This BBC podcast is supported by the UK.
The U.S. electric grid is approaching a breaking point.
As demand soars from data centers and home energy use, our aging infrastructure can't keep up.
And the Department of Energy warns that without action, blackouts could surge 100-fold by 2030.
The good news?
One solution is already here.
Propane.
It's American-made, stored on site, and always ready.
Powering homes and businesses with cleaner, reliable energy that doesn't depend on the grid or the weather.
Learn more at propane.com.
Saks Off 5th is your secret to fashion's most wanted deals at up to 70% off.
On the hunt for designer steals that'll turn heads and leave a trail of envy?
Uncover Gucci, Valentino, Versace, Stuart Weitzman, and more.
With new arrivals dropping weekly at prices too good to stay confidential.
Luxe layers, statement boots and tailored essentials from Saks Off 5th will put your wardrobe on the most wanted list.
Head to saksoff5th.com or a Saks Off 5th store near you for a style lineup you won't want to miss.
This is the Global News Podcast from the BBC World Service.
I'm Ankur Desai and at 5 hours GMT on Saturday the 18th of October, these are our main stories.
King Charles' brother Andrew, relinquishes his royal titles after new allegations emerge over his links to Jeffrey Epstein.
Volodymyr Zelensky fails to secure Tomahawk missiles after a meeting with Donald Trump.
And a landmark deal to cut global shipping carbon emissions collapses under US and Saudi pressure.
Also in this podcast, how good is your favourite athlete's poker face?
When they perform extraordinarily well, what you see there is a sort of slightly more relaxed face.
If they're performing not so well.
You see a little more facial behaviour, a little more muscle movements.
We begin here in Britain.
King Charles's brother Andrew has announced he's relinquishing his royal titles, except for Prince.
His fall from grace was triggered by his friendship with the late American businessman Jeffrey Epstein, who was jailed for sex crimes against underage girls.
Andrew stepped back from public life in the wake of this disastrous BBC interview back in 2019.
Do I regret the fact that he has quite obviously conducted himself in a manner unbecoming?
Yes.
Unbecoming.
He was a sex offender.
Yeah, I'm sorry, I'm being polite, in the sense that he was a sex offender.
The problem was that once he had been convicted... You stayed with him.
I stayed with him.
That's the bit that, as it were, I kick myself for on a daily basis, because it was not something that was becoming of a member of the royal family.
And we try and uphold the highest standards and practices, and I let the side down.
Simple as that.
Just over two years later, with the Epstein story not going away, the late Queen Elizabeth stripped her second son of his honorary military affiliations and royal charitable patronages.
This month, emails were revealed which contradicted claims made by him in his BBC interview about when exactly Andrew ended his relationship with Epstein.
And next week we'll see the posthumous publication of a book by Virginia Dufresne, who took her life earlier this year.
She claimed she was trafficked by Epstein and was forced to have sex with Andrew at the age of 17.
We should point out that Prince Andrew denies all allegations against him.
Virginia Dufresne's brother, Sky Roberts, gave the BBC his reaction to the news that Andrew is losing his titles.
In a lot of ways, this vindicates Virginia.
She was a truth teller from the beginning, and she was telling the truth.
And I think this is a moment where we feel very proud for her, but we're also sad because she should be sitting here.
She should be talking to you, but she's not.
And so we're here to advocate for her and her survivor sisters.
I think her kids would be incredibly proud to know that...
Their mom is an American hero.
She's an international hero.
All the years of work that she put in is now coming to some sort of justice.
And these monsters can't escape from it.
The truth will find its way out.
So has the prince taken this step willingly?
My colleague Valerie Sanderson asked our UK correspondent Rob Watson.
In his statement, he says he did it in discussion with King Charles and the wider family.
But I don't think there's any doubt and I think the palace has pretty much hinted at this that had Prince Andrew not fallen on his sword, that King Charles and his heir, Prince William, would probably have pushed him onto it.
And Prince William decided that in the end, the reputation and survival of the monarchy trumps all else.
Family loyalty, brotherly love, such as that exists.
And that's why this move was taken.
He's been surrounded, Prince Andrew, by scandal for years.
What do you think the tipping point was?
I think there have been two tipping points in the last few days.
The first one, of course, goes back to Jeffrey Epstein and his relationship and friendship with the disgraced financier And the publication the posthumous publication of a book by Virginia Jeffrey, who was trafficked by Jeffrey Epstein.
