#18 Naval Ravikant: The Angel Philosopher｜The Knowledge Project

Hey, it's Shane Parrish and welcome to a new episode of The Knowledge Project where we deconstruct actionable strategies that you can use to make better decisions, learn new things, and live a better life.

This time around we have the amazing Naval Ravikant.

Naval is the CEO and co -founder of AngelList.

He's invested in more than 100 companies including Uber, Twitter, Yammer, and so many others.

Don't worry, we're not going to talk about early stage investing.

Naval is an incredibly deep thinker who challenges the status quo on so many things.

He's thought deeply about stuff that's near and dear to us like reading, habits, decision making in life.

Just a heads up, this is the longest podcast I've ever done.

Our conversation lasted over two hours and if you're like me you're going to take a lot of notes.

A complete list of books and sites mentioned is available on the show notes at Farnham Street blog .com slash podcast.

A transcript is available for members of our Learning Tribe.

If you want to join head on over to Farnham Street blog .com slash Tribe.

In addition to transcripts, we have the world's best online reading group and a host of other goodies.

Without further ado, here's Naval.

Naval, welcome to the show.

I am so excited to get to talk to you today and ask you a whole bunch of questions that I have on my mind.

Oh, thanks for having me.

I'm excited to be here.

I've been a longtime fan of your work.

Thank you. Let's get started with something simple.

Can you tell me a little bit about what you do?

It's actually not that simple.

I have a hard time saying what I do.

My day job is that I am CEO of Angel List, the company that I started almost seven years ago now.

Angel List is this platform for startups in the tech industry and we help entrepreneurs raise money.

We help entrepreneurs recruit talent into their startups and we also help people find jobs into startups and now recently we acquired product hunt so we also help companies launch to customers.

It's basically a one -stop shop for the early stage tech ecosystem, whether you're raising money or you're investing money with the largest online platform for that, whether you're recruiting talent or whether you're being recruited with the largest online platform for startup recruiting and then whether you're

looking for a new product to try out or whether you're looking for customers for your product, we're also the largest online product platform for launching that.

It's become this bigger thing and that's my day job but I'm also involved in a bunch of other things.

I'm an investor personally in about 200 companies, advisor to a bunch.

I want a bunch of boards.

I occasionally blog and tweet.

I'm also a small partner in a cryptocurrency fund because I'm really into these coins like Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Zcash and so forth.

I'm always cooking up something new.

I always have a bunch of side projects that I forget.

How do you keep track of that all?

What does your typical day look like?

Well, that's the good part.

I don't have a typical day nor do I want a typical day.

If there is a typical day, I'm usually inside my office at AngelList but I'm basically just operating mostly on email or phone or meetings or scrolled up at home.

There are days where I just work completely from home.

There are days that I don't work.

I'm actually even trying to get rid of this concept of having to be the specific place at a specific time.

All I care about is, am I doing what I want to do and am I being productive and am I happy.

I really want to break away from this idea of 40 hour weeks or 60 hour weeks or 80 hour weeks or 9 to 5 or roles or jobs or identities.

It just all feels like a straight jacket.

You're one of the most voracious readers I know.

You've called yourself a conscious bookworm and you've read a ton.

How did you first get interested in reading?

Reading was my first love.

I know that in my childhood when I was around 9, 10, 11 years old, I was a last key kid.

My mom was working multiple jobs and then she was going to school at night.

We were raised by a single mother.

My brother and I were in New York City.

We were in a part of New York City that has been very safe.

Basically the library was my after school center.

So after I come back from school, I just go straight to the library and I just hang out there until they closed and then I'd come home.

So that was just my daily routine.

But I think even by that point in time, I had already loved books.

I was reading books with a child.

I remember my grandparents' house in India.

I'd be a little kid on the floor going through all of my grandfather's Reader's Digest, which is just all he had to read there.

I mean, now, of course, there's a smorgasbord of information out there.

Everybody can read anything all the time, but back then it was much more limited.

So I would read comic books.

I would read Reader's Digest.

I would read storybooks, you know, whatever I could get my hands on mysteries.

I was big into mysteries.

So I think I just always love to read because I'm actually an anti -social introvert and I was just lost in the world of words and ideas from an early age.

I think some of it comes from the happy circumstance that when I was young, nobody forced me on what to read.

I think there's a tendency among parents and teachers to say, Oh, you should read this, but don't read that.

The reality is, I just read a lot that by today's standards would be considered mental junk food.

But eventually you just get to like reading.

You run out of the junk food and then you start eating the healthy food, right?

Or your tastes kind of gradually.

So I think to some extent that's what happened with me because I started from comic books and then run from that into mysteries and went from that into fantasy.

You got into sci -fi and then from sci -fi made into science and then mathematics and then philosophy.

So it just kind of kept climbing up the stack.

But I'm lucky that there was no one around when I was seven years old or six years old saying, Oh, you shouldn't read that you should read this instead.

Is most of what you read today physical or on a computer Kindle?

For convenience, it's mostly Kindle.

It's not the Kindle device.

It sucks in an iPad and but for books that I really really like I will also buy a physical copy.

So I have both so there's no excuse not to read it, you know a really good book cost 10 or $20 and you can change your life in a meaningful way.

So it's not something I believe in saving money on and this is even back when I was broken.

I had no money. I always spend money on books.

I never viewed that as an expense.

That's an investment to me and I probably spend 10 times as much money on books as I actually get through.

So in other words, like for every $200 worth of books that buy actually end up making it through 10%.

So I'll read $20 worth of books.

But it's still absolutely worth it.

You and I have that in common.

Yeah, and anything that's one of the greats like if I read a book and I know that it's amazing.

I'll buy multiple copies partially the giveaway partially because I have the money around the house and these days.

I find myself rereading as much or more as I do reading because I think this was a tweet from an account on Twitter.

That I saw this guy ill assertus and he basically said, you know, I don't want to read everything.

I just want to read the 100 great books over and over again and I think there's a lot to that.

So it's really more about identifying what are the great books to you because different books speak to different people and then really absorbing those because I don't know about you.

But I don't I have very poor attention.

I have to, you know, I skim, I speed read, I jump around and I could not tell you specific passages or quotes from books.

But but at some deep level, you do absorb them and they become part of the threads of the tapestry of your psyche.

So they do kind of weave in there.

There are there are books that I'm sure you've had this feeling where you pick up a book, you start reading it like, oh, this is pretty interesting.

This is pretty good.

And you're getting this increasing sense of deja vu and then about two thirds or halfway through the book you realize over in this book before.

And that's perfectly fine.

It means you were ready to read it.

What are the books you're reading now?

Good question. I'll pull up my Kindle app as we talk, but usually I'm always rereading some books in science.

Like I just read, I read seven brief lessons in physics.

I think that was the name of it.

I read that one at least twice.

I'm reading Sapiens again.

I love that book so much.

I'm pretty much always reading, rereading something by either Jadu Krishna or Murthy or Osho.

Those are kind of my favorite philosophers.

I'm reading a book on Renee Girard's Mimetic Theory.

It's more of an overview book because I couldn't make it through his actual writings.

I'm reading Tools of Titans, Tim Ferriss' summary book of what he's learned from a lot of gay performers.

I'm rereading Stories of Your Life and Others by Ted Chiang.

It's one of my favorite sci -fi novels.

I'm reading a book called Thermo Info Complexity.

It's actually by a friend of mine.

It's not published yet.

I just finished reading Presuasion.

I'll have to say I finished giving Presuasion.

Robert Khaledidi. I don't think I needed to read the entire book to get the point, but it was still good to read it, to read what I did.

I recently reread The Lessons of History by William Ariel Durand.

It's a great little history book.

I am currently reading Story of Philosophy also by Will Durand.

I have a young kid now, so I've got a lot of child -raising books that I use more as reference materials than anything else.

I recently read some Emerson, some Chesterfield.

Let's see, I've got a Leo Tolstoy book here.

I've got another Osho book.

I've got Delusion Damage, this is a blog that I used to love.

I have pieces of it saved up.

Alan Watts. Let's see, Scott Adams.

I reread God's Debris recently.

David H. Chiang, a friend of mine, is rereading it, so I picked it up again.

There's tons. I'm going to just go on and on.

There's a von Mises book here.

There's The Undercover Economist, the Richard Bach book.

There's some Jed McKenna books.

I was recently trying to reread Moby Dick and Hamlet, just to try and get back into fiction, but I didn't make it through either one.

Do you set aside time in your day to reread, or like to read it all, or is it like a consistent thing, or do you fit it in when you have time?

I read what I'm bored of everything else, but the good news is I get bored very easily.

So there's always a book to capture the imagination.

Usually at night time before I go to bed, I'll read, but it's not a flawless thing.

When I'm on vacation, I'll read, but if I'm sitting in the lift or an Uber, I'll read.

Sometimes in the morning at home, after I've worked out, I'll just read.

Sometimes when I wake up, I'll just grab my phone and read.

I'm not a very disciplined person, so I don't really set these hard and fast rules for myself.

But the good news is I just love to read, because I love to read.

Whenever I'm bored, and I have time, I just do it.

And thanks to the iPhone, and the Kindle, and the iPad, they just make it really easy.

Oh, I've got two books here in Feynman, Perfectly Reasonable Deviation, which is by him, and then Genius, which is a James Clack book about Feynman.

So this is where we're talking.

I'm flipping through them, looking for Evolution of Everything by Matt Ridley, one of my favorite authors.

I've read everything of his, little Dale Carnegie in here, the Three Body Problem, Man's Search for Meaning.

There's lots of sex at dawn.

There's a lot of books out there.

Your Kindle sounds like my dream.

Well, I'm going through right now, it's hundreds and hundreds and hundreds of books, or double it, it's not even much.

I mean, we could sit here the entire podcast, not even like people.

You've said before, you think of books as throwaways.

How did you come to think about books like that, and what impact does that have on what you read?

I mean, that's really an impact of the internet.

Once the internet came along, I think it's destroyed everybody's attention span, because now all of humanity's works are available to you at any given time, and you're being interrupted constantly.

So just our attention span goes down, our bit of focus goes down.

But at the same time, we just become more judicious.

We also want, we want the meat.

And the problem with books is that to write a book, to publish it, publish a physical dead tree book, just takes a lot of work and effort and money.

So sometimes people start putting long, wrapping long books around simple ideas.

Those are probably my least favorite books.

It's kind of why I avoid the whole business and self -help category, because you generally have one good idea and it's buried in hundreds or thousands of pages and lots of anecdotes.

So what happened was I just noticed that sometime in the late 90s, I stopped reading as much as I used to, and I started reading more blogs.

I started reading less books than more blogs, and great blogs like Farnham Street, Kevin Simler's blog, Melting Asphalt, and so on.

You get incredibly smart people digestifying, simplifying, and writing these great things, but it's only a page or two or three pages.

So I got really into blogs.

But then I stopped reading books, and a lot of the oldest wisdom is actually in books.

And with books, you're now talking about the combined works of all of humanity as opposed to just who happens to be blogging right now.

So I realized I missed that.

And then with the Kindle and iBooks coming along, that allowed me to start treating books like I treat blogs, which is when I go to a blog, I'll actually skim through lots of articles until I find one that looks really interesting, and they'll read that whole article all the way through and maybe take

notes. So now I treat books the same way, which is I'll skim through a large number of books, I'll put them down, I'll jump around back, forward, middle, until I find a part that's interesting and then I'll just consume that piece.

And I won't feel guilty about having to finish the entire book, because I just view it as a blog archive, right?

It's like a blog might have 300 posts on it.

And you can read just the 235 that you need right now.

And I think you can think of a book the same way.

And then that opens the world and web of books back open to us instead of it being buried somewhere.

I think, you know, like many people, I know of a lot of friends who are currently stuck on a book somewhere.

And if you ask people if they read, everybody says they read, everybody says they're reading a book, they can answer which book they're reading.

The reality is very few people actually read and actually finish books.

And I think that's probably because of all these societal and personal rules that we've put up, like you must finish a book and you must read books that are good for you and you can't read junk food books.

And this is a hot book right now and so on.

The reality is I don't actually read that much compared to what people think.

I probably read one to two hours a day, and that puts me in the top 0 .00001 percent.

I think that alone accounts for any material success that I've had in my life and the intelligence that I might have because real people don't read an hour a day.

