This BBC podcast is supported by ads outside the UK.
You ever feel that deep pull to the land to know it to build something that lasts that itch for your own wild country?
What ain't just a daydream in 2025?
It matters more than ever.
Whether you're a lifelong hunter or just starting out dreaming of land to explore to leave something real or there is a trailhead where you can start.
It's called land .com the biggest online network for rural property find the right agent and explore everything from timber tracks to ranches get the tools you need to buy that dream generational property stop dreaming about it and head to land .com it's your place to find your open space sanesta travel pass is the most rewarding way to travel sign up at sanesta .com for instant savings bonus points and perks like early check -in and across 13 brands and unlock their best rates when you book with Sonesta Travel Pass.
Here today, roam tomorrow.
Join now at Sonesta .com.
That's Sonesta .com.
Terms and conditions apply.
This is the Global News Podcast from the BBC World Service.
I'm Alex Ritson and in the early hours of Friday the 18th of July, These are our main stories.
What may have been Britain's biggest ever data breach was even worse than first feared.
It's now emerged the personal details of British spies and special forces were leaked.
Monsoon flooding in Pakistan kills at least 60 people in the last 24 hours.
Investors in Facebook's parent company Meta settle an $8 billion privacy lawsuit with its founder and other executives.
Also in this podcast, new plans to give 16 -year -olds the vote in UK general elections and… It's probably the most famous prop in the history of cinema.
The wooden sled from Orson Welles' Citizen Kane becomes the second most valuable movie prop ever sold.
Earlier this week we reported on a security breach here in Britain that's been described as one of the worst in the country's history.
The names of thousands of Afghans who'd worked with the UK forces and were trying to flee the Taliban were accidentally leaked by a military official in 2022.
But a special court order kept the news hidden from the public until now.
And as the veil of secrecy lifts, it's emerged that the leak was far worse than originally reported and included the details of British spies and Special Forces personnel.
Our correspondent Joel Gunter reports.
This was already a huge scandal.
On Tuesday, the country learned that the details of thousands of Afghans at risk from the Taliban had been accidentally leaked by someone in UK Special Forces headquarters and a secret scheme had been set up to bring them to the UK.
Now we can report that the data breach was much, much worse than previously thought.
It contained personal details of more than 100 British officials, including those whose identities are most closely guarded, members of Special Forces and spies.
The revelations began emerging when a rare super -injunction over the whole affair was lifted.
But the judge in the case issued a new injunction that prevented our reporting that British spies and Special Forces were involved.
That could only last so long, though.
In Parliament, the Defence Secretary John Healey revealed that British military and government officials were affected and details began to come out in newspapers not party to the court case.
Today, in an emergency hearing at the High Court, the Ministry of Defence relented.
Media organisations could report the most damning revelations, that officials with some of the most closely guarded identities in the country had been compromised.
Lord Beamish, the Chair of Parliament's Intelligence and Security Committee, expressed dismay.
I'm just astounded at this, is the idea that members of MI6 should be on this list. First question, why was this information being communicated on what we call the low side rather than high secure system?
And the other point is, is that we get quarterly reports from all the agencies and we have not heard anything about this breach at all.
And that question needs That's why.
Taken together, the leak of the personal information of both at -risk Afghans and British security personnel make this one of the worst security breaches in modern British history.
Joe Gunter. Our security correspondent Frank Gardner considers the potential consequences of this data breach. For a case officer in the Secret Intelligence Service, MI6, having your name and details outed in public is potentially a career killer For serving and former members of the equally secretive Special Air Service and Special Boat Service, such leaks can, in theory, expose them to the risk of deadly reprisals, given the lethal covert operations that some of them will have taken part in during their time with special forces.
So the new revelations about the data breach in 2022 are certainly shocking.
But the leak was belatedly discovered in August 2023.
That's given Britain's intelligence and special forces communities nearly two years to come up with ways to mitigate this disaster.
Amongst the worst -case scenarios that they will have had to consider is that Russia, China and Iran may also now be in possession of those leaked names.
But for now, those who have most to fear are the 600 former Afghan government soldiers soldiers and their estimated 1 ,800 relatives who are still in Afghanistan.
