This message comes from Netflix.
The series The Diplomat returns, starring Keri Russell as Kate Wyler.
With the president dead, Kate steps into a role she never wanted, with a freedom she never expected.
Watch The Diplomat, October 16th, only on Netflix.
This is Fresh Air.
I'm Dave Davies.
We'll be right back.
Our guest today, Aaron David Miller, spent years in the U.S.
State Department trying to forge peace between Israel and the Palestinians, working under Democratic and Republican presidents.
He says that, in bringing this ceasefire agreement to fruition, President Donald Trump dealt with Israeli leaders in ways no other president has.
He says Trump's transactional approach to politics and diplomacy probably helped in this case.
Today we'll look at how the ceasefire came to be and consider the challenges that remain for Israel and the Palestinians in Gaza and the West Bank.
Aaron David Miller spent 25 years in the State Department, playing a key role in the Oslo peace process in the 1990s.
He's received the State Department's Distinguished Superior and Meritorious Honor Awards.
He's now a senior fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace and the author of five books.
We recorded our conversation yesterday.
Aaron David Miller, welcome to Fresh Air.
David, it's great to be here with you.
I want to begin with an excerpt of President Trump's speech at the Israeli Knesset on Monday.
Let's listen.
This is not only the end of a war.
This is the end of the age of terror and death and the beginning of the age of faith and hope, and of God.
It's the start of a grand concord and lasting harmony for Israel and all the nations of what will soon be a truly magnificent region.
I believe that so strongly.
This is the historic dawn of A new Middle East.
And that's President Trump with a pretty expansive view of the accomplishment here.
I mean, you've said this isn't even really a peace agreement, right?
What is it?
Look, the reality, this is not the Egyptian-Israeli peace treaty.
This is not the Israeli-Jordanian peace treaty.
Agreements succeed or fail when they're tested over time.
This is not even a peace agreement.
What this is... and I don't want to take anything away from what this is, is a remarkable moment.
I worked on this process largely in Israeli-Palestinian negotiations since the 1980s.
Any agreement between Israelis and Palestinians, let alone one between two combatants who are pledged to one another's mutual destruction, is an extraordinary achievement.
What this is is a chance, after two years of Israelis and Palestinians visiting a parade of horrific horrors on one another.
What this is is the possibility of ending the war in Gaza and maybe building a broader bridge so that Israelis and Palestinians can find a pathway forward.
Right.
Since the announcement last Friday, Hamas did release the living hostages and Israel did cease offensive military operations and withdrew behind a designated line in Gaza.
We'll talk about the longer term prospects in a bit.
But do you think that these conditions I mean the cessation of hostilities will hold over the coming weeks?
You know I do and I usually don't having failed largely over a quarter of a century in helping to create circumstances for conflict-ending agreement between Israelis and Palestinians.
I usually default to the negative on this.
But I think, and it's fascinating to consider... what the first phase actually promises.
It contains, in my judgment, the three basic elements that in fact could create a foundation.
And those elements coincide with the reasons the international community, the region, the United States cared about Gaza, beginning on October 7.
First, it does address conclusively the issue of the remaining hostages 20 men alive who have been returned, 28 hostages who are no longer alive.
Only some have been returned.
And that's going to be an issue.
Whether it's a deal breaker, I doubt it.
But it will be an issue.
Hamas has committed itself to locating and returning the bodies. of 28 hostages.
And remember, out of the 251 or two that were taken on October 7 by Hamas in this willful and indiscriminate attack against civilians, sexual predation, mutilation and even the execution of hostages, 130 have been returned through negotiations.
These 48 and then roughly the balance have died in captivity.
It takes the hostage issue off the table.
And once that occurs, it undermines, undercuts the justification and even the credibility of Israel's comprehensive military actions in Gaza.
And it also obviates the need for the massive deployment of Israeli divisions tens of thousands of Israeli soldiers.
If, in fact, this is correct, it will create a new environment which has never existed beyond several weeks or months.
And that is to say an environment which will allow not just the dribbling of humanitarian assistance into Gaza but the flooding of the zone.
And once the zone is flooded, prices on the black market decline.
