Welcome to the Huberman Lab podcast where we discuss science and science-based tools for everyday life.
I'm Andrew Huberman and I'm a professor of neurobiology and ophthalmology at Stanford School of Medicine.
My guest today is Dr. Cal Newport. Dr. Cal Newport is a professor of computer science at Georgetown University.
He did his training at MIT and he is currently both a professor and the author of many best-selling books focused on productivity, focus, and how to access the specific states of mind to bring out your best in terms of cognitive performance and indeed in terms of performance in all endeavors.
One of his more notable books is entitled Deep Work, Rules for Focus Success in a Distracted World. Deep Work is a book that has had tremendous positive influence on my work life and indeed my life in general because it spells out how exactly to go about doing one's best possible work.
For me, that's in the context of science and podcasting but it includes tools that I and many others have extended to other aspects of their life as well and it's a book that I highly, highly recommend everybody read.
Cal also has a new book out now, it's one that I'm currently reading entitled Slow Productivity, The Lost Art of Accomplishment Without Burnout.
And as the title suggests, it gets into specific protocols to avoid burnout and to bring about one's highest quality work over the greatest amount of time.
Today's discussion starts off with extremely practical steps that any and all of us can use in order to enhance our level of focus, productivity, and creativity.
Cal shares much of his specific practices and also offers some alternative practices for those of you that perhaps do not want to disengage with social media or with smartphones or with email to the extent that he does.
I found the conversation to be extremely useful in the sense that I indeed amounted on social media, I use email, I use my phone and texting quite often so I'm not somebody who's willing to completely disengage from those tools but I share in the sentiment that those tools can often be an impediment to doing one's best work.
So today's discussion gets into not hard and fast rules for enhancing focus and productivity but a variety of different tools that you can select from in sort of a buffet to suit your particular needs.
We also of course discuss the specific research studies around focus and distraction, task switching and context switching, all of which support the specific protocols that Cal offers.
So whether you're somebody who has issues with attention and focus, whether you're somebody that's just feeling overly distracted by the number of things in your email inbox or the number of texts or what's happening out in the world.
By the end of today's episode, I'm confident that you will be armed with the best science supported tools that is protocols in order to access the states of mind that will enable you to do your best possible work.
Before we begin, I'd like to emphasize that this podcast is separate from my teaching and research roles at Stanford.
It is however part of my desire and effort to bring zero cost to consumer information about science and science related tools to the general public.
In keeping with that theme, I'd like to thank the sponsors of today's podcast.
Our first sponsor is Helix Sleep. Helix Sleep makes mattresses and pillows that are of the absolute highest quality.
I've spoken many times before on this podcast about the fact that quality sleep is the foundation of mental health, physical health and performance.
And to get the best possible night sleep, it's absolutely key that you're sleeping surface. That is your mattress, suit your specific needs.
Helix understands this and they develop a brief two-minute quiz in which you can match your body type and sleep preferences.
That is whether or not you sleep on your back, your side or your stomach, whether or not you tend to run hot or cold in the middle of the night.
So you don't know the answers to those questions. That's okay. You answer the questions in that brief two-minute quiz and they match you to the specific mattress ideal for your sleep needs.
In my case, that was the Dusk DUSK mattress. I started sleeping on a Dusk mattress well over three years ago and it has significantly improved my sleep.
And as a consequence, I feel more focused and alert. I'm better able to do all the things that I need to cognitively physically throughout the day.
So if you're interested in upgrading your mattress, simply go to helixleap.com slash huberman. Take that brief two-minute quiz and they'll match you to a customized mattress ideal for you.
You'll get up to $350 off any mattress order and two free pillows. Again, go to helixleap.com slash huberman for up to $350 off and two free pillows.
Today's episode is also brought to us by Maui Newi Venison. Maui Newi Venison is the most nutrient dense and delicious red meat available.
Spoken before on this podcast and there's general consensus that most people should strive to consume approximately one gram of protein per pound of body weight.
Now, when one strives to do that, it's important to maximize the quality of that protein intake to the calorie ratio because you don't want to consume an excess of calories when trying to get that one gram of protein per pound of body weight.
Maui Newi Venison has an extremely high quality protein to calorie ratio so it makes getting that one gram of protein per pound of body weight extremely easy.
It's also delicious. Personally, I like the ground venison. I also like the venison steaks. And then for convenience, when I'm on the road, I like the jerky.
The jerky is a very high protein to calorie ratio so it has as much as 10 grams of protein per jerky stick and it has something like only like 55 calories.
So again, making it very easy to get enough protein without consuming excess calories. If you would like to try Maui Newi Venison, you can go to Maui Newi Venison.com slash Huberman to get 20% off your first order.
Again, that's Maui Newi Venison.com slash Huberman to get 20% off.
Today's episode is also brought to us by Juve. Juve makes medical grade red light therapy devices.
Now, if there's one theme that I've consistently put forward on this podcast, it's the powerful role that light has on our mental health, physical health, and performance.
Juve makes medical grade devices that emit both red and near infrared light.
Red and near infrared light is so-called long wavelength light and it's able to penetrate deeper into tissues than shorter wavelength light, like blue and green lights.
Those red and near infrared long wavelength lights have been shown to be beneficial for everything from skin health to wound healing to eye health and even for mitochondrial health.
What sets Juve apart from other red light and near infrared light devices is that they are clinically proven to emit the specific wavelengths at the specific intensities required to achieve specific biological effects.
Personally, I use the Juve handheld light, both at home and when I travel, it's only about the size of a sandwich. It's very convenient to use. I also have a Juve whole body panel and I use that about three or four times a week.
If you would like to try Juve, you can go to j0ovv.com slash Huberman. Juve is offering an exclusive discount to all Huberman lab listeners with up to $400 off select Juve products.
Again, that's juj0ovv.com slash Huberman to get $400 off select Juve products.
And now for my discussion with Dr. Cal Newport. Dr. Cal Newport. Welcome. Dr. Huberman, it's good to see you.
I'm a huge fan. I've been a huge fan ever since I read Deep Work. I can't say that I've adopted all the principles, but that's on me, not you.
You provide incredible incentive for Y1, ought to pursue Deep Work and slow productivity in service to high quality, true productivity, etc.
Some of the protocols, as we'll call them, are incredibly easy to implement. Others take some discipline. So I'd like to talk about both sets today.
But the first question I have is, do you own a smartphone?
I do have a smartphone. Yeah. Well, here's the thing. I don't use social media. So it turns out smartphones aren't that interesting if you don't have any social media apps on it.
Yeah, what's that like? So there's nothing if you have nothing that is engineered to try to grab your attention.
The smartphone actually goes back to 2007 Steve Jobs keynote address smartphone, which is this is a really nice phone.
And your music, you can listen to things on it and the phone interface is really good. And look, there's a maps app and you can like look at maps on it.
Like it's actually a useful piece of technology that you're happy to have, but you don't use it that much.
What about text messaging? Do you text message? And so do you get into conversations by text or is it more of a plan and meet type tool?
I try. Right. So I try. I do use text messaging. I mean, this is how like my wife gets in touch with me. But I'm notorious somewhat among my friends of my the ability to capture my attention with text message is really hit or miss because I'll go hours without looking at my phone.
So it's not this default appendage. I think for a lot of people, if you know someone, you can basically assume like, look, if I text them, they're going to get right back to me.
My problem is I'll go to three, four hours, you know, without looking at my phone. And then there'll be text messages on there from conversations that people were trying to start. And I typically just have to declare text bankruptcy a few times a day.
Like if they really needed me, I guess they would have called. So I do text, but I'm not considered to be very good at it.
If you have any other questions about your phone practices, this makes me nervous. Is your phone in a drawer on on the desktop while you're working? Is it face down face up? Is the ringer on? Is it off?
You need if I'm writing or what it's no or near me. Yeah. And it could be anywhere. It's just not going anywhere near me. So I have in my house. Two different offices basically. Right. So there's a home office.
The printers there, the filing cabinets are there, like the nice big monitors there, you pay taxes, that type of thing. Then I have a library. And there's no permanent technology into library, no computer in there, no monitor, no printers, nothing like this.
I have to sort of custom built desk I had made by a company from Maine that makes desks for college libraries. Like that's what they do. So I had this like custom fit desk to fit into. It's not that big of a space.
I'm just trying to go to write it. I'm surrounded by books that I've really carefully curated. What's where each shelf like what type of book it has on it so I can look different ways for different inspirations. I got a fireplace.
So I can just turn on a fire if I need it. I'll bring my laptop in there to write if I'm going to write on a computer and my phone doesn't come in there.
You don't look at you don't look at a phone in that room and it just helps me. It's a ritual right if I'm in there. I'm thinking I'm creating with the sort of same patterns of cogitation that we would have been using for hundreds of years when people have been thinking professionally.
If I want to be near a printer and I want to go on to a web browser and pay my taxes or whatever have a different place for that.
I'm curious about the fireplace. I have this theory based on my understanding of visual neuroscience and the fact that when we're looking at visual scenes that have some degree of predictability to them.
We get into a mode of anticipation or thinking is at least somewhat linear and so forth. When we are looking at say ocean waves or
in a skyscraper we're staring down at the street of say New York City and the cars are moving in obviously not random fashion but at least to our visual perception pseudo random.
You're not tracking any one thing that the mind goes into this sort of state where our thoughts become nonlinear.
They're not anchored to any kind of if then kind of what I call DPO duration path outcome kind of trajectory. It's not a lot of neuroscience on this but there's a little bit same thing happens when you're looking at aquarium by the way.
So I wonder whether not staring at the fire which is something that humans have been doing for many many many thousands of years.
Because it has that random aspect to it does it tend to spark creativity linear thinking at what point in your writing do you turn to the fire and stare at it.
That's interesting actually that there's a neurological explanation when I used to fire is actually when I read right so chairs by the fire but I think for exactly this reason right because when I'm reading I'm looking to spark ideas right like okay what am I what's my take away from this what's the connection you're making between this thing you're reading here.
This idea over there that type of connection making a lot of my brainstorming I read by the fire when the weather allows it I also walk a lot so I want to do something similar going on like when I'm trying to work through an idea for an article or a math proof or something like this almost always I'm going to do that on foot.
And there might be something similar going on there where your encountering is not entirely exotic stimuli right so it's not oh my god you know my attention is being drawn but it's you don't quite know what you're going to see and you also have that that circuit quieting effect of the walkings your motor neurons are going you can tell if I'm getting this right or not.
Yeah, the motor neurons are going and you get some inhibition going on in some of these key networks which allows you to actually maintain the internal focus on a concept a little bit better so I do a lot of my original focused ID 18 on foot but a lot of my serendipitous ID 18 will be with the fire going right it's the way I read by the fire and it's when I read that I get a lot of my original ideas.
I have this theory that the two opposite states of mind that both facilitate creativity and productivity looks something like this and you can tell me whether or not this maps anything that you know one is just as you described our body is in motion.
And could be running walking might even be in the shower or something that sort but we aren't trying to direct our mind toward a specific linear trajectory or outcome it's not it's not like working out an equation or a theorem the same way we would if we're at a piece of paper or writing out a sentence a structured paragraph so it's body and motion mind not channel toward one specific target.
The opposite extreme to me is body still mind very active which resembles rapid eye movement sleep when we learn a lot and no rewiring occurs and dreaming but for which there's also a lot of examples of very accomplished creatives using that sort of thing of meditative like.
And approaches you know forcing oneself to be still and thinking so it sounds like you incorporate both and I'm curious as a computer scientist who writes code does theorems does a lot of math where you can't just kind of wing it yeah there's a right and wrong answer involved what is your mode for sitting down and working through something that's linear and hard.
It's interesting the way you talk about it right because when I'm walking and this is actually something you can train you know I talk about this one of my books once that you can actually train yourself to maintain your internal eye of focus more stable while you're walking right so I call this productive meditation in deep work actually.
I practice this in grad school right okay so I'm going to work on a particular problem while I walk and then you actually practice bringing your attention back to the central problem and I don't know exactly what's happening but you get a little bit more facility working with your working memory a little bit more efficiency with bringing stuff in and out of the working memory.
So I train myself that I could actually write a couple paragraphs in my head maybe not word for what basically word for word like figure out how I'm going to do it or figure out enough steps of a math proof to capture like a key insight like okay now I'm going to get around this then you have to sit down and actually formally capture that yeah for me that's still working with notebooks.
Though I was coming up in grad school and I was just excavating these thoughts recently we were talking for the we recorded that you know I just wrote this essay about what I learned as a grad student that impacted all my writing as a grad student in the theory group at MIT which was just purified concentration this is where all the deep work ideas come from right I mean it was just world class concentrators there the method was very still more than one person whiteboard so if you have two or three people staring at me.
So you're three people staring at the same whiteboard you're actually going to up to level of concentration you achieve because if you let your attention wander you disengage that attention there's a social capital cost because now I've fallen out of the whiteboard effect discussion that's going to be a problem so you actually maintain your focus at a higher level and then when someone else is making their move okay you know what about this and they're working math it's all math on the board.
And even that the highest attention you're capable of because you want to keep up right you don't want to fall behind so it was like this hack that was figured out in the theory group that if you put two or three people at the same whiteboard to try to alchemize these insights into actual mathematically precise proofs you get 20 30% boost in your concentration level and that could make all the difference right if you're working on a very hard proof 20 30% boost could be the difference between solving it or not.
In one of these situations where you're at the whiteboard or chalkboard and there are two other individuals facing it are they interrupting you or is the etiquette in that scenario to just let the person go until their natural inclination to raise a hand and scream help
whoever has to mark around the board they're the ones talking so you go okay what about this you say and now you're working you're writing down equations or drawing your diagram and everyone is just watching and then when they're done they're one steps back and looks at it then you can step forward okay but what if we did this and you still work on it so so when I got built some offices or worked out some offices near my house like one of the first things we put in there was a whiteboard so they could have computer science collaborators come because we can't work on theory otherwise like it is the thing that I'm going to do is I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm
going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going
to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to
do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do
a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a
little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little
bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit
of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of
work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work
and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and
I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I
I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I
am going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm
going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going to do a little bit of work and I'm going
to move proofs out of a notebook and into formally marked up like you would for a paper, you know, as soon as I would. So this idea, this is something I've been leaning to more is capture the notes in the tool you're going to use take out the middle man in some sense, right. So it's reducing friction but also puts you in the right mind space like, okay, this idea I'm going to put it where I'm going to need it later as opposed to a more elaborate third party system that you construct that you then later pull everything out of as needed.
So let's just get straight to the tool I'm eventually going to use with maybe a high quality notebook intermediary if I'm actually literally working out thoughts. So math, you have to work out thoughts, but I'll get that into an actual paper format pretty quickly.
Tell me what you think of this what I always call protocol. If I want to learn something from a manuscript I read or a book chapter, I used to highlight things and I had a very elaborate extracted from my university days system of stars.
An exclamation marks and underlined that mean a lot to me that can, yes, bring me back to a given segment within the chapter.
But a few years ago I was teaching a course in the biology department at Stanford and for some reason we had them read a study about information retention.
And I learned from that study that one of the best things we can do is read information in whatever form, a magazine, research article, etc. book.
And then to take some time away from that material, maybe walk, maybe close ones eyes, maybe leave them open doesn't matter and just try and remember specific elements.
How much does one remember then go back to the material and look at it. And I've just been positively astonished at how much more information I can learn when I'm not simply going through motor commands of just underlining things and highlighting them but stepping away and thinking, OK, yeah, I don't I don't remember how many subjects there were.
So we're all go back and check that maybe make a note and OK, they did this and then like and then it's crystallized.
And when as I say this, I realize of course this should work. This is the way that the brain learns.
But somehow that's not the way we are taught to learn.
Yeah, well, I'm smiling because when I was 22, I wrote this book called How to Become a Straight A Student.
Right. And the whole premise of the book was I'm going to talk to actual college students who have straight A's and who don't seem completely ground out, right, like not burnt out.
And I'm just going to interview them right in the protocol was how did you study for the last test to do study for how did you take notes for the last.
So I was just asking them to walk through their methodology. The core idea of that book was active recall.
