We must warn you that today's episode contains graphic descriptions that may be disturbing or triggering to some.
We will warn you as we approach those sections, but discretion is advised.
I was trying to look at her lips like I do my son and she was wording help.
They were vicious.
Like just help.
They were cruel.
Or call for help.
They inflicted all this harm for their own pleasure.
What would you think she meant?
They felt in control.
I don't know exactly.
They kind of got into a group mentality of let's all have this rage.
But I know in my mind, if I was in her state, calling for help.
This was the ultimate betrayal.
You witnessed her getting lit on fire?
Yeah, parts of the lit on fire, yeah.
I'm Scott Weinberger, investigative journalist and former deputy sheriff.
I'm Anastasia Nicolazzi, former New York City homicide prosecutor and host of Investigation.
Discovery's True Conviction.
And this is Anatomy of Murder.
If there's one word that would describe today's story, it is dark.
There is a sadistic quality to this crime not often seen.
For today's case, we interviewed Deputy DA Denise Yochum.
During my career, I've had a variety of cases gang cases, cold cases homicides, you name it.
I've tried it.
On July 15, 2011, the Riverside Sheriff's Department in San Bernardino County got a call.
There were some local hikers walking by and they noticed some legs partially sticking up from the ground.
The Riverside Sheriff's Department sent a deputy out there.
What they found was a partially buried body of a woman.
There were signs of animal activity and worse.
The body had maggots and insect activity.
The body was in a decomposition stage.
Now, detectives actually found a second grave site.
It looked like a grave had been started, but not completed.
And remember that fact, because it will be important later in our episode.
The area surrounding the body, there wasn't a lot of houses around.
There actually wasn't much at all.
It was a very remote area.
However, even though it was remote, it didn't mean that it wasn't frequented by a lot of people.
This tree is known as the party tree.
Many young people go drinking and smoking underneath that tree, so there's trash everywhere.
But there are dirt roads that lead to this tree, no paved roads.
It's out of the way.
You have to be local to know about this tree.
You know I could see Anasika, the remoteness of the area, why it would be attractive place not only to hang out as a teen but also unfortunately, to dump a body.
But the scene would need to be processed to determine that the location was just that a place where a body was either discarded, or whether the crime actually occurred there.
What'd you think?
You know, one of the questions always is where you find a body.
Often equates to where a homicide occurred, but also not always.
And we know that in many cases.
And here, you know, usually when you have an area like this where someone has gone to the lengths to bury the body at least to me Scott, and what I've seen that usually means the homicide didn't occur there, or at least not where the body was found.
Once the crime scene was set up, investigators from the coroner's office prepared the body for removal and transport, and the autopsy of that body would be the key first step in this investigation.
Dr. Holt, the forensic pathologist, conducted the autopsy on July 20, 2011.
And the body really told investigators so much about what had happened to this young woman.
But how the body was left and how long the body may have been out.
There are two important keys that will come out of that autopsy.
He said there was animal activity and maggots on her body and the passage of time destroyed potential evidence.
He said decomposition had taken place and her skin was slipping off her body.
Once they washed the mud and the dirt off her body, they saw things like the redness that was still there and different indicators on her skin that this young woman had been burned when she was still alive.
He also noted a head injury, which was consistent with blunt force trauma to the head.
He said she had not eaten for several hours.
She was extremely dehydrated.
And when they did a toxicology, you know looking for any drugs in her system, because again, they're trying to figure out what caused her death.
They did find one drug in her system, but it was an anti-seizure medication.
And while the medical examiner could not give a definitive cause of death, what he was able to do is rule this a homicide.
And this is not that uncommon, right?
Because she's been out there for a while.
They can't really tell what.
But just look at the various injuries.
You had signs of being burned before she was killed.
You have the blunt trauma.
You have other indicators of recent injury.
And then, of course, she's found buried.
He said it was because she was buried and she could not have killed herself and then buried herself.
So when they put that together, they can tell that it's a crime and thus equating homicide.
Her fingerprints were able to help them determine her identity.
Her name was Christine Jo Huntsman, but her friends called her by her nickname, CJ.
CJ.
CJ was a 45-year-old woman.
She was single, but she had a lot of friends, and her friends described her as everything from loving and kind.
But all of them that were interviewed at different times talked about she was someone that was always so helpful to her friends and those in need.
Since childhood, CJ suffered from petite mal seizures that would temporarily cause her to slur words and also become somewhat incoherent.
