Another body experience is the subjective feeling that someone has during a period of time, during a window, that they exist without being in their physical bodies.
So during that time they have the awareness that I exist, I'm still here, but I'm not in my physical body anymore.
When I say it's a subjective feeling, I like to emphasize that because as long as the person had the feeling that they existed without being in their physical bodies, you kind of don't need that proof or that evidence anymore.
People can experience different things while they have the experience of being out of their bodies, but to me what really matters is the feeling that they exist without being in the body.
So have you ever had one of those experiences that just rocks you to your core, but it seems like so different, so out of the ordinary, so extraordinary, and maybe hard to believe that you can't even describe it to yourself, let alone to others, the kind that makes you question everything you thought
you knew about reality itself.
I have had a few of those mind -bending moments in my life, little glimpses that seem to reveal deeper layers of truth lurking beneath the surface, experiences that leave you wondering is there more to this reality than meets the eye, more to our minds and our consciousness than we have been taught.
If you have grappled with those kind of questions, you're going to love today's guest because Marina Weiler has dedicated her career to rigorously studying extraordinary human experiences that challenge our conventional understanding of the mind -body relationship.
Her recent focus is, wait for this, out of body experiences where people report the sensation of existing outside of their physical form.
Utterly mystifying, but it turns out there is some powerful science at work here, and Marina is a fantastic guide for us.
She would know she is an assistant professor of psychiatry and neurobehavioral sciences at the University of Virginia where she studies phenomena that transcend our typical understanding of physicality.
To train neuroscientists with expertise in neuroimaging, brain stimulation, and basic neuroscience, she has earned prestigious awards and grants for her groundbreaking research exploring consciousness.
Her journey took an unexpected turn.
When she decided to pivot from more traditional neuroscience topics to the fascinating realm of out of body experiences and near -death phenomena, trying to figure out what is actually happening here.
In this mind -expanding conversation, Marina pulls back the curtain on her research into out of body experiences, what they are, what they aren't, how science explains them, how to access them, and what the powerful benefits just might be.
Imagine being able to exist outside of your physical form, perceiving the world from an entirely new vantage point.
It is an idea that shatters our conventional beliefs about the relationship between mind -body and brain.
So excited to share this conversation with you.
I'm Jonathan Fields and this is Good Life Project.
Live dot com, progressive casualty insurance company and affiliates, price and coverage match limited by state law, not available in all states.
Ryan Reynolds here for Mint Mobile.
You know, one of the perks about having four kids that you know about is actually getting a direct line to the big man up north.
And this year he wants you to know the best gift that you can give someone is the gift of Mint Mobile's unlimited wireless for $15 a month.
Now you don't even need to wrap it.
Give it a try at MintMobile .com slash Switch.
$45 upfront payment required equivalent to $15 per month.
New customers on first three month plan only.
Taxes and fees extra.
Speeds lower above 40 gigabytes on unlimited.
See MintMobile .com for details.
We all have dreams.
Dream home renovations.
Dream vacations. Or sending our kids to their dream colleges.
But finding straightforward ways to turn those dreams into realistic goals, that's where things get tricky.
Merrill understands that.
That's why with a dedicated Merrill advisor, you get a personalized plan and a clear path forward.
And having the bull at your back helps your whole financial life move with you.
So when your plans change, Merrill is with you every step of the way.
Go to ml .com slash bullish to learn more.
Merrill, a Bank of America company.
What would you like the power to do?
Investing involves risk.
Merrill Lynch, Pierce Fenner and Smith Incorporated, registered broker dealer, registered investment advisor, member SIPC.
I'm just deeply fascinated by the work that you're doing.
But before we even get to the work that you're doing right now, I'm also really fascinated by what seems to be a really interesting sort of shift in direction.
You know, neuroscientists working, doing some research, NIH, NIA, UCLA.
Really what seemed to be a focus on Alzheimer and how that shows up in the brain and imaging around that.
And now at UVA, it seems like a lot of your shift, your research is focused on extraordinary human experiences, especially like the most recent work that I've been exposed to, outer body experiences.
How do you go from that one thing over and make this really giant swing?
It's a good question, Jonathan.
The thing is, I've always been fascinated by human consciousness and I've always wanted to work with human consciousness.
And the question if consciousness or the mind survives bodily death has always been with me ever since I was little.
And I also knew I wanted to study neuroscience.
I knew I wanted to be a neuroscientist.
But at the same time, the more that I studied about the field of consciousness and if it survives bodily death, I kind of learned that it was a little risky to build my career in terms of PhD and postdoc in that field.
Because it's still very contradictory and it's hard to get funding.
And then if I build my training career in this consciousness field, maybe it was going to be maybe a challenge for me to find a job.
So I decided to build my career as a neuroscientist in mainstream, doing mainstream research.
So that's why I decided, okay, let me study the brain, understand really what's happening in the brain from the micro aspect.
So I did some basic neuroscience, bench work, doing animal models of cognitive aging and brain stimulation and also doing MRI.
So cognitive systems in Alzheimer's disease, understanding neurodegenerative diseases.
So there was like a plan to build my career as a neuroscientist.
So then once I, I would say got recognized as a trustable neuroscientist, I could switch and do the type of research that I've always wanted to do.
But even when I was doing research in Alzheimer's disease, doing my PhD, I was really fascinated about how the mind of patients would just fade away.
So there was always in the back of my mind, you know, I was doing neuroscience in terms of finding MRI biomarkers for their cognitive decline, but I was very interested in understanding what's happening with their minds.
Where is it going? What's happening?
Why are they just their mind of their consciousness is like fading away like a candle that is, you know, slowly blowing away.
So I did do a little bit of consciousness research when I was researching Alzheimer's disease in trying to understand, is there any specific brain regions or brain network that is responsible for that fading away of consciousness and time perception that is altered during Alzheimer's disease.
