Hi, I am Lacey Lamar, and I'm also Lacey Lamar.
Just kidding, I'm Amber Ruffin.
Okay everybody, we have exciting news to share.
We're back with season two of the Amber and Lacey Lacey and Amber show on Will Ferrell's Big Money Players Network.
This season, we make new friends, deep dive into my steamy DM's, answer your listener questions and more.
The more is punch each other.
Listen to the Amber and Lacey Lacey and Amber show on Will Ferrell's Big Money Players Network on the iHeartRadio app Apple Podcasts or wherever you get your podcasts.
Just listen, okay. Or Lacey gets to do it.
Hi, I'm David Eagleman from the podcast, Inner Cosmos, which recently hit the number one science podcast in America.
I'm a neuroscientist at Stanford and I've spent my career exploring the three pound universe in our heads.
Join me weekly to explore the relationship between your brain and your life, because the more we know about what's running under the hood, the better we can steer our lives.
Listen to Inner Cosmos with David Eagleman on the iHeartRadio app Apple Podcasts or wherever you get your podcasts.
Hi there friends, it's me Josh and for this week's select, I've chosen our September 2019 episode on government shutdowns.
Sadly, this is such a perennial topic we should rerelease it every couple months.
It's a good thing to understand so that you can be good and ticked off at your elected officials anytime a shutdown happens.
Because as we learned in this episode, they are totally avoidable.
So enjoy, I guess. Welcome to Stuff You Should Know, a production of iHeartRadio.
Hey and welcome to the podcast.
I'm Josh Clark and there's Charles W.
Chuck Bryant and there's Jerry over there and this is the podcast.
Like I said, in particular, it's the Stuff You Should Know podcast.
So if that's not what you're here to listen to, you're in the wrong place.
And if you don't wanna listen to us talk about government shutdowns, then you're in the wrong place.
But who doesn't wanna know about government shutdowns?
Yeah, I agree, educate yourselves.
Right, as a matter of fact.
Cause it's gonna happen again soon enough.
That's exactly right.
That is why I wanted to do this episode.
Cause I've been meaning for us to do this for years now and every time we do it and it's like, every time I go to do it, say, let's do a government shutdown episode, I think is what I'm trying to say.
Sorry, I just drank a Red Bull cause I was about to fall over and now I'm talking really fast.
Just give me like 10 minutes.
Okay, and you're drinking a Coca -Cola.
Well, we don't have Coke Zero here anymore.
This is all we have.
You want that extra caffeine kick on top of the Red Bull.
I think I have, just this 12 ounce can, it's not even gone and I think I've burned a hole in my stomach.
It's crazy. But delicious.
It is delicious, I'll give you that.
But Coke Zero is really delicious too for being a diet cola.
At any rate, government shutdowns.
You were saying, yeah, every time we go to do this.
The government shuts down, so it looks like we're chasing a trend.
So we have to wait, and I'm like, finally, the time is right.
Because it wouldn't be cool to do one in the midst of one, is that the deal?
No, definitely not.
No, that's like buying a T -shirt at a concert and then putting that T -shirt on and looking around like, yeah.
At the concert, with that horrible smell.
That new T -shirt, especially concert T -shirts.
They're printed out of straight chemicals.
Out of Buffalo Bill's basement, made of skin.
Man, he's been on my mind a lot.
Because of the egg -gien episode?
Well, because of that.
And then I just saw on the movie crushers page, someone posted a funny little thing that was a Buffalo Bill Tinder profile.
It was really funny.
I gotta do that. And then there was something else from this past weekend.
It was a lot of Buffalo Bill happening.
He's everywhere. Yeah.
Remember we used to send each other that one screenshot?
Yeah. That was great.
Back when we shared a cubicle wall.
I know, and it was easy enough to do that.
Back in the day. Now we have gold -plated, air -on chairs.
And no walls anywhere.
I'd take a regular air -on.
I think that's what you're sitting in right now.
Oh, is it? No, it's quite comfy.
So anyway, welcome to the podcast.
I'm Josh. There's Chuck.
We should edit all that other stuff out, don't you think?
Or get money from Red Bull, Coca -Cola, and air -on.
You're right. And Buffalo Bill.
Right. Or the Buffalo Bills football team.
Dang, man, you just really pulled it together with that last one.
So we've been through some shutdowns in our time, Chuck.
Sure, in our day. Yeah.
As a matter of fact, you'd think based on how common they kind of seem.
I mean, every few years, there's like the federal government.
I should say for our fellow listeners outside of the United States - Our government is broken.
Right. We're talking about government shutdowns, and it's a lot like what it sounds like.
I mean, we'll get to the nuts and bolts of it, obviously.
But it's basically where the federal government, not state governments, but the federal USA government.
Yeah. Parts of it just stop functioning.
Right. And the reason they stop functioning is because those agencies, those parts of the federal government have not been funded, and since they haven't been funded by law, by congressional act from years back, they are not allowed to pay workers any longer.
They're not even allowed to accept volunteer work from their workers.
So with no workers, that means the agency shuts down.
And that's a government shutdown.
That's what we're talking about.
Literally parts of the government shutdown.
Yeah, and again, we will get into all the nuts and bolts, but it shuts down because of funding gaps, and those funding gaps happen almost always because of entrenched politics.
Yeah, it's two sides playing chicken over the budget.
Right. And when the government shutdown happens, neither side blinked.
Right, and it's also very important to point out that a big part of government shutdowns is trying to get the other side to maybe not accept blame because no one ever does, it seems like.
But at least the perception in the general media that this person or this side is the one to blame.
Yeah, and more often than not, public polling shows that it's Congress that almost always takes to blame.
Oh, really? Until this last one, it was always Congress.
Right. No matter what.
Which is funny that they would try to pull this off because it's so politically risky, because it's so damaging on an individual level among federal employees or just average Americans, but also on a national level.
Yeah, our economy takes a huge hit.
Huge hit that we just never regain.
All right, and that's a great setup.
I think so too. So, Chuck, to start, I think we should talk about how money moves around the federal government, don't you?
Yeah, and this is, again, if you live outside the country, and even if you live in the United States, you may not understand what power of the purse means, but in the United States and in the US Constitution, Article I, Section IX, Clause 7.