Now in her book she says that she thought that Andrew was and I'm pretty much quoting here entitled and I'm quoting now believed.
Having sex with me was his birthright.
That is obviously hugely damaging.
But secondly, his name had also been linked with a senior Chinese Communist Party official whose name has been mixed up in a rather prominent case in the last few weeks about espionage against targets in the UK.
So I think it was the combination of those two things I think probably led to the king and those around the king saying to Prince Andrew look, the game is up.
You've got to go for the sake of the monarchy.
Now, he's giving up the Duke of York title and other honours, but he remains a prince, doesn't he?
Because he's the son of a monarch, the late Queen Elizabeth, and he'd already stepped back from royal duties.
So what does this mean practically for him going forward, do you think?
I think practically not very much.
I mean, as you say, the disgrace, the demotion, the humiliation began with his mother reluctantly the late Queen Elizabeth II, stripping him of his military titles, of him being able to call himself His Royal Highness in 2022 and essentially stepping back from all royal duties.
So practically not much.
But I guess the way you would put it is that this completes, if you like, his humiliation, his demotion and banishment from public life.
I mean any idea that Prince Andrew is ever going to return in some way to the front row of the royal family.
That is now finished, and he will be more isolated than ever.
Rob Watson reporting.
Donald Trump and Vladimir Zelensky have come a long way from that explosive White House meeting earlier this year, when the US president called his counterpart disrespectful.
You don't have the cards right now.
With us, you start having cards.
I'm not playing cards.
Right now, you're playing cards.
I'm very serious, Mr. President.
You're gambling with the lives of millions of people.
You're gambling with World War III.
Your country's in big trouble.
Well, on Friday the leaders were on friendlier terms as they met again in Washington to discuss Russia's war in Ukraine.
They spoke about the potential for a ceasefire, security guarantees and lost territory.
But the question of providing long-range US Tomahawk missiles was the one on everyone's mind, including President Trump's.
Speaking ahead of the meeting, he remained noncommittal.
So we're going to be talking about Tomahawks and would much rather have them not need Tomahawks, would much rather have the war be over.
The war in the Middle East was far more complicated.
We got that one done, and I think we have a good chance.
I think President Zelensky wants it done, and I think President Putin want it done.
Now all they have to do is get along a little bit.
President Zelensky spoke to journalists after he appeared to come away from the meeting empty-handed.
We had a productive meeting, a long meeting.
We spoke about air defence.
It's important for us.
You know, even now, when we speak with you, there's a lot of drones in Ukraine.
We spoke about long range, of course, and I want not to make statements about it.
We decided that we don't speak about it because the United States doesn't want escalation.
Our reporter Ben DeBoosman Jr. was at the White House and gave us this assessment of the meeting.
Well, it was a very optimistic mood inside the room during the meeting between Zelensky and Trump in the Cabinet Room of the White House.
But it ended without any sort of firm commitment from either side or any sort of agreement or indication of the way forward.
For the last several days President Trump had kind of teased that he was mulling over providing Tomahawk missiles to Ukraine which could alter the war in that direction.
It would allow Ukraine to strike targets very, very deep into Russia.
But today, he sounded far less committed to that idea.
He said that the U.S. has many Tomahawks, but that it needs them.
At one point I also asked President Trump whether he thinks that the prospect of Tomahawks being introduced to the conflict would is what brought President Putin to the table.
And he said he frankly doesn't know.
So it was a cordial meeting, certainly compared to the very infamous Oval Office meeting several months ago.
But it did seem to have ended without any sort of firm indication of the way forward, for one.
A lot of talk about the Tomahawk missiles.
Would they be a huge game changer?
And what sort of a strategic advantage would it give Ukraine, which you touched upon just there?
They could certainly be very much a strategic advantage for Ukraine.
Tomahawk missiles have ranges of over 1000 miles, which would allow Ukraine to strike strategic targets very deep inside Russia, certainly in all of the European portion of Russia including, for example, drone factories or airfields used to launch aircraft that launch munitions at Ukraine.
So it's certainly something that Ukraine would very much like.
But, as President Trump noted in the meeting, they're also something that the US uses very frequently.
In recent months alone, Tomahawk missiles were used as kind of the follow-on strike after the airstrikes on Iranian nuclear facilities.
They were previously used against Houthi targets in Yemen earlier on in this administration.