Some friends described her as sometimes a bit naive.
There might be a slowness to what she could perceive and when.
And that fed into her financial affairs.
So she could work, but she only worked part time and she was able to receive Social Security disability payments regularly.
Definitely for the seizures and how that incapacitated her at times, but also maybe for something more that we don't know exactly, any sort of diagnosis.
But she also was given financial help from her father.
Christine's dad lived in Nevada.
He was the one that helped her with her finances.
He actually helped her financially, but he also helped her take care of bills and make sure that she was always okay.
And with that, they had regular communication.
CJ's body was found on July 15th, but her father had last heard from CJ six weeks earlier, on May 30th.
For homicide detectives, those first six weeks are key.
Piecing together what happened, the who the, where it would lead investigators to witnesses and maybe even a killer.
And it all starts when the father first noticed that something was terribly wrong with CJ.
He could no longer get a hold of his daughter by phone.
Strange people were answering her phone.
She wasn't calling him back.
He began to worry.
Anastasia gets one thing to know that the dad thought she was living alone.
Now to have these people, these strange people, answering the phone that he wasn't able to recognize and then asking them to have her call him, and that call never take place.
Exactly, because you start to wonder who are these people?
Are they friends, or do they actually have something to do with her disappearance?
He knew this wasn't like her.
He always managed her bills and talked to her every week.
He became concerned and he filed a missing persons report.
So the first thing investigators did was try to find friends or people that might be able to give some information about when CJ was last seen.
Two of the neighbors in the apartment complex.
Both told police they had seen CJ on Memorial Day weekend at the apartment complex.
One witness said she was wearing a hoodie and was covered in bruises.
They were quickly led to an apartment that they were told that she spent a lot of time in with some of her friends.
And the man that lived in the apartment was named Michael Perez.
He lived there with his girlfriend and a child that they had.
And he quickly told investigators that he and CJ had known each other for years.
CJ had spent a fair amount of time with Michael Perez at his apartment complex, the Pepper Tree Apartments, located in the small city called Banning that is within Riverside County.
The Peppertree apartment building is an average apartment building.
Working class people live there.
Young people live there.
Detectives interviewed Perez.
He said he had no idea where she was, that she left their apartment.
And as far as he knew, she was going to Nevada to go see her dad.
And here's where the timeline gets more puzzling.
As far as anyone knows, CJ was alive on May 30th.
So was she then killed the next day on the 31st?
Detectives ran CJ's credit cards, and they got a hit.
It turns out her card had been used at a gas station in the city of Banning in Riverside County.
Now, there are two things to note.
First, the gas station is not far from where Michael Perez's apartment is.
And the second, it was used after she was reported missing.
So investigators have a couple of scenarios here.
On the one hand, it's a clue that might indicate that something happened to CJ after she filled up gas.
But on the other hand, it's just a credit card hit.
There's no indication that it was CJ herself that physically swiped the card.
So was CJ murdered and then robbed?
Or maybe she was killed in a robbery gone wrong.
So, since Michael Perez was a name that kept coming up to investigators, he was the one that they started with.
And they started to look not only at his relationship with CJ but at the others in his life as well.
So, in finding out a little bit more about the man that they're speaking to, Michael Perez, they found out that he was living with this woman who he had a child with, and her name was Virginia Backland.
So of course they're going to speak with her too.
But they also found out that he had a relationship with another woman as well, who he also had a child with, and her name is Desiree James.
We found evidence that it was a consensual three-way relationship.
And you know, as far as the relationship between these three, you know, it's like whatever floats your boat.
But it does play into the interpersonal dynamics between them.
James had her own apartment, but spent a significant amount of time with Perez and Backlund at their place.
And it didn't take long on July 25th, both Backlund and James were interviewed by detectives.
And they all described the demeanor of these women, not only with them but with one another, as less than cordial.
The two women were very obnoxious and rude with the detectives.
Backlund said she didn't want CJ in her apartment because she smelled and asked her to leave.
James told detectives she told CJ, don't ever come back and see us lose our number.
And this is where the investigation takes its kind of first turn.
And it comes through the voice of Backlund.
They interview Backlund and she says that she has no idea where Christine is.
And she introduces another person that raises suspicion.
We already know of four people.
Our victim, CJ.
Her friend, Michael Perez.
The two women Perez was dating that were in his life whose last names were Backlund and James.
And here's number five.
CJ's ex-boyfriend, Troy.
