There was a problem when we approached 2012, December 21, 2012.
When you approached me, it was quite surprising that you had the kind of disclosures that you have and some of the background that you have.
I do want to say that we're in a public place here, but we are forced to be in this kind of a public place for a number of reasons that I can't explain on camera.
But take it from me, there's a purpose for this.
And that's because the information in this interview needs extra caution.
Minutes later, something strange happened.
Once you hear what he's about to say, the timing of those helicopters won't feel random anymore.
We have had to move from our location where we were, to a more private situation in order to take this testimony, because we have been overflown by repeated number of helicopters that simply did not want to go away.
They were there long before the interview.
Let me be straight with you.
While working on this video, some of the things I found really shook my sense of reality a bit.
It might do the same for you, but I'd honestly recommend watching until the end because it gets very, very interesting.
Before we continue, there's something important you should hear, especially with the year ending.
2025 is almost over and we're falling into the same trap again, waiting for January 1st to start something new or learn a new skill.
But here's the truth, you don't need a new year to make a new start.
AI was one of the most in-demand skills of 2025, according to the World Economic Forum, yet most of us didn't learn it.
And that puts us at risk, not just of falling behind, but of being replaced.
You still have 45 days to learn AI and step into 2026 as a more skilled, smarter and employable individual.
That too, in just two days.
Let me tell you about the two-day live AI mastermind training by Outskill, the world's first AI-focused educational platform, happening this Saturday and Sunday, 10am to 7pm Eastern Time on both days.
And the timing is perfect because they have their year-end holiday offer going on, so you can get in absolutely for free instead of the usual 395.
Outskill is rated 49 out of 5 on Trustpilot, and this 16-hour live experience by them has been attended by more than 10 million worldwide professionals like you.
Across fields like marketing finance, engineering and data, mentored directly by AI experts from companies like Microsoft and Nvidia.
The best part?
This training isn't just about learning tools.
It's about changing the way you work.
You'll learn how to use AI to simplify your daily tasks.
Build AI agents that plan, create, and automate your workflows.
Design AI automations that connect tools like Sheets, Notion, and CRMs to save hours.
Gain ready-to-use AI systems for your job, business, or freelance projects.
But learning those skills isn't just enough.
The most important part is knowing how to monetize them.
OutSkills learners have launched AI-powered businesses that even built weekly revenue models worth 4K to 5K.
Not just that you'll receive bonuses worth 5000, including a prompt bible, a roadmap to monetize AI and a personal AI toolkit builder.
Only if you attend both the days.
This Christmas, gift this opportunity to someone who you think could benefit from learning AI, as it could change their career in 2026.
Seats are limited.
Grab yours now via the link in the description.
P.S.
Join the WhatsApp community to stay updated before the big blast.
Big thanks to Outskill for supporting the channel.
One of the caveats that I do have some personal information that I did get personally involved in was some information that had to do with Stargates and Looking Glass and, more specifically, the 2012 problem with those projects.
The well, I guess popular opinion of what's out there right now is that the project was shut down because there was a problem when we approached 2012.
This is a 2012 Project Camelot interview with Carrie Cassidy and Bill Wood, a former Navy member, who said he had access to information far outside the public eye.
At that time, people were already talking about 2012, but Bill claimed the real concern wasn't a prophecy or a calendar date.
It was a classified program the public almost never heard about.
It was called Project Looking Glass, a secret program built around a controlled setup where they tested how different decisions could change what comes next.
It wasn't one machine. but an entire process.
They would adjust certain conditions, introduce a possible choice and then watch how the timeline shifted.
The goal wasn't to predict the future like a fortune teller.
The goal was to see how the future reacts when the present changes.
Almost like watching reality update itself based on every decision made.
The timelines converge on that point in time.
And when you know enough about the Stargate projects and the Looking Glass project to know how string theory works and how the possibility of possibilities works and how making one choice over here doesn't necessarily mean the other choice couldn't exist at the same time.
But once you get your brain wrapped around this subject, you find out that at the end of 2012, In an easy way to put it the choices that we make become less and less consequential to the future.
And eventually we're pushed into this bottleneck of time, no matter which choice we make.
What Bill is describing here is the main flaw behind the technology they were using.
The idea was this.
They would feed different choices into the system.
Things like, what happens if we choose X?
Or what happens if we choose Y? and the machine would show the most likely future for each choice.
At first, it looked extremely convincing.
If one option showed a 79 chance of happening and the other showed 21, they assumed the 79.
Outcome was basically guaranteed.
In other words, they believed the machine could calculate the future like a probability chart.
The same way weather forecasts or simulations work.
But what they didn't realize was that these probabilities could change very fast once real people, free will and real world actions started influencing the situation.
Something that looked almost certain at one moment could shift completely a short time later.
Bill's point is simple they were treating the numbers as fixed when, in reality, the future was still flexible.
So the big mistake wasn't the data, it was believing that the data could not change.
This created a false sense of certainty and that's why everything started to fall apart later.
What happened was people, very smart people, began to figure out that something big was coming up.
Something that made it so.