So that question was always there.
And also when I did my postdoc at UCLA, working with traumatic brain injury patients, many of the patients were in coma were like comatose patients.
So again, they have what we call disorders of consciousness.
And you know, that question was always at the back of my mind, like what's what's happening?
Where is their consciousness?
Is this really a product of the brain?
Maybe in my mind, it wasn't such a huge gap.
My work, like my mainstream neuroscience work and what I'm doing right now at DOPS.
I mean, yes, studying out of body experience was something completely new to me that I've never done before, joining DOPS.
Yeah. I mean, it's so interesting, right?
Because you go into a field and it's a hard science based field.
And like you said, I'm always fascinated by the choices that we make, especially earlier in a career, where we're kind of like, okay, I know that there's this big burning question.
There's this fascination, this interest in me that I would love to pursue.
But I also kind of know that in this particular field, it's going to raise a lot of eyebrows if just straight out of the gate, I go there.
And if I'm getting this right, it was sort of like you made this decision that says, I want to build legitimacy as a real scientist.
I want to be recognized on that level first and then do it long enough so that this question is not going away inside of me.
So that when the time is right and when I decide to shift gears and focus more on these questions around consciousness, that people take me seriously, that I will have built up a reputation by then.
Is that right? Yeah, that's correct.
And I also have to admit that you completely captured my idea.
That's what I wanted to do.
I want to be recognized as a neuroscientist.
And then once I put out my ideas about consciousness and consciousness surviving, brain death, people take me seriously.
They recognize that I am a neuroscientist, that I know how to do science, I know how to apply the scientific method to ask an answer to my questions.
Even nowadays that I'm completely in the field of consciousness and the mind -brain relationship, if I am going to read someone else's work, I am going to look for their credentials first.
Because to me, it matters.
Who is this person saying this thing?
It's something that I still do today.
And to me, it's okay, this person is very respected in the field.
It's like a respected physicist, a respected neuroscientist, a respected philosopher.
So I think that's what I was trying to do for myself.
And that makes so much sense.
I think a lot of people would not along and say like, I totally get that path.
But it's also interesting because it also involves a certain amount of delayed gratification.
Like you have to have a certain amount of patience, say I'm willing to wait sometimes years to get to that place where now I've sort of, quote, earned the right to do more of the work that I really want to do.
And I wonder sometimes we're not patient people as a general role.
And we either race to it too quickly or we just kind of abandon it over time because we fall into a system where we're like, okay, so things are kind of going along.
I've got prestige and status and maybe like a good salary.
And let me just keep on keeping on and forget about those things that deeply fascinated me.
And I wonder sometimes how many people walk away from that really deep burning question.
And I love seeing you go back to yours and say like, now this matters too much to me.
I really want to dive into your research around outer body experiences because it's so fascinating to me.
But you said a couple of times now you make a distinction between consciousness or the mind and the brain.
Can we tease that out a little bit?
Well, we live in a current paradigm that we call physically.
Some people call materialist paradigm, but I would just use the word physicalist paradigm that assumes that the mind is a product or a byproduct of the brain.
So that means that everything that we experience, everything that we perceive, everything that we feel is generated by our brains.
And the reality and the physicalist paradigm also assumes that our reality is primarily physical and space and time are fundamental.
So these are the assumptions of the physicalist paradigm.
At the Division of Perceptual Study, we study phenomena that defy that physicalist paradigm.
So we are studying phenomena that some people call anomalous.
We tend to call them extraordinary because they cannot be easily explained or they cannot be explained at all by the assumption that the mind is created by the brain.
And also the assumption that space and time is fundamental cannot be applied to the type of phenomena that we are studying.
And the type of phenomena I'm talking about is like children that have memories of past lives, near -death experiences, out -of -body experiences, which is my main research.
Some people, they have abilities such as precognition, they have communication with deceased, loved people.
So all of these type of phenomena, they cannot be explained by the physicalist paradigm, which then leads us to, well, the mind is not a product of the brain.
So we have to assume another paradigm.
We have to come up with new ideas.
And then a new idea, which is against the physicalist paradigm, is that the mind is not a byproduct of the brain.
The mind is not generated by the brain.
So one of the theories that tries to replace the physicalism is assumes that the brain would be like a filter.
According to these hypotheses, the brain filter hypotheses, consciousness is everywhere.
And the brain would be like a filter in the sense if you compare to a TV or a radio device.
So the radio waves, they are there everywhere.
We don't see them. And they don't need the radio device to exist.
What the radio device does is to capture those ways and translate them in a way that we can understand.
So that's an analogy for the mind -brain relationship, that the brain being a filter, meaning it's capturing the consciousness that is everywhere and is fundamental.
And our brains are filter that construct cognitively space and time to make sense of our experiences.
How does that, I mean, it's such a fascinating theory.
It feels like it mirrors to a certain extent also the more we've heard in spiritual domains or conversations this notion of the Akashic or the Akashic field, which is this unified field of consciousness.
And what you're saying is the brain essentially, it sort of like pulls down and filters these things into something that feels concrete, that takes shape and form.
Does that also play into what we would understand our sense of identity is?
Yeah, I would say so.
Not always sense of identity, but ourselves in general.
So our personalities, our identities, our memories, our perceptions, our feelings, our emotions, our thoughts, everything is what makes us us.
I don't think these things are generated by the brain.
I think these are fundamental aspects of ourselves, of our consciousness.
So when you decide to go deeper into this idea, and as you said a lot of your work is now focused on this thing described as outer body experiences or out of body experiences, I guess the first thing is when we use the phrase out of body experience, what are we actually talking about here?
It's a good question.
I always like to start with definitions.