So President Trump's concern is that Giving these weapons to Ukraine would mean that the US is less prepared to use them themselves in the future.
If we look ahead to this potential meeting between President Trump and President Putin, what would the mood be like going into that one now, especially after President Putin would have seen today's events?
Well, it's very difficult to say.
During the meeting today at the White House, President Trump certainly seemed optimistic that Putin does in fact want to come back to the negotiating table.
But what is unclear to many in Washington is why that is.
You know he likes to keep his cards close, taking kind of a carrot and stick approach.
You know, in that he and Secretary of Defense Pete Hexeth this week kind of said that there would be costs for Russia not coming to the table.
What those costs exactly are is still unclear, but there's certainly momentum behind, for example, secondary sanctions.
That's something that was discussed among Republican lawmakers here in Washington this week.
But President Trump's not really giving anything away about what makes him so optimistic that these talks in Budapest will accomplish what previous talks in Alaska and over the phone haven't.
Bernd De Boesemann Jr. in Washington.
It's been 10 years in the making and was supposed to be a world first, but a landmark deal to cut global shipping emissions has collapsed under pressure from the US and Saudi Arabia.
More than 100 member states of the UN's shipping body had gathered in London to approve a treaty, but it fell at the final hurdle, as Esme Stellard reports.
This week's meeting of the International Maritime Organization in London was meant to be a victory lap for the global deal to cut shipping emissions.
Countries were set to approve the agreement which, from 2028, would have required ship owners to use a certain amount of green fuels in their vessels or face fines.
But the US ratcheted up the pressure over the course of the week, particularly on island states, to reject approval because of concerns the deal would increase the cost of goods for US consumers.
On the final day when countries should have been voting to approve it, Saudi Arabia tabled a motion to delay the talks for a year.
It was won by a handful of votes.
With discussions on hold, the deal is highly unlikely to meet its 2028 deadline and delegates have said it could push back action for years.
Speaking after the meeting, Stuart Neill, director of strategy at the industry body, the International Chamber of Shipping, said companies needed clarity.
So we are disappointed that governments haven't been able to come to an agreement here, because industry needs clarity so it can invest.
The issue really is it doesn't send a market signal to those fuel producers to start producing the new fuels that we're going to need.
That's outside of the shipping industry's responsibility.
We are a global industry, we travel the world and we need a global regulator.
But US Secretary of State Marco Rubio took to social media to declare this a huge win for President Trump.
Well, the US delegation's approach at this conference has highlighted President Trump's continued opposition to the carbon-cutting agenda.
Here's our climate editor, Justin Rowlatt.
Donald Trump has just brokered peace in the Middle East and is trying to do the same for Ukraine.
Yet the US president still found time to post about an obscure UN shipping body.
Why?
It shows his determination to take his war on climate action global.
After dismantling the US's domestic climate policies, he is targeting international ones.
On Truth Social...
He declared the US will not stand for this global green news scam tax on shipping and will not adhere in any shape or form.
This isn't gentle diplomacy.
He is wielding hard power.
His administration threatened tariffs, visa bans and blocking access to US ports for ships from tiny island states in the Pacific and Caribbean, as well as any others who supported the deal.
Mr Trump says he's educating countries on the dangers of relying on renewables, especially wind turbines, or windmills as he likes to call them.
Meanwhile, his team is urging nations to weaken climate pledges and burn more ideally American oil and gas.
Diplomats are asking what it says about how the US will approach COP30, the latest UN climate summit, which is being held in Brazil next month.
Next tennis players about to serve.
Footballers taking penalties, golfers ready to tee off with a drive.
Can we predict how athletes will perform just by studying their faces before an important moment in the game?
New research suggests there is a link between performance and poker face.
Philip Furley is a senior lecturer at the German Sports University and an expert on sports behaviour.
He's just published a study on the facial tics and movements of top darts players just before they throw a dart.
We do find a correlation within players that when they perform extraordinarily well, you see that in the face.
And what you see?
There is a sort of slightly more relaxed face, more of a poker face, less facial muscle movements before they perform extraordinarily well.
If they're performing not so well.
You see a little more facial behavior, a little more muscle movements, in particularly around the eyes and around the mouth region.
This sort of coincides with suboptimal performances.
Yes, it gives away what's going on in their head, in other words.
That's what I would say, yes.
Does it extend... beyond darts, do you believe?