Whatever routes out were being suggested to them will have now been compromised.
The publicity surrounding this whole story will also inevitably re -energise some within the Taliban to hunt down those on the leaked list and exact what they perceive as rightful revenge against those who cooperated with British forces over a period of two decades.
Frank Gardner. More than 60 people have been killed in Pakistan's Punjab province in the past 24 hours because of heavy monsoon rains.
It's been one of the deadliest days of the rainy season in the country so far this year.
Our Pakistan correspondent Azadeh Moshiri has been visiting the city of Rawalpindi where a public holiday has been declared.
She told me why. The main reason for that was to encourage people to either evacuate or to stay home and stay in safety.
The situation is safer now.
But throughout the day, helicopters were rushing to find people who were either stranded on rooftops, and they were pulling them up to those helicopters with ropes, or there were people who were unfortunately being pulled away by some of the streaming currents.
And some people survived, others didn't.
And when you speak to people, there is real shock at the fact that across this one province in just a single day, more than 60 people were killed.
Yeah, how devastating have these floods been compared to what normally happens?
Well, Pakistan is no stranger to flooding.
It's no stranger to monsoon season.
In fact, it desperately needs monsoon season because Pakistan also goes through periods of very serious droughts.
And so farmers need them to replenish their water supplies.
But they carry very great risk.
Here, a lot of people were killed, most of them, in fact, officials say, because rooftops collapsed.
There are homes that are in poor condition, they're dilapidated is what officials have told us.
And so many people were crushed under the pressure of that.
Others were electrocuted, some people drowned.
This did cause general disruption, flights were cancelled, some were delayed, and motorways were shut.
And since late June, nearly 200 people have been killed since the start of this monsoon season.
But if you compare it to other seasons, Pakistan has suffered greatly from monsoons and people that you speak to still remember what happened three years ago when about 1 ,700 people were killed.
And so this doesn't approach that level of devastation.
But people are very concerned because the forecast is warning there should should be more floods and rainfall in the next few days.
Is global warming a factor in this?
Well, Pakistan is one of the most vulnerable countries to climate change.
And that's despite the fact it's got one of the lowest carbon footprints.
And scientists warn that climate change puts the country at risk of more frequent and extreme weather events like these.
So in that sense, yes, it does have a role in this.
And so when you speak to people, they do feel like there's inevitability in terms of what has been happening.
But despite that, a lot of their anger is also very much directed towards the government, especially when it comes to people who've suffered real loss.
Today in Raul Pindi, I met one man, Shaokat.
And he said rescuers were too late for his 16 -year -old son.
Bilal fell into a sewage stream that was overflowing today.
And Shaokat said he and his neighbours were the ones who had to pull the body out that rescuers had arrived too late.
And what he said simply was that he expects the government to do more.
He said, today I lost my child, but tomorrow it could be more children and other families could suffer.
A French appeals court has ordered the release of one of the country's longest serving prisoners, the pro -Palestinian Lebanese militant, George Ibrahim Abdallah.
He spent more than 40 years in custody despite numerous attempts by his lawyers to get him released.
The Israeli embassy in Paris said Abdullah was a terrorist who should spend his life behind bars.
Europe Regional editor Danny Eberhardt has more details.
Georges Ibrahim Abdullah founded a Marxist -Lebanese militant group that was mainly active in the 1980s.
Pro -Palestinian, it targeted Western and Israeli officials.
It was behind the killings in Paris of a US military attaché and an Israeli diplomat.
Abdullah was given a life sentence for involvement in those murders and the attempted murder of a US consul in France Now the French court has ruled he's no longer a threat to the public calling his lengthy spell behind bars disproportionate The US has consistently opposed his release as have French prosecutors who've argued that he's not changed his views They may yet try to block his release That's set for Friday next week on condition he leaves France for good Danny Eberhardt.
Mark Zuckerberg, the founder of Facebook and its parent company, Meta, has settled a lawsuit filed by his company's shareholders just one day after the case went to trial.
The agreement was announced just before Mr Zuckerberg and other senior executives were expected to testify about violations of user privacy.
Our tech correspondent, Lily Jamali, has been following the case.
