NPR. This is The Indicator from Planet Money.
I'm Darian Woods. And I'm Waylon Wong.
It is Jobs Friday. That means we have the latest numbers on the U .S.
labor market from the Bureau of Labor Statistics.
The jobs report shows that 151 ,000 jobs were added in February.
The unemployment rate nudged up to 4 .1 percent from 4 percent in January.
The monthly jobs report is one of the major economic indicators that we rely on the government to produce.
And generally, we trust that this data gives us an accurate snapshot of how U .S.
workers are doing. But recently, we've seen government data disappearing from public websites.
We've seen Doge getting access to sensitive information.
And in the past week, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick has disbanded two committees of outside experts that advise the government on economic data.
He also talked about changing how gross domestic product gets calculated.
And people like Erika Groschen are concerned.
Erika is a former commissioner of the Bureau of Labor Statistics.
She was also on one of the committees that Lutnick just nixed.
Erika says that statistical agencies live and die by trust.
Trust that the data is both secure and free from political interference.
If people don't trust the data, then you might as well not produce it.
And this data is vital to the economy.
The jobs report moves markets.
The Federal Reserve and other decision makers use the information to shape policy that affects all of us.
So today on the show, can we still trust official statistics like the monthly jobs report?
Erica talks about the safeguards that are in place and shares her worries about the future integrity of government data.
This message comes from Intuit TurboTax.
Now taxes is matching with an expert backed by tech to get you the most money back at TurboTax .com.
Experts only available with TurboTax live.
See guarantee details at TurboTax .com slash guarantees.
This message comes from Greenlight.
Ready to start talking to your kids about financial literacy?
Meet Greenlight, the debit card and money app that teaches kids and teens how to earn, save, spend wisely, and invest.
Start your risk -free trial at greenlight .com slash NPR.
Support for NPR and the following message come from Edward Jones.
What does it mean to be rich?
Is it having a million stories to share?
Is it having more time to give?
Edward Jones's financial advisors will support what matters to you.
Edward Jones, member SIPC.
This message comes from Capital One with the Capital One Saver Card.
Earn unlimited 3 % cash back on dining and entertainment.
Capital One. What's in your wallet?
Terms apply. Details at CapitalOne .com.
The jobs report comes from two surveys that the BLS conducts, and they are built on trust.
The people who answer the survey questions trust that their responses will be anonymized and used only for statistical purposes, and then the people who use that data, from policymakers to investors, trust the quality of that information.
Erica Groshen served as BLS Commissioner from 2013 to 2017.
She says the BLS and other statistical agencies have a whole litany of procedures to safeguard this trust.
It's built into the directives on how the statistical agencies operate.
It's built into the law.
It's built into this great publication called Principles and Practices for a Statistical Agency.
Sounds exciting. Oh, it's wonderful.
So it's front and present all the time, not because you're always fighting an active threat, but because everybody just knows that it's so important.
the same way that people lock the door at night and do other things to make sure that they're warding off threats.
Here are some examples of those safeguards in practice.
Erica says that when she was at the BLS, only staffers tasked with data analysis could be in the rooms where that work took place.
Even the janitors couldn't get into those rooms to empty the trash.
As commissioner, Erica would only see the jobs numbers when they were final.
She also learned early on in her tenure that the report had to be written in the most neutral terms, no spin allowed.
When I gave a talk, I would show the proverbial glass with some water in it and say, what's the BLS answer?
Is this half full or half empty?
What's your answer, Darian?
I know the exact answer to this.
The BLS wants to say there is 150 milliliters of water here.
Oh, exactly right, Darian, except, you know, Erica puts it in ounces.
Of course. This is an eight -ounce vessel containing four ounces of liquid.
So congrats, Darian.
You are qualified to write the monthly jobs report.
You know, the language is boring by design.
It's fine if the releases are boring.
What's not fine is if they have a political or policy slant to them.
Erika shared two big worries with us when it comes to the BLS and the integrity of the jobs data.
