You know, Becca, being a parent is a little like not seeing a gorilla.
What?
No, no, hear me out.
So there's this experiment that two psychologists at my university undertook in 1999.
It's a famous paper that they wrote called gorillas in our midst.
What it was was a psychology experiment that looked at when people are focusing on one
trivial thing, how they can become effectively blind to a much bigger thing.
And here's how the experiment went.
They had videotapes that they were playing to undergraduate students.
And they were of basketball players, teams of basketball players, two teams of three
people, and they were passing basketballs back and forth.
And the people watching the tapes had to do just one thing, which is count the number
of passes between the players.
Okay.
And see how accurately they could count the passes.
It was kind of complicated because they were passing it back and forth and back and forth.
And then in the middle of the tape, a guy in a gorilla suit walks into the frame and
just walks back and forth and back and forth behind the people who were passing the ball.
And then at the end, the researcher says how many times did they pass the ball back
and forth and they give the number and then they ask what about the guy in the gorilla
suit and in like 46% of the cases, the people in the experiment said what guy in the gorilla
suit?
If you see this and you can see this on the internet, you can get this on YouTube.
It's the most obvious thing, but all they saw was passing the ball.
Now that's what it's like to be the parent of a little kid.
How so?
I'm not seeing the analogy here.
You're counting the passes and you miss the gorilla.
This is how to build a happy life.
I'm Arthur Brooks, Harvard professor and contributing writer at The Atlantic.
And I'm Rebecca Rashid, a producer at The Atlantic.
You're not paying attention to being happy and having a happy baby.
You're worried about whether or not you boil that pacifier.
You're not worried about the big picture of what's going on in your family and the relationships
that you're building because you're so completely distracted by counting the number of times
the kid went to the bathroom today.
I mean, there's a gorilla back there.
The gorilla is the most amazing thing.
Right.
I'm guilty.
I mean, when my kids were little, it was, I'm telling you, I could tell you every bit
of the news about what was going on in their little lives.
But a lot of the times I wasn't thinking to the stuff that I would really like to remember
today, which is what were we feeling, where were we going, how were they developing?
You know, sometimes I didn't even take as many pictures as I wish I had because I was
so occupied with the ball passing, the funniest thing, the most amazing thing, the guy in
the gorilla suit, slipped right by me.
There's a bunch of ways that you could modify your vision that would deliver on some of
the things that you want.
But they require acknowledging sacrifices.
If there's any area of life where our expectations for ourselves seem impossible to me, it's parenting.
We tend to be fixated on parenting outcomes.
And that really never works.
I want to understand how parents can actually make good decisions or maybe just good enough
decisions and be happy at the same time.
Thanks for doing the show.
Appreciate it.
Of course, I'm excited.
Can you start by introducing yourself on tape?
Do you like it?
I'm Emily Astor.
I'm a professor of economics at Brown University and the author of Expecting Better
Crib Sheet and the Family firm.
Emily Astor is an author on many sensitive issues in parenting.
As a trained economist, Astor takes a data centric approach to parental decision making.
Children parents had a best understand the data behind the so-called mandates of modern
parenting.
Now, Astor is an economist, not a mental health professional, but her analytical approach
to this personal subject provides a new lens into the complexities of any individual decision
making.
A lot of my work is on data and is on data in parenting and using data to make decisions
in pregnancy and around our child rearing.
Then also writing about the decision making part of it, the part of economics where we
think about trading off-cost and benefits and trying to have structured approaches to
how we make choices and in some ways, the sort of central pieces of everything I do is
that those tools which we might or narrowly think of as useful in kind of business settings
are also pretty useful in our personal lives.
Yeah.
And they think about being an economist as you and I are, is that you feel like you don't
know anything until you get the data.
So did you feel that about being a mom?
Like, yeah, I kind of know, but I don't have really strong opinions.
I better go out and get some data on it.
Was this me search rather than research?
Oh, absolutely.
No, there's no question.
Yes.
It's hugely me search and I love that.
So expecting better, which is the first book I wrote, was really a book that I wrote while
I was pregnant.
I sold the book at 35 weeks pregnant, having basically done all of this research just so
I could know what to do.
Right?