So we've also looked at that in the context of penalty kicks in football, for example.
There does seem to be something there that the body sort of tells that do give away some levels of performance tendencies.
You mentioned football.
Zinedine Zidane, famous French footballer, was famously sick on the pitch, wasn't he?
Before he took a penalty against England, but he still scored.
So, I mean, it's obviously not foolproof and you wouldn't claim that it is.
No, no, certainly not.
Exactly in an extraordinary place like Zidane.
I mean, they can show they aren't in the optimal state to perform well.
But I mean, he still got it together, scored that penalty kick.
And where does your own research work go from here?
We've talked darts, we've talked football.
I'm wondering about sports like tennis, golf, for example.
Do you look elsewhere now to try and sort of underline everything that you've examined so far?
At the moment we are looking very much into sort of a big question in psychology that the people all around the world sort of have similar emotional expressions in sporting contexts.
In particular, we're looking at how they react when they win big Olympic matches or lose big Olympic matches.
This is something that we are researching intensively at the moment.
How has all this work informed what you do when you play sport?
Yeah, well, I'm getting older, so it's not that... I think we all are, yes.
So I don't play professionally anymore, but I never did really professionally.
But I was a decent handball player.
And when you played handball, did you have a poker face?
I think my face is actually quite revealing.
I wouldn't say I've got a poker face.
Maybe that's the reason why I got so interested in it.
Maybe there's room for improvement there.
Still to come.
It's very ethereal and you can almost see the water flowing, the movement of it, the movement of the fabric, the contrast of the light and the dark.
It's beautiful.
It's breathtaking.
Fans of Taylor Swift flock to a German museum to see the pop star's latest muse.
Have you ever wiped with a piece of dry single-ply toilet paper and wondered is this as good as it gets?
Well, it's not.
It gets a lot better thanks to the wet, extra-large cleaning power of Dude Wipes.
They comfortably clean up whatever TP leaves behind on your behind.
It's time to stop being an a-hole to your b-hole and start experiencing the confident clean of Dude Wipes.
Available at Amazon and at major retailers nationwide.
Dude Wipes.
Best clean, pants down.
The U.S. electric grid is approaching a breaking point.
As demand soars from data centers and home energy use, our aging infrastructure can't keep up.
And the Department of Energy warns that without action, blackouts could surge 100-fold by 2030.
The good news?
One solution is already here.
Propane.
It's American-made, stored on site, and always ready.
Powering homes and businesses with cleaner, reliable energy that doesn't depend on the grid or the weather.
Learn more at propane.com.
I'll see you next time.
All five of her best-selling products, including the amazing youth activating melon serum.
This next generation serum has the power of melon leaf stem cell technology.
It's melon leaf stem cells encapsulated for freshness and released onto the skin to support a visible reduction in the appearance of wrinkles.
With thousands of glowing, five-star reviews, why not give it a try?
Subscribe today and you can get the amazing Meaningful Beauty system for just $49.95.
That includes our introductory five-piece system free gifts, free shipping and a 60-day money-back guarantee.
All that available at MeaningfulBeauty.com.
You don't just live in your home, you live in your neighborhood as well.
So when you're shopping for a home, you want to know as much about the area around it as possible.
Luckily, homes.com has got you covered.
Each listing features a comprehensive neighborhood guide from local experts.
Everything you'd ever want to know about a neighborhood, including the number of homes for sale transportation, local amenities, cultural attractions, unique qualities and even things like median lot size and a noise score.
Homes.com.
We've done your homework.
A US court has found France's biggest bank, BNP Paribas, liable for widespread atrocities committed in Sudan under the former regime of Omar al-Bashir.
The trial, which began last month, heard harrowing testimony from three Sudanese plaintiffs on a litany of human rights abuses carried out by Sudanese soldiers and the Janjaweed militia in western Darfur.
On Friday, the jury in New York awarded nearly 21 million to the three victims who testified in court.
The French bank did business in Sudan from the late 1990s until 2009.
Our reporter Mickey Bristow has been following the story.
This court case relates to a period of time at the beginning of the century first decade really when there was atrocities carried out in Sudan by the Sudanese government under Omar al-Bashir.
Essentially, he sent in Sudanese soldiers and a militia known as the Janjaweed into Darfur.
It's thought they attacked civilians and perhaps 300,000 civilians were killed there.
Two and a half million were displaced.