Backlund says that possibly her boyfriend Troy hurt her and that she'd had a seizure at their house, but left.
Backlund and James pointed the finger at Troy, saying that he was abusing CJ and that he was responsible for her murder.
So now it is you know separately, independently.
They're all saying I don't know.
The only other person they can think of is this boyfriend.
Well, ding, ding, ding, of course, investigators are going to have to look there.
But they're also looking more closely at the relationship not only of these three people with one another, but their relationship with CJ.
Second time detectives interviewed Perez.
He says maybe her ex-boyfriend Troy killed her because she was afraid of him.
And, you know, when I heard that, I'm thinking to myself, it really can only mean two things.
It's absolutely the truth or it's a complete misdirect.
I mean, they all had an opportunity to confer with each other.
But, you know, the stories were very similar.
And I think police needed to look at both of those paths.
And they did, but all they have is a first name.
They have to find out who this guy is and then start to see where he was, at least the time that they believed that CJ had gone missing.
But as they are starting to look at the friendship between Michael and CJ, they start to find out some things that really turn their heads.
Now, they had known each other for a while, but there were indicators that the relationship was in no way equal and certainly not healthy.
There may have been some mistreatment of CJ at the hands of Michael during this quote unquote friendship that they had.
She had hopes that he would fall in love with her.
She'd been friends with him for years.
They spoke to Christine's landlord and asked him when was the last time he saw Christine.
And he said it was in April and that she had a bruise on her eye and she was in the company of Michael Perez.
So, just to be clear, we're not talking about bruising right at the time that CJ went missing, but through the time frame that CJ had been friends with this group.
So police were thinking at that moment that that could be correlated to a domestic violence situation over a period of time.
They all knew Perez was mistreating CJ and they saw the bruises on her.
And CJ kept saying, I ran into a door, I fell down.
CJ didn't want to say it was Perez, but they all knew it was Perez and that he was using her.
She had a car, she had money, she helped them out.
And so it was CJ's passion for Michael Perez that may have been driving her to spend as much time as she wanted with Perez and the other two women.
So there really are, Scott, these two different paths.
And you could really just go back and forth, right?
I mean, how many times have you heard that there is an ex who just can't let go, or who comes back for revenge for one reason or another?
But then we're hearing these things that, if true, are deeply disturbing as well.
Investigators did know that CJ's credit card was used on June 2nd and June 3rd at a local convenience store.
But it's the items that were purchased on that day that were very concerning to investigators.
Mobile like wheelchair was purchased and alcohol, bleach and rubber gloves.
I mean unfortunately, Scott.
It takes us down a road that we think that we kind of know where the direction of this investigation may turn.
Yeah, I mean, if I was pulling those receipts through a warrant and I found it was a couple of bags of chips and a soda, I wouldn't be as concerned.
But think about these items.
You know, we have a body buried out in the desert.
And now we find items that were purchased weeks before her body was located.
And these items are something that we in our business would consider tools to potentially cover up a crime.
But the question is, who was it that was buying those items?
They did a search warrant and they found out that it was Perez and James who had purchased those things.
So now that investigators know who purchased the items, they also want to know where was CJ's car, because they knew that was the transportation that she used.
Not only did she use it for herself, but she was asked to drive others around all the time, including Michael, the different friends that they had of this group.
They all basically looked at her as the driver when they needed to go places.
But her car was nowhere to be found.
Detectives create a flyer with information about CJ, and they put a photo on that flyer of CJ.
The detectives left the flyers on various car windows in the apartment complex of Perez, Backland and James.
A witness said they saw a female removing the flyers from the windshields.
Clearly, someone didn't want people coming to police with more information about what they knew.
But the real first development now in the case would have to do with the recovery, as you said, of CJ's car.
The car was found about a quarter of a mile away from the apartments.
But when they found her car, it led them somewhere, but not where they had expected.
Because the back windshield is smashed, there's still items there.
But then they're led to other people that they had never heard from before that had tried to use some of CJ's property, including her registration, to try to register her car in their name.
What was interesting is someone had broken into the car, smashed the window.
They had left CJ's purse and credit cards in the car and the car keys.
So you know, Scott.
The question then is was this a crime of opportunity or do these two have something more to hide?
Yeah, I mean we've seen this movie before in other homicide investigations, where a vehicle which is tied to a victim of a crime is left, or is taken by the defendant and left somewhere, only to be broken in because it's just sitting there and no one seems to be recovering it.