That was the core idea that replicating ideas, ways to say is replicating the information from scratch as if teaching a class without looking at your notes.
That is the only way to learn.
And the thing about it was it's a trade off. It doesn't take its efficient doesn't take much time, but it's incredibly mentally taxing right.
This is why students often avoid it. It is difficult to sit there and try to replicate and pull forth.
OK, what did I read here? How did that work? It's mentally very taxing. But it's very time efficient.
Right, if you're willing to essentially put up with that with that pain, you learn very quickly. And not only do you learn very quickly, you don't forget.
It's almost like you have a pseudo photographic memory when you study this way, you sit down to do a test and you're replicating like whole lines from like what you what you studied.
I the idea is sort of come out fully formed good is such a fantastic way to actually learn.
It was my key like the whole premise that got me writing that book is I went through this this period as a college student where I came in freshman year was like a fine student, not a great student, but a fine student.
And I was rowing crew and I was sort of like excited to do that. And then I developed the heart condition and had to stop a congenital wiring in the heart, a true flutter thing.
I couldn't row crew anymore, so prolapse some sort. It was a circuitry circuitry issue that would lead to extremely rapid heartbeat.
It's like a really rapid like to cardio, right, you get to 250 beats a minute just and it can be exercise induced, right, which is not optimal.
You could take beta blockers, which would moderate the electrical timing, but beta blockers reduce your max heart rate. And if you're an athlete where the entire thing that matters is your max heart rate. So you're doing something like 2000 meter rows, your performance on beta blockers just goes down.
It makes no sense. It's like being a basketball player that weighs weighted shoes is too frustrating.
It also makes you super malo. I was pretty milo guy, but I was a worse rower. So so I stopped that I was like, OK, I want to get serious about my studies. I was able to get serious about my studies and writing, right. That's when I actually made the decisions they didn't stuck with for the next 25 years after that.
But one of the things I did to get serious about my studies is I said, I'm going to systematically experiment with how to study for tests and how to write papers. And I had I would try this how did it go deconstruct experiment try this how to go deconstruct experiment.
And active recall is a thing to term you all around. And so I went from a pretty good student to for every single quarter sophomore year junior year senior year, I got one a minus between my sophomore year through my senior year. It was like this miraculous transformation. It was active recall.
I rebuilt all of my studying. So if it was for a humanities class, I had a whole way of taking notes. It was all built around doing active recall for math classes. My main study tool was a stack of white paper. All right, do this proof white piece of paper and just can't I do it from scratch. If I could I know that technique.
If I don't, I'm going to come back and try it again later completely transformed. You know, I did so well academically. It's why I ended up writing that book. The basically spread that message to other people. So I'm a huge advocate for active recall. It's really hard.
But it is the way to learn new things.
I'd like to take a brief moment and thank one of our sponsors and that's AG one.
AG one is a vitamin mineral probiotic drink that also contains adaptogens. I started taking AG one way back in 2012. The reason I started taking it and the reason I still take it every day is that it ensures that I meet all of my quotas for vitamins and minerals.
And it ensures that I get enough prebiotic and probiotic to support gut health. Now gut health is something that over the last 10 years we realized is not just important for the health of our gut, but also for our immune system.
And for the production of neurotransmitters and neuromodulators, things like dopamine and serotonin. In other words, gut health is critical for proper brain functioning. Now of course I strive to consume healthy whole foods for the majority of my nutritional intake every single day.
But there are a number of things in AG one, including specific micronutrients that are hard to get from whole foods or at least insufficient quantities.
So AG one allows me to get the vitamins and minerals that I need, probiotics, prebiotics, the adaptogens and critical micronutrients. So anytime somebody asks me if they were to take just one supplement, what that supplement should be, I tell them AG one because AG one supports so many different systems within the body that are involved in mental health, physical health and performance.
To try AG one, go to drinkag1.com slash Huberman and you'll get a year supply of vitamin D3K2 and 5 free travel packs of AG one. Again, that's drinkag1.com slash Huberman.
And as you pointed out, is this very time efficient?
Oh yeah.
I mean, it was a problem. It was a social problem for me that I would have to pretend during finals period that I was going to the library to study because I would be done studying.
This act of recall, it's brutal, but it's incredibly efficient. You sit down there, I would have my cards, I would mark it. Okay, I struggled with this. I'd put it in this pile. I got it done. I'd put it in this pile.
And so then you would just go back to the I struggled with it pile and work on that and then make a new I struggled with a pile and these would exponentially decay.
And so in like a few hours, you could really master, you know, with a few other tricks that worked, you could really master the material pretty quickly. And then what am I supposed to do? I didn't do all nighters. You want to make any sense like active recall is how you prepare and it's going to take four hours and it's going to be tough.
So do it in the morning when you have energy and then you're done.
I love it. I learned essentially all of neuro anatomy looking down the my scope at tissue samples.
And then I would try and take photographs with my eyes. I do not have a photographic memory, but then I would get home in the evening, look through the neuro anatomy textbook, lie down and try and fly through the different circuits in my mind.
And then if I arrived at a structure in the brain that I couldn't identify, I would then go check my notes and go back. So basically I learned neuro anatomy, which I, you know, I'm poor. I'd agree many things in life, but neuro anatomy, I'm solid at.
And then some, if I may say so. And it's because there's a mental map. You can move through it, you know, fly through it dynamically.
And that it's the same process. Not all things lend themselves to that approach. I'm guessing maybe we could think of a few that don't.
I guess if people were learning music. That might be tricky. Maybe they need the sheet music in front of them. I don't know. I'm not a musician.
Yeah. I mean, I studied a professional guitar player at one point. You were a professional guitar player. No, I studied one.
Oh, so for a book, everything's from some book. I written a lot of books. So I wrote a book 10 years ago, where I was trying to figure out as part of it, how do people get better at things.
And so I spent time with professional guitar player to say, I just wanted to see how he practiced. Like what does this actually look like?
What I learned from them is like, what they do is, yeah, they have the music in front of them. But for them, it's all speed. So they take a piece. He was working on Lex for he was a new acoustic style player. And they had these kind of blue grassy type of licks.
And he probably had a memorize. And he knew how fast he could comfortably play it for them. It's all about adding 20% to what they're comfortably doing. And then that push past for their comfortable.
And the thing I remember writing about him was he was concentrating so hard to try to hit this lick 20% faster than he was used to it as a he'd forget the breathe.
So he'd be like going, going, going, and then just gasp, you know, like his body would, you know, force him for some the breathe. So yeah, there it seemed to be all about deliberate practice. So like, how do you, they don't waste any time professional musicians waste no time doing things they're comfortable doing.
Every time they spend practicing, and this is also incredibly difficult, but every time they spend practicing is almost entirely in a state of, I'm not comfortable with this. But if I focus as hard as I can, maybe I'm going to pull this off.
Like I'll pull off the sonata at this new speed I'm trying to do maybe I'll pull it off. It's like the maximal growth stimulating state. And so I wrote in the in this chapter.
Why was he so much better at guitar than I was at the same age because I played a lot of guitar when I was younger and was in rock bands right and this kid was young right but really, really good.
And I said, okay, now I realize it I can recognize me when I look back at my time playing guitar at his age, I played stuff I knew how to play.
Like that's what was fun. Like yeah, I want to like jam along with the songs I knew or you know, rip some pentatonic scales, you know, to like a Jimmy Hendrix album.
It was fun and he spent almost no time the pros, but no time having fun. Practicing was your brain had to be, you know, uncomfortable.
So I learned a lot from that, you know, this actually led to a bit of a battle because of my readers, there was this, this battle that emerged where people were trying to combine Anders Erickson and deliberate practice with me, Haley chick sent me high and flow.
And really they were trying to make flow apply everywhere like it's all about flow, deliberate practices flow, everything is flow, the whole thing is to get into a state of flow.
And I remember Anders talking about this at some point and say like no, no, no, like this state of practice that makes you better.
It's the opposite of flow, right and flow you lose track of time. When you're practicing like that professional guitar player, you know every second that passes by because it's like incredibly difficult like what you're doing your mind is rebelling, it's not natural, you know, it's not fun.
It's not the skier going down the hill and it's all instinct, it's you it's all you thinking about exactly what you're trying to do. And so, you know, I began to push this point out here is like it's not all about flow like actually getting better at things is really painful sometimes deliberate practice is not the same as flow.
And there's a lot of fights about this for a while. I think there was a lot of flow advocates that just wanted life to be flow all the time.
But I think Anders was right because I watched these professionals practice like that's what it is. It's not fun. Well, everything we know about neuroplasticity, which of course is the nervous system's ability to change in response to experience says that there needs to be some
neurochemical or electrical condition that changes in the nervous system in order to queue up plasticity. And to my knowledge, one of the most robust of those is the release of the so called catacolomines dopamine epinephrine nor epinephrine dopamine because it's involved in so many things can be a little bit of a distractor.
So let's just say epinephrine nor epinephrine adrenaline or adrenaline create in the body and mine to some extent a state of alertness and often a state of agitation.
But if you think about it in the absence of some neuromodulators like those that change the conditions for wiring of neurons, you know, everyone loves fire together wire together.
Beautiful statement by Carla Shatz, not Donald, have Dr. Carla Shatz said that not Donald have. But why would neurons need to change their patterns of connectivity if you can complete the operation the nervous system needs to.
It doesn't feel discomfort. It creates discomfort, but the nervous system needs a queue to that. Okay, this is different. I'm failing. And it's the failures that actually trigger the plasticity is the discomfort that queues that conditions are different.
Now, otherwise there's simply no reason to devote energetic resources to rewiring neurons. And I feel like we don't learn this one where kids we.
And I think as kids, we can learn so much without that feeling of agitation. We get into these modes of looking for flow.
And I have respect for the research on flow and the people who are balled in by like to talk about flow a little bit. The only thing I really know about flow for sure is that backwards it spells wolf.
So one of flow it's such an attractive idea right is like Star Wars. It's like you have the force and you're doing things without thinking and awesome.
But I can't flow myself through a paper and extract the critical data. I can't create a podcast in flow. But when it's done, it feels great.
Especially if you nailed the key metrics. So what do you think about flow? I'm not trying to beat up on it. I just want to understand how you place it in the framework of learning and deep work if it belongs there at all.
It doesn't have a big place in it in the deep work framework. And this was what the controversy was for a while. And I knew my Haley a little bit like we corresponded some I knew Anders a little bit like we corresponded some so I sort of felt like I was.
And both of them actually tragically have died in the last three or four years, I think. Yeah, I think both recently.
Flow doesn't play a big role in the deep work framework. So when I was trying to justify deep work. So why focusing without distraction was important.
I was drawing a lot more for Anders work, right, because why is focusing without distraction important. Well, you have to quiet the neural circuitries you can isolate the circuit that's actually relevant to the thing that you're doing right.
You're not going to get better at something if you have noisy circuitry. This is and that requires a really intense concentration. So it was one of the big advantages of deep work.
If you're used to that cognitive state, you're going to learn things faster. And I think it was all on the earth to understand why. So if you're not distracted, I'm really focusing hard on what I'm doing trying to learn this new thing.
You're giving the right mental conditions, but it's not a flow state. I always used to say, okay, when you're when your deep work is not flow.
Because of this, like a lot of deep work is you're trying to do something that is beyond your comfort zone. And that's going to be difficult. That's a state of deliberate practice.
And there's a famous paper about this where Anders actually explicitly says deliberate practice and flow are very different.
And I wrote an essay years ago called the father of deliberate practice, disowns flow. And again, people are really flow partisans out there. It's interesting. I think people just like the idea, because it feels good.
But I mean, flow is the feeling of performance is the way I think about it. It's really hard to train for certain sports. But then when you're actually performing, you're in the game, you can fall in the flow. Right.
Because then everything is on. It's really hard to train guitar. But like when you're performing in front of a big crowd, you probably maybe fall in the flow. Maybe you don't, but you could, right.
But it's a performance state, not the practicing getting better state. So, you know, to me, flow has like very little role in how I think about what I do as a cognitive professional. It's just not something that comes up that often.
I agree that we learn through focused work and that flow does manifest itself during performance. And sometimes so much so that people exhibit virtuosity is the surprising themselves even at what's in there.
I always think of it's what is unskilled skilled mastery virtuosity virtuosity seems to incorporate some random elements of maybe even the performer has not done that before and they surprise themselves or something like that. Who knows? These are words for for something that isn't easily quantified in the first place.
But in terms of deep work and getting a little bit back to kind of practical steps towards deep work. I also have to ask you because I didn't earlier when you are on your laptop in your library with your fireplace and these books. It's a beautiful image actually that you drawn for us in our minds is the Wi-Fi connection to your computer activated or you offline.
It's connected because it doesn't really matter to me, you know, because what is it what's drawing my attention. I mean the most important decision I think I made technically speaking to be a cognitive worker is I didn't lack a social media.
I think we underestimate the degree to which our problem with digital distraction is not the internet is not our phones it is specific products and services that are engineered at great expense the pull you back to them when you take that away the Internet is not that interesting.
I don't have a cycle of sites to go to you know I can check my email but I don't really know where else to go I'm going to go to the New York Times I guess but then you've seen the articles right they change it once a day there's just not much I've set things up so there's not much that's that interesting to me.
We've all heard of FOMO fear of missing out I feel like there's the other thing which is fear of missing something bad right so like an anxiety a more primitive anxiety within us that if we are not engaged on social media or looking at our phone often or texting often that it's not that we'll miss the party will miss the emergency.
You don't seem to suffer from those kind of everyday is yeah I mean it doesn't happen that much I have a phone you know a standard no I have my phone I guess I'm working away from it yeah I guess it's true if there's an emergency.
But this was the case for a very long time right we didn't have smartphones till really relatively recently this is you know 15 years ago so we were just used to this until yesterday essentially that there's just periods of time where you're out of touch like you're at a restaurant with someone.
You're out of touch until you get back to your office like we're okay you know we weren't plagued by emergencies that that led to disastrous results because we couldn't hear about it right then go to the movies like you're out of touch right and be a couple hours so you're in touch again and so I you know it's not something that's affected me as much so maybe I'm working without my phone nearby.
A lot of people have this response they begin sort of catastrophizing like what if this happens or this or that and I'm thinking you know I survived before that my parent survived without that my my grandparents survived without that I don't worry about it as much you know and some of this maybe is just this isn't upset people as much as it used to the fact I don't use a lot of these apps are my phone.
But it really does upset people right there's well what about this what about that what about this and I don't know how much of this is just maybe I'm oblivious and how much of this is people back sliding explanation for why they do need their phone why they do need to look at all the time but I I get a lot of it you know maybe they're upset and you don't know because you're not looking at your phone that's right.
I hate I'll tell you what that's a blessing not knowing how upset people are at you yeah it's a blessing is a semi public figure I'll tell you that.
Yeah I can comment on that but I won't I am on social media and I do enjoy it as I've got started posting on Instagram and then expanded to other platforms including the podcast but there's a threshold beyond which it becomes counterproductive for sure I think there's information there like questions that people ask are often informative it's sort of like a nigma class and asking are there any questions sometimes the comments that people bring back are truly informative towards.