Out of body experiences is a phenomenon that the definition varies according to different researchers.
So there are some mainstream researchers that assume the neuroscientific model very materially, is a very physical list and according to these researchers they say that out of body experiences are generated by either alteration or disruption of some brain regions, especially the temporal part of junction which is a region localized
here at the back of our brains, which is responsible for making sense of space and time and our body perception.
So if there is any alteration in that brain region or other regions of the brain then that's going to lead to an out of body experience.
The researchers, they also add on this model and they say there are some psychological features such as higher prone to absorption or fantasy -proneness that people that have these psychological features they are more prone to have out of body experiences.
So this is one model, this is one way of seeing and understanding out of body experiences.
There are other researchers that they assume that an out of body experience is the literal separation between consciousness, what they call a soul or a spirit or the mind.
So it's the separation of this consciousness from the physical body.
So that would be what this out, the word out of body means is like a literal separation.
The way that I understand this phenomenon, an out of body experience is the subjective feeling that someone has during a period of time or during a window that they exist without being in their physical bodies.
So during that time they have the awareness that I exist, I'm still here but I'm not in my physical body anymore.
When I say it's a subjective feeling I like to emphasize that because I don't think that an experience to be called an out of body experience it needs to have a evidence.
For example, like, oh, you need to bring information from somewhere to actually prove that you were out of your body.
So if you just think that this is a subjective feeling, as long as the person had the feeling that they existed without being in their physical bodies you kind of don't need that proof or that evidence anymore.
You just take on someone's word and say, yeah, I had that feeling when I was sleeping, I was having a nap, and then suddenly I woke up and I was flying, I was floating above my body, above my physical body and I could see what was happening in my room, I could see my partner laying down, or I floated
away to another room, to my living room and maybe I saw my family there.
Or maybe sometimes the person just had this out of body experience and went to different dimensions and different realms, you know, when they didn't specifically see their physical bodies or anything objective in this reality, but they still had the feeling of existing and not being in their physical
bodies. So this type of experience is very phenomenologically rich.
People can experience different things while they have the experience of being out of their bodies, but to me what really matters is the feeling that they exist without being in the physical body.
We can't really even go there without establishing what we were just talking about before, which is if you believe that the mind and the brain are the same thing, then there's no real way for this to happen, right?
Because if the mind only exists in the context of the brain, then it can't leave the body.
You can't have an out of body experience.
But if you believe that exists as consciousness exists as something separate from your physical being, then it opens the door to say, okay, so maybe it's possible then for this consciousness to leave the body, to leave the physical state, to leave the brain for a moment in time or however long it may be.
And that's where we get all these different reports of people in an operating room, looking down upon themselves and watching the surgery happening while they're unconscious or like you just described, floating up above when you're napping.
And we'll be right back afterward from our sponsors.
Goodlight Project is sponsored by Quince.
So you know those winter mornings when you're just really cold and all you want to do is wrap yourself in something impossibly warm and soft.
That feeling of pure comfort is what Quince delivers.
The Mongolian cashmere sweater started just $50 and by working directly with ethical factories, they offer premium quality at 50 to 80 % less than similar brands.
Every piece just feels like a high end splurge but comes out with a practical price tag and their super soft fleece sweatpants and responsible down jackets bring that same premium feel without the markup.
I am actually wrapped up in one of my favorite new Quince items as I speak.
It's their stretch sweater fleece shirt that kind of looks like a laid back earthy plaid but feels like this plush soft fleece when it's on.
I'm pretty much living it this winter so far.
Luxuriate in coziness without the luxury price tag.
Go to Quince .com slash GLP for 365 day returns plus free shipping on your order.
That's Q -U -I -N -C -E dot com slash GLP to get free shipping and 365 day returns.
Quince .com slash GLP or just click the link in the show notes.
Good Life Project is sponsored by Masterclass so you know that moment when you discover something so valuable you can't help but share it.
This is how I feel about Masterclass.
I've been spending time with over 200 of the world's most accomplished people as they share their hard earned wisdom and insights.
So after nearly 20 years of writing nonfiction myself I'm actually exploring working on a novel and Masterclass has been so helpful in understanding how to get started and then writing something worth reading.
I'm actually taking their class on storytelling and fiction with Walter Mosley right now and he's helping me just totally rethink the supposed rules and how to break them.
What strikes me the most is how these aren't just classes.
They're transformative experiences and they cover so much from cooking to business writing health and wellness art design and just so much more.
Watch on your phone on your computer or TV even listen in audio mode while you're on the move if you want.
It's no wonder 88 % of members say Masterclass has positively impacted their lives.
Masterclass always has great offerings during the holidays sometimes up to as much as 50 % off.
So head over to Masterclass .com slash Good Life for their current offer.
That's up to 50 % off at Masterclass .com slash Good Life or just click the link in the show notes Masterclass .com slash Good Life.
Hi, this is Farnoosh Tarabi, host of the webby -winning podcast So Money.
If you're aiming for a goal, be it saving for a house, growing your family, or retiring, life makes it difficult to stay the course.
But with a dedicated Merrill advisor, you get a personalized plan and a clear path forward.
Having the bull at your back helps your whole financial life move with you.
So when your plans change, Merrill's with you every step of the way.
Go to ML .com slash bullish to learn more.
Merrill, a Bank of America company, what would you like the power to do?
Investing involves risk Merrill Lynch, Pierce Fenner and Smith Incorporated registered broker dealer, registered investment advisor member SIPC.
Ryan Reynolds here for Mint Mobile.
You know, one of the perks about having four kids that you know about is actually getting a direct line to the big man up North.
And this year, he wants you to know the best gift that you can give someone is the gift of Mint Mobile's unlimited wireless for $15 a month.
Now you don't even need to wrap it.
Give it a try at Mint mobile .com slash switch.
