This message is from NPR sponsor Total Wine and More.
This summer season, with so many bottles to choose from, it's easy to find your favorite and more.
Find what you love and love what you find, only at Total Wine and More.
Drink responsibly. Be 21.
covered in a membrane.
That allows us to develop outside of water, unlike say, a fish.
And that means we all have a common ancestor that branched out into other species — that researchers think probably lived over 300 million years ago.
And was probably similar to an amphibian, with some key differences.
But it already had some specializations, like a different skin, specialized lungs or brains, etc. Fernando Garcia Moreno is an evolutionary and developmental neurobiologist. He says for a long time, there's been a debate about how amniote brains, like birds and mammals, evolved—and what makes them similar.
One brain structure, called the pallium, has been seen as a comparable structure in birds, mammals and reptiles.
In every case, in all these pieces, the pallium is in charge of high tasks and high hierarchical tasks such as cognitive processing, sensorial processing, motor control, also language for instance in the case of mammals and birds.
In mammals, the structure is near the top of the brain.
It's sometimes called the cerebral cortex, and it includes an area called the neocortex, plus some other key structures.
The hippocampus, which is in charge of memory, for instance, memory processing, or the amygdala, which is in charge of emotional processing.
Birds and reptiles don't have a neocortex. So some scientists say mammal brains are totally unique, they must have evolved completely separately from birds and reptiles.
But other researchers say while birds and reptiles may not have a neocortex, they do have some of the same neurons, they're just in different places.
So, for some researchers, they thought that the same cell types appearing in the neocortex are located in a different manner, not in layers, but in nuclei, in birds for instance.
They tend to think this because all these neurons communicate each other in a quite similar fashion.
This side of the debate says maybe bird brains and mammal brains are more similar than they seem.
So Fernando and his lab try to figure out how these structures develop, and if that process could tell us anything about what makes our brains different from bird brains.
So today on the show, how does nature make a brain?
Why the phrase bird brains could be a misnomer and why humans may not be as special as we think.
I'm Regina Barber and you're listening to Shortwave, the science podcast from NPR.
Speaker 1 This message comes from Charles Schwab.
When it comes to managing your wealth, Schwab gives you more choices like full -service wealth management and advice when you need it.
You can also invest on your own and trade on thinkorswim.
Visit Schwab .com to learn more.
Speaker 2 Support for NPR and the following message come from Edward Jones.
What does it mean to live a rich life?
It means brave first leaps, tearful goodbyes, and everything in between.
With over 100 years of experience navigating the ups and downs of the market and of life, your Edward Jones financial advisor will be there to help you move ahead with confidence.
Because with all you've done to find your rich, they'll do all they can to help you keep enjoying it.
– Edward Jones, Member SIPC This message comes from Charles Schwab.
When it comes to managing your wealth, Schwab gives you more choices like full -service wealth management and advice when you need it.
You can also invest on your own and trade on think or swim.
Visit Schwab .com to learn more.
Okay, so Fernando, we're talking about how your study found that bird and mammal brains developed like through different processes.
And so, you're looking at these palliums of birds, reptiles, and mammals, and what did you find?
We found that the pallium of all these structures develops in the embryo following different rules.
So the areas in the brain in which these neurons are generated for the paleom or the timing in which these neurons are generated, it is strictly different when we compare reptiles to mammals or to birds.
Let's go back into like how this evolutionary structure happened like what what does the study show you?
Yeah. We cannot research the brain of these animals who are extinct for 300 million years.
But it allows us to hypothesize how the brain of these animals were.
And we think that it shows us how the brain of the last common ancestor was organized in terms of palaeoneurons and palaeocircuitries.
So we think that the same equivalent circuits that we see today in different areas of the paleo were present in the last common ancestor, not present in, for instance, in the case of amphibians, but they must be present in the last common ancestor because all amnio species, mammals, reptiles, and birds, evolved circuits from them.
Definitely, these were simpler circuits, much simpler than the ones that we can see today.
But within that the last common ancestor already had some of them in the paleo.
So what we see is that the circuit, it is very relevant, its features because it has been selected several times in evolution and we think that for people trying to research connectomics and also to make Artificial intelligence or neural artificial neural networks They should consider how this circuit acts because it is the most efficient and the optimal one selected by evolution.
So we should not Reinvent the wheel when nature is telling us this is the efficient circuit Wow.
And then we were talking about this idea of, these brains are different, but they're kind of doing similar things, this idea of convergent evolution.
So what is the process called convergent evolution?
Convergent evolution means that two features in two independent animals have evolved separately, but they have reached the same features.
It's same characteristics.
So the classic example is the wings of bats, butterflies and birds.
So when you research them you can see that they develop in a completely different fashion.
So bats are making the wings with their fingers whereas birds they're doing it with the whole arm, for instance, and insects they're doing it with some different primordia in the embryo.
So we know that they are convergent because if we go to the common ancestor to these three the animals.
It was kind of a worm that didn't have any wings and didn't have even limbs.
So we know that the wings of these species, they have evolved separately.
They are not inherited from a common ancestor.
But then we know that they are fulfilling the same function.
And therefore, they have a very similar structure.