I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I
think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think
I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I
I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I
I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I
think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think
I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I
I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I
I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I
think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think
I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I
think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think
I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I
I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I
I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I
I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I think I
I'm doing it pretty well now I'm done you know why just didn't even take that long so I mean I think people underestimate what's going on here I'd like to take a quick break to acknowledge our sponsor element elements is an
electrolyte drink that has everything you need and nothing you don't that means zero sugar and the appropriate ratios of the electrolyte sodium magnesium and potassium and that
correct ratio of electrolytes is extremely important because every cell in your body but especially your nerve cells your neurons relies on
electrolytes in order to function properly so when you're well hydrated and you have the appropriate amount of electrolytes in your
system your mental functioning and your physical functioning is improved I drink one packet of element dissolved in about 16 to 32
ounces of water when I wake up in the morning as well as while I exercise and if I've sweat a lot during that
exercise I often will drink a third element packet dissolved in about 32 ounces of water after I exercise element
comes in a variety of different flavors all of which I find really tasty I like the citrus I like the watermelon I like the raspberry frankly I
can't pick just one it also comes in chocolate and chocolate mint which I find tastes best if they are put into water dissolved and then heated up I
tend to do that in the winter months because of course you don't just need hydration on hot days and in the summer and spring
months but also in the winter when the temperatures are cold and the environment tends to be dry if you'd like to try
element you can go to drink elements spelled LMNT dot com slash huberman to try a free sample pack again that's drink element dot com slash
huberman yeah would like to drill into the concept of context and task switching a bit more I do think that the brain has
something akin to a transmission system where you know for people that drive and have driven you know the the amount of energy that
needs to be used in order to accelerate a vehicle to get up to a you know higher gear it's very different than the equal amount of
increase in speed at a given gear right so it's sort of that this is you hear this if you're not familiar with transmission so that it sounds like
mmm it sounds as if there's it's more facile at higher speeds well how could it be that you're burning less fuel at higher speed it's not
exactly that way but but I think the brain has these sort of transmission systems and what you're describing with
um people switching back and forth and checking email and phone etc and back to the work um that should be at hand
is sort of akin to going up and down the the gear system constantly yeah trying to arrive at a given destination and sure you might
arrive but you're going to burn far more fuel it's the least efficient way to go about it you want to get into that deep
groove and I think when we hear about flow I feel like at least for me that's the sort of notion of flow that I'm
looking for dropping into that deep groove even if there's some friction within that groove of the the challenge of
the work that I'm doing it's about not thinking about anything else it's really about focus yep right and the word flow is just a
wonderfully attractive word um that I think gives us the the false impression that we can just drop into things like a
square wave function sit down pen and paper yeah go and there's no possible way that neural circuits can work that way
no we let's let's invent a term and I'm you're telling the term extends I'm a bit on the fly but uh
neurosimantic coherence this is going to be my alternative term for flow when you're working on something
hard uh it's not that you're in an actual flow state where you lose track what you're doing you're
concentrating really hard but I'm why I'm saying neurosimantic coherence is you get to this place where
the sort of relevant semantic neural networks are all um those that are activated are all relevant to what
you're doing and you've uh over time inhibited most of the unrelated networks that were fired up before
and so you get in this sense of it's hard maybe I'm not losing track of time but like I'm all focused on
this you know I'm grappling with the the bear here the the math equation the the book chapter whatever
it is um and so it's something different than flow but it's also different than linda stone had
the term partial continuous attention which is what you're that cognitive disaster of I'm constantly
networks switching back and forth so we'll call it neurosimantic coherence I get to coin that
term um because it's uh you have this coherence of the semantic neural networks on what you're doing
and that's the feeling of I'm getting after this hard problem and it might be really hard to do I
mean I know the feeling of trying to solve a math proof for me for example could be so difficult
because I mean what does it actually feel like in your head when you're solving a math proof it's
a lot of you hold this here and then you try to get to the next step by doing this and it doesn't
work but you have to keep holding this here it takes a lot of concentration okay let me try this
that didn't work either but this look promising okay so now I need to go back and in my mind's
I update this setup and now let me try this so it's a lot of holding things in your working memory
and keeping them loaded while you try an extension and then evaluating how that worked without and so
it it requires um you just internal concentration which isn't pleasant but in neurosimatic coherence
it's all this happening in your world you know is that in that proof so maybe that's what we should be
pitching what people should be looking for is yeah forget flow but also remember like this default
where you're like the rescue time data set participants checking email once every five minutes
that's cognitive nonsense that's crazy that's like you're trying to you know play football and you're
covering over one of your eyes and wearing like a 50 pound rucksack on you're just like
handicapping your abilities here for no reason right so what's in between is this idea and that
requires focus you know requires deep work you know we're playing football and then every three
downs or so running into the stands and having a conversation trying to work out something challenging
with your spouse or whatever and then going back and trying to totally give her a play set right
every risk of throwing in too many analogies and stories I'll just briefly say I went and saw
that the play in New York with my sister this year I think it was Harry Potter and the cursed
child or something like that I didn't really enjoy the play that much but the set stuff was amazing
and they have this magic library I think is very very relevant here where essentially the book that
you open has a certain topic I don't know me it spells or something is Harry Potter again fun show
but great set stuff didn't really resonate with me too much in any event and then the books around
it change their topic that but are related to that central book and then if you look at one particular
thing like maybe it's potions or something I'm making this up and then all of a sudden that the
the books the books around it change they become either more specific there might be a distant but
related idea that could lend itself to creativity so sort of that's the way the brain works in cognition
is that we get into a frame of of a certain discussion or a certain theme and the books on the
shelf change according to their relatedness based on memory of past what's going on now in plans
for the future I think anytime we look at we change context and we look at you know a raccoon video
on Instagram or our calendar and oh there's that thing the books become very scatters so when
we return to it there's a lot more friction a lot more work or neural neural energy required to get
back into that this narrow states of cognition just that exactly explains sort of my experience in
the way I think about it yeah yeah because you're it takes time to load up the sort of relevant
the secondary interciary semantic ideas and now they're there so like you can pull from them and
then as you shift you have to sort of shift this whole thing around that takes a lot of concentration
I mean I wrote this this article once that got me a little bit of trouble might not not trouble
but mild trouble but it was it was called for the Chronicle Higher Education and the title they gave
it was is email making professor stupid which wasn't my title you basically called every every
one of your colleagues stupid I got all checking the dean at the time did call me in for lunch but
actually he was here's the thing he was like hey this is real I agree with this but what I was
arguing actually in that article essentially was what do we do at a university is a person what
we're supposed to be doing is trying to teach what the life of the mind is and how that works
and we've kind of forgotten that so we like why we should maybe think about like at universities we
need to be explicitly not just teaching how to think but also modeling the life of the mind at
the at the highest level and so this idea that we just allow the the professor's area to to be
drowned in emails and and tasks and be it distracted you know it's the main war that every research
professor has is how do I how do I fight the admin overload until I become famous enough to get
an assistant right like this is the big problem and I was making this proposal of university should
be the citadel's a concentration it's if you want to get the the best academics in the world
to university just tell them here's at the top of our contract you will not be assigned an email
address like you're going to get Nobel laureates coming from you know all over the country to come to
this place and so I was making this argument we should think a lot more about thinking we should
talk more about it we should model it exactly the type of things you're talking about but we don't
it's much more contents focus but really this should be something more that we we get into specifically
like this is how you actually use the mind to produce innovative interesting high value new cognitive
artifacts this is a very hard thing we're asking you to do but you can apprentice here because this
is what we do and we've mastered we're going to teach you how to do it but we never have that sort
of meta conversation sort of meta cognition conversation I've always thought that'd be important I
think you'd have much better outcomes if that's part of what you learned at the university
was how to take the thing in your head and really put it to work you know really extract out of
it as capabilities or even high school or even elementary school level I agree yeah you have kids
yeah and do they have smartphones no yeah how do they feel about that well I mean they're not
they're not old enough yet that it's a it's a real problem but they're they're not going to be
happy with me probably soon hate me now love me later as my mother used to say basically because I
you know I'm I'm convinced having spent some time thinking about this writing about this doing
some journalism on this talking to a lot of the experts that like I think we're going to end up
where all the the arrows from the the relevant social psych research which I've been following
this research since you know 2017 this 2017 is roughly when you see the first warning signs going
up that we need to worry about the potential mental health impacts of these tools especially
social meeting smartphones on young people and I you can track this right now I have a talk I
actually gave them my kids school do I have to be about this where I tracked how this research evolved
and you know like any literature is it's contentious at first and then you see you begin to see
a conciliance between different lines of evidence and I think we're everything now in the last
couple of years is starting to come together this idea if we don't really know if this is bad or
not I think that's just an old take the research has moved past that and I think where we're we're
landing on is unrestricted internet use pre puberty is risky and like the new standard is going to
be post puberty is probably the right time to be given a device that gives you unrestricted access
we're talking like 16 is probably the appropriate age so this does not make me popular at the middle
school where my son my old son's about to go I think in two or three years that's just going to
be common sense this is the direction I see the research literature and the advocacy going and I
think there's a solid ground for this because you're a computer scientist I can ask this question
what about video games I'm not a big consumer of video games it's been years since I've played one
in fact but video games are so very different than smartphones and other technologies because they
seem to put at least the kids I've observed playing them and adults into a very narrow
trench of attention yeah I mean there are definitely issues with it I mean look I'm not a
social psychologist I just sort of play one in my articles but but I've looked into this literature
a lot there's a bit of a gendered breakdown that has a lot of overlaps where when they're looking
at potential harms of these technologies young adolescents right pre adolescent young adolescents
you tend to see social media there be more signal for cognitive distress for young women and
girls and the video games to actually be the bigger culprit for young men and boys right there is
a bit of a difference here because with the social media impact the the content of what's
happening matters in this picture right so so what I'm seeing the engagement I'm having how this
impacts my social life this is part of the mental distress with video games it seems to be more
an impact of just disharmonious passion and obsession just the time it takes right because the
games can be incredibly addictive so the problem that young men are having are just they're playing
it all the time that I'm staying up late because I have an iPad in my room and I'm 14 and I'm going
to play Fortnite until three in the morning because my brain cannot handle like what you're what
you're giving me here right so it's less of a a content concern than it is just a time concern right
that seems more solvable to me you know like my solution with my own kids I don't mind
be a game I'm a computer scientist but I said nothing that's online right nothing that was free
because if it was free that means their business model involves getting you to play it all the time
so you can upcharge or whatever they have an Nintendo switches like I like Nintendo okay Nintendo
switch here's a $60 L the game that someone spent five years making or whatever you can only play
those games so long at a time before you know you're tired you come back to it they don't have an
addictive response to it if they get an iPad with a game on it they'll just like play that
till their eyes bleed because those are meant to be is it to be addictive so I'm wary about video
games but there it's all just a usage game so you stick away from the more addictive games it's
a much easier problem to solve I think than the social media the social media issue earlier you
talked about books I still read hardcover and paperback books what are your thoughts on audio books
and learning by way of audio book versus paper in front of you flipping a physical device or
kindles I don't know if there's any real research on this I've seen a little bit but I'm curious what
you've encountered and what your thoughts are as well you could speculate yeah I mean I'll tell
you personally I can only do fiction in audiobooks right because when I'm in a nonfiction experience
I'm just very used to constantly looking for connections and ideas you know and so I have to be
able to slow down and then speed up and then go back to something I just read so I really have a
distressing experience trying to listen to nonfiction audiobooks fiction's fine that's great
we'll put a thriller on it you know audible great you know listen through it and I think some of
this might be particular to my my engagement with books which is I'm you know I'm a writer and a
thinker so I'm constantly looking for ideas and so I might have a different engagement with a
nonfiction book and someone you know just listening to one of my books but I can only do fiction on audio
that makes sense thinking about what works for me what doesn't I agree I love stories and
a fiction by by audiobook you ideally consumed on a long drive or a hike but nonfiction requires
that I take notes and see things in their kind of respective spatial layout and yeah in your
most recent book you describe this concept of pseudo productivity is pseudo productivity a general
term to refer to some of the things we've already talked about this task switching context switching
or pseudo productivity something that includes other categories of limiting ourselves as well
I mean I think it's more specific than that right so it to me sort of productivity was the answer
that we came up with a knowledge work to a real dilemma which is that's a sector you know using
your brain primarily to create value that's a sector that emerged as a major part of the economy
in roughly the mid 20th century when that emerged all the definitions of productivity that we had
were inspired from agriculture and industry right so so in agriculture we can have ratios
bushels of corn per whatever acres of land under cultivation and industrial
manufacturing we have ratios model teas per input labor hour so you could just measure these
things we also had clearly defined systems of production so you could then say if I change this
about the system of production what happens to this number and you could do gradient descent right
okay I do this that number goes down let's not do that but I make this change it goes up that's
a better way of building it like this was the dominant way of thinking about productivity since
basically Adam Smith the knowledge workerizes that doesn't work right because I'm working on whatever
five different things it's different than what you were working on how I'm managing my work is
entirely off you skated right in knowledge work organizational ideas is entirely left up to the
individual how you manage your work and your workload and collaboration that's like up to you
that's all off you skated there's no number to measure there's no system to improve so I think it
was a real quandary my argument is what essentially the management class came up with the
shooter productivity which is okay and the absence of being able to be quantitative about this
we will use visible activity as a proxy for useful effort so that's it like we see you doing things
that's better than not the more we see you doing the better I call that shooter productivity and I
think that's implicitly how we've been organizing the management of knowledge work labor since the 1950s
and we say visibility at people doing things this is the conflating of busyness with actual
productivity yes and so the problem came when we had this a general way of measuring approximating
productive effort which wasn't very good but whatever right I mean I want to see you're at the
office and you're doing things the problem was the front office IT revolution right because I'm
I'm essentially a technocratic I see everything through the lens of technology am I writing
we got computers we got networks we got email shooter productivity can't be sustainable in that
context because now with something like email then later tools like slack I can demonstrate effort
at a very fine grain right because I can send an email respond to this jump onto a slack conversation
I can now do that at a very fine grain level and essentially everywhere and anywhere
all throughout my day I can be demonstrating labor at home I can be demonstrating labor because we
have mobile computing we get the smartphone revolution so there's there's now an ability to
constantly be demonstrating effort at all points of our day and that's where I think the wheels came
off the bus right and and led to this this this point that got worse and worse starting the early
2000s and hit ahead in the pandemic of knowledge worker burnout knowledge worker exhaustion and nihilism
of like what's going on with my job like all I do is zoom all day what's happening I think that
shooter productivity plus front office IT revolution they did not play nice together and you can see
this by the way if you look even at productivity books you see this huge shift that happens early 90s
versus early 2000s it's like a completely shift in tone right early 90s it's Stephen Covey is
very optimistic it's like how are we going to self-actualize and like carefully choose the most
meaningful activities to fulfill all of our dreams for all of our roles early 2000s now we have email
you have David Allen there's like oh my god we're so overwhelmed with task all we can hope for is
like these little moments of zin in the day if we can just automate how we're just churning through
these widgets at least we can find some cognitive piece what happened in those 10 years was the front
office IT revolution and now we just felt like we had to constantly be demonstrating that visible
effort so you know I think that's where we got to the problem shooter productivity plus technology
recently my podcast team was in Australia and my producer and close friend here Rob Moore instructed
all of us to get rid of social media on our phones except one guy who would post our weekly episodes
announcements and it was pretty brutal at first and then coming back to social media as it
actually turned out to be more challenging you really experienced the friction coming back
the other way and then one experiences the lack of friction and that's where it gets scary it's
so interesting the way that the brain can adapt the friction leaving something behind the friction
coming back to it and I think for people listening to this I raised this because I think of course
many people listening are you know have work that they really need to focus on they may be having
issues with productivity and burnout etc I think a lot of people use the phone and social media because
it fills their life you know it provides some enrichment and they aren't necessarily committed
to specific projects but I guess through the lens of the let's just call it the Cal New Portee
and Lens one might argue that those people almost certainly have untapped creativity untapped
resources within them that they don't yet know about because they're essentially using that energy
elsewhere yeah I mean I think for a lot of people it's papering over the void right you have
this void in your life because there's a unmet potential unmet interest living in misalignment with
the things you care about right I mean a lot of people this is the classic sort of catastrophe of
life right social media and there's before this it was other things right there's other intoxicants
or other sorts of distractions it's a way for some people of essentially putting a screen over
that like gaping void and it like just makes it bearable enough that you can kind of go on with
life and so it is true if you just rip it out you see the void and that's really difficult right
I mean because I did this experiment for one of my books I ran an experiment with 1600 people
and they all turned off all their social media for 30 days 30 days right these are young people
old people a whole mix a whole mix right not just university students I recruited them from my
my newsletter readership so they weren't university students and it wasn't formal research it was
you know I put out the call right so this is not randomly sampled right but I put out the call
and I said here I'm gonna walk you walk you through this and then I got a lot of information back
so people reported back how it went and this was like the number one thing I heard was it's really
hard at first right and so who were the people that succeeded for 30 days versus those who
did it the ones who didn't succeeded tended to just try to white knuckle it just be like I don't
like how much I'm using social media I'm just gonna stop because it's bad and I don't want to do
a bad thing I'm just gonna like you know hold on to tables white knuckles they want it make it 30 days
the people who did succeed followed my advice to incredibly aggressively pursue alternatives in those
30 days so it's like go learn new hobbies join things right away get like really structured about
your day get into exercise again learn how to knit again a lot of people said oh I learned about
I forgot how fun libraries were like you can go into this building and like all the books are free
and there's there you could just grab whatever and it's okay if you don't like the book because
you didn't have to pay for it I'm going out with friends again I'm okay every week I'm gonna have
you know we're gonna have drinks with this person and every Thursday morning I'm gonna go running
with this person the people who aggressively tried to put in place a more positive alternative
through self-reflection experimentation they lasted to 30 days and beyond right and so then I
came to realize like oh I see what's happening here is you have these unmet needs these tools can
give you sort of a simulacrum of meeting them I need I'm a social bean I need to be connected to
people well I'm texting and like doing comments on social media it sort of touches that a little
bit just enough that you don't feel hopelessly lonely but it's not really fulfilling that I have a
need to like see my intentions made manifest concretely in the world humans want to do this well I'm
you know posting these things and people are responding it's sort of this simulacrum of real creation