Some people, well, could I have a cup of coffee?
Maybe I'll read a few different sources and kind of just kind of decide what works for
me.
But I was like, no, I have to go.
I got to go down the rabbit hole in this.
This is how I'm going to approach the world as I'm going to find out what all the studies
about coffee say and what's the interesting empirical issues associated with this question
and how can I explain it to people?
So there's almost a sort of statistician approach even more than an economist approach.
But at a minimum, the decisions that we make should be made with all the facts in mind.
And it's almost never the case that the data is going to tell you the decision.
We can't almost can't approach the decision without knowing the evidence behind it.
So give me an example.
You're 35 weeks pregnant selling a book, by the way, that's just, that's awesome.
Tell me something that the data overruled some preconceived notion that you had and that
you started to behave differently.
So there are pieces of data that were surprising.
I mean, I think one place where the data probably pretty clearly affected what I was doing
there was about epidurals.
So you know, epidural is pain relief during labor.
And I think I'd sort of assume that I would do that.
Epidurals are really good at preventing labor pain, but they have some sort of limits and
some downsides in terms of recovery.
It's a place where actually the data doesn't at all make the decision for you.
So it's a sort of example of a place where when I got the data, it wasn't definitive in
one direction or the other.
But it was the thing that let me make the decision that was different than the decision I had
anticipated.
So it really is this sort of structure of like, we're going to get all the information
and then we're going to make a choice.
And that choice is going to be informed by the information and the data.
Do you think that since subsequent to the birth of your children that you do a lot of stuff
differently with your own kids on the basis of your research, if you kept this protocol
up of, you know, I don't know what to do with these kids.
Is this how you're approaching parenting day to day?
Particularly when they were younger.
Yeah.
So I think that there's a little bit of a progression.
So you know, you have your first kid and I like everyone else, I have my first kid and
then I guess I thought I would have time to like figure out how to do it.
You know, I would have time to do the research.
But actually when you have your first kid, there's no time to do anything except just like
basically hang on to the roller coaster and hope that like they buckles you incorrectly,
right?
And so that was a sort of chaotic mess for a few years.
When we had our second, I felt like I was in a much better position to be prepared.
And that's actually when I wrote the second book.
So I sort of wrote the second book post the second kid because it was much easier to focus
on the questions or the areas of decision making that I thought were really important.
And you write things about parenting and particularly when you write about kind of how to work through
the hard parts of parenting.
And you're a kid to sleep like dealing with discipline, you know, it's very easy to
write what you should do.
It's very hard to implement those things.
So I would say in my own parenting, I'm frequently trying to implement things that I'm failing
and implementing even though I know that I should implement them.
It's much easier to tell people what to do than to do it yourself.
I find.
Yeah, for sure.
I'm a happiness research on Wallowork.
So what, give me an example of something so we can make this more calm for you because
you know, we're talking in the abstract about parenting.
Okay.
So give me an example of something that, you know, that data say you got to do this and
then you'll wind up never doing this.
So here's the thing.
It's about sleep.
When you are encouraging your kids to sleep or trying to enforce a sleep schedule, particularly
with an older kid, data tells you basically three things.
You need to have a bedtime routine.
That's easy.
You shouldn't have screens before bed.
That's also not that hard.
And if your child is coming out of the room routinely, you know, disrupting you, which
is a common thing that little kids or older kids do, you should be consistent every time
in the way you react.
So if you have said that was the last hug, then every time they come out, you should,
you know, take them back into the room, put them in the bed, don't do another hug, you
know, leave when they come out again, you put them back in the room, you can.
So it turns out like that just that that will work.
Okay.
If you can implement that, that is basically a very effective.
It actually works pretty quickly, it works like within a few days, but it is almost impossible
I find to implement.
So I have one of my kids is older, she's very asleep.
But my other kid, it's sort of like a little more variable and we have many nights where
he will come out a lot of times.
And I will say this is the last time I'm going to do this, but I cannot follow through
on that.
I just know if I just do it one more time, then like eventually he will just go to sleep
and the kind of investment in the moment of like, do I want to be like holding the door
closed while he screams?
Like is that what I want to do with my night?
Even though I know that if I do the other thing, it's going to have these long term consequences.