Yeah, not even the Bill of Rights, like the Constitution.
This was one of the first things they thought about.
It was Congress who was granted control over the money.
So, the president can't just fund something, the Senate can't just fund something.
Everything has to be agreed on, and they can't spend a dime without Congress's express approval through this process we're gonna get into called appropriations.
Right, and so, in the Constitution, it just said Congress is the one that approves all money.
Everything comes through Congress, right?
Yeah, we should read that though, because it does have one funny line.
You go ahead. And from the Constitution, no money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in consequence of the appropriations made by law, so far so good, and a regular statement of account of receipts and expenditures of all money shall be published from time to time.
It's very nonspecific.
Whenever you get to it.
Why not like in November of every year?
I honestly don't know, because from time to time makes it seem unimportant.
It makes it seem, what's the word when you don't have to do something?
Makes it seem non -mandatory.
Yeah, optional. Optional.
Sure, that's the word.
Right, I know you so well, after all these years.
So that's the, it's from Article One of the Constitution.
And presidents from 1778 onward said, okay, I can work with that.
There's a huge loophole here.
Like no, I can't, you know, spend money myself.
Like I can't pay anybody myself, I have to wait for Congress.
But that doesn't mean I can't like get the work done first.
And then when it comes time to pay, I can just direct this contractor, vendor, whoever, militiamen to Congress to go get money.
Yeah, which is really, I mean, that is so United States government to be like, well, I'm technically not writing the check.
I've just engaged someone services and now we owe them this money.
Yeah, Congress pay this guy.
He's, yeah, yeah, he did what he's saying he did.
And so there was this representative in Virginia who was not happy about this, this kind of precedent that had been adopted by the executive branch.
This representative said in 1806 that presidents were acting like a saucy boy, whose wealthy grandfather was going to cover his needs.
And that that was the case.
So eventually Congress said, we got to close this loophole.
And they did in 1884, I think.
Yeah, the Anti -Deficiency Act, basically said, no, you can't just pay the guy to paint your house and then stand there tapping your toes, looking at the guy with the checkbook.
Right, exactly. As a matter of fact, they said, you can't spend a single dime that Congress hasn't already appropriated for that.
That's right. You just can't do it.
So much so that again, you can't even accept volunteer work unless it is basically to protect life or public safety.
Something really, really important.
But when we say we fund you, Congress funds the executive branch, all the agencies in the federal government, we really mean it.
And that's what the Anti -Deficiency Act really said.
Yeah, but it would take until 1974 when Richard Nixon signed the Congress Budget and Impoundment Control Act.
It's a barn burner.
Yeah, but that's what really changed everything.
And that's what kind of laid out this process that we still work with today.
Or don't work with.
Or sit on our hands and hold our breath.
Right, ideally it functions kind of clunky even in its best form.
But purposefully so.
It's to keep Congress from being profligate with its spending, right?
Like, I mean, it's to say, this group over here and this group over here, we're taking the same task and making you guys do it twice separately and then come together and hammer out the details.
Yeah, it's really discouraging to look at the history of our country and the idea should be that, all right, we know that in this country, we have a lot of people that feel one way about a lot of stuff, a lot of people that feel the other way.
And the government's job should be to come together and negotiate and find nice middle grounds.
And it seems like it's more like the government just finds loopholes and is sneaky and underhanded to find workarounds from actually trying to work together and find a middle ground.
Right. It stinks. It does stink a little bit.
Sick of it. I'm pretty fed up with government too.
I think most people in America, and I would gather the UK too.
All right, oh man, especially right now.
So here's how it happens.
Every year, the two chambers of Congress, they have to agree on a budget for the discretionary spending, which is, I think only 30 % of the overall budget is discretionary.
Everything else is mandatory or non -discretionary.
And that means stuff that you just can't not pay for.
And it's mostly things like Medicaid, Medicare, Social Security entitlement programs to where these are mandatory programs that are created by an act of Congress that says whatever these programs need to run and operate, that's how much Congress gives them.
There's no spending levels, there's no, what about this?
You can go in and monkey with the operation by congressional act, but as far as spending and budget goes, whatever they need they get.
That's right. The other stuff, the discretionary stuff, that's what'd you say about 30 % of the budget?
It's 30%, but that's still like in 2018, that was $1 .2 trillion, and it's really important stuff.
It's not like the mandatory spending is the only important stuff.
We're talking about the FDA, Homeland Security, TSA, the NIH, National Parks, the IRS.
The Department of Defense?
Yeah, big time stuff.
Basically everything except Social Security, Medicaid and Medicare.
Oh really, is that 70 %?
Jeez. I know. I know.
All right, so this all starts this appropriations process.
It's laid out for the first Monday in February, and this is the deadline.
It lines up with the deadline for the president to submit their budget to Congress, which you always hear this is a president's budget.
The president oversees stuff and approves stuff, but the president's not in there with the calculator crunching numbers.
No, no, no, it's the Office of Management and Budget that does it for the president, but it's under the president's direction.
The president says, I really wanna do this, but I don't wanna do this anymore.
But the thing is, it's almost like a little kid going through the Montgomery Ward wish book and then writing their list in crayon that has about the same polling power as the president's budget.
It really is saying this is what the president wants to do, and then Congress either says these are good ideas or they say we're not listening to that at all because it's not legally binding in any way.
There's probably, in fact, party line templates that they just throw down, like a mad lib.
And they tweak it a little bit, but they say like, oh, here's the Republican style budget and here's the Democratic style budget, Obama or Trump, and now do your minor tweaks.
I think that is kind of, it's gotta be because it's a huge, massive document.
Yeah, they can't start from scratch every time, can they?
No, it's gotta be like the first few pages are what really count, you know what I mean?
It's gotta be. But again, this is like, they call it in this article like the wish list of funding priorities, and that's a good way to put it.
The Montgomery Ward wish book wish list.
Do you remember that?
I was a Sears kid. I didn't discriminate, I went through all of them to make sure I had all my bases covered.
Yeah, we didn't even have Montgomery Ward, so I've never laid eyes upon that catalog.
It was, it was good, it was a good one.
I put it up against the Sears one.
Yeah, we had Sears and then I guess service merchandise was another big one.