The advantages that accrue to criminal gangs and even Hamas in terms of the diverting of humanitarian aid and the use of that aid for recruitment all of these things begin to end.
And those three elements were the reasons the international community, the United States, the region cared about Gaza.
In a way Dave, it's a paradox, because it could be that, in reducing the urgency no hostages, no major military campaign resulting in the exponential deaths of thousands of Palestinians and no humanitarian catastrophe that people may actually begin to care less about what happens in phases two, three and beyond.
I want to talk about how we got here.
That is to say, how this agreement came together.
And I thought we'd begin by listening to another moment in President's speech to the Israeli Knesset, Monday.
He's praising Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for his role in the process.
And then he added this.
And he is not easy, I want to tell you.
He's not the easiest guy to deal with.
But that's what makes him great.
That's what makes him great.
Thank you very much, baby.
Great job.
So all smiles there between Trump and Netanyahu.
But you've made the point that President Trump has done something presidents that you have known and worked with couldn't, and that is to rein in Israel, to bend it to his will, in a way.
How was he able to do this?
That's a core question.
There are basically three reasons why this agreement came to pass.
Number one, Hamas is much weaker, particularly on the military side, and it's the military commanders, not the external leadership, that are making the decisions.
Number two are key Arab states, two of Hamas's principal backers of the three, the third being Iran.
Qataris and the Turks basically leaned on Hamas in a way that they had rarely have ever done before.
But it's the third factor.
Let's be clear.
We would not be having this conversation.
Had Donald Trump not done something that is quite unique, almost unprecedented in the annals of the US-Israeli relationship.
No president that I ever worked for Jimmy Carter to Bush 43 and I'd add in Obama and Biden no US president ever talked to an Israeli prime minister or pushed him and pressured him on an issue that that prime minister considered so vital, not only to his politics but his definition of Israel's national security.
In June of 1996, when Bill Clinton finished his first conversation with Benjamin Netanyahu, an exasperated Clinton walked out of the office and exploded.
Who's the effing superpower here?
That's what Clinton said about Netanyahu.
Donald Trump answered, that question, at least for now.
And let me also add, having worked and voted for Republicans and Democrats.
This is a man who is presiding over the erosion of American norms and institutions and undermining the very nature of constitutional government that his inaugural oath impelled him to protect.
And yet, he deserves enormous credit Yeah.
You know, for so long, it seemed that Trump would back Netanyahu no matter what.
I mean he sent the US aircraft to drop bunker-busting bombs on Iran's underground nuclear facilities.
It seemed he was with Netanyahu lock, stock, and barrel.
That changed.
How did Trump make it clear to Netanyahu that things had to change?
Do we know?
Partly, it's a paradox.
Yeah, he acquiesced in Netanyahu's Gaza campaign for nine months.
In fact, he reversed almost everything that the previous administration under Joe Biden did to signal its displeasure opposition to Israeli policies in Gaza.
He built up an enormous amount of currency with Netanyahu.
There's no question.
Trump 10 recognizing Jerusalem as the capital of Israel, moving the embassy, recognizing Israeli sovereignty over the Golan Heights, saying almost nothing about Israel's annexationist policies on the West Bank.
He created a sugar high for Netanyahu.
He had the wherewithal To actually then deliver.
In the words of a former US ambassador to Israel, Sam Lewis he applied ample amounts of honey Dave, but he also was able to apply ample amounts of vinegar.
And if Barack Ravid from Axios purporting is accurate, Trump actually left Netanyahu with no choice.
Comply or we will leave you.
He's alleged to have said this directly to Netanyahu.
I will abandon you.
I will leave you.
So the reason I'm persuaded about this is is that over the course of the last six months, Trump did things in and around Benjamin Netanyahu which also made him unique among his predecessors.
He authorized his hostage negotiator to open up a direct dialogue with Hamas in March.
He came to an agreement with the Houthis in Yemen, about which the Israelis learned after the fact.
He suspended sanctions against the Ahmad Sharif government in Syria over the objections of the Israelis.
And he announced negotiations with Iran, much to the dismay of the Israeli prime minister, in the presence of that Israeli prime minister.