And it's one of this century's most atrocious acts by a government.
In fact, the International Criminal Court has laid several charges against Omar al-Bashir for crimes against humanity and genocide.
Now, this case in New York was brought by Facebook. three people who were involved in those atrocities.
They retold terrible things which happened to them, being subjected to knife attacks burned with cigarettes.
One of the plaintiffs, a woman, was sexually assaulted, and they claimed essentially in court that BNP Paribas, this French bank, was partially responsible for what went on in Darfur, because it had helped France fund or facilitate the Sudanese government's trading with the rest of the world and so essentially brought it money which he was then able to use to fund these atrocities.
And just tell us why this is so key as well in terms of opening up to a wider class action case.
Yeah, there are apparently at the moment around 20000 US citizens now US citizens, but originally people from Sudan.
So they're waiting in the wings, really, to see how this case has transpired.
Now the bank all along said that they acknowledged that they'd done business with the Sudanese government under Omar al-Bashir.
But what they said was essentially that these atrocities would have happened anyway without them happening.
The Sudanese government would have traded its commodities, oil and cotton, without their help.
And so they weren't really responsible.
That was their argument.
But the jury rejected that and awarded compensation.
And it's not the first time the bank has been in a US court.
It isn't.
Ten years ago, it settled a case with the Department of Justice in the United States, who accused the bank essentially of ignoring US sanctions when it came to using the US financial system to facilitate deals with Sudan and Cuba, and Iran as well.
And it was fined nearly $9 billion.
So there is a legal case already, as you mentioned there, relating to this French bank, about them contravening rules here and probably other people, as we've just mentioned there, the people in America, ex-Sudanese people they're probably waiting and launching their own cases now.
Mickey Bristow.
A temporary ceasefire that had brought relative calm on the border between Pakistan and Afghanistan appears to have been broken in an alleged Pakistani airstrike on the southeastern Paktika province.
The Taliban government in Afghanistan says at least eight people were killed in the attacks.
An Afghan cricket board official also said three of those killed on Friday evening were local cricket players.
The truce, which began on Wednesday, had halted a week of intense border clashes between the two countries.
Many civilians and soldiers from both sides had been killed in the fighting.
Our global affairs reporter Ambarasan Etirajan has been following the latest developments for us.
This all happened after Taliban accused Pakistan of violating the ceasefire by targeting a couple of areas in Paktika province by using drones and other assets to target.
But many civilians were killed, according to the Taliban authorities.
But we haven't heard anything from Pakistan side.
This all coming together.
Hours after a 48-hour ceasefire was declared between Pakistan and Afghanistan after a week of intense fighting along the border, in which dozens were killed.
And this comes off the back of an escalation in attacks between the two countries, especially since 2021 and when the Taliban retook Afghanistan.
According to Pakistani officials, since Taliban took over, more than 3700 people have been killed inside Pakistan due to attacks by Islamist insurgents.
And Islamabad accuses Kabul of providing safe havens to these Islamist militant groups.
Main issue bone of contention between the two countries that Kabul is providing some sort of sanctuary for these militants, a charge denied by the Taliban authorities.
And that is now escalating into a major crisis for between the two countries.
On the other hand, you have to see how Pakistan's position has changed.
The defense minister of Pakistan.
He was posting on social media a short while ago saying that When you see more and more action against our security forces, we will go after wherever the threat comes from.
So what it looks like the message seems to be as and when the attacks happen inside Pakistan, then Pakistan would respond.
And now they're saying we are not going to issue any diplomatic notes or appeal.
We are going for straightaway into action.
That means what some people call it as a new normal.
There were planned talks this weekend in Qatar between the two sides.
How will this affect those conversations?
The Taliban officials have been saying that they are planning to send a delegation to Qatar for talks with the Pakistani officials on how to diffuse tensions between the two countries.
So far Pakistan have not commented really about the talks, but they're confirmed about the talks as well, even though media has been reporting about these talks.
Now it becomes more complicated, given the latest round of attacks, how far both sides will be sitting together to discuss these matters.
But Countries like Saudi Arabia and Qatar have been putting pressure on both countries to engage in a dialogue to reduce tensions between the two countries.
At its peak, the Roman Empire stretched from Britain to the Nile River to the Persian Gulf.
But one place the Romans did not conquer was the city of New Orleans in the southern US.
So how did a memorial stone for an ancient Roman soldier end up in the back garden there, to be discovered by a woman clearing weeds?