Oh, I remember that.
Didn't they sell everything from like diamond rings to Casio keyboards?
They sold everything, I think I bought my very first guitar from service merchandise.
Oh, nice. And returned it like a week later because it was cruddy.
And I went to a real guitar store.
Sam Ash? No, actually, I remember.
I went to Dirt Cheap Music on Memorial Drive.
It's not there anymore.
Shop local. Yeah, Dirt Cheap.
Buzz marketing for a business that is no longer around.
So they've got this wish list, then it goes on to Congress and they have to pass what's called a concurrent budget resolution.
Right, and Congress can totally ignore the President's budget.
Sure. They can take it into consideration.
If Congress is controlled by the same party the President is, the President's wishes are probably going to be taken into consideration.
But ultimately, Congress says this is what we want to do.
And from what I can tell when they come up with this concurrent budget, right?
Yeah, concurrent budget.
A CBSR concurrent budget resolution.
It's basically just setting the spending for the year, right, that's all that is.
Isn't it like the cap on what the federal government can spend entirely?
I think so. It's just that broad agreement of the total amount of spending.
Okay, and then it starts to get divvied up.
Yeah, they're not in the weeds at this point.
No. But they're supposed to pass that by mid -April.
And that's where they set these spending levels for 20 categories.
And this is where it starts to break down, or not break down but, like in a bad way, but they start to break it down because it's such a massive thing, you gotta break it down into smaller departments.
Right, so Congress says here's the total amount of money that we're gonna spend this year.
And it goes to the Appropriations Committee in the Senate and the Appropriations Committee in the House.
And then each of them says, okay, we've got this hole.
Let's divvy it up into 12 slices.
Not necessarily equal slices.
I think they'd probably be pretty lazy.
But they say, you know, agriculture and rural development, you're going to get this much this year.
Commerce, justice, and science.
You're going to get this much, like this slice of the pie.
And they do that over 12 departments that roughly correspond to the different cabinet posts in the federal government.
That's right, and it's up to those subcommittees, those 12 different ones, once they get their little slice of pie, to then decide how to eat that pie.
Yeah, I think there's an Appropriations Subcommittee that says this is how you're going to spend this.
That's right. And they have hearings and stuff like that where the heads of these departments come and say, we really need this.
We've got some really exciting stuff coming up.
Give us some more money.
We figured out how to ride sharks and hunt dolphins with spear guns, and we really want to get into that this year.
Or, we really need to build this thing, or the military really needs to upgrade that thing.
Stuff like that. And then these Appropriations Subcommittees, each one dedicated to a group of agencies, or an agency, just a single one, say, okay, this is how we're going to spend this money.
That's right. And then once that happens in the House, and the same thing happens in the Senate, those two groups, the Appropriations Subcommittees, for each of these 12 slices of pie come together.
Ideally. And they say, well, we came up with this.
What'd you guys come up with?
And they say, well, we came up with this, and we're off by seven billion dollars.
How are we going to figure this out?
That's great, only seven billion dollars.
Right, that's nothing these days.
Well, they negotiate with each other to come up with a joint spending bill.
I imagine those meetings are contentious and tough.
And eventually though, ideally, they negotiate that spending bill, then that gets sent to the President, and they can veto that or sign that.
Right, so remember, there's actually 24 of these going on over 12 different slices of pie.
And when they come back together and form 12 different Appropriations resolutions, they can say, we're done, this is good, let's send it to the President, and the President can sign that.
If things are going along really smoothly and Congress wants to show off, they'll say, we want to get all these together in one package, we're going to present all 12 to the President, and the President can either sign or veto them.
So the President can sign or veto each one separately in small groups or as a whole.
As a whole, it's called omnibus.
Yeah, if you've ever heard the term omnibus spending bill and you're like, what in the world is that?
That just means it's everything grouped together.
Right, and so one reason that you would go through the headache of trying to put all 12 of those Appropriations bills into one package is that if there's something in one of those Appropriations bills that you want out, you got a lot more leverage than the other 11 that you can trade from the budget
as a whole to get that thing out or get this thing in.
If it's one Appropriations bill, you have much less leverage.
So that's why they would go to that trouble.
But that's fairly rare, I believe.
Yeah, and this is all due by October 1st because that is the beginning of the federal government's fiscal year, is October 1.
And since we've been doing this in modern times, I believe 1977 was when we started this process.
Congress has passed all 12 by October 1st by that deadline, only four times.
Four times. That's right.
So, we'll take a break and we'll discuss what happens all of the other times, right after this.
["BODY AND SOUL"] Hi everyone, it's me, Katie Couric.
Have you heard about my newsletter called Body and Soul?
It has everything you need to know about your physical and mental health.
Personally, I'm overwhelmed by the wellness industry.
I mean, there's so much information out there about lifting weights, pelvic floors, cold plunges, anti -aging, so I launched Body and Soul to share doctor -approved insights about all of that and more.
We're tackling everything.
Serums to use through menopause, exercises that improve your brain health, and how to naturally lower your blood pressure and cholesterol.
Oh, and if you're as sore as I am from pickleball, we'll help you with that too.
Most importantly, it's information you can trust.
Everything is vetted by experts at the top of their field, and you can write into them directly to have your questions answered.
So, sign up for Body and Soul at katikouric .com slash bodyandsoul.
Taking better care of yourself is just a click away.
How do you feel about biscuits?
Hi, I'm Akilah Hughes, and I'm so excited about my new podcast, Rebel Spirit, where I head back to my hometown in Kentucky and try to convince my high school to change their racist mascot, the Rebels, into something everyone in the South loves, the biscuits.
I was a lady rebel.
Like, what does that even mean?
I mean, the Boone County Rebels will stay the Boone County Rebels, but the image of...
It's right here in black and white in Prince.
They lions. An individual that came to the school saying that God sent him to talk to me about the mascot switch is a leader who choose hills that you want to die on.
Why would we want to be the losing team?
Literally, I'd just take all the other stuff out of home.
Segregation academies.
When civil rights said that we need to integrate public schools, these charter schools were exempt from these.
Bigger than a flag or mascot.
You have to be ready for a serious backlash.
Listen to Rebel Spirit on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
I'm Dr. Laurie Santos, host of The Happiness Lab podcast.
