NPR.
There has been a whirlwind of gargantuan AI deals recently, often involving OpenAI.
Oh, yes.
The softly spoken wizard of chat GPT, Sam Altman, has been busy.
There was this $300 billion deal with the database and cloud company Oracle.
Basically, OpenAI said it would buy $300 billion worth of computing power from Oracle.
But how would OpenAI pay for that?
It's unclear.
Yeah, we're going to get into that.
We'll also talk about NVIDIA.
It came in soon after, saying it would invest up to $100 billion in open AI.
It's all starting to get a little heady.
$100 billion here, $300 billion there.
NVIDIA paying open AI, who pays Oracle, who pays NVIDIA.
We're going to have to break it down.
This is The Indicator from Planet Money.
I'm Darian Woods.
And I'm Waylon Wong.
Today on the show, open AI's deals.
We look at the AI data center boom and how the world's most valuable startup is trying to win the AI race.
So you can try it yourself.
Just go to linkedin.com slash NPR pod.
That's linkedin.com slash NPR pod.
Terms and conditions apply.
Only on LinkedIn ads.
This message comes from The Economist.
Introducing The Economist Insider, a new video offering providing unprecedented access to The Economist journalists.
Twice weekly shows will feature in-depth debates and discussions with The Economist senior editors, as they share expertise and analysis to make sense of an increasingly complex and dangerous world.
More at economist.com slash insider.
To untangle all the OpenAI deals, we're going to start from the ground floor.
And what's happening on the ground floor is acres and acres and acres of data center construction from Las Vegas to Northern Virginia.
According to the Financial Times, around 12 of America's economic output is going to Amazon Microsoft, Meta and Google building data centers.
That's roughly $1,000 for every American.
The data center build-out is happening at an incredible rate right now.
Gil Luria is the head of technology research at D.A.
Davidson, an investment firm.
Microsoft Amazon, Google the largest companies in the land with almost infinite resources can't build data centers fast enough.
You need land.
You need access to power.
You need chips.
You need electricians and HVAC engineers.
But they have the resources, they have the capital, they have the money.
And so they're doing that to catch up to how good all these AI tools are getting.
So we can all use Sora to create silly little 10-second clips of cats giving us advice or raccoons fighting with each other and driving away.
I can just see that in my alley, IRL, late at night.
But more seriously, AI can be used for reviewing legal files, doing a lot of computer coding, grunt work or speeding up medical research.
Every few weeks, the many AI models keep hitting new benchmarks.
It feels kind of like the early days of search engines when we had AltaVista, Ask Jeeves.
Do you remember any more?
Oh, yeah, like Yahoo, MSN, Search.
Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.
So eventually a search engine came out that was better than all the others, and it could stay better at least partially, because it had so many users giving it data.
That was Google, of course.
Now this winner takes all dynamic may or may not apply to AI, but companies are acting as if it does, trying to become the best AI company, as if the best AI system is going to get most of the cash.
And that puts OpenAI in a tough situation.
They are a small, scrappy upstart competing in a sport of kings.
In order to participate in the AI market, you need tens of billions, if not hundreds of billions of dollars.
Gil says that Microsoft has that money.
So does Amazon, Google, Apple, Meta, and Elon Musk.
And so OpenAI needs to raise a lot of capital very fast in order to have access to the compute.
That will keep it competitive.
And that brings us to all those weird-seeming deals that OpenAI has been making.
The $300 billion promise to Oracle.
The $100 billion NVIDIA is investing in OpenAI.
And to think about whether these kinds of deals make sense.
Giloria says we have to make a distinction with all the AI data center investment.
There's a lot of stuff that's real.
The AI tools are fantastic.
There's a lot of companies willing to pay for access to those AI tools.
There is also a part that is an inflated demand environment.
That sounds like a euphemism to me, an inflated demand environment.
I'm trying to avoid using the word bubble.
Why use one word when you can use three?
He's not getting paid by the word, to be clear.
But seriously, the word bubble is kind of a loaded term in economics.
It's a situation where the price of an asset is way above what it's really worth, and it's followed by a panic and a crash.
