Vice President JD Vance: No One Saw This Coming, The Ceasefire Is Real! | The Diary Of A CEO with Steven Bartlett

The Biden administration just really screwed up our immigration policy in a profoundly dangerous way.

But even if you agree that immigration is a problem, it seems division is the most compelling narrative for politicians.

I remember this particular quote about the black community where he said...

I'm a black man.

I feel like I've got things to lose.

And my concern is when the Western narrative is that it's the brown people that are the reason that your life is hard, or like Mexicans and murderers.

If I heard that from my political leaders, it's conceivable that I might be angry at my neighbor, even though they've done nothing.

But let me just say very often what the president is accused of saying he didn't say it or there was much greater context.

You wouldn't have said that.

But I think, well, the president and I certainly have way different styles.

But Donald Trump is much different as a human being than the media makes him out to be.

But back in 2016 there was a private message between you and a roommate where you said Trump was either a cynical arsehole or America's Hitler.

How do you go from that position to vice president of the same person?

What is that journey?

A crazy journey, man.

But look, I thought Donald Trump would be a failed president.

He was not.

I thought that American institutions were fundamentally functioning.

They were not.

You always have to be able to acknowledge when you're right and when you're like.

He's so non-conventional in the way that he does everything, that things that were previously unimaginable are actually on the table this peace deal with iran, for example.

But there's been lots of false deals.

Well, this one's real so.

And israel trump called netanyahu a very difficult guy.

What does netanyahu want?

I don't know.

What I would say is that we're different countries with different interests.

Do you trust them?

I don't really trust anybody.

Having seen the President of the United States operate, I feel quite confident that they are the junior partner.

We're the senior partner.

We are the world's superpower.

I'm going to take a little bit of a hard turn.

Do you think aliens could be real?

I do.

Mr. Vice President, I had no idea about your earliest context.

And it has informed what I've then seen from you later as an adult.

But can you take me back?

The emotion's still right on the surface for you.

Very much so.

Guys, I've got a favour to ask before this episode begins.

The algorithm, if you follow a show, will deliver you the best episodes from that show very prominently in your feed.

So when we have our best episodes on this show, the most shared episodes, the most rated episodes, I would love you to know.

And the simple way for you to know that is to hit that follow button.

But also, it's the simple, easy, free thing that you can do to help us make the show better.

And I would be hugely grateful if you could take a minute on the app you're listening to this on right now and hit that follow button.

Thank you so, so, so much.

Mr. Vice President, I have your book here, correct?

And it says of all the things that I hated about my childhood nothing compared to the revolving door of father figures.

I hated the disruption and I hated how often these boyfriends would walk out of my life just as I began to like them.

I always think to understand the people that are sat in front of me, you have to get a picture of their early context.

And I had no idea about your earliest context.

And it has in some respects informed what I've then seen from you later as an adult.

But can you take me back to your earliest context and explain that quote for me?

Yeah, so I was raised in very working class town, very working class family.

This is a photo of me when I was a little kid here.

And my family, like a lot of other families in similar circumstances, we struggled.

We struggled to adapt to middle class life.

Yeah, this is my sister and my grandfather.

My grandfather had very low formal education.

He graduated from high school.

My grandmother actually left school when she was 13.

Very religious people, particularly my grandmother, but they struggled pretty much economically for most of their lives.

My grandfather died when I was 13.

I think my grandmother died when I was 20.

And, you know, this is, yeah, this is right.

It's probably not even a year before she died.

And I was about to go to Iraq and she was very old and frail.

And this is one of the last photos of the two of us.

And this is really the woman who raised me because you raised the revolving door father figures.

So mom, amazing person she's been clean and sober for now 11 years, but she was was in the throes of a pretty bad addiction problem for much of my childhood, and so this was kind of my savior.

This was the person who stepped in and made sure i had a stable life to the extent that i did and your grandmother.

She got pregnant at 13, correct?

And she had a miscarriage at that age.

Yeah, that's right.

So think about this.

Eastern Kentucky.

You're talking about the hills of an extremely impoverished, very rural part of the United States of America.

And so, you know, she is dating my grandfather, I think at the time of 16.

She's 13.

So these are children.

She gets pregnant.

They moved to Ohio for more opportunity because you just couldn't build a good life for yourself.

There weren't enough good jobs in that part of the world.

And she had a miscarriage.

So like the thing that brought her out of her home I think hastened them getting married.

I don't think they would've gotten married at 13 and 16 were it not for this unplanned pregnancy.

She was kind of in it then.

So they're married.

They have a very chaotic marriage, an abusive marriage in a lot of ways, but they have three kids my mom, my uncle, my aunt.

And the story of our family is, in some ways, Some of us were able to kind of break the cycle and some of us weren't.

And part of what motivated me to write that book was trying to understand why is it?

Why is it that life worked out for some of us and didn't work out for others?

So your biological father?

Yeah.

He put you up for adoption?

So he did.

So I was adopted by a man when I was five or six years old by the name of Robert Hamill.

And he became, and it's still technically.

If you look at my birth certificate, he is still listed as my legal father.

Now, he was in the picture from call it.

I was seven until 10 or 11.

And then he and mom got divorced.

He still stuck around for a little bit after that.

But by the time I was 12 years old, he was just gone forever.

Never talked to him again, never saw him again.

And am I right in thinking this is the third man in your life at this point?

Because your sister, Lindsay, comes from a different father.

That's right.

So her father, very good guy.

She's five or six years older than me.

And so he was the first of my mother's husbands.

And then my dad, my biological father was number two.

And then my legal father was number three.

And then, you know, things sort of got a little quicker from that point forward.

So there was more turnover, let's say, in the relationships at that point forward.

There was also a guy called Matt thereafter at 13 years old that your mom...

Yeah, good guy.

Very close to him.

He actually is very political.

And so he and I reconnected a little bit over our shared interest in politics.

But he was just a good, hardworking guy.

You know, he was only around for maybe a few years, probably less than that in my life.

But he was a significant and positive force.

In your book, Page 124, you say living with mum and Matt, which is when you were 14 years old, was like a front row seat to the end of the world.

Yeah, yeah.

Well, it was just chaotic, right?

I mean things that I thought of as normal, that I later realized in talking to my wife or talking to friends, that just a level of relationship instability

You know, fighting people, throwing stuff.

If the fights get really bad, some person throws a plate at somebody else.

Again, it sounds even talking about it now kind of crazy, but it was pretty normal back then.

And, you know, sometimes it was worse and sometimes it was better.

But there was a sense in which relationships were always just kind of chaotic.

As an adult you know, like you can almost imagine now that you've got so many kids yourself that I can understand the feeling of craziness being normal and you kind of don't realise until you see into someone else's world or someone else hears about yours.

Because I can relate to that in many ways.

But as an adult, you must look back on that and now see the way that that shaped you.

Yeah, well, it's very unhealthy.

I certainly think, again, it was hard to sort of really feel a sense of stability.

It was hard to really attach to people because you always assumed that they were going to be gone.

And, you know, years later, I was I was talking to I was actually at a conference.

I was giving a speech and this guy came up to me and he was a child psychologist.

And you know he said you know, one of the things the literature shows is that people who come from traumatic or chaotic environments and end up doing pretty well, they always have one person, whether it was a teacher, a social worker, a grandparent, aunt or an uncle.

They always have one person who's sort of their anchor.

And that seems to be the difference for a lot of these kids.

And again, I was lucky enough to have that.

And I think about my life a lot of time.

Sitting here, I'm the vice president of the United States.

What would my life have turned out to be if you'd had all that chaos, which was just a background part of my life?

But you take out those stabilizing forces.

God knows, man.

Your grandmother.

My grandmother.

That's right.

Because, through your story, when I was reading about your childhood, she seemed like the safe place that you would retreat to over and over again.

You know, obviously I think it's very important for boys to have male role models, to have father figures that they look up to.

She was in an unconventional way, like both a mother figure and a father figure.

She was extraordinarily odd.

And I mean that in the most loving way possible.

But she was just incredibly tough.

You know, I was...

I don't know, 12, 13.

I was hanging out with one of the kids in the neighborhood who was kind of going down a bad path.

He actually would later spend some time in jail, but he was getting into drugs, starting to smoke weed, starting to do a little bit more than that.

Again, 12, 13.

So we were pretty young kids.

My grandmother found out and she told me that if I kept on hanging out with this kid, she was going to run him over with her car.

And then I was like kind of caught off guard by that.

And she said, J.D., I promise you, and no one will ever find out about it.

And I was like, whoa.

So like for the sake of this kid, I pretty much stopped hanging out with him.

But that toughness, I think, was like a necessary part.

It was like through sheer willpower that she kept me on the straight and narrow.

And again, I don't know where I'd be without her.

And over the next sort of couple of decades, your mother's addiction seems to get worse and worse.

It does.

From prescription drugs to heroin and everything in between.

And it really sort of ravages not just her life, but the family's life.

That's right.

Nearly making your grandparents bankrupt.

Yes.

And mom, by the way, has been clean and sober for 11 years, which is an amazing thing.

But when Papaw died, he was what my grandmother was for me.

I sort of realized that that's what Papaw was for mom.

He was her safe place.

He was her anchor.

And I think she already had some addiction problems.

But it just really accelerated from there and things kind of went off the rails.

And, you know, my grandparents, before my grandfather died, were trying various ways to help her.

And, yeah, it got worse and worse, harder and harder drugs, had a few bad overdoses.

And you know, by the grace of God, some miracle, you know it's.

It's amazing how transformed she is.

And it sort of drives home how, for some people, drugs are just they take so much away from a human being.

And she was certainly that that way, in the same way that they took so much away from her sobriety, has given her a whole lot back.

If I asked your wife how this season of your life, the most formative season of your life, has changed you, what are all the things she would say?

It's funny because I remember interviewing, I think it was Michael Jordan's coach.

And he said to me that people's dark sides and their light sides are like, fundamentally interconnected.

Yes.

And I can relate.

Absolutely.

The things people might clap for or applaud about you're also fundamentally linked to the things that you struggle with or that make you sometimes not the most normal person.

Yes, that makes total sense to me.

I think on the dark side, what she would say is, I am an extraordinary mistrust.

I think of people that I don't know particularly well.

I sort of assume the worst sometimes about circumstances and things outside of my control, but I maybe assume the best about the people themselves, right?

So there's an inherent like sense that the world is going to fall apart.

I think that's a very true thing.

Even in our marriages, it would be hard to imagine.

I'm saying all marriages are work, but it'd be hard to imagine a marriage that was more successful and more happy than ours.

Our kids are doing great.

They're healthy.

Like my wife and I love each other very much, but we're also just like she really is my best friend.

She's the person I talk to about everything.

She's my closest confidant.

And yet...

There are all kinds of times during our 12 year marriage where I've just had this thought like there's no way this is going to last either, because she's taking the kids to the grocery store.

And I start thinking to myself, oh, my God, a drunk driver is going to have a head on collision.

I just there's a sense of like instability that is very much built in.

That's that's kind of the dark.

I think the light is because I've seen a lot of people at their very best and their very worst.

I sort of assume the best about the human beings themselves.

So, even though the circumstances are crazy and even though shit hits the fan, sometimes completely outside of your control, I think what you would say is that I probably have a higher empathy quotient than any person that she knows.