As the US elections approach...
One good childish nickname.
It can feel like we're angrier and more divided than ever.
Please stick to policy.
Don't get personal.
But in a new hopeful season of my podcast, I'll share what the science really shows, that we're surprisingly more united than most people think.
We all know something is wrong in our culture, in our politics, and that we need to do better and that we can do better.
With the help of Stanford psychologist Jamil Zaki...
It's really tragic if cynicism were a pill.
It'd be a poison. We'll see that our fellow humans, even those we disagree with, are more generous than we assume.
My assumption, my feeling, my hunch, is that a lot of us are actually looking for a way to disagree and still be in relationships with each other.
All that on The Happiness Lab.
Listen on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to podcasts.
MTV's Official Challenge podcast is back for another season.
That's right. The challenge is about to embark on its monumental 40th season, y 'all, and we are coming along for the ride.
Woohoo! That would be me, Devin Simone.
And then there's me, Damon Rogers.
And we're here to take you behind the scenes of...
Drum roll, please. Na, na, na, na, na, na, na, na, na, na, na.
The Challenge 40, Battle of the East.
Yes, each week, cast members will be joining us to fill all of the tea on the relentless challenges, heartbreaking eliminations, and of course, all the juicy drama.
And let's not forget about the hookups.
Anyway, regardless of what era you're rooting for at home, everyone is welcome here on MTV's Official Challenge podcast.
So join us every week as we break down episodes of the Challenge 40, Battle of the Eras.
Listen to MTV's Official Challenge podcast on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
So, okay, Congress comes along.
Also, big shout out to Dave Ruse.
This is his first article that we're doing an episode on.
Yeah, Dave is one of the great writers from HowStuffWorks .com that we long admired over the years and tapped him to do some stuff for us.
Tapping him. We're tapping him and he's tapping back.
It's great. We've got a pretty great little stable going here.
We got Dave Ruse, Julia Layton, and The Grabster.
All writing for stuff you should know right now.
That's right. And I think if they keep up the good work, then that's all we need.
Sure, yeah, I think so too.
Cause we still put together our own stuff too.
Yes, we do. I wanna give us a pat on the back as well.
All right, that's fine.
All right, so - I just pulled a muscle in my arm.
Are you? I can't write this week.
So, like we said before the break, this has only happened four times in the instance 1977 that all 12 appropriations bills were passed by that October 1 deadline.
That's so funny. So, when it comes to October 2nd, it doesn't mean if we haven't passed those appropriations bills, it's like everything just stops working.
Right. Because if you pay attention to the news, you will notice that there's something called the continuing resolution.
So, this can happen for a lot of reasons.
One good and sort of non -offensive reason could be that man, we were really close and we're almost there.
We just need another week or the weekend.
We'll work through the weekend even to get this done.
Right. A good but offensive reason is because someone farted and everyone cleared out of the chamber and missed the deadline.
So, they had to do a continuing resolution.
Oh, no, I mean if they're close and they just need a few more days to work it out, then that can happen.
They'll pass a continuing resolution which means everything stays the same.
You don't get any more money or you don't get money, take it away.
Just operate as usual.
Right, you can't increase spending.
You can spend differently or whatever, but you can't spend above the levels of the previous fiscal year that you're currently in, right?
That's right. I'm with you, I think a continuing resolution, whether it's one for a day or for a year, and there have been ones that have been year long continuing resolutions.
Yeah, there's no limit.
You can pass them forever long you think you need.
Right. It does show that negotiations are still ongoing.
They haven't broken down.
They just haven't reached the point where they're in agreement yet.
That's right. The problem comes when they stop issuing continuing resolutions.
That's right. Dave Thu and a few pretty cool facts here.
186 continuing resolutions have been passed since 1977, and 117 of those, or those, have been since 1998.
Yes. So it's taken them 117 times that they could not work it out since 1998.
That's a lot. Yeah, it is, but if you think about it, it's about evenly split.
Well, no, it's not evenly split.
It's like 70 to, I think 69 to 117 over 220 year periods.
Oh yeah. And it does seem to be getting worse, but that's kind of lopsided because in 2001 there were 21 of that 117.
21 of them all came in 2001.
Yeah. So I'm not quite sure about this, but I wonder is the number and increase in continuing resolutions, is that like a barometer for government or how government's working?
I don't know. Because I wonder, because I mean, ideally, like they would get all this done by the October 1st deadline every time.
Well, it depends because as this points out, like sometimes it is over the weekend and it's just a few days, and they're like really close to having it worked out.
So to me, that's not the biggest deal in the world.
That doesn't mean the government isn't functioning well.
I mean, as well as it ever does.
Am I right? But like in 2007, 11, and 13, they were all year long.
There were no appropriations bills.
They just said we're just gonna repeat last year.
Or no real appropriations bills, I guess.
Right, they just said remember the spending levels from before, go with God, that's what you got again this year because we can't come to an agreement.
Yeah, that's when things are bad.
So continuing resolutions too, it doesn't affect spending levels or it doesn't increase them, it can't.
I wonder, I don't know if it can decrease them or not.
I know you just basically says same spending level as last year.
So maybe it can't decrease them either.
I think you can't decrease.
I think it's just your current funding is locked.
Right, but you can attach riders on to continuing resolutions.
Yeah, these policy riders, those can be like the make or break.
And if it's clean, which I don't know how often that happens, I'd be curious to see a stat.
But if it's a clean policy rider, that means it has nothing else or a clean.
CR. CR. It doesn't have any policy riders.
That's right. So a lot of times though if there's a policy rider on a CR, it might be like, okay, we can't come to an agreement about Medicaid funding abortion, that was a big one in the 1970s.
Yeah. And, but in this same appropriations bill that we're haggling over, there's this other thing that's like super critical.
It's like local hospitals aren't going to get any NICU funding and it's about to run out.
So we need to increase the NICU funding for local hospitals and we'll attach that as a policy rider to this continuing resolution because this is kind of an emergency and it doesn't really have anything to do with the contentious part that's keeping the policy or the appropriations bill from being passed.
So that's I think usually what happens with that.
You know what show really nails this stuff is Veep.