And I think Netanyahu did not have to be threatened with specific sanctions.
Trump had signaled to Netanyahu that there would be costs and consequences.
One final point.
And because Benjamin Netanyahu is now focused on, more than anything else, how to win the next election.
Government comes to term in October of 2026.
It won't last that long.
Spring, probably.
He knows that to win an election he's going to need Donald Trump, not just as a bystander, but as an open campaigner.
Because Trump is enormously popular in Israel.
More popular in Israel, Dave, right now than Benjamin Netanyahu.
And the notion somehow, that we don't intercede in Israeli politics and they don't intercede in ours is just an urban myth.
You saw what the president did during that speech to the Knesset.
And only three American presidents before have addressed the Knesset.
Jimmy Carter, Bill Clinton... and George W. Bush.
I mean, none of them would have even come close to basically turning to the president of Israel and saying implicitly why don't you grant him a pardon?
I mean, he just he said the words.
That was remarkable.
Acknowledging Netanyahu's criminal charges for corruption.
I'm curious, speaking of that, what do you make of the notion that Netanyahu has sustained the campaign in Gaza in part so he wouldn't have to answer the corruption charges at home?
I mean, you know, on trial for bribery, fraud and breach of trust in a Jerusalem district court.
Four years now, almost five years in running now.
Yeah, I think that's a part of the calculation.
But staying in power and the vulnerabilities and risks to a leader.
He's the longest governing prime minister in history of the state of Israel.
He believes he is indispensable.
You said that Trump did things that no other president had ever done in dealing with Israel.
And Trump's negotiating style is also, well, unique, I think we can say, among presidents.
He's known as this freewheeling, transactional deal guy.
And there's also the fact that he and the Trump Organization, the Trump family – have a lot of business deals in the Arab world, particularly in Qatar, which Trump accepted an airplane from.
And you know a lot of not just Democrats but independent government ethicists say this isn't what a president should be doing.
You don't want foreign leaders to have leverage over the president, who has to guard the nation's interests, not their own.
Did these business relationships help him in this case?
I'm sure they did.
In fact, if Trump cared about any part of the Middle East, the Gulf was the thing.
Partly for the reasons that you say, the seamless lack of boundaries between what constitutes Trump's business interests and the American national interests has long been erased.
The Abraham Accords, his signal achievement, don't want to take anything away from that.
In Trump 1.0, he relishes authoritarians that don't have democratic constraints.
He loves to be flattered.
No, the Gulf is the thing for him.
And cultivating those relationships which both Witkoff and particularly Jared Kushner have done, particularly the Emiratis and the Saudis.
Basically, yes.
That certainly contributed to the Arab dimension of Trump's transactional nature.
It's the Israeli dimension, though, to me, that is key.
And what Trump was able to do and what made his transaction, in my judgment, possible in the one area that made this deal possible, which was his relationship with Benjamin Netanyahu, was two things which have impeded and constrained American presidents almost all of them from expanding the margin of pressure that they're prepared to place on an Israeli prime minister.
One is the emotional identification.
Trump, unlike Bill Clinton, who wrote in his memoir, I loved Rabin as I love no man.
Clinton was in love literally with the idea of Israel, the people of Israel, the security of Israel.
Joe Biden.
I listened to him three days after October 7th talk about the quote black hole of loss, unquote and the savagery of what occurred on October 7th and conflate that almost certainly with the tragedy of that had occurred in his own personal life.
Trump has freed himself from, in my judgment, the emotional constraints which have prevented a number of American presidents in having the kind of conversations that Trump had with Netanyahu.
But it's more than that.
It's the politics as well.
Trump is the first American president who has such a tight grip on the Republican Party That, in effect, Benjamin Netanyahu has cultivated the Republican Party for years as a sort of higher court of appeals.
If he ever was boxed in by a Democratic president, which he was.
I mean that in 2015, when Obama did the nuclear deal with Iran.
John Boehner invites Netanyahu to address Congress and Netanyahu takes it up.
It tries to end run the Obama administration.
Benjamin Netanyahu cannot end run Donald Trump because Trump owns the Republican Party.