Mm-hmm.

And I really try to understand what makes people tick.

And so there's the light and the dark together.

But there's a lot beyond that.

I mean, look, I mean, it was a lot of work.

When I look back at our early relationship and we'd have an argument like before we were married and, and I'd be like OK well fine, let's just break up.

And her response is like, well, that's crazy.

Why would we break up?

Let's just like have a rational conversation.

Like, honey, I don't do rational conversations in this context.

That is not something we do.

But again.

So long as you're, I think, self-aware about that, it's a problem that you can solve.

And certainly.

I mean, I think she would say now, compared to 14 years ago when we first started dating, it's just night and day.

But very early on it was a chaotic relationship, itself clearly an avoidant attachment style, which obviously makes a hundred percent.

Yeah, i can relate and yeah, i didn't have the vocabulary to describe that, but that's exactly what that was.

Did you have to go to like couples therapy?

Because it seems almost inconceivable that you could go through that early context, be so avoidant, be sort of on edge with commitment and see everything as kind of being ephemeral, yet still have a healthy relationship like the one you have with her.

No, never went to couples therapy.

I actually went to like therapy a couple of times and I just found it way too uncomfortable to talk to a stranger.

And so, you know... It's just uncomfortable.

No, no.

I mean, this is... I guess this is kind of a weird kind of therapy, but no, it's...

It's just the idea.

The other thing I really didn't like about it, and again, I don't mean this to criticize therapy.

I'm sure it helps a lot of people.

So please don't take this the wrong way.

But there was something about it that felt almost too self-referential and too, like, it almost encouraged at least me to, to blame others or to blame my past or to blame my mom.

I really didn't like this feeling that I was sort of giving up agency over my own life.

And so we've just gotten better at how we relate to each other.

That's primarily me.

I mean, she grew up in a very stable situation.

So her parents are South Asian immigrants to the United States of America.

But she was born and raised in San Diego, California.

You know, just very normal, middle class, Southern California life.

And I think because of that she just had much healthier let's say much healthier relationship practices than I did.

That point about understanding the person on the other end and having empathy for the human being politics.

Yeah.

Because I watch the election campaigns.

I watch how like yourself as president went against people like Kamala Harris.

Sure.

So you must, with that logic, think that Kamala Harris is actually like a really good person.

Like you must understand Kamala.

I don't, I don't have, I wouldn't say that I understand her.

I would say that I just don't have this animosity towards people on the other side.

But is that not like sort of implicit in the job itself that you have to point out their faults?

Yeah, no, absolutely.

But I think you can be sort of rational about it.

You can be cerebral about it.

Certainly, there are things the other side does that annoy me.

But, you know, like my fundamental bias is that just most people are good people.

And to the extent that they do something you disagree with, it's either because they screwed up on something or because they made a mistake, or

I just – I've always been like this.

I've always been more charitable about other human beings.

And I don't know.

Again, maybe I do that too much.

Maybe I'm too charitable.

But I'd rather be too charitable than too cynical about human beings because that – I mean –

You talk about a screwed up perspective to take into politics.

If you're always cynical about other people's motivations man, you're going to be in a very, very bad spot.

I actually think the same about interviewing, remarkably.

No, absolutely.

I meet so many people from so many different – Yeah, of course.

And one of the things that I've come to learn is just try and meet everybody as I experience them, versus like –.

Especially when I'm interviewing politicians, it's I just want to meet them as I experience them, versus thinking about how they've been framed or whatever.

And it's actually made me much more empathetic because again, obviously we all have preconceptions.

And then you meet someone and you go, oh, they are a family person.

They care about X, Y, and Z. They care about the same things.

They just disagree about pathways.

Yeah, yeah, of course.

But politics seems to be like the sort of game of politics to me seems to be like paint, the other side to be malicious.

Well, I think the game of politics, I mean, fundamentally, you're making a pitch to people, right?

It's not about Kamala Harris or Donald Trump or J.D.

Vance or Tim Walz.

It's about the American people, right?

And fundamentally, to make that sales pitch, you have to say, what's better about this product?

What's worse about the other product?

So that is just inherent.

But again, I think you can do that.

You know, what I always try to do is I try to talk about here are the policies that are really bad.

Here are the reasons why I think this is screwed up.

Here are the reasons why I think that she made mistakes.

But I, you know. it is weird.

It is fundamentally.

You are in a position where you're trying to point out the faults in another people, even if it's just their conduct, as opposed to their character.

But even with that, I again I do think that you see people in politics who who fundamentally just really hate the people on the other side.

That's just not me.

It's never going to be me.

Even when I'm being very pugilistic, like even when you really have to drive home a point like I you know not to get too much into the weeds of of partisan politics, but like something I think the Biden administration just like really screwed up in a profoundly dangerous way was the was our immigration policy right now.

There are all kinds of reasons why that might have happened.

But fundamentally, that was a very, very, very bad screw up.

But I don't hate Kamala Harris because I think she had a bad immigration policy.

I just think it's important to point out the flaws.

On the immigration policy.

I mean, I've still got to go through your chart, but on this point of immigration, this is another area where you get such division.

Sure.

And you get.

You know, I remember watching the.

There was a couple of things I remember watching when I was I think I was probably back in Plymouth in the countryside

One of them was like Trump, the president demonizing Mexican people and brown people.

I remember this particular quote, which I've always struggled with a little bit, where he said about the black community what have you got to lose?

And I remember thinking, I'm a black man.

I feel like I've got things to lose.

That kind of narrative about those individuals, that broad strokes narrative, sort of demonization of them, would make people's lives harder and feels unnecessary.

Even if you agree that immigration is a problem, the the sort of like skin color or religion, or like mexicans, rapists and murderers is is might, might galvanize in the near term, but in the long term is probably going to sow division and that's probably net negative for society.

Well, one thing I'd say just about anything that I've ever heard the president say that's then refracted through the lens of social media or, you know, non-social media very often, what he is accused of saying, he didn't say it, or he said it in a totally different way, or there was much greater context.

So like I, like I remember, for example, like I remember back in 2016 or 2015, whenever he said this Sort of being like offended at the rapists and murderers line.

And then I went and looked at what he said.

And what he said, which is actually true, is that some of these countries are actually encouraging prisoners to come into the United States of America.

Does that mean that every person comes into America as a rapist or a murderer or as a prisoner?

No, it doesn't.

But he didn't say that.

So again this goes back to the point about being charitable is I do try to understand fundamentally like why did a person say that?

What are they actually thinking?

What are they trying to get across?

And again, if you disagree, that's fine.

But I think – well, the president and I certainly have way different styles.

Absolutely, we have different styles.

But I mean the way that I talk about immigration.

I'd say that's one of the issues where we've always been like extremely closely aligned, and that was obviously a major issue during the 2024 campaign.

But the way that I think about immigration is fundamentally like as a country, you are the people who live in your nation.

OK, so America's 330 million souls, you know.

I think again, most of them, whether they voted for me or not, they're really good people and they want really good things for their families.

They want really good things for themselves.

And, yeah, they're like some bad apples in every crew, 330 million people.

There are definitely some bad people, but most people are fundamentally good and decent.

However.

You could let people into your country who could be fun decent, normal human beings who just kind of mess with the equation a little bit.

It's like if I have a bunch of people over to my house for dinner and I invite 10 people to come over for dinner and one of them brings a stranger,

That's probably going to be fun.

Right.

But if, like every single one of them, bring three strangers, it's going to totally change the character of the conversation that you're going to have, of the room that you're going to have.

A country's like that, just on a much more massive scale.

So, I maybe come at it or I describe it a different way.

But fundamentally I think that the president was very right about immigration in a way that was prescient.

And even if the blunt way that he described it offended some people, I think it was a very important contribution to not just our country but to the world.

I think it would be hard to find an American who didn't think we needed again.

I'm not an American, so I guess I'm talking about where I'm from, but we needed borders and a policy around borders.

Sure.

Just in the same way that we have it around our house and every festival we enjoy and whatever venue we go to.

Exactly.

I think the thing I've always been concerned about when I see the sort of rising narrative across the world not just in America but now across the West, the UK as well is in trying to solve that problem.

It seems that like division is the most compelling narrative for politicians.

And then the like downstream consequence of division you see playing out on the streets.

Yeah.

You see like, especially in the UK at the moment, you're really seeing certain communities be quite demonized and victimized because of this broad political narrative which is being used to get people into power.

But then the downstream consequences of like real people on the streets that are brown or black or Muslims is like I don't think the people at the top consider that.

Well, I mean, is there another way of making the point on immigration legal immigration without demonizing people?

Well, I certainly.

When I talk about it, to the extent that I demonize anybody on the immigration conversation, I demonize the leadership that is immune to thinking about the consequences of this.

And so just this, this point about division.

Division is a very interesting word to me because i think division is very bad.

Like i like living in a, in a community that's cohesive, where people get along or we love everybody, regardless of what they look like or what they, what thoughts they might have in their head.

But like, let me give you like a slightly different perspective on the division thing.

What if division is not the result of politicians demonizing certain groups, but what if division is the inevitable consequence of when the population changes too quickly, too fast in a given society?

And what you see as politicians exploiting division.

I actually think that what they're trying to do is articulate a feeling that people have.

And sometimes people might express that feeling in ways that we don't like, or maybe they're offensive.

But fundamentally, like, let's just say you're –

You're a working class guy in Britain or you're a working class guy in the United States of America.

And, you know, somebody moves in your neighborhood.

I did.

Yeah.

So my black family, my family's black.

My mom's Nigerian.

And I came from Botswana and I moved into a white neighborhood.

Okay.

And I mean, how do people treat you? we were called the N-word a couple of times.

That's terrible.

I don't like that.

But I imagine that a lot of people in your community were welcoming.

Yeah, they were, for sure.

But as a kid, you only remember the ways you stand out.

No, no, of course.

I can be like, yeah, I understand that.

And I certainly think it's important to try to fight back against that stuff.

We don't want young kids who come into a community for that to be like their memory.

But like I also, like our next door neighbor was black family.

And my grandmother was not woke.

She did not have progressive views about race or gender or pretty much anything else.

But like she really loved I'll never forget this the black man who lived next door to us.

She said he has a good heart and that was her highest compliment of anybody.

He was a preacher.

The family was like a very, very good family, stable family, mom, dad, few kids.

And I was very close to the young son.

And I just...

I did not experience that.

When people talk about division, I just did not see that family as substantially different from us.

And I don't think that family.

I'm sure they experienced racism but I don't think that was like a common fixture of their day living in that neighborhood.

Where Mammal really did resist the changes is when we had a few people like.

The neighborhood went downhill very quickly.

And I talk about that a little bit in the book.

And you had a bunch of people move in with different habits.

And you had a woman who, you know, she said a bath, but then she got drunk and passed out.

And so she ruined her entire house.

And you know, at some level Was it wrong for my grandmother to feel offended that her neighborhood had changed so quickly, so fast that she never felt she didn't feel comfortable there anymore.

Or the people who came in had different values, or she couldn't hold a conversation with somebody in the same way.

You know, I got attacked by this on this during the campaign in twenty twenty four.

When I said you know, it's actually OK if you're an American, an English native speaker, it's actually OK for you to want the person who moves in next to you to speak English, not because you're a racist or a xenophobe, but because you want to be able to talk to the person you share a community with.