And all of a sudden, we've got fresh prints in that car and we've got evidence in that car.
You know and you're thinking well, this is connected to the person who killed my victim.
And that always is an unfortunate part of an investigation which takes you down a road that you really don't go because it's not connected.
And that's exactly what happened in this case.
Another guy comes and breaks into the car and his girlfriend takes the purse.
They interviewed him and determined they had no idea who CJ was and that they had never met her or seen her or knew she had been murdered.
They were trying to sell the car to get money and they were trying to use her credit cards to buy things.
And so while they closed that loop, next they moved on to trying to find the ex-boyfriend.
Investigators already knew that they would need to locate and question the ex-boyfriend Troy.
CJ's family told them that they believed that she had not seen Troy in quite some time.
But investigators still wanted to find out for themselves if her ex could actually be involved.
Troy told the detectives he had not seen CJ in over 20 years.
They were able to confirm his alibi that he lived nowhere near CJ and CJ's family said they were not aware of CJ having any contact with Troy.
So while investigators have these interesting question marks, they're all leading to brick walls.
The people who had taken things from her car, boom, nothing to do with the murder.
The boyfriend, boom, not involved in her murder.
So now they're left with that receipt and these items that certainly seemed like somebody was up to no good.
And when they looked at those items, the people that had gone and purchased them Perez, Backlund and James.
Now, while that's going to put them right at the top of investigator suspect list, it's very far from being enough to make an arrest.
But the frustrations in this case were not going to stop there, because something really unfortunate happened soon afterwards.
Tragically, the lead detective died in a car crash unrelated to his work.
So other detectives had to pick it up.
It really threw the case in a holding pattern.
And there's so many other murders going on.
They're just jumping from murder to murder.
As you know all too well, Anastasia, getting a case reassigned happens all the time.
And in most instances it's one investigator being promoted or moving into a different assignment or even retiring.
Then there are those few cases where unfortunately a member of the service passes away.
But anytime a new investigator catches a case, it's a matter of getting read into the file And then to begin to determine how he or she is going to handle moving the ball forward at the time that they actually take full possession of that investigation.
And while we don't exactly know all the moving parts to what happened here, the case unfortunately did sit and we're not talking for just months.
CJ's murder became a cold case and did not advance at all for four years.
But then out of nowhere, a call comes in from someone the police would never expect.
And she told police that she witnessed the murder of CJ Kuntzman.
You don't just have someone calling to say that they witnessed the homicide.
You have Virginia Backland, one of the two people who, together with Michael Perez, was known to have bought the items.
Remember, bleach, gloves, rubbing alcohol, a wheelchair.
And now she's calling after years have gone by.
You know, we always talk about how a case goes cold because of a lack of evidence witnesses, even sometimes resources.
The case can sit for decades, but in some times, time is a positive factor.
And here's what I mean.
People who may have had a reluctancy to come forward at the time of the murder may have a change of heart years later and they could break a case wide open.
And that also relates to potential accomplices or co-defendants.
And it often comes down to one of two reasons.
A relationship may have changed, where someone may have been close to someone and now they're not or something else happens that they feel more free to speak.
Or it also happens that someone finds himself in trouble and uses their information almost as a bargaining chip.
And in this case, both those things were at play.
Backlund contacts the police.
She's no longer living with Perez and James.
She's now moved on to a new relationship.
However, Child Protective Services is threatening to take her new child away.
So she decides, if she contacts the police and lets them know about a murder, maybe Child Protective Services will be easy on her.
And Backlund had a story to tell.
She had firsthand knowledge about who murdered CJ.
She said that CJ was in their bathtub, in the bathroom, being tortured by Perez and James.
She did admit to some involvement in helping that happen.
She also told detectives something they didn't know, which was CJ was beat near the oak tree three days before she died.
Two other people could also add something to this story, and their names were Tabitha and Natasha.
They were two friends of Perez's.
We have a lot of names here, but really what we need to focus on this.
We know that CJ is the victim.
We're talking about Perez, James and Backlund.
It's Michael Perez with the two women in his life, James and Backlund.
Then you have these two other women, friends of theirs, Natasha and Tabitha.
So basically, the story that they're told is that all five of these people had been out there with CJ by the oak tree and that they had taken turns hitting her while they were out there.
And here's one of those moments that, once again, we want to give our listeners a warning about the brutality that you're about to hear.
After they did that, they all left the oak tree.