American views of Israel look at the Pew polls have fundamentally been altered as a consequence of Israeli policies in Gaza.
So Trump has more running room, more room to maneuver on Israel than any other American president.
You know one other thing.
You said in an interview that I read about Trump and his ability to execute this maneuver.
You said he's transactional, he's situational and in many respects, it is the absence of core principles that allows him to pivot in a way that no other American president had.
And I think that may explain why now.
I think the September 9th strike by Netanyahu on Doha against the external leadership persuaded Trump that Netanyahu was now undermining something that was important to him.
That was the strike on Hamas negotiators in Doha, right?
In Doha.
Right.
And I think he began to understand that Netanyahu was undermining the Abraham Accords, creating a degree of instability in a region of the world where economic profit and financial gain requires stability.
And I think he began to see that Netanyahu was making him look weak.
And to use Trump's favorite term with respect to Putin –
Netanyahu was even playing him and believed that he had a much wider margin to do anything he wanted he Netanyahu, and that Trump would support him.
So I think yeah, I think that notion that this is something important to me, and I'm going to pivot from acquiescing and enabling Benjamin Netanyahu in Gaza to constraining him.
We're going to take another break here.
Let me reintroduce you.
We are speaking with Aaron David Miller.
He's a former State Department negotiator, currently a senior fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
We'll talk more about the Gaza ceasefire and prospects for the region after this break.
I'm Dave Davies, and this is Fresh Air.
This message comes from Sony Pictures Classics.
From Academy Award-nominated filmmaker Richard Linklater comes Blue Moon starring Ethan Hawke, Margaret Qualley, Bobby Cannavale and Andrew Scott.
On the night, Oklahoma opens.
Legendary lyricist Lorenz Hart faces his shattered confidence at Sardi's.
The Guardian raves a sophisticated, satisfying tour de force, Hollywood Reporter calling it beautifully executed.
Blue Moon opens in New York and Los Angeles October 17th nationwide October 24th.
This message comes from Schwab.
At Schwab, how you invest is your choice, not theirs.
That's why when it comes to managing your wealth, Schwab gives you more choices.
You can invest and trade on your own.
Plus, get advice and more comprehensive wealth solutions to help meet your unique needs.
With award-winning service, low costs and transparent advice, you can manage your wealth your way at Schwab.
Visit Schwab.com to learn more.
This message comes from NPR sponsor Rosetta Stone, an expert in language learning for 30 years.
Right now, NPR listeners can get Rosetta Stone's lifetime membership to 25 different languages for 50 percent off.
Learn more at Rosetta Stone dot com slash NPR.
So let's talk about what's going to happen next.
I mean this is, as you say, not a comprehensive peace agreement but an important, meaningful step.
A lot of humanitarian aid can come in now.
I mean we've already seen chaotic footage of boxes of food being tossed off flatbed trucks.
What's your sense of how this can be funded, organized and effective?
I think the funding question is critically important.
There was a report I had read that we're talking about $70 billion funding. for the reconstruction.
Or maybe it's not even the reconstruction day.
Maybe it's to use the different words, maybe it's the reconstitution of gossip, because I don't know how you reconstruct a situation in which 60 to 80 percent of the housing stock and residential commercial structures have been destroyed.
In order to have any chance of doing that, you really have to deal with the politics and the security issues, because you're going to need a stable, predictable environment in order to deliver, to move from humanitarian assistance delivered on an emergency basis to a organized, developed concept for reconstruction.
And that means three issues.
Number one, How do you deal with the demilitarization, the decommissioning of Hamas's weapons?
Number two, who fills the security vacuum?
Hamas has deployed what several thousand policemen into areas from which the Israelis have urban areas, largely from which the Israelis have redeployed.
That's Hamas in control.
But the 20-point plan talks about an international stabilization force composed, I would gather, from security forces from Arab and Muslim countries.
That's the second issue.
And the third, of course, is who or what is going to govern Gaza?
There's talk of a board of peace meeting with Donald Trump as chairman, and Tony Blair has been mentioned.
What about Palestinian representation?
