What happens after coding is solved? | Fiona Fung (Manager of the Claude Code and Cowork Teams) | Lenny's Podcast: Product | Career | Growth

Anthropic engineers on average have eight times as much code per quarter as they did compared to 2025.

Coding is no longer the bottleneck.

It's left at the ceiling of what anyone is able to do.

Everything is now possible in theory.

Now it's about how ambitious can you be?

It's always something we ask ourselves, what's better than me doing it?

I haven't thought, David.

The people that seem to be doing best are taking the most initiative, getting the most proactive, have the most agency.

We say with high agency is also high accountability.

So it's all about making sure folks have that freedom to cook.

But then it's also like, okay, what's the accountability for it?

What's the hypothesis of what you're trying to solve?

I'm curious what is lost in this new world of software engineering.

Start being a lonely experience because we all started just working with our agents so much.

And on the Clock Code team recently, we started a pairwise programming lunch.

Something you think about is this gap forming between people that are leaning into AI, killing it, and then people that are not.

Super frustrated, fighting, resisting.

In terms of frustration, I think sometimes I also see a little bit of fear.

For anything that there is a fear, my advice is lean in and ask, what can I do about it?

What is within my control?

Today, my guest is Fiona Fung.

Fiona leads the teams behind Claude Code and co-work at Anthropic.

She oversees both Boris Cherny and Kat Wu, both of whom who have been on the podcast and whose episodes are in the top 10 most listened to episodes of all time.

Before Anthropic at Microsoft, Fiona ran the teams that built TypeScript and Visual Studio.

After that, she went to Facebook, where she started the Facebook Marketplace team, which she took from idea to launch.

Today, Facebook Marketplace generates over $100 billion in GMV every year.

Also while at Meta, she oversaw work on Meta's first smart glasses product, and then she helped build Orion, their first AR glasses product.

Then she went to Instagram, where she led infrastructure, growth, integrity, and safety teams.

While at Instagram and at Meta, she oversaw an org of over 500 people.

Fiona has been an engineer for over 25 years and as a long-time engineering leader, especially now at Anthropic, she has such a unique lens into where things are heading, what's worth paying attention to, and what teams should be thinking about right now as AI transforms the world of building.

A huge thank you to Kat Wu, Boris Cherny, and Mohamed Hegazi for suggesting topics and questions for this conversation.

Before we get into it, don't forget to check out lenny'sproductpass.com for a free year of the hottest and most well-crafted AI products in the world, available exclusively to Lenny's Newsletter subscribers.

With that, I bring you Fiona Fung.

Fiona, thank you so much for being here.

Welcome to the podcast.

Thanks so much for having me, Lenny.

So I was at the Code with Claude event, I don't know, a month ago at this point, and I went to your talk.

And I was just like, holy shit, I got to get Fiona on this podcast.

She's thinking so far ahead of where everybody else is going and where people are at with AI.

So you've been an engineer for 25 years.

I was browsing your LinkedIn.

You started at IBM of all places.

Such a different place to be these days.

And it's just...

Insane how much the job of an engineer has changed over the past just like two years.

It's like a completely different job.

Like people may forget 100% of code was written by humans not long ago.

And now it's getting to 100% of code written by AI.

As Boris famously said, coding is solved.

Along these lines,

There's just this tweet that you guys put out yesterday where you showed, here's the tweet, anthropic engineers on average ship eight times as much code per quarter as they did compared to 21 to 2025.

We'll show this chart on the screen.

It's just like stable, stable, stable, stable, shooting off into the moon.

So it's just insane how much this role has changed.

I'm curious about your kind of path as an engineer living through this, having been an engineer for a long time.

What have been kind of like the big moments along the way where it's shifted your way of thinking and operating that have led you to what you do now and how you operate now?

Oh, I love this kind of walk back in time.

Yeah, like IBM working on DB2, the operating system services team.

Like back then I was thinking, oh, how can I be like the – like what's a hard area of the stack?

And I really thought the lower level you go closer to the OS, then it's like more hardcore and you –

You'll learn more.

So that was I was really fortunate to gotten into the IBM internship.

But the funny thing was, I would I think there's even a big shift from IBM to Microsoft.

So at IBM, it was I think Vim, like I didn't have an IDE that we use.

I think there might have been.

And Eclipse license, but for some reasons, most of us didn't use it.

So I remembered it was mainly like Vim and, you know, like kind of terminal debugging.

And then when I joined Microsoft, I mean, this is how naive I was.

I didn't even know about IDEs and such.

And back then you didn't really get to pick teams like this was early 2000s.

Actually, first off, I should say I was so grateful that I landed the internship and the role because to take us all the way back in time, the dot-com bubble burst in 2000.

And so for my graduating class, like a lot of the companies,

Weren't hiring and were having freezes.

So I was so fortunate when Microsoft extended me an offer.

And so they're like, you're going to work on Visual Studio.

I did not even know what Visual Studio was because I came from like a Unix school.

So I remember asking, oh, because I was thinking about the name Visual Studio.

I'm like, oh, is this like a better paint program?

And I could tell the look on my manager's face, like, what is going on?

But then it ended up becoming the love of my life for the first 11 years of my career.

But that was the first time I used an IDE.

So joining the Visual Studio team, seeing, oh, wow, here's an IDE with debuggers and you can set breakpoints and do multi-threaded debugging.

That was also always mind-blowing for me to think about the stepwise change.

So yeah, like that was kind of the story going from IBM to Visual Studio.

And then what I really loved actually about Visual Studio is I was on the Visual Studio editor team.

So I use a VS editor to build the VS editor.

And that's where my whole love of dog feeding comes from.

Like, I remembered I wanted to first and foremost create a delightful experience not only for myself, but for my teammates.

Because also, if we go back in that time, if you remember, I mean, when did Twitter come out?

Like, was it 2006 or something?

Feels like it's been around my whole life.

Like before social media, it was also harder for most engineers to hear fast customer feedback.

Like for sure there would be user research sessions or we would have customers visit us.

But you didn't get the rapid feedback that you do nowadays.

But back then I was so lucky because I was on VS. We ourselves gave each other so much rapid feedback because we were all heavy VS users on the team.

This episode is brought to you by our season's presenting sponsor, WorkOS.

What do OpenAI, Anthropic, Cursor, Vercel, Replit, Sierra, Clay, and hundreds of other winning companies all have in common?

They are all powered by WorkOS.

If you're building a product for the enterprise, you've felt the pain of integrating single sign-on, skim, RBAC, audit logs, and other features required by large companies.

WorkOS turns those deal blockers into drop-in APIs with a modern developer platform built specifically for B2B SaaS.

Literally every startup that I'm an investor in that starts to expand upmarket ends up working with WorkOS.

And that's because they are the best.

Whether you are a seed stage startup trying to land your first enterprise customer or a unicorn expanding globally, WorkOS is the fastest path to becoming enterprise ready and unblocking growth.

WorkOS allows you to build faster with delightful APIs, comprehensive docs, and a smooth developer experience.

Go to WorkOS.com to make your app enterprise-ready today.

People think about these milestones along the way of an engineer's journey, and we forget there's been a lot of transformation over the years.

Not quite what we're living through, but just like IDEs, Visual Studio.

So I love that you're reminding us of these moments in the history of software engineering that have changed the work in a big way.

Yeah, when I worked on Visual Studio.

Back then, we also shipped software on CDs.

And that's why there were really hard deadlines because you had to make sure the software was ready for us to give to manufacturing to then put on the CDs for us to then put on the shelves.

And then so once that was another shift when we actually started to be able to, you know, ship software online.

And I think that's the interesting thing.

And I kind of mentioned this in my talk.

It's before when you like.

Engineering time was like like really precious resource but you also have these really hard deadlines for example like printing software and cds and so back then you would do a lot more planning because you just wanted to make sure given the time you have you you make the best of it and that's the shift that you know like we're seeing with with uh cloud code and co-work is

Well, coding is no longer the bottleneck.

And so now you showed the tweet and that graphic.

But now it's all about where has that shift happened?

Now, not only engineers, we also have designers, PMs, everybody on the Cloud Code team checks in code.

So like when not only more people checking in code, but like kind of different disciplines, but also the throughput is so high.

How do we think about verification?

Like that's kind of this other shift that I'm seeing.

Maybe just kind of set this theme that I want to have for this conversation.

A lot of people are just wondering, what does software engineering, managing software engineers, managing software and product teams look like in the future?

And you are living through that right now.

So you mentioned this point about more focus on verification, making sure the quality of the code being...

8x is actually high and something that will work.

So just let me ask this broad question.

Let's kind of see where this conversation goes.

What does an AI-pilled software team look like in 2026?

Because the roles are blowing, it's shifting more to this builder.

Like everybody starts being a builder, I would say.

The other shift that I've recently done is I actually have a cloud code remote session that I enlist in all of our repos.

And so this way I have full visibility into the work that everybody's doing.

And this instance, it also has access to all our Slack channels and I'll have access to, like, how are the metrics of everything we track.

And so every month, like, when, like, I'll be like, hey, you know what's fun?

Like, let's take a look back.

Like, and so we'll actually do it together.

I'll share my, you know, like, cloud code, you know, I'll share my screen and we do our cloud code.

And it's just about, hey, what were the focus areas?

Like what were some of the products that got shipped?

How did it do?

Oh, what were the feedback channels?

And so I, even though like before I would have just used these sessions to like generate PRs and bug fixes, I actually have these sessions to enable me to have conversations with folks that I support.

Say more about that.

So this is like a management technique, let's say, to help people not just ship, but actually ship better, understand if they're shipping things that have impact.

Is that kind of the idea here?

Just like use Claw to keep on top of all the things people are shipping and then make that a conversation with them?

Exactly.

So outside of just, you know, the action of shipping is how did it do in market?

Or, hey, did we have, you know, like, did we cause some bugs?

And it's okay to, like, I have the saying, make new mistakes.

Like, it's okay to make mistakes, just make new ones so that we're always learning.

Because if you aim to make zero mistakes, like that probably means you're not, you know,

Moving fast enough or being a little bit too cautious.

And so, yeah, by having cloud, like, so then they can also look at, like, for example,

Actually, yeah, I was just looking at, oh, you know, given some of the, you know, incidents that we have, like, let's look across all of this.

Can we generate a theme?

Like, what's a good area investment for us next?

Especially we think about, like,

Like, are we seeing any hotspots of where there could be a gap?

I think that used to be just a much more manual process, I would say.