Oh my gosh. For all it's like, you know, comedy and funny stuff, it seems like they really nail kind of what it's like in Washington.
Sure. Because there's a lot of talk of this kind of stuff.
Yeah. Clean bills and riders and who's on whose side and can we sway this one person over to our side.
Yeah, a lot of just dirty, dirty language.
Oh yeah, man, Julia Louis Dreyfuss.
She is a, she's an international treasure.
I had one interaction with her briefly.
When? In LA in my friend's building in Los Feliz, the Hollywood building, he lived there, Scotty, he knows Scotty.
Sure, cool. And we had a case of beer and a pizza and some snacks and we were going.
She showed up and was like where's the party?
Well, that's sort of what happened.
We were going up in the front of the building and she was shooting New Adventures of Old Christine right there at the entrance.
And we literally walked by her and they were like putting on her makeup like right in front of, they were right about to go and she said, who are those guys?
I want to go with them.
Where are you guys going?
And of course we were like come on up.
That's cool. And then an electrician knocked on her door and asked to put a light in his apartment shining out the window.
How much did you charge him?
Nah, we didn't. We were just like come on in.
Oh, that's nice. And then Eric Estrada showed up and arrested you.
All right, so where are we here?
So I'll tell you where we left off Chuck.
We left off with continuing resolutions.
Temporary funding. Yeah, eventually if a position is contentious enough about some part of the budget.
And very rarely is it something financial necessarily.
Like it has to do with finances because it's in the budget but typically it's something more political than that.
Like the idea of Medicaid funding abortions.
In 1977 and 1978, impasses were reached where they could not come to an agreement on using Medicaid to fund abortions.
Federal dollars to fund abortions, right?
Very contentious issue.
Yes, it had to do with money.
It had to do with finances, Medicaid funding.
But really it was about the social issue, as cultural issue, abortion.
That's usually the kind of political impasse or divide that it takes to really reach a point where one side says, you know what?
I don't even agree to this continuing resolution anymore.
Just forget it, we're done.
Yeah, it seems like it's usually something that is so important to that either president or party or both that they feel like it's worth digging in.
And a lot of times that has to do, sometimes that has to do with the thing itself but sometimes it has to do with the perception of that thing to your voting base.
Sure, that's part of it too.
But I mean, we're talking politicians here.
I think you could have just said the last part.
That's true. So what happens when they fail to pass that appropriations bill and they're not talking, you're gonna get a funding gap.
And that doesn't necessarily lead to a shutdown either.
Can we please get to the shutdown?
Well, since 1981, more than half of the funding gaps lasted just a few days.
When I talked about solving it over the weekend, a lot of times that will happen over the weekend.
And if it's less than a few days, that means no one had to sit out work or whatever, it was furloughed.
Right, so technically the government was shut down but no one noticed because it happened on days when the federal government isn't open anyway.
Yeah and until 1981, they were actually allowed to keep operating but the Reagan administration changed all that.
Yeah, what was the name?
Benjamin Civeletti, Civeletti?
Technically in Italian it would be ch, because a C followed by a vowel makes a ch sound.
Did you know that? I do, and I don't remember this guy.
I don't either. I mean, we were young and probably too young to really know about attorney generals.
Young and reckless.
Like I knew the president and the vice president.
Sure. And maybe the speaker of the house or something.
First attorney general I was cognizant of was Edwin Meese.
Wasn't he or was he state?
I don't even know. He was the first cabinet member I was aware of, Edwin Meese.
Yeah, I know Edwin Meese.
Because I think they made fun of him in Mad Magazine.
It showed him getting hit by a mouse trap or something because he was a meese.
That's kind of how, I was just exposed to politics too.
Mad? I think so. Sure.
Yeah. I knew all about Spiro Agnew, even though I had no idea who he was.
I still don't really know who he was.
There's this great Simpsons quote where Milhouse and Bart are looking at a Mad Magazine.
They're like, they're making fun of that Spiro Agnew guy again.
He must work there or something.
And I remember thinking like, I guess Spiro Agnew works there.
Because they used to skewer like the publisher too.
So I just thought, Spiro Agnew is one of them.
I think it's a funny name too in comedy circles.
It's a good one. Yes, attorney general Benjamin Chibiletti.
He was Reagan's AG and he said it is not constitutional to keep spending money without congressional approval, which is what's happening when you say, we'll go ahead and keep working federal government.
So he, I mean, they kind of made shutdowns happen.
Yeah, like it was like, okay, we're shut down, ha ha.
We're still discontinuing on like normal until Chibiletti said, well, remember that anti -deficiency act?
That's actually for real.
And I saw somewhere that it like they actually enforced that and like federal agencies are frequently fined for violating these things, like going into contracts or hiring people when they don't really have the money for it.
And I saw somewhere the SEC got an $800 million fine once for it.
Couldn't find it anywhere else.
But it was a spectacular enough number to at least mention it.
So Chibiletti really changed the rules for shutdowns, because before, if the government shut down, but the government still functioned, it was almost more of like a, what's the word I'm looking for?
Ceremonial kind of thing.
I know what you mean.
Didn't really mean anything.
It was symbolic. Symbolic, yes.
Once Chibiletti said, no, no, no, we actually can't stay open during a shutdown.
That made the whole thing way more politically risky.
And so they stopped happening nearly as frequently from that point on.
That's right. Things have changed since then.
Tremendously. And there have been four times and sort of recently where people really dug in and there were what we would call major shutdowns.
The winner of 95 -96, there were two shutdowns because of Bill Clinton being a Democrat and Newt Gingrich hating his guts.
He was the House Speaker at the time in the Republican controlled Congress and Newt was all about the contract for America, which basically was small government, lowering taxes.
Really sticking it to the poor.
Yeah, like really higher restrictions on or more strict restrictions on welfare recipients.
Yeah. So he and Bill Clinton went at it for a long time.
They really did. And I mean, like each side was dug in and Gingrich was trying to shove that contract with America down Clinton's throat.
This is not what Clinton's policies were.
And Clinton said, no, and neither side would give.
And finally, and this is how shutdowns usually get resolved.
They start doing polls of the American public and say, who do you blame for this?
And almost invariably the public says Congress.
This is Congress's fault that the country is just being weakened right now by this government shutdown and then Congress relents.