CJ left with James, Perez, and Backlund in her car.
They made her drive them back in that same car back to the apartment, and the abuse continued from there.
They started yelling at her and hitting her more.
They placed CJ in the tub, poured scalding hot water on her.
This is the voice of Virginia Backlund and some of her conversation with police.
You witnessed her getting lit on fire?
Yeah, parts of the lit on fire, yeah.
We have to stop here for a moment.
We are talking about what was done to another human being.
And while all of this actually happened, we are going to skip some of the most graphic portions.
Suffice it to say.
Beyond the things that we have and will talk about, CJ was also denigrated in ways we don't want to report.
They start to do things like that waterboarding treatments, that torture you have heard about in the movies, and that happens sometimes at war.
Then they just kept hitting her and wouldn't let her get out of the bathtub.
This really is mob mentality feeding off of one another in the cruelest of ways.
Backlund held a knife to her throat and, over a course of three or more days, she started to die slowly.
Every day, just losing consciousness and going downhill.
So I was trying to look at her lips like I do my son, and she was wording help.
Like just help or call for help or get some help.
What did you think she meant?
I don't know exactly, but I know...
More maybe thinking in my mind if I was in her state, calling for help.
And they wiped CJ's body down with rubbing alcohol because they'd watched CSI and they knew they had to get rid of the evidence.
It's just, it's inhumane.
Even repeating what happened here is completely sickening.
So let me step back for one second in the midst of this evil torture and remind us all that these people were her friends.
She went out of her way to do things for them, gave them money, bought them food, drove them where they wanted to go.
You know, we've said this before, loved to be loved, want to be loved.
This is how they ended her life.
Over three days, this is the treatment that she received.
You know all of this.
There is just one word that keeps coming to mind, and that is sadistic right.
What is sadism?
It's like deriving pleasure from inflicting pain and humiliation on somebody else.
And each one of these acts that they are committing against this defenseless woman is It's just inhumane, but it's going on until she finally loses that final consciousness and likely dies.
You know, Anastika.
As you know, in some cases we have an assault which happens within a matter of seconds.
And sometimes in those cases a defendant would say it was in the heat of passion or it was a split-second mistake.
That doesn't make them any less responsible for their actions.
But in this case, to have her in the tub for days without getting her help.
I think it says a lot about the people who are responsible for these despicable acts and, in my opinion, how the judicial system should treat them.
Well, I don't even think it wasn't just getting her help.
They were continuing the abuse and the torture for days.
And when she would cry or when she would be loud or anything, they would come back and inflict some more pain.
I haven't seen many cases like this before.
I have handled ones unfortunately, just like it, which is just sickening to me that there are like-minded people in the world like this.
But you know, this is right now a story being told and investigators can't rely on just the words of one person.
Because remember, she comes to them because she is in her own trouble.
She's no longer in a relationship with Perez.
Additionally, she is having Child Protective Services threaten to take her child away.
So police need to go out and see if they can corroborate these words.
They were shocked, but they also felt Backlund had more to do with it than she said.
They thought she was minimizing her involvement.
So the next step was the detectives looked for Natasha and Tabitha, because they'd never heard of these two people.
The investigators also decided that it was time to contact Denise at the district attorney's office.
Even if I have these confessions, it's not going to be enough.
I have to have something else.
I have to have some other evidence.
And investigators did ultimately track down Tabitha.
She wanted no part of them, at least in the beginning.
But then slowly that changed.
She finally came forward and told them exactly what she had seen.
Tabitha said she never met CJ before, but CJ was nice enough to give her a ride, as she was the only one who had a car and the only one who had money within that group.
Tabitha needed a ride home from work that day and Perez ordered CJ to pick her up from the job, and it was during that ride home Tabitha claimed that CJ was driving erratic, running a stop sign, which really upset Tabitha.
So when she arrived at Perez's apartment, she told Perez CJ just ran a stop sign.
So they decided as a group, they were going to take her to the oak tree and beat her for doing that.
This as his motive for murder and torture.
You know, when I did a little more digging and reading into the case, it did sound like one of the children of one of these women was in the car.
But again, remember, first of all, we're talking about someone who has an issue with seizures.
But regardless, even if she went through the stop sign, there was nothing that any of them said to make them think that she was purposely putting any of them down in harm's way.
So Tabitha had told the investigators that she had mentioned to Perez that she thought that CJ was putting her life in danger by driving recklessly was because CJ may have been jealous with any woman that Perez may have been hanging around with and it was her way of getting back.