And so what I often see is that division gets magnified when statesmen don't do the job of actually ensuring that integration is possible.

And for integration to be possible, it has to be, I think, slow moving.

You have to be careful, right?

100 people moving into a community is different from 10 people moving into a community.

You often make sure that everybody has economic opportunities.

Right.

It's one thing to welcome a newcomer when everybody has access to a good job.

But you welcome a newcomer when a lot of people are feeling economically distressed.

They're going to react to it totally differently.

So, again, this is maybe me being charitable to people you think I shouldn't be charitable to.

But fundamentally like, my job as an elected leader is is to create the kind of environment where division happens less.

It's not to pretend that division doesn't exist.

People naturally, I think, feel reactive when things change too quickly, and that's okay.

No, I understand the sort of human instinct of, I guess, of kind of like xenophobia in a way.

And I think... we all would want our neighbor to be able to connect with our neighbor.

I think it's like the point of nuance is when they can't speak my language.

What do I then do about that?

And I think you know, maybe if my neighbor didn't speak my language we might not get along because we wouldn't be able to connect and talk, but I wouldn't be angry at them.

And my concern is from a high level, when the sort of Western narrative now is that it's the brown people that are the reason that your life is hard.

If I believed that, if I heard that from my political leaders, it's conceivable that I might be angry at my neighbour, even though they've done nothing.

Just their presence alone might make me resent them a little bit.

And then what happens when I resent them?

Because I'm being told that they're the reason that I'm suffering.

They're the reason I don't have a job.

And then we get into these cultural wars. which is a slippery slope.

Yeah, I hear you.

But what I would say is I'm not mad and I said this on the campaign trail all the time I'm not mad at the illegal alien who broke our laws and came into the country.

Some of them probably didn't even know they were breaking our laws.

Who came into our country and wanted better opportunity for their families.

What I am mad is the political system.

I don't know, right?

It's hard to say.

But I am mad at the political system that encourages people to break those rules and sows division and then gets mad at the native population for looking around and saying wait a second, I didn't sign up for this.

I didn't agree to this.

So I just – like I don't know what you describe that.

I would say there's an instinct in every human being to want to share a community with people where you've got something in common with okay.

And it's like everything, right?

A little bit of spice is good.

Too much spice changes the dynamic a little bit.

And I think most people –

They're OK with change, but change that happens too fast, too quickly.

I think in an immigration context is very, very bad for a country.

And I think you guys have had that.

We've had that.

A lot of European countries have had that.

I don't even feel particularly angry at any country because it's a mistake that all of us made.

But now that you see that, I mean, you rightly call it division.

I just think that we have to say, wait a second.

Let's try to do things a slightly different way.

I think algorithms also play a big role in that because of the design.

Oh, 100%.

Yeah, absolutely.

But that's probably another conversation.

I do think though, if my family were struggling or at all in danger or at risk, and there was a, an area of land over there that offered them a better chance.

I personally think for the sake of my family.

If my family was struggling, I would try and move my family into that area.

And I assume you would do the same.

I assume you would, if your family I've got this wonderful photo of your kids and your wife where if America went to catastrophe and Mexico was doing great, would you not try and get into Mexico, even if it wasn't?

You didn't have a visa.

I know.

I don't think I would.

I mean, I can understand why some people have to move.

You need to eat.

You need to provide for your family.

But you know, I think that this is another thing about, about the immigration thing that is that is challenging is

You know, you want people to feel a certain rootedness and a certain devotion to their country.

You know, one of the things that's very unique about America compared to Europe is this poll question that went around when I was a teenager maybe I was in my early 20s.

And it asked what percentage of young people in that society would die for their country if they had to.

Like, I'm not excited about the idea, but would actually do it.

In the United States, it was something like 70%.

And in all the other Western countries, it was like 20% to 35%.

And so, you know, you talk about like, okay, moving to Mexico because there's economic opportunity.

In a universe where Mexico is flourishing and America is struggling –

I get what you're saying, that you want people to move and migrate to the place where they can have a chance of feeding their family.

But, like I love this place in a way that is totally independent of the economic opportunities it provides to my children.

There's something much deeper and there's a connection to the places, to the memories, to the folkways.

I mean, I drive through Eastern Kentucky man, and those beautiful rolling hills and even mountains, but they're all mountains that are alight with life because they're you know.

It's not the Rockies.

You go to West Virginia.

You should do this.

It's the most beautiful area, I think, in the world, because you get the mountains and you get the rivers and you get that.

But it's also so green and rich with life.

I feel an attachment to it that is very, very unique.

But even if your family were at risk, you wouldn't move them into Mexico, right?

Well, I mean look, the story of my family, my grandparents, is.

They came from eastern Kentucky and moved to southern Ohio, not exactly that far away.

These are two very close areas.

But they moved away, even though they didn't want to, because of economic opportunity to provide for their families.

So I certainly empathize with that.

I mean yeah, if somebody showed up, I mean, like I'm the vice president, I have a secret service detail.

It's hard to put myself in this perspective right now.

But if, like somebody, showed up to my home in Cincinnati and pointed a gun at my head and said you have to leave or we're going to kill your children, I'd leave right.

But I think most migration decisions are not actually that consequential and extreme.

Makes sense.

Yeah.

This young man here.

You ultimately go into the Marine Corps.

I go to the Marine Corps.

Yeah.

So this is this is me in, I believe, right after boot camp.

So 2003, maybe.

Yeah, I think 2003.

This is me.

This photo is taken in boot camp.

And this is I'm pretty sure this is taken in Iraq, actually.

This is either in 2005 or 2006, at a point when the Iraq War was not going well.

Why did you go to the Marine Corps?

What was the decision?

You know...

There was this sense – and in hindsight, I really resent this.

I'm genuinely still angry at George W. Bush over this, even though, again, I try to be charitable.

I have friends who work for him, think he's a great guy.

I'm not saying he's not.

But when I was a senior in high school, I remember –

I'm at a restaurant, it's called Skyline Chili in Southwestern Ohio.

And this guy comes out of Skyline Chili, he's got like a World War II red veteran's hat.

We call them red hatters in the United States.

So he was a veteran of World War II.

And I remember feeling like – because even at that stage, this was probably 2003, 2002 maybe.

I remember thinking to myself, this generation is dying away.

Like I had this feeling, right?

Because most veterans you met, they were veterans of Vietnam, maybe of the first Iraq War.

But I just went up and I shook his hand.

I said, thank you, sir, for your service.

And he was like genuinely touched.

But I remember thinking this guy answered the call.

Now we have to answer the call.

You know, September the 11th happened when I was a junior in high school.

And there was this patriotic sense of this is our World War Two.

Right.

And even some of the historical analogies that got used were the exact same.

Saddam Hussein was Adolf Hitler.

What if you had had an opportunity to stand up and say no to Adolf Hitler when he annexed the state land?

Wouldn't you have taken that chance?

And it's like they were so good at tapping into that patriotic reservoir.

And by the way, I think that reservoir is a very valuable thing.

I think it's important for statesmen to cultivate it, but only to tap into it when it's really necessary and when it's really justified.

And what was so screwed up about Iraq is I remember like I went to the Marine Corps recruiter.

And I wanted to be a Marine because my older cousins were Marines and people said the Marines were the toughest.

Whether that's true or not, that was certainly the impression that Marines had of themselves.

I signed on the dotted line.

I went in what's called open contract.

So sometimes you sign up and you have your job assigned like.

You already know what you're going to do.

I went to open contract.

I said, you can give me whatever job you want to.

I just want to be a Marine.

And I did that because I loved my country and I wanted to contribute in the same way that that guy who wore a red hat was still wearing his red hat, was still proud of it, knew that he contributed.

And you know that led me, of course, to go to Iraq from 2005 to 2006 and made a lot of friends, gained a ton of appreciation for the Marine Corps as an institution and the people but, you know, became a little jaded about our political leadership.

Why – you said you were kind of annoyed at Bush.

Because – that patriotic reservoir that exists in any country.

I think it's maybe most powerful in the United States of America because again we have this 70 plus percent of young people say they would die for their country.

That's very unique among advanced economies.

And I'm sure a lot of people in Europe look at that and say, oh those jingoistic idiots, they're wrong or there's something bad about that.

But I actually think to have a real nation you have to have the willingness that, if God forbid something happens, you're willing to put on your uniform and go and do what needs to be done.

But again, in order for that to work –

In order for that feeling to be justified, leaders have to not take advantage of it.

You can't say Saddam Hussein is Adolf Hitler.

He wasn't.

You got to be careful with it.

And I don't think that George W. Bush was careful with it.

I think that he called the nation to do something that ultimately, wasn't actually in our best interest as a nation.

But, more fundamentally, he drew on that wellspring of patriotism to direct us to do something that we shouldn't have been doing in the first place.

Because he had bad information or because of negligence or incompetence?

I don't, I mean, I, you know, I know enough people who know him.

I think he had bad information, but, you know, fundamentally, like, Post 9-11 was really important.

We had to go and deal with the terrorist networks that had existed all across the world, that had been allowed to fester over the previous generation of American negligence.

But fundamentally.

The war on terrorism was not an existential thing to the United States of America in the way that, like World War II, was an existential thing for Britain right.

And I think we just – we have to be careful about how we describe what we're asking our young people to do, because if you ask them to do something and they feel like you were being honest with them –

I think that sort of pays dividends into that patriotic reservoir.

If you ask somebody to do something and it turns out you were lying to them, whether it was intentional or not, I think you draw down that patriotic reservoir.

I don't know what the.

By the way, I mentioned that, that poll, and you know I don't have the information on the data in front of me.

But whatever the number of Americans, young Americans, who say they would die for their country, I would bet my, I'd bet a lot of money that that number in twenty twenty six is much lower than it was in two thousand three.

So it's really like a sort of a contract with the nation.

Exactly.

It's a social contract built on trust.

You violate that trust, it has very, very bad consequences.

If you're going to take tips from anyone on how to stay focused and high energy, let it be from the greatest pound-for-pound fighter of all time, the guy they call Johnny Bones Jones.

John is a co-owner of our show sponsor, Ketone IQ, alongside myself.

And when you hear why, it probably makes a lot of sense to you.

When he's training or fighting, he needs high quality, steady, laser-like focus without the crash.

And ketones give him exactly that.

And unlike caffeine, ketones don't stimulate your brain, they fuel it.

So your brain actually loves ketones because it runs on them much more efficiently than anything else.

And right now Ketone IQ is giving away one of a kind pair signed MMA gloves from John Jones himself and the upcoming gold medal wrestler he's coaching, called Gable Stevenson.

They are very, very rare.

And if you want your shot at winning them, go to ketone.com slash steven20 to win.

No purchase necessary.

Terms and conditions apply.

And you'll also get 30 off your first subscription order, exclusive Ketone IQ, merch and, of course, your shot at these signed gloves.

I don't speak Vietnamese, but this show can because of AI video technology from our sponsor, HeyGen.

I get messages every single week from those of you listening to the Diary of a CEO all around the world and you express how much impact it's had on you and your life.

And if that's true, then those conversations shouldn't only reach people in English.

K-Gen can take one recording of me and deliver it in any language, while keeping my voice, timing and expressions intact.

