This is the Global News Podcast from the BBC World Service.
I'm Charlotte Gallagher and in the early hours of Wednesday, the 18th of February, these are our main stories.
The ongoing Iran-US nuclear talks we hear from Geneva and our correspondent in Tehran.
Congress in Peru votes to remove its interim president on corruption charges and why the prospects of war in northern Ethiopia are growing.
Also in this podcast, the German drugs giant Bayer offers to pay more than 10 billion to settle claims that its weed killer Roundup caused cancer.
And are Russian athletes about to be allowed back into the Olympics?
Fears of a military conflict between Iran and the US appear to have eased after the Iranian foreign minister said the two sides had made progress in Geneva at the latest talks on some guiding principles that could pave the way for a nuclear deal.
But the view from Washington is less optimistic, with the US Vice President J.D.
Vance giving a more downbeat assessment on Fox News.
In some ways, it went well.
They agreed to meet afterwards.
But in other ways it was very clear that the president has set some red lines that the Iranians are not yet willing to actually acknowledge and work through.
So we're going to keep on working it.
But of course the president reserves the ability to say when he thinks that diplomacy has reached its natural end.
We hope we don't get to that point.
But if we do, that'll be the president's call.
Donald Trump has changed his position on Iran repeatedly in recent days and weeks, at times calling for regime change, then saying he believes a deal is possible.
During the recent anti-government protests, for example, he initially pledged to help protesters, saying the US was locked and loaded, but then thousands of them were killed by their own government and the threat of an imminent US military strike receded, despite a rapid and significant build-up of American warships in the region.
Kazran Adji from BBC Persian is in Geneva.
He gave us this assessment.
The talks have now ended and the Iranian side has commented on it.
We have the Iranian foreign minister sounding positive, saying that the whole atmosphere was more positive this time and that the two sides are negotiating and the direction is a good direction.
But he also adds that the differences are such that bringing them together takes a lot of work.
So it seems that at least the Iranian side thinks that there's going to be another round of talks between Iran and the US, although the Iranian foreign minister says they haven't fixed when.
The next round of talks is going to be held or where indeed.
But nevertheless it seems that we are one step away from eventual war, if you might sort of call it, because the Americans are bringing in more military hardware.
Another huge aircraft carrier is on its way here.
So these talks were held under that massive sort of threat of military intervention.
The Iranian side is aware of that, is very keen to say that they're going to talk about Iran's nuclear issue.
But the Iranian foreign minister said what is not on the table is surrender.
Our chief international correspondent, Lise Doucette, is in Tehran.
I have to say that here in Tehran, we had spoken to one of the top negotiators, the deputy foreign minister, Majid Takht-Ravanchi, just before they left for Geneva.
And he was really indicating that the...
Iranians understood now that they had to make compromises if they wanted to see sanctions lifted.
And so we believe that they did make some compromise proposals and that may be helping to move the talks along.
Both sides are saying they prefer a deal.
They hope they can do it through diplomacy.
But both sides as well are saying they're preparing for war.
Yesterday, Iran announced that its elite Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps were carrying out naval drills in the Strait of Hormuz.
That's an absolutely critical waterway for the world's maritime traffic.
So both of them are saying don't... For President Trump, he's saying...
If you don't do a deal, I'm going to hit you again.
And remember Iran did see that 12 day war last year with Israel which drew in the United States attacking its nuclear sites.
And Iran is saying, well, if you hit us, we're going to hit you back with even greater force.
You really feel that this is the twilight zone, where you have an 86-year-old supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who his health is ailing.
He's always been a very cautious leader, and now he has presided over.
There was a war last year, so there's been this new wave of protests.
Huge challenges facing the Islamic Republic.
In fact, the biggest challenges that they have faced to their rule since their own uprising in 1979, which ousted the Shah.
Is there going to be a deal?
There's some signs in which there could possibly be a new deal.
Will that be enough?
Will it just be a pause or will there be another deadly war?
It is a moment of great unpredictability and also of great peril.