There's talk of a technocratic government identifying Palestinians that have some degree of legitimacy and credibility.
But what does it actually mean to govern and who do you get to staff up the administrative structure That is going to be required the thousands in order to engage in this process of governance?
You know, in terms of the immediate situation.
I mean, we've seen Hamas fighters emerging in some places, patrolling intersections, getting in gun battles.
And it was interesting that on Monday in Egypt, I believe, Trump was asked about Hamas doing these policing activities.
And he essentially said –
The U.S. was giving them temporary approval.
He said, quote, they've been open about it and we gave them approval for a period of time, unquote.
That's kind of remarkable.
I mean, they're making a virtue out of necessity, I think.
And I think a lot of it flows from one other point which I find extraordinary that, in order to close this deal on Hamas side, Trump authorized Witkoff and Kushner to meet directly with with Khalil al-Hayah, probably the most important external part of the Hamas leadership.
That was extraordinary.
Trump had done it once before in March to openly negotiate, to construct a channel with Hamas.
And the more I think about it, The more I go back to your initial point about Trump's transactional nature.
He's willing to break all kinds of traditional diplomatic crockery.
And I would bet, before this deal progresses substantively, there probably will be other direct meetings between administration officials and Hamas which, of course, is going to drive the Netanyahu government crazy.
I wonder now, just your question prompts the notion that maybe to actually end up doing this deal, the US may have to construct this channel.
You're saying that Trump might have to deal with the Hamas officials that are outside of Gaza.
Do they have a different perspective from those who are actually on the ground?
They're divided as well, but I think they have a much greater sense of wanting to maintain the coherence and the cohesion of the organization itself, which may in fact increase their margin of flexibility.
So I think that's another data point where Trump has gone to where no other American president has been before.
Let's talk a bit about the role of the Gulf states, particularly Qatar, these states that are on the western end of the Persian Gulf.
They played a critical role in pressuring Hamas to accept this deal, I gather at Trump's insistence.
Going forward, what are their interests?
I mean presumably they have resources to fund reconstruction, but what will they want from us?
I might add that before his newly found love affair with the Qataris last year –
I think the president described Qatar as a sponsor of terrorism.
Qatar now, of course, is the president's newfound friend.
You've got the 747, which the president will retrofit and probably try to use.
As the new Air Force One, right?
The new Air Force One.
So Qatar is going to remain, whether its critics like it or not, I suspect, as a key contact point.
They did sign one of the, what, four signatories of the piece of paper that was signed in Sharm.
The Egyptians, the Turks, the Israelis and the Americans.
And that agreement was what?
If you should read it, it's six very, very general paragraphs talking about comedy, the need to resolve problems through negotiations, not by force.
It contains no, not a single detail.
Now, there may be other side agreements of which we're not aware.
It would not be surprising to me if there were.
So the Qataris, the Emiratis, the Saudis, Trump is looking to them, obviously.
And clearly, Trump has no intention of paying for any of this, nor should he, I might add.
This is really a Palestinian issue, needs to be much more tethered to key Arab states that have the resources necessary And the driving interest for stability and, at some point Dave, to try to be as helpful as they can in making sure that Gaza first, which is a necessity, does not become Gaza only.
Meaning that you need a broader agreement.
Meaning we have to move.
Otherwise, I don't want to trivialize this.
Too many lives have been lost.
So many horrors inflicted on October 7th and then on Israel's prosecution of the war.
Thousands of kids losing not just one parent but both.
This parade of horrors if it's left only to Gaza, if it's one and done and Trump having claimed he's resolved seven conflicts, having not resolved any, with the possible exception of giving the Azeris and the Armenians a new pathway forward, he's now added an eighth the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
If there isn't a way to build a bridge from Gaza to a broader process to deal with the core issues that have kept the Israeli-Palestinian conflict alive, then we're going to end up in a deadly and cruel and unforgiving wash, rinse and repeat cycle on this.
We need to take a break here.
Let me reintroduce you.
We are speaking with Aaron David Miller.
He's a former State Department negotiator, currently a senior fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
We'll talk more about the Gaza situation after this short break.
This is Fresh Air.