But you don't need a studio like this to make it work for you.

Record 15 seconds of yourself and get an AI avatar that delivers studio quality video in over 175 languages.

We're up to 20 languages now, and we're not the only ones using it.

Hey Jan is already used by 30 million people, including 85% of the Fortune 100.

Whether you're building an audience on social media, launching an online course or rolling out training across your team, check out HeyGen now.

Your first three videos are totally free at heygen.com slash DOAC.

That's H-E-Y-G-E-N dot com slash DOAC.

See you there.

The US is, I guess, in a war now.

Well, not anymore famous last words fair, because we are in a ceasefire that i feel very good about.

Okay that we announce i know this will air later but we announced the ceasefire.

We announced the the peace agreement with the iranians yesterday.

Yes, i've learned so much about war because of this war, In part because I'm an interviewer at the time of war.

And so I've been having lots of conversations with lots of people about the nature of war.

And I've learned so much.

Frankly, I didn't know anything about Vietnam and really the psychology of war.

And how, like when you start a war.

Robert Pape said this to me.

He said the thing people underestimate about war is when the bombs start dropping.

Politics changes both where the bombs are dropping and at home.

And I to some degree think that with the Iran war now, that's like exactly what happened from my assessment of it, which is it looked like it was going to be quite straightforward.

Drop the bombs, take out the leader. the people rise up, which is what the president had said.

He had encouraged the people to rise up when those bombs dropped and Khomeini was taken out.

But then what then happened?

Again, I don't know what I'm talking about here, so please correct me, is it looked like the country kind of fractured into all of these sort of little pockets of militia and military?

I remember, I think it was Hegseth saying, it just takes some time for the carrier pigeon to get out to where the soldiers are, the outpost.

And this speaks to how the fracturing had happened.

And then I heard the president and, I think yourself, multiple times say like we don't really know who we're negotiating with, or words to that effect, because we've taken out the first and second row of leadership.

And then I thought gosh, we're in the same situation again, where the bombs started dropping unintended consequences, where there's now not one central leadership to negotiate with, but also politics at home has shifted.

I mean, the approval ratings have...

I got this graph of the approval.

Ratings had started to plummet at home and politics is changing on the ground there as well.

Is this another forever war?

Well, the answer is no.

And this is always when I I talked about this, this conflict, I always said Donald Trump learned the lessons.

It's actually that's almost unfair to him.

He didn't learn the lessons of the Iraq war because back during the Iraq war he was saying this was stupid.

We should get out of Iraq.

He was saying that back then.

And I think that, while there were certainly some objectives that we had in this conflict, I just never had any doubt.

Now, obviously, I'm an insider.

I saw the president's deliberations and thought on this, but I never had any worry about that this would become a multi-year expedition with no end in sight, because I knew that we had leadership that was trying to define the objective very narrowly, accomplish the objective and then see where we are.

And so you know, if you go back, you talk about this, this street uprising.

Certainly there was some thought that it would be possible that the Iranian street would rise up in the face of this thing and that you would see, you know, a new government that was much more pro-American, much more pro-Western.

What happened, though, is what we knew we could do is degrade their military.

That was actually the primary objective.

Yes, the president talked about the Iranians rising up, but the primary objective was always to degrade their conventional power so that we could be in a better position vis-a-vis Iran, so that, whoever was calling the shots, they didn't have a loaded gun to our head anymore.

Okay,

And that's what we knew we could accomplish.

And then there was always the question about okay, now that we've accomplished that, where do we go from here?

And one of the things that I feel just quite good about this moment that we're in is the president basically bought us an option.

He said, we can weaken their military, destroy their conventional military, we can change their leadership and then we can actually present a pathway to the Iranian leadership.

Where do we go from here?

Like you said something very interesting that was true two months ago.

That's not true now.

Two months ago, I would have said I had no idea who we're negotiating with.

Absolutely.

Now I feel very confident that we have an understanding of who we're negotiating with, what it is that they care about.

Who?

Yes, there are fractures in their system.

So the Iranian system, this is oversimplifying it a lot, but it has kind of three poles.

There's the political pole, the people who are most responsive to leadership.

That's the foreign minister, the president, the speaker of the parliament.

There's a clerical pole.

Meaning the clerics, who actually hold ultimate authority in the Iranian system via the supreme leader.

The clerics, the religious leaders,

And then you have the military, particularly the IRGC.

All three of these poles interact with each other in weird ways.

And one of the things we definitely two months ago.

We were like wait a second, who has the upper hand?

What does this group want versus this group versus that group?

But what I feel pretty confident about now.

I mean, we're taping this interview I guess June 15th, right?

What I feel quite confident about right now is that we know who we're dealing with and the fractures really aren't.

You know, the system is kind of coalesced.

And what they're telling us, which is interesting.

Now, is it the street rising up?

No.

But what they're telling us is you know what you know.

Obviously they're not like endorsing anything that we did.

There's a lot of mistrust, a lot of animosity, but you know fundamentally, we've done one thing vis-a-vis the United States for 47 years and we shouldn't do that thing anymore.

We want to change.

And if you, the Americans, are willing to actually negotiate with us, to have a conversation.

Yeah, we're willing to make the long-term commitment never to develop nuclear weapons, but we want a totally different economic arrangement than what we have with the West right now.

So that's where we're at right now is actually figuring out the details of what that would look like.

But where we stand right now, I actually feel pretty good about it.

I feel good that we actually could have a better relationship with that country.

I feel good that they'll never have a nuclear weapon.

So that'd be like a real loaded gun they would have to the West.

But I also think that there is a general consensus that they're in their system, that their relationship would be different than the past.

The other thing, just this is very important.

The underappreciated element like this is like if I was ever going to write a book about Donald Trump's foreign policy.

And, by the way, he hates people write books, not like books like that, but insider books where you take trusted information and put it into a book.

Doesn't like that.

But what I would, what I would say is he's so nonconventional in the way that he does everything, but certainly the way that he does foreign policy, that things that were previously unimaginable are actually on the table.

So when Donald Trump says to the Iranians we want you to be a successful country if you give us what we need on nuclear weapons.

We'll take the sanctions off your country and allow you to prosper.

That would have been unthinkable 10 years ago in any Democrat or Republican administration.

But it's thinkable because Donald Trump is just like.

No, the way things worked in the past are dumb.

We're going to do something new.

And that's that's what he's putting on the table.

We'll see if they meet us.

But right now, I feel pretty good about it.

The other term I'd never heard before is Strait of Hormuz.

Yes.

I've learned so much about the bloody Strait of Hormuz.

Did you have any idea that the Iranians would cut off the Strait of Hormuz?

You did know that going into it.

It was a major – you see these media reports like the Trump team was caught off guard.

What would happen in the Strait of Hormuz was a main fixture of the conversation that we were having about whether to do this, how to do this.

So it was certainly a variable.

Now, you can never predict with 100 percent certainty what people are going to do.

But the basic bias that we had going into it is that they would try to cut off the straight.

They would try to jack up energy prices.

They thought and I think this is true.

They thought that they could cut off the straights for us but actually keep the straits open for themselves.

That ended up not being true when we imposed the blockade.

But fundamentally, we knew some version of what would happen.

But we also went into it saying, if they do this, fundamentally, it's a short-term thing.

So like Brent crude is sort of the main crude oil index, right?

I think the highest it got was $126 per barrel.

Right now, sitting here, it's around $82 a barrel.

It's fallen off a cliff because there's a broad recognition that yeah, it was a short-term shock, but not a short-term shock that's going to permanently alter the world energy economy.

It's quite a powerful weapon they have in their arsenal just to take, shudder the world's economy and piss off your people at home at the gas pump.

It's quite like it's quite a...

Well, geography really matters in warfare, it turns out.

And yes, they have great proximity to the Strait of Hormuz.

But again, if you just go back two weeks ago, one of the things that's interesting really underreported but I think your listeners will obviously be interested in is

If you look at the amount of oil that we were getting out of the Strait of Hormuz.

We I mean the United States, the Gulf Coast Coalition, broadly speaking, the Arabs in the Gulf right

You look at it, what it was, call it April 1st, it was like close to zero.

You go to May 30th, early June, it was many, many million barrels of oil a day.

Now, not enough to eliminate the shock, to be clear, but we were seeing significant increases in oil traffic.

And again, I think that's one of the reasons why we're having a good negotiation with the Iranians is they recognized?

Yes, they have this leverage point, but maybe not forever.

And it's one of those cards you can play, but you can't necessarily play it week after week after week.

It degrades in power.

So I take your point.

Yeah, they have this geographical thing going on.

But I think that geographical leverage point was weakening over time.

And it's why we are where we are, I think, with a very good deal.

Knock on wood.

We have to see it to completion.

Because if you're them, you go well.

All I've got to do is wait two years, because the president is going to be, you know, removed from office.

In two years time.

He's going to be at the end of his term.

So if they could just wait it out for two years, they can hope that new political leader that comes in might be more charitable with them.

Yeah, but if Donald Trump has two and a half years left in office, I think the Iranians recognize they did not have two and a half years to wait things out.

One, as we got more and more oil out of the Strait, their leverage point decreased.

But in some ways, more importantly, like, look...

You look at Persian culture, you look at the history of Iran.

This is one of the proudest and oldest civilizations anywhere in the world.

They don't want to be like a Libya style rump state.

They want to have a much brighter future.

Like, I think that that's actually true.

Now, there's a question about how to get there.

And obviously, there's a lot of animosity between the two sides.

But I do think something has fundamentally changed in the way that regime sees the world.

The deal that you have on the table.

Yes.

Now, okay, excuse me if I'm skeptical.

But I said to you before we started recording, I watch everything.

Yes.

So I've watched every... If you do an interview, Hegseth does one.

If the president does one...

I see it.

I see the whole thing.

I don't know why, but I'm very, very interested in US politics because it does impact the whole world.

And as I've watched these interviews, there's been lots of false deals.

You flew out there. to Pakistan and you flew right back.

The deal wasn't done.

I think I saw a report the other day that said the president has said roughly 30 times that there's a deal done or that there's a deal on the table.

Usually on a Sunday, then it's not.

Then we go back into this negotiation thing.

So I'm like, I don't have any trust anymore for a deal getting done.

Well, this one's real, so...

Okay, good.

People can always change their minds, but this one is real.

For sure.

So what does that mean?

Does it mean that there's a contract that has been sent with terms on it and they've provisionally, like a term sheet, said we agree?

Yes.

That's exactly what's happened.

Okay, so they've agreed to a term sheet.

Yes.

And then, as is the case in business and investing, that becomes more of a formalized contract.

Correct.

And then that's signed.

That's right.

So what is in the term sheet?

Well, a few things.

So the first is that the Straits of Hormuz opens effectively immediately and the blockade is lifted effectively immediately.

Okay.

Now when I say effectively that's doing a little bit of work there, because you know, part of what's going on is there's a different risk tolerance for different shippers in the Gulf.

So some again.

Like I said earlier, some of these guys are already shipping a lot of oil through the Straits of Hormuz right now, even though the Iranians are threatening to shoot at them.

But what this means is that over time, we're going to demine the Strait of Hormuz.

The Iranians are going to stop shooting.

We're going to lift our naval blockade.