so it's like kind of satisfying that just enough that it's not just intolerable right and so what
happens and if you remove that you have to actually fill those things the right way so now I'm not
socializing on social media but I'm going out of my way to sacrifice time and attention on
behalf of other people I'm feeling a social void in the right way now I don't really feel like I need
to go back I'm actually build making my intentions manifest I'm learning skills and building things
now this sort of pseudo construction and collective attention economy of social media post this and
you'll like it I'm like this I don't need that anymore to fill that void so it's like you have to
fill the void first so so you know five years ago I wrote a book that was about reforming this
part of your life and a lot of the book was had nothing to do with technology but about how to
actually just rebuild parts of your life and on my podcast honestly like one of the big topics
we talk about which is crazy that I'm a technologist and I write about trying to find focus in
a distracted world is this thing we call the deep life which is just straight up building a meaningful
life 101 and it's like crazy that my podcast is talking about it but on the other hand it's not
because my it's the podcast people go to when they're fed up with the digital world and it turns out
if you don't get the analog world working right for you you need something to avoid starting to
avoid and send the digital world will do that well enough it's like just good enough to keep life
tolerable there's a lot of discussion nowadays about ADHD attention deficit hyperactivity disorder
sometimes minus the H minus the hyperactivity a lot of kids have true clinically diagnosed ADHD so
we want to be um sensitive to that's a real issue for a lot of people a lot of adults have true ADHD
but nowadays people talk about ADHD the same way terms like depression trauma gas lighting and um
et cetera are discussing in nonclinical territory yeah we do you know technically as well right
right and um and I'm not disparaging that it's just that we we have sort of a dilution of
deeper understanding of what these things really are and aren't um what are your thoughts I realize
you're not a psychiatrist but what are your thoughts on the idea that um many people that think they
perhaps have true attention issues have either um built those attention issues through neuroplasticity
into their system meaning their system probably work nervous system probably worked pretty well
to focus but they engaged in enough task switching that the circuits of the brain involved in cognition
became optimized for um this very distributed cognition um as opposed to um neuro focused attention
and what are your thoughts about um just the amount of stimulant use on college campuses and in
in adult populations to to try and overcome this I feel like there's a lot of attempts to use
pharmacology to match the level of distraction to try and make that distraction not seem like
distraction um but what you know this is uh this is an area I hear a lot about given the nature of
the things I cover on the podcast I think a lot of these issues are phone induced right um and I
think the problem is yeah not solvable as much you don't need pills you need a different phone
relationship my optimistic hypothesis is again this uh nonclinical uh difficulty with maintaining
attention like in your work or if you're a college student or whatever um it's not necessarily
representing sort of knock on wood like a wholesale neural rewiring like the I basically rewired my
circuits on my brain to be a sort of distributed switching processor I think most of this is persisting
in that much more malleable area that gets affected by moderate behavioral addictions right so the
the we have parts of the brain that are part of these like feedback reward loops that's meant to be
malleable right I mean this is supposed to be so we can have really rapid learning about what's
happening in our environment and how we're supposed to respond to it and then this is what gets
hijacked when you you build up these behavioral addictions and so it's it's very quick to change
um but that malleability means you can change it back right so so I I think this this drive
do I have to keep checking my email or my phone is again you build up a moderate behavioral addiction
because of like standard reward cues and and that's a part of the brain that you can't it's difficult
but it's not your whole brain is now a social media brain and that's just the brain you have because
you're exposed to this it's a matter of you know getting this stimuli out of your life doing the same
type of training you would do uh extboard them exposure like it used to the idea of feeling that
drive and not actually doing it you can work with blocking apps like there's stuff you can do this
is sort of like standard it's painful it takes two months and then like you're doing better on it
so I do think we have a a large stratum of subclinical attention issues that are not representing
wholesale neural rewiring but are like absolutely sort of expected outcomes of working with
malleable reward cue circuits in the brain we can fix those just like we can if you know you're
you're gambling too much or compulsively eating the junk food or something we don't say your whole
brain got we rired for junk food it's like no you have this this particular cue cycle that we
have to work on so maybe I'm being optimistic there and you know the brain better but like
it would be extraordinary if in like a 10 year period right your entire brain somehow got
rewired in a way that it couldn't sustain focus anymore I totally agree with that statement
unless you're a young person and you grew up in a distracted world and your brain optimized
as the young brain does for the conditions it's in and then I think you have a real issue
yeah which is not to say it can't be rescued through the use of discipline tools protocols
pharmacology nutrition great sleep and if necessary prescription drugs right because there is a
case for prescription drugs in certain instances for ADHD and as I understand it you know any time
people say wait aren't those drugs just math isn't it just speed yep they are in vitamins in most
cases and the idea is to increase the deployment of certain certain neuromodulators once I mentioned
before as it means to induce neuroplasticity so that the focus state becomes more of a default state
so I think that young people are in trouble I think that we I do worry about young people I think
we've it's it's akin to putting them in a kind of a well we know this in the visual system if
you take an animal or human and you put them into an altered visual environment the visual
system changes in your perception of the visual world is becomes inaccurate and the way I think of
this cognitively with respect to attention the analogy would be I think we've been for the last
10 years or so 10 15 years we've been raising kids in a sort of house of fun house mirror things
which is anything but fun where you look at yourself and your legs are shorter than in your
torso is long and so everywhere you turn you're getting a distorted perception and trying to navigate
the world through that distorted perception is very very difficult you can do it but it's a lot
of extra work that's what I feel we've done to young people I'm very concerned about that as well
yeah yeah and and I think I don't know what you're taking on this but like do you think
at the undergraduate level that we have just been not explicitly but just sort of implicitly
professors in general we have been just sort of slowly adapting the difficulty of what we're
teaching etc because we maybe there's a reduced cognitive focus capacity which is like the
the key skill for this sort of very artificial thing of learning you know complicated college
level work I think this would be an interesting experiment to find out is have we been implicitly
having to sort of simplify things to keep roughly speaking grade distributions were normatively
we feel comfortable I mean do we see this signal yet that's my interest do we see this signal yet
if we look back a generation 20 years ago versus now I don't know for courses of the sort that I
teach or taught until very recently I still teach but I was directing the neuroanatomy course and
there's a laboratory module so the students dissect brains they're holding actual human brains
that's a real physical contact that cannot be recapitulated digitally you just can't do it you can
try use VR but it ain't the same I mean how would you like it if your neurosurgeon learned
on a virtual brain and then it does surgery on a brain no not no such thing should happen I think that
my experience with this is perhaps most relevant with respect to social media where I teach neuroscience
and I use a variety of duration of clips you know the 90 second real the you know seven minute
thing the two and a half hour podcast that you know we have podcast solo podcast of four and a
half hours I don't know how many people listen start to finish but I think having a variety of
different durations really helps and I'm told by my team I have a tiktok account although I've
never logged on there you know I think tiktok represents the extreme of kind of bubble gum level
information slash entertainment and they really nailed some some circuit that can handle
information of about 30 to 60 seconds in a format that tickles the brain just right to keep swiping
liking commenting and sharing yeah and I don't think that's anything like a real understanding
or education yeah I mean it's is nothing like a real understanding or education yeah I mean tiktok
in particular like I think something people what people get wrong about tiktok is they think
that there was a real algorithmic innovation which is actually not the case like as far as I
understand the machine learning algorithm underneath tiktok is probably like a relatively standard sort
of multi-arm band-ent you know intermittent feedback reinforcement algorithm all they do is they
clear out all the other noise so you know if you're Facebook or something like this you're trying
to use algorithms to curate things but you have all these other legacy structures you also have to
try to satisfy there's friends and you know you want to show stuff that your friends like more than
other people and there's groups you're joining tiktok just got rid of all the noise and so we're
just going to all we're doing is optimizing watch time to we think we don't know but we think watch
time is the main thing that they're they're optimizing so we want to optimize it watch time and everything
all these videos all just exist as multi-dimensional points in this sort of semantic cloud and all we're
doing is just showing you things and then you swipe another thing swipe another thing so when you
get rid of all the noise from machine learning algorithm it doesn't also have to satisfy that I
follow this person on Instagram or this is my friend all I have to do is optimize this one number
how long did they walk before they swipe it just turns out like oh it's really easy like you do
that for a couple hours you're going to hone in on these sub regions in this massive multi-dimensional
space of stuff that just tickles this particular person's brain you know and it's very cybernetic
because now I'm the user of tiktok I'm the content creator I'm getting immediate feedback what's
working what's not I really quickly find these particularly rich regions in this sort of cybernetic
space and so it's like tiktok just purified something that was simple basic machine learning but
just like purify what we're doing here and that turned out to be enough to create what's like
probably the most addictive force we've seen in the digital world in a long time so tiktok
is optimized for dwell time yeah that's the thought right because it's not public so like we don't
exactly know how the algorithm works but people have been studying it like a Skinnerbox you know
100 phones and we we're looking at all these accounts look into variables it seems like that's
largely what it's optimizing for is how long did you watch before you swiped right and that's it so
that there I mean it's not this was both what was smart about tiktok and also why I've been arguing
it's it's destabilized a whole traditional social media narrative is because the traditional
massive social media players of the last decade had this first mover advantage on these giant
actual social networks right so like Twitter and Facebook and Instagram had these massive networks
of people's preferences of I'm following this person and this person I'm following and they
could leverage these actual social graphs as a huge source of producing interesting content right
and this was a huge first mover advantage because you can't it's hard to get 100 million people to
use something now right tiktok got rid of all that we don't want a social graph us a user don't
have to declare anything you don't have to follow people or say who your friends are we'll just
start showing you things and that was more compelling than what you could generate with a social
graph but now there's no first mover advantage so as the big social media players follow the tiktok
model which is much more algorithmic let's just try to curate based on algorithms not who you follow
or who your friends are they're now much more vulnerable because tiktok could come along and do
this without having to spend five years getting people to clear their friends and now if someone
else could come along and do this so I think the major players are giving away their competitive advantage
which is this the social graph IP that no one will ever replicate again they're giving away that
advantage and now it's a free-for-all-plane field of all sources of attention engagement so I don't
know I think tiktok accidentally destabilized the social media decade that had been defining until
I think just recently what I find so interesting about social media platforms like tiktok is that
sure it makes sense that kids and teens would use it they were raised with it snapchat etc but when
I see my peers who you know we call ourselves adults people in their mid to late 40s 50s essentially
playing kids games or engaging through these platforms that are and they're not childlike
necessarily but they they just prove that the or rather that their adherence slash addiction to
them just proves that this is tapping into some core neural circuit that exists in everyone
so while it might be shaping the young grain a lot this is adults basically eating junk food all day
yeah which raises a question you know I think while there are many different ways to eat and
that's not a topic we want to get into now Lord knows that's a great way to create a lot of social media
content debating which diet omnivore, carnivore, vegan etc the notion of intermittent fasting
limiting ones portion of the day where they eat to whatever six hours four hours 12 hours
um is an interesting one that maybe has some applicability here um what are your thoughts about
simply not turning on the phone maybe even not turning Wi-Fi on if people are are not as disciplined
as you are with the laptop or tablet um for the first two hours of the day or four hours of the day
or for a portion of the day sort of like you're taking a social media fast that isn't 30 days it's
you know which I think for a lot of people is going to evoke um high cortisol release uh just the
idea of it yeah uh now this is an idea I've written about before you know in deep work I had this
chapter called embrace boredom that was the entire idea right so the idea was um boredom by itself
is not I think laudable right there's a reason why it feels distressing when things feel distressing
that's usually an evolutionary signal that there's something going on here but what I was arguing in
that chapter was exactly what you're talking about you should have some moments every day where
you're free from distraction even though you could be accessing distraction and you want to
and like a little bit each day 20 minutes each day and then maybe a longer session once a week
like a couple hours um my argument for that was it's about breaking a pevelovian connection in
this sense right so if it's every time I feel bored I'm lack of novel stimuli I get this release of
the phone your mind is really going to make that association of like this is what we always do if
sometimes you don't it's a different cognitive landscape right your mind is uh sometimes we get
the distraction sometimes we don't that's a much better place to be because now when it comes time
to actually focus on something you know your mind's like I've been here before like we don't always
get the distraction so you know it isn't going back you know early 20th century psychology there's
probably a more neuroscientific way to think about this but it's like breaking pevelovian loops
if like sometimes we at the end of the day I'm exhausted it's an Instagram time and it like
scratches an itch but other times I'm bored I'm in line with the pharmacy and I don't look at the
phone my brain learns like yeah we don't always do it and and so the idea is that you know if you
make boredom more tolerable then you're much more likely to succeed with doing things that are
boring but hard and I think deep work for example is boring it just in the clinical sense of there's
lack of novel stimuli you're just doing the same thing for a long time so I've always advocated
for that is like you shouldn't be unsuperon comfortable with boredom like don't go seeking it
I'm not a big believer of and boredom is where all creative insight comes from I think it's a strong
evolutionary cue like leave this state but you do have to have some tolerance for it I wonder if
we need a different word than boredom um are you familiar with this notion of gap effects in learning
these gap effects are similar to the effects of um neural processing during sleep um focused
attention with some agitation triggers neuroplasticity and learning but it's during sleep in particular
deep sleep rapid eye movement sleep states of deep brass maybe in some forms of meditation that the
actual rewiring takes place and then there's this literature about gap effects which have been
demonstrated for music from math for many things in which if people say are practicing new scales on
the piano for instance but to be any scale and then they um intermittently are are queued by a
buzzer to just stop and do nothing the the hippocampus which is involved in learning memory
replays the action sometimes in reverse just as it occurs during sleep um at a rate of maybe 20 or
30 times faster at the neural level we're not talking about boredom what we're talking about
it's pauses during which perhaps um we are obtaining accelerated neuroplasticity the gap effects
certainly accelerate learning I've talked about these in other podcasts but I wonder whether
not this thing you're calling boredom so being in line um to get some groceries yeah and not
taking one's phone out while the checker is just getting the groceries through and just not really
doing much of anything it's entirely possible that the thing that we were working on earlier that
day or the previous day is being processed in the hippocampus at an unconscious level at a much
more rapid rate where we to look at our phone we would inhibit those gap effects which are
truly beneficial yeah well I mean professors feel this all the time right at least a lot of ones
I've talked to with peer reviews so I don't know if you've had this experience but you're like
reviewing a paper I often have this experience where when I'm first engaging with the paper I feel
incredibly frustrated okay I don't quite understand what they're doing here like this mathematics
isn't quite making sense to me and it'll often be the fact I come back later like well let me just
like write up what I have so far and your understanding is like much much better right so there's
this this sense of maybe something's been processing I took that so seriously when I was a especially
a post-doc like when I was at the height of just all I do in my life is produce value with my brain
every day I would do what I call thorough walks because I discovered thorough well a grad student
I read it down by the Charles like the full sort of you know just minus the beret like pretentious
grad student thing but I was really in the the the Walden real influential book for me so every day
when I would walk back I was living on Beacon Hill walking from MIT so people who know Boston it's
going across the Longfellow Bridge I would say nothing but nature observation like that's what
I'm doing I'm just oh the ice is thinner on the Charles today like look at this tree or the leaves
coming back partially I think what was going on is like this was right after I'd been whiteboard
in it right I think it was letting stuff process right so I had this explicitly in my routine a lot
of time where I was okay I can't think about work at all I can't do anything else but you know I'm
thinking about the tree I'm thinking about the water like really sort of minimal cognitive lifts
and I wonder if that's what was going on there like to me that I mean that was a very productive
period of my life yeah I feel like in the in the last five ten years thanks largely in part to
Matt Walker's book why we sleep and the advocacy around sleep from others we've come to understand
that sleep is essential for mental health physical health and learning cognitive performance physical
performance so much so that now people devoted men's rounds of attention and resources to try
to get the best possible night sleep whereas it was the all sleep when I'm dead mentality prior to
that and I would love to see a world where people embrace not the notion of boredom per se but the
notion of gaps lack of external stimuli coming into our our eyes and our cognitive system as a
means to get smarter to get more creative to get better we just need a language for this yeah and
I think it's the you know so often it languages as a separator when it comes to health and
performance tools and something I really strive for is to try and create language that's not
linked to anyone person that it illustrates what something is for so maybe no small task
album maybe we'll just have you rename boredom as a neural rewiring box or something like that
I'll go with the term yeah my whole writing career by the way is based on taking things people
already intuitively know in their gut and giving it a two word name just having the language around
that really matters like it does deep work oh okay that's like this activity I kind of knew that
was important I didn't have a name or digital minimalism like oh yeah that I kind of know what
that means like it's a different different philosophy towards it but there's all so I do have a name
related to the gaps we're talking about but but for one of the other negative effects right so we
have the positive effects you talked about which is consolidation of learning and acceleration
of learning we had the one negative effect which was the Pavlovian connection to distraction the
other one I've written about before is solitude deprivation right so so I'm using a different
definition of solitude than the colloquial one most people think of it as a physical thing I'm
I'm just isolated but there's a there's a cognitive psychological definition of solitude which
means absence of stimuli created by other human minds right so I'm not taking in information that's
coming directly from another human mind having no period with this solitude so having no period in
your day where you're free from stimuli created from other minds is solitude deprivation and it's
a real issue and partially it's a real issue because when we're processing input from another human
brain it's all hands on deck right and we're very social beings a huge portion of our brain is
dedicated to this right so it's a very cognitively expensive activity when I'm trying to understand
another human's what they're saying I'm simulating their mental state I'm trying to understand like
where do they fall in this sort of social hierarchy and one of my arguments was when you spend your
entire day in that state it's exhausting and anxiety producing and like until we had smartphones and
ubiquitous wireless internet the idea that you could banish all solitude from your day is laughable
it's just impossible right so of course we had a lot of portions of our day where our brain was not
like ramped up in gear for the sort of social processing mode but smartphones makes it possible that
you can be in that mode all day long and so like one of the things I hypothesize is some of the
anxiety rises that goes with the age of smartphones is brain exhaustion right so that's another
negative effect of the constant we have two negative effects now for the constant stimuli and one
positive effect for the absence of the constant stimuli so I think we're making a case here for
not always being on your device yeah I agree what one of my favorite literature is from neurosciences
I think most people have heard of the so-called critical period stages of development when the
brain is essentially hyperplastic to any input for better or worse this is a stage of life
called childhood and then of course people throughout the number 25 after age 25 plasticity is
possible requires more effort tension etc and then sleep so forth but we know based on really
beautiful studies that if you deprive someone of sensory input for even a few hours and we're
not talking about sitting in a completely black and room with no input but you essentially limit
the amount of sensory input in the period that follows you get an opportunity for a hyperplastic
response to any stimuli and this just makes sense if you understand basics about signal the noise
in the visual system and the brain it just means when there's a lot of background chatter of
stuff it's harder to see the stuff that matters and the stuff that the brain's required to
very computer science-y neuroengineering type perspective but yes I would love for you to come
up with a two-word description of this it's not boredom induced plasticity it's this quiet
induced hyperplasticity or something I don't know maybe we can riff on this together sometimes
not trying to move into your space but I have a very practical question and I'd love to get a
little more insight into the structure of your days but are you a list maker? Do you wake up in
the morning and make lists and cross things off and then decide what are the key items on that list?