$45 upfront payment required equivalent to $15 per month, new customers on first three month plan only taxes and fees extra speed slower above 40 gigabytes on unlimited cement mobile .com for details.
I guess one of the big questions for me is there are going to be people listening to this and some are like, yeah, like finally somebody's talking about this in a real way to scientifically invalidating my ideas and other people are going to listen to this or watch this and, and roll their eyes and say,
really? We're going there.
We're talking about this.
How do you even begin to have a conversation with people on that level or do you just not?
Do you just say, look, this is an experience that millions of people have reported that has existed for generations over time.
And we're simply studying what's really going on.
But like the phenomenon is real.
Yeah. Yeah. When you said, oh, there is no way someone could be having an out of what experience if there is no separation.
I disagree. I think that even if you have a physicalist mindset and you don't believe there is such a separation, someone can still experience an out of body because as I said, that's the subjective experience that you were out.
Even if you don't believe that you were truly out, if you don't believe there is a separation, you can still experience it.
The difference is that the cause, the way you're going to interpret your experience is going to be different.
You're just going to think it's my brain hallucinating and then in this sense, out of body experiences, they don't form more than let's say dreams.
You know, people still dream during the night and they just assume that dreams are generated by the brain.
So an out of body experience is again generated by the brain.
So that mindset does not prevent anyone from having.
They're just going to give it like different interpretations for it.
And then that leads to your next question.
So how do we study the way we approach out of what experiences is understanding this subjective experiences that people are having.
Obviously, I am interested in the ontology of the experience like is actually, is there actually a separation between the mind and the brain?
But not only that, I think there are many ways we can study out of body experiences without going into the ontological problem.
So one of the ways we can study out of body experiences is understanding if there is a underlying psychopathology behind the phenomenon.
And what we can do, for example, is to compare people that have had out of body experiences with people that have never had out of body experiences in terms of comorbidities such as depression, if they've been diagnosed before with any type of psychiatric illnesses, if they are taking medication, how
socially adjusted they are, if they've had any childhood trauma.
So these are ways we can understand if there is any underlying psychopathology behind these experiences.
Another way to explore them is to understand what are the psychological effects that out of body experiences have on people.
So for example, we know that, anecdotally, the people that have out of body experiences, they have this psychological transformation.
These experiences, they are very powerful on people.
And one of the main effects of having them is to have diminished fear of death and dying.
And that happens because during an out of body experience, the person had the experience, had the subjective experience of existing without being the physical body.
So when they come back to their bodies, they have the belief that they are going to survive again when their bodies die.
So that is a huge transformation that people have after experiencing being out of their bodies.
Another one is just this increased prosocial behavior.
So increased empathy, increased arteries is something else that we already perceive that happens after people having an out of body experience.
And that is mainly because one of the perceptions that people have during these experiences is that we are all interconnected at a deeper level.
So this is one of a very profound experience that leads people to believe that we are fundamentally connected at a deeper level.
So when they come back to their bodies, they're like, okay, so if I hurt my peer, that means I'm also going to be hurting myself.
Or if I hurt someone else, it means I'm going to be hurting the entire system because we are all connected.
So this is another approach that I'm also taking.
What I'm going to do is to deliver questionnaires trying to understand how out of body experiences change people in terms of fear of death and dying, in terms of materialistic values, ego size, psychological well -being, empathy, so all of these different psychological aspects.
Another way that we can understand and approach the study of out of body experiences is to understand what's happening in the brain during these experiences.
And we are also doing this here at DOPs.
For that, we have to overcome a limitation that is the spontaneous nature of these experiences.
So it's a huge limitation and challenge we need to overcome.
Since they are spontaneous, how are we going to understand that we cannot put the person in an MRI or EEG because we don't know when they're going to happen?
So what we've been doing is working with people that can induce these experiences at will, and we ask them to induce these experiences in a very controlled manner, that we can record EEG signal when these people are inducing these experiences, and we are also taking that approach.
And then, obviously, if we want to understand the ontological nature of out of body experiences, is this like a byproduct of the brain, or is there actually anything that, is there any aspect of consciousness that is non -local, is there any perception that transcends space and time?
Obviously, an easy way to do it is to put a target in another room and ask the person to go there and see the target.
We are also doing that type of experiment here, and I think this is being what many researchers have tried to do.
You know, they ask the person, okay, induce your out of body here, either by hypnosis or self -induced or using different types of auditory stimulation, and they put a target in another room.
And if the person is able to bring any perceptions or any information that is distant from the physical body, there would be evidence that something is beyond the brain.
There is another, actually, way of understanding this separation, which would be in the form of apparitions.
So, for example, many people that had out of body experiences, they say that they were seen by third people, or these third people saw, oh yeah, I saw you visiting my house or visiting my room during the middle of the night.
And then that person says, yes, I was having an out of body experience.
So, that would be another type of evidence or experimental approach to understand the ontological nature of out of body experiences.
So, these are all different ways we can understand the phenomenon.
And you see that not all of them assume that consciousness is actually separated from the body.
It's just one way of studying it.
Right. So, I have so many questions now.
Let me see if I can remember some of these.
You start out by saying, okay, so we look at the psychopathological side of it, like is there some other, is there depression, is there trauma, are these other identifiable things?
Do you see, is there research that can correlate the presence of out of body experiences with any particular other psychopathology?
There has been some research into that.
And some researchers do say that OB years, so people that experience out of body experiences, they have higher dissatisfaction with their physical bodies or something they call somatoform dissociation.
They also say that people that tend to have out of body experiences, they have more absorption and fantasy proneness is not necessarily a psychopathology.
They're just psychological traits, but they have been associated and correlated with out of body experiences.
In terms of more psychopathological aspect, there has been some studies showing that somatoform dissociation could be associated with out of body experiences.