And you're going to see, I think, a pretty quick resumption of full flow of traffic in the Strait of Hormuz.

That's number one most important thing.

And there's mines in there.

There's mines in there.

There are mines in there.

But it's a very big waterway.

There's a lot of traffic moving right now.

So we know where the mines are.

They're not everywhere.

And, you know, again, the ships are able to move.

The biggest obstacle and impediment to ships moving right now is actually not the mines themselves.

It's the Iranians who are shooting drones and missiles on the other side.

Now I say that.

We have seen a precipitous decline since we signed this agreement.

We've seen a precipitous decline and even that happening.

So you're already, again, seeing the fruits of this negotiation that we have.

Number two is it contemplates the Iranians giving up their highly enriched stockpile of material, committing to a long-term inspections regime on their nuclear program and, in exchange, having a totally different economic relationship with the United States of America.

So there's a stack of sanctions that the U.S. has on Iran that is like 60 pages long.

That is incredibly destructive to the Iranian economy by design, right?

The deal is you're not going to behave like a normal country.

We're not going to engage in normal trade transactions with you.

What this agreement provides is that the Iranians take significant steps to behave like a normal country.

They're going to get significant reintegration into the world economy.

And I think that is in some ways the most profound thing.

And what the United States gets out of.

That is the long-term guarantee that they never become a nuclear power.

I think people always sort of – it's hard to appreciate how temporal this is.

The Iranian nuclear program has been completely destroyed like it doesn't exist right now.

But over time, you can try to rebuild it.

And so what we're trying to say is we don't want you to rebuild this program.

If you make real commitments and verifiable commitments that you're not going to, then you're in a lot of economic benefits on the side.

You dropped those big bunker buster bombs.

Correct.

I was very fascinated by that whole series of military operations.

And the nuclear material is now buried pretty deep underground, from what I understand.

With this deal, do you get to go and get it?

Do they hand it over to you?

What happens?

So the way the deal is structured is that the Iranians, the Americans and the International Atomic Energy Agency will actually work together to go get the material and destroy it.

That's the basic idea. is that we're all going to work together.

Again, the agreement contemplates a new era in relationship.

So the idea is that we're all going to try to work together, destroy this material.

And again, if that happens, the Iranians are going to have a totally different economic relationship with the West.

And if it doesn't happen, then the United States is no worse off.

And you get to check that they're not just going to a different mountain and building new nuclear weapons.

That's where the verification element comes in.

But we have a very good sense.

You know, you probably guess why we have a very good sense of what's going on in the country of Iran.

We could probably keep that material just permanently buried.

But we want to do that.

We actually want to solve the problem and we want the Iranians to have a different relationship with us.

And that's what we're trying to do.

And the specifics of you being able to go and check that they're not just building new nuclear weapons.

It sounds to me like the specifics haven't been defined yet, like how those checks take place.

Well yeah, like you said, it's a term sheet where we've got broad agreement on principles and how we're going to approach the negotiation.

But there are a lot of details that we've got to figure out from here.

So I've got Strait of Hormuz opens nuclear inspections, but also a coalition to remove the nuclear waste.

Correct.

From that, they get the opportunity to participate in the economy and sanctions will be lifted.

Yep.

Is there anything that's in that term sheet that's not included there?

I mean, there are other little details and things like that.

Obviously, the permanent cessation of hostilities.

We're trying to bring in a regional era of peace here.

But that's pretty much the main thing.

And Israel, there was some interesting words exchanged yesterday.

Again, I watch everything.

So I saw that the Fox reporter had called Trump, I think yesterday, because Netanyahu had started firing some bombs.

And he had some select words, kind of like your grandmother's words.

Yes, indeed.

Apparently he said, Trump said he'd phoned Netanyahu and told him he had no fucking judgment.

Why did Bibi have to do a fucking attack?

I'm so pissed off.

An hour before we were supposed to sign the deal, Trump called Netanyahu a very difficult guy.

He should be very thankful for us for doing this, because if Iran had a nuclear weapon, Israel wouldn't be around for two hours.

Lots of cussing at Netanyahu and what he had done.

I've heard you actually say that you think Israel and the United States have two different objectives as it relates to.

I don't want to mischaracterize your words.

Well, I would say is that we're different countries with different interests.

I think the United States sometimes people characterize.

You know Israel is a good partner to the United States.

That is true.

But sometimes people mischaracterize it and say that Israel and the United States are fundamentally always aligned.

It's just not true.

We're different countries.

We have different needs.

We have different geographies.

Do you trust them?

You know, I don't trust anybody.

When it comes to international affairs and diplomacy, do I think that they're very capable?

Absolutely.

Do I think that, again, when we have shared interests, we work together very well?

Absolutely.

But I don't trust anyone.

And I think that we just have to continually be laser focused on what our interests are.

And what the president said about Bibi is sometimes.

You know we are the world's superpower and obviously we're Israel's most important ally anywhere in the world.

And sometimes to ensure that we are able to accomplish our objectives.

The president has to have a very frank conversation with the prime minister of Israel.

Sometimes he does that.

Sometimes everything works smoothly.

Sometimes it doesn't.

It's just the nature, like any relationship, right?

Any relationship is going to have moments where you have to be more direct.

Sometimes you're working together and sometimes there's a little bit more conflict.

The world's opinion and thoughts about the US-Israel relationship has never been more widely discussed.

I agree.

And I almost don't know why, but it seems to be the case that over the last I'd say, six to 12 months, people are really now questioning what is this relationship and who is the dominant partner in the relationship.

For someone just in super simple terms, because I don't really know a lot about this particular point what is the relationship and where did it come from?

Well, you know, I'm hardly an expert in U.S.-Israeli relations, right?

But let me just say they're obviously in some ways the only democracy in the Middle East, okay?

Yeah. very advanced economy, very high skilled people, technological ingenuity.

I mean, it's a country of 9 million people.

They generate a lot of the world's inventions just from 9 million people.

It's a very impressive country economically.

They're also probably better at intelligence collection than any country in the world.

So there again and again, because they're an advanced economy, because you know they're people, generally speaking, want to live in peace and harmony, just want to go to work and raise their kids.

There are a lot of shared interests, a lot of shared objectives.

And I think that you know, over time especially, for example, when one of our biggest problems, going back to the early 2000s, was the rise of Islamic terrorism.

Islamic radical terrorism.

I should say there was a sort of broad recognition that there's a lot for us to work on.

But again, even if you go back to then, the early 2000s, Very large alignment between Israeli interests and American interests.

But even in like the early 2000s, the Israelis were much more worried about Iran than the United States was.

Right.

We were much more worried about Al Qaeda, like a different branch of Islamic terrorism.

So even when we've been very aligned, we're just different countries that have different objectives.

And, you know.

I will say, having seen the president of the United States operate, I feel quite confident that you know they are the junior partner.

We're the senior partner.

We're the world's superpower.

That's the way that it works.

But, you know, again, sometimes it's like with the UK.

I would say the UK is our closest ally, our oldest ally.

I'm not just saying that because you're a Brit.

Do you trust the UK?

Again, I don't really trust anybody.

But do I like a lot of Brits?

Absolutely.

Do I have, I mean, incredible fondness for the United Kingdom as a country and a culture?

Absolutely.

And I really like a lot of the people, even the Labour government, even though they're politically misaligned with me and the rest of the Trump administration.

But, you know, like we have disagreements from time to time.

So we work really well together.

And sometimes we have misaligned interests and we have to pursue our interests in the best way we can.

And please do tell me, what does Netanyahu want?

Because I sit here with these experts and they say they want to overtake the whole of the Middle East.

They want to run the Middle East.

What does he want?

I don't know.

You don't know?

Well, I mean, I can't get inside somebody's head.

Have you asked them what they want?

Well, I think that in this particular operation again, where interests were aligned is we wanted Iranian conventional military power to be much weaker, to be decimated.

The Israelis shared that objective.

Do I think that there are maybe I don't know if Bibi thinks this, but do I think there are people within Israeli society who would like to turn Iran into Libya, basically a failed state with 90 million people?

Probably.

But I don't know that Bibi wants that.

I've actually never had that conversation with it would be an interesting conversation to have.

I'll tell you right now.

Is Iran turning into a Persian Libya good for the United States of America?

Absolutely not.

And that's one of the reasons why the president has set us on this course of working on our interests, which is the elimination of the nuclear threat and a change dynamic with the Iranians, which is very much on the table.

You run for Senate.

Yeah.

And you're successful.

And this is really from what I can see from my research where you and Trump first made friends, I should say

Before then, you weren't friends.

No, that's right.

You were quite critical of Donald Trump before then.

And you've been probably asked this a million times, but I actually didn't know this until literally today.

I read the piece you'd written in The Atlantic where you criticized him for taking advantage of the struggling working class.

What Trump offers this is your quote is an easy escape from pain.

To every complex problem, he promises a simple solution.

He can bring jobs back simply by punishing offshore companies into submission.

As he told a New Hampshire crowd, folks are too similar with the opioid Scrooge.

He can cure the addiction epidemic by building a Mexican wall and keeping the cartels out.

He will spare the United States from humiliation and military defeat with indiscriminate bombing.

It doesn't matter that no credible military leader has endorsed his plan.

He never offers detail for those plans to work because Trump is cultural heroin.

He makes some people feel better, but he cannot fix all that ails them.

And one day they'll realize it.

Very tough words against Trump.

A long time ago.

2016 and 10 years ago.

What changed?

Well, let me pick up.

First of all, I think you always have to be able to acknowledge when you're right and when you're wrong.

And there's a lot I was right about in 2016, but just pick up on something.

Can you read the line for me again where I talk about?

Is it?

No credible military leader has endorsed these plans.

Yeah, it says, it doesn't matter that no credible military leader has endorsed his plan.

Okay.

So what I would say is I wrote that.

I believed it when I wrote it.

And reading it now, I'm almost embarrassed that I wrote it because it was so obviously absurd.

In fact, the fact that Donald Trump was misaligned with the military experts and the military leadership of 2016 was a good thing, not a bad thing.

Think about those military leaders.

I mean, I have a lot of respect for the troops, the people who serve, the people who put on a uniform.

You can make a very credible argument that, from the early 90s until you know at least 2016, America hadn't won a war in 30 years.

Like, there's a reason why Donald Trump mistrusted the military leadership.

And he was right.

And so much of what I think the president represented at the time was a recognition that American institutions had become sclerotic and broken.

And he was a weapon to break down those institutions.

Your assessment of him is similar to the democratic assessment of him.

Your assessment of him back in 2016 is similar to the democratic assessment of him.

There was a private message between you and a roommate where you said he was either a cynical asshole or America's Hitler.

How do you go from that position to vice president of the same person?

What is that journey?

A crazy journey, man.

But again, I mean it's you have to ask yourself.

First of all, I thought Donald Trump would be a failed president if he got elected.

He was not.

I thought that America's institutions were fundamentally functioning.

They were not.

I thought that the military leaders who told us this about a war or the scientific experts who told us this other thing about a pandemic, were fundamentally maybe not always right, but fundamentally wise people who were mostly right.

I was wrong.

What have you observed behind the scenes that that J.D., didn't see.

So in operation, when you see him making decisions... Yeah, so, I mean...

I want to caveat this with saying that you know I didn't know him well by the time.

