Hey Indicator listeners, Darien Woods here.
This week we are running our favourite episodes of the year.
Today's episode explores how Democratic and Republican members of Congress invest, and whether they're any good at it.
We'll have a small update for you at the end.
NPR. This is the Indicator from Planet Money, I'm Weylan Wang.
And I'm Darien Woods.
And we have NPR's congressional correspondent Deirdre Walsh with us today.
She's dialing in from the House of Representatives.
Hi Deirdre. Hey there.
Deirdre, the stock market is on a tear right now, and you reported this story that caught our attention about a company that partnered with the financial firm Subversive to allow everyday people to invest like members of Congress.
Right, so this was initially created by a trader who calls himself Unusual Wales.
Love the name. He has created two separate ETFs.
Exchange traded funds.
Right, that are modelled on the trades by members of Congress.
So he's using publicly available forms, disclosure forms by these lawmakers, or their spouses and dependent children's trades, to model one ETF called Nance, which is modelled on Democratic lawmakers trades named after former speaker Nancy Pelosi.
So casual. Nance. And another ETF called Cruz after Republican Texas Senator Ted Cruz.
Very good. To show how the two different parties' investment strategies are working in the market.
Darien, today on the show, you and I are going to invest in these two exchange traded funds, as in these funds that track a range of different companies.
One of us will go with Nance, comprising companies held by Democratic members of Congress, and the other will go the Cruz direction.
Companies held by Republicans.
And as we do this, we'll also consider whether politicians should even be allowed to play the market.
So, Deirdre, how do you think we're going to do?
I think you're going to do really well based on the past experience of these funds.
Well, past performance is no indication of future performance.
No, no. I think we're going to get rich, Darien.
If you can't beat him, join him.
Wait, wait, don't tell me.
Fresh air, up first.
NPR News Now, Planet Money, Ted Radio Hour, Thru Line, the NPR Politics Podcast, Code Switch, embedded Books We Love, Wild Card are just some of the podcasts you can enjoy.
Sponsor free with NPR+.
Get all sorts of perks across more than 20 podcasts with the bundle option.
Learn more at plus dot NPR dot org.
Donald Trump promised to change Washington, DC, a place where there's an old saying that personnel is policy.
That's why we have created a new podcast called Trump's terms, where you can follow NPR's coverage of the incoming Trump administration, from his cabinet secretaries to political advisors and top military leaders to understand who they are, what they believe and how they'll govern.
Listen to Trump's terms from NPR.
Every weekday, Up First gives you the news you need to start your day.
On the Sunday story from Up First, we slow down.
We bring you the best reporting from NPR journalists around the world, all in one major story, 30 minutes or less.
Join me every Sunday on the Up First podcast to sit down with the biggest stories from NPR.
Do you make resolutions in January?
We do. Specifically, we make pop culture resolutions.
We also check in on what we resolved to do this last year.
Did we catch up on all those classic movies or finally write that novel?
Find out on the Pop Culture Happy Hour podcast from NPR.
All right, so Waylon, I now have here the Planet Money Investment Fund.
It's a very sophisticated jar.
Oh, there's actually stuff in it because you know, the Planet Money stock trading experiments have not gone that well in the past, let's just say.
Yeah, the origin was in 2010 when the Planet Money team bought a toxic asset.
Needless to say, that didn't go so well.
Okay, should we count out how much we have to fritter away on this new experiment we're doing?
Invest. Invest, not fritter.
We have 50, 60, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77 dollars and I say a quarter and a dime.
Nice. $77 and 35 cents.
That's a great amount of capital to start with.
Now this should be enough to buy these exchange traded funds that are based on Congress members trading.
As we're taping now, one share of Nance or N -A -N -C is going for a little over $35 a share.
And then Cruise with the K, K -R -U -Z, it is almost $30.
So we'll each buy one share and we'll check back in a week to see how we did.
Wait, Waylon, what did we actually invest in?
Yeah, so I'm just taking a scroll through this portfolio.
I'm looking at what's in the Cruise ETF and the biggest category of holdings is actually oil and gas.
So almost 11 % of the Cruise ETF is in oil, gas and consumable fuels.
I'm going to look at the Democratic one on the N -A -N -C Nance ETF.
I'm seeing oil, gas and consumable fuels is actually 0 .65%.
So basically zero. Really less than a percent.
Oh gosh. Very little.
What about software?
Yeah, minus 6 .2%. Minus 17 and a half percent.
So Democratic Congress people love software, but Republicans less so.
Oh, that's interesting.
Yeah. And on the Dems list, I also see pharmaceuticals, retail, insurance.