No I'm a time blocker. Time blocker. Yeah so I'm not a big believer in to-do list I like to grapple
with the actual available time like okay I have a meeting here I have to like pick my kids up from
school here here's the actual hours of the day that are free and where they fall all right what do I
want to do with that time? Well okay now that I see that there's a lot of gaps in the middle of the
day here they're short maybe there I'm gonna do a lot of small non-conjury demanding thing oh this
first 90 minutes in the morning it's like the main time I have uninterrupted okay so this I'm gonna
work on writing so I've been a big believer this since I was an undergrad like you give your time
a job as opposed to having a list which is somewhat orthogonal to what's actually happening your day
and then just as you go through your day seeing what do I want to try to do next which I think
is a lot less efficient I'm gonna try your method I try and structure my days as much as I can but
it just never quite works do you work late into the night or you know no I'm a 530 man okay yeah
so 530 PM that's it yeah more or less that's my cut off now the one exception is if I'm writing
on deadline I'll sometimes like if I need to get more writing done I can do an evening writing session
which which I got used to through long experience I've used to write my blog post at night after like
my kids went to bed now they're older and they don't go to bed as early so it's like the one thing
I have left that I'll do after 530 is like every once in a while I'll do like a 90 minute evening
writing block but I call this by the way this whole philosophy I call fixed schedule productivity
I've been doing it since I was a grad student fixed the work hour schedule that's my commitment I work
in these hours and then work downstream from that for everything else so like this controls like even
what you decide to bring into your life because you know I can't go past a schedule and it drives
you to be more innovative and how you deal with your time and schedule you have to be efficient
because you only have these these hours here that's been you know a signal for my my life since I
was in my early 20s fixed a schedule and don't work outside of that schedule now it's your move
to figure out anything you want to do you have to make that work when we come professor figure out
how to make that work you want to write books while you're being a professor figure out how to make
that work you don't have the option of just throwing hours at it and you innovate a lot I think when
you have the constraints where do sleep and exercise fit into your schedule what's your typical
to bed time wake up time what's your typical exercise routine and the reason I ask about this
is because I think nowadays we hopefully people understand that exercising cognitive function
are inextricably linked yeah and we're all going to live longer lives and be sharper mentally
by doing exercise yeah so I mean my main like actual working with weights I do this pre-dinner
right and this was the innovation in the last couple of years it's it's a fantastic
psychologically for me this is a transition from work to like family time after work is so
so I'll do like 45-50 minutes garage gym you know the way built during covid after I'm done working
before dinner and once you get used to that like it also forces you like I gotta finish work because I
got to get this in before dinner but then I'll do also quite a bit of walking if it's not a teaching
day so I'm not on campus I do a lot of thinking on foot you know walking my kids to the bus stop
which isn't particularly close and back so I'll do a lot of walking but that's when I by serious
exercise now is always always pre-dinner then I want to be up you know in our room by 10
and then at that point I don't track so I have insomnia issues which which actually has been like
key driver of a lot of the things I think about especially with slow productivity is I'm very wary
because I can without any control on my own just find myself unable to sleep sometimes fall asleep
or stay asleep fall asleep yeah I mean I used to get it really bad not so bad now but you know
it comes and goes that really affected the way I thought about productivity because it seemed
like to me the the definition of just I get after it with a bunch of stuff wasn't really on the table
because if my notion of productivity depended on me like every day being able to just like
hammer on a bunch of stuff I'm very busy I've lots of commitments what would happen if I couldn't
sleep I want to be able to do that so it I drifted naturally towards a definition of productivity
which was it doesn't really matter if you work tomorrow but it is important that like this month
you work like writing a book it doesn't matter if you work on your book chapter tomorrow in particular
but like this month you have to spend a lot of time working on it so it was like an insomnia
compatible definition of productivity was sort of morphed into this idea of slow productivity taking
your time with it so it's interesting so like sleep issues really shaped away I thought about work
and put me on these much longer time scales of productivity try not to be dependent on any particular
day being critical to what you do I don't want the high stress situation I don't want to like I'm
just going to ten hours a day for the next ten days we're going to make this deal happen like I
can't operate in that space because I worry about it anytime my brain could betray me and I
could like lose sleep for a couple days I think it's really important that you're sharing this because
while people's challenges differ I think oftentimes people hear the content of my podcast or
other podcasts and think oh gosh I have to have everything dialed in just right when in fact most
all of the tools and protocols that have been discussed on the Hubertman lab podcast are in response
to particular challenge that I've had or that others close to me have had and I love this
well I'm sorry that you suffer from insomnia we have a series on sleep with Matt Walker in which
he lays out some some great tools that we haven't yet discussed on the podcast I'll just send you
up text to you I'll call you with a short list of those and hopefully they'll help but
as we do cover insomnia and some depth but I think it's important that people realize that they
can be very productive with the hours that they have and the moments or hours of high focus clarity
that they have even if they're not sleeping great even if they're raising small children
because that's the real world and certainly that's the real world of deadlines and academia but
family and colds and flus and travel and jet lag and arguments and all the happy stuff too
vacations so sounds like you're very good at adapting your day to what's going on around it
but that you have certain sort of committed time in my correct in assuming that you have
at least one period of say 60 to 90 minutes of real what you would call deep work let's say at
least five days a week I know that might be an underestimate but it seems like that's what
that's what I'm extracting from this that's the goal right so so to me depending on the season
is how extreme that can get so the busiest season would be like a teaching semester right but even
then I'm going to make sure that five days a week I'm starting with deep work and the non-teaching
days a more than the teaching days compare that to the summer for example where like all I do for
the most part is deep work no meetings on Mondays and Fridays all admin stuff is
midday to early afternoon Tuesday Wednesday Thursday everything else is deep work you know just locked
in yeah hours at a time but I want if I'm not getting five days five days of starting the day with
deep work I'm I'm unhappy right because I mean I keep coming back to this is okay because I'm not
going to be able to I mean fortunately the insomnia does involve it has a bother me in years but the
threat of it like completely shaped away I think about things and because I know I'm never going to be
uh have a sort of like an Elon Musk style energy of like I can just take on seven companies and make
it happen right I just don't have that ability um I've always focused on the long game and to me the
long game plays out with get your deep work time in you know just keep working on the stuff you do
best and get better at it you know tomorrow doesn't matter but if you if you're doing this most days
for the next four months like that's going to matter you know and so I often think about productivity
my own life at the scale of decades like what do I want to do in my 20s you know okay what do I
want to do in my 30s you know what do I want to do in my 40s you know um and that helps like in my
30s I've a lot of young kids like it's yeah I mean the amount of time I could spend total working is
like much less right but I could still think about what do I want to do in my 30s how do I make that
happen let me make sure I'm pushing like on those things then everything else I can adapt to I can give
here and there you know it allows you to be very adaptable when you're thinking about what do I want
to do you know for the next 10 years it also means you're not on a random Tuesday
chiding yourself because like why didn't I get three more hours of work in that becomes sort of
a nonsensical question and what you care about is like what happens in the next decade which is
that's a long game it's not about you know hustling today it's about I came back to deep work
day after day after day when other people got distracted by TikTok you know like I got to yeah
whatever it's that coming back to what matters again and again years ago I was in a scientific
competition slash battle and one of my tools it wasn't really the kindest tool was I would just
suggest to the competitor um great television series so the wire yeah that's how it's great
and we want a few they want a few but um you know there's something very addictive about those
yeah Netflix shows I you know I mean they're unbelievably addictive just even seeing
that the the the slider next episode slider come up you can skip the intro it's just like they've
just dialed it in yeah so I suggest those to competitors all the time no longer but
then who knows what role they played but I just noticed in myself how distracting they could be
they could take me to when I start watching Ozark yeah I found myself waking up in the middle
of the night perhaps to use the restroom or something and then starting another episode of Ozark
is wild yeah and um I wonder whether or not a way to reverse engineer one's way to productivity
reverse hack our way to productivity would be to think about all the ways that you would
benevolently deploy distraction for a competitor and then ask yourself what which of those
you're still engaging in and think of yourself as sort of in a competition with the highly distracted
version of oneself yeah um because I think that one task um I think for us today is to try and
think about for the person listening to this who's non-academic um we're hearing about all this
distraction that enjoys some social media you know how how can they bring about the best version
of themselves in terms of productivity but also presence for family um presence with self um etc
and um and if one isn't in a competitive environment then maybe it's about setting up different
um mental maps of the self and then trying to pit them against one another and be the best version
yeah literally I think that's interesting right like think about what would be yeah what what I
like is idea of thinking about my competitor you know what what what would really give me a leg
off yeah am I doing this I mean but I would also add in here this is like a slower productivity type
idea um you figure out the thing you really care about you figure out what you would need to do to
really show up for that thing and then if you're doing that like give yourself a break on everything
else too you know what I mean it's like I'm this way with right if I'm getting in my writing time
I have to write I'm very uncomfortable and I'm not writing I just write all the time articles books
you know I'm always writing if I'm getting in my writing time then it's like okay the rest of the day
maybe like this week was a kind of a loss like the kids were homesick or there's a crisis at the
university or whatever and like I'm just trying to keep that under control and like have good
productivity habits and like don't context switch too much and don't be too distracted but still
have your fixed-hiddle productivity like in at 5.30 every day and time block and try to be reasonable
with that time limit the damage but if I'm doing the thing that ultimately really matters I'm
going to be pretty happy with it so it's like moving to the definition of am I happy with what I'm
producing away from a quantity metric and to this more am I aggregating the quality reps you know
and it like I think in weightlifting this would make a lot more sense right it's like yeah there's
a certain number of like a certain amount of time under load each muscle group needs to be on
and like if I'm doing that I'm happy if I'm you know weightlifting right there's no notion of like
why can't I why didn't I exercise five hours more this or that and so I sometimes try to think
about my core intellectual work that way like if I'm getting in the core deep reps and the thing
I care most about which for me is almost always writing then like the rest I just want to it's
like damage control like I want to like do the other stuff well and like not get too stressed out
about it and you know there's the productivity habits then that are about doing the stuff that
matters and protecting it and then there's the habits that are all just about let's not let the
other stuff get out of control you know I find it a little bit easier you go easier on myself when
I think about it that way do you listen to music while you work no well the data certainly
support not listening to music or if you do listen to music listening to music without lyrics yeah
you have to train even to get used to it right I mean even to get used to music without lyrics you
got to get used to it I guess your brain's building the filters some people I have met have trained
themselves to work with lyrical music which I think it took them a long time but I I met a self
published novelist who does like a million words a year which is crazy and he blast because he has
four kids he blasts Metallica in NASCAR earphones and I think how do you possibly write like this I think
you just trained his mind has just like a pure auditory filter that it's that it's he adapted I guess
or maybe his books are that good I don't know but I like silence or like background noise to
but even background noise is hard I have a hard time writing at cafes for example like I really do
like lack of stimuli do you use visual blinders you know like some people actually do this they'll
you know it's like a hoodie and they'll be like really trying to tunnel their vision which makes
perfect sense from the perspective of neuroscience I mean your visual world strongly constraints
to the the narrowness or the or the broadness of your cognitive maps yeah I mean I just have my
spaces engineered right so like where I write in my my library at home all the interesting windows
are like behind me and over here I'm staring across to windows it just looks right next to the
neighbors and like just typically blinds down but as you say this it just makes me want to you know
shout that you know so many people who think they have attention deficit issues have probably
just put themselves in compromised environments which include smartphone apps and things that so
I mean like like there's absolutely no way that they ought to be able to focus in fact perhaps the
fact that can focus at all is is miraculous given the constraints like trying to run with shackles on
yeah I mean look we're used to this with physical stuff right well if we if we analogize to
physical fitness we're so used to all these details right like it matters like what you're eating
like how you're sleeping the details of how you train and when you train and how much like we're
very used to this idea that that really matters we have no intuitions for cognitive development or
application we like treat our brain I guess because we associate it so much with a sense of self
it's just this sort of an effable connection to us as a person we don't think of it as much of an organ
as like a muscle or something like this but we don't have a sophisticated vocabulary at all for
thinking about how do you do stuff with your brain which is the if you're in knowledge work that's
the whole game like the whole game is this brain takes an information adds value to it it alchemizes
value out of out of mind stuff and people who who alchemize value out of you know muscles I'm a
relief pitcher in baseball that I know like my whole job is like to take a certain muscles on my
kinetic chain and use them to move a ball very fast if I if I really am very careful about this
I can have a multi-million dollar deal those of us who do this with our brain don't have any of
these intuitions it's just like you know you have to work hard you know and we're on our phone all day
I mean this has to be the physical equivalent if you had like an endurance athlete who's smoking
all the time like this is crazy like this is directly contra-intercating or indicating what you
need to do what matters like what what the actual activity is that matters for your value production
but with cognitive stuff we have no intuition like this yeah when I was a junior professor this was
down in San Diego not Stanford my girlfriend at the time she said to me she said you're like a
professional athlete that was before I got 10 year and she was like in you're trying to go from
like minor leagues to major to go from you know you're like second string to to starter yeah
so you have to treat what you're doing like a professional athlete with their their their game
like prioritize sleep prioritize food prioritize time prioritize you know it's and we as you
point out we don't do that with the mind we we tend for cognitive stuff we tend to assume that we
just flip a switch and like focus time and I think that's in part because there are certain things
such as social media such as a great movie such as certain social interactions that can
immediately and completely harness our attention yeah unlike a marathon or where sure I could
probably finish the 26 miles or wherever it is 26.23 I forget what is if I had to do it right now
to save my life but it's not like I can just hit a switch and and and I think that's the that's the
kind of um caveat here is that the kid that loves video games can definitely focus yeah give him
her a video game they love and boom they're focused so it seems as if there's a problem when they can't
but they know they can right is it's stuff obvious when one states it but I think um
it's worth pointing out that this stuff needs attention it needs it needs work yeah which means
and it starts with vocabulary it starts with intentions starts with examples you know I mean
there should be a book like how to think that we just give to everyone get learned and learn
yeah like how to use your brain like the user manual you know like that would be a very useful
user manual and I think in like elite cognitive professions this gets handed down as lore and people
figure it out right I mean like this was like my experience trained at MIT in the theory group is
that you know everything was focused on getting the most out of your mind and so it's being passed
down from you know person to person it was also in the culture it was in the way that people
acted but most places that do cognitive work don't have these don't have these cultures yeah but
here's the advantage though here like here's the silver lining right if you're one of the few
cares about it's a huge advantage right now like it's a it's a big part of like my success I don't
think I have the highest horsepower brain but like it I care a lot about trying to you know
get the most out of it like to push it to like the edges of like the reps like and I can actually
RPMs like can actually get out of it you know so it's an advantage as you know someone is listening
to this you start caring about your brain how it works how you want to take care of it what you
want to get out of it you start caring about this you're going to get advantage as compared to the
person right next to you like suddenly in your office or you know in your grad program it's going
to be like well it's going on here yeah super power and sometimes there's a bit of a social
cost upfront yeah when I made the shift from being a let's just call it a not serious student to
a serious student in college and I was coming from behind I had to put so many more hours in and so
partying was this something happened fairly seldom I still did it but and it was isolating yeah
I actually lived alone in a studio apartment I mean as it's isolating there you're you're going