Like, if I look back a year ago, I don't think I would have been able to, you know, have some of these insights with Claude.

Yeah, well, partly it's because there's that, and also people weren't shipping as much, so you could just make a little bullet list.

Here's the things I shipped last quarter, this feature, that feature, this feature, that feature.

That's right.

So I think what I'm hearing here is this is one of the only ways to stay on top of all the things a teammate is shipping.

So this is a really cool thread of just like how you found ways to stay on top of this 8x increase in code.

What else has worked in helping you and your team stay on top of and maintain quality of all the stuff that y'all are shipping?

Because that's obviously a challenge, a bigger challenge.

Yeah.

And so definitely like the feedback channels are really important to us, but then we also get a lot of feedback.

And like, for example, even I myself, usually what my morning ritual would be,

You know, I get my morning cup of coffee and then I look at the feedback channels and then I try to pick out what are, you know, if I have some maker time, what's something that maybe...

I would be able to help out or what I could like see some gaps like that just used to be something I would do every morning.

And I think maybe a month or two ago, we launched routines.

And that's also completely changed.

Like now I just have a routine that automates all this for me.

And then there's also it's almost like before I would, you know, be able to kind of like, you know, generate some prompts.

But now with routines, it's almost like I'm

Having an agent help me generate the prompt and the PR.

So for example, one is, hey, keep a look on this feedback channel.

What are some of the themes?

And then when I wake up, then I have a really good summary of that.

And then even some PRs that I'll be able to take a look and review.

And the feedback channel, where's that feedback coming from?

Is that like emails, Twitter, or a combo of everything?

Our feedback channels are definitely like we have a lot from internal ads, but also like emails, channels.

Actually, everybody, like when we all get feedback on even like when friends ping us or on LinkedIn or socials,

We'll all actually post all of that in Slack as well.

And we also have, of course, partnerships.

And so we have different channels for all the various sources.

But that's what I mean.

I need Claude's help to help me stay on top because there is so much incoming feedback.

Got it.

Okay, so this is cool.

So this is like a way of working that you've built to stay on top of all the stuff shipping, which is this kind of daily ritual slash routine where you, as a manager, look at what people are saying about the current state of cloud code and co-work and used to just like, okay, someone go fix this, go fix that.

Now it's like...

Here's the PR that'll fix this thing.

Check it out.

We're ready to ship it if you want.

Awesome.

Okay.

Like obviously a big challenge for people is also just code review.

I imagine Clot is also doing a lot of its own code review.

Is there anything there you've recently figured out that allows your teams to ship faster stuff that they are confident is great?

Yeah, and honestly, it's crazy when you think we didn't even have cloud code reviews last year.

And so speak of bottlenecks, that was a really, really big bottleneck of, you know, the human reviewers.

So we definitely, for the important, like...

Areas that need deep subject matter expertise.

We definitely want to make sure we have the proper, you know, like humans still reviewing.

I would say what helps us though is the more that we can automate to almost check in the framework for what good looks like.

Cloud is very good when you give it a framework to validate against those frameworks.

So I had mentioned like, you know, or like, you know, like recently we just updated like content design to, to have a skill in it.

Like my, like I, and this is why like, I think if you have specs or like, or like, like check those into the repo and then make sure the spec also keeps up to date with the code like frequently.

But that's what I found like works really well of any,

Time you have like a statement of what good looks like, get that into the repo and then Code Review can make sure it's still matching what you set up to do.

Basically, it's like the evolution of test-driven development.

Yes.

For TDD, it's because I remember that was like a big thing.

My gosh, maybe like in the 2000s of write the test first and then and then you can like make sure the test fails.

Then you do actually the code in principle is really good.

But I think I know I remembered I myself struggling a bit because it was almost like you have to eat the broccoli first because I was like,

Oh, you have to write this test first.

And I just get so much thrill out of shipping and building product.

So it's funny.

Actually, the first bug I fixed on Cloud Code, I remember asking Cloud, hey, I want to do test-driven development.

Help me write the test first.

Make sure it fails.

And then we'll actually do the fix.

And then now the test passed.

And

The fact that that used to be, you know, like that test generation used to just be this tax that I remember having to pay, like the fact that that's not automated.

And you can even revisit all these principles that have been around for a while, but now they actually might be even more efficient just because you have the models that can do more of the work for you.

Yeah, like that's so unfair.

It's just right to test for you first.

So on this point of builders, one of my favorite slides from your talk that I want to ask you about is

Who you are hiring and what you look for in people.

And so I'll read what you said there, and I want to hear more here.

So the two profiles that you now look for when you're hiring are creative builders with Product Sense and deep systems experts for the hard parts.

Yeah, the deep subject matter expertise.

Like, for example, when I first joined Cloud Code, we had really great kind of like product generalists.

And then I realized, oh, we were missing folks with systems background.

And so that was definitely an area that we needed more folks with kind of like.

Systems and distributed systems expertise.

And so I would say whatever are the parts that, it's all about trust but verify.

The models are really good, but there are definitely a lot of areas that still need the verification.

And so wherever you need the deep subject matter expertise, I would say that's an area to definitely still invest in.

And the other one is kind of like the product, the product sense books, almost like the dreamers.

Like these are folks that usually will be like, my gosh, you're really passionate about a product and they have an idea, they build it.

And then it's always like looking at the feedback and then iterating and polishing and making sure that the product.

It's a delightful experience like owning that product end to end.

That's that's like another skill set that served us really well on CloudCode.

This super resonates.

There's this word ambition.

I don't know if you used it, but that's what I thought of as you're talking.

That's been coming up a bunch recently in the podcast and other work I've been doing.

There's this 10XC engineer I was talking to the other day, and he was just like, I used to, like, I heard about a feature idea.

Like, someone's like, hey, we should build this.

And I was like, no, that's really hard and complicated.

And he's like, but now I'm like, no, no, that's so possible.

I just ask Cloud Code to do it.

And it just does it.

Yeah.

And it's this whole mindset shift.

And he's just realizing now it's about how ambitious can you be?

Like everything is now possible in theory.

Now it's about how ambitious and how big can you think versus just like, okay, it's all these stupid little features and things they have to unblock.

Does that resonate?

Is that something that you think about?

Yes, actually, I was just catching up with an engineer yesterday, and he actually is not a mobile engineer by trade, but we really needed to update this feature to also have a mobile footprint.

And it was just amazing.

Like he's like, you know what?

And it's common because you might think, wait, but I don't, I'm not like an Android expert.

But now thanks to Claude, actually, I can actually have a partner and actually also do this on the mobile surfaces.

And so that definitely resonates.

It's like it's left at the ceiling of what anyone is able to do.

So let me follow that thread.

As the role has transformed in such a crazy way, some people are thriving, some people super frustrated, unhappy, fighting, resisting.

What do you see common across the people that are doing really well, the engineers that have adapted and are thriving versus the engineers and even outside engineering that are just like frustrated and having a bad time?

I would say a growth mindset really, really helps.

Actually, even before AI tooling, I found that has been just so valuable.

And I learned that a lot.

Actually, it was the shift from...

Microsoft to Meta.

That was where I first, that first year I'm like, oh, this is what having a growth mindset really means.

It's really this concept of always be learning.

Also what served you to get you to this point may not, may serve you no longer.

But it's really hard because of course everybody, like we all, you know,

We've all gotten to the state by acting or, you know, like operating in a certain way.

And so sometimes it is a little bit scary to think, wait, you're like, but I've been successful so far.

You're asking me to change what has made me successful.

And so I would say like the growth mindset is really, really has really served me well.

And I think it's also served

Others that I notice like always leaning in with curiosity and always being able to learn.

And then in terms of like the frustration, I think sometimes I also see a little bit of fear sometimes.

And so my advice there is, at least this is how just in life I've, because we all have, and fear is of course an evolutionary, like I didn't study anthropology, but I think it, you know, it makes sense, right?

It helps us make sure we were able to survive and not get eaten and, you know, by larger predators.

Um but for anything that you know that that there is a fear my advice is kind of lean in and ask okay is there some

What can i do about it

What is within my control

Because sometimes the frustration comes from fear and feeling like but everything is outside of my control and so it's happening to me

And so if you think about okay what is in your control um

Instead of happening to you, is it happening for you?

And then what's something that you might be able to kind of like do and change?

Like I felt that's been helpful because if not, it is super frustrating to have the fear and then feeling like,

Everything's outside of your control.

Like I actually remembered when I was in, actually when I was in high, it's funny when we were going back to IBM, when I was in high school, I actually didn't go into computer science or engineering.

Like

I really wanted to be a visual artist.

And this is how far back we go.

Back then, computers were really expensive.

So I actually didn't even have access to a computer.

My first access to a computer was grade nine, I think, in high school.

I don't even know if this happens in high school anymore.

My high school had a typing class.

Where you attend class just to learn how to type on the keyboard and learn to be really proficient.

And that was my first time.

And then, you know, the next class was maybe like some HTML programming.

So anyways, but the reason why I fell in love with it was why what I love about art is creating and being able if you have an idea,

You can go ahead and create and tell a story.

And then I realized, oh, computers and programming, you know, that enables me to do that.

So anyways, I tried to really fast try to make up for all the, you know, science classes for me to get into university.

But I had this fear of, oh, but how will I afford to get into an engineering school?

And it was this big unknown.

I grew up in Ontario, so I was very grateful.

I knew there was an Ontario, you know, school assistance program, OSAP, I think it's called, which I'm very grateful for.

But I didn't know how much of that would cover my tuition or like expenses.

And it was just this unknown and it would be like a year, a year out.

And I remember thinking, okay, what can I do about it?

And then as luck would have it, the National Bank of Canada just posted this flyer in our high school saying, hey, we're hiring high school interns to be a bank teller.

And I remember, oh, that like, and of course it was going to be minimum wage, but I thought that that could be a lifeline.

But it was funny because the class I hated the most in high school was accounting.

So I don't know if I'd be any good at it at all.

But I signed up to be a bank teller and that ended up being such a great decision because I worked all summer, saved up.

And then actually I was able to work as a bank teller on the weekends.

So like, yeah, well, I went to, I would go to school Monday to Friday and then I'm tired to be a bank teller.

And that ended up being this lifeline that enabled me to, you know, like pay for all my school expenses, um,

And, you know, we talked about the year 2000 dot-com crash.

Then when folks weren't hiring as much interns, actually, I continued being a bank teller for two years.

And so, but...