You know, it's just things like that are just hard to follow.
Yeah, yeah, let him cry it out.
I was like, I think this I was fine letting you cry it out when it was, you know, when
my kids were babies because I think partly it was a much more controlled environment.
It was just like much easier to achieve.
And then older kid, you know, it's a whole other.
Yeah, they're like claiming they're dying.
And yeah, they're like, but I have to, I got to get out of the room because I have to
pee.
I don't think you have to pee.
You recently pee.
So okay, the picture that I'm getting here is that you should keep an open mind and be
open to evidence.
And you, Emily Oster, have a boatload of evidence because of what you do for a living.
But parents have evidence too based on their experiences and they should be willing and
flexible to update what they do and not be dogmatic on the basis of what people are telling
them, right?
So everybody can be kind of a their own kind of economist, but you have to think like an
economist, which is let's see what's really going on and change our behavior on the basis
of what we see and what the patterns actually are as opposed to what the internet is telling
me.
Is that fair?
Yeah, I think that's fair.
And I think it's particularly important as kids get older.
So it is going to be much less frequently the case that we can make statements like the
data shows X.
So to give you like a concrete example, there's a lot of really good data showing that
introducing allergens, like peanuts, eggs, things like that that introducing those to your
kids earlier rather than later reduces the risk of allergies later.
Okay, so that's it turns out it's just like a really good idea to give your kids allergens
early.
It's shown in randomized trials.
It's relatively straightforward to implement.
There are more things like that in little kid parenting where the data will tell you either
this is important or this is not important or you know, do whatever you want.
As your kids get bigger, the things that are coming up are more complicated and they
get really wrapped up in questions around what are our family values, what are we trying
to achieve, what we want our days to look like.
And once you're in that world, there is I think more space for just these kind of differences
and the outcomes that we're going to get to.
But what I think people should share or what I think would help people in these spaces
is just being more deliberate in the way they are making those decisions.
It's not that you should or should not rely on the internet.
It's that when you come into some complicated decision or some choice, you should sit down
and think about the choice and give the choice that the space that it needs in your brain.
And I think that's often what we are missing in this era of parenting.
We realize people are almost struggling with even articulating the different options.
And that's kind of getting in the way.
So let me give you like a concrete example of this.
So sort of discussing with them on the other day, the following issue.
Before they had kids, what they envisioned for their sort of family meal situation was
that they would all sit down, they and their spouse and their kid would sit down at the
table at six o'clock every night and they would eat an interesting meal that they had
prepared and then her 18 month old would love the food.
It would be like a wonderful family activity where they all sat there and enjoyed the food
and they got to cook interesting things and so on.
Like fast forward 18 months, the reality is that her kid isn't really like her food that
much and is kind of picky is just what it is.
It is impossible to achieve this thing that she was envisioning achieving.
It's impossible.
And it's not her fault.
It's not that she did something wrong.
It's just like kids are picky and there's a little bit of time and that's just the reality.
Other than recognizing, okay, I can't have this first best, but let me figure out what
are the key things I do want to have?
Is it more important to sit at the table or interesting foods or is it more important
to eat together as a family or be able to have more time for cooking?
There's a bunch of ways that you could modify your vision that would deliver on some of
the things that you want, but they require acknowledging sacrifices.
And so we sort of talked about the idea that by not confronting the limitations that
had arrived, she was not able to get to a second best.
She was envisioning the first best.
She can't have the first best.
So I was saying, let's think about what's the second best and instead we were in the 27th
best.
One of the things that we noticed is we became less and less and less scrupulous with
our parenting as the children were born.
So our first son was born and the pacifier falls out.
Oh my goodness, you're on the pass.
And so you've got a ziplock bag full of pacifiers and you take the old pacifier home, you boil
it and you boil it for 15 minutes or whatever it is and then you make sure it's completely
sterilized.
So the second kid comes along a couple years later and the pacifier falls out.
And so we find a drinking fountain and you rinse it off and you give it back to him.
Third child comes along and the pacifier falls out and the first thing you do is to look
and see if anybody's watching and then you wipe it off and put it back in her mouth.
And it turns out that she's the best adjusted of that would be number four.