You know, I voted for him in 2020.

Obviously you know very, very involved in the 2024 campaign well before I was ever his vice presidential nominee.

I had that change based purely on what I saw from the outside.

It's not like I had insider knowledge about Donald Trump and that's what caused me to change.

Now what I will say is that, having the insider knowledge, one thing that that really mistakes is, or gets wrong that piece in the Atlantic, that's when that, that's where that piece was published is that Donald Trump is much different as a human being than the media makes him out to be.

He's very warm.

He's a very like loving person to his kids, to his grandkids.

He's incredibly generous.

Like, if you see Donald Trump uh, you know in the oval office, it's like he has to give you a gift.

Like he has to, whether it's, you know, a water bottle or a MAGA hat or a coin or a pin.

Like he.

He just he's one of these people who he really likes to.

He really likes making other people happy.

I had no understanding of that from him from the outside.

What I would see is, you know, clips of him arguing with a journalist.

And that was it.

And that gives you a very, very one dimensional view of a person.

So, yeah, I definitely from the inside have seen a much, much more multidimensional figure.

The thing I say about about Donald Trump is I remember this in 2016.

And in hindsight, it's just so, so dumb.

People would say that he was dumb or that he wasn't very smart.

He's super smart.

Like, he reads a lot.

He understands people at an instinctual level better than anybody that I've ever known.

But...

He is a very, very – like, from a pure IQ perspective, he's a very smart person.

And it's interesting that so many people – like you know, if you give Donald Trump an IQ test with the other –

45, 46 presidents that the United States has had, I guarantee he'd be either near the top or at the top.

And the entire American media in 2016 had convinced me, at least, that he was not a smart person.

And by 2022, he's endorsed you.

Correct.

And you win your race in the US Senate.

Correct.

And then, sometime after then, at some point, you're going to get introduced to him and he's going to ask you to be the vice president of the United States.

Yeah.

Bring me, if I was a fly on the wall, was that a phone call or was it a meeting?

Well, there have been meetings before that.

Just generally at that point, I was involved in his reelection campaign.

I was one of the first, maybe the very first senators to endorse him in 2023.

I believe is actually when I endorsed him very early on in 2023.

When again, I thought he would win.

But the conventional wisdom was that he would not win even the Republican nomination, that his political career was over.

So I endorsed him very early.

He and I became quite close over that period.

We talked a lot about issues.

He gave me some advice on various bills that I was working on in the Senate.

We just became pretty close.

He and I worked very closely together.

There was this train derailment in East Palestine, Ohio, and he and I became quite close over that.

So we just sort of developed a relationship.

We were friendly and then we were closer and then he was sort of you know, a person that I really look to in politics.

And then the 2024 campaign really started heating up and there were all these rumors about possibly me being his running mate.

And you know, he and I didn't ever have that conversation like about being his running mate until like a day or two before he picked me.

And that was an in-person conversation.

It was actually the morning he was shot in person.

He goes to that rally in Pennsylvania.

He gets shot.

Obviously, he's OK.

Thank God.

And then two days later, he asked me to be the nominee.

So where were you when he asked you?

I had just landed in Milwaukee for the RNC convention.

There's like a deadline to it, because the way the convention works is you have to be formally nominated by the delegates on Monday at like 3 or 4 o'clock.

And it was –

11 o'clock.

I had just arrived in Milwaukee.

I had no idea what was going on.

And I thought I had a good chance, but I wasn't sure.

And he called me.

I didn't answer the phone.

I think that it was like.

It was just.

It was one of those things where I was getting so many phone calls and the call went straight to voicemail, like it never rang.

And so I get a text message from a friend of mine who's now the White House chief of staff.

Said you just missed a very important phone call.

I called him back.

I said, what's up, Mr. President?

He said, J.D., you just missed a very important phone call.

I'm going to have to pick somebody else up. but then he asked me and the rest is history, man.

For the last couple of years, I've been working on something that I realized every podcaster listening to this, but actually probably every creator listening to this, might just need.

Podcasting is difficult for many reasons.

And one of them is that these hosting platforms don't give you much information.

And also because they're so fragmented.

You kind of have to go through every single platform, uploading it to YouTube and then taking the same big old video file and uploading it to Spotify's platform.

It takes huge amounts of time and that friction means most of us don't do it.

That is the problem we set out to solve.

And so we built something called Flightcast, which you can find at flightcast.com.

And today, Flightcast is also one of our show sponsors.

And some of the world's biggest podcasters are now using our platform to run their shows.

Because it gives you an edge.

It saves you time.

It gives you analytics most people won't typically get, allows you to use ai to be more informed on your show, and it has growth tools that other hosting platforms don't have.

So podcasters that are using flightcast have this unfair advantage.

So go to flightcastcom.

Slash doac now.

Did you know at that time what you were signing up for?

No, I had no idea.

No idea.

So why did you want to do it?

And, you know, people say I represent my country, but why... It's a lot.

It's a big cost to your family.

When I arrived here today, I saw, I don't know, it felt like 50 men with guns.

Probably.

Yeah.

They'd scoped out the whole building.

They'd been searching this building, I think, for a couple of days.

And I thought, wow, like...

How does...

How does the vice president live life with his family when you have this going everywhere with you?

Did you know what you were signing up for?

No, no, I didn't.

I mean you know you sign up because you want to make a difference and because you know I was already a senator.

So I'm already in the politics business.

I might as well try to serve at the highest level possible.

You know, you think you could help, right?

Part of being the VP is you help on the campaign trail.

You know six months really, the part of the campaign that is the most intense is the part where you're sort of riding a side saddle with the presidential nominee.

It's just like all these things for white people get into politics in the first place.

No, I mean, look, I'm not a whiner and I would never complain about this.

But if I was a whiner, the one thing I would say is it was very hard on the kids, in particular our oldest son.

And I just had no idea what I was getting myself into.

I mean, okay, so the president, he and I had this brief phone conversation.

You know, my kid is talking to me about Pokemon cards at the hotel in Milwaukee.

We're still like unpacking our suitcase.

And it's like, OK, I'm now the VP nominee.

I have to get on my suit.

I have to get prepared to be nominated like three or four hours later.

And all these thoughts are swirling through my head.

Knock at the door and it's the Secret Service.

And it's like, all right, you're under our protection now.

We have to move your entire family to the president's hotel so that you're in the same protective bubble.

And all of a sudden, I just realized my life is totally different now.

It'll never be the same.

I was OK with that.

You know, like you sort of you just get used to it.

I'm a grown man.

But it was very hard on my oldest boy, who's nine years old now.

He made a comment, didn't he? oh yeah, he hated it.

He hated the attention.

He hated how people treated him differently.

It was like one of these things where you know he would go to a school and people would treat him like he was special and he just wanted to be a normal kid.

And I felt guilty.

I felt really guilty about that.

And I felt this sort of sense like, oh my God, I've conscripted this kid into this life.

I had no idea what I was signing him up for.

He didn't sign up for it.

I signed him up for it.

And that was pretty tough.

Sometimes I feel like I've ruined his life without even asking him.

You wrote that in your new book, page 198.

Yes.

In reference to your seven-year-old son.

Sometimes I feel like I've ruined his life without even asking him.

Yeah.

That's how I felt.

I mean, I think that I've gained certainly some perspective about it.

One of the things we've been quite good at is just finding communities where he's more isolated from all the attention and all the pressures of it.

We have a very, very good school community for him, a Christian school that he goes to and he loves.

There's also, by the way, a flip side is kids, as you may know.

You realize how much nature matters, more than nurture.

You know, our oldest boy is an introvert.

Our six year old is a little bit more like me.

He's a bit of an extrovert.

He loves it.

And so you kind of have to balance the way that it affects the kids.

But, you know, I don't feel like I've ruined my nine year old's life anymore.

But I certainly at that time, I felt extremely guilty about what I had signed him up for.

And in your new book Communion, you say Dad.

You quote him and say that he said Dad, I just want everyone to go back to treating us like they used to.

Yes, that's right.

Are these things hard to hear?

Oh, of course, man.

Of course.

I mean, you know, do you have kids?

Not yet, but I'm trying.

Yeah, good for you.

You know, my prayers for that endeavor.

Thank you.

I think...

Your kids have an emotional effect on you that is just totally profound and revelatory.

And yeah man, when your son tells you that he wants something that you can no longer provide him, that's a very, very tough thing.

Now, the flip side of it is.

And you can say this is a rationalization, but I think it's true.

The flip side is there are a lot of blessings that come along with this life.

And, you know, I've talked to him a lot about this.

I actually, you know, I write this in the book that Charlie Kirk was probably the person who was most influential in helping me think through this conversation is.

You know, Don't try to pretend that it's not a sacrifice to him.

Like you know, don't pretend that you haven't signed him up for something that has changed his life.

You have.

But I try to talk to him about.

Well, there are benefits to you've gotten to see the world and got to see the country in a way that no kid has ever gotten to see it.

And we get to live in this cool house.

I live in the Naval Observatory here in Washington, DC.

We would not get to do that if I was not the vice president.

So what I've learned to do with him is not to minimize the negative, but to try to contextualize it, but also to try to emphasize the positive.

And it's funny.

I asked him this probably about a year ago.

I said, are you still unhappy that I became the vice president?

This is probably four or five months into it.

He said, absolutely.

I asked him that question recently, and he said, actually, it's pretty good.

So kids adjust.

You know, lives change.

You figure out a routine for the kids.

But I also think that, you know, that that guilt motivated certain conduct.

Would we have built the life that we have around them were it not for this recognition that we had caused this change and this disruption?

No.

So you take the good with the bad.

You accept that you've caused some problems, but you also accept that you can make things better.

Lovely photo here.

If your wife is, I love this photo.

She looks beautiful.

This is actually the day, or at least the weekend, that I met her mom.

This is at the High Line in Brooklyn.

Have you ever been to the High Line?

Not in Brooklyn, in South Manhattan.

Oh, the High Line, yeah.

Yeah, the High Line Park.

It basically travels a long way up South Manhattan.

There's this little observation deck.

We're sitting there taking a photo.

And that first summer we were together, we started dating in March of 2011.

And so I was doing a research assistant thing in New Haven, Connecticut, about an hour and a half train ride.

She was in New York City.

And you know, it was in some ways like a metaphor for our relationship, because I found New York just this totally intimidating place.

I didn't know how to ride the subway.

I didn't even know how to like buy a subway card to get on the subway.

But I was just because I was in love with her.

I went down there every chance I could get.

We spent every moment.

When you're newly in love with somebody, it's just like an obsession.

And we sort of explored New York City together as this young couple this summer.

And that was the day that I met her mom.

And I passed the test because here I am.

What surprised her most about you becoming the vice president?

What didn't she expect?

She doesn't get surprised by much.

That's actually a very, very hard question.

I do think the Secret Service protection surprised her too, the way that it changes your life.

I'd like to give you an example.

So, you know, we went to Rome for the Pope's inaugural mass, the new Pope, the American Pope.

And like my favorite thing to do in the world, like if you said I'll give you two hours, you can do whatever you want.

What I would do is I would go to some place, whether in the country or in a big city, and I would just take a walk with Usha.

Like, that is my ultimate way to, like, vacation or relax.

And you know, we tried to take a walk in Rome and it was, like you know, SEAL Team 6 had descended upon Rome.