It was an $8 billion case, and it was brought by shareholders a couple years ago after the Cambridge Analytica scandal broke in 2018.
So for people who don't quite remember the details there, that's where we saw the data of millions of Facebook users leaked through a third -party app.
And that data ended up in the hands of Cambridge Analytica, which is this now defunct political consulting firm that had worked with Donald Trump's campaign back in 2016, his successful first presidential campaign.
pain. Meta ended up paying millions and ultimately billions of dollars in fines stemming from privacy violations, including one to an entity called the Federal Trade Commission.
That's our top antitrust watchdog here in the United States.
It was a $5 billion record fine.
And shareholders said that the board of directors that's supposed to oversee executives like Mark Zuckerberg not not only failed in their duty to protect user privacy, but then by signing off on these huge fines, they were protecting executives.
So what does this settlement mean for Mr. Zuckerberg and the other Meta executives and the Meta shareholders?
This allows these executives and directors to avoid testifying under oath at trial.
These are some of the biggest names in Silicon Valley, not just Zuckerberg, but Sheryl Sandberg, who was his right hand at the company for a very long time.
And then there's this host of past and present board members, people like Peter Thiel, Reed Hastings, who's the co -founder of Netflix.
As you say, this was an $8 billion lawsuit.
We don't know the value of the settlement, but assuming money has changed hands, where is it coming from?
We're going to find out eventually just how much money these executives are paying out.
Oftentimes companies carry something called DNO insurance.
So there is this insurance policy that companies have. It's possible that Mark Zuckerberg will never pay a dime out of his pocket that that insurance will fully cover.
However, all of us in the press corps are very curious what that number is.
How much did Mark Zuckerberg and these other figures pay or agree to have the insurance pay, perhaps, in order to make this case go away?
We should know probably in just the next few weeks.
Lily Jamali. A prop central to one of the most famous opening scenes in cinema history has sold at auction for nearly $15 million.
It's the sled from the Orson Welles film Citizen Kane.
Professor J .D. Rhodes of Cambridge University writes about cinema and has just published a book on props.
Owen Bennett -Jones asked him why this sled is quite so valuable.
The film's entire mystery is constructed around the identity of something called Rosebud that we only realise in the very, very last moments of the film is the name of this sled.
It's one of the most celebrated films in the history of world cinema and American cinema in particular, but it's its entire mystery and it's a film that proceeds by peeling away one layer after another of the mystery of the identity of its central eponymous character, Citizen Kane.
That whole mystery hinges on the identity of this object, this prop called Rosebud.
I mean, I think one other prop fetched a larger sum, which was the Red Shoes in The Wizard of Oz.
Exactly. I mean, you could argue as to whether or not those are items of costume or actually props.
But in any case, one of the other most valuable props to have been sold on the auction is, of course, one of the several copies of the Maltese Falcon that were produced for that film's production.
production and that's another film that's that's a film that is named after its its central prop as well it's funny you should say that i was just thinking if i wanted to you know if i rustled up 15 million dollars wanted to buy a prop i i thought the maltese falcon would be quite a good one you know if you had limitless funds what would you be buying i mean immediately for some reason the knife and psycho comes to mind that's probably the wrong answer slightly grim uh yes well in your your book, what did you conclude about the role and importance of props?
I mean, cinema depends on many things.
But people always have to be doing things.
And they do things with things.
So part of the pleasure of narrative cinema is watching people go about their business.
And that business can't happen without objects, the objects that surround us, of course, in our everyday lives.
So the book, which I wrote with my friend and collaborator, Elena Gorfinkel at at King's College London, sort of takes this uncelebrated part of the film production process and puts it in close -up and looks at it in some detail.
Because part of the film production process that's been taken for granted throughout most of film history, and we thought it would be interesting to sort of look at what does film look say from the prop's eye view, from the bottom up.
I've always been rather impressed with the Rosebud story, so I was a bit disappointed to to see that Orson Welles, the director, as he got older, said it was rather corny.