Real people, I think, read a minute a day or less.

So making an actual habit is the most important thing.

And how you make it a habit doesn't matter.

It's very much like exercise or working out.

Do something every day.

It almost doesn't matter what you do.

So the people who are obsessing over like, should I be weight training or should I be doing tennis or should I be doing Pilates or should I be doing the high -intensity training method versus the happy body versus whatever?

They're missing the point.

The important thing is to do something every day.

It doesn't matter what it is.

So the same way I would argue, the important thing is to read every day.

And it's not, it doesn't matter.

It almost doesn't matter what you read because eventually you'll read enough things and your interest will lead you there that will dramatically improve your life.

So just like the best workout for you is the one that you're excited enough to do every day, the same way I would say the best books to read are the ones that are books or blogs or Twitter or whatever.

Anything with ideas and information and learning.

The best ones to read are the ones that you're excited about reading all the time.

This is the people that I know that read quite a bit.

They have a reading habit like you.

You're described as a very habitual person.

Where did that come from?

That might have come from the Tim Ferriss podcast.

I don't think I'm more habitual than anybody else.

I think human beings are entirely creatures of habit.

You know, as a young children are born with no habit loops, they're essentially born as blank slates and then they habituate themselves to things and they learn patterns and they get conditioned and they use that to get through everyday life.

And habits are good.

You know, habits can allow you to background process certain things so that your neocortex, your frontal lobe stays available to solve brand new problems.

But we also unconsciously pick up habits in the background and we keep them for decades and we may not realize that they're bad for us.

So we're ready to move on from them to some extent.

You know our attitude in life, our mood, our happiness levels, depression levels.

These are also habits.

Do we judge people?

How often do we eat?

What kinds of food do we eat?

Do we walk or do we sit?

Do we move? Do we exercise?

Do we read? These are habits as well.

And you absolutely need habits to function.

You cannot solve every problem in life as if it's the first time it's thrown at you.

But what we do is we accumulate all these habits.

We put them in the bundle of identity, ego, ourselves and then we get attached to that.

I'm Shane. This is the way I am.

I'm Nivell. This is the way I am.

And it's really important to be able to uncondition yourself, to be able to take your habits apart and say, okay, well that's a habit that I probably picked up from when I was a toddler and I was trying to get my parents' attention.

And now I've just reinforced it and reinforced it and reinforced it and I call it part of my identity.

But is it serving me anymore?

Is it making me happier?

Is it making me healthier?

Is it making me accomplish whatever I want to set out to accomplish right now?

So I don't think I'm anymore.

In fact, I would argue I'm less habitual than most people.

Like I don't like the structure my day.

But to the extent that I do have habits, I'm trying to make them more deliberate rather than accidents of history.

So what's a habit that you're trying to change right now?

What are you working on?

Well, I did a lot of habit changes the last few years.

So I've now got a daily workout that I do, which is a great habit.

I cut down heavily on drinking.

It's not fully eliminated, but it's mostly gone.

I drop caffeine. I'm not on a paleo diet, although I like to be.

So I'm on a variation of it that I call the paleo diet, which is I try to be paleo, but I failed constantly but I don't beat myself up over it because I feel that even approximating towards it is better than where I have been historically.

So, you know, like that, I tried to build a meditation habit, but I failed.

But I have made a habit of being meditative.

So I've gone through lots of habits.

Probably the one that I'm currently would like to cultivate is doing yoga more regularly.

But I haven't really.

I haven't formulated a plan around that.

And by the way, I reject a lot of the stuff that's being peddled around today about how you form and break habits.

I know there's this very popular book, one that I even recommended, which talks about the science behind habit.

And one of its depression conclusions, I think this came out of Stanford but that you can't break habits.

You can only replace them.

And that's BS. I've definitely broken habits completely.

And so I think you can uncondition yourself.

You can untrain yourself.

It's just hard. So it just takes work.

It takes effort. And usually the big habit changes come when there are strong desire motivators attached to them.

So, you know, the yoga one I'm going to work on, I don't yet have a great plan on that one.

I haven't tackled that one properly yet.

A big habit that I'm working on, which is going to be really hard to explain in any way that any normal human being will understand this, but I'm trying to turn off my monkey mind.

I think we are, when we're born as children, we're pretty blank slits.

We're living very much in the moment.

And we're essentially just reacting to our environment through our instincts.

And we're living in what I would call the real world.

And then when puberty comes along, that's the onset of desire.

It's the first time you really really want something and you start long -range planning for it.

And then because of that, you start thinking a lot and you start building an identity and ego to go and get what you want.

And this is all normal and healthy.

It's part of being the human animal, but I think at some point it gets out of control.

And then we are constantly just talking to ourselves in our heads.

We're playing little movies in our heads, walking down the street, but no one's actually there.

Now, of course, you started voicing this thought in your head that you're always having.

You'd be a madman and they'd lock you up.

But the reality is if you walk down the street and there are thousand people in the street, I think all thousand are talking to themselves in their head at any given point.

They're constantly judging everything that they see.

They're playing back movies of things that happened to them yesterday.

They're living in fantasy worlds of what's going to happen tomorrow.

And they're just pulled out of base reality.

And that can be good when you're doing long -range planning.

You can be good when you're solving problems.

It's good for the survival and replication machines that we are.

But I think it's actually very bad for your happiness.

And so in my mind, the mind should be a servant or tool, my master.

It's not something that should be controlling me and driving me 24 -7.

So I've taken on this idea that I want to break the habit of uncontrolled thinking, which is hard because if I say to you, don't think of a pink elephant, I just put a pink elephant in your head.

So it's an almost impossible problem.

So it's more something that has to be guided by feel than guided by actual thinking or thought process.

But I'm deliberately cultivating experiences, states of mind, locations, activities that will help me get out of my mind.

And I know, you know, all of society does that to some extent.

In some sense, the people chasing thrills and action sports or flow states or orgasm or any of these states that people really strive to get to a lot of these are basically just trying to get out of your own head.

They're trying to get away from that voice in your head and this overdeveloped sense of self.

And at the very least, I do not want my sense of self to continue to develop and become stronger as I get older.

I want it to be weaker and more muted so that I can live much more in present, everyday reality and accept nature and the world for what it is and appreciate it very much in the childhood and then not have to seek happiness through external circumstances chasing to fit some preconceived notion that I

have. Wow, there's a lot there I want to ask questions on.

Is there a tough one?

That'll take years.

That's not a six month habit.

That's a 10 year habit.

Do you think there's a difference between turning off versus suppressing your monkey mind?

Absolutely. Yeah, suppression doesn't work because when you try to suppress, that's the mind suppressing the mind.

That's just you playing games with yourself.

So I think it's a very hard problem.

And I want to go back to kind of unconditioning.

You basically stopped drinking alcohol.

How did how did you work on deprogramming yourself from from the social settings and environments that you're in where alcohol is probably available all the time?

And what benefits have you seen as a result of like, are you isolating these habits when you're changing them?

So you know, oh, I sleep better because I'm not.

Yeah, you know, the the the alcohol one is an interesting case study because the alcohol habit came from two things.

One was availability, just being in situations where alcohol is available and accepted in something you're supposed to do.

And then the second is the the desire.

Right. You want to do it because you're trying to accomplish something else.

So when I unpack that, I realize a couple of things.

The availability came from I'm just out.

If I'm out at night in an environment where alcohol is being served, that's the availability.

So if you want to avoid that, stay in.

Now staying in is not fun.

So what do you do? Well, I started this daily workout regimen in the mornings.

If you're working out in the mornings, then you can't stay up too late at night.

You can't stay up too late at night.

You can't be drinking too much.

You screw up a few times and your morning workout is terrible.

You have a headache.

You feel bad. You don't feel as as and when you're working out every day, you can checkpoint yourself very easily.

Like, oh, well, this exact thing that I do every single morning is suddenly harder.

So therefore, I'm weakened from the alcohol from last night.

So the morning workout checkpoint really helped me understand the consequences of consuming alcohol before.

And then the more interesting question is, well, why am I doing it?

And that's basically boils down to I was doing it to survive longer in social environment that I wasn't particularly happy in.

I essentially had to stun my brain into submission.

So there are better ways to do that.

One of those is only associated with people where you don't have to drink to be around them.

And that really narrowed my friend circle and narrowed the kinds of events that I go to.

There's a little bit of a substitution effect.

And some of what the substitution effect was I was drinking so that I wouldn't be thinking because and so what I went back to is like, well, can I cultivate these states of not thinking too much and if I can get there another way, then that will take away some of the urge to drink.

And then there's some substitution, for example, a switch from hard alcohol to red wine and red wine is inherently self -limiting.

You know, you have two cocktails.

The next thing you want is not a cocktail.

You have two glasses of red wine, at least for me.

I usually have a headache, so I'm done at that point.

It's very self -limiting.

But some of it is just a function of age.

I mean, I'm 43 now.

I don't think I can make it through a single glass of wine without having some negative consequence build up.

I still drink. I don't believe in the words like never and always because I think that's a way of limiting yourself and self -discipline yourself makes you less free and less happy at some level.

But I just want to be naturally in a position where I don't need it and I don't desire it.

And so that's kind of what I've been working more on.

What habit would you say most positively impacts your life?

I think it's the daily morning workout.

That has been a complete game changer.

It's made me feel healthier, younger.

It's made me not go out late and it came from one simple thing, which is everybody says, I don't have time, right?

Basically, whenever you throw any so -called good habit at somebody, they'll have any excuse for themselves.

And usually the most common is I don't have time and I don't have time.

It's just another way of saying it's not a priority.

So what you really have to do is to say, is it a priority or not?

And if something is your number one priority, then you will get it.

That's just the way life works.

But if you've got a fuzzy basket of 10 or 15 different priorities, you're going to end up getting none of them.

So what I did there was I basically just said my number one priority in life above my happiness, above my family, above my work is my own health.

And it starts with my physical health and then second is my mental health and then third, is my spiritual health and then it's my family's health.

Then it's my family's well -being.

And then after that, I can go out and do whatever I need to do to the rest of the world.

So it's a series of concentric circles starting out for me.

And so because my physical health became my number one priority, then I could never say I don't have time.

So in the morning, I just work out.

And however long it takes is how long it takes.

And I do not start my day and I don't care if the world is imploding and melting down.

You can wait another 30 minutes until I'm done working out.

And do you take any breaks from that or is that every day?

It's pretty much every day.

There are a few days where I've had to take a break because I'm traveling or I'm injured or sick or something.

But I can count on one hand the number of breaks I take every year.

You mentioned happiness being one of your top priorities.

What is happiness to you?

Like what does that mean?

What does that word mean?

Can you unpack that?

Yeah, it's a very evolving thing.

I think like all the great questions, you know, when you're a little kid and you go to your mom and you say, what happens when we die?

Is there Santa Claus?

Is there a God? Should I be happy?

You know, who should I marry?

Those kinds of things.

There are no glib answers to that because there are no answers that apply to everybody.

So these questions, the search for truth, you know, these kinds of questions, they ultimately do have answers but they have personal answers.

So the answer that works for me is going to be nonsense to you and vice versa.

So whatever happiness means to me, it means something different to you and it means something different to the listener.

But I think it's very important to explore what it is.

And for some people, I know it's a flow state for some people's satisfaction.

For some people, it's a feeling of contentment.

The best, my definition keeps evolving.

So the answer I would have given you a year ago would be different than what I tell you now.

But today, I believe that happiness is, it's really a default state.

It's what's there when you remove the sense that something is missing in your life.

And we are highly judgmental survival and replication machines.

We're constantly walking around thinking I need this, I need that trapped in the web of desires and happiness is that state when nothing is missing.

And when nothing is missing, your mind shuts down and your mind stops running into the future or running into the past to regret something or to plan something.

And then in that absence for a moment, you have internal silence and when you have internal silence, then you are content and you're happy.

I think people believe mistakenly, feel free to disagree because again, it's different for everybody.

But people believe mistakenly that happiness is about positive thoughts and positive actions.

But the more I've read, the more I've learned, the more I've experienced because I verify this for myself, every positive thought essentially holds within a negative thought.

Is a contrast of something negative.

The Tao Te Ching says it's more articulate than I ever could, but it's all duality and polarity.