They were shutting down every traffic intersection.

There's a helicopter flying overhead.

And...

Just I think that's surprising to her how much the security protocols have changed, just the way that we do things like take a walk together.

Can you make that decision still yourself?

Could you say to all these Secret Service people there's none okay, I can't see any Secret Service at the moment.

But I know they're behind that curtain.

They're all behind the curtain.

Yeah, don't try anything.

Yeah, they're outside, they're everywhere.

They're probably on the roof.

But can you just, are you the one that still gets to make the call of what you wanted to do?

So could you say, listen, I want to walk down the street to Walmart.

There are actually like statutory prohibitions, like they have legal obligations in order to protect me.

They are, I will say, great people, amazing people.

And we found accommodation like we found a way of taking a walk without disrupting everybody.

Right.

But it's taken a little bit of work and a little bit of practice.

And the biggest change is just, again, it's not that you can't take a walk.

It's that the basic protocol, the thing that they've gotten used to, is much different and more misaligned with the way that we want to live our lives.

So we figured it out.

Like we've gotten things to a good place.

But in the first instance, man, it was crazy.

I just couldn't imagine.

It was actually getting here today.

Like you hear about Secret Service, but when you, as someone like me, I was here yesterday.

So making my way into this building today, which is like our studio.

I couldn't believe it.

I was being tapped down, pocket checked.

People were handing me stuff, keep this on.

And I went downstairs to the toilet in the basement.

There was a guy down there with a gun.

I was like, there's a guy outside my door with a gun.

I was like, wow.

You've never been safer than you are right now.

Yeah.

You've written this new book called Communion.

Yeah.

Which is about, I mean, the subtitle is Finding My Way Back to Faith.

Back to faith.

Yeah, that's right.

So for your 30s, you became atheist?

In your late 20s?

Yeah, I would say my 20s.

Yeah, in my early 20s.

So I was raised in an evangelical household.

Very conservative, you know, very evangelical Christianity.

My grandmother was one of these people.

You know she read the Bible five, six times a day.

She prayed five, six times a day.

Was a woman.

You know.

Mamaw was devoutly religious but we were what you would call unchurched.

So I would go to church with my dad.

I would occasionally go to church with my mom, Occasionally with my mamaw.

But, you know, our religion was very much experienced at home.

It was you would watch televangelists on TV.

You'd watch Billy Graham revival things on TV.

But we didn't go to church that much.

And so I got to a point in my life where I just felt like my faith wasn't speaking to me anymore.

It didn't seem to have particular relevance to my life.

There was a certain new atheist element to it, where I assumed that I knew more than these bumpkins that had raised me and her faith is all superstition.

I'm rational, and I'm a college-educated kid, and I know things that other people don't.

So there's a certain intellectual arrogance that was built into it.

But sort of all these things... kind of swam together.

But fundamentally I think that, with all love and affection of my grandmother, I think the thing about my faith that just never took root is that I never saw why it actually mattered that much.

It was just a thing.

It was in the background.

It was something we believed.

I mean, I really did believe this stuff when I was a teenager. but it didn't really matter.

And so when that boy collided with reality and collided with a lot of things that were going on in the world, I just was not properly prepared to actually integrate my faith into this new world.

When did you realize that it mattered?

Well, so, okay, so I become an atheist.

I'm sort of one of these like angry atheists.

You know where I'll like argue with people who say that they're religious and I pretend that I'm smarter than everybody else.

And it was, like, very embarrassing in hindsight.

But, you know, I go back and so – just a flaw that I have.

All of us have many flaws, many virtues, but a flaw that I have is I just I wanted to rise above everything.

Now, where it came from a good place is I wanted stability.

I wanted a decent income.

I wanted to provide my kids that stability that I didn't have.

But where it was a very bad thing is I cared way too much about what credentials I had.

Where did I go to school?

How much money that I made?

And so this sort of new atheism actually was like the perfect philosophy for the creative kid who just wanted to get ahead.

I wanted to make as much money.

I wanted to have the most prestigious profession.

I was super ambitious for ambition's sake.

And so I had won every competition that life had put before me.

I'm at this point in my late 20s.

I've got a beautiful girlfriend.

Things are going pretty well.

I'm at Yale Law School, the top law school in the United States of America, very prestigious.

Everybody thought I was very smart because I went to Yale Law School and I cared about that back then.

I don't care about it now.

And I sort of realized I'm actually not like a happy person.

I'm not a good person.

I care about where I went to law school way more than whether I'm good to this girl.

Right.

I mean, I really was like madly in love with her.

But.

Was I like a particularly good boyfriend?

No, I had learned from my youth to be chaotic and I'd threatened to break up with her every other month.

And, you know, if we had an argument, I just like disappear for a couple of days.

And I was just like, not, I sort of realized, okay, there's something missing here.

There's something that all of this obsession with achievement and being smarter than everybody else and being rational it has not actually made me a good person.

And I sort of looked around and said, well, who are the people that I like actually want to be like?

Who are the people that I most admire in the world?

And I slowly realized that the ones who were the most virtuous, the ones who were the best at the things that actually mattered, they were Christians.

And their faith motivated not an obsession with getting ahead, but an obsession with treating people well or an obsession with developing the strength of character that mattered so that you could withstand you know very tough circumstances.

And I started to think to myself, okay, wait a second.

There's like these rays of sunshine from Christians that I knew in my life, from Christian ideas that sort of were in the background of my own intellectual curiosity.

And if there are all of these rays of sunshine where Christianity seems to be warmer and truer than something else, maybe the rest of it actually has something to be said for it too.

And that kind of led me down a pathway of thinking about my faith in a way that I never had when I was a teenager.

I never had to when I was a teenager.

And it finally just hit me like, there is something deeply profound about this.

And at first it was an intellectual thing, right?

But over time it became a more emotional and more practice thing.

And eventually I got baptized.

I'd never been baptized as a kid.

And you know, even though my wife is not Christian, I force, force her to take take, take our three kids and husband to church every single week.

And she's remarkably patient about it.

But it's it's it's one of these things where it really did transform me, but in a slower way.

Atheism is a form of religion in a way, isn't it?

Exactly.

It has the same level of sort of certainty.

And that's why I introduced myself to you as an agnostic, because it feels a little bit arrogant to say that I know.

Yeah, yeah, no, that's interesting.

I'm going to take a little bit of a hard turn, which is AI.

AI is going to cause a lot of job disruption.

It's a big topic of conversation for my audience, but also as an entrepreneur and investor.

We're talking a lot at the moment about the impact of AI.

When you look at the words of the big AI CEOs over time.

One thing I find fascinating is if you look at Sam Altman's words about the impact AI is going to have.

It's very dystopian.

You look at Elon, very, very dystopian.

And right now, I think the only thing that's up there with being as unpopular as AI is ice in the US.

I saw this graph the other day in terms of how unpopular it is.

Eric Schmidt, who I know you know, because he was an investor in your company, I believe.

The other day, when he was doing that commencement speech in front of the college students, he was booed every time he said the word.

That's right.

Are you scared about the potential economic impact and unemployment impact of artificial intelligence at this moment in time?

So I'd say I'm less scared about that than I am about other things.

Okay.

Okay, so... historical analogies are always fraught.

And, by the way, I think, the AI companies themselves, the CEOs.

There's a certain incentive to be super dystopian, because it's like a form of viral marketing.

That if people are really scared of your product, that must mean that it really works.

And if they're not scared of your product, maybe it actually doesn't work that well.

So I think there's something weird.

There's something synergistic about the most pessimistic predictions about AI and some of the people who are making them.

But, like, set that to the side because I do have some real concerns.

But on the job displacement thing, okay, so...

Let me back up for a second because I bring a certain bias to this.

So when I was – again, this is an almost religious idea that I developed in the early 2010s.

That, I think, is just preposterous.

Now,

And that religious idea was that there was like this inevitable march of economics from agricultural to industrial to service-based.

Right.

And the reason that all of my friends and family were losing their jobs was because that was just an inevitable economic trend.

That advanced economies.

They deindustrialized.

Okay.

And there was even this argument at the time that the reason why manufacturing employment was going down the United States was because of automation, because of technology.

That it had nothing to do with outsourcing or with immigration, but it was purely because of technology had replaced all these workers with robots.

I think that story is totally false.

Now, the robots that exist in manufacturing, did they make people more productive?

Absolutely.

Did they cause a change in what a manufacturing line worker was doing in say 2005 versus 1955?

Absolutely.

So the change is there, Thank you so much for having me.

You ship the job to another country or you have somebody else.

Take the job of somebody who currently has it.

So what do I think is actually going on with AI?

If you go back to the Industrial Revolution, the last significant major disruption in the labor market, you actually had way more people working at the end of the Industrial Revolution than you did beforehand.

Again, some of the jobs were different.

There was some job disruption.

But when I look at AI...

I don't see mass unemployment as the most likely consequence.

I think people will become more productive.

I think some people's jobs will change.

Some people will lose their jobs.

But I just don't buy this idea.

And I haven't seen any evidence in the data that's going to lead to mass unemployment.

Let me tell you what does worry me.

Again, historical analogies are always fraught.

You go back to the Industrial Revolution.

Was mass joblessness, the main consequence of the shift from an agricultural to an industrial economy.

No.

But what did happen?

Rich people got way richer.

And that led to, in Europe, fascism and communism.

In fact, your country and my country are pretty much the only two countries that successfully avoided either a fascist or communist revolution in response to the Industrial Revolution.

That's, by the way, one of the real interesting things about Christianity is –

The seminal text about how capital and labor could work together, about how you could have social harmony.

Compared to Marx, who was sort of saying there was an inevitable social division, was Pope Leo XIII, who wrote in his famous encyclical that the way to preserve harmony between the social classes was to ensure that the workers could bargain.

This is where sort of the idea of collective bargaining had a Christian underpinning.

And to make sure that the capitalists weren't able to take advantage of the workers, they had to sort of respect them.

And that model of social harmony, I think, is something we're either going to follow, that Christian concept of social harmony in the age of AI, or we're going to wake up and we're going to realize that rich people have gotten way richer.

The average American, the average Brit, the average Western society member has stagnated and people really hate relative poverty.

You can give people iPhones and you can give the people the creature comforts of a 21st century economy.

But if you make rich people way richer, you're going to have significant problems.

And so I think that is one of the consequences that I see from AI.

The one other just because you asked about it.

The other thing I really worry about with AI is surveillance.

AI is – a friend of mine once said that AI is fundamentally a communist technology in that it allows – governments and corporations to surveil people in very profound and different ways.

And that scares me a lot.

Like, I don't want a social credit system that's powered by AI.

I don't want you to not be able to buy a beer because some tech CEO has given you a score based on an artificial intelligence algorithm that nobody actually understands.

That scares me too.

I don't think we're going to have mass unemployment.

We might have mass inequality.

That's its own problem.

It's a different problem though.

According to the current 2026 Federal Reserve and Census Bureau data, financial inequality in the United States has reached its highest level in nearly four decades.

And obviously we've seen this headline this week of the US's first trillionaire.

Which again has been talked about everywhere around the world in this last part of this debate.

You think about the explosion we're seeing in robotics and Elon Musk's pay packet rewarding him for getting a million humanoid robots out there at a certain timeline?