But that was the one action I felt I could take that was within my control to try to counter this fear I have of if I'm really going to go down this path, I don't even know if I could afford to go to school.

So that's probably my other advice of growth mindset and the source of frustration or anxiety.

If it's coming from, you know, the like, see, is there some

Is there one action that's within your control that you can take to, you know, so it like because I think there's, you know, there was a saying like do something.

What would you do if you're not afraid?

Actually, those were my two favorite things before.

Like, what would you do if you're not afraid and do something scary once in a while?

Because that's also usually how we grow.

I found that when you're really good and professional at what you do, you're kind of at peak, you know, like maximum efficiency.

But then how do you keep growing is you then do something scary that you might not have done before.

And yeah, you will have a dip because you need to learn.

But that's kind of how you keep pushing yourself to learn.

The quote that I have probably used the most on this podcast of all quotes is the cave you fear contains the treasure you seek.

Oh, I love that.

And it's so true.

Just like like I forget who put this, but just the thing that is scariest is like that's a compass towards that's what you should be doing.

I'm going to steal your quote.

Please do.

Don't do all the scary things.

Maybe don't drip off a cliff.

But maybe in career moves, it's probably a good choice.

So kind of following this path, something that...

I know that is important to you.

Something you think about that I also think about is this kind of gap that is forming between people that are just like leaning into AI, killing it, doing super well, and then people that are just like not.

And this is like a scary time for people that may be left behind in this new world that is emerging.

I know you spend a lot of time with small businesses.

That's a big passion of yours to help people learn how to use AI in their work.

Talk about just like how you think about that and what maybe we should be thinking about to help folks, you know, stay, not fall behind, basically.

Oh, I love this.

Yeah, it's one of my passion topics because I kind of mentioned, you know, like growing up in Canada.

And I moved there when I was a kid.

I was born in Hong Kong.

So I didn't speak any English and my parents had to work all the time.

So my grandma, who is the best grandmother anyone could have ever asked for.

I know everybody thinks their grandma's the best, but I really was so lucky I had the best grandma.

She moved with us just to take care of me while my parents were working.

But neither of us spoke English, but I was able to learn how to speak English by going to school and speaking with classmates.

And when I think about my grandma, it was very alienating for her to be in that new country where

And back then, it wasn't as walkable.

But one summer, I remember we just happened to find this little yarn shop that was owned by a lady that also spoke Cantonese.

And so that became every week we would go to this yarn shop this summer.

My grandma found her knitting circle.

And then I think I learned how to do like macrame, which I think is having a comeback, by the way.

It's always funny to see.

Macrame coming back.

Macrame i think

Yeah harry did here first on lenny's podcast

I think macrame is coming though

All right um but but that was probably where my love came from

I'm like oh wow this little small business created this wonderful sense of community

I've been really fortunate to become friends with all the small businesses that I love.

That's kind of where the passion comes from.

How it happened was I was using Cowork for my own business expensing travel.

I don't know what it is.

I really don't like doing business expensing.

When I was using Cowork, it was magic.

I'm like, wow.

All these things that I don't like to do, like co-work is doing for me.

And I'm like, wait a minute, all my friends and honestly, small business owners, they really bust their butt.

Like they work incredibly hard.

And they're usually, you know, like sometimes might be operating on really small margins.

And so I thought, if Claude Cowork is so good at helping me do my little, you know, business travel expense, this would be huge for it.

Because I see my friends sometimes sitting at the bar with stacks of bills and all they're doing is invoicing and expensing.

And I think nobody actually really likes to do it.

So that's kind of where it came from.

And then so, yeah, I remembered that.

Helping a couple of them onboard.

And it was also very humbling to see them go through our onboarding flow.

Actually, it found some really good bugs.

So it was really like a win-win.

But it was also delightful for me because they also use coworking in ways that I

I wouldn't have thought about because I was all fixated on look at how it is amazing with PDFs and invoice.

And then, you know, one of my friends who who runs two restaurants, she's like, oh, my gosh, this folder I have is like a junk drawer of like it's basically our, you know, documents folder

Just becomes this junk drawer of every or downloads like just, you know, like the kitchen junk drawer.

And she's like, I know I have a few menus in here and I can't find it.

And I'm like, well, let's ask her work.

So we gave co-work access to the directory, found the menus.

And then she's in a really unique way.

She goes, like, I want to make sure I keep my prices reasonable for locals and tourists.

So she goes, hey, Claude, look across my style of cuisine in this area.

Is it comparable?

And it came back with really cool, almost like market analysis.

And she goes, hey, I actually just went to that restaurant in Seattle and that was pretty good.

So I learn something every time.

And yeah, they've been giving me great feedback as well.

So the question then is just like, how do we, how do we spread this to everybody?

Because as you see, you know, there's like, like a lot of people are just like, I don't have time for this or I hate AI.

It's just like, I want to ignore it.

Is it like talking?

Is it just talking about these sharing examples?

What do you think?

What's like a way to make a dent in this, in this problem?

For all of us, especially to your listeners are probably very AI pilled.

If there's anyone either in their community or their family that has like, I would start with what has something that really you felt has, that you really have felt has made a meaningful life change?

For you with with the ai tools and then seeing if that is a conversation starter for because for me ai is a tool

Again it's the whole light and the dark

I totally understand the frustrating part as well but for me i'm also about like knowledge is power like have to learn how to use the tools because it could actually you know be the light part of that light and dark equation

So

I think that's something that I would love everybody's help with, whether it's a community member or even if there's a business you really like and you think, hey, have you ever

– it's a little awkward to start.

Like I remember when I first reached out to my friends, I'm like – because I don't talk about what I do –

Uh, with them a lot, but I'm like, Hey, I kind of, you know, where can I, can I, can I, it sounds, it's, it's even unnatural for me to do it.

Cause I'm, you know, like, I'm like, Hey, can I show you what, you know, cowork is possible.

And, and, uh, and then, uh, but it ended up, we ended up having a lot of fun.

So yeah, I would love for like that conversation starter, um, would be great of,

Yeah, because I just want to make sure we keep sharing the knowledge and making the tool equitable, because if not, I'm concerned that the divide grows larger and larger.

Me too.

I find that sharing use cases, as you said, is so powerful.

I was just using Cowork the other day to fill out my son's camp forms and just sharing that on Twitter.

Just like a lot of people are like, oh, wow, I didn't think about that.

It's just like these little things you don't think about that Cowork and Clocko can do.

Kind of along those lines, speaking of cowork, if you think about it, Anthropic has been super early on uncovering these really big opportunities ahead of everyone else.

For example, coding.

So far ahead.

Like, realizing this is a huge market.

Whether it was intentional or not, it was just like, whoa, that's maybe the biggest...

New business opportunity history.

And then co-work is a great example.

Just leaning into knowledge work.

Let's just make, let's just solve all the knowledge work.

Why not?

So far ahead of everyone else.

Another element is it feels like a focus on the personality of the model, something you all were very early on, just how important that is, not just for the experience, but just also the intelligence and success of the model.

What is it that you think Anthropic and the teams do differently

Differently that allows you to uncover these opportunities and then just go big on them before other labs, let's say.

Well, I haven't worked in any other labs, so I'm not sure how the labs operate.

But I will share like, yeah, with and like actually on the Cloud Code team as well and co-work, like we also keep an eye on like latent demand.

Now, we're very fortunate with coding as a use case because so many ads that we were, you know, like our own first customers and we're able to do like really rapid feedback.

And so I think, but latent demand has been like, for example, like co-work, we noticed a lot of folks that were not necessarily coders were,

We're using cloud code.

Can we make that experience better?

I think that's actually even outside of Anthropic that served me well in all the different products I've worked on.

And actually, it's funny you mentioned the cloud for my passion with small business.

After I had a few of those visits, we ended up now launching cloud for small business.

Which is really cool because I, and it totally didn't come from me, so I'm not taking credit, but I noticed it too of like when I was working with, because they were asking me, oh, does it have this plugin or this plugin?

I'm like, I think it does.

And then we have to, you know, go and search for it.

So actually now cloud was all business bundles it all up.

So inside cowork, you just have this little toggle.

And there were, there were, there was a wonderful team that's been kind of like, uh,

You know, doing co-work sessions with small businesses that probably found, hey, we could have like an efficiency gain here or like make the experience better.

And so I would say like always, not only for products that you're on, like making sure you're always...

You know, listening to feedback and always iterating, trying to make a delightful, reliable, high quality experience, but then also keeping an eye out for, oh, what are these other use cases that are popping up?

And can we also make that experience better?

It's interesting.

In software, I've learned that customers will use your product in ways that you did not intend for good or for bad.

And so the best way is really like it's all about the iteration, learn and keep close to the feedback.

Wait in demand.

That term's come up a bunch on this podcast.

There's some there.

Might be some there.

So essentially, it's just watching closely for behavior that you may not have expected or that is just kind of emerging and then just going big on that, essentially exploring it, building something awesome.

Yeah.

And having a hypothesis for, hey, like, because actually when you see people jumping through hoops to make something work, can you actually make that an even like a smoother and better experience?

Yeah.

Coming back to the way that your teams operate, you guys are so at the edge of what's possible.

And the role of just engineering has changed so much.

I'm curious what you think is the next kind of frontier of how engineering in particular is going to change.

Is it like, you know, fleets of agents?

Is it something else?

Just like what's like the next big shift to how engineers operate that either you're already working on or implementing or just like it's starting to happen?

I would say we're shifting more towards async, like asynchronous.

And so to your point, the fleets of agent, like that's why routines are so interesting because it's almost like I used to be like, you know, doing a prompt and synchronously.

And then I would like maybe like kick off different prompts asynchronously.

But now I can actually have a routine that actually generates, you know, these prompts for me.

So it's almost like the level of abstraction keeps pulling up a little bit.

And so I would, yeah, I wish I have a crystal ball to see what this is going to look like.

It'll be fun actually for you and me to revisit a year from now.

No, I want to hear more about this.

So help us understand what is routines and then what is, when you say synchronous, you're writing a prompt and it just kind of goes off and isn't writing it immediately.

Talk about what this actually looks like.

Yeah,

So routines is like how you can, like,

So if you remember, I was trying about my, what I used to do is always like, you know, wake up with my morning cup of coffee and hey, look at through this Slack channel for me.

But then now like I have a routine that I set to run every morning at a certain time to say, hey.