So if I say I'm happy, that means that I was sad at some point.

If I say he's attractive, then that means that somebody else is unattractive.

So every positive thought even has a seed of a negative thought within it and vice versa, which is why a lot of greatness in life comes out of suffering.

You have to view the negative before you can aspire to and then appreciate the positive.

So all that said, long -winded to me, happiness is not about positive thoughts.

It's not about negative thoughts.

It's about the absence of desire, especially the absence of desire for external things.

And so the fewer desires I can have, the happier I can or the more I can accept the current state of things, the less my mind is moving because the mind really exists in motion towards the future of the past.

The more present I am, the happier and more content I will be.

But if I latch on to that, if I say, oh, I'm happy now and I want to stay happy, then I'm going to drop out of that happiness because now suddenly the mind is moving, is trying to attach to something, is trying to create a permanent situation out of a temporary situation.

So happiness to me is mainly not suffering, not desiring, not thinking too much about the future of the past, really embracing the present moment and the reality of what is the way it is.

Because nature has no concept of happiness or unhappiness to a tree.

There is no right or wrong.

There is no good or bad.

You know, nature follows unbroken mathematical laws and a chain of cause and effect from the Big Bang to now and everything is perfect exactly the way it is.

It's only in our particular minds that we're unhappy.

You're not happy and things are perfect or imperfect because of what we desire.

But I think I've also come to believe in the complete and utter insignificance of the self.

And I think that helps a lot.

Like, for example, if you thought you were the most important thing in the universe, then you have to bend the entire universe to your will, because if you're the most important thing in the universe, then how could it not conform to your desires?

And if it doesn't conform to your desires, something's wrong.

However, if you view yourself as a temporary material or an amoeba, or if you view all of your works as riding on water or building castles in the sand, then you have no expectation from how life should actually be.

Life is just the way it is.

And then you sort of accept that and you have no cause to be happy or unhappy.

Those things almost don't apply.

And what you're left with in that neutral state is not neutrality.

I think people think, oh, that would be a very bland existence.

No, this is the existence that little children live.

And if you look at little children on balance, they're generally pretty happy because they're really immersed into the environment in the moment without any thought of how it should be given their personal preferences and desires.

So I think the neutral state is actually a perfection state and one can be very happy as long as one isn't too caught up in their own heads.

What is your internal monologue go like when you find yourself trying to attach to something by default?

Yeah, I try to keep an eye on my internal monologue.

It doesn't always work.

But in the computer programming sense, I try to run my brain in debugging mode as much as possible.

And when I'm talking to someone like I'm talking to you right now or when I'm engaged in a group activity, it's almost impossible because your brain has too many things to handle.

But if I'm by myself, like just this morning, you know, I'm brushing my teeth and I start thinking forward to the podcast and I started going through this little fantasy where I imagine you asking me a bunch of questions and I was fantasy answering them.

And then I caught myself, I put my brain in debug mode and just watch every little instruction go by and I said, why am I fantasy future planning?

Why can't I just stand here and brush my teeth?

Right. And it's just just the awareness that my brain was running off in the future and planning some fantasy scenario out of ego that that I was like, well, do I really care if I embarrass myself in Shane's podcast?

Who cares? I want to die anyway.

This is not going to go to zero, and I won't remember anything because it's pointless.

So at that point, I shut down.

I went back to brushing my teeth and then I was noticing how great the toothbrush was and how good it felt.

And then next moment, I'm off to thinking something else.

And then I have to look at my brain again, say, do I really need to solve this problem right now?

And the reality is that 95 % of what my brain runs off and tries to do, I don't need to tackle that exact moment.

In fact, if it's like a muscle, then I'll be better off resting it being at peace.

And then when the particular problem arises, immerse myself in it.

So what I would rather dedicate myself to is, for example, right now, as we're talking to be completely lost in the conversation and to be 100 % focused on this, as opposed to thinking about, oh, when I brush my teeth, they didn't do it the right way or, you know, planning something else in my mind.

So I think the ability to singularly focus is related to the ability to lose yourself and be present happy and actually, ironically, more effective.

That's fascinating.

It's almost like a relativity issue where you're taking yourself out of a certain frame and you're just moving over to another frame and watching things from a different perspective, even though you're in your own mind.

Yeah, I think that a lot of the, for example, what Buddhists talk about as awareness versus the ego, what they're really talking about is you can think of your brain, your consciousness as a multilayered mechanism.

And there's kind of a core base kernel level OS that's running.

And then there's applications that are running on top.

And I like to think of it as, you know, computer geek speak.

I'm actually going back to my awareness level OS, which is always calm, always peaceful and generally happy and content.

And I'm trying to stay in that mode and not activate the monkey mind, which is always worried and frightened and anxious, but serves incredible purpose.

But I'm trying not to activate that program until I need it because when I need it, I want to just focus on that program.

But if I'm running it 24 seven all the time, I'm wasting energy and it's just it and it becomes me and I am more than that.

Right. I think like another thing that spirituality or religion or Buddhism or any, anything you follow will teach you over time is that you are more than just your mind.

You are more than just your habits, you're more than just your preferences, your level of awareness, your body.

And you know, modern humans, we don't live enough in our body.

We don't live enough in our awareness.

We live too much in this internal monologue in our heads, all of which, by the way, is just programmed into you by society and by and by the environment from when you were younger.

You're basically a bunch of hardware DNA written that then reacted to environmental effects when you were younger.

Then you recorded the things that were good and bad and you use that to prejudge everything that's going to be thrown against you.

And then you're using that to constantly try and predict and change the future.

But as you get older and older, the sum of these preferences that you've accumulated is very, very large.

And some of these reactions, habitual reactions, that you can that is very, very large.

And then they end up as runaway freight trains that control your mood.

Well, we should control our own moods.

Why don't we study how to control our moods?

What a masterful thing that would be.

If you could say, well, right now I would like to be in the curious state.

And then you can genuinely set yourself into the curious state.

Or you say, I want to be in a morning state.

I'm morning a loved one and I want to grieve for them, but I really want to grieve.

I really want to feel that I don't want to be distracted right now by my computer programming problem that's due tomorrow.

So I think that the mind itself is a muscle and it can be trained and it can be conditioned.

It has just been haphazardly conditioned by society out of our control.

And if you look at it with awareness and intent and it's 24 seven job, you're working at every moment of every day, I think you can unpack your own mind and your emotions and your thoughts and your reactions.

If you start reconfigurating, you can start rewriting this program to what you want.

You mentioned before in one of your interviews that you have foundational values, but you didn't elaborate.

So I'm curious, what are those?

Yeah, it's a good question.

I've never actually listed them or articulated them.

But I would define values first of all as a set of things that you will not compromise on upon.

So foundational values to me are things that I've looked at very, very carefully about myself and I've deliberately chosen and said, you know what, this is a habit.

This is a way of life and I'm not going to compromise on it.

I'm going to stay this way forever.

I just don't want to live life any other way.

Now, I've never fully enumerated them, but examples of them like I think honesty is a core, core, core value.

To give you examples of what I mean by honesty is I want to be able to just be me.

I don't want to I never want to be in an environment around people who have to watch what I say, because if I disconnect what I'm thinking from what I'm saying, that creates multiple threads in my mind.

That means that I'm no longer in the moment.

That means that I now have to work future planning or past regretting every time I'm talking to somebody.

So anyone around whom I can't be fully honest, I don't want to be around.

Another example of foundational value is I don't believe in any short -term thinking or dealing.

So if I see anybody who's even around me, like let's say I'm doing business with somebody and they think in a short -term manner with somebody else, then I don't want to do business with that person anymore, because I think all the benefits in life come from compound interests, whether in money or in relationships

or love or health or activities or habits.

So I only want to be around people that I know I'm going to be around with for the rest of my life.

And I only want to work on things that I know have long -term payout.

Another one is like I only believe in peer relationships.

I don't believe in hierarchical relationships.

So I don't want to be above anybody and I don't want to be below anybody.

If I can't treat someone like a peer, and if they can't treat me like a peer, then I just don't want to interact with that human.

Another one is I don't believe in anger anymore.

I mean, that was something that was good when I was young and full of testosterone.

But now I always like the Buddhist saying that anger is a hot cold that you hold in your hand while waiting to throw it at somebody.

So, you know, I don't want to be angry and I don't want to be around angry people.

So I just cut them out of my life and I'm not judging them.

I mean, I went through a lot of anger too, and so, you know, they have to work through it on their own.

But go be angry at someone else somewhere else.

So I don't know if that necessarily falls into the classical definition of value, but it's a set of things that I won't compromise on and that I just live my entire life by.

And I think everybody has values and a lot of finding great relationships, great co -workers, great lovers, wives, husbands, is finding other people where your values just line up.

And then the little things don't matter.

Generally, I find that if people are fighting or quarreling about something, it's because their values don't line up.

Their values line up, the little things wouldn't matter.

How is radical honesty?

Like how radical is your honesty and how is that kind of impacted your life?

I mean, it's pretty honest.

I'm not like the, I think Ray Dalio from Bridgewater is famously, radically honest.

So I'm not going to go and call somebody ugly to their face.

Like I'm not trying to make a big show of it.

I'm not trying to say, hey, I'm so honest that I'm going to shock you.

What radical honesty just means that I want to be free.

Part of being free means that I can say what I think and think what I say.

They're highly congruent and integrated.

And it also means Richard Feynman famously said, you should never ever fool anybody and you are the easiest person to fool.

So the moment you tell somebody else something that's not honest, you've lied to yourself and then you'll start believing your own lie.

And then that will disconnect you from reality and take you down the wrong road.

So it's really important for me to be honest, but I don't go out of my way volunteering negative or nasty things.

I would combine radical honesty with an old rule that Warren Buffett has, which is praise specifically criticized generally.

And I try to follow this.

I don't always follow it.

But you know, I think I follow it enough that it made a difference in my life, which is if you have a criticism of someone, then don't criticize the person, criticize the general approach or criticize kind of that class of activities.

But if you have to praise somebody, then always try and find the person who's the best example of what you're praising and praise that person specifically.

And that way, people's egos and identities which we all have don't work against you.

They work for you. Have your values changed at all or have you given more thought to them since becoming married and becoming a parent?

I mean, how has that changed you?

Yeah, values almost by definition don't change that much over time.

But they take some it takes some time for you to figure out your own foundational values.

I think everybody has them.

It's just that maybe we're not that aware of them until later.

And so it might have changed a little bit, but not a lot.

I mean, my my wife is an incredibly loving family -oriented person and so on.

And so that was one of the foundational values that brought us together.

The moment you have a child, it's this really weird thing, but it sort of it answers the built -in meaning of life, purpose of life question.

And all of a sudden, the most important thing in the universe moves from being in your body into moving into the child's body.

So that that changes you and your values inherently become a lot less selfish.

You know, I would say that like probably the biggest such change was when I was younger, I really, really, really valued freedom.

Freedom was one of my core core values.

And ironically, it still is.

It's probably one of my top three values, but it's a different definition of freedom.

My old definition was freedom to freedom to do anything I want freedom to do whatever I feel like whenever I feel like.

And now I would say that the freedom that I'm looking for is internal freedom.

So it's freedom from it's freedom from reaction.

It's freedom from feeling angry.

It's freedom from being sad.

It's freedom from being forced to do things, but I'm looking for freedom from internally and externally.

Whereas before I was looking for freedom to like that a lot.

What's the the biggest mistake you've ever made in your life?

And how did you recover?

I've made a class of mistakes that I would summarize in the same way and I made this class of mistakes and it was obvious to me that these mistakes were only in hindsight through one exercise, which is you've probably heard the you know, when you're 30, what advice would you give your 20 year old self?

Yeah. I mean, you're 40.

Like what advice would you give your 20 year old self?

So if you do that exercise decade by decade or maybe if you're younger, you can do it in five.

Really sit down and say, okay, you know, 2007.

What was I doing? How was I feeling 2008?

What was I doing? How was I feeling 2009?

What was I doing? How was I feeling?

And at least for me that's remarkable consistency emerged and that consistency was that everything that I was doing.

I should have still done but with less emotion and especially less anger because I used to be very angry when I was younger, but especially it's less emotion life is going to play out the way it's going to play out some good some bad, but most of it is actually just up to your interpretation.