Lise Doucette in Tehran, where she's been allowed to report by the authorities on condition that none of her material is used on the BBC's Persian service.
Straight.
After those talks in Geneva, the US took part in another set of negotiations in the Swiss city, this time on Ukraine, just days before the fourth anniversary of Russia's full-scale invasion.
A major sticking point is Moscow's demand for Ukrainian forces to withdraw entirely from the eastern Donbass region a red line for Kiev.
And hours before the talks got underway, there was another wave of Russian attacks on Ukrainian energy facilities.
Those talks will resume on Wednesday, but expectations are low.
To get a Ukrainian perspective on the push for peace.
Our international editor, Jeremy Bowen, spoke to Brigadier General Oleksandr Pivnenko, commander of the National Guard of Ukraine.
He began by asking him what victory for Ukraine would look like.
For me personally, it means stopping the killing of our soldiers and the civilian population of Ukraine.
In military terms, it means taking back our territories.
I understand that perhaps this is not realistic today, but potentially in the future it is very important.
I believe that at the moment the priority is a ceasefire and survival.
The Americans seem to have an idea that it will require you to agree to the Russian demand to give up territory that you still hold in the east, which are considered to be important to Ukrainian defence.
I actually believe that this is impossible at the moment.
A ceasefire along the line of contact is something we can still understand.
But no one will give up territories.
If there is an order to withdraw, then we will withdraw.
But will the population of our country accept that?
Because we could have negotiated and simply given up, for example, Luhansk and Donbass, and ended the war there.
We have lost too many of our people and too much territory to simply stop and just give away land.
Now.
The Russians made a lot of mistakes early on in the war, but what I've read is that they've made a lot of advances with drones and some analysts say that they're ahead of Ukraine in that.
Is that correct?
Yes, that is true.
At the beginning, they did not pay attention at all, but now they act very intelligently.
They know what they are doing and they know how to use the resources they have.
I believe the enemy is very strong and learns very quickly.
I've listened to Donald Trump a lot since he became president again.
He believes that you have to make a deal because otherwise you are going to lose.
We are losing territories.
But you know, we are a very difficult opponent in this war.
The price Russia is paying for this war is very high.
We may be losing territories, but we are striking their economy, their manpower and their equipment.
For them the wartime period may not feel as hard, but after the war it will be much harder because they will have to explain to their people what this war was for and what the losses were.
But do you think that Donald Trump is correct when he says, unless you do a ceasefire deal very soon, that there's a risk you'll lose the war?
Not entirely.
We can fight for several more years.
But I believe that in general, killing people for territories and resources, this is not the Middle Ages.
This war must end.
Everyone feels this fatigue.
But everyone wants the war to end.
The main question for us is, at what price?
A ceasefire.
I think everyone would agree to that.
But loss of territory?
We will not give anything away.
Every Ukrainian you ask will tell you the same.
No one will give anything away just like that.
That was Brigadier General Oleksandr Pivnenko speaking to Jeremy Bowen.
Peru has been plunged into a fresh wave of political chaos after Congress voted to remove its interim president, José Harry, on corruption charges.
It was an overwhelming vote against him, just months after he was chosen to lead the country, after the previous president was ousted over allegations of corruption and links to organised crime.
Some took to the streets to protest about Harry's scandals, including allegations about the women he's appointed.
He was incapable.
Women entered all the time and left with high salaries.
Who does this money belong to?
The people.
He said these women went to the palace for work.
What work?
What work have they done?
I've been speaking to the BBC's Latin America expert Luis Fajardo.
Peru has been experiencing a very substantial amount of political instability.
The last issue involving the interim president, José Heri, following a series of scandals, the latest which was called by the Peruvian media Chifagate, referring to the name given to Chinese restaurants, like the one where Heri was seen apparently meeting with a Chinese businessman.
There were allegations.
And, as a result, a series of political events took place that finally led, this Tuesday, to the removal of Harry by the Peruvian legislature.
This is only two months before the presidential election, which is due on April.
And what has Jose Harry said?
Jose Heri repeatedly had insisted in his innocence, as has been the case of nearly seven previous leaders in Peru who had been removed from office.