But either way, that was the very reason that four women and Michael Perez decided to go to that lone oak tree and take it out on CJ.
And as nonsensical as that reasoning is for any of us, Tabitha's story still was not over.
Tabitha actually went to the apartment building a couple days after the beat down at the oak tree and wanted to use their bathroom.
And they tried to stop her from going into the bathroom.
And she saw james walk out of the bathroom and walked right past her, went into the bathroom, closed the door and then all of a sudden she heard moaning and she pulled back the shower curtain and saw cj in the bathtub.
Tabitha is admitting to investigators that she was well aware of what CJ's condition was in that bathtub, but she chose not to dial 911 and not to get CJ help.
And this is one of those things that always jurors just, or anyone just, it's very hard to wrap their head around.
Why would she not have called the police?
So just if we take ourself out of this particular story for a moment well, the reasons are often things like self-preservation.
It could just be straight callousness.
It can be fear.
And investigators don't know enough to know yet what's at play here.
But they do know that, armed with this new information, it's time to bring Perez and James back to the precinct and sit them down again.
The question really would be who would be the first one to admit their involvement and what likely led to the death of CJ.
Those interviews were recorded and we have them here for you.
How are you holding up?
The audio quality is not great, but certain sections are better than others.
And during the conversation with Michael Perez, investigators wanted to know more about this waterboarding, about how he did it.
So where would you put the rag?
On her mouth.
And then what would you do?
Pour the water.
And pour the water where?
On top of her mouth.
James admits to participating in the murder of CJ separately and Perez admits to participating in the murder of CJ separately.
It really seems that it's Perez who is the driving force in all this.
Perez told investigators that he was well aware of CJ's affection for him.
He called it a fatal attraction.
He returned those feelings with emotional and physical abuse.
He called her the perfect wife, who supported him financially, providing him and his girlfriends with cell phones clothes food cigarettes, jewelry and anything else they wanted.
It was a story actually, that I read in one of the reports that at some point remember, CJ was always wanting to take care of others.
That she had asked her dad, who was pretty crafty, if he would build a storage dresser so that she could give it to Perez for a baby that he had recently had.
And her dad did.
And so CJ gave Perez this dresser that she had painted blue because she wanted to have it for his new son.
And it really talks about the heart that this woman had.
They all took advantage of a very vulnerable person.
All she really wanted to be was to be loved.
And here's where investigators did something interesting, something I haven't seen before.
Detectives then put them both in the same room and they corroborated their stories.
I can imagine the phone call to you Adesiga, after going through this interview, with both in one room and trying to explain to a prosecutor.
I'm like, wait, what did you do?
Yeah, I mean, trying to understand the tactic.
And you know, and certainly we weren't there, and I'm not judging anybody based on the decision that they made.
But it's an interesting tactic to take.
If it works, I'm not sure, but it's interesting.
So it's really like, why would they do that?
It's very interesting because you cannot use what one defendant says against another, which is why we very often have to have separate trials or multiple juries in one case, because you can't use what they say against each other.
And that really comes down to the right of confrontation without going deep into the legal rabbit hole.
Just think about it.
You know, they are there on trial.
You have the right to remain silent.
You don't have to put on any defense, but you're kind of confronted with someone else's words.
So what investigators did is like, hey, we could think of a workaround for this.
If these guys are willing to be together in the same room and talk to us.
Well, now they're together.
They can... answer with the other saying.
They can deny it.
They can correct it.
They can say, yes, that's what happened.
And that's exactly what they did.
So now they had in a way this gift that they could put this conversation between these two people in front of that same jury.
James and Perez for the most part, agreed on all of the acts of torture that happened to CJ.
But there were a few times where they disagreed about it.
James said that he had used lighter fluid on CJ and Perez said, no, it was rubbing alcohol.
James said she didn't feel like she could leave, and Perez told her why the door was unlocked.
You could have left whenever you wanted to.
They had a couple of differences and argued about it, but ultimately they both admitted that the three of them tortured and murdered CJ.
Remember, earlier in the show I talked about the fact that a second grave had been discovered and that would be an important fact within this story.
Well, here you go.
When James finally confesses, she says they tried to dig a grave near the tree but the ground was too hard so they had to move closer to the tree where the ground was softer.
