listen to all episodes on the iHeart Radio app or wherever you get your podcasts.
How do they back it up?
Well, they use different techniques.
If you're a futurist or a futurologist, you're going to be using techniques that are pretty recognizable.
But the way you put them together and the things you sort out is what's going to make you successful or not successful, right?
So you like brainstorm ideas?
Yeah, that's probably where you start.
Yeah. It's just like blue sky territory, as they say.
Yeah, you imagine things using scenarios or games.
Apparently game theory.
But we got to do that at some point.
Yeah, I've been avoiding it.
Me too. So like we could mess it up really bad, but we'll do it.
That changed the futurism field tremendously when they came up with game theory, because it's a pretty good way of predicting how people will work.
And that's one of the big confounding factors is you can predict something, follow every single one of these steps that we're talking about right now, and then people will just cut to the left all of a sudden.
And your prediction just fell to the wayside because humanity went this way real quick.
Yeah, or somebody invented a game changer, a game -changing product or innovation that nobody saw coming.
Yeah, what's that called?
Disruptive technology.
Is it? That's a good, I like that.
Not a bad band name.
Oh, I wonder if it's out there.
If so, it's made of like Silicon Valley rich guys.
Yeah, this is like my side band.
Do you want to gather professional opinions using, say, the Delphi technique?
Yeah. You want to do historical analysis?
Sure. Current trends are very huge and can help you as well.
And then like you were saying, I think you call it back masking?
No, that's turn me on dead man.
Right, from the Beatles.
Yeah, that's what they do.
They listen to the Beatles backwards.
What was it? It's not back masking, I know.
But where you envision a future and then you work your way backward from it.
When you do this, you do all this stuff together and again...
Back casting. Back casting.
And when you're using this along with computer algorithms that can model the economy or the weather or oil consumption or something like that, you can come up with something that you could rightly say is a prediction or a forecast for the future.
Where we're going to be.
That's right. Again, though, just things happen.
For example, Herman Kahn did not predict the oil crisis that came the year after he wrote another famous book in 1972.
He wrote a response, I think, to Limits to Growth and just totally missed the oil crisis.
But how could he predict that?
Because the oil crisis came out of the OPEC oil embargo that was punishment for the US's being involved in the Yom Kippur War.
So you couldn't see that coming?
No, and that's the big problem with futurology.
Yes, exactly. Our own US government has been wrong.
The US Department of Interior announced twice in 1939 and then in 1951 that we only had 13 years of oil left.
So weird that both times it was 13 years.
They don't like to bother people, so they wait until there's 13 years left and they sound...
Is that what it is?
Just such a specific number.
It is. What else? Well, we've talked about Moore's Law before.
That has aged a little better than some other futurology predictions because it has been revised over the years, which is sort of a cheat.
A little bit, but still.
What I really meant was this.
I think you went from 18 months to two years or something like that, but what's funny is Gerbus stakes his position in this article.
He's saying the Limits to Growth and the other Club of Rome stuff, they missed the mark.
Because they predicted catastrophe and Moore's Law predicts technological innovation, so it's successful.
Clearly, Gerbus agrees with the Herman Kahn group rather than the Club of Rome group.
I don't think it's settled.
I think you can't just say the gloom and doom camp has just been completely eradicated or proven wrong.
Agreed. Yeah, and Moore's Law, I don't even think we said specifically, predicts the number of transistors on integrated circuits and computers doubles every two years.
Like we said, it's been updated and it's been pretty consistent.
With Herman Kahn's popularity and then the big high -profile book publishing argument that he got in with the Club of Rome, that led to a spate of other futurology books that were popular.
I remember it being a big deal when I was a kid.
I remember a lot of people talking about the near and far future.
The one that I ran across in this article that I had heard of, but I didn't know anything about, Alvin Toffler's Future Shock.
I remember that, I think.
Did you read it? No.
The cover, I guarantee, would just give you nostalgia, I'm sure.
Oh, really? But it came out in 1970 and it predicts a future where too much rapid change, technological change and advancement, it happens too quickly and people get all sorts of stressed and just worn out and basically have all manner of terrible reactions to it.
And I'm like, whoa, that guy predicted 2015.
So like a person's emotions couldn't handle?
Yeah, we're just overwhelmed through too much rapid technological innovation.
Happens too quick. Do you think we're overwhelmed?
Like I get stressed out by like, say, social media or something like that.
I wonder if it's a certain people of a certain age.
Yeah, I would guess if you're born into it, you're used to it.
So it would probably more likely apply to a transition population like this.
The transitional generation, is that what we are?
Don't you get stressed by social media?
Don't you get like just tense and...
Yeah, I mean, I kind of just hate it.
Or having information, all this information and all of it's just so thin, content wise or value wise, but there's tons of it.
And it's always coming at you, that stuff wears me out.
It wears me out too.
I got the future shock, Chuck.
You got the Jimmy legs?
No, I totally agree.