But the third is like the best adjusted child, the least stressed out probably because that's
this bad parenting behavior is correlating with all sorts of other standards that we're
developing here.
And I mean, one of the first themes is be deliberate thing for yourself but also one of the
themes in your research is relax, man.
Right.
Yeah, absolutely.
Now, you're not a pediatrician and you're not a psychologist.
You're an economist.
What led you as an economist to take up this topic of parenting and families and how to
be parents and how to be kids?
Yeah, so pretty much becoming a parent was sort of the, that was my entry into parenting
and into writing about parenting.
But I think for me, I kind of came into parenting with the tools from my job.
I was familiar or comfortable with the idea of using tools of data analysis and structure
decision making in my life before my parenting.
And most of the writing that I do about parenting uses those tools, takes those insights.
I'm married and non-American.
So my wife's from Barcelona.
She thinks that Americans are all about fads and panics.
And all of American culture is a combination of fads and panics.
So it's like, we're all going to do this.
We all stand for the current thing or we're all freaked out and protesting this thing all
the time.
So she said, you know what, I don't think anything matters that much except love.
And she's sort of a monist in this way.
How terrible is that rule?
I don't think that's a terrible rule.
I mean, I think if you look at evidence on almost any individual parenting choice, you
would struggle to find concrete evidence that it sort of matters in some meaningful way.
We know on the one hand if we compare sort of across resource levels, so if we compare
across income groups in the US, that there are big differences in, say, school achievement
for kids based on what happens in the first years.
So obviously something that is going on is really important for various aspects of kids
development.
And yet it's very difficult to identify any individual piece of that.
Any individual thing that you as a parent could do to enhance this achievement metric or
whatever it is.
And I think like your wife have always sort of interpreted that result as sort of something
about not so much love, but even just sort of stability, that the idea that there's a
lot of value to sort of a kind of stable, well-resourced home.
And that that is something that we could be thinking about policy solutions to.
But that is not the same as like does your Montessori preschool have only wouldn't toys
or whatever.
Yeah, and did you listen to a lot of Mozart when you were still pregnant?
That turns out to be garbage.
That's a fact.
That's a fact.
You know, that's a combination of that and panic, right?
Which gets back to the point, right?
And now speaking of phas and panics, you write about parenting mandates.
So give an example of a parenting mandate.
So there's this idea that like if you're making infant formula, you have to boil the water.
And it's an example where it turns out the reason to do that is like effectively a hypothetical
risk for something that is more or less not definitely not going to happen or it's like
a tiny, tiny, tiny, tiny probability thing.
And I talk about this as like parenting mandates, unfunded parenting mandates, things where
you were told, you know, here is all of the 57,000 things you need to do.
And if you like add up the time for all of those things, it's, you know, 72 hours every
day.
And it's like, well, I only have 24 hours.
Like which of these things should I do?
It's like, well, all of them.
Okay.
But I already told you like that 72 hours of things was like, well, I guess do them faster.
It's like, well, you know, so what should we do instead?
I mean, I understand why there are rules.
I mean, I get it.
I guess that some of our listeners would say, well, what a privileged conversation.
You know, these people would have all accessed all this, you know, good data and where
raised and really stable homes.
And they can sit there and say that we don't need parenting mandates where a lot of people
didn't have access to this information and easy rules are the best way to do it.
You're not saying that we should get rid of all mandates or I don't know.
What's your mandate on mandates?
No.
What's hard?
I mean, this is a sort of key issue in public health communication, which is one that
came up all the time in the COVID pandemic as well.
We somehow need a way to communicate to people levels of risk.
So co-sleeping is a good example of this.
So the kind of rhetoric that we have on co-sleeping is like under no circumstance should you sleep
in the bed with your baby.
This is like the public health advice on this is, you know, that's extremely dangerous.
And we don't provide that with much nuance.
And in fact, if you look at the data on that, it is pretty nuanced in the sense that there
are safer and less safe ways to co-sleep.
So I think even in the safest, it carries some small risk.
But it is much riskier if one of the parents is smoking, if, you know, there are a lot
of covers in the bed, if the baby is premature early on in life.
There's all kinds of absurdities to that, which I think could be communicated, but aren't.