Mm-hmm that's right uh but then it's able to actually go and kick off agents on your behalf

And so that's because like that's what like and you know even you know before it would be oh you could like yeah do a cron job to automate like but now it's hey look at these feedback and then if you're seeing some of these bugs that what are some polish fixes that you might be able to to knock out and then it would like go kick off

And then i wake up and i ended up

Having PRs that I could review versus before, which is still more of a different agents.

And then it's still, I'm still thinking about, okay, now what do I do with this information?

So it's like that higher level abstraction of, okay, now how can I

Actually write a routine that also basically does prompts for me for spawning different agents.

So I think we'll move more towards that kind of like asynchronous style of working.

So interesting.

So like in a sense, as a manager, you have these kind of things you do daily.

And what you're saying here is you can set up these prompts that kind of check in every day on the things you would be doing.

Like, how are the projects going?

What's falling behind?

What should I implore?

Who is, uh, who's struggling and, uh, what's, how do I fix some, improve some, some polish.

And so the idea here, what you're describing here is kind of write these things that you almost do as a manager daily and have clot essentially do them for you and then show you, here's what I'm doing.

Here's what I, here's what there's to review.

And then it's even like then giving even more autonomy at some point of it.

You know what?

Like go for it.

Like for example, a verification is really good.

Yeah.

Go for it.

I see.

So you give it like a little bit of freedom to do more of this.

OK, that is so interesting.

It reminds me, speaking on this idea of go for it.

I don't like I wasn't planning to talk about this, but I just watched Tyler Cohen had this awesome talk about just like what's happened.

I don't know if you know, Tyler Cohen is really smart.

The economist has a podcast and he just had like there's so much talk of.

The people that are doing best in this world, his term is initiative.

They have initiative.

Another term people use, agency.

Is that something just like, you know, people hear this a lot, just like the people that seem to be doing best are taking the most initiative, getting the most proactive, have the most agency.

Does that kind of spark any thoughts to you, just what people may need to, I don't know, think about or improve on?

Actually, that's agent.

It's I love that word agency.

That's what we really hold important on the cloud code and cowork team.

But it's interesting.

I say along with high because like we really it's about like, hey, here's a problem.

And then it's really everybody on the team has ideas for how to address the problem.

So it's really high agency.

And then we say with high agency, it's also high accountability.

So it's all about like making sure folks have that freedom to cook.

But then it's also like, okay, what's the accountability for it as well?

And that's where, and again, it goes back to like, what's the hypothesis of what you're, you know, like trying to solve?

So I think, yeah, the balance, like we're, you know, almost like two sides of the same kind of agency and then accountability, I think has served our team really well.

That's such an important element of an agency.

Okay, cool.

Everyone's off doing stuff, but okay.

What have you actually, what have you busted up?

What have you done?

So kind of along those lines,

It feels like there's this vibe shift recently from token maxing, just go crazy, spend as much as possible, just see what's possible to like, wait, what are we actually getting out of this?

How much is it costing?

What's the ROI?

Interestingly, Boris was actually head of inch productivity at Meta.

That was his job, is measuring inch productivity.

And then also just this tweet of lines per code, like code shift.

There's this interesting discussion of just how do you actually measure productivity increase and ROI of...

AI tools in spend.

How do you, like, you know, you guys have the unfair advantage of getting free tokens working in Anthropic.

With that in mind, what have you learned about just how to measure, say, ROI of engineers in today's world?

This end productivity is such a fascinating topic.

Yeah, because I remember, you know, like even Boris mentioned, like, you know, we'll first start with like lines of code and then that throughput.

And then I remembered once then there was a debate of, well, lines of code, this engineer had this crazy lines of code, but they just took some library and then just was porting it.

So they checked it in and then I was like, well, maybe it's significant lines of code.

And then it's, well, but what if we're, you know, updating our frameworks and now we're generating less code, but like the output's still the same.

So now it's like, okay, maybe it's, it's like time to land PR.

Like, but, but it's very interesting if it's always been whichever metric it's, it's like, if, if you're really focused on the, like my advice here is.

One is output.

Like, is the output really going towards the outcome?

Because, yeah, like the token maxing, it's kind of like a it's almost like the lines of code that we used to have.

But I'm really much more about a what is it that we're trying to do?

Like all of this, you know, there was another saying, I really don't forsake motion for progress.

Because if you're measuring tool user usage, then you're measuring the action, but is it really making whatever the end outcome of yours important?

And so I really try to zoom out and focus on what is the problem we're trying to solve?

What's a good way to measure that?

And then that's what we focus mostly on versus...

Kind of like the productivity measurement.

I would say though, like outside of metrics, especially if on teams, as you're having more people adopt AI tooling, I would say definitely go on a listening tour for the leaders listening to a podcast, especially, you know, I love to focus on the senior and juniors as well, like hear from them on what's working, what's not, how can we actually

Make it better because they will also help you multiply and scale that out across a full engineering team.

And sometimes it's those conversations where you might get spark an idea that comes up and also really good shared learning versus, you know, like metric dashboards.

It's very interesting.

I've learned some good lessons for metrics.

I'm all about like, it's really great when you have a metric that you can actually hill climb on.

But always keep in mind is, you know, kind of my whole growth mindset of, is it still serving you?

Always keep in mind, like, is that metric really still serving the outcome that you were aiming for?

Like

A fun example I have of this is in the early Facebook marketplace days, we were kind of like launching by region and we really want to make sure we're building a delightful product before we expand.

And I remember in the early days, one thing we would keep an eye on is kind of like number of sellers.

And I remembered after launching to our first region, I'm like, oh, in this area, the number of sellers is low.

But actually people are like people are finding items that they're looking for, which is what we're aiming for, like helping people find items that they need.

And then I realized in that region, it wasn't a large number of sellers, but there were power sellers.

But our first gate before we expand would have just been like, you know, factoring heavily number of sellers.

And I remember that quick conversation of, hey, and this goes back to that whole people use things in ways you may not expect and shift, iterate, learn.

And so so then we updated the metric to go, oh, you know, like it's not a number of sellers because it didn't factor in power sellers.

And so that's the advice I have too, like whatever metric, whether for productivity or even for product, always keep an eye and make sure that you're not just having blinders on that's blindly following a metric that used to make sense because sometimes the landscape can change so fast.

Even the metrics themselves might need to be adjusted.

And this comes back to your process that you shared of having Claude watch all the PRs shipping per engineer, let's say, and then not focusing on the metrics, but focusing on that leading to a conversation about what impact this had, what was maybe some bugs that happened, and that being a really powerful way of understanding what's going on with this engineer.

Yeah.

Awesome.

Let me come back to this question of speed and quality and just like impact.

Is there anything else you've learned about just how to

Balance those things, just like this crazy velocity of code that's being generated and just staying on top of quality and impact.

Is there anything else there that might be helpful to other teams that are trying to wrangle all this, all these PRs being shipped every day?

I would say, and this is what honestly we want to keep doing more of and being better at it too, like the proactive quality.

So especially for quality, making sure that what are the experiences that are key and making sure you actually, you know, actually speaking of metrics, those are really good things that you make sure you can kind of like see trends over time.

And so like on the quality front, we found like, and this is like the more proactive we can be of like making sure we can get an earlier detection into quality.

And so like that's been one thing that we've been paying a lot of attention to.

Yeah.

Like, you know, I started this, hey, let's have a concept of what's bad versus what's sad.

And bad is like a very bad irrecoverable error.

And sad is something that's kind of like a pain point recoverable.

But it's interesting when you stack up sads, it could, you know, generally go to bad.

But even having like starting with a high level framework like that, because if not, like I think sometimes with dashboards, you can have...

You know, like time to load or all these other, but when you're dealing with a lot of different product surfaces, it's harder to go, wait, is that a good number or not a good number?

And so one thing that's helped us is versus just raw, you know, like performance or, you know, like reliability numbers, also having some framework of what we think is, you know, like a bad experience and making sure we're,

Focus on addressing those and then also keeping an eye on where we're seeing in terms of the sad.

I like that.

Yeah, I like the bad and sad.

So these are kind of like thresholds of this is bad.

Okay, this is serious.

And this is in terms of like performance or failures or what sort of things are you measuring here?

So for example, like we allow each team, like speaking of agency, so knowing that bad is like a really bad irrecoverable error.

We enable each team of further surface areas or it could be services that, you know, they lead.

What is like, so for example, on CLI could be crash rates.

Like a crash is pretty bad.

You lost work.

And for example, a stab might be, hey, is it flickering?

Like it might be recoverable.

But we have each team, and that's why it's been interesting because before each, because surface areas are different, like we would have all these dashboards, but it's harder to zoom out and go,

Okay, what's the overall theme of the experience?

So to your point, we give high agency to each team of what we think constitutes a bad experience.

And what's a side and then what's the goal that each team wants to take?

One of the like the main takeaway I'm hearing here is one of the best tools for staying on top of quality is just monitoring and tests versus spending more time reviewing.

Which makes sense because the speed is just impossible to stay on top of.

And it almost speaks to this idea of closing the loop for agents to be able to kind of figure things out themselves.

They know what success looks like, cool, we'll fix it ourselves.

So that's a really interesting takeaway is just invest more in the tests, evals, I imagine is part of this, and then just like monitoring failures and speed and things like that.

That's right.

I think this is public.

I know that you guys have this dashboard that tracks just like F words, like how often people are like F because they're so pissed and frustrated.

There's like a funny term for it, I think.

I forget what it's called.

Yes.

Actually, I remember, yeah, that was last September because we were all, we were all seeing some frustrations and yeah, that was an engineer on the team of, hey, we should maybe track square words.

I'm like, oh, that's a great idea.

I remember it.

I had just, you know, joined when we were having that really fun conversation.

Yeah.

So it's, it's again, like, it's very interesting to kind of like look at, and that's why like evals is hard too, because it's,

Going back to like that user experience and how we can make sure it's a delightful experience and less frustrating.

But yeah, the swear word dashboard is a fun one.

This episode is brought to you by Mercury.

Radically different banking loved by over 300,000 entrepreneurs and now with command.

I've been a customer of Mercury's for over six years.

I have never once thought about leaving.

Mercury is basically what happens when banking is built by product people, not by bankers.

They make it so easy, dare I say fun?

To send invoices, move money around, set up virtual cards for folks on my team.

Does your bank have an API, a terminal native CLI, or an AI-ready MCP server?

I don't think so.

And just recently they launched Command, a conversational interface built directly into Mercury, which acts as your financial operator.

I've been using Command to transfer money around to figure out what categories I've been spending the most money in, analyze my cash flows.