I'm like that. I just want to shut it all down.
Just shh, everybody.
Not podcasts though.
That should live on.
So we talked about science fiction writers and how they are easily off the hook, because they're just writers, right?
They're not supposed to predict the future.
But they have been, you can't dismiss it because they've been on the money or close to it a lot over the years.
Because like we said, they're not hampered by the rational laws of today.
They can just say whatever they want.
And if they're wrong, it's like, hey, dude, I'm just writing stuff.
Yes. This is fiction.
But a few of the highlights, Jules Verne, mid 19th century, predicted going to the moon in a spacecraft.
Not only that, so he predicted it would be shot out of a cannon, basically.
Yeah, big gun. But the thing that he really got though, was that he placed the moon shot in Florida, like 137 miles from Cape Canaveral, where they do launch rockets to the moon.
Not bad. And for the same reason too, it's close to the equator.
Oh, is that why? That's one of the reasons why.
Plus Cape Canaveral is largely protected by the Gulf Stream from hurricanes.
Like as a hurricane comes ashore, right before it starts to get to Canaveral, it goes out again and then hits North Carolina.
Interesting. That'd be an interesting conversation to have been in on.
When they were picking places.
Where should we launch this?
I mean, where should we put all of our money into?
H .G. Wells, he predicted tanks.
Yeah, he was good at it.
Supposedly he was the first guy to really think of himself as a futurist.
He predicted the atom bomb in 1908, aerial bombing in 1908.
The name robot was actually coined by a science fiction writer, a Czech writer named Karl Kapek.
And in 1921, he named robots.
I think the all -time winner though is Hugo Gernsbach.
And Hugo Gernsbach, if you're into science fiction, you recognize his first name, because he's who the Hugo award is named after.
You may also recognize his last name too, if you're a Hugo Gernsbach fan.
But back in, I think the 1910s, he wrote a book called Ralph 124C 41 plus.
He predicted everything in this.
Yeah, you know what that means?
It's actually a play on words.
One, two, it means 124C for one another.
You get it? Wow, yeah, that's great.
124C for one, and then another is the plus sign.
Yeah, yeah. That alone, I was sold.
Yeah. I was like, I love this guy.
It's just like that Van Halen album, OU 812.
Exactly. So what does he predicted?
He predicted solar power, like the realistic use of solar power.
He predicted plastics, video phones, tape recorders, jukeboxes, loud speakers.
Tinfoil, rustproof steel, synthetic fabrics, all in one book.
And he's famous in the Hugo Awards named after him because he wanted to make science fiction more science -based, using that same logic.
So he would have been a very, like almost a father of futurology.
Oh yeah, for sure. Here's a few other things from that book.
This one to me, I'm surprised no one's done this yet.
The appetizer, which is at a restaurant, in a scientifically advanced restaurant, it'll be a room that you wait in before you get your table that's flooded with gases that make you hungry.
Oh yeah. Not bad. Yeah.
Just have a seat in the appetizer room.
Right. We'll be ready shortly.
There's like bloody fingernails that's scratched into the walls as people are trying to get to the other room where the food is.
The telautograph, which is basically a fax machine, the telefot, which was a picture phone, had a universal translator where they translate any language right there in your hand.
Yeah. Not bad. And then this one I love.
The Vacation City was a suspended city and a domed suspended city, 20 ,000 feet in the air, that used a device that nullified gravity.
And in Vacation City, no mechanical devices are permitted because it was supposed to be a true escape.
That's awesome. From the mechanized world.
Waiting for that one.
And this was in 1911.
Yeah. He predicted just that there would be a need for that.
That's like that town in West Virginia.
Green something, West Virginia, where the people who have electromagnetic sensitivity go because you're not allowed to have any electromagnetic stuff.
Oh, really? Because there's like a radio telescope or there's something there that could be interfered with.
And you could be Amish.
Can you just be Amish?
No. Like, hey, I want to be Amish.
If you're Harrison Ford, you could be.
Yeah, or Woody Harrelson.
Right? You got anything else?
How about these predictions for the future?
There's a couple in here that are kind of funny.
10 predictions that missed the mark.
And these are real predictions.
In 1967, US News and World Report said that by the end of the century, we will launch our freight across the continent with missiles.
Like, you order something from Amazon in New York.
Instead of having a fulfillment center nearby, they just put it in a missile and shoot it to you.
Didn't happen. No, but drones are coming.
Are they really? Are they still on that?
In 1955, a guy named Alex Lewitt predicted nuclear power vacuum cleaners.
This one, I think, would be pretty great.
Dissolving dishes. And asked what it would be like in the year 2000, a science writer named Waldemar Kampfert.
There's a lot of, man, one, two, three, four, five.
He's a fabulous science writer with the funny name.
Consonants in a row.
He said you would basically put your plate in 250 -degree water at the end, and it would just dissolve it.
No more dishwashing.
Bucky Fuller predicted that Canada would be a subtropical climate because we would build a dome over it.
