NPR.
This is The Indicator from Planet Money.
I'm Waylon Wong.
I'm Adrian Ma.
And coming over to The Indicator side of the street this week, one Mary Child.
Welcome.
Hi, hello.
Thank you for having me.
Do we have like crosswalks on Indicator Street?
Yes, it's very safe.
I would never jaywalk.
Safety first.
Mary, it is awesome to have you here.
And I don't have to tell you both.
You know what time it is, right?
Indicators of the Week time!
Whee!
That's right.
We have looked at interesting numbers in the news this week, and we are here to tell you all about them.
So on today's episode...
A lot of Americans are not too hot on capitalism these days.
The U.S. policies behind the Hyundai plant ice raids.
And one long family succession saga comes to an end.
What's in your wallet?
Terms apply.
See CapitalOne.com slash bank for details.
Capital One N.A., member FDIC.
This message comes from ServiceNow.
People should do the creative work they actually want to do, not boring, busy work.
Now, with AI agents built into the ServiceNow platform, you can automate millions of repetitive tasks in every corner of your business IT, HR and more.
So your people can focus on the work that they want to do.
That's putting AI agents to work for people.
It's your turn.
Get started at servicenow.com slash AI dash agents.
What happened in Iowa today?
Probably a lot.
Hey, I'm Megan McKinney.
It can take a while to follow all of the news, but it doesn't have to.
Have you tried Hear First?
It's a daily news podcast from Iowa Public Radio, part of the NPR network.
It's your quick stop for Iowa news, culture, and community.
Listen where you get your podcasts.
Indicators of the week.
Adrian, what's your indicator?
So my indicator comes from a Gallup poll released this week.
In this poll, Gallup asked about 1100 people whether they had a favorable or unfavorable view of capitalism.
Any guesses as to what percent of respondents say they have a favorable view of capitalism?
Hmm, 32.
Okay.
I'm going to go a little high.
I'm going to go 47.
Playing by the Price is Right rules, Waylon is the winner here because the actual answer is 54%.
Just over a majority of respondents said they have a favorable view of capitalism.
And that is my indicator this week.
So a majority of respondents say, you know, capitalism, I'm into it.
But 54 percent is actually a seven point decline from when Gallup first asked this question to people in 2010.
And before we declare capitalism on the skids.
The majority of people, the vast majority of people in this poll said they are in favor of small business and also free enterprise.
But as capitalism has been losing its luster in recent years, interestingly people's views of socialism has actually improved.
And we have about 39 percent of people in this poll saying they have a favorable view of socialism.
What does that compare to 2010?
Okay, so that compares to 36% back in 2010.
Okay.
So it's like a slight increase.
Socialism kind of holding strong.
Now, were they just asked, like, capitalism, what do you think?
Socialism, what do you think?
Or were these terms more defined?
So the question was phrased like this.
Off the top of your head, would you say.
You have a positive or negative image of each of the following.
And then they would put in the word.
Capitalism or socialism?
You would get a hundred different answers.
Maybe a lot of people could interpret this question different ways.
But one of the big takeaways, at least according to a Gallup analyst named Jeffrey Jones, is that overall there is a a decline in how warm people feel about capitalism and at least socialism kind of creeping up the ranks a little bit for Democrats, especially younger Democrats, thanks to politicians like AOC.
But this analyst also says that What's going on here might also be a shift in rising populist sentiment among Americans.
And that could be kind of dampening the capitalist fervor.
And finally he says just younger people in general seem less hostile to the idea of socialism than people from older generations.
And that even goes for young Republicans.
Oh, socialist Republicans.
I'm going to have to sit with that one.
Yeah, that's my political economic indicator.
Mary, you want to go next?
My number is 475.
That is about how many people were detained after a raid at a Hyundai plant in Georgia last week.
I read about this.
Yes, it was big news.
Many of those 475 were South Korean nationals.
So the ICE raid on the plant targeted workers who were in the country without the correct papers.
And many of them were there to build a battery manufacturing facility in a joint venture between Hyundai and LG.
So obviously, we've heard a lot about ICE rates lately, of course.
And we might be hearing more of this flavor, because the FT and the Journal both reported that there are a lot of other Korean facilities here in the US with similar visa issues.
And it's all because of this sort of absurd tension between two US policies.