Support for this podcast and the following message come from Fisher Investments.
SVP Judy Abrams explains the importance of education and resources when it comes to planning to, and through, retirement.
It's interesting.
People put money into their retirement accounts for years, but they have no idea what's supposed to happen when they have to start taking money out.
When I'm speaking to a prospective client for the first time, one of the ways that I work to establish trust is to listen to them.
Is there anything we should know about their spouse or their children, or plans to move or their health?
Our job is to get the full picture.
Then we can take a look at their resources and see if we can improve their situation.
It's far more comprehensive than just managing the money.
When clients realize that we have the resources and the competence to be able to handle a wide array of financial questions, they know they're in good hands.
President Trump's 20-point peace plan.
I mean there's the outlines of something which, to provide governance, there will be a technocratic, apolitical Palestinian committee to actually run Gaza.
Not clear who would appoint it, who it would be.
And then, above that, a supervisory board of peace to oversee the governing committee chaired by President Trump, maybe a leadership role for Tony Blair.
It's going to take a while for all that to develop.
In the meantime, you have tens of thousands of Gazans walking north up to Gaza City who are going to see what they can find.
Many of them will find their homes gone or damaged beyond repair.
If this were a natural disaster on the US coastline –
There would be a government emergency response.
There would be insurance claims.
Do we have any idea what recourse these folks will have in the near term to reconstruct their lives?
I mean I wish I had an answer for that.
I'm sure there are any numbers of plans in NGO, nongovernmental organizations, UN agencies for how to do this.
I mean I'd ask myself the question.
Is it beyond the capacity of the international community to mobilize on an area roughly twice the size of the District of Columbia?
Winter is coming.
The lack of access to potable water, to proper sanitation, to medical care, to a regular food supply, to shelter, to dealing with the psychological trauma of individuals whose entire families have been destroyed.
Large numbers of Horrible surgeries and amputations.
I don't know how to approach this.
Only to answer the question that if in fact this is going to work, then the first phase of this, beyond the president's 20 point plan, has to be a concerted organized determined, focused effort to deal Dave, with the question you just asked, to create some sort of transitional reality.
I mean the anger and the hatred that has been stirred up on the part of Palestinian civilians for what the Israelis have done and for what, in many respects, the Americans have enabled.
Not trying to trivialize or discount the attendant trauma of the shadow of October 7th, which is going to linger and loom over Israel for many years to come.
But in terms of sheer scale, this should be the priority now.
And we're not talking about reconstruction, just trying to figure out how to create a life, something that two million Gazans can somehow manage.
You know, we still have a situation where Israeli armies occupy portions in the east side of Gaza, including some areas that used to be residential.
They are not required by this agreement to leave, right?
Hamas has not been demilitarized.
So there's a real... security issue.
And, you know, President Trump and his team worked really hard to get this far.
And, as you note, it is an important accomplishment to put an end to the fighting and to return the hostages.
But I guess the question is can he apply the same attention and power and will to these other, much tougher questions?
I'm not running in the railroad these days and have no desire to.
But I would not have left Sharm el-Sheikh without constituting four high-level working groups, chaired by a senior American, as part of an interagency American process.
To clarify Sharm El Sheikh, that's the resort in Egypt where, on Monday, international leaders gathered to do something.
Four groups one dedicated to humanitarian assistance and reconstruction, a second to governance, a third to international stabilization and a fourth – and Trump has already moved in this direction by – working with CENTCOM, the American military, to deploy 200 Americans to his early military base near Gaza, which will help monitor the ceasefire.
Well, you know something?
The hardest day after the big peace conference is the morning after.
What do we do now?
How do we make this work?
It's going to take more than Jared Kushner and Steve Witkoff.
It's going to require an interagency international effort to scale this up.
Maybe we'll be surprised.
You know, you worked on the Oslo peace process in the 1990s.
A lot of people won't remember this in any detail.
But it was a long series of negotiations and a lot of interim agreements.
And one of the principles as I recall – was that the parties would not insist on a full and permanent resolution of all the big questions at once, but there would be a series of interim agreements which would, over time, build trust between the two sides and encourage more advanced efforts to diffuse tension, encourage peace, eventually share land.