And people are left in a situation in which they almost may find it impossible and you haven't
provided them with another alternative.
All right.
So people say, literally, you've told me, I can't sleep with my baby and my baby will only
sleep with me.
So there's no solution for this.
And that's where you get into situations.
And this is the real things that happen where people say, well, I'm going to try really
hard to stay awake.
I'm going to hold the baby because that's the only way it'll sleep.
And I'm trying really hard to stay awake.
I'm going to go to, I'm going to sit on the couch.
You told me the worst possible thing is to sleep in the bed with my baby.
Well, it turns out the worst possible thing is to fall asleep accidentally on the couch
with your baby.
That is like 50 times as dangerous as co-sleeping in a safest way.
Now by not providing any subtlety in our public health messaging, we've left people in a situation
where the choice that they will make trying to achieve what you want is a worse choice.
And I don't have a solution to that, but I do think that we need to be far more thoughtful
about the way we're sending these messages because we're sending them to people and not
to autonomous robots who are able to just say the things that we want.
Yeah.
Now, there are obviously really bad ways to do that.
I mean, there are really irresponsible ways to throw out the rulebook and say, basically,
I don't believe any of this, so I'm going to smoke all I'm pregnant.
And there's a ton of evidence that says you shouldn't do that.
Unless should you drink all your pregnant, for example.
And there are all kinds of ways that you can put your baby at risk.
But there are some people that are more nuanced about that.
They're parents who are kind of countercultural parents.
And they say, I'm going to do these things because I want to do these things.
And I want to have a deep connection with my child and I don't really care what Daddy
Internet says.
What's your view on countercultural parenting where you figured out like people did for
millennia?
The broader answer, the broader thing, I think a lot of people struggle with is whiplashing
between decisions.
So probably the worst decision-making approach is to do one thing because one book says it
and then as soon as you read a different book or your mom comes to visit, do the other
thing.
The more you can make one choice and try to stick to it, the easier is your parenting
going to be since many of these choices that you make don't matter very much.
I mean, I think up to these issues that you raised, which is like, there are some things
which are very dangerous you should not do.
I mean, that's actually completely great.
What I think many people struggle with is that they struggle to implement that.
So that in the reality of it, the kind of, I'm just going to go with my gut, doesn't
work for everybody because for many people that can lead to, well, I actually wasn't really
sure and now I'm rethinking it because of the thing that's person at the playground
said to me.
So when people tell me like, I'm really confident in my decisions and I'm not really reading
books and I'm not really making them based on data and I just like, this is what I want
to do and this is what works for me.
I think that's like, that's absolutely fantastic.
When they say, I'm going to go in this direction, but then as soon as you say, well, there's
here's this piece of data.
It's like, oh, I don't know.
Maybe I made the wrong choice.
Then I think we're in a space where you actually aren't almost aren't able to go with your
gut because the stimulus of the information is the way you want to go, but you haven't
managed to process it correctly.
Yeah.
One of the reasons that people, they don't follow mandates is as you point out in your
work is because kids force a deviation from the script.
The kids themselves actually kind of force the deviation.
Lots of cases of this, you know, I want another hug and it's really compelling in the
turns that you want to give the child another hug, for example, or you know, when they get
a little bit older and bilingual households, one of the things that we, all of us in bilingual
households find is that the kids don't necessarily want to talk to the parent who speaks a non-English
language in the United States in that foreign language.
We see this again and again and again, that the non-native English-speaking parent will
be forced into English with the kid by the kid.
It happens all the time, path of least resistance.
So talk to me a little bit about kids forcing changes to the rules and if this is good or bad
or should we care?
Kids are people too.
One of the most challenging aspects of being a person who likes control who has children
is the realization that like there are some things that you basically can't make them
do.
There's many moments in parenting, whether it's sleep or food or something else where you
realize, oh, I actually can't force this person to do this thing.
It closely relates to a set of questions around how much autonomy your kids have and how much
of the way that your family operates is going to be driven by the things that the kid wants.
And when you should start thinking about that, when did your kid get a say in what extracurriculars
they do?