The first one is manipulation.
Basically, who gets access to the information and what they might do with it.
Erika says meddling could show up in different ways.
For example, someone in the government could change the public release schedule, either to bury bad news or announce good news at an opportunistic time.
If this happened, it would be a massive change in how the BLS currently operates.
The agency publishes a schedule of its data releases well in advance.
Everyone gets the numbers at the same time.
And this is important because the jobs report moves the stock market.
Hiccups in this process, even if they're not the result of malfeasance, make headlines.
Like last year, a BLS data release didn't happen as scheduled.
People from a couple investment banks then reportedly called the agency and got someone to tell them the numbers.
This had other people in the market crying foul that some people got the information early and could potentially trade on it.
The BLS said at the time that it was reviewing its procedures to make sure it wouldn't happen again.
Erica also flags another potential kind of manipulation, and that is changing how the BLS calculates the jobs numbers.
I worry about hubris, that some person who feels they're very smart may feel, gee, the BLS shouldn't be doing it that way.
They may have all their explanations for why they do it that way, but I'm smart and I think it should be done this way.
Oh, like I have a better formula for calculating the unemployment rate or something?
Exactly, right. Well, we've seen how the commerce secretary has his own idea about how to calculate GDP.
He wants to take government spending out of the equation.
Yeah, and we'll have an episode on that next week.
So between changing the release schedule or the equations, manipulation is one of Erika's big worries about the BLS.
Her second major concern is resources.
According to one estimate, the Bureau's budget has shrunk over 10 % since 2009 when adjusted for inflation.
And it takes a lot of resources, both money and people, to conduct the surveys that feed into the jobs report.
And I've got to think that BLS staffers are taking note of the big cuts to federal workers.
Yeah, fewer people makes the job of collecting and analyzing survey data harder.
And response rates for the surveys have already been declining.
That's a problem because smaller sample sizes could lead to lower quality data with more errors.
Data quality is also about what gets measured.
Elise Gould is a labor economist at the Economic Policy Institute.
It's a think tank that advocates for low - and middle -income working families.
It's also part of a lawsuit seeking to bar Doge from accessing systems at the Department of Labor, which oversees the BLS.
Elise recently went to look up government data on poverty levels by race, and the information was gone.
It later came back.
But Elise says that if the administration decides it no longer wants to track, say, unemployment rates by gender or race, that would be a blow to her work.
What I look for in the labor market is how is it affecting workers and their families?
And you want to know how that affects not just the average, but different groups of people.
Race and ethnicity and gender are very key indicators to know how people are doing in the economy.
And we think having that complete picture is very important to have evidence -based policymaking.
Both Erica and Elise say that they have faith in the staffers at the BLS, this group of dedicated data nerds who would raise the alarm about interference.
Erica says vigilance is part of BLS agency culture and the norms that underpin its work.
Still, those norms are vulnerable.
They can be undermined.
It's like what parents tell their kids.
Trust takes a long time to build up and it can be ruined in an instant.
This episode was produced by Angel Carreras and engineered by Gilly Moon.
It was fact -checked by Tyler Jones.
Kicking Cannon is our show's editor and The Indicator is a production of NPR.
This message comes from S &P Global.
S &P Global has private companies covered.
Learn how S &P Capital IQ Pro's extensive private company data can give you the insights you need to gain a competitive edge at smpglobal .com slash private company data.
Support for this program comes from Texas Mutual Insurance Company, a workers' comp provider dedicated to handling claims efficiently and compassionately.
Their specialized adjusters are trained to take policyholders through each step of the process, providing clarity and direction after an on -the -job accident.
By proactively working to support businesses from the time a claim is reported, Texas Mutual can help injured employees get back on the job and back to their lives.
Learn more at texasmutual .com slash claims.
This message comes from Warby Parker.
If you wear glasses, you know how hard it is to find the perfect pair.
But step into a Warby Parker store and you'll see it doesn't have to be.
Find a Warby Parker store near you at warbyparker .com slash retail.