You're born you have a set of sensory experiences when you die and how you choose to interpret those sensory inputs is up to you and different people interpret them in different ways.

But really I wish I had done all of this in things, but with less emotion and less anger.

Like the most celebrated example would be, you know, when I was younger, started a company and the company did well, but I didn't do well.

So I sued some of the people involved and it was a good outcome for me in the end.

And everything worked out OK, but there was a lot of angst and a lot of anger.

And really today, you know, what I would do is I wouldn't go down the angst and the anger.

I would have just walked up to the people and said, look, this is what happened.

This is what I'm going to do.

This is I'm going to do it.

This is what's fair.

This is what's not, but I would have realized that the anger and the emotion themselves of this huge consequence is just completely unnecessary.

So now I'm just trying to learn from that and to do the same things that I think are the right thing to do.

But to do them without anger and to do them with a very long term point of view.

So I think if you take a very long term point of view and if you take the emotion out of it, then I wouldn't consider those things mistakes anymore.

Other than that, I mean, there is a, you know, the perspective I like to adopt is that everything that I did and everything that was done to me.

And, you know, there's some impossible, separate combination brought me to this exact moment here today talking to you and this is a good moment.

It's a great moment.

Yeah. So whatever set of circumstances conspired to bring us here, we're good because here I am.

Was there a moment you would say when you realized that you could control how you interpreted?

I mean, I think one of the problems that a lot of people have is they don't recognize that they can control not what happens to them per se, but how they respond and how they interpret a situation.

I think everyone knows it's possible.

And the reason they know it's possible is there's a great Osho lecture that he calls the title, The Attraction of Drugs is Spiritual.

And he talks about why do people do drugs?

Everything from alcohol, psychedelics, to cannabis to you name it.

And they're doing it to control their mental state and they're doing it to control how they react.

And sometimes it's worse and sometimes it's better.

But some people drink because then they don't care as much or they their potheads because they can zone out or they do psychedelics so that you feel very present or connected to nature or what have you.

But the attraction of drugs is spiritual.

So to some extent, we already know that we can control our internal state.

We just use external bioactive substances to do it.

And now there are a lot more techniques that are out there in the public domain.

Many of them dug up from older times, but these range from cognitive therapy and behavioral psychology to meditation to taking long walks in nature.

You can control your mental state.

It's just we're used to doing it by hacking our external circumstances to then come back around and control our mental state.

And for example, sitting on a there's a famous line that says that all of man's problems arise because he can't sit by himself in a room for 30 minutes.

A class to women, too.

Yeah, exactly. So if a man or a woman can sit by themselves on a cushion for 30 minutes and that's hard, it's really hard to do.

That's meditation. You are essentially struggling with and controlling your internal state.

And the first thing the first thing to realize is that you can actually observe your mental state.

So just the advantage of meditation is not that you're certainly going to gain superpower to control your internal state.

It's that you will recognize just how out of control your mind is.

It is like a monkey flinging feces that's running around the room, making trouble, shouting, breaking things.

It's completely uncontrollable.

It's an out of control, mad person.

And you have to see this mad creature in operation before you feel a certain distaste towards it and you start separating yourself from it.

And in that separation is liberation.

When you realize that, oh, I don't want to be that person.

Why am I so out of control?

Just that awareness alone calms you down.

So there are many techniques one can use.

Another one, for example, that I think a lot of smart people say is if you're angry about something or if you get an unhappy email and you want to respond, don't respond for 24 hours.

What does that do? It just you calm down.

You're the emotions subside, the hormones go down and you're a mental student, a better mental state 24 hours later.

So I think people already know this, but we just don't act on it because socially we're not conditioned to act on it.

Socially. We're told go work out.

Go look good because that's a multiplayer competitive game.

Other people can see if I'm doing a good job or not.

Are we told go make money, go buy a big house again?

External multiplayer competitive game.

But when it comes to learn to be happy, train yourself to be happy, completely internal, no external progress, no external validation, 100 percent you competing against yourself, single player again.

And we're such social creatures.

We're more like bees or ants that were externally programmed and driven that we just don't know how to play and win at these single player games anymore.

We compete purely on multiplayer games.

But the reality is life is a single player game.

You're born alone. You can die alone.

All your interpretations are alone.

All your memories are alone and you're gone three generations.

Nobody cares before you showed up.

Nobody cared. It's all single player.

I think Buffett has a great example of that when he gives the do you want to be the world's best lover and known as the worst or the world's worst lover and known as the best in reference to an inner or external score fair.

Exactly right. I mean, all the real scorecards are internal.

And the sad thing is, you know, we sit there like jealousy.

Jealousy was a very hard emotion for me to overcome.

When I was young, I had a lot of jealousy in me and by and by, you know, I learned to get rid of it and it still crops up every now and then.

But it's such a poisonous emotion because at the end of the day, you're no better off.

You're unhappy and the person you're jealous of is still successful or good looking or whatever they are.

But the real breakthrough was for me was when I realized at a personal fundamental level.

I mean, the problem with these kinds of podcasts is I can give glib answers all day long.

But you have to discover your own personal answer because your personal answers will be different than mine.

I'll speak to you. But the one that I discovered that spoke to me was a day I realized that all of these people that I was jealous of, I couldn't just cherry pick and choose a little aspects of their life.

I couldn't say I want his body.

I want her money. I want his personality.

You have to be that person.

Do you want to actually be that person with all of their reactions, their desires, their family, their happiness level, their outlook of life, their self image?

And if you're not willing to do a wholesale twenty four, seven hundred percent swap with who that person is, then there's no point in being jealous.

I think that's a great way to look at it.

Once I came to that realization, jealousy sort of faded away because I don't want to be anybody else.

I'm perfectly happy being me.

And by the way, even that is under my control to be happy being me.

It's just there's no social rewards for it.

But there's a lot of internal rewards.

Yeah, there's it's almost anti -social rewards because when you're when you're working on your inner stuff, people don't love that.

It's that they don't dislike it.

Your friends, of course, support you, but they're not getting anything out of it.

And even when I look at my own peer group and to the extent that they're working on themselves and everyone in their 40s at some level is most ever engaged in group activities.

Hey, let's do a group meditation.

Hey, let's go to this group event.

Hey, let's go to this group lecture.

And I keep coming back to this one line that I read like everything I just read, but which was said only the individual transcends.

Nobody reaches enlightenment or or or or internal happiness or does serious internal work in group settings.

It is a very lonely kind of task.

So to some extent, I think that people who are constantly looking for social affirmation in their internal work, aren't that serious about it.

And it's fine. I'm not judging, but just they're craving more social interaction than they're really craving internal work.

What big ideas have you changed your mind on in the last few years?

There's a lot on kind of the life level.

There's a couple obviously in the business level.

I think on a more practical basis, I've just stopped believing in macroeconomics.

I studied economics in school and computer science.

And there the time when I thought I was going to go be a PhD in economics and all that.

But the further I get, the more I read macroeconomics is a combination of who do complex systems and politics.

And you can find macroeconomists to take every side of every argument.

So I think that discipline, because it doesn't make falsifiable predictions, which is the hallmark of science, because it doesn't make falsifiable predictions, has become corrupted.

Because you never have the the counterexample on the economy.

You never can never take the US economy and run two different experiments at the same time.

And because there's so much data, people kind of cherry pick for whatever political narrative they're trying to push.

So to the extent that people spend all their time watching the macro economy or the Fed forecasts or which way the stocks are going to go the next year, it's going to be a good year of value.

That's all junk. It's no better than astrology.

In fact, it's probably even worse, because it's less entertaining.

It's just more stress inducing.

So I just think of macroeconomics not as junk science with all apologies to macroeconomists.

That said, microeconomics and game theory are fundamental.

I don't think you can be successful in business or even navigating through most of our modern capitalist society without an extremely good understanding of supply and demand and labor versus capital and game theory and tit for tat and those kinds of things.

So that that macroeconomics is a religion that I gave up.

But there are many others, I mean, I've changed my mind on death, on the nature of life, on the purpose of life, on marriage.

You know, I was originally not someone who wanted to be married and have kids.

So there have been a lot of fundamental changes.

But the most practical one is I gave up macro and I embraced micro.

And I would say that's just not true in macroeconomics.

That's true in everything.

I don't believe in macro environmentalism.

I believe in micro environmentalism.

I don't believe in macro charity.

I believe in micro charity.

I don't believe in macro improving the world.

Like there's a lot of people out there who get really fired up about going to change the world.

I'm going to change this person.

I'm going to change the way people think.

I think about micro, it's like change yourself then maybe change your family and your neighbor before you get into abstract concepts about going to change the world.

What part of your your base knowledge that you have today that you believe, do you consider the least solid or most likely to change over the coming years?

Good question. I mean, I try not to have too much that I've pre decided upon.

I think that creating identities and labels locks you in and keeps you from seeing the truth.

So I used to identify as libertarian, but then I would have to find myself defending positions that I hadn't really thought through just because they're part of libertarian canon.

The reality is that if all of your beliefs line up into neat little bundles, you should be highly suspicious because they're pre -packaged and put together.

So I don't like to self -identify almost any level anymore that keeps me from having too many of these so -called stable beliefs.

So it's hard for me to point to something that I think is shaky because if I thought it was really shaky, then I wouldn't stand on it.

I guess the areas where I'm becoming least certain is kind of all the I call it the grand category of how should we organize society beliefs?

Everybody has them.

You know, some people think we should be communist.

Some people are capitalists, some are anarchists.

Some say we need a larger welfare state.

We need universal health care and basic income and others say, no, we need to.

I think that entire class of beliefs, they're unfalsifiable, they're based, they're almost religious.

There are things that people got into when they were young.

Nobody actually knows which system is the better one.

Nobody actually knows which one maximizes happiness versus output, which is whatever.

I know there's a lot of smart economists and people studying it.

There's a lot of good data and science.

But the end of the day, and the more I look into it, the more I come away saying, well, maybe I don't know how best to organize society.

Maybe society should not have just one organization, but should have multiple organizations.

So you can choose and you can go into whichever society where you were most bound to thrive.

But I don't think there is a single right answer for human culture and society anymore, except to the extent that given the increasingly destructive power of technology, you know, a long enough time scale.

Long enough time scale, you can 3D print a nuclear weapon.

On a long enough time scale, you can create a singularity in your backyard as part of your high school physics project.

So I think as a human race, we do have to sort of get past this idea that we're separate organisms and kind of almost get into some kind of a multicellular organism situation.

Otherwise, we'll just destroy ourselves.

It will just be too easy to blow ourselves up.

And that obviously runs very, very counter to my libertarian instincts of everyone should be free and whatever they want, etc, etc.

So I just don't know how to organize society anymore.

And I think any beliefs that I have, any remnant beliefs that I have from being younger about the optimal way to organize society are probably wrong.

And the future thriving society that we end up with that maybe a thousand years from now will probably look like something that I would argue very strongly against today because they will have no room for the individual.

Maybe you can explain for listeners the singularity and kind of what your thoughts are around that.

Yeah, the singularity is this idea that technological change is accelerating.

And then at some point, the acceleration gets so great that there's massive change in our lifetimes.

We create things like general AI, we start living forever and just the nature of who we are as humans changes the consequence of that.

It's most associated with the general AI.

If we produce a general purpose, artificial intelligence, that artificial intelligence could then hack its own code, make itself smarter and outdevolve us to the point where we are either obsolete or immortal or something in between.

My thoughts on it, I think it's a fancy fault, to say the least.

Nick Bostrom wrote a very famous book called Super Intelligence, which lays out the past of it.

There are good rebuttals to super intelligence.

So I wouldn't just read that book, you know, breathless and wide -eyed and believe everything.

And there are people like the Singularity Institute who are looking forward to this coming.

I think it's religion for nerds, you know, it's got all the same characteristics.

It's unfalsifiable until it happens.

It basically says that chosen ones will be saved, the world is going to end, you know, we will be immortal.

It's very hard to tell apart from a biblical kind of story.

And I find the people who are pushing it the most are what I would call sort of armchair technologists.

Like they might understand a little bit of science, but these are not the PhDs in physics who are pushing this.

It's not like the field's medal winning mathematician who's pushing this.

You know, I was trained in a little bit of science and I consider myself an amateur scientist and I know just enough to know how little we know.