to miss out on certain things there's there's some deprivation there but you eventually end up
in a position to do far more with your life yeah of course what you said a moment ago also reminds
me David Goggins the David Goggins no no introduction needed has been quoted as saying you know it's
easy nowadays to be exceptional because so many people are just distracted and wasting their time
so that you put in 20% more effort to being more focused or toward toward your fitness program and
you're gonna you're gonna surpass many many people yeah so it's not that hard to accelerate is just
it it takes some practices that are socially challenging to implement it's it's funny I had that
same experience as an undergrad that you had yeah because I cared I was impatient to be done
with college and like to do things with my brain I want to be a writer I want to be an academic but
you know that takes a lot of work and I really cared a lot about it so I was I was a fraternity brother
for one day and I went to the first meeting they're doing you know he just held a pledging or
whatever and I remember I just not for me and I walk away it's like I'm not going because this
is going to be distracting like the the hangovers and this and that and and you know I want to focus
on writing I want to learn how do this it is pretty isolating yeah I um and I know some people that
were in the Greek system that also benefited tremendously from that I wasn't one of them um but
I definitely resonate with it yeah yeah so not everyone yeah I mean they don't all have to be
as it's not all I were right um but but caring about your brain it gives you a lot of options
and if you're playing catch up it there's almost always a social cost associated with it but
you eventually are joined by many other people you find the other nerds it's a lot of
nerds the other nerds misfits and people who um who are you know seeking something they come around
you fight you you find them uh I'm interested in this concept of burnout um we hear about burnout
um we associate with it too much adrenaline lack of sleep tired and wired um feeling disengage
the the poet David white has a beautiful poem I forget the title about burnout where he says that
that I think the cure to burnout is wholeheartedness um and I I always like that's a bit more abstract
than the kinds of things we're talking about today um but I like that because there's something
about wholeheartedness um really leaning into something with with the true desire to be there
and to explore it no matter how hard that is um the opposite extreme of burnout yeah well I
mean I think burnout in if we're thinking knowledge work like people with office jobs my diagnosis
there it's not exactly quantity of work that that does play a role it's the kind of work because I
think what's happening what what's been deranging actually for people in these jobs is uh workloads
are getting larger right in part because communication is low friction and we always want to be
demonstrating activity because of pseudo productivity and people are always asking to do things we say yes
everything we say yes to brings with it administrative overhead right which is talking about the
thing but not actually doing it so it's like emails about the commitment it's a meetings about the
commitment um because our workloads are larger what happens then is more and more of our time has
to service this administrative overhead because everything we say yes to brings with it its own overhead
it adds up and aggregates right so now more and more of our day is spent talking about work
and not actually doing the work and then make it even worse it's not like this overhead is all
batch together it's sort of spread out throughout your day so it's also putting you in that state of
constant distraction which makes it hard to do work what I think is burning people out is they're
now in this state where they're saying I'm spending most of my day talking about work sending emails
attending meetings very little time is left to actually make progress on the work and then the
the workload gets larger and larger this by itself is deranging right this it feels like you're in
some sort of um nihilistic experiment like what what is this why why I have six hours and meetings
I'm not actually just can't be the right way to work um and then what happens of course is you
have to recover time in the morning in the afternoon maybe after your kids go to bed they try to
actually make progress so now you also have just a straight work quantity issue so you're working
more hours there's an energy drain but I think that psychological piece of this can't possibly make
sense that like I'm checking email once every two minutes and spend six hours in zoom like doing
very little actual high value work like this can't be the right way to work that's what I think
the burnout epidemic right now is coming from is is that psychological component of we all know this
is stupid but no one is saying the emperor has no clothes on we all know that the amount of email
and meetings I'm doing is such a waste of my salary like this is a highly trained brain like I could be
writing these reports or this code or creating these business strategies um but we're all just
accepting this I think the absurdity of the current situation is creating as much of the burnout as
it is just we also have to add these extra hours just like a straight aggregation of work quantity
it's almost analogous to taking professional athletes or would be professional athletes and
having them do a bunch of other physical labor so that they're showing up not fresh for the game
and little micro injuries and distracted and um and no one's admitting that this doesn't make
sense and everyone's just getting injured and no one's talking about it so it's the absurdity of
it would drive people crazy and it is driving people crazy it's so difficult though because
certain things like smartphones are very useful on the hospital ward I mean doctors can communicate
nurses communicate so much faster now um parents and kids can communicate who's gonna pick up the kids
and nope got stuck in traffic you go this way alternate route on google maps and on and on so
it's all woven in with stuff that's that's also highly adaptive it makes it tough yeah you know
it's almost like the work of being a selective filter yeah is half the work of trying to
deload the cognitive systems that would allow you to do deep work yeah well in the workplaces
even harder than that right because because part of the issue is email and slack let's just say
digital communication um I spent a lot of time studying that closely right from like a technocratic
standpoint the introduction of digital communication to the workplace and the problem there is the
reason why we're checking this all the time it's not some like individual habit de-optimization
it's not oh I should just check this less often what happened is when we introduced low friction
digital communication to the office this it emerging consensus came about that said great let's
just use ad hoc messaging as our major way of collaborating like we can just figure things out on
the fly I can just be like and you what's going on with the whatever and you can answer me and I can
send it back um this was very convenient the activation cost was low and so this is how we began
actually collaborating on work now what happens is as workloads get higher we now have many things at
the same time they're all generating these asynchronous back and forth conversations most of these
have some sort of time sensitivity right so if I email you and say like what's going on with like the
guest coming later today we have to kind of resolve this before later today um so now it's not just
that these messages are going back and forth with all these different threads but I have to keep
checking my inbox to make sure the gap's not too big this is not a failure of habits it's not a
moral failure it's uh necessitated by the fact that all these back and forth conversations have to
keep moving forward so it is difficult then if you're in this system to step out by yourself
because this is the way we're collaborating is these asynchronous back and forth messages and I
can't disengage myself from that without slowing things down like a from a like a mathematical
game theory point of view it's a suboptible Nash equilibrium it's not the right place not the
right way to to run this to the utility value this configuration is low but no one individual can
deploy a different strategy that's going to be higher value we're stuck in it right and so now it
becomes really hard for an individual just to say I want to check my email less often it's built in
systemically into this hyperactive hive mind workflow and the only way to break free from the
suboptimal configuration is to basically have the organization itself do like a really high cost
change to the rules of the game these are how we're collaborating now we're not using email freely
anymore we're going to use this system instead here you it's a very expensive top down procedure
to free ourselves from the suboptimality it's like in the world of work that's partially why this is
such an intractable problem and I tried to write a book about this recently and it was really hard
to gain traction because it's not easy to solve this like no individual can move out of this and
you have to put in a lot of energy as an organization to try to change this so it's in some sense
email is a more insidious problem than social media on the phone because at least over here
this is my engagement with this and I might have these moderate behavioral addictions but I could
make differences here in my company oh this is much worse this is like a systemic problem it's an
emergent deterministic work impact on an economic social cultural system that was completely
dynamical and went in a way we didn't really expect so it's a it's a really tough situation
sometimes especially in the world of work how do we get out of this constant distraction it's why
you know I wrote deep work and I was like well why don't people just do this that's why they don't
just do this because it's not so easy to reclaim this time well it's like when I was a graduate
student in postdoc I was focused on eating pretty well meaning just clean-ish food and
people talked less about that at that time yeah I was also really committed to exercise and
so 16 people were less committed to that in the academic sector at that time now I think it's
commonplace for people like I'm going to my yoga class I'm doing my zone two cardio I go to the
gym you know men and women do this yeah I remember I'm like this like sneak off to the gym like oh yeah
yeah and you know you felt like a bit of an oddball if you were the one bringing your lunch to the
the you know the pizza luncheon not there's any wrong pizza love pizza but I was trying to eat
well I have for a long time I feel better when I do and I'm grateful that I did but you get some
weird looks like out you have a eating disorder or something like that that's what people would say
then yep now people will probably look you know that looks better than the pizza people start
to understand so I think there needs to be a cultural shift yep and I think there has been a
cultural shift around food and exercise certainly food meditation sleep yep I think people are far
more accepting and actually encouraging of their workers and co-workers I'm taking really good
care in order to function better for longer yeah I think this is going to be the next revolution
and it's going to be a revolution it's going to unlock we're talking on the scale of like a
trillion dollar GVP when we go through knowledge work and have this revolution I call it like the
cognitive revolution let's take really seriously how the brains of our workers work like these are
our number one assets like not to be too mechanistic about it but what is our main capital asset if
we're a knowledge work organization we have some buildings but really these brains that we have
like employment contracts with these brains create value let's take seriously how the brains
actually operate and as soon as we do we'll say oh my god these brains are checking email once every
two minutes what a disaster it's like if we had a car factory and we spent 20 million dollars on
one of these German robots that can you know put cars on the doors or whatever and we just weren't
taking care of it and it was like rusty and it was dropping the doors and the production pipeline
was going down we said this is crazy we got to take care of this equipment right when we have the
cognitive revolution the sort of cognitive capital revolution and knowledge work I think it's
going to unlock a trillion dollar GVP I think that's how unproductive we've been if we just think in
the pure raw terms of brains producing stuff that's worth money like if we're just like super
deterministic and kind of inhumane about it so much is being lost because we're in the suboptimal
Nash equilibrium everyone just email everyone all the time everyone's just on slack all the time
that when we finally have the revolution to get over that it's going to be a massive economic
kit and you know AI might play a role in this right because maybe AI wants to get planning
capabilities is going to be able to take the burden of some of this back and forth planning
I think it's easier to get there with cultural shifts I don't think we have to wait to build
an email capable chat GPT to do this like you could solve this tomorrow this is cultural as
much as this tool based but I think it's going to be a huge revolution when we get there a
akin to like the assembly line in manufacturing which was like a 10X improvement in productivity
metrics when we figured out the continuous motion assembly line with interchangeable parts
was a massive it created this productivity engine I'm using the economics and so productivity
now you know dollars per worker the economic miracle that came from this process-based industrial
innovations in the late 19th early 20th century the money generated by that the wealth generated
by that was the foundation of the modern west like the whole world as we know it was built there's
these huge latent potentials and right now I don't think we're there with the brain and I think
it's going to be a huge revolution it's just it's just difficult right it's not an easy revolution
to start but I think it's going to change whole industries in ways that we're not it's going to
be hard to even imagine yeah and I think as long as there are individuals who either by virtue of
lack of family or other constraints or by virtue of just having more energy and requiring less
sleep because these individuals do exist out there yeah there will always be these individuals
that can kind of apply themselves more than others in the sense that they can get in earlier and
stay in later yeah and and that trying to be them is not a good idea that we all need to optimize
for our you know best balance of productivity deep work and work life balance for lack of a
better term when I was a graduate student I was really committed to my my craft and I remember
that hearing about a student he's now a professor a very accomplished and a chronologist I'll just
give him a name because he did this that he doesn't know me but I heard about this guy that had been
in the department Randy Nelson and everyone's like he used to work a hundred hours a week yeah so
I was like all right great I'm going to start logging my work hours silently I'm going to do 102
hours and I ended up with a flu and autoimmune condition yeah I literally had an autoimmune condition
you've never had one since then I stopped working that much yeah started working quote unquote
smarter in the lines of many of the things you're saying here although I didn't implement or
know about all these tools that time and of course the autoimmune thing went away it was a fairly
minor thing yeah never had it again but you can destroy yourself simply by working more yeah
um even if it's deep work so that the solution is not necessarily more it's um just like with
exercise I guess that stand is obvious but I thought I'd share that anecdote because uh
Randy Nelson taught me what I'm capable of and what I'm not capable of yeah well the other
thing that happens by the way too it's not just who's capable of working more get these advantages
there's these other unpredictable inequities um I talked at a law firm once years ago about deep work
and I was invited by a group was actually a group of women lawyers who had a reading group
and they said part of what was happening at this law firm is that people who were uh disagreeable
like just sort of gruff and jerks would get asked to do less of what they would call non-promotable
activities or can you organize this or whatever which meant they had more time to do deep work uh
which meant they would do better and they would rise faster and then what was happening then was
you had accidentally built a system that said let's make sure we have a fast track for like our
most disagreeable employees to the partnership level where actually you need to be pretty
agreeable because your client acquisition is really on the partners and so they accidentally had
you know pushed towards this uh this inequity and these type inequities happen all the time when
we leave it like haphazard and okay so who's doing less work like like well I just sort of like
I'm gruff and people don't like me or I have something going on at my house it means I don't have
the same time to do this um and you end up pushing people up these paths that might not be who you
really want to select because you're selecting for uh things that are sort of unrelated to their
actual underlying talent or like how much they can actually produce and so I'm with you on that
yeah it's a complex problem but attractable one nonetheless I'm interested in your thoughts on
remote work versus in-person work and the hybrid model yeah um I've heard about a hybrid model
recently if anyone's a big um record company uh here in Los Angeles so that um they require one
in-person day per week unless on sick leave um they require one at home day per week and then the other
days it's at your discretion yeah it's kind of an interesting model for you in a five day week model
yeah I mean I my my proposals have thought about this a lot is okay if you're gonna do hybrid work
and I proposed this in a lantic art of cruelty recently which created some positives some negative
waves as like here's the way you should do it uh synchronize the schedule here's at home days here's
an office days but for everybody for everybody okay or have a few of these schedules but like
groups of people who work together have the same schedule but then make the rule at home days no
meetings no email like that's the way to really get the full benefit out of hybrid work when we're
in the office we have meetings and we can talk about work and we're at home we're just doing work
and we can do it without distraction and we can just stay deep and really turn through things I
think it would really make a big difference on the overload issue I think would be much more
sustainable remote work so I did a lot of coverage or remote work as this was first emerging the
early pandemic there I became convinced I was doing this twice a month column for the New Yorker
back then that was just looking at the pandemic transforming work and I came away with the idea that
remote work can be fantastic but it's difficult and it can't just be do the job you were doing in
person but just do it at home and we have zoom and we'll figure it out like if you're going to be
fully remote we have to rethink what work means for that and there's a lot of differences it needs
to have it needs to be way more structured it probably needs to be you're working on less things
it's very clear what you're working on the collaboration is much more defined and much less frequent
you probably need to be freed from the sort of hyperactive hive my dance of we're just emailing
each other all day and in zoom meetings all day you have to sort of reconstitute what a remote
work job is I think before it works and we know this in part because software developers pre-pandemic
were one of the only knowledge sectors to have a really successful track record with remote work
that is the only sector within knowledge work where we had large companies fully remote they did
that because their jobs they they had really structured them around these these agile workload
management systems where okay here's when we talk about work here's how long it takes here's
how we assign you new work you work on one thing at a time you sprint till it's done they had all
this structure around work which didn't really matter if you're in the office or not so the less
structured work is the more free for all the more you need we have to be in the office so like I'm a
huge fan of full-time remote work but I think those jobs have to look very different than like a
standard 2019 job yeah I've always done a hybrid of remote work I stick Wednesday mornings at