But this is not what I see in my research, and I've been talking to many people, and I am currently conducting the very similar type of research in terms of understanding if there is any childhood trauma or any type of social unadjustment or any indication of psychopathology.
And I don't see that, and I just gather data for over 600 people.
So there has been some studies, but I think they're still very controversial and I don't think it's like a fixed idea.
Yes, this is related to any psychopathology.
Which brings me to one of my other questions, which is, you described how some people, I guess, seem to have the ability to almost induce these out of body experiences at will.
Whereas other people, it's a spontaneous thing, it's not planned, it just happens and they probably have no idea how or why it happened or how to reproduce the phenomenon, which as a researcher would be incredibly complex to try and figure out how to study this.
Is there a way that you are able to produce these out of body experiences in people on demand in a lab through brain stimulation, through any other manipulation where fairly regularly you can actually just take anyone off the street, bring them into the lab, and say, okay, we have a pretty high probability
of being able to allow you to experience this?
People have tried to, and some researchers say that they developed virtual reality, experimental design, or if they stimulate some parts of the brain, they will induce out of body experiences in people.
But I personally don't see the way I think that the type of experiences these researchers are generating, they're very different from a real out of body experience, which is the feeling of existence, the subjective feeling of detachment from the physical body.
Those experiments, like virtual reality induced or brain stimulation induced, I'm going to say quote unquote out of body, they are more like alterations in your bodily perception.
What people will feel, for example, that their legs are shrinking or their whole body is increasing or sometimes they will see only, they will even see their physical bodies from outside but it's only half of the body.
So these experiences, they don't feel real, they feel very illusionary.
And it's completely different from an out of body experience that it feels very real.
Sometimes it feels more real than reality itself and people don't lose the sense of agency.
They are still themselves, they still have their personalities, they still have their thoughts, their emotions, they are just not in their physical body anymore.
And when they see their physical body, there is no change.
It's completely how they actually are.
So there is no distortion in the physical body, it's just the feeling that I'm not there anymore.
So I think these are artificially induced out of body experiences is very different from the type of experience that I am studying here at DOPS.
But that is not to say that someone cannot be trained to have.
So I just think it's a little harder, it's not like just come to the lab and let's do a virtual reality or a brain stimulation and you're going to have one.
There are people that can induce such experiences and they can be induced through hypnosis, as I said.
They can be induced with psychedelic compounds.
They can be induced only with meditation and visualization techniques but these are a little harder.
You know, usually people take many years to learn how to have one.
I do think and I have seen people that can have these experiences in a controlled manner, in a lab because we've done so, but we are not using any type of virtual reality or brain stimulation to induce these experiences.
We rely on the person's own techniques to induce them.
Got it. It is kind of wild to think about how complex this actually is and like, when somebody is having this out of body experience that's entirely subjective, like how do you on the outside understand like who's having the real one, who's having like the one that's induced through some sort of external
mechanism that's kind of real but not really.
And then when you're trying to study and figure out what's really happening here and how does it affect people, just trying to make a distinction between sort of, quote, a real out of body experience and something that wouldn't really qualify is got to be and that's really thorny just from like running
a science experiment standpoint.
I just want to clarify a little bit.
When you say like a real out of body experience, to me, all of them are real as long as the person feels disembodied.
People come to me and describe their experiences and they say, this is what I failed.
And then people will ask, did I have an out of body experience?
And then I ask back, did you feel that at that moment you existed without being a physical body?
And then if the person says, yes.
And then I said, so I think you had an out of body experience.
And that is real. The experience itself is real.
It's like a dream. Are dreams real?
Well the experience of dreaming is real.
So that's a little different if the person actually went outside and then again we go back into the ontological question, like what is the nature of the experience?
We cannot answer to that question with the subjective feelings that the person had, but all of them are real.
Got it. You mentioned also this sort of an experimental design where you would have somebody potentially induce this state in a lab, have in another room a target where you know there was something that was identifiable that the person had not been exposed to, they couldn't have known.
And then ask them to effectively, when they're out of body, travel there, tell you what's there and come back.
And then when they return to their body, tell you like, what was it?
Are these experiments being done?
Have you seen any data around outcomes around this?
Yeah, they have been done.
And I did those experiments just a few months ago.
Those type of experiments testing the, what we call, verticality of an out of body experience.
So like bringing a vertical information that can be tested.
They've been done mostly decades ago, I would say in the 70s, in the 60s and the 70s and the 80s.
That's when parapsychologists, they conducted the bulk of the research testing, the verticality.
And then early 2000s, when we saw like neuroimaging techniques coming and brain stimulation, the neuroscientific model of neuro, of an out of body experience it like took over and people are just trying to understand.
The focus changed into trying to understand what's happening in the brain and explaining an out of body experience through the lenses of neuroscience and it's just an alteration in the brain.
Nowadays, there is like very few researchers doing that type of research into testing the verticality of out of body experiences.
We do test our participants because again, I am also interested in understanding the ontological nature of these experiences.
The first time we tested was a few months ago in July, when I went to Brazil to work with participants that can induce these experiences at will.
And we did experiments with 21 participants that claimed to induce them at will with a reasonable success rate.
And we brought 64 channel portable EEG to understand, so record brain activity during these experiences.
And we also placed the target in another room.
So for the target, we preselected 100 objects that were in a white background and objects like just a day to day objects, I would say like a house or a flower, a pencil, a pair of shoes, a computer.
So we preselected a pool of 100 objects and then during the experiments, the computer randomly chose one of the objects and displayed in the monitor.
And the researchers, we did not have access, so we were completely blind to what object, what target was being displayed.
We just pressed the button, the script generated, but we were not looking at the computer when this happened.