You know, physics still can't solve the three -body problem, collide three billion balls together, can't tell you what happens.

We cannot properly model complex systems.

We can't tell the weather next week.

We still can't solve the vast majority of chronic diseases.

We're just starting to connect the gut and the brain and bacteria in our system together.

There is so much complexity in nature and humans have just begun to scratch the surface that to believe that we are going to sort of go into this world of perfection through technology I think is far -fetched.

Like for example, AI, everyone's talking about AI.

None of these people have written real code.

We are no closer to creating a general AI.

I think that we were 20 years ago.

Now there are actual huge advances that have been made in specific AI, but these are data processing problems.

Basically, if I dump huge amounts of real -world images into a neural network, then I can do better image recognition.

No question. That is real.

That is a data -driven solution.

The algorithms haven't gotten any better and the structure of how the human brain works and how the human body works is still so far advanced beyond our machine capabilities that certainly if there's going to be singularity, it's not going to happen in my lifetime.

And I think in that sense, some things like the singularity are pernicious.

They're pernicious for the same reason that the afterlife is pernicious because it takes you out of the moment.

It gives you hope for the future.

So you stop living for today and you start living for tomorrow.

And I know that doesn't sound like much.

But it's actually a big deal.

Any given time when you're walking down the street, a very small percentage of your brain is focused on the present.

The rest is future planning or regretting the past.

And that's keeping you from an incredible experience.

It's keeping you from seeing the beauty in everything and for being grateful for where you are.

And I think it can literally destroy your happiness if you spend all your time living in delusions of the future.

So I do think the singularity thing is good in the sense that it pushes forward technological advancement.

We put more resources on it.

We spend more time developing some of the great things that the human race, some of the great technologies are going to take advantage of.

So anything that pushes science forward is a good thing.

But I think it's delusional to think that you're somehow going to be saved before you die by some combination of AI and magic science.

You just have to live the life you have.

That's pretty profound.

Even when you're living backwards, you're not really living, right?

You kind of have to be in the moment to have any sort of happiness.

There is actually nothing but this moment.

No one has ever gone back in time and no one has ever been able to predict the future successfully in any way that matters.

And so literally the only thing that exists is this exact point where you are in space at that exact time that you happen to be.

And it's like all the great profound truths.

It's all paradoxes.

So any two points are infinitely different.

Any moment is perfectly unique, but that moment itself slips by so quickly that you can't grab it.

What's your opinion on the current education system?

When I ask people on Twitter what they wanted to ask you, this question came up a couple times, which was, how would you fix it?

What's your opinion on the education system?

What are your thoughts around that?

I think there's no question.

It's completely obsolete.

The education system is a path -dependent outcome from the need for daycare, from the need for prisons for college -aged males who would otherwise overrun society and cause a lot of havoc.

The original medieval universities had guard towers that face inwards, for example.

I do not know that.

Yeah, because you have to put a curfew and then you need to lock up the young 18 -year -old males before they go out with swords and daggers and create trouble.

So college and schools and the way we think about them, they come from a time period when books were rare.

Knowledge was rare.

Baby sitting was rare.

Crime was common. Violence was prevalent.

There was no such self -guided learning.

So I think schools are just byproducts of these kinds of institutions.

And now we have the internet, which is the greatest web of knowledge ever created completely interconnected.

So it's very, very easy to learn.

If you actually have the desire to learn, everything is on the internet.

You can go on Khan Academy.

You can get MIT and Yale lectures online.

You can get all the coursework and get interactivity.

You can read blogs by brilliant people.

We can read all these great books.

So it's so the ability to learn, the means of learning, the tools of learning are abundant and infinite.

It's a desire to learn that's incredibly scarce.

So I don't I just don't think that schools matter for self -motivated students.

What the schools matter for is wanting to keep the kids out of the parents' hair while the parents go to work.

It creates socialization because kids want to be around their peers and they want to learn how to operate society of their peers.

But I think if it's purely learning, your actor, that learning can be done much more either on your own or through the internet or by uniting through the internet with like -minded groups.

So I think that's one problem with the current educational system.

The second problem is, what do you choose to learn?

And the current educational system has to have a one -size -fits -all model.

It has to say, well, you have to learn X now and then you have to learn Y.

And to give you examples of where this is obsolete, memorization, right?

In the day and age of Google and smartphones, memorization is obsolete.

Why should you be memorizing the battle of Trafalgar?

Why you should be memorizing what the capital of this or that state is?

But we still put undue weight on that just because that's the way it's always been done and we live in a pre -Google world.

Another example is how when we're moving along at a certain pace, I'm sure not everyone, but I'm sure 90 % of your listeners have had this happen to them, which is they were learning mathematics.

And at some point, they were they were keeping up.

They were doing arithmetic and they were doing geometry and they did anometry.

They did pre -calc and they did calc and somewhere in there they got lost somewhere in there while building the massive edifice.

So that logical structure that mathematics is they missed one lesson.

They missed one concept.

They missed five classes or they just didn't, they just their brain couldn't think a certain way that something was being explained to them.

It should have been explained visually, but it was being explained numerically or it should have been explained symbolically and it was being explained in cartesian.

But what have you but they were not able to keep up.

And the moment you lose that rung in mathematics, the moment you miss that rung in the ladder, you can't go to the next one because now in the next one, the teacher's like, okay, we're done with pre -calculus.

Now we're moving on to calculus.

You're saying wait, I didn't understand pre -calculus and I understand how pre -calculus leads from trigonometry to calculus and miss that whole part.

So now you get the calculus.

You don't understand the fundamentals and now you reduce the memorization.

So now you're like, okay, DXDY when I see that symbol, I do this but now you've lost the actual learning.

You've lost the connection to the underlying principles.

So I think learning should be about learning the basics in all the fields.

I'm learning them really well over and over because life is mostly about applying the basics and only doing the advanced stuff in the things that you truly love and where you understand the basics inside out.

But that's not how our system is built.

We teach all these kids calculus and they walk out not understanding calculus at all when really they would have been better off -serve just doing arithmetic and basic computer programming the entire time.

So I think there's a pace of learning issue and then there's finally a what to learn and there's a whole set of things we don't even bother trying to teach.

We don't teach nutrition.

We don't teach cooking.

We don't teach how to be in happy positive relationships.

We don't teach how to keep your body healthy and fit.

We just say sports.

We don't teach happiness.

We don't teach meditation.

Maybe we shouldn't teach some of these things because different kids will have different aptitudes, but maybe we should.

Maybe we should teach practical construction of technology and maybe everyone in the science project.

Instead of building a little chemistry volcano, maybe you should be building a smartphone.

So we just haven't kept up and I have to believe that we can change the system, but you never change a system by taking the existing thing and reworking it.

I've been in Silicon Valley tech business long enough to know that you're better off changing it just by creating something brand new.

So one fantasy idea I've had is after I'm done with the Angel Lister if I have more time in my hands, I would like to create a successor to the One Laptop Project in MIT.

Nicholas Nagrapanti had the One Laptop per Child project.

But then I saw this fascinating write up.

This is really long time ago.

Maybe even five years ago, maybe it was an economist or somewhere.

It was a story about how they left a box full of unopened Android tablets in a little village in Pakistan.

And when they came back months later, the kids have opened up the box.

They've all figured out how to boot up the tablets.

They've hacked them.

They've gotten passed through the user administration root login.

They've installed a whole bunch of apps.

They've got a little economy set up.

The older kids are teaching the younger kids.

They're teaching their grandmothers how to run businesses.

They're surfing the web.

They've taught themselves English.

You know, kids are learning Sheens.

They just need the tools.

So to that end, what I would love to do is create a very low cost, very rugged, easily powered, cheap, Android tablet that's hard to destroy and basically distribute them around the world with pre -built learning applications so that you can literally fire one up and it works with you interactively in 30

seconds that figures out what language do you speak, if any.

Or you can just be symbolic.

And what level of aptitude are you at?

Are you a second grader, third grader, fifth grader?

And of course, it varies by different discipline.

And they'll let you dive into and let you learn anything you want that will make your life better.

Just going back to my original competency.

Exactly. And it always keeps you on the edge and always keeps pushing you.

And then you can network in all the teachers of the world.

So anyone who wants to be a teacher can contribute, not just Salman Khan doing Khan Academy.

But essentially, you could network, connect all the teachers of the world and all the students of the world using tablets and do it at a pace and level where it's essentially customized for each child and they're learning the things that have a practical outcome in their life.

I know there's an advantage to liberal arts education, pushing things that people don't necessarily want to learn on their own, but they have to have some desire for it.

It's better to wait until they think they're ready and then give it all to them.

Because I think that's the way that learning sticks.

So that's the kind of project they like to work on.

But I don't I don't think it's solvable with the current school system.

I hope you get a chance to work on that.

I think that'd be a phenomenal impact to the world.

Yeah, I think I think it would be fun.

And I'm thinking about this now more because I have a young infant side.

And honestly, I don't want to send him to school.

How do you as an adult?

I mean, you mentioned a couple physics books in the start of the interview here.

How do you as an adult go about learning new subjects you specifically in?

Yeah, mostly I just stay on the basics.

So even when I'm learning physics or science, I'm sticking to the basics.

So I'll read concepts for fun, but I'm more likely to do something that is arithmetic in calculus.

I'm not going to be a great physicist at this point, maybe in the next lifetime when my kid will do it, but it's too late for me.

So I have to stick to what I enjoy.

And what I love about science is mathematics is the language of nature.

Sciences to me is a study of truth.

It is the only true discipline because it makes falsifiable predictions.

Actually changes the world.

And applied science becomes technology and technology is what separates us from the animals and allows us to have things like cell phones and houses and cars and eat and electricity.

So science to me is a study of truth and mathematics is the language of science and nature.

So in that sense, I'm not religious, but I'm spiritual.

And to me that is the most devotional thing that I could do to study the laws of the universe.

And so the same kick that some guy might get out of being in Mecca or Medina and bowing to the Prophet.

I get that same feeling of awe and that same small sense of self when I study science.

So for me, it's unparalleled and I'd rather stay at the basics and start at the end.

This is the beauty of reading.

It's a one thing I don't like to do.

By the way, when I do my books on the Kindle, I skip two -thirds of them and the reason I skip two -thirds of them is because they're kind of embarrassing.

They won't sound like good books to read.

They'll sound like trivial or silly or whatever, but who cares?

I mean, I don't have to tell everybody everything I read.

I read all kinds of stuff that other people consider junk or even reprehensible.

I read all kinds of stuff that I disagree with because of Mindbender.

I found myself in some random dark hole in Twitter the other day where I was reading this guy's tweets.

I was like, wow, he's really smart.

He's really interesting.

I was very clever. Like wait a minute.

This guy's a full -blown white supremacist.

I mean, he's not even like mildly a white supremacist.

He just thinks like everyone in the white race should be gone and people like me shouldn't be allowed on the streets, but it was still fascinating and he's still really smart and I kept reading it and I read it and read it and read it.

After a while, I built up my own sense of his coherent view of the world and where he was coming from, but to do that, I couldn't have judged too much and I'm certainly not going to go around bragging to my friend.

Hey, I learned this from a white supremacist the other day, right?

So to some level, you almost have to read the stuff you're reading because you're into it and that's it.

You don't need any other reason.

There's no mission here to accomplish.

Just read because you enjoy it.

If you read what everybody else is reading, I mean, there's wisdom that you're going to think what everybody else is thinking.

So you need the diversity and almost like an index fund approach, right?

Where you're going to catch the winners, but you can't really identify a lot of them beforehand.

They're going to change you as a person because so much of that is contextual.

Yeah, I think almost everything that people read these days is designed for social approval.

You know, all the best sellers are about social improvement, social conditioning.

If you really want it to be successful, happy, blah blah blah, all those external metrics, you're looking for a non -average outcome.

And so you can't be reading the average thing to your point.

And all these things are actually as old as the hills.

You can go read Adam Smith and the Wealth of Nations.

You can go read Benjamin Franklin and his aphorisms and understand how to live your life.

You could read Charlie Munger.

You could read, you could read Charles Darwin understand evolution and the source.

You could read Watson and Crick and understand the structure of double hits and DNA.