Yep, same here. Investments all over the economy.
Well, I'm feeling good about my investment because the trading based on Democratic lawmakers and their families is up 20 % in the year to mid June.
And that's about 5 percentage points more than the S &P 500, which is a reasonable proxy for the overall US stock market.
Cruise hasn't done as well.
Those Republican lawmakers trades are on average up only 9%, not as good as the stock market as a whole.
But regardless, this raises the question of whether politicians are using inside information to profit from the stock market.
Yeah. Josh Graham Lynn is the CEO and co -founder of Represent Us, which is an anti -corruption advocacy group.
And he does not like the status quo.
Members of Congress who are serving the American people simply shouldn't be in a position to trade individual stocks.
Josh supports a bill to ban this trading.
This one is called the Ending Trading and Holdings and Congressional Stocks Act or the Ethics Act.
Very clever. Now Josh is okay with members of Congress investing in funds where they're tracking an overall rise in the market, just not trading individual companies.
I don't think anybody wants to limit members of Congress from making investments and having a positive retirement ahead of them.
It's when there's a perception of conflict of interest or perception of insider trading, that's what's really damaging to both Congress's credibility and the American people's trust in our political system.
Just 16 % of Americans surveyed by the Pew Research Center say they trust the government to do what's right just about always or most of the time.
Oh geez, that's really low, 16%.
Not so good. And with the stock trading they're doing, it would be good to know the reality.
Like are politicians systemically making outsized gains on their stock trading?
Short answer is no, absolutely not.
Bruce Sacidote is a Professor of Economics at Dartmouth College and he and his co -authors tallied all the congressional trades from 2012 to late 2020.
On average, they do average.
Stuff that they sell sometimes goes up, stuff that they buy goes up down and in our paper, they as a group underperform.
Bruce is not saying corruption in regards to trading never occurs.
It just doesn't appear to be systemic.
He finds even the top 1 % of traders don't look any different from stocks randomly picked, like the proverbial monkeys throwing darts at a dartboard.
Now, Bruce didn't test monkeys with darts, but he did test reindeer.
Actual reindeer. Yes.
Bruce and his college student co -authors did some further research where they literally went to a Christmas -style theme park called Santa's village and they got reindeer to pick stocks by walking on pages of the Wall Street Journal.
So they used the point of the hoof to decide which stock they were buying.
Well, you actually did this.
I was reading the paper and I wasn't sure if this was just a Christmas parody, but you actually got the reindeers to pick stocks?
Absolutely. And some of my favorite parts of the paper where we point out that they exhibit hurting behavior and that they're good at sniffing out new trends.
Bruce does say there is a serious point here.
The reindeer outperformed the Congresspeople and the senators on average, especially in a finite time horizon.
And a couple of good picks dominate everything.
And that point might carry over to the recent conversations about congressional leaders doing so well, because you have this idea that, well, maybe Nancy Pelosi is really killing it in Nvidia and other tech stocks.
But you have to ask yourself, okay, is that really inside information?
Or is it that she represents a district that has a lot of tech companies and when tech companies are doing well, she and her husband, Paul, are doing well.
So we asked Josh, the advocate for bans on congressional stock trading, whether this kind of evidence made him rethink his position.
I don't think so. I mean, think of it this way.
If you had an NBA player who was bad at rigging the rules in favor of their team, would you still let them rig the rules in favor of their team?
Of course not. Maybe this ethics bill would protect Congresspeople from their own bad stock picks.
It's been six months since we made this episode.
And now for the results of our experiment.
Nance or Nancy outperformed Cruz.
Nance grew at a higher rate, bringing in $4 and 56 cents.
Cruz brought in $2 and 77 cents.
Both did worse than the S &P 500 index.
After tax gains will be transferred over to the Planet Money Investment Fund.
Now. This episode was produced by Julia Richie with engineering by Kwesi Lee.
It was fact checked by Sierra Juarez.
Cake and Cannon edits the show and the indicator is a production of NPR.
On NPR's Book of the Day podcast, we hear from all sorts of writers making bold arguments like the late president Jimmy Carter on Citizens United.
So I think it's completely distorted the democratic purity or legitimacy of our elections in the United States.
We hear about his life as a writer and from his biographer about President Carter's complex legacy.
Listen to Book of the Day from NPR, wherever you get your podcasts.
Consider this is a daily news podcast and lately the news is about a big question.
How much can one guy change?
What will change look like for energy?
Schools. Take the department education closer.
Health care. Better and less expensive.
Follow coverage of a changing country.
Promises made. Promises kept.
We're going to keep our promises.
On Consider This, the afternoon news podcast from NPR.