And we had a camera recording the door, so if anyone went to the room, we have everything recorded and none of the, as I said, none of the researchers known what the target was.
And then when the experiments were finished, we would just press ask and then it would shut down whatever was being displayed.
So we were completely blind to the experiments.
We were trying to avoid sensory leakage or any type of like body language reading or anything like that from the participants.
We are just now starting to analyze the data, so unfortunately right now I don't have anything to tell you on how the participants went, how, if they were able to perceive, but six out of the 21 participants were able to come with some type of perception, and the perceptions would range from colors,
like some people just saw colors and shapes, and other people would say, I think it's a flower, you know, it's something related to a flower, and others would come with perceptions more like saying, I was at the beach, and there was something related to the beach here.
So the type of perception changed a lot, and we had six participants coming with some type of perception from our experiments.
I mean, fascinating, so it's just sort of a little bit of a cliffhanger then.
Wait and see what the data analysis shows us.
And we'll be right back after a word from our sponsors.
Good. Life project is sponsored by Aqua Truth.
So you know, I have always believed that staying hydrated is just so important for wellness, but the quality of your water, it matters just as much as the quantity.
I was shocked to learn that three out of four homes in America have harmful contaminants in their tap water.
That is why I am still so excited about Aqua Truth after being a customer myself for probably about four years now.
Their countertop purifiers remove 15 times more contaminants than ordinary filters with no installation needed, which I love.
One set of filters makes 4 ,500 bottles' worth of pure water, great for your health and the environment.
So if you're ready to transform your water, Aqua Truth comes with a 30 -day money -back guarantee, and even makes a great gift.
Today our listeners receive 20 % off any Aqua Truth purifier.
Just go to aqua truth dot com slash goodlife.
That's A -Q -U -A -T -R -U dot com forward slash G -O -O -D -L -I -F -E and automatically receive 20 % off.
That's 20 % off any Aqua Truth water purifier when you go to aqua truth dot com slash goodlife or click the link in the show notes.
Ryan Reynolds here for Mint Mobile.
You know, one of the perks about having four kids that you know about is actually getting a direct line to the big man up north.
And this year he wants you to know the best gift that you can give someone is the gift of Mint Mobile's unlimited wireless for $15 a month.
Now, you don't even need to wrap it.
Give it a try at MintMobile dot com slash Switch.
$45 up front payment required equivalent to $15 per month.
New customers on first three -month plan only, taxes and fees extra, speeds lower above 40 gigabytes on unlimited, cement mobile dot com for details.
We all have dreams.
Dream home renovations, dream vacations or sending our kids to their dream colleges.
But finding straightforward ways to turn those dreams into realistic goals, that's where things get tricky.
Merrill understands that.
That's why with a dedicated Merrill advisor, you get a personalized plan and a clear path forward.
And having the bull at your back helps your whole financial life move with you.
So when your plans change, Merrill is with you every step of the way.
Go to ML dot com slash bullish to learn more.
Merrill, a Bank of America company.
What would you like the power to do?
Investing involves risk.
Merrill Lynch, Pierce Fenner and Smith Incorporated, registered broker dealer, registered investment advisor, member SIPC.
This episode is brought to you by Progressive Insurance, fiscally responsible financial geniuses, monetary magicians.
These are things people say about drivers who switch their car insurance to progressive and save hundreds.
Visit progressive dot com to see if you could save.
Progressive casualty insurance company and affiliates, potential savings will vary, not available in all states or situations.
As you're describing the outer body experience also, and this is something that you've spoken to or written about as well, the notion of ego dissolution, I think, comes to mind as well.
And we hear this, I think a lot of people have heard this phrase, you know, psychedelics have become a big part of the conversation.
The zeitgeist, there's research going on in the US now around it.
And one of the common experiences that people report has been what I've heard more clinically described as ego dissolution.
Where does that fit in, if at all, in the context of the conversation around out of body experiences?
Well, this is another thing that I'm trying to understand, how the concept of ego dissolution relates to out of body experience.
I recently just wrote a manuscript proposing that out of body experiences lead to increased empathy and prosocial behavior through ego dissolution, which, as you said, is a well -known phenomenon in psychedelic research.
What is interesting is that many psychedelic compounds do lead to an out of body experience, especially 5MODMT is the one that is highly known to induce obese.
So what I proposed is that an out of body experience leads to the experience of ego dissolution, where there is no ego anymore, there is experience of ego death.
And once you experience the ego death, you understand that there are no walls anymore, like the invisible walls that separate us from each other, from the universe and from all beings.
And then you understand that we are all connected at a deeper level.
And that leads to increased empathy, empathy and prosocial behavior.
The concept itself of ego dissolution outside the context of psychedelic research is not very well explored and understood.
What I did so far is just borrow this concept from psychedelics and brought to out of body experiences.
But I don't think that all of the out of body experiences lead to the ego dissolution phenomena.
I think that some of them can be very ordinary in the sense that people just quickly have this experience, they get scared and they quickly go back to their bodies without integrating, without requiring a cognitive accommodation, without reframing their beliefs, without actually experiencing this ego
dissolution. So I think there is a very strong relationship between out of body and ego dissolution.
But I don't think there is like a one to one relationship.
So then it would make, tell me if this makes sense, then, that if somebody were to have an OBE, an out of body experience, and during that experience, they also had this experience of ego dissolution, of their ego effectively dissolving and a loss of perception of barriers between them and other people,
other beings, that when they come back from that experience, would that then be the person who would be much more likely to then be the person who experienced a deepening of empathy, prosocial behavior versus somebody who had an out of body experience without ego dissolution?
Yes, in terms of increased understanding of interconnectedness and this feeling of oneness, I think the experience of ego dissolution plays an important role.
But there are other effects of out of body experience, like the belief of survival beyond your bodily death.