And that's what happened for those two.
Both of the shutdowns were combined 26 days and Republicans in the Congress were to blame according to American people in polling numbers at least.
So, they said, sorry.
Fine, fine. We'll try to get you impeached instead.
Should we talk about 2013?
Yeah, I remember this one really clearly.
That's right. President Barack Obama, Republicans in Congress again, Ted Cruz.
Like almost single -handedly shut the government down if I remember it correctly.
Yeah, he passed a bill that the Republicans were very upset about the Affordable Care Act.
And he did all he could to defund that, basically defund what was later to be known as Obamacare.
And he was like leading a kind of a rogue faction of Tea Party Republicans, because John Boehner was the speaker at the time and he was a traditional conservative Republican.
And I believe he was on board to just, at least with continuing resolutions to keep the negotiations going.
And I remember Ted Cruz just being like, nope, I'm shutting the government down.
And it was a ballsy move, I'll tell you that.
That's right. And that lasted 16 days.
800 ,000 federal workers were furloughed, which we'll talk about what that means here in a minute.
But again, public polling and public outcry was against the Republicans at the time.
And they said, all right, we'll pass a CR and let's change some things about the Affordable Care Act, but we will pass a CR.
Right. They basically got some minor changes.
I think a big one with the biggest concession they got was that there would be income verification for people who were applying for Obamacare.
That's right. We should talk about the most recent shutdown as well.
2018, 19. I remember this one too, like it was yesterday.
Basically, it was yesterday.
And this was obviously when Donald Trump said, I want a border wall and I want $5 billion to get this thing going.
And Democrats said, no, you're not.
And they had a meeting on TV, which was really weird.
Oh, so weird. And Chuck Schumer tricked Donald Trump into taking responsibility for the shutdown.
Did Schumer do it? I thought he just like, out of nowhere, asserted it.
I thought I remembered Schumer sort of tricking him in the room into sort of claiming ownership, almost like a dare.
And Trump was sort of like, yeah, it's my shutdown.
Oh, really? Because this is important.
Yeah. And you can see Schumer kind of laughing like, oh, I don't think he even understands what he just said.
Yeah. I'm sure the Republicans were like, I can't believe he just said that.
That's right. And there was a partial shutdown on December 22 that ran for a historically long 35 days.
Yeah. The previous one in 2013 was 16 days.
The previous record was the 95 -96 ones, combined for 26 days.
Those were two. This was 35 days.
Over Christmas and New Year's, which was a tough time to do that.
Yeah. Because again, the deadline is October 1st.
So they had created continuing resolutions from October 1st or September 30th on to December 22nd.
And then finally, on December 22nd, I remember this.
Trump had been signaling that he was willing to give, and I guess at least keep negotiating continuing resolutions.
And Ann Coulter expressed on Trump's behalf that he would not be giving on this position and that the government shutdown would go on.
And Ann Coulter basically single -handedly forced his government shutdown.
Because she said, if you give on this, we're done.
I will vote against you at the polls and make sure everybody else does.
And that's when Trump's will was bolstered tremendously.
And that's when the government shutdown happened.
That's right. You want to take a break?
Yeah. How many people are still listening to this, do you think?
Roughly 70%. We'll be right back.
All right. All right.
How do you feel about biscuits?
Hi. I'm Akilah Hughes.
And I'm so excited about my new podcast, Rebel Spirit, where I head back to my hometown in Kentucky and try to convince my high school to change their racist mascot, the rebels, into something everyone in the South loves, the biscuits.
I was a lady rebel.
Like, what does that even mean?
The Boone County rebels will stay the Boone County rebels with the image.
It's right here in black and white in print.
A lion. An individual that came to the school saying that God sent him to talk to me about the mascot switch.
He's a leader. He chooses hills that he want to die on.
Why would we want to be the losing team?
I just take all of the other stuff out of it.
Segregation academies.
When civil rights said that we need to integrate public schools, these charter schools were exempt from this.
Bigger than a flag or mascot.
You have to be ready for serious backlash.
Listen to Rebel Spirit on the iHeartRadio app, Apple podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
Hi everyone, it's me, Katie Couric.
Have you heard about my newsletter called Body and Soul?
It has everything you need to know about your physical and mental health.
Personally, I'm overwhelmed by the wellness industry.
I mean, there's so much information out there about lifting weights, pelvic floors, cold plunges, anti -aging, so I launched Body and Soul to share doctor approved insights about all of that and more.
We're tackling everything.
Serums to use through menopause, exercises that improve your brain health, and how to naturally lower your blood pressure and cholesterol.
Oh, and if you're as sore as I am from pickleball, we'll help you with that too.
Most importantly, it's information you can trust.
Everything is vetted by experts at the top of their field, and you can write into them directly to have your questions answered.
So sign up for Body and Soul at katikuric .com slash bodyandsoul.
Taking better care of yourself is just a click away.
I'm Dr. Laurie Santos, host of the Happy This Lab podcast.
Is the US elections approach - It could feel like we're angrier and more divided than ever.
But in a new hopeful season of my podcast, I'll share with the science really shows that we're surprisingly more united than most people think.
We all know something is wrong in our culture, in our politics, and that we need to do better and that we can do better.
With the help of Stanford psychologist, Jamil Zaki.
It's really tragic if cynicism were a pill, it'd be a poison.
We'll see that our fellow humans, even those we disagree with, are more generous than we assume.
My assumption, my feeling, my hunch, is that a lot of us are actually looking for a way to disagree and still be in relationships with each other.
All that on the Happiness Lab.
Listen on the iHeartRadio app, Apple podcasts, or wherever you listen to podcasts.
MTV's Official Challenge podcast is back for another season.
That's right, the challenge is about to embark on its monumental 40th season, y 'all, and we are coming along for the ride.
Woo -hoo, that would be me, Devon Simone.
And then there's me, Da 'Von Rogers, and we're here to take you behind the scenes of, drum roll please, na -na -na -na -na -na -na -na -na.
The Challenge 40, Battle of the Eras.
Yes. Each week, cast members will be joining us to spill all of the tea on the relentless challenges, heartbreaking eliminations, and of course, all the juicy drama.
And let's not forget about the hookups.