When they're 10 months old and you enroll them in baby music, presumably you're not like,
well, would you want to go to the baby music about raffi or do you want to go to the
Mozart baby music or just like enroll them in whatever thing is available?
When your kid is 15, presumably they do get a pretty significant say in what extracurriculars
they're doing.
But where's that line?
Like, when do you listen to them?
What's the time that you make that choice and how do you know it's going to be the right
choice or not the right choice in the long run?
I think that part of the kid autonomy around decision making is just, it's really challenging.
We've heard about the free-range parenting debate, which is this debate about whether
or not we overstructure our kids' lives and we over protect our kids within normal boundaries
of the current conversation, where would you put yourself in this debate?
So in terms of physical autonomy, which is almost how I think of the free-range parenting,
so how much do you let your kid walk to the library by themselves or walk home or I actually
think where I'm relative to my peer group somewhat far on this.
I actually think there's a lot of value to kids in having them navigate the world outside
of your four walls on their own is pretty important.
Yeah, okay, so you're more free-range than most people of your generation, most parents
of your generation for sure, right?
And you have this you not because you don't believe that risk exists, but because you,
as an economist, are trying to assess risk versus reward.
Is that fair to say?
I think that's fair to say, yep.
I think probably also you would assert and I would agree with you that the reason that
more people don't subscribe to this point of view is because all they hear about is
the risk.
They don't hear about the reward.
I mean, you don't hear on the news.
You know, child walks to library alone and has a great time and becomes better adjusted.
That's not a headline.
You know, when the kid doesn't get snatched.
And so that's a problem, isn't it when it's all a risk or reward in the way that we hear
about parenting?
Yeah, I think it is.
This goes along with the question of, you know, do I bring my kid their shoes at school
when they forget them?
You know, if my kid forgets their soccer shoes, is their job to bring them and they forget
their soccer shoes, what is my approach to that?
Do what extent do I bring them the soccer shoes or to what extent is it learning experience?
And I think that's a really complicated question.
In some ways, it's complicated for the same reason that it's complicated to know whether
I should go in and get my kid that last hug because I know that they will shut them
up now, but it will have consequences later.
You know, if I bring my kid their soccer shoes when they're 10, it's like, yeah, then
they'll have their soccer shoes and like it would be very bad if they had to play, you
know, somewhat bad if they had to sit out of this game.
But like, am I still bringing them their soccer shoes when they're 19 and they like went
to college?
So I find those conversations just really difficult to navigate to think about what's the right
thing to do.
Yeah.
And by the way, helicopter parenting is all about bringing your child her soccer shoes
at age 19 when she's a sophomore in college.
I mean, that's absolutely there's a ton of data on this.
There's a ton of actually interesting research on this that shows that helicopter parenting
lowers the sense of autonomy and creases rates of depression and anxiety and attenuates
the relationship with the parents.
All the things you think it's not supposed to do, it does.
All the good things you think it's going to bring it brings the opposite is the bottom
line.
That's why freedom and autonomy are so critically important.
But habits or habits and habits are ingrained when the kids are little, right?
It's almost that you need a deliberate break in those habits because it's really hard
to break those habits when your kid is older because things feel more consequential.
Because it's like, well, now it's the soccer game that the recruiters are at.
And so I can't like have them forget their shoes for that game.
There does have to be a point at which you say, now this is your job.
Like you as a kid, this is your job.
But it's going to mean that you're going to have to follow through on some consequences.
And that's a choice people have to make.
Yeah, we started with being pregnant and getting out, getting out.
And now our kids are forgetting their like soccer shoes.
Yeah, soccer shoes in college, but we're making this progression.
It's interesting.
You know, my kids will bring up that, you know, I had a technique that I used when my
kids were in high school.
So I made my kids write a business plan.
And they made very original business plans and they all kind of did their own thing.
I mean, one went to Princeton University, a famous university, did really well.
Everyone went, worked on a farm for two years and that was a sniper in the Marine Corps.
And one of them made a run for the border and is studying in Spain.
And they were all part of their, you know, what they were going to do.
Do you agree with that approach?
And how do you feel about trying to tease out the way that our kids can be, you know,
their own person from the very beginning?
Or is that a dangerous way of approaching parenthood?
Should you be giving them more parameters or trying to encourage them to be kind of free?