I don't think that necessarily is related to the ego dissolution.
I think that if the person sees and experiences existence without being a physical body, even without having this ego dissolution experience, that leads to the belief in an afterlife.
That makes a lot of sense.
Do you feel like somebody could also have an out of body experience, come back from it, and then no sense of ego dissolution at all?
They're still up there and they're like, this is me floating above me.
I don't have any sense of anything there being dissolved or that they could come back, and then also experience that sense of empathy that you were talking about, that sense of oneness.
That's a good question.
I think so. I think the change in empathy, this is what I've been talking to many people that come to me and say, oh, my empathy hasn't changed after my OBE.
I think one factor here is it depends on the baseline levels.
Some people are already very empathic, and some people already have this high feeling of interconnectedness.
So I don't think an out of body experience is going to change much.
Depending on the beliefs and the personality of the person.
So I think that if the person did not have that experience before in terms of, I'm just a physical individual and I have no connection with my peers, and I have no connection to the universe or nature, it could definitely change after an out of body experience.
But again, I think it depends also a lot on the baseline levels and the personality of the person.
Right. You use the word integration also, and that's another word that I've heard used in the context of psychedelic research often described as this is what happens after you come back.
That you've just had this experience that shattered your understanding of what is and what isn't.
Maybe had that ego dissolution experience and an out of body experience, which often is a part of that.
But if you just walk out of the therapist's office or the clinic or wherever you're doing it or other contexts that some people will do, and you just never do anything with that, that would be a very different experience than somebody who comes back and then actually goes through some sort of thoughtful
process of integration.
Talk to me about this.
Yeah. I think the process of integration is very important.
As you said, also in psychedelic research, more and more we see that the integration of the experience is part of the entire process.
In clinical trials, it's very important how the person sees and how the person integrates everything that they experienced.
It's not different to doing an out of body experience.
What we see is that people that don't talk about their experiences.
The main reason why they don't talk about the experiences is because they don't want to be ridiculed.
They don't want to be dismissed away.
Because the experience feels very real.
They don't want anyone else saying, this is just a dream, or you just imagine this is a hallucination.
What people do is generally they fear the stigma and they shut down.
I would say the most people never shared, they ever had an out of body experience.
But inside, a lot changed.
People just don't want to share because they are scared of being ridiculed.
But if you actually talk to someone and understand what changed, they are going to say a lot changed.
Like, I no longer fear death, or I'm more empathic, or I understand things better.
I had many existential insights.
This is another effect.
People have existential insights during their experiences.
I think the role of integration is especially important depending on what your belief was before the experience.
If you are a person that is a physicalist and you don't believe you could ever exist without being in your physical body, but then you experience it, it's going to be a shock.
It's going to be an ontological shock, and like, what do you do out of it?
And again, because the experience feels so real, it's really hard for people to integrate and it requires a lot of what we call cognitive accommodation.
But if the person has already a belief that consciousness is not a product of my brain and then they have these experiences, I would say they probably need less integration.
They need less cognitive accommodation because what they experienced was in accordance to what they believed before.
Yeah. I mean, that makes sense to me.
It's sort of like, you know, they already had a model of themselves, the world consciousness that this matched up with, so it's not so jarring.
Whereas if somebody was completely opposite and then this kind of blows apart the model of their existence, I would imagine there's a lot more processing would have to happen for them to figure out, like, what do I do with it?
Because it's almost like it blows up a really important belief system and then they've got to reassemble a new belief system in a way that allows them to be okay.
And it's very hard to come up with a new belief system.
As I said, it requires a lot of cognitive accommodation.
It's not something that we do overnight.
I've been through this process twice of changing my belief system and it took me many years to come with a new one.
So it's really hard.
Some people really don't want to talk about it or it's just easier for them to dismiss what they experienced because it's just too hard to come and, you know, just disregard whatever you believed before.
It takes a lot of courage and it takes a lot of effort to come with a new paradigm.
Which I think gets down to also, if you look at the research that you're doing and gaining a better understanding of what out -of -body experiences are and aren't, how they affect us, how they can sometimes affect us in really powerful ways.
I mean, what's your sense for what the practical application is, both on an individual and a societal level?
I know this kind of a big question.
Yeah. I think there is a huge impact at the individual level.
You know, once you understand or once you have the feeling that we are all interconnected at a deeper level, you stop acting so selfishly, you know, because you are able to put yourself in someone else's shoes and you understand that hurting others means hurting yourself and hurting the larger consciousness
system, let's put it this way.
Not only that, but how we live our lives.
Everything is so intertwined in the materialist view and the physicalist view, this new paradigm.
It leads so much into how people live their lives in terms of buying and giving so much importance to money and pursuing and pursuing and pursuing physical things instead of just looking inside and trying to learn and experience new things and growing from a spiritual perspective.
But also the way that people treat each other.
I would say that these experiences, they come back transformed not only from an out of body, but a near -death experience.
You know, they're very impactful experiences that change people completely.
They want to live fuller lives.
The way they treat others is completely different.
Many of them give up on previous jobs because they want to do something that brings meaningful to their lives.
It changes how they treat their family.
They want to spend more time with their families.
They want to spend more time doing things that are meaningful to them.
Sometimes they even change their diet and they stop eating animals because they see that animals are suffering.
So, there are many different ways that this changes people.
And by changing individuals, you change the society.
Because I would say that the way we are living our lives today is so much focused on money and capitalism and the way we elect our whoever is representing us in the government.
Everything has to do with the paradigm that each one has inside, the way we live our lives and what we believe of what happens in terms of consciousness and the brain.
Yeah. I mean, it's fascinating because the implications are potentially huge.
Let's stream a little bit.
Zoom the lens out. If there was a way to pretty consistently allow almost anybody to induce an out of body experience in a safe way, in a repeatable way, do you ever envision or dream of a world where every person could experience this?