All the possibilities of all the future scenarios, of any choice, any possibility that was fed in and observed through the looking glass inherently ended up in the same future.
And no decision, no possibility changed past a certain point.
That's the big secret.
It well coincides with December 21st, 2012.
Bill says that as they kept testing the machine, something strange started happening.
No matter what scenario they entered, all timelines were ending in the same future.
Normally, when you test different choices, you expect different results, different paths, different outcomes.
But at a certain point around the end of 2012, every path, every possibility, every simulation started showing the same ending.
That's what he means when he says all possible timelines lead to the same basic set of history.
To the people running the project, This was terrifying.
Why?
Because it meant they had lost control.
It didn't matter what they did, what decisions they made, or what plans they tried to execute.
The machine kept showing the same final outcome.
So, the big secret wasn't that the future could be predicted.
The big secret was that the future seemed locked and nothing they did could change the direction things were heading.
This is the moment where the people in charge started to panic, not because they knew what was coming, but because they couldn't stop it.
The people that know everything about Looking Glass, that have gotten all the reports and all the information.
The elites of the world probably figured out that that was the end of the game.
Nothing could be manipulated beyond that point.
The people who had full access to the Looking Glass data eventually realized something unsettling.
The machine kept giving them the same answer over and over again, an outcome they did not want.
For years, they believed the future could be shaped, influenced, or redirected.
But once the timelines started converging, the technology stopped giving them the results they were hoping for.
Every test ended the same way.
Every scenario collapsed into the same final point.
Phil says that this was the moment when those in control understood they had reached the end of the game, a point beyond which their influence no longer mattered.
And here's the part that raises the real question.
If they didn't like the answer, did they try finding a way to change the entire phenomenon?
If a tool that once worked was suddenly useless, it's only natural to imagine that they would search for another method, another technology capable of pushing reality in a different direction or at least delaying the outcome they feared.
If they were looking for a way to override or bypass the convergence of timelines.
There is one project people often point to because of its timing, scale and ambition.
A project designed to manipulate the smallest building blocks of reality itself.
And that brings us to CERN.
What about the notion that CERN, for example, is engaged in trying to beat that game, as you call it?
I would say, look at the problems CERN has had.
The crazy little things that have kept that project from moving forward.
Certainly they have never even come close to getting that project to the level they want it to be, to do what they really want to do with it.
Okay, well what about the notion that that's the party line, that they haven't been able to do so.
If you really think about it, that's what they would prefer people believe, so that they don't think that there's a threat.
Listen to the interviews of the scientists that are working on the project.
Even they say that it seems like somebody or something from the future won't let them get that project done.
This interview happened in 2012.
At that time, CERN was already a massive scientific organization, founded in 1954, and had become the world's largest particle physics laboratory.
But what most people don't realize is that the machine everyone talks about, the Large Hadron Collider, only became fully operational in 2008, just a few years before Bill's testimony.
In simple terms, this machine does one thing.
It accelerates tiny particles to almost the speed of light and smashes them together.
When they collide, they break into even smaller pieces, allowing scientists to study the fundamental structure of reality, the particles and forces that existed right after the Big Bang.
It's like a giant microscope.
But instead of using lenses and light, it uses extreme collisions to reveal the building blocks of the universe.
And yes, CERN did face real, documented problems.
In its first years they dealt with overheating magnets, electrical faults, leaks and unexpected shutdowns that forced the entire collider to stop multiple times.
These weren't hidden events. were public technical failures that slowed down the project.
The official purpose of the LHC has always been straightforward.
To understand matter, energy, and the origins of the universe.
Nothing mystical.
Nothing dramatic.
Just high-energy physics pushing technology to its limit.
But the timing is what makes people curious.
Bill was talking about timelines converging in 2012.
CERN was pushing the collider to its highest power levels in the exact same period.
And for many people online, the overlap between the two stories raises a simple question.
Were they just studying reality or trying to push against something much bigger?
At a certain point, after they're done hearing the computer tell them this is what's going to happen over and over and over and over again.
All they become focused on is how do we fix it?
Why, what is the this that's going to happen?
The inevitable... contraction of the timelines.
The idea described here is that at a certain point, all timelines begin moving toward the same outcome, because people's awareness naturally increases.
According to Bill, this isn't an ending or a collapse.
It's an awakening.
A moment where more people start seeing things clearly, questioning what they're told and understanding information that once felt hidden or confusing.
And once this process begins, it can't really be stopped.
The old ways of shaping or influencing the future don't work the same, because people become harder to mislead.
If this awakening, as Bill describes it, is real, then some of the strange things people notice today become more interesting.
The Mandela Effect, for example, when large groups of people remember something differently than how it appears now, is often discussed as a possible sign that something isn't aligning perfectly in our timeline.
A short example.
Many people vividly remember Mandela dying in the 1980s, even though the official date is 2013.
It doesn't prove anything, but it does make people wonder why these differences are so widespread.
These mismatched memories are often compared to small glitches, tiny hints that the timeline may have shifted or changed direction at some point.
Logos that look different than people remember.
Movie lines that suddenly don't match the version in their heads.
Details that feel off.
Even if there are normal explanations, the pattern itself leaves people with questions.