Anyway, regardless of what era you're rooting for at home, everyone is welcome here on MTV's Official Challenge podcast.
So join us every week as we break down episodes of the Challenge 40, Battle of the Eras.
Listen to MTV's Official Challenge podcast on the iHeartRadio app, Apple podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
["Stop Me So More"] Okay, Chuck.
So. Well, we left a cliffhanger.
The government was shut down when we left.
Oh yeah, it came back.
It came back. After how long again?
35 days later, on January 25th, Trump called off that shutdown without that funding for the border wall, again, because public perception was swayed, not in his favor.
Right, which is rare.
Again, every single one of these shutdowns, everyone said it was Congress's fault.
With this one, they said it was the President's fault.
Surely that at least partially had to do with him claiming on TV that it was his responsibility for shutting down the government.
That didn't last long though, because I remember, and it gets so just childlike and snippy, but with the tweets from both sides, calling it the Trump shutdown, Trump calling it the Schumer Pelosi shutdown, trying to hashtag these things, see what's trending.
It's all just so ridiculous.
It is. Twitter. So the shutdown ended, and like you said, Trump didn't get that $5 billion for the wall.
I think they ultimately added like 1 .6 billion for border security, but nothing specifically for that wall.
Right, and the Democrats started saying, well, let's really define wall.
Right, yeah, I remember that.
But what people like to point out is not only did Trump not get that $5 billion, but America lost at least $11 billion during this shutdown.
Yeah, of income. Right, so there's a real economic cost to government shutdowns.
Basically, everyone, I don't care whether you're a Republican stuff you should know listener, a Democrat stuff you should know listener, an anarchist stuff you should know listener, a centrist stuff you should know listener, doesn't matter.
You should be really mad at your government whenever there's a shutdown.
That's right. Because it is holding people's jobs hostage.
Millions of people depend directly on the federal government for their paycheck.
And during a shutdown, you don't get a paycheck.
Some people even have to work.
But the people who don't have to work not only don't get a paycheck, they will never get that money for the work that they missed against their own will during that shutdown.
Yeah, like you can apply for back pay, is that right?
No. You can't? No. For who?
No one can? No, if you worked during the shutdown, you can get retroactive pay.
Congress has to approve it, but you had to have been working, it had to have been an essential job.
So you can't get back pay for furloughed time?
No. Okay. It's just gone forever.
So people who were out of work, who were federal workers, I think about 800 ,000 of them during the 2018 -19 shutdown, the Trump -Schumer -Pelosi shutdown, they went without pay for 35 days.
Yeah, 380 ,000 of the 800 ,000 federal workers actually had to stop working.
Right. That's almost every bit of NASA, HUD, housing urban development staff, 80 % of National Park Service, 50 ,000 workers at the IRS.
And then the other 420 ,000 that they deemed essential, they still worked, and I believe they're the ones that could apply, but they aren't guaranteed that money though, right?
No, again, Congress has to vote.
Right. And usually it's part of a shutdown, just to kind of like get public perception in Congress's favor.
Congress will hold a vote.
Right. And almost nearly, almost every time, nearly unanimously.
They'll pay the people.
Vote for retroactive pay when this thing's over.
The problem is, is again, those people who aren't working during that time, whose jobs are deemed non -essential, they'll never get that money.
Right. They just don't get it.
And I mean, if you project it to your future retirement, like that's money that you're not investing.
A, you're not buying things with it.
Right. So you're not helping the American economy.
Especially during the holidays is last time.
Yeah, you're not investing in the stock market.
You're not taking care of your retirement.
So it has these ripple effects that last months and years.
So just to get a little bit back to the nuts and bolts of all this, it's not like every time there's a government shutdown, the same agency, the same people are affected in exactly the same way.
Each shutdown's different because, do you remember how there's 12 different appropriations bills that have to go to the president?
Some of those can be passed and signed before the shutdown ever happened.
If that happens and your agency was in one of those appropriations bills, it's like every other Tuesday or Wednesday for you during the shutdown.
Right, but you can straddle those agencies and they can be split and that can get weird.
It can, well, like a good example of it getting weird is when this past one happened, the Coast Guard, which falls under the Homeland Security slice of the pie.
The Homeland Security hadn't been funded yet.
So the Coast Guard had to keep its operations going without pay while the rest of the military, the other four branches were just operating as normally because the defense appropriations bill had already been passed before the shutdown.
So depending on which bills have already been passed, some groups are working, some groups aren't.
And even in each agency where the funding hasn't been appropriated for this coming year, there will be some people who will be working and others who aren't, and it's up to each agency during a shutdown to say, this is how we're going to function during this.
This is the jobs that have to be carried out whether the government's open or not.
And these are the people who can be sent home without any hopes of ever getting paid.
Yeah, like you see, A, you see the thing coming.
So it's not like a big surprise, but B, you have this sort of plan already in place.
It's called, you submit it actually to the Office of Management and Budget, and you coordinate with them rather.
And that's where you gotta lay out your plan.
They know it's coming, and so they gotta plan accordingly.
And like I remember, I have friends that worked with the federal government, the CDC and places like that.
And they watched this stuff really closely.
Some of them were furloughed and went 35 days without a paycheck.
Right. And so there's that personal level where you missed rent that month.
I can't remember who was it, Wilbur Ross.
One of the cabinet members was like, go, you know, go take up a craft or a hobby and turn that into like money to pay your rent or just something, some unsolicited advice that no one wanted to hear right then.
It was not welcome, yeah.
So, get on Etsy. If you are in that position like, yes, you missed rent, you missed your car payment, you missed like all sorts of stuff.
Even if you're not a federal employee, you're still probably affected in one way or another.
And the longer that a shutdown goes on, the more and more people are affected.
Everybody from people who are trying to get their passport application pushed through to people who are supplemental nutrition program recipients, welfare recipients, food stamps, children's morning breakfast programs, like all these things start to run out of funding and they get affected and more
and more people start to be directly impacted by these shutdowns the longer they go on.
Sure, the FDA, food inspections can be curtailed.
And in fact, during long shutdowns, there are safety experts that say, you might wanna steer clear of fresh food right now.
Yeah, don't eat like that bag of romaine lettuce, especially if you're pregnant or something.