I mean, the film is, in a sense, kind of hammily constructed around this central mystery, which is delivered with great portentousness and then pursued across the film by this investigative journalist. But I think the film productively and interestingly plays with the corniness of this central conceit and it sort of redeems itself from this potential excess of sentiment partly by the way in which it manages the mystery and the gratuitousness of the sled which we actually only see really twice in the film but we of course hear about it and are fascinated by its identity across the film's duration.
Hasn't the world gone mad paying 15 million dollars for a sledge?
I mean, there are other indications that the world has gone bad, but this is probably one of the leading minor indications.
But it's a testimony, I suppose, to the power that the history of cinema and that films have over us, and the way in which the objects, not just the bodies of the performers, but the objects that constitute cinematic mise -en -scene have over our memory of cinema, and also the way that they help us construct our own cultural memories or our experiences of being in the film.
the world. Professor J .D.
Rhodes. Still to come, the biggest transfer fee in women's football ever as Arsenal pay $1 .3 million for Canadian forward Olivia Smith.
It's a privilege and an honour.
Everything that they've accomplished is just so massive.
And for me to now be a part of that, I'm very excited.
You ever feel that deep pull to the land, to know it, to build something that lasts, that itch for your own wild country?
What ain't just a daydream?
In 2025, it matters more than ever.
Whether you're a lifelong hunter or just starting out, dreaming of land to explore, to leave something real, or there is a trailhead where you can start, it's called land .com.
The biggest online network for rural property.
Find the right agent and explore everything from timber tracks to ranches.
Get the tools you need to buy that dream generational property.
Stop dreaming about it and head to Land .com.
It's your place to find your open space.
Welcome to The W, where elite athletes are redefining the game of basketball.
From buzzer -beating shots, jaw -dropping defense, and logo threes, The WNBA delivers nonstop action and world -class talent every game.
These athletes don't just play the game, they elevate it.
The biggest stars, the brightest age.
AT &T WNBA All -Star 2025 comes to Indianapolis July 18th through 19th.
Tune into the game July 19th at 8 .30 p .m. Eastern time on ABC.
Travel smarter, not harder.
At America's Best Value -In by Sonesta.
With convenient locations from coast to coast And value packed comfort at every turn And when you're a CINESTA Travel Pass member Staying at America's best value in Means earning points toward free nights, upgrades and more Go to CINESTA .com to book your stay And unlock their best rates with CINESTA Travel Pass Here today, roam tomorrow Join now at CINESTA .com Terms and conditions apply Hi, I'm Cindy Crawford And I'm the founder of Meaningful Beauty When Dr. Sabah and I decided to do a skincare line together, he said to me, we are going to give women meaningful beauty.
And I said, that's exactly right.
We want to give women meaningful beauty, which means each and every product is meaningful.
It has a reason to exist. It's efficacious.
You're going to get results.
And then you just go out and live your life.
Meaningful beauty. Confidence is beautiful.
Learn more at MeaningfulBeauty .com.
The British government has confirmed plans to lower the voting age for UK general elections from 18 to 16.
16 and 17 -year -olds are already allowed to vote in elections for the devolved parliaments in Scotland and Wales.
The governing Labour Party made the promise before it came to power last year.
Ministers say the move will help restore trust and boost democratic engagement in a changing world.
The minister for democracy, Rishanara Ali, explained the government's reasoning.
This is a really important change.
This is a seismic change in terms of how our democracy works and giving young people a say in the future of our politics and our country.
Young people at the moment can work at the age of 16, pay taxes, join the army.
So there's no reason why they shouldn't have the right to vote from the age of 16.
These teenagers welcomed the lowering of the voting age.
I think that there's so much opportunity if young people become more involved in the political system.
I feel like more could be done to ensure that we know exactly what parties are about.
When you're 16, you can join the armed forces, you know, you can have a job, you can pay taxes, but it just seems not right that they don't have the right to vote.
Our UK political correspondent Rob Watson told Oliver Conway just why the government is doing this.
I can tell you their argument, and that is that it's all about modernising democracy, that as you said, you have 16 -year -olds voting in parts of the United Kingdom, in Scotland and Wales, and the government says, why on earth not in England?
And they point out that you can do things like pay taxes, get a job at 16, so why on earth shouldn't you be able to vote?