That didn't happen.
No, it didn't. Which is strange because Bucky Fuller was a pretty sharp dude.
Here's another one.
Was he really? Yeah, Buckminster Fuller.
Oh, I didn't pick up on that.
He's who Bucky Balls are named after.
Why? He may have invented them, I'm not sure.
What's a Bucky Ball?
It's those little balls that are magnetic spheres that you can shape into Bucky Balls.
Yeah, yeah. Here's one, a Scottish geneticist that said in the 1920s that in the future, one -third of the babies would not be born.
Only one -third would be born as a result of pregnancy, and the other babies would be born in a lab.
Would they be grown, basically?
Exogenesis. Here's the last one, Chuck, you ready?
1975, the Research Institute of America, which sounds pretty smart, said that by 1975, I'm sorry, this is several years before that, we would all be driving personal helicopters.
Did not pan out. Probably never will.
I don't know if I'd want a personal helicopter.
You know, I was, for Emily's birthday, I rented a cabin in the North Georgia Mountains.
Did you take a personal helicopter there?
No, but I was sitting on the deck, we all were, and way across the valley on the side of a mountain was this huge, huge house.
And I heard a sound of a helicopter, and I was like, and I saw a blinking light.
I got up binoculars, and this dude had a helicopter.
And he took it, and he flew it down about two miles to the lake at the bottom of the valley.
And I guess he has a lake house and a mountain house, and the easiest way to get there is to make the four -minute helicopter flight.
That's crazy. Yeah, it was pretty amazing.
I want to know who that guy is.
And that guy could be a lady.
Yeah, it could be. What am I saying?
Could be Carly Fiorina.
Yeah. Who's that? She's the woman who's running for GOP president candidate?
Oh, right. That's right.
Gotcha. Go ahead. Oh, sorry.
Let's see. Well, if you want to know more about futurology, you can type that word into the search bar at howstoworks .com.
And since Chuck had an anecdote about helicopters, it's time for listener mail.
It sort of looked like one of those Magnum PI ones, too.
Well, if I did have a personal helicopter, it would look an awful lot like that.
I'm sure it would. Hey, guys.
My name is Shelby. I'm honored for you to be reading this.
My husband and I love your show.
And you've solved our dilemma as to what to listen to in our car together.
I want to let you know you did a great job on the HIV AIDS podcast.
However, I think you missed telling a really important story about the AIDS crisis.
Just before the AIDS crisis broke, a method for treating hemophilia called a clotting factor concentrate was developed.
Finally, let those suffering from the disease live into adulthood and completely change the landscape of the disorder.
By the time HIV was discovered to be a bloodborne virus, many of those suffering from hemophilia already had it, not to mention that many also contracted hepatitis.
However, the pharmaceutical companies did not begin to pasteurize the drug in spite of their knowledge that it was spreading HIV until a strong public outcry prompted a government intervention.
I think the story is not told often enough in the injustice that these individuals suffered at the hands of Big Pharma is undoubtedly one of the greatest our country has seen.
There's an extremely informative and sad documentary on the topic called Bad Blood Colon, a cautionary tale.
Anyway, that's about it.
And I'm sorry if I bummed everyone out.
That is from Shelby.
Shelby, thank you for not only that illuminating email, but also the documentary recommendation.
We're always looking for those.
If you want to get in touch with us, you can send us an email to howstuffworks .com.
And as always, turn us at our home on the web, stuffyoushouldknow .com.
Stuff You Should Know is a production of iHeartRadio.
For more podcasts from iHeartRadio, visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.
Hey, I'm Gianna Prudenty.
And I'm Jamee Jackson -Gadson.
We're the hosts of Let's Talk Offline from LinkedIn News and iHeart Podcasts.
There's a lot to figure out when you're just starting your career.
That's where we come in.
Think of us as your work besties you can turn to for advice.
And if we don't know the answer, we bring in people who do, like negotiation expert, Maurie Teheri -Por.
If you start thinking about negotiations as just a conversation, then I think it sort of eases us a little bit.
Listen to Let's Talk Offline on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
I'm Jessica Acevedo, executive producer of the hit Netflix documentary series, Dancing for the Devil, The 7M TikTok Cult.
And I'm Clea Gray, former member of 7M Films and Shekinah Church.
And we're the host of the new podcast, Forgive Me for I Have Followed.
Together, we'll be diving even deeper into the unbelievable stories behind 7M Films and Shekinah Church.
Listen to Forgive Me for I Have Followed on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
I'm Carrie Champion, and this is season four of Naked Sports.
Up first, I explore the making of a rivalry.
Kaitlyn Clark versus Angel Reese.
Every great player needs a foil.
I know I'll go down in history.
People are talking about women's basketballs just because of one single game.
Clark and Reese have changed the way we consume women's sports.
Listen to the making of a rivalry, Kaitlyn Clark versus Angel Reese, on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
Presented by Capital One, founding partner of iHeart Women's Sports.