I'm wondering does that approach make sense to you in retrospect, and is it a guide for how to move forward now?
You know, it certainly wasn't a guide when it came to the success or failure of the Oslo process.
I was at the last, actually the only effort that brought an American president, Bill Clinton, an empowered PLO leader, Yasser Arafat and a very risk-ready Israeli prime minister, Ehud Barak, to Camp David in July of 2000.
That summit failed.
And at the end of that two-week period, on the five core issues that need to be resolved border security refugees, Jerusalem and the end of all conflict and claims.
The gaps between Israelis and Palestinians were as wide and as deep as the Grand Canyon.
Twenty-five years later, those gaps are not Grand Canyon size.
They are galactic in scope.
So the notion that somehow you could leap forward and resolve these core issues in a way that would be acceptable to Israelis and Palestinians, with the shadow of October 7 looming large, strikes me as a idea tethered to a galaxy far, far away rather than to the realities back here on planet Earth.
The 20-point plan is in essence a phased arrangement.
It has a phase one.
People acknowledge it as phase one.
There's even some talk about phase two or three, although there's no real operational detailed roadmap as to how to get from one phase to the other.
If you could get these two parties to actually identify an aspirational end state that they held in common, or even to have an American president at some point.
Identify such an aspirational end state.
I may be one of the last humans on the planet to believe that the only solution to solving this problem is separation through negotiation.
A two-state solution.
Yes.
Yes.
A two-state solution.
It's the only thing to me that answers all of the mail demography, overlapping religious space territory, the need for separation, particularly in the wake of October 7th.
But we can't even do that.
Let's take another break here and let me reintroduce you.
We are speaking with Aaron David Miller.
He's a former State Department negotiator, currently a senior fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
We'll continue our conversation in just a moment.
This is Fresh Air.
This message comes from Michelin.
More than a tire company, Michelin is an innovation company.
From connected mobility to clean materials and now taking on one of the toughest mobility challenges space.
Developing an airless wheel for space exploration, designed to withstand the extreme conditions at the moon's south pole.
Michelin isn't just making exceptional tires, they're helping build a better future.
Motion for life.
More at michelinman.com slash y-michelin slash innovation.
This message comes from Amazon Business.
With smart business buying, get everything you need to grow in one familiar place.
From office supplies to IT essentials and maintenance tools.
Ready to bring your visions to life?
Learn how at amazonbusiness.com.
This message comes from Dell Technologies.
The new Dell PC with Intel Core Ultra helps you fast forward through busy work, leaving more time for you time.
Get a new Dell PC at dell.com slash AI dash PC.
You know, when Trump suggested pardoning Netanyahu at the Knesset on Monday, there was applause.
But you know, once the excitement of the hostage return begins to subside, what kind of support will Netanyahu have in Israel?
So all you need to govern in Israel is 60 plus 1 seats.
And this is a very coherent, cohesive Israeli coalition.
And even though it's a minority government, the two religious parties have now withdrawn over the conscription issue.
The fact that they want to get out of the army free card for most of their haredi, the ultra-Orthodox yeshiva students.
They also know that, going into the wilderness now, with the anger of the Israeli public venting on them because their sons didn't serve, they're going to hang together, as will the two right-wing parties.
And with Trump's support, it is conceivable that Benjamin Netanyahu, already the longest governing prime minister in the history of the state, could win an election with a different government right of center, minus the extremists, two extremist parties.
Accountability, it's hard to believe.
But I don't see anything.
It'll take a government decision to appoint a state commission of inquiry.
And you're talking about holding Netanyahu accountable for the intelligence failures in the 2023 attack.
Right.
The prime minister, Shin Bet, Mossad, DMI, the director of military intelligence, all of that.
There has to be some reckoning.
At a minimum, forget accountability, to understand exactly why.
October 7th was possible and why the Israeli Defense Forces could not save, during the first 24 hours, the civilians in the Gaza envelope communities adjacent to the border.
Trevor Burrus.
You know Trump praised Netanyahu for this agreement and they had the terrific interaction before the Knesset.