home from the lab yeah but nowadays it's wild because it's especially during the pandemic but
still now I mean you can do the whole day in pajamas and get it worked on and I love this idea of no
no email and limiting text and social media while at home doing work to really extract the
most out of it yeah are there any data maybe from the pandemic era or prior or beyond about zoom and
things like it in terms of how they enhance or diminish or perhaps have no effect on productivity
like zoom specifically and yeah meetings we haven't we just found ourselves in zoom all the time
for a while that was the bigger problem I mean so there is data that says for example a hybrid meeting
some people are online some people aren't these are less effective meetings they don't they don't
work as well but the bigger problem is zoom I think was the quantity and part of it was just the
the technology involved right so if we're in the office together and I have a relatively quick
thing to talk to you about I can just grab you and we can talk about this and then the footprint is
going to be five minutes but it's not just that it's five minutes it's five well allocated minutes
because I'm probably going to use the social cues of your doors open or you're going to get coffee
anyways right and the zoom error instead we would say what we should set up a meeting right because
as you know we have to talk about this but if you think about a standard online calendar it's
difficult to have a meeting this less than 30 minutes long I mean you just you have to drag it you
know I mean 30 minutes is like the default smallest length meeting so we're taking a lot of informal
back and forth and inflating the time I think that was part of it so we just had too much zoom going
on right if it was just I do one meeting a week now it's on zoom it used to be in person we're all
on zoom we saw being person it's that's not that big of a deal it's maybe like a slightly less
effective meeting but it's fine it's good enough but if it's I have four x more meetings than I used
to because of the the inherent inefficiencies of having to go to prescheduled virtual for basically
all collaboration that could be a huge problem the data I saw from Microsoft the last data I saw
was a 252 percent increase in these meetings from 2020 to now and it's not a number it's not like
it peaked and then it started coming back down again once we went to hybrid we just it's just high
and it's still creeping up right that's a lot of time that just vanished and we sort of pretend like
it didn't but that's a lot of time that is not actively working on things and just talking
about work or talking about other stuff while we get around to talking about work I think it's a real
issue is there a top three list of things that if you had a magic wand you would see everyone do
each day you know if you yeah if you had three he wishes um yes you mean what they be if the
knowledge worker if he's of the enhancing work creativity focused work I mean I think you and I both
um clearly agree that there's not just great value in terms of productivity yeah but a great
degree of life enrichment yeah like a deep level of enrichment in terms of happiness feelings
of well-being kind of time for connectivity with others yeah lessons about deep work that can be
exported to time with others where we we are really present etc just so much to be gained from
these from engaging in deep work yeah and things like it that you've written about in your various
books um and talk about on your podcast are you know if is there a top three yeah yeah yeah so if I
do three I would say okay um first of all with your workload simulate something like a pull system
instead of a push system and what I mean by that is when you keep track of what you're working on
have a the top part of that list which is um actively working on these things and keep that top
part of your list like two or three things everything else is in the bottom part of the list it's
to work on next and it's in an ordered queue and so when you finish something that you're working on
you pull something new to take it slot from the list below right so what I'm trying to do with that
advice is reduce all this administrative overhead because now even if like you can't get away you
have to say yes to these things because it's the way like your your organization works the stuff
that's in the waiting to work on queue you say I don't have meetings about that I don't do emails
about that I wait till I'm actively working on it and I only actively work on three things at a time
now I'm going to finish those things really quickly because I don't have 15 items worth the
meetings I'm going to every day so things are going to pull up there pretty quickly and so the rate
at which I'm accomplishing things will probably be higher than it was before but I only work on three
things actively you could even make this visible it's in a shared document if you want to when
someone asked you to do something new tell them to put it on the end of your queue you're like oh okay
so like Andrew is not working on this right now he's working on these three things and there's
seven things here and I'm adding something number eight so I know not to expect something for a while
in fact I can keep checking this list until I see Andrew's working on it so I can see it's making
progress and then once I know he's working on it I can start email him about it we can do just a
normal type of overhead you would have with with projects right that alone is going to have a huge
difference like now the amount of distraction your day is going to plummet because that's generated
from overhead of things you've agreed to do and that's going to that's going to plummet that out
all right so that'd be number one could I just thank you could I just ask a few questions about that
just to clarify so for I use myself as an example selfishly but then of course I don't know
what everyone else out there is pursuing but so substitute the specifics I'm about to insert here
for whatever it is that you care about in your life so researching podcasts yeah solo podcasts
in particular for me is my major task in life these days yeah with respect to work so that would
be top of the list yeah and then there could be two other items on this you know top of Q would
daily activities like like exercise social time with loved ones etc would that be included there
or we're talking specifically about work yeah let's just keep just work okay so it'll be you know
podcast prep but you might have the podcast prep right you might have the particular topic though
right right yeah so part right I'm working on an episode right now about about skin health yeah
um so you could you could have two different episodes topics your copying does could both be up
there yep so skin health allergies episode these are two that I'm spending a lot of time on
um months yeah in fact yeah right and then you heard might be something that it involves the
uh the media company something on the business side but like okay we're trying to figure out um
a plan for whatever right content for for a new context brand association yeah exactly okay got it
great so that those three would be top of the list and every day until those are done
they could sit top of the list and then there are a number of items underneath those that fall under
whatever yeah and critically when these other items come up right like oh this is like a topic
for example I want to do a show on you have a place to put it um it's not being forgotten or here's
a there's a business idea really we need to figure out like whatever we want to add do something
with our camera configure okay put on the list it's not being forgotten like it's on there and you
can see where it is not only is it on there but like this could be shared among your team so as
people had extra information or things to add to one of these projects they can add it to it on
the list right so the information is aggregating so if you use a tool like Trello for this Trello
spelled T-R-E-L-L-O okay is an app it's a web-based service that the metaphor is just index cards in
piles right but they're virtual okay but you can flip over the index card digitally attach files
right notes and so I use Trello for my own organization what I'm working on so now you have a place
where you can gather like oh we just I just heard about something that's relevant to this thing I
need to work on you have a place to put it like it goes on to the Trello card or you could do this
with shared documents doesn't matter you're just like literally typing things into a Google Doc you
or a whiteboard or a whiteboard yeah yeah you could be we're keeping track of these things right
I'm gonna do this by the way yeah well I mean I'm a big believer in this and then everyone can
see what you're working on and then the key thing is if it's not in your active list you don't have
meetings about it and you don't have emails about it right like if people have ideas or things they
just add it to the card so when that gets up to the active list we can work on all the information
there we haven't forgotten anything and what two word language you used to describe this first
point this method I love this I called it a pull-based pull-based right what gets me pulled up you
pull in to the so you're fixing it in advance here's how much concentration I have to give on work
and you pull stuff into that the alternative is push-based which is how most organizations run which
is when I want you to do something I just push it on to you and now you have to deal with it got it
once her email described as a public post to do list yeah that made me scared of email in a way
that nothing else had yeah it's new ports pull-based system I called it that by the way
this is what in a lot of the advice in the first one of the chapters of the new book is basically
how do you get away with implementing this and when you have a boss and there's like all sorts
of different so you're your own boss you can just say this is what we're doing here's the board
but there's a lot of like subtle ways you can do this yeah right so that's number one that's
number one the um cal new quarts pull-based system I'm gonna do this and I'm actually gonna report
back on this at some point you won't see the post on social media because you're not there but
others well all right so that's one all right number two would be multi-scale planning okay so now
this is planning uh you're planning on three different scales daily weekly I think seasonally or
quarterly however you want to think about it right so you have a a plan for like the semester the
season or the quarter like this is what I'm working on these are the big objectives I want to hit
here's to remind us to myself about like what matters like remember like I'm overhauling my
my workout routine we're trying to like do this with the podcast you look at that scale planning
every week when you build your weekly plan and the weekly plan it gets freeform text you don't
need anything you know any special tools your weekly plan you're looking at the actual calendar
all right uh what from my bigger scale plan my seasonal quarterly plan what am I trying to make
sure I can make progress on this week and you confront the reality of your week you see where
it's the empty space where there's the busy space you also change what's on your plate right here
you know if I cancel this thing that frees up that whole morning which means like I could really
make progress on this which I really want to make progress on so great I'm going to cancel that
thing on Friday so you're looking at the whole week is one unit then every day you look at your
weekly plan like okay so so I'm going to use this when I make my plan for the day and when you do
your daily plan you do time blocking now I'm every I'm giving a job every minute on my workday
not my day after work but every minute my workday I'm time blocking so I call it time blocking is
you're literally drawing blocks around the free time okay this I'm working on this this I'm working
on this so you're making a plan for your day that is informed by the weekly plan so in multi-scale
planning you have like the the big picture things you care about trickle their way all the way down
to okay I'm what am I going to do during this hour during the day but you don't have to grapple
every this what most people do every time I'm figuring out what to do next I'm not grappling with
all these scales at the same time what are my objectives what's my big plan what's going on this
week you're you're dealing with each of these scales when the time is right and so when it finally
gets down to it's now three o'clock you're just doing what that block is and you figured out that
block earlier today when you looked at your weekly plan that weekly plan reflected what was in your
semester plan which you figured out you spent a whole afternoon working on at the beginning of
the semester so multi-scale planning it keeps you focused on what matters it prevents you from
wandering through your day and how you disperse your energy and it gives you control over your time
on different scales from like canceling major ongoing obligations that just being more efficient
about what you do during a given day so I swear by multi-scale planning to try to keep this whole
lumbering ship that is sort of like Kell Newport aiming in the towards the right shores you know
like keep correcting and keeping it aimed back I love this this is more or less what I do with my
physical workouts every week I know I mean to get three resistance training sessions two or three
cardiovascular training sessions I know I'm gonna train my legs once it's either gonna be on
depending on travel Sunday money or Tuesday I'll train torso muscles in the middle of the week I'll
train sort of limb accessory muscles on a Saturday yeah long run on Sunday or hike on Sunday or
some other day there'll be some sort of hit workout in the middle of the week and ideally there's
a jog in there too and you can adjust it a little bit based on the reality of the week yeah I might
double up yeah for two days then take a day off I have my ideal schedule but sometimes it gets
compromised and and then I do that for 16 week cycles where I vary the kind of intensity load etc
and I've done this for years and it's just kind of works for me yeah now with cognitive work I don't
tend to do this it tends to be more deadline based yeah but I think that the the pull-based system
is really gonna help yeah if I dovetail it with this multi-scale planning I love this and you can
see the deadlines now you see him coming right so that's part of what's nice about multi-scale planning
is you know the deadlines coming up and so when you're doing your semester planning you start
thinking like okay for the big deadlines like when I get the December I need to be really starting
getting after this thing is going to be due yeah I've got a book to yeah so then you know and so
this really helps in book writing because now when I'm planning it's like you know a year in advance
I know this month I need to get like roughly the rough draft of chapter two done you know and then
that trickles down to my week where I'm gonna make sure I have enough time cleared to like be on
track for finishing it and then that trickles into my day now I know to like block those mornings
to work on it so it all it all works together an added bonus of the daily scale is I would say
communications should get its own block email social media whatever that's like you communicating
with the outside world goes into your time block plan so if your block doesn't include that you
don't do it so it's like this block is writing it's not email it's not social media so the rule
is really simple I'm not gonna use email or social media but I still need to do email at some point
so I have to put a block in for it and when I'm in my email blocks I'm doing the email if I need to go
on social media to see what's going on with like the latest episode or something I got to give that
time and then you can monofocus because then it's a psychological hack but basically when you
particularly when you schedule communication and distraction now the only thing you have to
muster willpower to do is obey the single rule of I'm following my blocks if you don't do that
if you're like I just sometimes do email and social media sometimes I don't now what you have to do
is just constantly be having this debate is now the right time to do this and I'm gonna do it at
some point today why not now well what about now what about now like you're just constantly asking
yourself right that's impossible right that's gonna drain you but if all you have to do instead
is say my commitment today is to follow my blocks and I get I really feel good when I do it and like
I check off a box if I do give yourself some feedback here it's a much easier cognitive battle
the win then just trying to be reasonable about well let me wait a little longer to check my email
like you're gonna lose that battle you know eight times out of 10 which is like enough to really
overcome it so that's like a hidden bonus of time blocking is now you can really get your arms
around separating different cognitively distinct activities this is where the analogy of time
restricted eating comes to mind yeah again not that that's the best way to lose weight or maintain
weight or it's it's rolling longevity is still debated etc but I think for many people not all but
for many people the decision that they do not eat during certain time blocks and they do eat
another time blocks it's just far more tractable in the real world for them then trying to limit
portion size decide whether or not they're gonna eat or they're gonna pass the cookie and have a
little bit nope they're they're interfesting window it's just it simplifies the issue yep
and as a consequence I think it improves behavior overall although the clinical trials point to
some mixed results with that last statement again I don't want the nutrition east does after me
though the point is the time blocking and the the thick black line didness of the yes no the binary
yes no as um eat don't eat or a single commissary email communicate don't communicate in a given
a time block I think that's that really um is what it's about it it honors the the power of those
sorts of neural computations and there's another hidden bonus of time blocking too is visually
distinct blocks so what I do for example is I put a double thick line around deep work blocks
focusing on some not just deep work but deep work on things I really care about
just this gives you a visual record how much deep work am I doing right like it's this diagnosis
I use a paper based time block planner so you flip through those pages and you're just looking for
dark blocks right so you see if I see I don't have a lot of dark blocks I see this is my whole job
like my whole life I've been trained in a lab to think really hard about things and write things
why do I not have very many dark blocks you get this feedback mechanism so there's all these
bonuses when you start doing this type of doing this type of planning before you tell us about
number three I often have fantasized about a web based program that seems to run countercurrent
of much of what you're talking about but goes back to this the whiteboard MIT observer stuff that
you talked about the beginning which is often long for okay I need to write today I need to write a
book or I'm going to do some podcast prep I'm going to pop up a few windows of other people that
are also doing deep work and we're not going to communicate in fact if we do or if music comes
through on the microphone or somebody coughs that's going to be considered a distraction but it does
anyone want to join me for some deep work yes where we don't communicate and I often thought I
would just pay someone to be there yeah to just sit there and but I haven't done that there are
multiple companies to do this okay yeah it's interesting you're you're you're online with
or in person was just other people doing deep work so a deep work club basically the
challenge is synchronizing schedules because I might want to do this with somebody on the East Coast
and they might not be doing deep work at the same time and a recording isn't the same because then
you know they're not really watching yeah but but there's something really to this right yeah
especially for at home workers or people like me that work often in isolation
do this right dissertation boot camps I don't know if if you had this experience but Georgetown
does a lot of colleges do this okay everyone work on their dissertation we're all going to get
together and we're going to work on it together because they would often have me come speak at these
things earlier in my career it would just be a bunch of grad students they were just coming to the
same space and they would work for like okay 90 minutes and then they would have like a speaker
come in or launch and nine so the the group cohesion of everyone working deeply at the same time
writers retreats are the same way we all go to this same house in the middle of nowhere