Yeah, I mean, I'm not sure I would tell everyone they need their kids to make a business
plan.
Although I like, well, you're getting at that.
I really find resident is the idea of your kids not being an extension of your dreams fulfilled
or unfulfilled.
We all have these, these images or these ideas for like what are kids are going to be or
what they're going to be excited about.
And a lot of times they're the things that we're good at, the things that resonate with
us.
And for many of us, a part of parenting that is challenging is seeing, you know, okay,
well, this is what my kid wants to do.
And maybe it's not the thing I envision for them, maybe it's not the thing that I envision
for myself, but it's the thing that they like.
And then it's the thing that I need to sort of celebrate the ways in which this person
is in fact a person.
And that becomes so much more vivid and visual as your kids get older, you sort of realize.
And that's a part of my own parenting.
I find both very, very rewarding and also very hard.
You know, it's easy for me to connect with the pieces of like my daughter that we are
very similar, but much harder on the things that she's good at that I'm not.
But they're also the most fun things to be like, oh my gosh, I could never do that.
Like, I could just absolutely never do that.
And I'm so impressed that you that you can.
No, it's amazing.
And when you actually see these things, they know when you're amazed too.
They know when you're blowing smoke.
They know when you're, oh, that's wonderful.
They can sense a participation trophy at 100 meters.
Exactly.
But boy, oh boy, do they know when they've amazed their parents.
So it courage them to do amazing things and then be authentically amazed.
So my daughter plays a violin and she's like, quite good at it.
And I like, I listen, I'm like, wow, like I don't even know what you're talking about.
You know, she's like, oh, that's it.
I'm like, I don't understand the words, but it sounds nice.
That's fantastic.
What do you think is the single biggest mistake that American parents are making today?
Probably overthinking it.
And I mean, I feel like that's such a ridiculous thing for someone like me to say who's
like a tire thing is like, think more about your parenting and be more deliberate.
Like, probably there is a sort of mistake somewhere in here around planning it too much
or relying too much on this idea that like if I could only get this one, like if I could
only find the one key, there's like one key to getting it right.
There's no key to getting it right.
Thank you to our how-to listeners who helped make this show what it is.
We asked you to tell us about your most clever parenting moment.
And here's what you said.
Hi, this is Marilyn from Ockpark, Illinois.
And I think one of my cleverest parenting moments was when my daughter was in middle school
and she posted something that we thought she shouldn't have on social media.
As punishment for her irresponsible use of technology, we took away her phone and told
her that for the next week she couldn't use any technology that wasn't available in
1976, which was when I was in middle school.
That mostly meant that she could only use the landline phone in the kitchen and had to
stand next to the wall, pretending the phone was on a cord.
Years later, we still talk about how fun that week was and I think all of us learned some
good lessons.
I remember, for example, that I kept reading that if my baby was crying during the night,
you should just let him cry it out.
Cry it out, cry it out, cry it out, cry it out.
They call it crying it out.
And it's like, I don't want to let him cry it out.
I don't want to do that.
And so I decided I wasn't going to.
And it was fine.
He didn't grow up to be a bank robber.
He didn't grow up to be a horrible, spoiled person.
You know, he's great.
Did well in school and took responsibility for his actions, despite the fact that I didn't
let him cry it out all the time.
And I remember I was kind of worried at the time that I was stunting his growth because
I was trying to, you know, do something that would satisfy my own desires.
But the truth of the matter was that as time went on, I realized that there's just a lot
more flexibility and things that you do.
I recognize why they have these guidelines.
It's probably good advice, but it's just not something to...
You shouldn't set your watch to, you know, parenting regulations.
This is what I found.
And that was important for me to figure out.
And it turned out that it's not as bad as they say or at least, I don't know.
I mean, the truth is I still don't know.
I still don't know.
And, you know, I'll be a grandfather and not know.
So I guess I'm more comfortable with not knowing.
That's all for this week's episode of How to Build a Happy Life.
This episode was produced by me, Rebecca Rashid, and hosted by Arthur Brooks, editing
by AC Valdez and Claudine Ibeath.
Fact check by Anna Alvarado.
Our engineer is Matthew Simonson.