But there's a debate over whether you can truly identify a bubble while it's happening, especially when the future is so unclear, like in technology.
Galleria isn't using the B word, but he does think the companies might be pumping up more excitement than is warranted.
NVIDIA Oracle OpenAI AMD, are engaged in this exercise of funding each other.
That creates the impression of demand that's even greater than it really is.
When OpenAI made a $300 billion commitment to Oracle, it didn't have that capital.
It won't have that capital.
That was artificial.
It's not real.
It's inflated.
That's not to say OpenAI is inflated.
OpenAI has phenomenal success and great products and great product design.
It's just that it's writing a lot of checks that it really can't cover anytime soon.
Yeah, where would it get that $300 billion from?
Well, good point.
They're going to have to raise all this capital mostly in the debt markets.
So they're going to have to get hundreds of billions of dollars of debt to finance a startup.
That's never happened, and it's unlikely to happen at that scale.
Again, OpenAI will be successful.
They have great products.
They'll continue to grow.
But right now, they're losing $10 billion a year.
I've heard Sam Altman say that making a profit is not even one of his top 10 concerns.
Yes, and that's understandable because startup companies rarely focus on profits first.
They focus on getting as many users as they can, and that's the mode OpenAI is in.
So yes, they'll continue to grow, but they just need to continue to fund their losses.
They can't make the type of commitments they're making and then live up to them.
So that part of the story is inflated.
If Gil is right and the recent open AI deals are inflated.
I mean, even Sam Altman told The Verge in August that he thought investors were getting overexcited.
Right.
And it does raise the question about what could happen to the rest of the economy.
These kinds of deals are not just limited to open AI.
Meta, XAI, Anthropic, these are other companies raising money in atypical ways right now.
And, like it or not, if you have a retirement account, a decent chunk of your money is invested in companies like Nvidia Microsoft Amazon, Google and Oracle.
And this web of deals ties their fates together to some extent.
So the question is, would OpenAI reneging on its commitments bring down the rest of the economy?
The glass half-empty view is that AI won't be as transformative as promised and that this could bring down companies and investors in some kind of chain reaction.
We'll just be left with these unused data centers humming all around the country to the chagrin of locals who are already pushing back at all this construction.
It would vanquish the one clear bright spot in an economy suffering from slow jobs growth and tariff uncertainty.
It'd be the inflated demand bursting.
We're not using the word bubble.
Yes, and that burst demand could trigger a recession.
No, don't say recession.
Well, there's good news.
Gil Luria doesn't actually share those concerns.
The AI build-out will continue.
It's just a matter of what parts of it are healthy and what parts of it are unhealthy.
The healthy part will continue.
The chats and the video generation and the voice interaction will make us all more productive.
We just need to get through the unhealthy parts in order to focus on the great benefits that are going to accrue to us from artificial intelligence.
Lots of railroad companies went under after the railroad booms and busts in the 1800s.
Yet we can still ride those tracks today.
Exciting new technology can be a bumpy ride.
And if you want to hear more about those fights between locals and AI data center construction, we have an episode coming out soon on that very topic.
Stay tuned.
This episode was produced by Angel Carreras for the engineering by Jimmy Keeley.
It was fact-checked by Sierra Juarez.
Kate Kincannon edits the show and The Indicator is a production of NPR.
Support for NPR and the following message come from Edward Jones.
A rich life isn't always a straight line.
Unexpected turns can bring new possibilities.
With 100 years of experience navigating ups and downs, Edward Jones can help guide you.
Let's find your rich together.
Edward Jones, member SIPC.
This message comes from NPR sponsor Charles Schwab with its original podcast on investing.
Each week hosts Lizanne Saunders, Schwab's chief investment strategist, and Kathy Jones, Schwab's chief fixed income strategist.
Along with their guests, analyze economic developments and bring context to conversations around stocks, fixed income, the economy and more.
Download the latest episode and subscribe at schwabcom slash, oninvesting or wherever you get your podcasts.
This message comes from NPR sponsor, Capella University.
Interested in a quality online education?
Capella is accredited by the Higher Learning Commission.
A different future is closer than you think with Capella University.
Learn more at capella.edu.