so that we're all just going to encourage each other the right because that's all what anyone's
doing here yeah so social pressure I'm with you I was thinking if I ever needed to you know
put a big extension on my house that's that's what I should do just like okay pay me money
then I will sit there on zoom and do deep work with you this is my secret plan I pay money I'd pay
money to do deep work in parallel with you by with a virtual window there there's Kalan
his office doing that I think there's something nice about having some knowledge of who people are
yeah you know like hey login in today yeah yeah all right let's get down to it set the timer and go
and then you know osta I'm out you know working at the library academic libraries why did people do that
right this everyone there is working right yeah no I'm big believer in that there's really
something sticky to that okay number three all right have a shutdown ritual which clearly
demarcates the end of work in the start of the night after work and the shutdown ritual so it has to
you have to close open loops right so you got to make sure this is like a review type period let
me look back at my inbox and look at my plan let me look at my you know my time block and my calendar
um really make sure I there's nothing urgent that needs to be dealt with that I did it and there's
nothing that's just in my head that I don't want to forget it's not written down somewhere like
take care of all of that right so you review all these things you get what am I gonna do tomorrow
you don't have to build your whole plan for tomorrow you have a sense for it um and then you need some
sort of demonstrative thing you do to indicate that you finished a routine right so my my long time
newsletter readers know I used to actually have a phrase I would say schedule shutdown complete
like a crazy phrase right it's not how normal people talk right um now I have a planner that has
like a check box that says shutdown complete next to it the reason why that it's a demonstrative anchor
is that you use this then for cognitive behavioral therapy because at first people have a hard time
shutting down work I mean I invented this because I had a very hard time shutting down working on
my dissertation I just what this proof doesn't work and blah blah so what you do is when you're
you get a rumination post shutdown hey what about what's going on with our work we doing the right
thing do we forget this or that instead of engaging in the rumination well let's like no I think we're
okay let me think about my schedule tomorrow what's my plan you instead can just say um I said that
crazy phrase right check that box I wouldn't have said that phrase unless I had gone through everything
and made sure that I had a good plan and nothing's been missed and it was okay to shut down work
because of that I'm not going to engage with you rumination I said the weird thing let's get back
to what we're doing this is like cognitive behavioral therapy that after a month or so you were really
able to actually effortlessly disengage from work and do everything you know all the other stuff that
matters right without having the constant rumination about work which gives your mind an actual
break to you know do other things so I mean this is more mental health and productivity but for me
it was critical I mean I can really remember when I came up with this you know exactly where I was
in my graduate career and there's just too much too many ideas and concerns that were just
roiling and like once I did this you know it took a few weeks and then I could actually like shut down
and go on and do other things yeah the paired associative nature of the brain can make it really
problematic if you're thinking about work at the dinner table you start to associate the dinner
table with work I mean it when a mat walker came here to do this six part series that's soon to be
released and we were discussing insomnia he said you know one of the major issues with insomnia
is people who have trouble falling asleep or staying asleep will often stay in bed when they can't
sleep and then the bed becomes associated with challenges with sleep yeah that you know hence the
recommendation that virtually every sleep coach and sleep scientist recommends that people actually
if they can't sleep for 20 minutes or so of effort then you get up and leave the bed and go someplace
else until until you feel sleepy enough to go back and try or fall asleep on the couch elsewhere yeah
I put that in as a as a note to you but this seems incredibly important also for enrichment of
relationships with spouses and children and people in your life I mean the problem is the first
thing that we ask people when they walk in the door typically it was how does work today yeah
how does work what do you do today yeah tell me about your school day tell me about your work maybe
we need to come up with better questions yeah like here's something interesting we could do or
here's like something I read about unrelated to work yeah no I think I think it makes a huge
difference and again there's all these meta benefits for these things so so one of the meta
benefits for all of these is also these are all very structured you'll begin to build a reputation
as someone who is very careful about how they manage themselves in their time like if you're doing
multi-scale planning certainly if you're doing you know pull-based workload management people are
going to start thinking this is someone who thinks a lot about like how they manage their work day
and how things happen this gives you massively way right yeah because we think what like our
colleagues want from us is accessibility but really why they want accessibility is because they have
no clarity about you know are we going to do this thing are we going to remember to do this thing
am I going to have to keep bothering you you know what if I don't really think you have your
act together I just wish you would just do this right away or respond to me right away because I'm
going to have to worry about this until I hear back from you that you did it like accessibility is
born from lack of trust or lack of clarity right so if you have the reputation of someone who really
has to act together you can for example lean into a shutdown I don't do email at all and people
they don't think that you're being lazy or that you're not keeping up with the work they're like no
like Andrew has his act together with this stuff I trust them when you show them something like
this workload management system like this is where the queue is like I can't get to this yet
like okay that's reasonable like you have your act together so there's this meta benefit
of starting to get a little bit more structured about your your time and cognitive work is that people
will give you more flexibility to work with the better you get at actually working with you know
the resources you have as your reputation grows your autonomy grows yeah and of course as your
reputation grows more gets thrown at you and it probably takes a bit more discipline to enforce
these things but I always remind myself and other people that you know that the reason people
want to access you is because of presumably the consequences of the deep work you did yeah not
um but people love meetings gosh to the um I won't do brainstorm meetings anymore unless it's
with my close team yeah it's like you can pitch me a contract yeah and we can reverse engineer
the idea you know um but it just doesn't work to to meet with people and kind of brainstorm stuff
it but I don't know what this is like I think maybe people are taking their own lack of structure
and um projecting it on to other people as a way to fill the time yeah it's pseudo productivity as
well like this is what I have like visible activity and so let's quit meetings let's talk let's
hop on calls like that all feels useful when ultimately it's not like I'm with you on it like
remember the reason why everyone wants to talk to me is because not I'm so great at brainstorming
meetings you know if you're like this is great like Andrew's great at brainstorming meetings so that's
why we want to bother no it's because you're really good at the podcast and you're doing like
the deep thing and then that brings in you know the better you get at what you do best the more the
world conspires to take away your time to actually work on it uh like professors know this well like
pre-tenure they most big universities are pretty good at preaching the professors all that's
going to matter is going to be your research but they throw a ton of other stuff at you at that time
it depends on the school like I was like Georgetown's very good about this they're like we don't
uh from our perspective it's a waste of resources to hire you and and have you not get tenure so like
we want to try to protect you from they keep service requirements low for example and like just
focus on you know just focus on your research because that's what's going to matter and at least
professors know this right like uh there's a clear process like the tenure process most people
don't understand tenure they think it's like getting promoted at a job and there's like all these
different ways you can sort of impress your boss it's none of that right I mean it's these
confidential letters from leading scholars in your field that are doing nothing but brutally
assessing your research how good is Cal who are two people who are better than him on the market
right now who are like two people he's slightly better than would you tenure him at your university
what university could he get tenureed at I mean it's all that matters is yeah research quality
um so you have to somehow rediscover what that is if you're not a professor like ultimately like
this is the thing I do best for my company so let me do that let me do that really well there's
also an aspect by the way of uh if you do a deep thing really well that does not attract as much
work as if what you do is you're just really good at like responding to people's things to put
now fires it's like you don't want to get too much trapped in that game unless that's the game you
want to play you know if you get trapped in the game of how I distinguish myself as I reply right
away doesn't matter when it is I make your life easier you're playing the game and making other
people's lives easier and that's what they're going to ask you to do but if instead you play the game
of I'm competent with this like I'll respond to the emails and not be uh I won't be pathological
about it but the real thing you care about is like this code on producing these reports on producing
are just really second to none then you're not going to get a much of the small stuff they're like okay
we'll do that then you know like that's what we want that's what we want you to work on so like
what is your equivalent of research is probably a really key question for a lot of people
how do you treat um social engagements through work like you know like the company barbecue
I don't know anyone does company barbecue is anymore but um you know like happy hour or I don't
know anyone does that either um and social engagements with family like you know because obviously
those things are important too yeah um are those on your schedule well you know I treat uh
work schedule different from non work schedule right so my work schedule is this time block plan
part of a multi-scale plan um really dialed in like when I'm working I'm working right um but
then when I'm not working I'm way more lax you know so I don't do time block planning of my weekends
or my evenings uh the work shutdown being clear gives you more flexibility there so it's like okay
what do we want to do like let's go like see these people see these things with the family um I like
to be flexible and not overly planned outside of the workday but then during the work day itself
you know it's much more machine like so you're you're fairly um not lax but you're a bit more
relaxed around social engagements and engaging with the kids but yeah at work or when you're working
at home or in the office you're you're obese yeah I'm like a black box in the workday like when
I'm working like I disappear nice yeah and then what I'm done like I'm around but like my family
and friends and they've learned like if you text me during the workday I'm I'm not part of that
game of like I'll just respond back to it people know like it may have been four hours since I
saw my phone it's like likes freedman yeah and people often ask to get in touch with lax and I've
you know made that connect for a few people but I always point out you know
let's go go long periods of time where we don't connect and then we're close close friends we
spent a lot of time in person on the phone text but I understand that if I text lax I might not
hear from them for four or five days and it's all good yeah yeah you know it's just yeah in fact
that that tells me he's good it's like that that scene at the end of goodwill hunting where he's
like I just want to show up at your house you're not there and you get there and he smiles as
friends gawney knows he went the direction of of his of his heart so you're saying if you start
to get a lot of like memes texted to you from lax that's not gonna happen you're gonna be like
what's going on less that's never gonna happen what struggle let's struggle are you having
in your life right now yeah I'm a big believer in the phone I'm old school pick up the phone
make a call we'll get on a call sometimes FaceTime we do text one or two things back for us often
really quick yeah really quick and I have other friends in the podcast space for which it's the same
as just phone is a great tool yep and you know drop in and then get back to it yeah not a lot of
cheater chatter on I like that I always like text is like a great logistical tool you know like
wait what what restaurant are you at oh you know okay I'll meet you there or it can't are you
free to talk like I love text as a logistical tool but you're right as a conversational tool yes
not from either and do you take vacations where you are on pure vacation so just with family or
or maybe even solo or with your spouse whereas like no digital anything uh yeah digital's not a
prompt for me on vacation but my wife won't let me not bring something to work on a vacation
because because I become a monster got it your brain needs that it needs it yeah when we have
little kids I tried this right it's like okay like this is it I'm not gonna think about anything
like this is and I would just become like an anxiety case so what I've learned is bring one thing
it's like very deep and non-urgent like a book concept I'm trying to make work or an academic paper
that was like trying to crack or like something new and I need like that 90 minutes a day to like
walk on the beach and think and I have to have a notebook I have it with me in here I have to have
a notebook with me so that like I can capture notes and get them out of my head on vacation and that
now we have a happy medium like I work a little bit every day no email I don't get that email not
no deep work thinking uh I'm much happier it's like an itch that you have to scratch yeah if I'm
not writing or thinking it's it's I get cognitively antsy I get anxious you know like I'm on I've been
now I'm talking to you now but I've been you know traveling doing some podcasts and stuff like
this and I'm way out of my cognitive comfort zone here because I'm not vlogging like early in this
trip I was a New Yorker in Atlantic deadline like writing all the time you know in California time
up at 5 a.m. like you know and I'm done with that now and I'm really cognitively antsy like I
just feel out of sorts right now you know like I'm not working I'm not thinking love it
Cal for me this has been such an honor I mean I should have said this at the beginning of the
episode but I've been such a fan for such a long time um long before we met or communicated at all
uh I started reading your books and um I would say you and Tim Ferriss of the people who
are really in my academic career had such a profound influence on how I approach work and
and it required that I do things um kind of against the grain people around me and very quickly I saw
um that I was making progress much faster than I would have otherwise yeah and I never looked
as a competitive endeavor with others but and um you just continue to churn out
valuable information actionable tools you know book and after book after book and um and obviously
they require some structure and some some restriction but also some moving toward um action items
and I love these these top three that you provided us on the pull forward the um multi-scale planning
and the and the shutdown ritual and all all the others on the you put forth and I guess that the
um major takeaway for me today is is that yes you've developed all these tools but you also use them
and um it's not lost on me that you also have a flourishing career as a computer scientist
so you're not just somebody who talks about and here I'm not dissing anyone else in the in the
information sphere like just talks about habits or just talks about protocols you do these things
and you implement them in the context of your work life your creative life your family life
in your relationship to self and you exercise and um and I think that that all combines to to
be an amazing example of what's possible if we introduce um a bit of understanding about how we
function as a as a being um and that we implement some of these tools in in the user manual that
that you've come up with and so I just want to say on behalf of myself and everyone who's listening
and watching you know thank you so much this is incredibly valuable information regardless of what
one is doing in life and um I'm certainly going to implement this um three step uh system and
I do have the book I was like to read books after guests are on I'm going to read the book um and
I'm going to do some posts about uh what I uh experience as a consequence so thank you so much
I would pay a substantial amount of money to do deep work sessions with you in the on the screen
there but I won't put that on you I'm just gonna I'm gonna just bite down and uh and do this stuff
so thank you so much for being a pioneer in the space and for such a clear communicator we all
owe you a debt of gratitude oh thanks Andrew well and for the rest of us professors who are also
podcasting we owe you a debt of gratitude because you're showing us what's actually uh what's actually
possible so this has been great meeting you as well has been fantastic all right well thank you we won't
um we won't see each other on social media but we'll we'll share a meal at some point before long
thank you for joining me for today's discussion with dr. cal newport to find links to cal's website
books and to his excellent podcast please see the links in the show note caption if you're learning
from and or enjoying this podcast please subscribe to our youtube channel that's a terrific zero
cost way to support us in addition please subscribe to the podcast on both spotify and apple and
on both spotify and apple you can leave us up to a five star review please check out the sponsors
mentioned at the beginning and throughout today's episode that's the best way to support this podcast
if you have questions for me or comments about the podcast or guests or topics that you like me to
consider for the huberman lab podcast please put those in the comment section on youtube i do read
all the comments not during today's episode but on many previous episodes of the huberman lab
podcast we discuss supplements while supplements aren't necessary for everybody many people derive
tremendous benefit from them for things like improving sleep improving focus and for hormone support
to learn more about the supplements discussed on the huberman lab podcast go to live momentus
spelled o us dot com slash huberman that's live momentus dot com slash huberman if you're not
already following me on social media i am huberman lab on all social media platforms so that's
instagram x linkedin facebook and threads and at all of those places i discuss science and science
related tools some of which overlaps with the content of the huberman lab podcast but much of which
is often distinct from the content on the huberman lab podcast so again it's huberman lab on all
social media channels if you haven't already subscribed to our neural network newsletter our
neural network newsletter is a monthly newsletter that includes podcast summaries as well as protocols
in the form of brief one to three page pdf's where we spell out specific items for say neuroplasticity
and learning or deliberate cold exposure or fitness or managing and optimizing dopamine all of which
are available completely zero cost you simply go to huberman lab dot com go to the menu tabs scroll
down a newsletter and supply your email i should point out that we do not share your email with
anybody thank you once again for joining me for today's discussion with dr cal new port and last
but certainly not least thank you for your interest in science