Because to fly, you need a wing, which is in this fashion with a particular surface, particular thickness or weight.
So function, because it was common, you need to fly, dictated the shape of wings in all these pieces.
In the case of these circuits, we consider they evolved in a convergent manner, because although they follow different evolutionary routes, they ended up generating circuits which are very similar.
If your studies are kind of pointing towards the development of brains being convergent evolution.
Why is that significant to the understanding of how our brains work?
There is something quite relevant which is intelligence, for instance, or the high -guest sensorial processing, have appeared several times in evolution.
So we are not just an example of something very unique and special.
Intelligence is not such unique and special.
We think that complex brain and complex cognitive tasks have evolved separately several times because the circuits and the neurons in charge of them have evolved several times and separately.
So for instance, birds, some birds can count.
Yeah, and some birds can talk.
Some birds can use tools.
Yeah, exactly. And they are doing it with different parts of the pallium.
Of course the pallium is involved, but different parts of the pallium are in charge or making the sounds for instance, or the motor control of the larynx and the tongue, this kind of thing.
But the neurons and the areas of the pain are different.
So human intelligence or mammalian intelligence is not unique.
Other species evolved intelligence and complex cognitive tasks through other neurons and different neurons, and separately evolved.
Yeah. I mean, I find it fascinating.
You're basically saying that, like, even though bird brains are different, the neurons are in different places, they're doing different things, they developed in different ways, they can still do similar tasks.
Yeah. But you're saying they're doing that and their intelligence is not the same intelligence we have. We think so because they are using different structures and different types of neurons to be this kind of intelligence.
So bird brains are amazing.
A couple of examples.
So they have evolved to fly and therefore they have secondary And the most important in this case, and the pain in the neck for us in the lab, is that they have reduced enormously the size of neurons.
So they are tiny. In this way, they can reduce the size of the brain and the weight of the brain.
The whole brain and the whole body of birds is designed to weigh very low.
So they can fly. The neurons in vertebrates are tiny, and they are thoroughly compacted.
So these are the most dense, in terms of neurons, the most dense brains in nature.
But also when you compare the number of neurons, which always or classically was considered a correlation to intelligence, some birds, they have double the number of neurons of a primate of the same size.
So they have huge numbers of neurons.
Definitely. These are very clever animals and they are differently clever to us.
Mm -hmm. And I know that you didn't study humans, but I'm curious if you think like this research can tell us anything about whether there's something special about like the way the human brain developed.
I have to say that I am the least anthropocentric person in research biology.
You're like, boo, humans.
Yeah, definitely. So, I'm extending my low anthropocentric view.
I am also very low mamalo centric view.
So we, we see in the lab a lot of complexities in other brains.
So we also, we don't, I don't do research directly on human brains, right?
But I tend to think that in the last 25 years since I've been working in labs, there is a paper coming out every two, three years claiming that there is a specific feature to humans.
It could be a cell type which only appears in humans or circuits that is only developing in humans.
But then after three or four years, someone finds the same circuit or cell type or progenitor type in primates and then someone else find it five, ten years later in mice.
So in the end, me as the least anthropocentric researcher ever, I tend to I think that our brain is especially in quantitative features, but not in qualitative features.
So we are a mammalian brain.
Definitely this is different to a bird brain.
But we just have more of the same units.
And there might be an emergent property coming up from this increase in the number.
But with an eigen belief, someone has conveniently saw cell types which are specifically human or connections which are specifically human.
In the case of birds they can count and they can plan the future as you said they can you know they can make tools on their own.
They can hide some like some food for the future this kind of thing so they can plan.
But they are doing it with a different part of the pally.
Wow. What do you hope people will take away from your study?
Now, the main takeaway is that humans are special, but so are birds and reptiles.
So our brains are amazing, but bird brains are even as amazing at least. We have neurons other species do not have, but the chicken, even the chickens, stupid chicken.
They do have neurons that we don't have. So evolution has found so many different ways to generate complex brain, not just only one direct pathway from amphibians to humans.
In this case, the tree of intelligence is just a tree, is not just a single branch in the case of mammals.
Brenando, thank you so much for talking to us about bird brains.
Of course. Thank you.
This episode was produced by Rachel Carlson, edited by showrunner Rebecca Ramirez and Tyler Jones checked the facts.
Our audio engineer was Quacy Lee.
Beth Donovan is our senior director and Colin Campbell is our senior vice president of podcasting strategy.
I'm free perks Mint Mobile might be right for you with plans starting from 15 bucks a month.
Shop plans today at mintmobile .com.
up front payment of $45 for three month, 5 gigabyte plan required new customer offer for first three months only then full price plan options available taxes and fees extra see Mint Mobile for details.
Support for this NPR podcast comes from Zscaler reduce infrastructure costs by 90 % and improve networking and security agility by eliminating firewalls and VPNs with Zscaler Zero Trust plus AI.
Learn more at Zscaler .com slash security.
This message comes from Mint Mobile.
Mint Mobile took what's wrong with wireless and made it right.
They offer premium wireless plans for less, and all plans include high speed data, unlimited talk and text and nationwide coverage.
See for yourself at Mint Mobile dot com slash switch
