In the fast-paced world of project management and personal goal setting, the most common tendency is to dive headfirst into execution. However, the latest episode of the Before Breakfast podcast, hosted by Laura Vanderkam, suggests a counterintuitive approach: before starting any project, you must first think about how it will end. Drawing inspiration from Robert Sutton and Huggy Rao’s book, The Friction Project: How smart leaders make the right things easier and the wrong things harder, this practice serves as a vital form of "good friction"—a deliberate pause that ultimately enhances decision-making and productivity.
Sutton and Rao argue that organizational friction is often viewed negatively, but when applied strategically, it allows teams to slow down and evaluate their trajectories. The core methodology involves two distinct mental exercises: the "pre-victorum" and the "pre-mortem."
While most people are familiar with a "post-mortem"—a retrospective analysis conducted after a project concludes—Sutton and Rao suggest "time traveling" to the finish line before the work even begins. By envisioning the project’s future success, team members can articulate the specific events, behaviors, and strategies that led to that positive outcome. This forward-looking narrative allows teams to build these "key factors" directly into their initial project plans, increasing the likelihood of achieving their goals.
Conversely, the pre-mortem requires teams to imagine the project as a "total failure." By asking, "What happened that led to the failure?", participants can identify potential pitfalls and systemic weaknesses in advance. This proactive identification allows for the creation of guardrails, enabling the team to "avoid the bad stuff" while simultaneously "embracing the good." By visualizing these two scenarios, the team is better positioned to navigate the complexities of execution with a clearer roadmap.
The importance of considering endings extends beyond professional projects; it is a fundamental aspect of life management. Vanderkam references her conversation with Emily P. Freeman, author of How to Walk into a Room, to highlight that "pretty much everything in our lives will end at some point." Rather than ignoring this reality, we would be "wise to think about that."
Endings, whether good, bad, or neutral, are often subject to our own influence. By contemplating the conclusion of a transition—such as Vanderkam’s example of her child’s upcoming college application process—we can define what success looks like on our own terms. For Vanderkam, success in that context is defined by her son being "happy with the outcome" and feeling "supported during the whole thing."
The takeaway from this episode is clear: we have the power to shape the narratives of our lives and our work by intentionally designing the end from the beginning. By asking ourselves, "What are you starting? How will it end?", we move from a reactive state to a proactive one. Engaging in this level of foresight does not just prevent failure; it optimizes the journey, ensuring that when we reach the end, we have successfully navigated the hurdles to arrive exactly where we intended to be. As Vanderkam concludes, this intentionality is the key to "making the most of our time."