So on the one hand, the US federal government is saying we want international investment in this country and we're coaxing other nations to pour resources onto our shores in exchange for, for example, lower tariff rates.
But then...
According to this reporting, the US government is just not supplying enough visas for the workers required to enable the actual projects to succeed.
I feel like the question here is then couldn't these companies hire Americans to fill these positions?
You might think so, but no, not really, because there just aren't enough workers.
I mean.
The unemployment rate right now is 43 but, more importantly, there aren't enough workers with these technical skills.
We just haven't been doing manufacturing here, so our workforce does not have the experience or the expertise in these areas.
So maybe domestic workers could get trained, but certainly not on the timelines that these projects mandate.
Are you saying that these projects have to get done really quickly?
Yes.
A lot of the companies have gotten government grants, which have mandatory deadlines.
And if those deadlines are not met, they could lose out on that money.
So, in order to get their projects up and running fast enough, apparently they were just cutting corners on visas.
So workers have been coming to the US to work on visas like, for example, the B-1 visa, which allows entry for business purposes but doesn't allow working for pay while here.
And apparently this has been an open secret for many years, but US authorities just were not enforcing anything.
And some of the news coverage I read said that maybe contractors were involved in doing the hiring right.
So it's a little bit like maybe the companies are saying oh, we worked through this intermediary and we don't know what they were doing.
Yeah.
This does...
Seemed to make things a little bit awkward between U.S. and South Korea.
Yes.
The raid just so happened right as the US and South Korea were nearing the finish line on a trade deal.
South Korea was going to create a 350 billion investment fund to spend in the US as part of the deal with the US.
And the U.S. would set tariff rates at 15% down from 25%.
This sounds like something that I don't know the administration might frame as like an art of the deal thing.
The latest news on this is that the Secretary of State, Marco Rubio, met with South Korean officials, and most of the South Korean nationals who were detained are flying home.
Thank you, Mary.
Super interesting to see how that is going to play out.
Last and the most.
I'm always the most.
The opposite of least.
Bring it home.
All right, so did you two catch the Succession series finale?
Obviously.
I did.
Also, it was two years ago.
Yes.
Loved it.
No, I'm actually not talking about the finale that aired on HBO.
I'm talking about the finale to the real-life Succession saga involving the Murdoch family, which actually was the inspiration for the Roy family.
In the TV series.
You know the Murdochs, the uber-wealthy family that owns Fox News, The Wall Street Journal, The New York Post, among others.
My indicator is $3.3 billion.
That is the size of a new deal announced this week that cements oldest son, Lachlan Murdoch, as the heir to the family empire.
So I guess, unlike the TV show with the Murdochs, it's actually the oldest son who gets the keys to the kingdom.
Exactly.
He did prevail.
Rupert and Lachlan Murdoch are essentially buying out three of Lachlan's siblings James, Prudence and Elizabeth.
They each get $1.1 billion.
And just to give you some background on this whole drama, under the terms of a trust created back in 1999, these four children were supposed to get joint control of the family business after the death of Rupert Murdoch, the patriarch.
But the kids aren't all ideologically aligned, so there's been a lot of tension since then.
Lachlan is considered more conservative and closer to his father than the other three.
Do you think he watched Succession and took notes?
He's like, OK, don't do that.
No big birthday party.
Didn't.
All bangers all the time on the birthday playlist.
Rupert Murdoch sued the other three, right?
Yeah.
I mean, talk about mess.
Rupert asked a court to change the terms of this trust to give Lachlan sole control of the family business.
And what's interesting is that the argument he used is that he basically said the company's value would be best preserved if Lachlan could run things without his siblings trying to.
You know, take the company in a more moderate direction.
Oh, interesting.
OK, so best for business means kind of maintaining Fox News's conservative political stance, right?
Yeah.
And Lachlan, you know, is the guy to do it.
And so now there's a new trust.
Lachlan's siblings will not get a say in how the company is run.
But you know what?
They are each a billion dollars richer.
I wonder how they feel about capitalism.
This episode was produced by Indra Carreras with engineering by Kwesi Lee.
It was fact-checked by Sarah Juarez and edited by Patty Hirsch.
Kicking Cannon is our show's editor and The Indicator is a production of NPR.