And just today I used it to find out how much I've made from a specific sponsor over the past year.

I just asked.

How much have I made from X over the past year?

10 seconds later, I have an answer.

It is so freaking cool.

Visit mercury.com to learn more and apply online in minutes.

Mercury is a fintech company, not an FDIC insured bank.

Banking services provided through Choice Financial Group and Column NA, members FDIC.

Kind of going back to the way you operate and ways that you've figured out to work in this crazy new world that we're in.

I've heard about a couple things that you've implemented that are pretty unique, I think, to how teams operate, and I think is something that has worked really well for you.

One is making every manager start as an IC and then just every manager has to continue being an IC part time kind of this player coach approach.

Talk about that, why that's so important in today's world.

I love it.

It's funny when I first joined because I have amazing recruiting partners and I noticed we were, you know, this whole theme of kind of growth mindset.

It's just because the landscape is changing so fast.

Like what worked well before like may not make sense.

And even what makes sense today may need to change tomorrow.

Right.

Like that's what I have to keep reminding myself.

So yeah, when I first joined recruiters, like, okay, yeah, we have these couple like manager postings.

And I'm like, you know, because actually how it came from like a listening tour I did with like all the all the members on the team.

And I heard a lot of these, hey, I really appreciate the agency, but how can I make sure prioritization and

And so I kind of, through that, I realized, and then there was some really good feedback too of making sure that it's not too many layers of reviews.

Like there was good feedback.

Some folks might have joined from other companies or like, you know, and then I'm like, hmm, when...

I actually think as a leader, if you actually start as I See First without the worry of supporting people, because that's a very heavy responsibility that I think matches.

But before you have to take on that full responsibility,

Give yourself that maker time to actually dive deep into the code and learn the code base or the product, like whatever it is.

It doesn't have to, like honestly, the PRs I do are like,

But it's more about for me, it's important because it keeps me in the flow because we're making so many changes to co-work and code.

So even me doing PRs, it's less about what it is I'm fixing.

It's more about me using the primary data just to keep that touch.

Because as amazing as metrics and everything are, and I do look at those dashboards, if you...

As a leader, if you're not, you know, like living and breathing your product every day, you sometimes kind of like lose touch of the touch and feel of the product.

But anyways, on the manager front, I think giving time for managers that join to be able to go deep and to do that before supporting people.

And then they actually end up building really great rapport with the team.

Because if not, I think sometimes as managers,

You know, you might come and join a new team and you instantly think, I have to manage.

Let me dig into my manager toolbox and do manager-y things.

But if you actually give yourself time to not have to worry about that first and actually learn what it's like to be an engineer and teammate on the team, that also goes really far forward.

To building rapport.

And in terms of like using the product, I think that's important.

It's interesting.

Every team I've joined, one of the first, actually across all the different products, it could be

VR, it could be smart glasses.

It was like Instagram.

Usually when I first joined, one comment that comes back to me is, hey, you know what?

I really love how you're actually using what we build.

It's refreshing to see, you know, you giving user feedback.

And so I think as leaders too, it's also a way for us to experience the work personally that the team does.

Something that people may not realize, you were overseeing an org of like 500 people at Beta before you moved to Anthropic, right?

And you moved to IC, IC Engineer, basically, at Anthropic from that.

I started out like it was for a very short amount of time.

But actually, this was my journey between Microsoft and Meta.

So at Meta, I interviewed as a manager.

But I think at least for the first quarter, I was also an IC because I really wanted to learn what it's like to be a Meta engineer.

Because before then, I was...

At Microsoft, kind of like cut my teeth on engineering at Microsoft.

So I knew all the code bases, the tools, the languages.

And yeah, but it was so valuable to have those first months, like actually learn what it's like to

Ship as a meta engineer

Plus it was also fun like I think sometimes we forget if we like and that's by the way what I love about CloudCode because the last time I shipped production software at meta was probably 2017 and every year I might like I do a lot of dog fooding and a lot of

I also use dog feeding to help me vet the quality of product as well.

But it's been a very long time since I shipped production software.

It's because part of it is I don't want to screw something up.

I'm always so scared of what if I do something and then I...

Cause a bug?

And then am I verifying everything properly?

Or am I wasting someone's time?

Because, you know, like also the tool flows would change.

But I remember that first week on cloud, I'm like, I

At first, I almost, again, went did my usual, let me go meet all the engineers and treat them to coffee.

And then I'm like, oh, wait, wait, wait, let me ask Claude.

And so Claude was this really good onboarding buddy of mine because I was curious about the co-biz, asking questions and everything.

And then it also really, you know, helped me like, you know, do the automated test, but I also want to still do some manual testing.

And I asked God, hey, help me come up with like, what's the way for me to manually test this to make sure I cover all the case.

But all that then gives me confidence that, okay, I can ship peers again.

And then I got like kind of more comfortable with it again.

And so I've actually had a lot of friends reach out to me that have been managing for a while that's like, hey, I'm shipping code again.

Thanks to Claude.

But in general, it's just important to me as leaders to make sure you're kind of like using the product that your team builds.

It's so interesting that you are overseeing the team as an angel leader that is most changing the role of an engineer.

It's such a meta role.

Like the work of an engineer is transforming because of the software that you're building.

One question along these lines is just, do you worry about engineers' skills to code atrophying from not actually writing code anymore?

And does it even matter?

Is this like something you think about?

Is it a big deal?

It's interesting because we actually have this discussion on the team a bit.

Are there things that we miss?

Actually, to your point, I'm always thinking about when someone's onboarding and ramping.

You have Boris who hand-rolled the code in the early days and of course now doesn't anymore, but he gained that knowledge from before because he was in the code days.

So for especially all the engineers that join, I'm also like, make sure you're like taking the time to to all the work that you do still get the understanding of the architecture or the change because it goes back to that trust but verify.

Maybe one day it won't matter anymore.

But at the pace that we're going, I actually still think understand like it's always double clicking on that layer that you depend on.

Maybe that to me is a matter.

It's always take that time to learn about your dependencies because this way when your dependencies change, you're kind of more aware or you might not be taking advantage of changes to dependencies.

So I think it's always about doing that double click.

But the other thing that we found interesting on the Cloud Code team is after a while, we felt it could start being a lonely experience because we all started just working with our agents so much.

So recently, we started maybe like a pairwise programming lunch

Because what we also learned was on Cloud Code, everybody uses Cloud Code to work.

Everybody uses a flow so differently.

And so we found that, wow, when we do pairwise programming, we actually learn so much from each other.

And then the other thing, too, is we make sure that we also have the maker time together, too.

So, for example, hackathons is great.

Is another thing we really like to do just to make sure we're kind of like interacting together as a team.

That is such a good point, just like the loneliness that emerges because it used to be eng teams building code together.

Someone's doing backend, someone's doing frontend, someone's doing iOS app, probably a bunch of people on the backend.

And it's like, well, we have 10 clods running in parallel doing all these things.

That is such a good idea of just like finding ways to connect engineers.

So the idea here is like almost pair programming, but not.

It's like parallel.

It's like parallel play when kids are growing up.

Like you're kind of working next to each other, but building your own things.

But even just watching how other people build is your finding is really valuable.

Yeah.

And it's because our own tool chain is changing so fast as well.

But yeah, it's very interesting to me.

Like everybody on our team just uses Cloud Code and co-work in different ways.

And so every time I watch someone work, then I learn something myself as well.

How do you manage people getting over, like, obsessed with optimizing their workflows?

Is there anything you're just like, okay, it's fine.

Just keep going.

You know, I haven't seen too many folks on our team.

Like, I think everybody is just really excited about, you know, either an architecture update that we think will be higher reliability or some product experience.

So most folks, like, that's what we talk about a lot.

Like, yeah, we...

We don't over, it's fun lunchtime conversations, but I don't think we over optimize because there's no perfect answer actually.

There's too much to do.

Is there anything, these are really interesting insights, just like as the role transformed, things come, things go.

So I'm curious what else is kind of lost in this new world of software engineering.

I used to be an engineer.

I don't know if you know this.

I was an engineer for 10 years.

And it was like so fun just to sit there in flow coding.

You know, this feeling just like, oh, it's working.

We're going to compile.

It's amazing.

I'm making progress.

And now it's like you don't do that anymore.

You just sit there and kind of wait for agents to build the thing.

What else is kind of lost in this new world for engineers?

It's so funny.

I just had that conversation with an engineer on the team of talk about flow.

Like, remember the old days, you have this really gnarly problem and you pop that music soundtrack in and then you're just in the in the zone.

So, yeah, there is a little and then there was always that big aha moment at the end.

I would remember like, yeah, you remember like you finally cracked it.

Yeah.

So we do.

But it's like I think now we get a lot of joy from like the product.

But I do think there is because I hear from other engineers as well.

Well, I some of the hardest parts is what I used to enjoy.

Like, yeah, I heard that from another engineer as well.

And so I think we're all just kind of like.

Shifting um uh but i i do see like the the thing most and that's why i was

I was talking about like the pairwise programming and the hackathon that did recently come up

More folks were starting to feel like it started to be a lonely experience so interesting

Within Anthropic, I'm curious, so engineering, like the most transformed, I think, of any role right now.

What's like the second most transformed role so far, would you say, within Anthropic that's most different from how it was like a couple years ago, let's say?

It's all the coding adjacent roles are shifting.

Like PM is, I know like you were chatting with Kat, I think PM has also transformed quite a bit because PM are no longer bottlenecked of if they have an idea waiting on engineering bandwidth.

So that's kind of like the next road I saw on shift, like actually our PMs have also helped us roll up sleeves and help shift, you know, like some features when we, when we were, you know, like when, when there wasn't, when there was a

You know, something we want to do and an engineer wasn't able to.

So I think it's all the coding adjacent roles are starting to shift.

But I think that's where, again, the verification is important because when you have more different disciplines checking in, how do we make sure everybody has higher confidence?

I also think we need to do more to keep

Automating these other portions of the workflows.

Like for sure we focus a lot on coding, but next when you think about like design or data science, like those are starting to be the next areas that I think are good opportunities for us to see how we can, yeah, like start improving kind of the experiences there as well.

Yeah, speaking of data science, I have a data science friend and he was just saying how data science is so different now where now most of their job is people doing their own like not amazing data science work using AI and then just like showing it to the data scientists.

Here, here's the analysis I did.

Can you just make sure it's right?

And half the time it's not right.

And so the job is just like a whole different job now, instead of doing the work that they thought they wanted to do.

