Abercrombie denim is everything right now.
Denim should feel like this.
Confident, easy, like your butt has never looked better.
If you didn't know, Abercrombie's Curve Love denim went viral in 2019 for eliminating waist gap, and it's still a game changer.
Between that and their classic fits with a straighter line from waist to hip, the perfect denim does exist. Shop Abercrombie denim in the app, online, and in -store.
Happy Monday, listeners, and happy August. For Scientific American Science Quickly, I'm Rachel Feldman.
Music Let's kick off the month with a quick roundup of some of the latest news in science.
First, we have Andrea Thompson, Senior News Editor for Sustainability at Scientific American, to tell us about last week's earthquake and the resulting tsunami waves.
Last Tuesday, a magnitude 8 .8 earthquake struck off the coast of Russia's Konchakha Peninsula in a subduction zone where the Pacific plate is plunging below part of the North American plate.
And subduction zones are typically where you'd see tsunamis be generated because you have a big shift in the Earth that sort of provides a big push to the water.
And this area actually did produce a really big tsunami back in 1952 when there was a magnitude 9 .0 earthquake.
So sort of tsunami alerts, warnings, advisories were released kind of all around the Pacific.
So there were some in Japan, some in Russia, Hawaii, all along sort of the North American coastline, coastline, you're from the Aleutians down to Southern California, also in South America.
And some of this is because we generate warnings if there is the likelihood of tsunami waves arriving and there is the possibility of them causing damage because you want to give people as much time as possible to move away from the coast or reach higher ground.
And then, and the hours after an earthquake, we sort of get more information that helps refine, find, okay, how much energy was released?
How is that likely to track sort of around the basin?
And that's why you'll see changes going from maybe a warning to an advisory or something different.
Luckily, the waves were not catastrophic, but there were eight -foot waves in parts of California.
There were definitely waves in Japan and Hawaii.
Luckily, in a lot of these places, they didn't cause considerable damage, but there was structural damage.
And And these kind of waves, they're not of the scale of the 2011 Tohoku earthquake or the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami, but they're still strong enough to sweep a person off their feet or to wipe away a structure.
So, you know, a magnitude 8 .8 earthquake is a really big earthquake that is up there among the strongest ever on record. In 1952, when there was a magnitude 9 .0 earthquake that caused damage as far away as Hawaii.
Hawaii. This one, it turns out, did not produce as big a tsunami as that, although 8 .8 sounds really close to 9.
But the scale of measuring earthquakes is not linear.
So there is a big jump in the amount of energy released when you go from 8 .8 to 9 .0, which is probably part of the reason this earthquake didn't produce as big of a tsunami.
So I think one of the things to take take away from this is that our warning systems work really well.
You know, in 1952, a lot of people were killed and there was damage because no one knew what was happening.
And we've built up these really robust tsunami warning arrays and sensors.
And through the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, we have monitoring for tsunamis and issuing warnings.
And it's clear that it works.
People were alerted, they were able to stay away from coasts, and we didn't see, the casualties that we could have if there wasn't a warning, and that is also because we've put a lot of public funding into the science behind this and to keeping this running.
Thanks for that update, Andrea.
Next, some troubling news from the Environmental Protection Agency.
Last Tuesday, the EPA began making moves to repeal the so -called endangerment finding.
This 2009 declaration concluded that several greenhouse gases pose a danger to public health and welfare, which meant they could be regulated as pollutants under the Clean Air Act, the endangerment finding followed the analysis of decades of research and the review of more than 380 ,000 public comments.
Last week, the Department of Energy put out a report rebutting the endangerment finding.
The agency said the report offers a, quote, critical assessment of the conventional narrative on climate change.
And indeed, the report appears to undermine the scientific consensus on climate change across the board. The report argues that CO2 -induced warming appears to be less damaging economically than commonly believed, and that U .S. policy actions to curb climate change will have undetectably small impacts while potentially causing economic harm.
EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin, who announced the agency's proposal to rescind the endangerment finding at an auto dealership in Indiana, claimed the move could save an estimated $54 billion annually.
But experts are pushing back.
Rachel Cletus, a policy analyst and economist at the advocacy group Union of Concerned Scientists, told the Washington Post that the EPA's proposal contained fringe arguments that, quote, go against the established science.
And Scott Seleska, a professor of ecology and evolutionary biology at the University of Arizona, told the Associated Press that, quote, to repeal the endangerment finding now would be like a driver who is speeding towards a cliff taking his foot off the brake and instead pressing the accelerator.
The proposal won't be finalized immediately.
There's first going to be a public comment period.
So we'll keep you posted on the details of that.
Now let's move on to some news you can use.
A study published last Tuesday in the American Journal of Preventative Medicine suggests that picking up your walking pace for just 15 minutes a day could help you live longer.
The new research uses data from the Southern Community Cohort Study, which enrolled about 85 ,000 people between the ages of 40 and 79 from 2002 to 2009.
Researchers included data from 79 ,856 of the study participants, the majority of whom were from low -income populations.
populations. Study subjects had reported the average amount of time they spent walking each day and offered estimates for how much of that time they spent walking slowly walking around at work, walking a dog, or lightly exercising, for example, versus walking fast, such as climbing stairs, exercising, or walking briskly.
The researchers then cross -referenced their study subject list with the National Death Index to track the participants' mortality through the end of 2022.
The team found that walking quickly for just 15 minutes each day was associated with an almost 20 % decrease in mortality.
In contrast, three hours of walking slowly each day was associated with a 4 % reduction.
Of course, any amount or type of movement is good for you, so don't be discouraged if you're not power walking on a daily basis.
this. But if you're looking for a cheap, dare I say it even free, and relatively accessible way to improve your cardiovascular health, consider sneaking a quick walk in, maybe while listening to science quickly?
I mean, it's right there in the name.
We'll end this episode with a fun story about potatoes.
And also tomatoes. Speaking personally, even though I know both of those edibles are technically nightshades, I don't otherwise lump them together in my brain, Unless I'm eating French fries and ketchup, obviously.
But a study published last Thursday in the journal Cell suggests that actually potatoes and tomatoes go way back.
Scientists already knew that potatoes were closely related to a group of plants native to Chile.
But while they're genetically quite similar, those tater relatives don't actually produce tubers, which is, you know, kind of what makes a potato a potato.
According to a new analysis of genomes from 450 cultivated potatoes and 56 wild potato species, modern spuds may exist because of an ancient hybridization event between those tuberless plants, which are called Etuberism, and the tomato.
Etuberism and tomatoes diverged from a common ancestor a whole 14 million years ago, according to the researchers, which isn't surprising if you've eaten both tomatoes and potatoes or even just looked at them.
They're They're very different.
But the new study suggests that they interbred some 5 million years after the big split.
The researchers say potatoes got their SP6A gene, which is apparently what signals them to produce tubers, from their tomato roots, so to speak.
While their IT1 gene, which is involved in controlling the growth of underground stems, comes from the etuberism side.
Both of those parents were crucial for producing the starchy lumps we know and love today.
day. That's all for this week's Science News Roundup.
We'll be back on Wednesday to talk about why NASA's future could be in peril.
Science Quickly is produced by me, Rachel Feltman, along with Fondam Wongi, Kelso Harper, and Jeff DelVecchio.
This episode was edited by Alex Zaghiara.
Shaina Poses and Aaron Shattuck fact -check our show.
Our theme music was composed by Dominic Smith.
Subscribe to Scientific American for more up -to -date and in -depth science news.
news. For Scientific American, this is Rachel Feltman.
Have a great week!