All of them have said that they had done nothing wrong.
However, they have been facing, again, this extreme amount of political instability.
It is said that it is because of institutional design in Peru, the fact that it is relatively easy for the Peruvian legislature to remove leaders presidents, from office, and also a great deal of very negative public attitude towards politicians.
There's a lot of belief that the political class in Peru is unresponsive to citizens' needs.
After this repeated scandal,
And this has created this situation where Peru has experienced again multiple presidents over a short period of time of a few years.
What, Luis, are the people of Peru looking for in a leader?
What do they want them to change about Peru or improve about Peru?
Peru is in an unusual situation in Latin America in the sense that its economy is doing relatively well.
Actually, Peru is one of the leading exporters, receiving a lot of investment both from the US and from China and from other places.
So the economic problems that are at the center of the discussion many times in other parts of Latin America are not so intense in Peru.
What people definitely are arguing against is is against this sense of corruption in the public sphere, of impropriety from the leaders in Peru.
And time and time again, they have elected outsiders who have promised to clean up Peruvian politics.
And time and time again, they have been disappointed.
And this is, according to many experts, part of the explanation for this political instability the fact that people have really lost trust in a lot of Peruvian political institutions.
So what happens now?
Who's going to be in charge?
The Peruvian legislature is due to meet on Wednesday to select a new interim president, who would be in charge of the office until the elections in April.
This is not unprecedented in Peru, again contributing to the sense of political instability across the country.
To Ethiopia now, where there are growing fears that a major regional conflict could be about to break out.
The last time that happened was in late 2020, resulting in an absolutely ruinous two-year war in which hundreds of thousands may have died.
There was also mass sexual violence and systematic starvation.
Once again, rival forces are gathering from both the federal government and the Tigray region.
So what's caused this escalation?
Gertil Tromvall is a professor of peace and conflict studies at Oslo New University College and a specialist on the region.
The main antagonist might be Eritrea and Ethiopia.
Their relationship has been deteriorating since actually, the peace agreement with the former war in Tigray in 2022.
When they were allies in that war, they have now turned against each other.
So that's the main confrontation.
But Tigray forces, as you mentioned, they have aligned themselves apparently with Eritrea.
So it is also a conflict brewing between Addis Ababa, the federal government and the regional authorities in Tigray.
And what's the reason for the breakdown in relations between Ethiopia and Eritrea, who themselves fought an absolutely awful war getting on for 30 years ago?
Then there was a peace agreement just before the turn of the millennium.
What's prompted this breakdown in relations?
Well, according to Ethiopian authorities, they are accusing Eritrea of being on their soil as an enemy force.
Eritrean soldiers are in Ethiopia, they claim, in northern Ethiopia.
They are accusing Eritrea of abiding and abetting Ethiopian insurgencies, particularly the Fano-Amhara insurgency, but also the Oromo.
We have seen over the last year and a half that Ethiopia has been ticking off all the boxes to portray Eritrea as an enemy, hostile state, due to their destabilizing activity and also encroachment on Ethiopian territory.
And this is done in a way, both in formal letters to the UN Secretary General, but also direct responses to the Asmara government, in order possibly to justify the right of self-defense against Eritrea.
You're saying look the main source of tension.
We should be looking at an international conflict between Ethiopia and Eritrea.
But the chances are is that it could play out in the north, which obviously would make sense geographically because they share a northern border.
Well, the Pretoria Secession of Hostilities Agreement, which was signed in November 2022, ending the war on Tigray, has not been fully implemented.
There are key issues of return of internally displaced people.
There are about one million Tigrayans not being displaced from their homes, and also return of control of territories.
West Tigray and parts of Southern Tigray are not under the administrative control of the Tigrayan authorities.
Kjetil Tromvall, a professor at New University College in Oslo, talking to Tim Franks.
Still to come.
In this podcast, prosecutors in Sweden say they suspect a man may have exploited and sold his wife for sex with more than 100 other men.
These are shocking and horrific accounts.
It's a form of slavery.