Or let me see, the National Park Service, this was a big one during the last shutdown.
I think some parks were closed altogether.
That's how they did it in 2013.
Yeah, that was a big one.
They lost 76 million bucks a day and lost revenue for the National Park Service.
But this most recent one, some of them were shut down, some of them were kept open, but not staffed.
So very famously there was, I think it was that Joshua Tree, where they damaged, irreparable damage to some of the Joshua Trees.
Somebody cut down at least one Joshua Tree, which takes centuries to grow, so that they could drive their off -road vehicle in an area where you're not supposed to drive an off -road vehicle, so they could get to it.
They cut down a Joshua Tree.
And that became kinda symbolic for that last shutdown.
I mean, there's a range of problems that range from inconveniences to not getting paid.
But imagine coming from another country and planning this thing for a year, you've put all this money into a trip to come see the greatest places in the United States.
Sure. I'm from wherever.
I'm German. Germany?
I was gonna say Germany.
And I wanna go see the most beautiful things in America.
I wanna go to the Grand Canyon in Yellowstone.
And I've had this trip paid for and planned and it's not refundable.
Right, what do you mean Mount Rushmore's closed?
I can see it right there.
It's closed. Sorry, Franz.
Sorry. Go see, I don't know.
What else is around there?
Not much. No, there's nothing.
That's kinda the point.
You go see Van Nostrand's childhood birthplace.
And again, these are seemingly like, if you ask the federal government, they're like, who cares about that minor inconvenience.
Well, there is one thing that I came across that I found particularly scummy, Chuck.
During government shutdowns when other people who are working are not getting paychecks.
Oh yeah, here we go.
Some congress people still get theirs.
All congress people do, but some have the wherewithal to be like, I'm not taking any pay during this shutdown.
Like maybe I'll get it retroactively, that's fine, but you just hang on to my paycheck.
Other congress people are like, yeah, keep the money coming.
I need it. Which is, that's super scummy to me.
Other people are out of work or working and not getting paid.
Like the TSA famously had to work and whether they wanted to or not, and they didn't get paid.
Or they're calling in sick.
They should, yeah. They should not be, congress should not be getting a paycheck during that time.
Because it's congress' fault.
I know. I think they said that TSA employees, about 10 % at one point were calling in sick every day.
Yeah. After a little while.
You remember that? Yeah.
It was not a good time to travel.
And that's an inconvenience.
People flying, taking longer.
When's the next one coming, Chuck?
That's what everyone wants to know.
October 2nd. Okay. We'll keep Veneer up for it.
In the meantime, now you know everything there is to know about government shutdowns.
There's more little interesting details, but if you want to know about them, you can be a saucy boy or girl and look it up on the internet.
And since I said saucy, it's time for listener mail.
We have a couple of corrections.
We haven't done these in a while.
We haven't made mistakes in years.
That's right. These were both yours, not to pile on.
Hey guys, I want to point out that Donald Trump spoke to the prime minister of Sweden, Stefan Leuven, about the arrest of Aesop Rocky, not the king.
Yeah, everybody was really making a lot of noise about that over here, because I got it wrong.
And he said, I would not have even sent this email if Josh hadn't have finished that story with, this is reality.
What I just said is actual facts.
That was close enough.
Yeah. It was just a slip of the tongue.
Facts are the lower case F.
And that is from Humpus Bufgerg.
Well, let's try that again.
Humpus Bufgerg. Let me see.
There's a lot of consonants in there.
I'm sure some of those are quite silent.
Wow, I think you nailed it.
But you forgot the grip.
Is that his last name?
I think Bob Jurg is the middle name of Humpus.
So Humpus grip. And I love that he put Swede in parentheses as if I had to see that.
And then the other one was a math thing.
And I'm kind of curious about this one.
Nuclear semiotics, Josh said 9 ,000 seconds is 446 days.
He said it's 104 days.
And he said, I don't know, you guys are busy in recording and performing calculations.
He said, but I'm really curious just where that number came from.
He said, because no combination of multiplying dividing 9 million by 60 or 24 yield 466.
And I'm really just curious.
You guys do a great job.
Thanks for everything.
Joey Russo. Thanks, Joey.
I think that that number was where my fat thumb and Siri got together and had a baby.
That's where I think that 446 came from.
Gotcha. And I'm sure right after you said that, I went, uh -huh, that's right.
So I'm equally to blame.
Thank you, Chuck, for taking that for the team.
Sure. Team Josh. If you want to get in touch with us to let us know what kind of mistakes I've been making left and right and Chuck's been abiding, we love that stuff.
Love it. Can't get enough of it.
So get in touch with us.
You can go on to stuffyoushouldknow .com and check out our social links.
And as always, you can send us an email to stuffpodcastatihartradio .com.
Stuff You Should Know is a production of iHeartRadio.
For more podcasts from iHeartRadio, visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.
["I Heart Radio"] Hi, I am Lacey Lamar.
And I'm also Lacey Lamar.
Just kidding, I'm Amber Ruffin.
Okay, everybody, we have exciting news to share.
We're back with season two of the Amber and Lacey Lacey and Amber Show on Will Ferrell's Big Money Players Network.
This season, we make new friends, deep dive into my steamy DMs, answer your listener questions, and more.
The more is punch each other.
Listen to the Amber and Lacey Lacey and Amber Show on Will Ferrell's Big Money Players Network on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
Just listen, okay? Or Lacey gets to do it.
Hi, I'm David Eagleman from the podcast Inner Cosmos, which recently hit the number one science podcast in America.
I'm a neuroscientist at Stanford, and I've spent my career exploring the three pound universe in our heads.
Join me weekly to explore the relationship between your brain and your life.
Because the more we know about what's running under the hood, the better we can steer our lives.
Listen to Inner Cosmos with David Eagleman on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
MTV's official challenge podcast is back for another season.
That's right, the challenge is about to embark on its monumental 40th season, y 'all, and we are coming along for the ride.
Woo hoo, that would be me, Devin Simone.
And then there's me, Davon Rogers, and we're here to take you behind the scenes of The Challenge 40, Battle of the Eras.
Join us as we break down each episode, interview challengers, and take you behind the scenes of this iconic season.
Listen to MTV's official challenge podcast on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