And that's like, all right, just reviewing all this AI data science all the time.

What the hell?

Kind of along the lines, coming back to just how your team operates and how things are changing, let me see if something comes with this question.

What should an engineering manager expect from their team now versus like a couple years ago?

What's like a normal, I don't know, baseline expectation of how things should work?

Is it other than just, you know, we're shipping faster?

Is there anything else?

Oh, interesting.

Well, definitely I think most commits are Claude-assisted.

And so that was a shift.

You know, I kind of like mentioned, we have like Slack channels with all the feedback and also our dashboards that we have give to call it.

I think having engineers build in, like keep building that stronger product sense muscle is I think also like another, and I think that in general helps kind of

We have these really trauma minded product engineers, I would say more of these roles that were traditionally non engineering, you do now see engineers being like, and sometimes you're just blocked by, you know, waiting for, you know,

Cross-functional partner.

I think there's less of those blocks now just because the models are able to augment additional capabilities that you may not have as an engineer.

So it's kind of interesting.

It's both directions.

Engineers becoming more product minded and responsible for the quality and success of a product.

And then everybody becoming an engineer more and more.

Yeah, that's right.

It's all blurring.

Yeah.

I forget who said this, but there's this like, what is a role anymore?

And this guy said that it's like, what's the average of what you do?

What's the highest percentage of what you do?

And that's kind of your role now, whatever it is.

Yeah.

Oh, man.

I want to come back to your point about...

Obsession with the the product living breathing the product dogfooding

I talked to a bunch of people that work with you about you and that's the thing that came out most just like your obsession with living and breathing the product using the product constantly whatever it is you're building

Uh this idea of dogfooding talk about just like why that is so important why that's something you instill within your teams and and reports

I love it.

Yeah, I think it's really, and this has worked for me, it's just been a really good way for me to keep a pulse on, you know, anytime you build product, there's a dream.

Like you're really hoping to enable an experience or,

Making an experience better.

So I think being able, like that helps me keep really close to the pulse.

I also think, and maybe something like for sure on Visual Studio, that was like, you know, where I got this love of it.

But it's interesting because even Marketplace, I remembered every time, once in a while I'll do like even after I left the team, actually.

One time I had like a MacBook Air I wanted to sell.

I'm like, oh, you know, I haven't sold anything on Marketplace lately.

And I could not believe it.

The minute I put it up for sale, a seller or a buyer tried to scam me.

And it was an interesting like new scan vector I didn't detect.

And so, but that goes to, again, like people will use your products in ways that you may not expect.

And so, especially as leaders or even like anyone on the team, we all have different like life.

Like, actually, it's funny when I was, you know, supporting the VR and AR teams, somehow

How I used VR, the setup, I would always be able to find these really weird floor height issues.

So that ended up being a, oh, I took a, you know, like I'm going to help us, you know, like, cause somehow I got a good repro environment, um,

And so I think it's number one, that's how you keep your pulse on the product that you're building and don't get too lost in metrics and dashboards only or presentations only.

I think that's such an important point you're saying there that I just want to make sure people hear is just like, there's always this idea of anecdotal evidence and just like examples versus the data.

And what you're saying here is as a product leader, as an energy leader, you found a lot of success in like the anecdotes, the specific little one-offs that you experienced as a user versus like obsessing with the data only.

Yeah.

And actually sometimes it's also how I've been able to most effectively help the team.

So for example, the last time I was on, I was leading a VR team and

Because back then, I have not checked in any code into that code base just because I was really worried about messing up the operating system.

But what was a gap?

We were doing a lot of polish.

And I wanted to...

I'm like, hey, you know what?

I'll use my dog feeding time to actually vet how the experience looks.

And so that was also probably a way that I felt I could still meaningfully contribute to...

Help hold the quality bar for the team.

And then, like I say, like every team member usually always really appreciates, because I think as a lead, like, you know, leader, you're supporting folks on team that outside of metrics and everything, everybody really wants to make sure their work matters.

And yeah, just making sure that

You know, leaders use their product.

I think folks feel the leaders then remain like really engaged and not too distanced.

And this connects a lot with your point that engineers need to become more product minded, that engineers need to become more PME, PMs need to become more.

But this is like as an engineer, this is one way to do it.

Use the product constantly.

And that'll help you understand what is missing in the product as a user because you're just using it.

That's right.

And I would say if you're leading a team where it's really hard for you to use a product, then meet with customers.

Like whatever the other avenue is that kind of like, I think that's also been really important to you every time I've

Done customer visits, I always learn something new.

Like, actually, I remember that was a Facebook marketplace.

We're trying to launch to Latin America.

And so we had, you know, we were testing in Chile and I remembered it just wasn't doing as well as the other regions we've done it.

Everything else we've tried.

And then I remember I'm like, oh, yeah.

And we had a really

Small research trip where I went to Chile.

I remember getting a whole bunch of Android phones for us.

It was a very small crew, like just three of us.

And upon landing and upon me opening up these Android phones and I'm like, ah!

You know, the LTE connection was much slower than what we were used to in the US.

And so I'm like, oh, the marketplace feed didn't even load very well on these low LTE situations.

What a growth block.

You know, you can't even load.

But again, that's why it's so important to always, you know, like listen to customer feedback and get that fast feedback loop.

I think it was Jeff Bezos that said, if you have the data and you have an anecdote, trust the anecdote over the data, surprisingly.

And that's a great example.

Okay, just a couple more questions.

One is in your talk, you had this really interesting slide at the end of what questions you're kind of thinking about right now that you haven't figured out how to solve with how much is changing.

I'm going to read the three.

I'm curious, just like if it's still these three, if there's anything else, like current problems we need to figure out that we haven't solved in how we operate.

What you shared in your talk was, do we still need separate iOS and Android orgs?

How far do you push fully automated reviews?

And with role blurring, how do you ensure everyone's equally productive?

Still problems.

Is there anything else that you're thinking about?

Like, okay, we need to crack this.

We haven't figured this out.

You know, the iOS, Android one, like I think we're still – actually, it's funny because speaking of like the deep expertise, we definitely feel that it's really important to still bring on folks with those expertise.

But we probably don't need like as large – because people are flexing.

So it's, again, making sure we have –

You know, like the Android and iOS experts, but then less of the larger kind of like mobile or one per.

And so, but again, that's still a balance that we're trying to figure out.

Do we have the right and enough expertise?

The second one was, sorry, what was the second one?

Oh, yeah.

It is.

How far do you push fully automated review?

Yes.

Actually, well, this is a fun one, like, you know, with the content design check.

I think we're looking for across all of it.

Like, how do you actually get what good looks like?

And so I have like, actually, the verification is still one that we I think, and that's kind of like the second and the third, that I think we there's more a lot more opportunities there for us.

But the how far to push, I think, looking at where we think experts still matters.

And then also, again, have to keep asking ourselves, okay, is there a way to

Leverage that expertise to also automate like I think um

Like looking across the whole end-to-end experience, like making sure we're not missing in.

Like I think we come at it from like an engineering standpoint, but making sure on experiences, how we think about those other areas.

I think there's definitely still more that we can do there.

How do you set up a verification that the experience is what you want it to be?

Exactly.

And I think that one is still a hard one to crack, because you kind of like mentioned evals, because some of it for sure is accuracy, but it's also the experience.

So that's something that, yeah, we're still kind of thinking through.

Awesome.

Is there anything else that's like, this has changed recently, we got to figure out how to rethink the way we operate?

Or is this kind of the big ones?

You know, I think because with routines and everything being more async, I think there is starting to be a high load on our context switching.

Because I even remember I myself was like, oh, I kicked off.

And so I think that's probably another thing we have to think about of how do we...

You know, whether for team members or our users, like how can we actually make the experience better to reduce that load?

Because I do see the context switching a little bit increasing.

Like if you have 20 agents running, there's just endless checking in and reviewing and you have to remember what you're doing there.

It's like such an interesting world where

Like the idea of flow we talked about before, like engineers and most people, like there's less of the just hours of flow.

But now the agents can kind of just remind you, here's where you're at, like the reset to switch almost instantly.

Is easier because you don't have to like re-learn everything.

You don't have to like re-understand the code base and the architecture.

You can kind of just like, okay, but here's what we're trying to do.

It's kind of like both got better, got worse.

Well, it's interesting because I used to do book out like focus time for like, you know, the focus time for coding because you want that dedicated and then the whole context switching.

And then it's interesting now that because I can context switch more with more ASIC agents, I'm noticing I do actually have to go back and block like a focus time for me to catch up on all the, you know, different ASIC work that I've kicked off.

Yeah.

Do you have any thoughts on the solution there?

Because that's hard.

People just want to do more and more.

And just how do you do that without constantly context switching?

It's really hard and annoying.

Yes, I agree.

Definitely haven't cracked it yet.

So interesting.

OK, there's a question I thought of as we're talking that I'm like so excited to hear your answer on.

I wasn't even planning to ask this, but it's so important these days, which is just like edge jobs and hiring.

So interesting that you would think AI would make engineers less necessary.

On the other hand, it feels like you guys are hiring engineers like crazy.

OpenAI is hiring engineers like crazy.

Just like there's so much demand for engineers.

Where do you think this goes?

What do you think about just the future of the end role?

Big question, but just thoughts.

Actually, I'll share some vulnerability here.

One, speaking of like big open questions, I really do think how we grow the next generation just because how you and me got to our engineering path is just so different.

It's almost like, okay, now when you...

Graduate from school.

It's like, how do you kind of fast forward?

But the important thing to me, but still understand kind of like, you know, that double click I talked about to the layer of a need.

But that is a big...

Question i have and i wish i have the answers

But i i wonder if it's um for software engineering

It's almost like you go more towards a fellowship or apprenticeship program

I know it's odd because technically we have like in internships that would but those were the kind of like three months and little projects

But i i do wonder if um

And I wish I have a crystal ball here, but it's, yeah, like how do you almost like cram in some of the, and maybe it won't matter, but you know, some of the life experiences that we all got, how do you actually enable us to kind of like teach that to, you know, the next generation of builders?

Right.

Like if you don't have to ever look at code, what's the incentive for a new software engineer to truly understand how infrastructure works

And memory allocation, all these things that are like kind of foundational?

And it's interesting.

Maybe the malls will get good enough that it doesn't matter.

You don't have to worry about it.

You know, but I do think there's something about that double click because I think that's where there might be an opportunity to improve the product or the system.

But figuring out how to learn that, not necessarily by, you know, like years of typing code.