Men should not be buying women's bodies.
The German drugs giant Bayer is offering to pay more than 10 billion to settle claims over the weed killer Roundup, which has been linked with cancer.
Most of the settlement money would go to resolving current and future legal claims.
Samira Hussain reports.
Bayer has been dogged by the Roundup cancer claims after the German pharmaceutical firm bought Monsanto, the company that made the weed killer a decade earlier.
Over the years, the company has had to pay billions of dollars in lawsuits, despite glyphosate, the main ingredient in the weed killer, being deemed safe by regulators around the world.
According to the proposal, anyone who can prove they were diagnosed with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and were exposed to Roundup before February 17 of this year can file a claim and receive a portion of the settlement.
That was Samira Hussain.
NASA is warning there is no known protection against thousands of asteroids which space chiefs say they can't track down.
The space debris of various sizes is shooting around close to our planet and they say it could cause damage if one were to hit a populated area on Earth.
Dr Hannah Wakeford is Associate Professor in Astrophysics at the University of Bristol in England.
We asked her what scientists are doing to mitigate the danger.
We are looking for these, what have been dubbed these city killers, because they're asteroids in this middle size region.
If you have something much, much bigger, it's a kind of cataclysmic event like what happened before the annihilation of the dinosaurs.
And if you have something small, we see it break up in our atmosphere and we get small meteorites hitting the Earth many times a year and it does very little.
There's this middle ground where something bad could happen that won't be a planet killer, but could very much cause significant damage.
And those are the middle ground ones that are the hardest for us to find.
Why haven't we done anything about it?
We have been doing stuff about it for many, many decades now.
There are a number of different telescope missions, as well as scientific investigations that are being done continuously to hunt for these.
It's just a really hard thing to do.
There's still, we think, tens of thousands left that we need to discover and categorize and understand.
In the coming years.
We've got a number of different surveys going online, like the Vera Rubin Observatory, which is in Chile, which will be surveying the sky every single night for 10 years.
And we'll be able to find hundreds, thousands of these rocks.
And we've got other telescopes, like JWST, which is the biggest telescope we've ever sent into space, that is going to be surveying our nearby asteroid field and trying to understand and characterize these medium-sized objects.
We had this really amazing experiment, which was launched in 2021 and actually impacted an asteroid, a nearby asteroid.
It was a mission called DART.
And the idea was that if we fly a spacecraft at high velocity into an asteroid, can we change its trajectory.
Can we change where it's going to end up hitting?
And this was a really successful mission.
But it took four years for us to build DART.
And it took 10 months for it to get out to the asteroid, to impact it and change its position in the sky.
So it takes a little bit of time.
So what we always want for this is just pre-warning.
That was Dr. Hannah Wakeford.
A major change in international sport and as so often with these things, it's not so much the sport but the politics because the International Paralympic Committee has voted to allow athletes from Russia and Belarus to compete under their national flags at next month's Winter Games.
It would overturn the ban imposed four years ago after Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine.
Katie Forkingham is a BBC sports reporter at the Winter Olympics.
We've been told that six Russian and four Belarusian athletes will be able to compete under their flags at the Winter Paralympics which start next month.
It's the first time that we'll have seen a Russian flag at a Paralympics since the Sochi 2014 Games so well over a decade.
How this has come about is basically the International Paralympic Committee lifted its ban on athletes from the two countries competing at the Games at the end of last year.
The governing bodies that govern the specific sports... said, we're refusing to do that.
In December, Russia and Belarus appealed to the Court of Arbitration for Sport against the decision made by the governing body for skiing and snowboarding.
And they won that appeal, which meant that skiers and snowboarders from those two countries could start to compete and accumulate the ranking points that they would need for the.
The two countries have been awarded what are called bipartite invitations to compete at the Games.
The one that's relevant in this case is that it allows athletes who haven't had the chance to qualify because of extraordinary circumstances.
And it's important to know that these are given to the specific athletes.
They're not given to the federations.
The IPC has invited these athletes to compete.