This idea connects back to converging timelines.
If reality did shift toward a single direction, some small details might not have carried over perfectly, which could explain why certain memories no longer match what we see today.
Seen this way, the awakening Bill talks about becomes easy to understand.
More clarity, more awareness, more people paying attention in a future that's harder to control through confusion or uncertainty.
Is it your understanding that the notion that looking glass has been?
You know that there are various looking glasses around the globe supposedly that, according to Dan Burish, were shut down.
Is it your understanding they're actually not shut down?
I believe that they're shut down because they are all saying the same thing and they're completely useless at this point.
It's like the wicked witch looking into the magic mirror and always getting the same answer.
If you were always getting the exact opposite of the answer that you wanted, you'd stop talking to the mirror.
And that's essentially what happened with Looking Glass is no longer.
Not only did they not want people to use it anymore, because they knew it was just gonna burp out the same thing, but at the same time they didn't want anybody else to know what it was saying.
I'm sure because-.
Because that information was monumental concern when I was in the military about how to prevent this inevitability.
When he talks about the end of their world, the meaning is not about destruction or collapse.
It refers to the end of an old system, a system built on secrecy, influence and controlling what people know or believe.
In his view, a large awakening doesn't mean chaos.
It means that more people begin to see things for what they really are.
They recognize patterns, they understand how information works and they become harder to steer in any direction that isn't genuinely aligned with their own thinking.
A ship like this doesn't happen all at once.
It grows slowly, person by person, until it reaches a point where the old methods simply stop working.
The world that ends is the one where a small group can shape the larger picture without being questioned, and the world that begins is one where people think more independently, ask better questions and rely less on the stories they are given.
From this perspective, the real change is inside people, not outside.
It's a change in clarity, awareness, and the ability to recognize when something doesn't add up.
And once enough people reach that level, the entire structure of influence loses its strength.
Not because someone fought it, but because people no longer respond to it the same way.
We as human beings are far more capable of using many, many advanced skills beyond five senses.
With a little bit of training and the knowledge that it was actually possible, most people could accurately predict the possibilities of the future.
Do you feel that you were enhanced physically?
No, I have had a device implanted in me and I later was of the understanding that that device did not do what I was told it was doing.
It was not to provide enhancement, it was to provide monitoring.
You were never told that the actual belief in what you were doing was giving you the ability.
What's being described here is a psychological mechanism, not a technological one.
The device that was implanted wasn't meant to give anyone special abilities.
It was meant to make them believe they had those abilities.
And once someone believes something strongly enough, Their mind can unlock skills they didn't realize they already had.
The point is simple.
The belief itself was the real trigger.
By giving someone a piece of metal and telling them it was enhancing their abilities, the instructors could activate confidence, focus and intuition.
Things the human mind is already capable of, but rarely uses consciously.
It's similar to a placebo effect.
The object doesn't do anything, but the belief in the object changes the person's behavior and performance.
And here's the important detail.
If a person learns that their abilities come from their own mind, you can't take those abilities away.
But if they believe their power comes from the device, then removing the device removes the ability.
This made belief a tool. a way to control when someone felt capable and when they didn't.
The meaning behind all this is very straightforward.
Humans already have mental capacities far beyond what they normally access.
But in many cases we only unlock them when we believe something external gives us permission to do so.
The biggest cherry on top of all this conversation would be a synopsis to say that if I could convince everybody out there that, for all intents and purposes, what we believe to be true eventually becomes true,
If somebody convinces us that a major disaster is going to happen in the very near future.
A major disaster happens in the very near future.
If we don't buy into that fear and accept that there's really nothing that we know, know is going to happen, and accept of whatever happens, that makes the convergence of the timelines happen as naturally as possible.
It's honestly difficult to accept the idea that there could be multiple timelines.
We don't have a clear way to confirm something like that, and most of us were never taught to even consider it a real possibility.
But when you hear these explanations, they stay with you.
At least, they stayed with me.
I kept thinking about them long after I finished watching the interview, and the more I thought about it, the more it shook my sense of what's real and what isn't.
Not in a dramatic way, but in a quiet, unsettling way that makes you question how much of reality we actually understand.
And maybe that's the strangest part.
Because if we can't fully explain the world we're in, then the anomalies people notice today, the inconsistencies, the odd memories, the little things that don't add up, become much harder to ignore.
Take the Mandela Effect, not as proof of anything supernatural, but as something that simply doesn't fit, something no one can fully explain.
Millions of people remembering the same thing in a different way.
Details that don't match.
Events that feel shifted.
No matter how many theories exist, none of them explain everything.
And that's exactly what makes it so fascinating.
Because if reality really did shift direction, if timelines really did merge, then anomalies like these might be the fingerprints left behind, small signs that something changed in a way.
We didn't notice at the time.
And honestly, that's the part that intrigues me the most.
The fact that nobody truly understands why these differences exist, yet everyone feels that something about them is not normal.
If you made it all the way here, I really appreciate it.
You're probably already subscribed, and if you haven't thought about hitting the like button, maybe you'll do it now.
Thanks for watching.
Until next time.