Yeah.

Like somebody's got to have to understand code at some level.

It's like some COBOL engineer they have to like pull out of retirement one day.

Like, do you remember how to write Python?

You know, actually, what's really fun, one of my, you know, previous managers, I mean, he started software engineer when it was punch cards.

And it's so fabulous.

Like he's been messaging me everything he's been building with cloud code.

And I'm like, wow, what a career that you go from.

Like he's really like he, you know, he's really kind of like seeing this whole thing.

So maybe I think for us to think about is like when I think about his career, how he got started with punch cards was also totally, totally different than now.

And so it might be that I think it'll be interesting for us to see what remains important.

And then what changes in terms of importance?

And then it's like, how do you kind of gain... Like I have a theory, maybe that's what is important will shift over time.

And then how do you kind of...

Kind of build the proficiency in doing that.

Yeah.

Just learn the things that really matter.

Like the argument that I constantly hear is just like, it's a new level of abstraction, just like assembly and binary, like it just keeps going up and up and now, okay, we don't need to actually look at the code.

It's like a new layer of abstraction, prompts and, and, uh, Claude's thinking, uh, you know, messages.

Yeah.

And it's maybe like, okay, what is the interesting problem?

And what's the prioritization for experience to build?

Like, it's interesting.

Maybe we're kind of, yeah.

And then when you build things, how do you know it's actually resonating and

And it's kind of like doing what you intended.

And it's good.

Yeah.

Like, is this going to... Are we just building a bunch of slop here?

Or is this actually architecture that will work?

I think the advantage, though, for young people is they are so...

It's so much easier to just lean in and work in this new way versus being stuck in the way that things used to be.

It's like rare.

It's like amazing how many longtime engineers like yourself have adapted and embraced this.

It's like so hard to just change everything.

Okay, let's do it.

Everything.

Well, because the rate of change is also so fast.

Actually, that was the one thing.

I remember the first time, it was probably Sonnet 3.5 or 3.6.

And I remembered, I was still making some mistakes when I was doing things on the side.

I'm like, what are you doing?

And then what I noticed was some of the engineers that were resisting said,

Ai tooling

They're like ah but see it's you know like look at all of these

But then i think it was hard to understand of how kind of like the exponential rate of improvements and so um always and maybe that's another interesting thing that i myself i'm learning too like there might have been something i tried to automate that claude wasn't quite good enough and then actually in the next model all

Oh, well, now it is good enough.

So it's always also thinking about what may have not worked.

Like it might be worth the time to revisit because, you know, that now might be a new capability.

Yeah, that comes up a lot in this podcast.

Just build something that is almost working that is at the edge because once the model gets there, you'll be so far ahead of everybody else.

Okay, final question.

You may have already answered this with what you just said, but what keeps you up at night?

You know...

The thing that keeps me up at night is probably it's how we so, you know, we talked about kind of like cloud code and co-work team culture.

And the team culture is really important to me.

Like it's the one team mentality.

And I, you know, I share with folks.

And by the way, culture is like a living, breathing thing.

It's not just a poster you slap on a wall and it changes over time.

And it shows up in how we treat each other, how we're there for each other.

And so the culture of the team is important to me because we are growing.

And and since the culture shifts, like making sure that maintaining the things are important, that we are we still really like it's really important for me to have like diverse perspectives.

So then we can have, you know, like good, healthy, open, honest debates out in the open.

And we kind of like welcome those and kind of what I call that one team mentality that when you get close to the finish line, look behind you and see is there.

Someone from your team to help because we can't finish as a team.

That's probably the thing that keeps me up at night.

And it's like, you know, there's so many other hard problems, right?

But I think maybe a lot of the other ones are...

Product or engineering challenges that yes we have you know like dashboards or theories or hypothesis like but uh the culture is like a human aspect that is um

Like I think that's the one that I always want to make sure that we're – as we grow, we're still kind of like maintaining that culture because it is kind of like the fiber of the team.

And like when it starts drifting, it – I'm always worried of, you know, like –

If it drifts, are we catching it and having conversations as a team together to make sure we're kind of all wanting the culture to grow in the right direction?

Yeah, I imagine everybody is struggling with this, considering the pace of change and the pace of hiring, just like especially at a company like Anthropic that's in this crazy, like the most unprecedented growth trajectory in history.

I could see how that could be a challenge with so much change.

So it makes sense.

Like even at Airbnb when I was there, that was quite a growth trajectory and that was nothing like what you guys are going through.

And that was a constant topic of conversation.

How do we maintain the culture?

Actually, I'm curious, what was your experience at Airbnb to maintain the culture as you were growing?

There's a couple things.

One is just what worked well is the founders being obsessed with it.

Like every all-hands, every...

Every big meeting is just like reminding of like the culture and the value of the culture and what the values are.

Just the founders top down being obsessed with it was a big part of it.

You just like couldn't have a meeting without that coming up as a as a thing.

The other is a memory I always come back to is we had Sheryl Sandberg, speaking at Meta, come do a fireside chat.

And somebody asked her just, how do you maintain culture as you scale?

Because we're just growing so fast and it's so hard to deal with all this change and culture and all these new people.

And her advice was, this is actually the problem you want to have.

Because this means you're growing and doing well.

And this is normal.

Versus you can...

Nothing will change if you're doing badly.

That's a much worse situation when you're not growing and you're not hiring like crazy.

That's a much worse situation that will cause even more pain and suffering.

So this is a good problem you're dealing with, is her advice, which has always stuck with me.

Oh, that's great.

Like, it's interesting, like hearing you talk,

I think one of the important things to kind of cloud code and co-work team is whether ICs or managers, but this is a thing I especially ask for managers on the team is really important that we all talk about for sure what's going on, but also just be open about what's not going well.

Because then if we can actually have the conversation of what's not going well, that's how we can actually go ahead and address it.

Speaking of what keeps me up at night, my nightmare is, especially if someone's in a manager position and

And I'm like, hey, how are things going?

Everything's fine.

I'm like, oh my gosh, I'm not doing fine.

I know this thing's like, it's that whole, like, you know how there was this meme of the Dr. Kia cup of coffee in her room that's on fire.

This is like, that is my nightmare.

So that's actually a discussion I have with,

A lot of folks on the team but especially managers especially when they first joined hey let's always have these open conversations so that we can solve problems together

I imagine this is something a lot of people struggle with, seeing so many people around them doing super well, at least seemingly doing well.

Everything's going great, I'm growing, this awesome company.

It's hard to actually be honest and say, it's not going great, I'm struggling here, I'm falling behind.

Because everyone around you is just on the surface feeling like they're killing it.

Before we get to our very exciting lightning round, is there anything else that you either want to leave listeners with?

Anything else that we didn't cover?

Anything else that's important that you wanted to share?

Maybe one thing is just a suggestion, because we talked about how can Cloud automate.

One other thing that's really big on Cloud Code and co-work team culture is,

Explicit permission to kill processes that no longer serve us and so maybe a suggestion is for you know any anyone you know like on working on a team or leading teams like pick your like what's one process that you either dread doing

Or is really highly noisy, or is, like, really expensive in terms of, like, just a lot of, like, it might, or is something that's just very manual?

Like, pick one thing and first ask, is it still having its purpose?

Like, for example, when, like, even our planning, like, our

Actually, that was my own big first learning when I first joined Clockhood.

I'm like, hey, maybe we should, you know, do a six-month roadmap doc.

But we're going to do it super lightweight because I don't want to waste a lot of time planning.

And I felt we did a really lightweight process.

That was such a good learning for me because the exercise was good to kickstart conversations and ensure aligns.

But like three months into it, I'm like, wait, have we still referenced?

Because so much has changed.

So that was also something I like.

And so that was also something I changed that I myself brought in thinking, hey, maybe this will help.

So always be open to learning and always ask yourself, whatever process you have, is it still serving its purpose?

Just because the field is changing so fast.

I love that advice.

I got to follow up on this real quick.

So what is it?

How do you think about planning now?

Do you do any planning?

Is it just like a month long roadmap?

What's kind of like the simple way to explain where you're at with that?

Yeah, I call it JIT planning now, like just-in-time planning.

So it is like around like, because yeah, I think six months was too long.

So now for sure, some projects will take more than a month, but we try to

Do like a month planning, like really lightweight.

Actually, there's not even dots.

It's really just us aligning on a little spreadsheet of what we think is important.

But even that one, I'm kind of thinking through

Hey, like every week we should probably still keep a, like what we're trying is here are the month's priorities and we're going to try it out.

But I have a feeling like every week we'll probably want to do really quick, like, hey, just to check.

Yep, this is still this month's priorities.

Good.

But yeah, like, but now we've shrunk it to monthly planning.

So it's monthly meaning for the next month.

Here's a little sheet slash Excel spreadsheet of what we're planning to do for the next month.

And then every week check-in is still what we're planning to do for the next month.

Yeah, it's like very, very weird.

But even that one, I'm also still feeling how can we even automate this more?

Because I never wanted to be feeling like a tax when someone has to, you know, update the spreadsheet.

So this is actually, yeah, like just yesterday, we're chatting, hey, how can we actually automate this?

Speaking to that question, always ask yourselves, can we actually automate this better?

Like my PM brain is like, that's so like, how could you not do something like that?

Okay, here's what we're thinking for the next month.

Let's just check it once a week.

Like it's hard to imagine that not happening.

And you don't have a lot of items on the spreadsheet is what I'm hearing also.

Yeah, like we really try to focus.

So like we will share like here's what we think are the highest priorities.

And again, for that agency, given the priorities, then like everybody's like they're kind of like item for how they think addresses those priorities.

Is there anything that's like here's for the next like six months, bigger bets kind of stuff?

Or is it just like, let's just think one month ahead?

So, well, usually definitely there's themes of where we think the work and so we'll definitely like, and actually the whole team will bring everyone together like every six months.

So there we'll usually kick off like some themes, but then it's really the making sure we keep the pulse of what, because again, like even those themes change constantly.

You know, so fast when the landscape changes.

All right, let's pull up the spreadsheet and let's take a look.

Oh, man.

Man, this whole podcast could have been just talking about this planning stuff that you do.

Okay.

I'm going to have to find someone else to talk about this because it's so interesting just how you all plan.

Yeah.

Okay.

Well, Fiona, with that, we reached our very exciting lightning round.

I've got five questions for you.

Are you ready?

Ready.

Okay.

First question.

What are two or three books that you find yourself recommending most to other people?