There's obviously been a massive story here at the Olympics where Russian athletes are competing as athletes neutral athletes that they're not competing under the flag, they can't wear the colours.
It does feel as if we are moving towards Russia and Belarus perhaps being reinstated.
That could come as soon as the LA games in two years time, the summer games.
The IPC have obviously moved first, so it'd be interesting to see whether that now piles pressure on the IOC going forward or whether the IPC will receive quite a lot of backlash for this.
This will draw the eyes onto the Paralympic Games.
You know, we're two weeks out now until it starts.
And I think everyone will be certainly looking towards to see what the reaction is from athletes that will be competing against these Russian and Belarusian athletes.
If there are any medals won for those countries.
Certainly the names that are doing the rounds of who the athletes could be.
They have Paralympic champions among them, world champions among them.
So the chances of seeing these athletes on the podium seems really quite high.
Katie Forkingham at the Winter Olympics.
To Sweden now, which is being rocked by a gruesome criminal case.
A man in his 60s is suspected of exploiting his wife to sell sex with her to more than 100 other men.
Stephanie Zachrisson reports.
In October of last year, a woman in northern Sweden contacted the police, accusing her husband of selling her to other men for sex.
The man was arrested and investigators have been trawling through phones, looking at text messages emails, bank transfers and videos.
First, police said a handful of men were alleged to have been involved.
Then it was 30, then 70.
Now they say it could be as many as 120 individuals from across Sweden.
Here's prosecutor Ida Annerstedt.
What I'm saying is that he has exploited this woman financially and it should be considered an aggravated crime on the basis of the large scale of it, the big financial gains he's made, and because he's used this woman in a particularly careless way.
Parts of the police investigation have now been made public, revealing details from some of the interviews with the woman.
She says the alleged facilitation has been going on for over three years.
And while prosecutors don't want to comment on whether she was drugged or otherwise indisposed, she says she has trouble remembering some of the days when this was all happening.
The revelations have caused uproar in Sweden, with police and criminologists labelling it a unique case.
This is Equalities Minister Nina Larsson.
These are shocking and horrific accounts.
It's a form of slavery.
Men should not be buying women's bodies.
It doesn't belong in society and it doesn't reflect the human values we want to have in Sweden.
Sweden's law on prostitution bans the buying of sex and the trafficking or facilitating of others for sex, but not the person selling, in this case the wife of the suspect.
The husband could face up to 10 years in prison if convicted.
He denies any wrongdoing.
The trial is expected to begin before Easter.
Several of the suspected sex buyers are also facing charges, but trials against them have been postponed as the investigation has grown.
Prosecutors say they will not be able to charge every sex buyer in the case, since it would take years to bring them all to justice.
Stephanie Zachrisson.
Finally, the Grammy-winning American songwriter Billy Steinberg has died at the age of 75.
He was a key figure behind a string of chart-topping hits, including Madonna's Like a Virgin.
Lisa Costello looks back at his career.
Alongside Tom Kelly, he wrote other classic 80s and 90s songs, including Whitney Houston's So Emotional, The Bangles' Eternal Flame, and Cyndi Lauper's True Colours.
MUSIC PLAYS
He helped write five US number one singles and won a Grammy for his work on the title track of Celine Dion's 1996 album Falling Into You.
I'm falling into you.
He went on to co-write songs in the early 2000s, such as Jojo's Too Little, Too Late and Demi Lovato's Give Your Heart a Break.
In 2011, when he was inducted into the Songwriters Hall of Fame, Billy Steinberg was described as one of the most successful songwriters, whose songs turned into enduring classics.
Paying tribute.
His family said he was a visionary lyricist who transformed deeply personal reflections into anthems in which millions found themselves.
So many good songs.
That was Lisa Costello.
And that's all from us for now.
If you want to get in touch, you can email us at globalpodcast at bbc.co.uk.
You can also find us on X at BBC World Service.
And don't forget our sister podcast, The Global Story.
This edition of the Global News Podcast was mixed by Mark Pickett.
The editor is Karen Martin.
I'm Charlotte Gallagher.
Until next time, goodbye.