But I don't think there's any doubt that the broad idea is to recognise recognise that voter turnout is going down and that if there was anything you could do to reverse that, you should give it a try.
Of course, they've been criticised by the main opposition Conservative Party saying, well, they haven't fought this through very properly.
And how come you could be able to vote at 16, but you can't get married until you're 18 or fight in a war until you're 18.
So there's been some sniping from the sides, although I think it's not entirely clear if the Conservatives will actually oppose it.
Yeah. Is there any consensus about what impacts this will have on the way the whole population votes?
Well, yes, in the sense that opinion polling suggests that the younger you are, the more likely you are to vote on the left, right?
I mean, Oliver, that's the same pretty much in most countries in Western democracies.
But I think if anyone was really hoping that that this was going to sort of transform low voter turnout, that'd be cause for concern because turnout at the last election was 60 % of eligible voters, which was the lowest it had been in 20 years.
And you know what's going to come next, Oliver, which was the age group with the lowest turnout, 18 to 24 -year -olds.
So it's probably going to be an uphill struggle based on what's already out there, the evidence already out there.
But absolutely, I mean, in terms of if people do vote, Young people do vote.
Are they going to vote more on the left?
You betcha. Although there have been suggestions that say across Europe and perhaps in America, some younger people are actually turning rightwards now.
Yeah, there was some interesting polling done, which absolutely suggested that the biggest beneficiary of 16 year olds being given the vote would be Labour and also the Ecological Green Party.
But absolutely, the other big beneficiaries would be the anti -immigration and clearly right of centre, reform parties, so it wouldn't all be cream and votes for Labour and the left. Rob Watson.
There are a handful of countries that have already brought down the voting age to 16, including Brazil, Argentina and Austria.
So how successful has it been in Austria?
Karin Giannoni asked Julia Parthy -Müller, senior scientist at the University of Vienna's Centre for Electoral Research. It was introduced in 2007, so already 18 years ago.
And regarding the impact, we have recently evaluated quite comprehensively, and it was surprisingly limited.
So while the hope of the politicians introducing this reform was to boost turnout and foster long -term engagement among young voters, the results were somewhat modest. So the young voters, they vote at similar rates like the 18 -year -olds, but it didn't really boost turnout.
On the other hand, it also didn't have any negative impacts.
I wonder, did it make a difference between right and left?
Did the voting gravitate leftwards with a load of young people now voting for the first time?
No, so we observed surprisingly little impact, both with regard to turnout, but also with regard to political political extremity or voting patterns.
So overall, the young voters, they are also, of course, rather small cohort.
So it did not fundamentally transform the political landscape of Austria.
So as a result of it, we didn't find much change in either direction.
And I wonder, you know, it's been 18 years now since Austria introduced voting for 16 year olds.
Have you noticed a difference in political engagement?
Did that have any effect that that people are more politically active and continue to vote more consistently as they age?
Unfortunately, not really.
It wasn't that transformative as it was hoped initially.
While there was a bit of an indication that there was a bit of a boost in the first election, so maybe due to the novelty of the measure, in the long run, we didn't see so much of a difference.
But on the other hand, it is, of course, a good idea to have a very inclusive democracy and in that sense it may still be worthwhile to promote young people with this opportunity to be able to vote.
Julia Parthy -Müller.
A court in Poland has convicted three doctors of directly endangering a patient's life after a pregnant woman died from septic shock in a case that outraged abortion rights campaigners.
The woman, identified only as Isabella, was admitted to hospital in the 22nd week of pregnancy carrying a foetus with severe developmental defects.
Adam Easton reports from Warsaw.
Isabella's face has become a symbol of Polish women's fight for broader access to legal abortion.
Her death in 2021 caused street protests across the country.
Months before, a constitutional court ruling took effect banning abortions performed because of foetal defects, which before the ruling accounted for 98 % of legal pregnancy terminations.
Isabella's baby had been diagnosed with such malformations.
Her family say the ruling meant doctors at the hospital in the city of Pstina were afraid to intervene, contributing to her death.
An investigation found the court ruling did not affect the doctor's actions.
Adam Easton. A new transfer fee record has been set for women's football.