It's almost like a doctor or a psychiatrist would write a script for an OBE, for an out of body experience.
It's like you're going through certain things or you're very self -centered or narcissism or whatever it may be.
Or maybe you're doing okay, but you're just looking at the way that you're living your life and kind of feeling like there's something more.
Do you envision a future where there's some way to systematically and safely allow anybody who would like to experience this to induce it and that by allowing that, the net effect just on them and also just at large could be potentially transformative?
Well, I do envision that.
There are some people using virtual reality forms of disembodiment to see if it changes like a decreased fear of death.
People are using that in hospices or in research to make people feel more comfortable with death.
I do think a way of changing society would be asking everyone to have out of body experiences or near death experiences so then they could experience all these transformative effects.
But at the same time, the only reason we would require someone to have an experience to change this road view is because someone was raised in this road view in the first place.
So another way of changing this is why are we teaching kids the physicalist paradigm?
Why are we teaching kids?
I mean, I do understand that this is the prevailing paradigm, but assuming that a personal experience is what requires someone to change is because originally they had their mindsets into that paradigm.
There is some research here, my colleague, Bruce Grayson and Marietta Pelivanova, they're doing research in near -death experiences and they were able to show that only by reading near -death experiences that changes people too.
You don't necessarily need to have had one.
So if you read and if you listen to people that have had these experiences and if you learn from their teachings, that also affect others.
So that's very powerful.
But my point is, why does it take that personal individual changes once, rather we could just change what we are teaching to kids and teaching them that there is this interconnection, you know, that we could teach empathy or we could teach other forms of prosocial behavior and without necessarily having
one of these experiences.
I never had an out -of -body experience myself.
It doesn't mean that I don't think I needed to have one and I see many of my friends and people close to me that never had any of these extraordinary experiences and yet they are able to have this different road view and understand that it's important to spiritually and grow, you know, that we are more
than just this physical reality.
It took me many years to accept this roadset and this mindset.
It was through a lot of reading and reading about the evidence, but I really see that changing in the future where we change the paradigm and we teach kids how to be different.
So then they don't need to have the experiences to be better people.
It's almost like just having convincing knowledge or witnessing these experiences or having them explained in a way that actually just kind of makes sense could be enough to really cede the shifts that we're talking about.
It feels like a good place for us to come full circle in our conversation as well.
So in this container of Good Life Project, if I offer up the phrase to live a good life, what comes up?
To live a good life, I would say is to embrace your experiences.
Embrace your anomalous experiences.
Embrace your extraordinary experiences.
Most of people have had something and they have a huge potential to teach people that we are more than just our physical bodies.
And by understanding that we are more than our physical bodies, we understand that there is nothing to be scared and death is only a passage, death is only a going home.
And if we are not scared of death and dying anymore, we are not scared of living.
Thank you. Okay, before you leave, if you love this episode of Safe Bed, you'll also love the conversation we had with Anna Yousim on the science of spirituality.
I find your link to that episode in the show notes.
This episode of Good Life Project was produced by executive producers, Lindsey Foxx and me, Jonathan Fields, editing help by Alejandro Ramirez, Christopher Carter, crafted our theme music and special thanks to Shelly Adell for her research on this episode.
And of course, if you haven't already done so, please go ahead and follow Good Life Project in your favorite listening app.
And if you found this conversation interesting or inspiring or valuable and chances are you did since you're still listening here, would you do me a personal favor, a seven second favor and share it maybe on social or by text or by email, even just with one person.
Just copy the link from the app you're using and tell those you know, those you love, those you want to help navigate this thing called life a little better so we can all do it better together with more ease and more joy.
Tell them to listen, then even invite them to talk about what you've both discovered because when podcasts become conversations and conversations become action, that's how we all come alive together.
Until next time, I'm Jonathan Fields, signing off for Good Life Project.
This episode is brought to you by Progressive Insurance.
Do you ever find yourself playing the budgeting game?
Well, with the name your price tool from Progressive, you can find options that fit your budget and potentially lower your bills.
Try it at progressive .com, Progressive Casualty Insurance Company and Affiliates, Price and Coverage Match Limited by State Law, not available in all states.
We all have dreams.
Dream home renovations, dream vacations, or sending our kids to their dream colleges.
But finding straightforward ways to turn those dreams into realistic goals?
That's where things get tricky.
Maril understands that.
That's why with a dedicated Maril advisor, you get a personalized plan and a clear path forward.
And having the bull at your back helps your whole financial life move with you.
So when your plans change, Maril is with you every step of the way.
Go to ML .com slash bullish to learn more.
Maril, a Bank of America company, what would you like the power to do?
Investing involves risk.
Maril Lynch, Pierce Fenner & Smith Incorporated, registered broker dealer, registered investment advisor, member SIPC.
Shape your tomorrow.
Extrackers offers innovative opportunities to enable you to take your financial future into your own hands.
With ETFs that make access easy, transparent, and cost effective.
Start your investment for the future at Extrackers .com.
Together we grow. All investments involve risk, including loss of principle.
Information on the fund's investment objectives, risk factors, charges, and expenses can be found in the fund's prospectus at Extrackers .com.
Read it carefully before investing.
Distributed by ALPS Distributors, Inc.
Build a perfect holiday meal with exceptionally flavorful ingredients from Whole Foods Market.
Look for sales on Luscious Bone and Beef Rib Roast, Golden King Crab Clusters, and Organic Spiral Cup Bone and Ham.
Complete your spread with fresh seasonal produce, savory sides, and expert crafted desserts from the Whole Foods Market Bakery.
Or simply order crowd pleasing holiday catering, including mains, platters, and more at shop .wfm .com.
Terms apply.