Professor Suzanne Lusnier of the Department of Classical Studies at Tulane University spoke to Paul Henley.
I was sent an email by the homeowner who found it in her backyard.
And I looked at the photo and I just had a shiver up my spine because it looked like a genuine Roman inscription.
But to see that it was here in New Orleans in the garden in their backyard seemed very odd and unexpected, certainly.
To say the least, what did it say in Latin?
Yes.
Yes, so in Latin, it's a funerary inscription.
It says to the spirits of the dead for, or on behalf of Sextus Congenius Verus, soldier of the Praetorian fleet Misenensis from the tribe of the Bessi, who lived 42 years and served 22 years in the military on the trireme, Asclepius.
Atilius Carus and Vettius Longinus, his heirs, made this for him well-deserving.
But the obvious question now, how this gravestone found its way across the Atlantic?
We know that it's missing from a museum collection in Italy, do we?
Correct.
We knew that it came from the museum at Civitavecchia.
It had come from the old museum, the Museo Civico.
That museum was basically destroyed in bombings that happened in May of 1943.
Later on, there was a person from New Orleans who was serving in the USO.
Their job was to provide information. services for the military, in particular entertainment.
So he was a vocalist, a singer, who was based in Italy, and he was the one who had it.
It was in his house here in New Orleans.
His granddaughter saw the news story that our local news here in New Orleans ran about this on television, recognized it as something that had been in her grandfather's house and that she had acquired.
It had been handed down through the family and that she had been the one who put it into the.
By mid-May we had handed it over to the FBI, so they will handle it.
Eventually at some point there will be a transfer made and it will go back to that museum in Civitavecchia.
Professor Suzanne Lusnia.
She's already been credited with driving a new wave of fans to American football because of her relationship with the NFL star, Travis Kelsey.
Now it appears Taylor Swift's influence has spread to the world of fine art too.
A museum in central Germany is welcoming hundreds of extra visitors who have come to see a painting of Ophelia from Shakespeare's Hamlet, which inspired the imagery for Swift's new song, The Fate of Ophelia.
Chantal Hartel has this report, which starts with a word from Swift herself.
The album cover is a reference to the famous Ophelia painting, which then ends up being referenced in the music video.
Ophelia's plight is captured in a painting by the German artist Friedrich Heiser, thought to date back to the year 1900.
It shows her laying in a stream, surrounded by water lilies, white dress flowing, a dramatic downcast gaze the very pose Swift recreates in the opening scene of her video.
Initially, Swift's fans thought she had found her muse in the better-known older portrait of Ophelia by John Everett Millay, which hangs in the Tate Gallery in London.
But the colour of the dress and the angle of the pose then pointed them to Heiser –
Now hundreds of Swifties, as they're known, have been flocking to the museum in the city of Wiesbaden to see the art thought to have inspired their idol.
One family travelled to the museum from Hamburg, a five-hour drive away.
This fan from the US was impressed by the painting.
It's very ethereal and you can almost see the water flowing, the movement of it, the movement of the fabric, the contrast of the light and the dark.
It's beautiful.
It's breathtaking.
Despite long queues forming at times, museum director Andreas Henning said he was delighted to welcome all the new visitors.
Just last weekend, several hundred Zwifties were here.
I find it absolutely wonderful that they approach the art with great respect and maintain a good distance.
And when there are several of them, they naturally form a line so that each person can have a moment with the artwork.
Museum staff are still holding out for one extra special visitor though, Swift herself.
Chantal Hartel reporting.
And that's all from us for now, but there will be a new edition of the Global News Podcast later.
If you want to comment on this episode or the topics covered in it, you can send us an email.
The address is globalpodcast at bbc.co.uk.
You can also find us on X at BBC World Service and you can use the hashtag Global News Pod.
This edition was mixed by Martin Williams and produced by Peter Goffin and Anna Aslam.
And the editor is Karen Martin.
I'm Ankur Desai.
Until next time, goodbye.
America is changing, and so is the world.
But what's happening in America isn't just a cause of global upheaval.
It's also a symptom of disruption that's happening everywhere.
I'm Asma Khalid in Washington, D.C.
I'm Tristan Redman in London, and this is The Global Story.
Every weekday, we'll bring you a story from this intersection, where the world and America meet.
Listen on BBC.com or wherever you get your podcasts.