And Elon himself saying there'll be a billion humanoid robots at some point.

There'll be more humanoid robots than humans.

It appears to me that there will be some kind of job disruption.

Obviously, there's new jobs created, which are hard to forecast.

Yeah.

And you've got these big frontier model companies like OpenAI and Tropic that are going to be benefactors of this evolution.

Correct.

Wealth is presumably going to accrue to these large, large corporations.

The matters, the anthropics, the open areas.

How would you think about, we already have crazy, crazy inequality.

How do you think about redistributing that wealth?

Bernie Sanders is saying people need to own 50% of these AI companies.

Which the president, by the way, likes that idea too.

He likes it.

He likes that idea.

I don't know that he would say 50%, but he does like that idea.

So there's a concept in the social welfare literature of redistribution versus predistribution.

The idea of pre-distribution is that you give workers, you give people, normal people, a seat at the bargaining table.

And I don't think it's just economic.

The economic thing, by the way, is very important.

Like you want the worker, whose life has been transformed by this technology, to have a seat at the table.

You want them to be able to actually bargain with the company for better wages.

Now that's impossible.

If you think about it like the individual worker to negotiate against, you know Dario, from Anthropic, it's not going to happen.

But workers working together, this is where the idea of collective bargaining came from.

But there's all kinds of interesting things.

And again, I think there's like a deeply Christian concept to this.

I know you're sort of, you know, fascinated by faith, but not a person of faith yourself.

There is a very deeply Christian concept that you have to give everybody in the country a seat at the table.

So for example, like, okay, there's the economic piece of it.

What about the cultural piece of it?

How will AI transform the culture that we consume, that we distribute, that we make?

Back in the 50s and 60s, it was broadly accepted that – now, it wasn't a censorship regime.

There was nothing legal going on here.

But it was broadly accepted that Hollywood would consult with the religious leaders at the time –

In order to ensure that the content they were making was actually consistent with the sensibilities of their membership and consistent with some basic Christian ideas.

Again, that wasn't forced, but there was this mechanism that gave everybody a seat at the table.

And I think that's one of the bad things about that.

We do not have a mechanism that gives powerful people that forces them to actually work with everybody else.

Religion was one of the ways that happened in the West.

I think probably the most profound and effective way that happened in the West.

We just don't have it anymore.

And I really worry about that.

So the president is supportive of the United States owning these big AI companies.

He likes the idea, as sort of a sovereign wealth fund idea, of the United States taking some stake in these AI companies.

He said so publicly.

I'm not breaking news.

But, you know, again, the president.

He is a very unconventional person.

You would say a Republican is not supposed to think like that.

The president doesn't care.

The president just thinks the thoughts that he has.

He develops them, whether they're you know.

He tries to determine is this a good idea or a bad idea?

I would call him sort of a radical pragmatist, though I think most Europeans think that he's this hyper ideological person.

He's extremely pragmatic. about this stuff.

But one very important thought.

The idea that we're gonna allow these companies let's say 10, 20 years down the road to accumulate trillions and trillions and trillions of dollars of wealth and then we're gonna be able to successfully redistribute it to workers.

I'm very skeptical of that.

Very skeptical of that.

I think that's a very modern I call it a liberal concept, this idea that you can just tax people and give it to poor people and it works out.

Then you turn the poor people into effectively subservience of the rich people.

You have to give everybody a stake in the society.

I haven't quite figured out how this is going to work in the age of AI.

I think labor unions are a very important model here.

This is the model where you just take from some people and give to other people.

That's never provided a stable society.

You've got to give the workers a seat at the table.

Mama, mama, mammal, mammal, mammal.

She passed away when you were 21 years old, rushed to hospital with a collapsed lung two days after her 72nd birthday.

And she was taken off life support.

She was clearly the most important figure in your life from reading your story for so many reasons.

She hasn't gotten to see the position you rose to today.

I read that you didn't cry when she passed away.

You didn't process those emotions either, because you sensed that your entire family was on the verge of collapse and you wanted to give the impression of emotional strength.

That's what you say in your book, Hillbilly, on page 169.

What would she think of you today?

What would she have said?

Well, I think, you know, she she she was, again, a deeply patriotic person.

He should be amazed by this.

I mean the pageantry being able to go to the White House, just things like that would have been very, very meaningful to her.

What would you say to her?

I think that I would say thank you.

I mean, maybe the most important lesson that I've learned is that the difference between good people and people who struggle is good people have a good sense of gratitude.

And I don't know that I would be alive were it not for this woman.

I certainly wouldn't be here.

And I think the one thing Mamaw would worry about and I think I've done a pretty good job, just to be clear but Mamaw would worry a lot about the pomp and the circumstance, in the same way that she would be amazed by it.

She would find it incredible and she would love to participate and see it.

She's always really, really worried.

She would always say, don't get too big for your britches.

And what that means is don't let it go to your head.

Don't think that you're better than somebody just because you have a title or because you have more money than they do.

And I think that I have to constantly remind myself that –

I get to be vice president for four years.

I'm going to do as good of a job as I can for that four years, but it doesn't make me better than anybody.

And it doesn't mean that I know more than anybody.

I mean I made it more about like CIA reports, but fundamentally, if you start to see yourself, I think is better than you become unable to successfully govern a democratic country.

Have you ever grieved the loss of Mama?

Oh, absolutely.

I mean, you know, I think I wrote in the book, I didn't cry when she died.

I cried a lot two days later.

Yeah, I mean, I've grieved her for a long time.

My biggest regret with Mama is just she never met Usha.

And there's something so similar about them, but so different.

Like, they're both incredibly smart.

Even though Memal left school, middle school, Usha went to law school.

They're incredibly blunt people, right?

I mean, Usha just doesn't have a filter.

It's.

One of the things I was immediately attracted to about her is that, even if she was going to offend you, she was going to say exactly what was on her mind.

But they came from such different worlds.

And I think my grandmother would be fascinated by her.

You know, when mom met Usha, And Usha, ethnically, is Indian.

She was born in the United States.

But my mom said, it just goes to show sometimes how little some of us knew about the world.

She said, what is she, like ethnically?

And I said, Mom, she's Indian.

And my mom says, which tribe?

Yeah.

So they came from very different worlds, both mom and Usha, but also mamaw and Usha.

But that is.

The biggest regret about her death is that you know, if she was the most important person in my life for the first 20 years, Usha is the most important for the rest of it.

And I really wish those two people could have met because they're amazing people.

The emotion is still right on the surface for you.

Very much so.

We have a closing tradition on this podcast where the last guest leaves a question for the next guest, not knowing who they're leaving it for.

Okay.

The question that's left for you is I think it was slightly biased, but the question is are aliens real?

That's interesting.

The answer is, I don't know.

It is something that I have sworn to myself.

I'm now a year and a half into this job that I would go through all of the highly classified information about everything that we know about UFOs.

I just haven't done it yet.

It's like one of these crazy things where you get in the job and the day-to-day just takes over.

So I haven't done that yet.

But, I mean, look, I am – I believe in things –

And I think that they're true and I think that they're rational, but I recognize that there may be even crazier than the idea that there are extraterrestrials.

Like I believe that a Jewish man about 2000 years ago was the only begotten son of God, was literally crucified and then rose from the dead three days later.

Like I recognize that sounds a little out there, but I think that it's true.

And I 100% believe that people have mystical experiences.

And I've talked to people who have been involved in exorcisms.

And again, I think the rational mind says, well, it's just schizophrenia.

That's some other mental illness.

I've talked to people who said yeah, 999 of the people that I've looked at to do an exorcism on were schizophrenic or had some other mental illness.

But there's something, there are weird things out there that we cannot explain.

There are weird moments.

I mean, I remember, not long after my grandmother died my sister lost.

You know, she didn't really lose her temper, but like got kind of angry with her daughter.

And her daughter's seven or eight years old at the time.

And like the light bulb just exploded. and both of us looked at each other like, that was mammal.

I remember I was talking I write about this in Communion I was talking to the New York Times writer about the Pope and sort of different perspectives on the Pope.

And he was more critical of the Pope.

And I was more, my attitude is like, ah, you know, he's not a politician.

You can't judge him by politician standards.

This is the last Pope.

And we're like having this conversation.

And it's like I'm telling you man, a glass just falls off the bar in a totally crazy way and shatters and like stops us dead in our tracks.

And we both just looked at each other and said, what the hell was that?

And I, I'm a believer in mystical experience.

I don't think they happen that often, but But I think that people have experiences that are impossible to explain if you have a purely narrow, hyper rational view of the world.

In other words, I think the hyper rational view of the world is actually not totally accurate.

There's some weird shit out there.

So you think aliens could be real?

I do.

Communion.

It's really interesting because I went on a similar journey to you in terms of new atheism very rational.

How can any of this be true?

Arguing with Christians every time that I had the opportunity to, in part to try and figure out my own opinion.

It was like a sparring match.

Of course.

And I now find myself as being an agnostic person and being open-minded and curious to new ideas.

And it's almost a humility that I wasn't humble before in that season of my life.

But now I'm like open that I could be completely wrong.

Sure.

And listening intently.

And I think this is why this book is so interesting because you represent, I think, the journey of a lot of people who have rationally talked themselves out of the possibility of faith but then have felt something is missing at some level, feel like they've been lied to by themselves or society or some kind of culture.

And then have had this sort of open-minded exploration back to a place of meaning.

And I'd say that that meaning and that sense of purpose is so absent in society at the moment.

And also, like you said, the Christians that I've interviewed here.

It doesn't feel to me to be a coincidence that they're the most virtuous anchored stable happy empathetic, charitable individuals I get to sit with.

And that itself appears to be proof of something.

And so your book here, Communion, Finding My Way Back to Faith...

It's, I think, a wonderful journey in that direction for anybody who finds themselves at any stage in that journey.

And it's out right now.

Mr. Vice President, thank you so much for your time.

I realize you're very busy, so it's a true honor that you chose to give me some of your time today.

I really, really appreciate it.

I really enjoyed this.

Thank you.

[J.D. Vance: Reflections on Childhood, Faith, and the Future of American Leadership]-[Vice President JD Vance: No One Saw This Coming, The Ceasefire Is Real!]

📋 Summary

Navigating Personal and Political Transformation: An Insight into J.D. Vance’s Journey

The Roots of Instability and the Role of Resilience

Rethinking Politics and the "Patriotic Reservoir"

Immigration and the Mechanics of Division

Foreign Policy and the Iran Deal

The Journey Back to Faith

Looking Ahead: AI and Society

🎯Key Sentences

📝Key Phrases

📖 Transcript

[J.D. Vance: Reflections on Childhood, Faith, and the Future of American Leadership]-[Vice President JD Vance: No One Saw This Coming, The Ceasefire Is Real!]

📋 Summary

Navigating Personal and Political Transformation: An Insight into J.D. Vance’s Journey

The Roots of Instability and the Role of Resilience

Rethinking Politics and the "Patriotic Reservoir"

Immigration and the Mechanics of Division

Foreign Policy and the Iran Deal

The Journey Back to Faith

Looking Ahead: AI and Society

Deep Learning with ListenLeap

🎯Key Sentences

📝Key Phrases

📖 Transcript

ListenLeap Brings You Into Real Context Learning