Oh, I will say for fiction, actually two authors I recommend to everyone, Margaret Atwood and Haruki Murakami.

Um those are just two like and like

I mean i grew up in canada so so i i read a lot of that with growing up

But her books are fascinating because it's almost like speculative fiction of you can kind of squint and say okay could this actually you know like happen to to a society

So so i love her take on speculative fiction and

Murakami, I love his magical realism style.

But then the one book, so there are authors, but the one book I always recommend to everyone to read at least once a year or, you know, The Little Prince.

I'm sure we've probably all read it at some point in our lives, but I read it at least once a year just to remind me to think about what's truly important.

Wow.

That hasn't come up a bunch.

Okay.

I love it.

Favorite recent movie or TV show you've really enjoyed?

I haven't watched TV shows.

That's very common across anthropic people I have on the podcast.

Common theme.

But I will share with you what I always have downloaded on my phone so that if I'm on the airplane.

So there's three movies that I'll always have on my phone because I think they're just so fun to watch if I have time.

One is Emily.

It's this French movie that, oh my gosh, all of these movies are going to be very old, by the way.

It's going to be like vintage movies.

But I loved Amelie, super whimsical.

So really highly recommend it to anyone.

And even though I haven't seen it, it's, you know, if you remember, I told you I was, you know, going on a, I thought I was going to be a visual artist.

So when I was 16, my high school, we took a trip, a high school trip to Paris.

And that just, I have so many memories of that.

And Emily really did.

Captures the magic I felt at Paris and the other two are are Ghibli films uh I love Spirited Away

That's um it's just such a that's like just such a fab I just love that story I I love the

Yeah like I I just love every everything about Spirited Away is probably one of my

Favorite Ghibli films.

And then the third was another Ghibli film, Nausicaa, Valley of the Wind.

And I think about this one quite a bit because if anyone asked me, hey, how did you kind of think about, you know, all these leadership traits?

I think I watched that movie probably when I was eight or nine.

And the heroine, Nausicaa,

And seeing how she leads just left such a thumbprint in my heart, I guess you could say, that probably Nausicaa has inspired me a lot in a lot of my different leadership principles.

Wow.

What is that book called again?

The movie's called like Nausicaa Valley of the Wind, but it was actually based on a manga.

Valley of the Wind.

So it's like high output management, Andy Grove, Valley of the Wind, Nausicaa.

That's right.

Two top management books.

So cool.

Okay.

Do you have a favorite product you recently discovered that you really love?

Could be now.

Could be clothing, could be a gadget, could be kitchen equipment.

I don't know.

I'll share the product that I'm reminded of how much has made a difference in my life recently.

Because I've been just traveling a little bit and I like to travel really light.

So I use whatever shampoo and conditioner, you know, that the hotel gives.

And I forgot that.

So the product that I actually have one of their hand, I promise it's not an infomercial.

Sweet Sisters Body Care.

It's a local business on Whippy Island.

But the reason why their product has made such a big difference in my life, it's a full line of organic hair, body, skin care.

But a few years ago, I started getting this rash on my nose right here that was really painful, like actually bleeding.

And I could not for the life of me figure out how to stop it.

Like I tried not using any lotions.

Like I cut everything on my face and it was still really hurting.

And then somebody says, what's the shampoo you're using?

I'm like, it's the same shampoo I've used since I was, you know, like a teenager.

And they're like, maybe your body has now, and it's, you know, like generic, you know, brand shampoo they could get anywhere.

And they said, maybe your body's just start developing an allergy to it because of the chemicals in it.

Wow.

I'm like, what?

And so anyways, this was an organic shampoo that I found.

Lo and behold, I use our shampoo.

Because you don't think that when you wash your hair, it actually then goes over to the rest of your body.

So since then, I've switched everything that I used to be sweet sisters.

But I'm recently reminded of how important this is because after a week of hotel shampoo, I actually started having some skin reactions again.

I'm like, ah, maybe I should get like travel size bottles that I could bring with me.

This is an awesome pick.

I love local business picks, even big bonus points for that.

And by the way, this travel you're doing just for folks that may not know this, there's these Code with Claude events that are happening all over the world.

I went to the one in SF.

There's one in London.

You're going to one in Tokyo.

Is that the end of it or is there more after that?

Tokyo is, so yeah, that's next week.

And that's the last leg of the trip.

Okay.

And then probably more in the future.

So cool.

I love that that's happening.

Okay.

Two more questions.

Do you have a favorite life motto that you find yourself coming back to often in work or in life?

Oh, so in work, I really love to remind folks, keep it simple.

Like what is the thing that you're really trying to do well and focus on that?

Do you know, like keep it simple because I think sometimes we could overthink.

So it's always a good mantra to think about that.

And then in life, you know, probably in a world where you can be anything, be kind.

I love that one.

We were at a Montessori school tour and that's what the teacher had up on the wall.

Oh, like it's, you know, we have so many things going on that you never know what's going on in someone else's life.

And that one small act of kindness can make the biggest difference.

Yeah.

For me, actually, that was when, do you remember COVID?

We were all like working from home during, you know, the COVID days.

How could I forget?

It's just always really struck with me because I was in these, you know, back-to-back meetings and I always, one-on-ones are really important to me.

Because, you know, actually that time is usually also really important for the other person.

It's something that, you know, they've been looking to, they might have things they discuss.

So I always try, like I always really prioritize one-on-ones.

But during that time, my grandmother wasn't doing well and she was in a home in Canada and because of COVID, I couldn't go visit.

And actually even my

And, you know, aunt and mom couldn't go visit.

And it was this very rare of if they have a helper that can help, we could do FaceTime.

But you never know what time that is going to be because, you know, there's so many people that take care.

And all of a sudden I got a message from my aunt going, grandma can FaceTime at like 12 p.m. today.

I'm like, oh, no, there's this one on one that I've been meaning to have.

And I just messaged, you know, my reporter.

I'm really, really sorry.

It's the last minute.

Is it OK to.

And I know now it's when I say it doesn't seem like it's a big thing because it's like.

But to me, it's always really important to keep.

But he was like, yeah, totally.

No problem at all.

And for me, that was just a small act of kindness.

He doesn't.

And he totally didn't make it a big deal, but that made the biggest difference to me that I got to, you know, say hi to my grandmother on FaceTime.

I love that.

Okay.

Final question.

So Boris Cherny, when I asked him about you, when he had this interesting insight where he said in very important meetings, you can often hear Fiona, you can hear the click clack of Fiona knitting.

In the background.

Maybe talk about just what's going on there.

And what are a couple of things you knitted recently?

Oh, my gosh.

Well, I knitted this top recently.

You make your own clothing.

This is very meta for Claude Code building itself.

You know, we're always...

Actually, there's this whole fun thing I think between knitting and programming because it's kind of like two stitches, knit and a purl, so it's zero and one.

Anyway, so many concepts of stacks and queues you actually can replicate.

I'm kind of like a compiler.

I'm kind of like generating an executable when I knit.

Yeah, actually, it was my grandma that taught me to knit when I was eight.

I kind of mentioned her and I going to that yarn shop.

And so every time I knit, I think of her.

But I always like to multitask, as you can see, like, yeah, kick off multiple agents.

So anytime I'm sitting and because I practice enough and become proficient, I don't have to look at what I'm doing.

So it's almost like how, you know, sometimes people have like fidget spinners and such.

Knitting is just, so anytime I'm sitting still, I'm like, oh, this is time to, you know, like generate more knitting executable.

Yeah.

Because I got so much yarn that if I don't do this, yeah, my yarn, I might have a slight yarn addiction problem.

I love this.

When I asked Boris what he would do when AGI hits, when we don't have to work, he said he's going to make me sew.

I'm guessing your answer would be just knit and make beautiful clothing.

Oh, my gosh.

My dream is to actually open up a yarn store in my grandmother's name and create that community.

Oh, wow.

And then co-work would help you automate everything.

That's right, especially invoicing.

Oh my God.

Fiona, you're awesome.

It's just incredible the work that you and your team are doing, just changing the world in such profound ways.

And there's no, it's clear white.

It's growing so fast.

So good job.

Good job over there.

Thank you for making time for this.

Well, I'm just really honestly lucky and humbled that I get to work with such an amazing team.

Like I know how lucky I am and I'm so grateful.

But thanks a lot for having me on the podcast as well.

This was a lot of fun.

Two final questions.

Where can folks find you online if you are online, if they want to follow up on anything?

And how can listeners be useful to you?

Ooh, so definitely.

So I'm on LinkedIn and I'm sure most people have shared this already, but would love feedback of what's going well, what's not going well.

Also any latent demand that you are all using that might be interesting use cases.

You know, I had a friend message me recently to go, Oh, I'm using cloud to help me generate, uh,

A building plan for my shed.

And he actually showed me his whole shed, which was cool.

So I would love to hear about that.

And then, yeah, maybe also, you know, we talked about reaching out across.

So there's someone, whether a small business that you love or someone that you feel like hasn't, you know, assuming all the listeners are super AI pilled, yeah, maybe take a time to

Hold somebody's hand to show what AI might be able to help them with.

Such a good one.

That is such a good answer to this question, especially coming from you, Fiona.

This was awesome.

Thank you so much for being here.

Thanks so much for having me, Lenny.

Bye, everyone.

See you in the next episode.

[The Evolution of Engineering: Managing the AI-Powered Future with Fiona Fung]-[What happens after coding is solved? | Fiona Fung (Manager of the Claude Code and Cowork Teams)]

📋 Summary

The Paradigm Shift in Software Engineering

Embracing a "High Agency, High Accountability" Culture

The New Definition of Quality and Verification

The Human Element: Growth Mindset and Loneliness

Future Frontiers: Async Work and Just-in-Time Planning

Conclusion: Staying Close to the Product

🎯Key Sentences

📝Key Phrases

📖 Transcript

[The Evolution of Engineering: Managing the AI-Powered Future with Fiona Fung]-[What happens after coding is solved? | Fiona Fung (Manager of the Claude Code and Cowork Teams)]

📋 Summary

The Paradigm Shift in Software Engineering

Embracing a "High Agency, High Accountability" Culture

The New Definition of Quality and Verification

The Human Element: Growth Mindset and Loneliness

Future Frontiers: Async Work and Just-in-Time Planning

Conclusion: Staying Close to the Product

Deep Learning with ListenLeap

🎯Key Sentences

📝Key Phrases

📖 Transcript

ListenLeap Brings You Into Real Context Learning