But the International Criminal Court still see Netanyahu as a war criminal for the campaign in Gaza.
How does that affect his relationships with Arab allies and prospects for future collaboration?
Peter Robinson.
Look, you know, one of the most disheartening things to me was and I'm very conscious of the fact that in an existential conflict, or one that the party is perceived to be nearly so, the influence of outside actors, however well-intentioned they may be, are minimal.
I still do not understand why, in the course of two years, the international community, key Arab states both Israel's treaty partners and Abraham Accord country partners and the United States failed to impose a single cost or consequence.
A single cost or consequence.
That would have altered the trajectory of either of these combatants.
And the International Court of Justice will continue to debate and will at some point make a judgment on the issue of genocide.
That's not going to solve or fix anything.
I would have argued that, instead of virtue signaling and doing performative things on the issue of Palestinian statehood, Europeans ought to have looked at their relationship with Israel.
Second largest trading block is the EU.
Europeans did nothing.
The Germans imposed a partial arms embargo and yet they're buying 4 billion of aero defense systems from the Israelis.
So Israel's brand and the impact of what the Israelis have done in Gaza, That issue is going to reverberate for years.
And whether Israel's brand can be reconstituted will depend almost completely, I think, on whether or not you can actually have a new generation of Israeli leaders that will emerge.
You've been at the project of peace in this region for much, maybe most of your professional life.
In the 90s, there seemed to be a real moment of hope for a solution.
Different situation today.
Can you still find reasons for hope?
I can't.
Let me sum it up.
Jack Kennedy described himself as an idealist without illusion.
That's where I am.
And frankly, that's where I think anybody interested seriously in working on this issue needs to be.
If you only accept things the way the world is, things never change.
And if you only accept things the way you want them to be, you're going to fail.
It is the balance between the world the way it is and the aspirations of what we want for a better world, better America.
Conflict-ending solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
That's where we need to be.
And you give me Dave, you give me the leaders— leaders who are masters of their political constituencies, not prisoners of their ideologies.
Leaders who are willing to recognize that not only do their own needs need to be requited, but the needs and requirements of others.
You give me those two leaders and you give me an American mediator who's prepared to apply a lot of honey and a lot of vinegar, and I'll give you a chance a serious chance— to end the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
Well, Aaron David Miller, thanks so much for speaking with us.
Dave, it was great.
I really enjoyed it.
Aaron David Miller is a former State Department negotiator and is currently a senior fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for Peace.
We recorded our conversation yesterday morning.
Since then, a dispute has arisen between Israel and Hamas over the pace of returning the bodies of deceased hostages.
That dispute has slowed some of the aid coming into Gaza.
Meanwhile, President Trump has told Hamas to disarm, or quote we will disarm them, and it'll happen quickly and perhaps violently unquote.
Hamas has so far not committed to do so.
On tomorrow's show we hear from Julian Brave Noisecat, son of an indigenous Canadian father and white mother.
He co-directed an Oscar-nominated documentary about abuse at missionary boarding schools.
Native children were required to attend and he's written a new memoir.
I hope you can join us.
Thank you.
Our digital media producer is Molly C.V.
Nesper.
Our consulting visual producer is Hope Wilson.
Roberta Shorrock directs the show.
For Terry Gross and Tonya Mosley, I'm Dave Davies.
This message comes from NPR sponsor, 1Password.
Protect your digital life with 1Password.
If you're tired of family members constantly texting you for the passwords to streaming services, 1Password lets you securely share or remove access to logins.
Access from any device, anytime.
1Password lets you securely switch between iPhone Android, Mac and PC, with convenient features like autofill for quick sign-ins.
Right now, get a free two-week trial for you and your family at 1Password.com slash NPR.
This message comes from Michelin.
More than a tire company, Michelin is an innovation company.
From connected mobility to clean materials and now taking on one of the toughest mobility challenges space.
Developing an airless wheel for space exploration, designed to withstand the extreme conditions at the moon's south pole.
Michelin isn't just making exceptional tires, they're helping build a better future.
Motion for life.
More at michelinman.com slash y-michelin slash innovation.