But instead, what we choose to read are just, you know, whatever's number one at the airport bestseller or whatever our friends are reading, or we read.

I know people who have read a hundred regurgitated books of evolution and they've never read Darwin or they've read they've got or take the number of macroeconomists and they're out there.

I think there's most of them who have read tons of treatises and economics, but haven't read any Adam Smith.

Yeah, right. So at some level, you're doing it for social approval.

You're doing it to fit in with the other monkeys.

You're fitting to get along with a herd, but that's not where the returns are in life.

The returns in life are being out of the herd.

Social approval inside the herd.

So if you want social approval, definitely go read what the herd is reading, but it takes a level of contrarianism and saying, nope, I'm just going to do my own thing regardless of the social outcome to learn anything.

I think that's interesting.

Do you think there's some sort of loss aversion there because once you diverge you're pushing out say there's a Gaussian distribution.

You're pushing out to one of the tails and if you feel that you're going to lose out on that, you would rather just stay in the middle.

If there's a chance that you're not going to be in the in the fat tail for a positive.

Absolutely. I think that's why the smartest and most successful people I know started out as losers.

If you view yourself as a loser as someone who's been cast up by society and has no role in normal society, then you will do your own thing and you're much more likely to find a winning path.

So it helps to just start up by saying, oh, I'm never going to be popular and never going to be accepted.

I'm already a loser.

I'm not going to get what all the other kids have.

I just got to be happy to be mean.

Yeah, I think that's true.

When you're reading, do you just read and it sticks in your head or is it more like you take notes?

Do you have a system for how you keep track of that or review them?

I'm both lazy and I'm really focused on being present.

So I think taking notes is the same as taking photos when you're on a trip.

All it's doing is taking you out of the moment and then who really sits there, you know, years later and goes back and looks at all their trip photos and gets in a salad.

Just go take your next trip.

So I just don't believe in anything from the past, anything, no memories, no regrets, no people, no trips, nothing.

Because a lot of our unhappiness also comes from comparing things from the past to the present.

First time you saw a sunset, it was amazing.

It was jaw -dropping.

You forgot yourself.

The second time you saw it, it was cool.

The hundredth time you say it's nothing.

The thousandth time you're saying, and someone shows you a sunset, you're like, well, actually, I saw this one sunset in Mexico this time.

That was really cool.

You're not even there.

So I just don't believe in clinging too much to memories and that includes in reading.

So I do highlight, I catch myself doing that, but I do it more because it's just kind of a way of rereading and rereading that particular paragraph at that moment in time.

And then once in a blue moon for my especially favorite books, I want to reread the book, but I'll be short on time.

So I'll just reread the highlighted passages until something catches my eye and then I got sucked back into the book.

But the reality is I could stop highlighting tomorrow and it would make no difference.

And note -taking is even, I think, harder than that.

So I do not take notes.

But everyone's brain works differently.

You know, some people love to take notes.

Actually, my note -taking is Twitter.

So what I do is I read and read and read and if I have some fundamental aha insight or concept then what I like about Twitter is it forces me to distill that into a hundred forty characters and then I try and put it out there as an aphorism.

And then I get attacked by all kinds of random people and I point at all kinds of obvious exceptions and jump down my throat like why do I do this again?

And then I go into hiding for a while.

You have one of the most thoughtful Twitter feeds that I know of.

So I don't I don't I hope nobody jumps down your throat too bad there.

Thank you. When you first pick up a book, are you skimming for something interesting?

Like, how do you go about reading it or do you just flip to a random page and start reading?

What's your process for that?

Yeah, I'll start at the beginning, but I'll move fast.

So if it's not interesting, I'll just start flipping ahead or I'll start skimming or speed reading.

If it doesn't grab my attention within the first chapter in a meaningfully positive way, I'll either drop the book or I'll skip ahead a few chapters.

I don't believe in delayed gratification when there's an infinite number of books out there to read.

There are so many great books and there's so many that are so well written that you know, I just can't spend my time on these.

One thing I will do though, is if I find that early on in the book, the author starts making statements that I think are just factually untrue and one should always be open to new ideas, but if they're starting to make contradictions where the epistemological load of acknowledging that contradictory,

sorry to use that 50 cent word, but I would have to revisit my entire lifetime of learning and undo it and start over.

Yeah, exactly. Or like, you know, I had a very conversation recently with a guy who sounded really really smart and was throwing all kinds of science at me and my head was spinning and then he basically said and as we know, you know, thermodynamics isn't really true.

I was the point of it, so they're like, okay, I got to discard everything you just said because thermodynamics is fundamental.

It's what the undo button is for.

Yeah, that thermodynamics is not even a theory, it's a law, it comes from the mathematics.

So you want to put that out then we just have to, we have no basis for conversation.

So if I find something like that in a book where someone says, oh, yes, I cleared my mind and I watched my thought process and then I was able to levitate, then I have to put the book down because now I don't know what in here is true and what in here is false.

Basically what I'm looking for is the author knowingly lying or completely diluted and if they are then I can't fill my brain with a junk because I can't separate truth from for fiction.

So generally, I'll skim, I'll fast forward, I'll try and find a part that catches me.

Usually though, what happens in most books, those most books have one point to make and obviously nonfiction, not talking about fiction, but they have one point to make, they make it and then they give you example after example after example after example and they apply it to explain everything in the world.

And once I feel like I've gotten the gist of it, I feel very comfortable putting the book down.

So there's a lot of these, what I would call like pseudo science bestsellers that are all over, you know, that everyone's always reading and people are like, oh, did you read this book?

And I always say yes, but the reality is I read maybe two chapters of it, but I got the gist.

I want to switch gears and talk a little bit about decision making which is kind of what you get paid to do both as an investor and the CEO of AngelList.

You're kind of paid to be right when other people are wrong.

Do you have a process around how you make decisions?

Yeah, so decision making is everything and in fact, someone who makes decisions right 80 % of the time, so 70 % of time will be valued and compensated in the market hundreds of times more and I think people have a hard time understanding that but that's a fundamental factor of leverage.

If I'm managing a billion dollars and I'm right, you know, 10 % more of the time than somebody else and that's a hundred million dollars worth of value on a judgment call and with modern technology and large workforces and capital, our decision is getting leveraged more and more.

So if you can be more right, more rational and that's one of the reasons why I love your blog because it's really focuses on helping you be more right, better decision, make it more rational than you're going to just get nonlinear returns in your life.

So decision making is everything and decision making what what's going on.

We're basically what the brain is a memory prediction machine and as a memory of things that work in the past and what it's read and it's trying to predict the future and allows you way to do memory prediction is X happened in the past.

Therefore X will happen in the future.

It's two based on specific circumstances.

So what you want is you want principle you want mental models.

So the best mental model that I have found have come through evolution game theory and Charlie Munger who I'm sure you quote a lot on your blog, but Charlie Munger who's Warren Buckets partner, very good investor, but he's tons and tons of great mental models.

Nassim Taleb has great mental models.

The Benjamin Franklin had great mental models.

So I basically load my head full of mental models but then different ones apply to every situation.

So I don't really run a checklist.

But for example, I studied a lot of complexity theory when I was younger.

It's a field that I got into a gun occasionally, just getting these things and I just learn a lot about that field and my most recent was cryptography, but I was really into into complexity theory back in the mid 90s and the more I got into it, the more I understand the limits of our knowledge and the limits

of our prediction capability and that's been super helpful to me.

So that has helped me come to the system that operates in the face of ignorance and I believe that fundamentally we are ignorant and very very bad at predicting the future.

So I don't look for and I don't believe that I have the ability to say what is going to work.

So rather what I try to do is I try to eliminate what's not going to work.

So I think being successful is just about not making mistakes.

It's not about, you know, having correct judgments.

It's about avoiding the incorrect judgments.

So I have mental models around how do I determine if I can trust somebody around, you know, what are the actual odds that this is going to work?

How much margin of safety do I have?

If it works out? You know, the Angel bets and venture bets are great because they've not linear outcome in the positive, but the downside you can only lose one X but the upside you can make 10 ,000 X.

So I tried to rig the game, so I don't believe in specific goals.

Scott Adams said famously also set of systems, not goals.

So use your judgment to figure out what kinds of environments you can thrive in and then build a system to create that environment around you so that you're statistically likely to succeed.

I don't I'm not going to be the most successful person on the planet nor do I want to be.

I just want to be the most successful version of me while working the least hard possible.

Right. I want to be in a thousand universes.

Nival is successful, $999.

He's not a billionaire, but you know, he's done pretty well in all of them.

Right. So whatever the metric is or he's happily married in most of them.

He may not have, you know, nailed it in every regard, but he set up systems such that he's failed in very few places.

So so basically, I just try and set up good systems and then the individual decisions aren't that don't matter that much because I think our ability to make individual decisions is actually not great.

So for example, the investor I would rather invest I would rather my system is I want to see 10 ,000 companies and I want to pick 500 that have a shot of being huge and then I want the option to double down on the five winners.

I don't want to just look at a hundred companies and pick 10 that I think are winners and go all in on those.

Right. Because I don't think I had that capability and I think there's a lot of ex post facto reasoning and and sort of origin stories that people make up about why they were successful.

But the real separation here is you look at which people are consistently successful, especially in Silicon Valley.

There are lots of one -hit wonders, but how many people consistently seem to do something interesting, build something interesting, make money and do something new.

I'm not I'm not in this to make money.

Money is just a piece of paper and every time I see one of these billionaire founders, you know, giving away to a hospital or whatever, you know, they overshot they need that much money.

So there's huge diminishing returns to money after a certain point, especially now that I'm more into freedom from rather than freedom to the thing I want to do that I can't do.

So literally money in that sense is a boat anchor on my neck because all it is something that I'm then fearful of losing something.

I'm getting the jealousy debates about my people want from me.

So I'm not even in any more for the money.

It's like can I do something interesting and new can I create something brand new the world has never seen that it gets value out of that it uses that is congruent with my morals.

So I never have problems sleeping at night and I never have to worry about selling something that I wouldn't buy.

So much more into that, but I don't I don't have a checklist system for decision -making.

I know that's like a big thing recently I told God one day wrote the checklist Manifesto and that's good for pilots and surgeons.

I don't think it's necessarily great for investors.

Yeah, totally misses the decision -making.

I agree and by the way, that's another one of those books where you just read the first chapter when you're done.

It would have made a great blog post, but yeah, so I also don't think you need to be that hard on yourself.

A lot of a lot of what goes on today as a lot of your listeners are right now like beating themselves up and scribbling notes and saying I need to do this and I need to do that.

And I need to do no, you don't need to do anything.

You know, all you should do is what you want to do.

And if you stop trying to figure out how to do things the way other people want you to do them, then you get to listen to that little voice inside of your head that wants to do things a certain way and then you get to be you and no one in the world is going to beat you at being you.

You're never going to be as good at being me as I am and I'm never going to be as good at you being you as you are.

So certainly listen absorb, but don't try and emulate the fool's errand instead each person is uniquely qualified at something.

They have some specific knowledge capability and desire that nobody else in the world does.

That's just purely from the combinatorics of human DNA and development.

And so because and so your goal in life is to find out the people who need you the most to find out the business that needs you the most by the project and the art that needs you the most because there's something out there just for you.

But what you don't want to do is be building checklist and decision frameworks built on what other people are doing because you're never going to be them.

You'll never be good at being somebody else.

Yeah, and you're inevitably going to miss stuff too and checklist.

You mentioned kind of like how you determine if you can trust somebody and I know you've said in the past these kind of use Buffet's criteria for evaluating people which is the combination of intelligence energy and integrity.

What predictive signals do you pay attention to for each?

How do you determine if you can trust someone?

A large part of your job is that one?

Yeah, integrity is the hardest one and integrity usually comes out in two ways.

One is long -term, which is just you've known somebody for a while and you kind of know, you know, how to think about things.

But the most the more interesting one there's a short -term one which is you just kind of see how they treat other people.

So there are lots and lots of people who will, you know, not screw over screw over just a strong word, but they will do something that is self -feeling or slightly unethical relative to another business partner.

But the whole time they'll say to you nudge nudge wink wink I, you know, I'm taking advantage of that person because they deserve it, but you're my friend.

I would never do that to you.

Of course. And the thing is, yeah, exactly.

It's very easy to change your definition of who friends are.