The deal, struck by the London -side Arsenal to buy Canadian forward Olivia Smith from Liverpool, is especially notable for UK newspaper headline writers as it makes her the first million -pound female player in the history of the game, that being about $1 .3 million.
It's also 46 years after the same milestone was reached in the men's game when Nottingham Forest signed Trevor Francis for a million pounds.
Our correspondent, Deleth Lloyd, who's at the Women's Euros in Switzerland, told me more about Olivia Smith.
She's still only 20, Olivia Smith.
She's a Canadian international.
She made a debut for Canada at just 15 years of age, and luckily for Arsenal, she's already had one season in the English Women's Super League under her belt.
She joined Liverpool a year ago from sporting in Portugal, where she perhaps first caught the eye in Europe as well.
She scored seven goals in 20 appearances last season.
She's very attacking as well, so I think she'll be an exciting addition to what is already a very exciting Arsenal side.
Remember, they won the Champions League title in May.
It's understood a number of clubs were chasing her, but Olivia Smith opted for Arsenal, saying it's her dream to compete for the biggest titles in England and Europe.
And it is a huge statement from the Gunners.
Yeah, what does this milestone say about the popularity of women's football?
Well, it clearly indicates, doesn't it, that the women's game continues to grow.
It has been for a number of years.
the women's game in England went professional in 2014 we know United States of America have long since led the way haven't they with the NWSL I think it was only a matter of time before we broke the £1 million barrier as well as recently as January we saw Chelsea of the WSL splash out £900 ,000 on the USA defender Naeemi Girma from San Diego Wave up until then it was Rachel Kundanangi from Zambia who was the world's most expensive footballer following her move to Bay FC a couple of years ago for £675 ,000.
It was only a matter of time for this to happen and I'm out in Switzerland, like you say, for the Women's Euros and it just continues to attract more people.
Many of the matches out here have been sell -outs.
I was at Italy against Norway last night on Wednesday night in Geneva.
More than 26 ,000 fans in attendance.
So, yes, it's on the up and up.
Briefly, will women ever be paid the same as men?
Perhaps not in mine or your lifetime, but I'd like to believe that one day it will be possible because we are hopefully getting there, even if it is slowly but surely.
Deleth Lloyd. The American singer Connie Francis, who had a string of hits in the late 1950s and early 1960s, has died aged 87.
She was the first woman to reach number one in the US.
Connie Francis had recently enjoyed a resurgence in popularity after one of her songs began trending on social media.
Our media and arts correspondent, David Sillitoe, looks back at her life.
It was in 1957 that Concerto Franquenero, a young singer from New Jersey, was on the verge of giving up.
She'd grown up being taken to talent shows by a father who was desperate to make her a star.
she had one record left on her contract my first nine records were bombs that added up to 18 songs that went nowhere I had one more session left on my contract one more shot at making it as usual my father was convinced he had the answer as usual I thought otherwise that song was Who's Sorry Now she had her hit the tunes that followed Stupid Cupid Stupid Cupid, Lipstick on Your Collar, and Vacation made her a star not just in America, but across the world.
This is Vacation in Japanese.
She was also a campaigner for the rights of victims of crime.
The consequences of a violent rape in 1974 and the murder of her brother had left deep scars.
In the 80s, I had 17 involuntary commitments in nine years in five states to mental institutions.
As the years passed, she returned to the stage and a new generation in recent months have discovered her music through TikTok.
Pretty little baby Lip -syncing to the song Pretty Little Baby brought her a viral hit, aged 87.
A career she feared might have been over before her 20th birthday had lasted more than 70 years David Sillitoe on the life of Connie Francis who's died at the age of 87 And that's all from us for now but there'll be a new edition of the Global News Podcast later if you want to comment on this podcast or the topics covered in it, you can send us an email.
The address is globalpodcast at bbc .co .uk.
You can also find us on X at BBC World Service.
Use the hashtag Global News Pod.
This edition was produced by Judy Frankel and Peter Goffin and mixed by Pat Sissons.
The editor is Karen Martin.
I'm Alex Ritson. Until next time, goodbye.
Thank you.