I find that the people who really do things out of integrity, they have an internal moral compass.

So they don't they don't do unfair unethical or bad deals with other people because it would soil their own view of themselves and they wouldn't be able to sleep with themselves at night.

So some of the highest integrity people I know the worst thing you can do is you can say them, well, I think you're self -feeling on that one and they will get so unhappy because they'll be like, no, no, no, no, that's not who I am.

I can't be that person and they'll bend over backwards.

Usually I find that people that I negotiate with who are high integrity, they're very easy to negotiate with.

They'll give you things that they don't need to give you because they think it's fair and vice versa.

So negotiations with the high integrity people are usually very easy, giving each other things to make sure the other person is happy enough.

The deal survives because unhappy deals get unwound and they become short -term relationships which don't have any compounding benefits.

And then finally, if someone is going around and talking about how honest they are, they're probably dishonest.

That's just like a little telltale to indicate I've learned.

When someone spends too much time talking about their own values or talking themselves up, they're covering for something.

So there's actually a good book.

It's kind of out of print.

I think it's hard to track down.

Maybe you can find it online somewhere and it's not the obvious one.

The name of the book is called The Art of Manipulation.

And I found it because of a tweet that I followed from Illocertus and it was really good.

It was because this guy basically goes under cover and lives with con men and he spends time with him running cons and learning all about cons and he's very without judgment.

He just lays down how con men work and he puts down there how to spot them when they're being dishonest and some of the telltale signs are they will they'll push the deal a little bit too hard.

They'll sell just a little bit too hard.

They'll talk about how honest they are.

But I have great people in my life who are extremely successful, very desirable, like everybody wants to be their friend, very smart.

And yet I've seen them do one or two things that are slightly not great to other people and the first time I'll tell them I'll go up and say, hey look, I don't I don't think you should do that to that other person not because you won't get away with it.

You will get away with it, but because it'll hurt you in the end not in some cosmic karma kind of way, but just I believe that deep down we all know who we are.

You cannot hide anything from yourself.

And so your own failures are written within your psyche and they're obvious to you.

And so if you have too many of these moral shortcomings, you will not respect yourself and the worst the worst outcome in this world is not having self -esteem.

If you don't love yourself who will so I think this is you just have to be very careful about doing things that you were fundamentally not going to be proud of because they will damage you.

So the first time around I warned them, by the way, nobody changes.

And then I just kind of distance myself from them.

It's sort of, you know, cut them out of my life.

Like I I just had this saying inside my head the closer you want to get to me the better your values have to be.

And example, I meant my yeah when I met my wife, it was a great test because I really wanted to be with her and she wasn't so sure at the beginning.

And so in the end we ended up together because she saw my values.

And I'm lucky I had developed them by that point because if I hadn't I wouldn't have gotten her not that I own her anything is no attachment like that, but but I wouldn't have deserved her.

It's like as Charlie Munger says to find a worthy mate be worthy of a worthy mate.

So I think, you know, working on your values is long -term selfish, although short -term it's absolutely above sacrifices.

If being ethical were profitable, everybody would do it.

It wouldn't have to have a separate concept when you talk about it.

There would be no books on it.

There would be no no one would ever tell my values could they be profitable, but it's not it's obviously unprofitable involve sacrifices, but like everything in life, if you're willing to make the short -term sacrifice, you'll have a long -term benefit my physical trainer, you know, Jersey Gregorick, really

wise brilliant guy, he always says, you know, easy choices, hard life, hard choices, easy life.

So basically if you're making the hard choices right now and what to eat, you're not eating all the junk food you want and being the hard choice to work out, then your life long -term will be easy.

You won't be sick. You won't be unhealthy.

Same is true of value.

Same is true of saving up for any days.

Same is true of how you approach your relationships.

But if you make the easy choices right now, your overall life will be a lot harder.

I like I want to dive into intelligence a little bit there too, like how do you separate the people who know what they're talking about from these people who pretend they know what they're doing?

I mean, we're full of a world where it's so easy to pretend you have knowledge that you don't actually have.

Real knowledge is intrinsic and that it's built from the ground up.

So going back to my math example earlier, you can understand trigonometry without saying arithmetic or geometry.

So basically someone is using a lot of fancy words and a lot of big concepts.

They probably don't know what they're talking about.

I think the smartest people can explain things to a child.

And if you can't explain to a child, then you don't know it.

And I think that's very true.

I know the common saying but Richard Fineman, you know, very famously, if you go into his lecture, Six Easy Pieces, where his early physics lectures, he has one where he basically explains mathematics in three pages.

He starts from number line counting and then he goes all the way up to pre -calculus and he just builds it up through an unbroken chain of logic.

He doesn't rely on any definitions.

You know, for example, if somebody says like, oh that bird is called this or you know, the rule for this thing is that they're not really telling you anything fundamental.

They're telling you about humans.

They're telling you about naming systems.

True understanding is about algorithms, about understanding how things connect to each other.

So if I think it's the Mark of a charlatan to try and explain simple things in complicated ways as the Mark of a genius to explain complicated things in simple ways.

So really they should be able to do it very very very very simply and I have to catch myself on this because I have a big vocabulary that read a lot so I can sound smarter than I am just by using big words, but in the process, I'm being dishonest with myself.

It's okay to use more precise words.

You know English is a big language with a lot of words and so that allows for a lot of precision.

But if you're deliberately using words that your audience doesn't know or if you even think you're using a word that your audience doesn't know and you don't catch yourself and correct that then you're essentially being dishonest.

You're just trying to show off.

You're trying to pull one over their eyes.

There's a great book by Randall Monroe who is the creator of XKCD that very science -oriented comic and it's called Upgoer 5.

It's a reference of Saturn 5 rocket that took the Apollo missions into space and what he's doing in that book is he explains all these very complicated concepts all the way from climate change to physical systems to submarines and so on but he does it using only the thousand most common words in the English language.

So that's why he called the Saturn 5 rocket Upgoer 5 because it's called a rocket.

You can't define a rocket as a spaceship or a rocket.

It's just a preferential.

He says Upgoer. It's this thing that goes up and kids get that right away.

That's a thing explainer, right?

The book, I think? Oh, yeah.

I'm sorry. You're right that the name of the book is Thing Explainer.

Yeah, and Upgoer 5 is one of the pages.

There's another great book that I call Thinking Physics.

I open this one all the time and I love on the back cover.

It has this great little pitch.

It says the only book that's used in both grade school and graduate school.

And it's true. It's all simple physics puzzles that can be explained to a 12 -year -old child they can puzzle over and it can be explained to a 25 -year -old grad student in physics and they all kind of have fundamental insights in physics.

They're all kind of tricky, but anyone can get to the answer through purely logical reasoning.

I love reading the history of how scientists came up with their various breakthroughs.

And if you have ever gone like for example, relativity.

Relativity is a fascinating thing.

It's a very advanced concept, but in a way, it's very simple because Einstein came up with it with what are called Gedanken, fancy word for thought experiments.

This means thought experiment in German.

So he was able to basically just do logical thought experiments in his mind until he came up with relativity and then he formalized them with mathematics and with prediction.

That he made that were later unfalsified that were basically shown to be true.

So really brilliant physicists like that.

They get there by pure reasoning and pure logical reasoning.

It's not like he had to go draw lots of complicated diagrams and so on.

He just understood things at a very basic fundamental level.

So again, this goes back to I think the really smart thinkers are clear thinkers and they understand things at the understand the basics at a very very fundamental level.

And I would rather understand the basics really well than have memorized all kinds of complicated concepts that then I can't stitch together and I can't re -derive them from the basics.

If you can't re -derive it from the basics as you need it, you're lost.

You're just memorizing.

Yeah, exactly. It seems like a large part of making effective decisions kind of boils down to dealing with reality.

How do you make sure you're dealing with reality when you're making decisions?

By not having a strong sense of self or judgments or mind presence.

The monkey mind will always respond with this regurgitated emotional response to what it thinks the world should be and that will cloud your reality.

This happens a lot of times and people are mixing politics and business.

Like for example in January this year, I wrote like a little piece on the election that kind of predicted that Trump or Bernie is going to win.

One of those two characters going to win.

That's not what I wanted to have happen necessarily.

I'm an elite. My life is pretty good.

Right. I'm not looking for rabble rousers to change everything but I wanted to see a reality the way it was as opposed to the way I wanted it to be.

So I think the number one thing that clouds us from being able to see reality is just that we just have preconceived notions of the way it should be.

There's a one definition of a moment of suffering is that it's that moment when you see things exactly the way they are.

So this whole time you've been convinced your business is doing great and really ignored the science.

It's not doing that.

Well, then your business fails and you suffer.

Well, it's just because you've been putting off reality even hiding it from yourself.

So the good news is that when you're suffering when you're in pain, that's a moment of truth.

There's a moment where you're forced to embrace reality actually the way it is and then you can make meaningful change and progress because you can only make something you can only do that when you're starting with the truth.

So I think the hard thing here is seeing the truth and to see the truth, you have to get your ego out of the way because your ego doesn't want to face the truth.

So the smaller you can make your ego the less condition you can make your reactions.

The less desires you can have about the outcome you want the easier it is to see the reality.

The clear example of this is when we're going through difficult things like a breakup or a job loss or business failure or health problem and our friends are advising us, right?

Well, when we're advising them the answer is so obvious it comes to us in a minute and we tell them exactly.

Oh, that girl get over her.

She wasn't good for you.

Anyway, you'll be happier.

Trust me, you'll find someone you know, what the correct answer is, but that person can't see it because they're in that moment of suffering and pain and they're still wishing that reality was different.

So the problem is in reality, the problem is their desire colliding with reality.

It's preventing them from seeing the truth no matter how much you say it's the same thing happens when I'm making decisions the more of a desire that I have that it work out a certain way the less likely I am to see the truth.

So especially in business, if something isn't going well, I try to acknowledge that publicly and I try to acknowledge it publicly in front of my co -founders and friends and co -workers because that way then I'm not hiding it from anybody else.

If I'm not hiding it from anybody else, then I'm not going to basically delude myself and what's actually going on.

You won't said anything you can think of has been thought of and tried.

The only way you're going to find something is if you stick to it at an irrational level and try a whole bunch of things.

This kind of makes an idea a commodity, but the judgment and execution incredibly rare.

How do you evaluate if someone is picking the right idea and if they have the capacity to execute on that idea?

The best founders I found are the ones who are very long -term thinkers.

So even decisions that maybe they shouldn't care that much about early on they fix it on because they are not building a house.

They're putting bricks in the foundation of a skyscraper, at least in their minds.

And so what you're looking for is looking for someone who knows the space well who understands how difficult it's going to be but doesn't care because they just love whatever they're doing.

They're into it and they commit to it for the long haul.

So you know passion and vision alone are not enough.

I think Steve Case said that vision without execution is an hallucination.

Execution alone isn't enough and then unfortunately, at least in technology business, there's a lot of luck required.

Right place, right time, market forces, timing, regulatory action against or pro.

So there's a lot of things that we control where the platforms are shifting.

What open source efforts show up so you can never predict the outside successes, but what you can predict are the failures.

You can say, oh, this person doesn't know this field at all.

They're way out of their depth or this person.

They're a short -term thinker.

They're not going to last the game.

They're not going to go as far as needed because as I was saying, there are no new ideas.

All the ideas have been thought of but it's about the combination of the idea plus the execution plus the passion.

Like Steve Jobs was a visionary and a great designer not because he came with the idea to build a smartphone.

Many people had tried to build a smartphone, but it's because he had a very high bar for the design.

He understood the manufacturing tolerances and what the technology was capable and what it was and he could rally the people and the resources to get it done.

He actually didn't care about the financial outcome.

He took a dollar salary from Apple.

He just wanted to see it done and he was willing to do it for as long as it takes until it worked.

So it's kind of this magic concept factor and then the timing in the world happened to be right.

The technology was around and Johnny, I was there and who knows how many other factors intersect to make it happen, but just many factors intersected on his side.

There are ones that intersected against him.

You know, for example, it tickled Apple which was a horribly failing company at the time.

Poor guy died of pancreatic cancer.

He got taken out early.

Think about what more he could have created, what more he could have done for the world.

He probably wasn't happy in the whole process.

You know, he drove himself to ruin.

So I think you do have to be irrationally optimistic to succeed and passionate, but you also have to really know your stuff and I meet a lot of entrepreneurs while they're short -term thinkers, in which case that's okay.

It just means this is not the thing for you.

Go find the thing you can commit to for 10 years because that's how long it's going to take minimum to get a good outcome and you have to enjoy the journey because there's no guarantee on the outcome and you have to be really really good at it, which means that you probably love it so much that you will not put in the time

before there's even any return on it.

So I think the best founders, they have a deep understanding of the space they're going into enough to be contrarian and they have a deep passion for it so that they'll just keep working on it and they have execution skills.

They just get things done.

They solve problems.

They're capable. I love that.

I don't get to invest with angel founders, but we all deal with people with similar business or life if we're establishing a partnership, whether it's with a customer or supplier, a relationship, we have similar concerns about their short -term thinking and will take advantage of us and how should we

go about entering that relationship and is this relationship fragile?

I think that's a good way to think about it.

One thing I figured out kind of late is that generally at least in the tech business in Silicon Valley, great people have great outcomes.

You just have to be patient.

Every person that I met at the beginning of my career 20 years ago where I looked at it and said, wow, that guy or that gal is super capable.

They're so smart and dedicated and blah blah blah.

Not we'll just be friends or hang out or whatever, kind of forgot about them.

All of them almost without exception became extremely successful.

You just had to give them a long enough time scale.

It never happens in a time scale you want or they want, but it does happen.

I want to circle back and ask you a few more questions about life before we wrap up.

You've kind of called your philosophy rational Buddhism.

How does that differ from traditional Buddhism and what type of exploration did you go through to arrive at that?

Yeah, the rational part means that I have to reconcile with science and evolution.

So I have to reject all the pieces that I can't verify for myself.

So for example, is meditation good for you?

Yes. Is clearing your mind a good thing?

Yes. Is there a base layer of awareness kind of below your monkey mind?

Yes, all these things I verified for myself and some of the beliefs that come out of Buddhism.

I believe and follow because again, I've verified or reasoned with thought experiments there myself.

But what I will not accept is things that are written down is just so like oh you're this and there's a past life that you're paying off the car before or I haven't seen it.

I don't remember any past lives.

I don't have any memory.

So I just have to not believe that or when people say, you know, your third chakra is opening and your second chakra is, I don't know, this is fancy nomenclature, right?

I have not been able to verify or confirm any of that on my own.

So if I can't verify it on my own or if I cannot get there through science, then I just then it may be true.

It may be false, but it's not falsifiable so I cannot view it as a fundamental truth.

On the other side, I do know that evolution is true.

I do know that we are, you know, evolved survival and replication machines.

I do know that we have an ego so that we get up off the ground and worms don't eat us.

We actually take action.

So what rational Buddha to me means understanding the internal work that Buddhism espouses to make yourself happier and better off and more present and more in control of your emotions and being a better human being.

But I don't subscribe to anything fanciful just because it was written down in the book.

I don't think I can levitate.

I don't think that meditation is going to give me superpowers and those kinds of things.

So it's, you know, it's basically try everything test it for yourself be skeptical, keep what's useful and discard what's not.

So I would say my philosophy falls down to an on one pole is evolution as a binding principle because it explains so much about humans and the other side is Buddhism, which is the oldest, most time -tested spiritual philosophy on the internal state of being inside each of us.

And I think those are absolutely reconcilable.

I actually want to write a blog post at some point about how you can map the tenets of Buddhism, especially the non fanciful ones directly into a virtual reality simulation.

What I mean by that is if you believe we're living in a VR sim, which I know some people are espousing or if you believe the Buddhist view of the world with Samsara and Nirvana and all that you would actually come to the same conclusions on how to live your life.

What are the areas of your life right now that you'd like to change the most and why?

I would like to be less, I'd like to be less time -bound.

I like to be less greedy about signing up for things.

I don't know how to describe this.

You know what it really is.

I had a tweet recently where I was going back and forth with somebody and then came over this concept of there should be a two -factor authentication on your calendar.

Exactly, it's a two -factor authentication when you're logging into a website that if your password gets stolen, the attacker doesn't, the thief or hacker doesn't have your phone, so they can't log in because the phone has to generate a unique code.

Well, I wish there was a two -factor code against my calendar because currently, present me is always making promises for future me.

Current me is tired, exhausted, hungry, wants to go home, must go to sleep, wants to read a book, wants to hang out with the wife and baby, but future me is this dynamic high -energy individual who will always show up to every meeting and will have a lot of energy and will want to get a lot of things

done. So I commit myself to all these commitments in the future that when the future me arrives, actually this present me, I expect to be lazy and hungry and tired.

So I want a two -factor against myself and the way I would like to do that is I think every time I make a commitment to anything, I should instead just write it down and then check back in 48 hours later and then clear my and say do I commit to doing this or even better would be saying if I commit doing

something that I commit to doing it right now.

Yeah, I think if I'm not going to do it right now, then don't do it.

Don't commit to it.

Yeah, that's the Derek Sivers approach, right?

Like if you're not saying hell yes right now, then you should just be saying no, I think.

Yeah, so I think this is this is something of every busy person.

I just want to be much better at managing my own time because you go through life through an exploration phase and then you switch to an exploitation phase and I'm very much in the exploitation phase not looking for more exploration.

But that all that said, I have a hard time saying no, if I mean if I had one wish the most important thing to me would be I would constantly be running my mind in debug mode.

I would literally be watching every single thought I have and letting no, no reaction pass without it being stopped inspected stripped searched examined understood and then like though but the reality that is a lot of time and we're just highly conditioned creature.

So I do view a lot of my goals over the next few years of unconditioning previous learned responses or habituated responses so that I can make decisions more cleanly in the moment without relying upon memory or or prepackaged heuristics and judgments.

What's the most common mistake you see people make over and over?

I think the most common I mean, this is a very tough question because it's so contextual.

Right. It really depends on the context.

I think the most common mistake if I look at out there in on planet Earth like for humanity is the idea or the belief that you're going to be made happy because of some external circumstance and I know that's not original.

That's not new. That's fundamental Buddhist wisdom.

So I'm not taking credit for it.

But I think I really just recognize it now the fundamental level including in myself like we just bought a new car.

We have a baby. So we need a safer car.

We were driving a little Mini Cooper before not enough room in there.

So we bought a new car and now waiting for the new car to arrive in a course every night.

I'm on the forums reading about the car.

Why am I doing that is silly object, silly car.

It's not going to change my life that much or at all.

And I know that the instant the car arrives, I won't care about it anymore.

But what it is is that I'm addicted to the desiring.

I'm addicted to the idea that this external thing is going to bring me some kind of happiness and joy and that's just completely delusional.

So I think just looking outside for anything.

I think is the fundamental delusion.

Which is not to say you shouldn't do things in the outside.

You absolutely should.

You're a living creature.

You know, there are things that you do, you locally reverse entropy.

That's why you're here.

You're meant to do something.

You're not just meant to lie there in the sand and meditate all day long.

So you should self actualize and you should do what you're meant to do.

But the idea that you're going to change something in the outside world that is going to bring you the peace and everlasting joy and the happiness that you deserve.

That is a fundamental delusion that we all suffer from including me.

And so the mistake over and over and over is to say, oh, I'll be happy when I get that thing.

Whatever that is. That's the fundamental mistake that we all make including me 24 seven all day long.

I definitely see myself from that answer.

Because you're human.

You're human. All of us do it.

I want to end with a really unbounded big question, which is what is the meaning and purpose of life?

Yeah, it's a big question.

I'll give you three and this is a big question.

I'll give you three answers.

One is this personal you have to find your own meaning any piece of wisdom that anybody else gives you whether it's Buddha or you or me is going to sound like nonsense.

So I think fundamentally you just have to find for yourself.

So the important part is not the answer.

It's the question you have to sit there and dig with the question that it might take you years or decades.

But when you find an answer you're happy with that will be fundamental to your life.

The second answer I would give is there is no meaning to life.

There's no purpose to life.

Osho says it's like writing on water or building houses and sand.

The reality is you've been dead for the history of the universe where 10 billion years or more you will be dead for the next 70 billion years or so until they eat that the universe and anything you do will fade.

It will disappear. Just like the human race will disappear.

The planet will disappear.

Get to Mars even even that group will disappear.

So no one's going to remember you pass a certain number of generations whether you're an artist or a poet or a conqueror or a pauper or nothing.

So there's no meaning.

So you have to create your own meaning which is what it boils down to.

You have to decide is this a play that I'm going to do that I'm just watching.

Is there a self actualization dance that I'm doing?

Is there a specific thing that I just desire just for the heck of it?

But these are all meanings you are making up.

There's no fundamental intrinsic purposeful meaning to the universe because if there was then you would just ask the next question yourself.

Well, why is that the meaning?

Right? So it would just be as Richard Feynman said it'd be turtles all the way down.

The why's would just keep accumulating.

There is no answer you can give that question that wouldn't have another why and I don't buy the everlasting afterlife answers because it's insane to me with absolutely no evidence to believe that because of how you live 70 years here on this planet that you're going to spend an eternity which is a very

long time in some afterlife.

What kind of silly God judges you for eternity based on some small period of time here?

So I think that after this life, it's very much like before you were born.

Remember that it's going to be just like that and and but before you were born you didn't care about anything or anyone including your loved ones including yourself including humans including whether we go to Mars or whether we stay on planet Earth and whether there's an AI or not.

You just don't care.

So like I met this entrepreneur who was obsessed with Steve Jobs and he was making all these sacrifice try and be like the next Steve Jobs and I said, Tim, do you want to be exactly like Steve Jobs right now?

He said yes. And I said, well Steve Jobs is dead.

He doesn't care about anything.

You're gone like zero.

He's not registering at all.

So if you want to be like Steve Jobs, you don't want to be like Steve Jobs just be you right now.

He would trade places with you right now in an instant if he could.

So I don't think there's any real meaning or purpose to life.

And then the last answer I'll give you is a little more complicated than that from what I've been reading in science.

Friends of mine have written books on this and kind of stitched together some theories and maybe there is a meaningful life, but it's not a very satisfying purpose.

Basically in physics, you know, the arrow of time comes from entropy.

Second law of thermodynamics says that entropy only goes up which means disorder in the universe only goes up which means concentrated free energy only goes down.

And if you look at what living things are living systems, humans, plants, civilizations, what have you they these are systems that are locally reversing entropy humans locally reverse entropy because we have action but in the process we globally accelerate entropy until the heat death the universe.

So you could come up with some fanciful theory which I had which I like that we're headed towards the heat death the universe where there's no concentrated energy where everything is sort of at the same energy level and therefore we're all one thing.

We're essentially indistinguishable and what we are doing as living systems is we're accelerating getting to that state.

So the more complex of a system you create whether through computers and civilization or through art and mathematics or just through creating a family.

You're actually accelerating the heat death the universe.

So you're pushing us towards this point where we end up as one thing but I think that's the kind of an unsatisfying answer if you're looking for personal meaning today in your life.

That was phenomenal.

Listen about thank you so much.

This was just absolutely mind blowing.

I really appreciate it.

Where can people find you Twitter at naval or on my blog at startup boy dot com.

Thank you so much. Thank you.

It's been great. Hey guys, this is Shane again.

Just a few more things before we wrap up.

You can find show notes at Fernum Street blog dot com slash podcast that's f a r n a m s t r e e t b l o g dot com slash podcast.

You can also find information there on how to get a transcript and if you'd like to receive a weekly email from me filled with all sorts of brain food go to Fernum Street blog dot com slash newsletter.

This is all the good stuff.

I found on the web that week that I've read and shared with close friends books.

I'm reading and so much more.

Thank you for listening.

[나발 라비칸트: 행복, 습관, 그리고 인생의 본질에 관한 통찰]-[#18 Naval Ravikant: The Angel Philosopher]

📋 Summary

나발 라비칸트의 인생 전략: 본질에 집중하기

1. 독서와 배움의 기술

2. 습관과 자기 조건화의 해제

3. '원숭이 마음(Monkey Mind)'과 행복

4. 의사결정과 가치관

결론: 인생은 싱글 플레이어 게임

🎯Key Sentences

📝Key Phrases

📖 Transcript