You know Scott, when I heard this piece, I was like well, this is the key to the case, and that's how I would start my summation is that this shallow hole near the tree not the one that CJ was found buried in, but this one that was just this dirt kind of moved around on the ground well, that's how you know that all of what they're saying is what actually happened.
That was never put out in the press.
That was nothing that someone would have known but for being out there.
But investigators knew it was true because they had been out there processing this crime scene.
So it is one of these things that in and of itself, well, okay, she wasn't buried there.
Why does it matter?
Well, it means everything, because it shows the knowledge that only someone that was actually there would have.
I didn't have any physical evidence.
I didn't have any DNA evidence.
And in court, you can't just have a confession.
You need other things to corroborate what a suspect says.
After they had spoken to investigators and made these unbelievably sickening albeit admission statements Perez, James and Backlund were arrested and charged with the torture and murder of CJ Kunzman.
They were charged with murder and torture and the special allegation of life without parole.
So that special allegation is really just special circumstances.
What it means is that there is something else going on with the crime that changes or ups the level of charges or impacts sentencing in some way.
The first task for Diddy's was to contact CJ's parents to notify them to review the case and discuss the charges and potentially a sentence.
CJ's mom and dad were no longer together, so I had to call them each separately.
I spoke to them about seeking life without parole or the death penalty.
I thought that they deserved life without parole.
They tortured CJ for days, and then they did everything they could to cover up their crimes.
And the torture of CJ was horrific.
I've never seen anything so dark before.
CJ's mom was against the death penalty as well as her sister.
They felt that life without parole would be enough.
CJ's father said it was up to the district attorney's office and he didn't want to give any input as far as charges and sentencing.
Denise is a seasoned veteran prosecutor who has handled many a difficult case.
But this one, the depravity of what happened to CJ, probably rises near the top.
Somebody has to speak for victims, and I chose to speak for CJ.
She did not deserve any of this infliction of hits, burns, waterboarding.
The vulgarity of the things they were doing to her were shocking.
So Denise ultimately did multiple trials here because while there are three people going to trial for CJ's murder remember you have different statements.
And Beckland had her own trial.
Remember, she's not part of the statements when you had James and Perez together in the same room.
So Perez and James were tried jointly.
But at both trials, each woman, Beckland and her own, and James and hers both testified.
Backlund testified that she was a victim of domestic violence and she went along with everything because she was afraid Perez would kill her.
I cross-examined her and asked her about her background in the military, because she had been in the Army Reserves.
I asked her about all the training she received in regards to medical aid, treating burn victims, giving CPR, and she admitted she had taken all those classes but didn't use them.
You know, most experts will ultimately come out on that, even with abuse and control.
That doesn't excuse, certainly not legally, the conduct of taking part in these acts.
She hired a domestic violence expert to come testify about her IQ and about the effects of domestic violence on people and how they react differently than other people.
How, if at all, would it move jurors?
I mean me as just a human being, even as a prosecutor, like yes, I can have empathy for that, even the person sitting in the defendant's chair, but that doesn't equal an excuse or defense under the law based on everything that was seen.
At Perez's and James' trial, Tabitha testified for the prosecution and had a few things to add.
Additionally, Tabitha had testified the door was unlocked to the apartment.
The door to the bathroom was unlocked.
Tabitha said neither Backlund or James had any injuries on them.
She said they were acting like nothing was going on.
She said they didn't ask her for help.
She said they could have easily left the apartment.
Denise did ask the question that was undoubtedly on everyone's mind.
Why didn't she call the police?
When she testified at trial, I asked her, why didn't you call 911?
Why didn't you get help?
And she said that she regretted not doing that and that she had told all three defendants you need to get her help as she left the apartment.
And then she said she heard sirens in the background, so she just assumed they got help for CJ.
And interestingly, there is no requirement under the law to call the police.
You know, I've had cases that they've actually tried to instill legislation because people saw things as similar as you can to this.
You know, just horrific state of human beings that are still alive and people don't call the police for fear callousness, whatever the place would be.
And people just say, no, you have to call.
But there are constitutional issues and all sorts of issues why you can't require people to take this action.
So it really comes down to more of an ethical, moral obligation, but not legal.
Just based on the nature of CJ's injuries, it would be difficult for any jury to comprehend and for any prosecutor or member of law enforcement to work from crime scene to completion.
But certainly for Denise.
The nature, descriptions of the photographs, the testimony, it all was a concern for her when it came to the jury.
And when it got to their hands, how would they be able to process all of it?
Not once, but twice, I had to tell a jury about the depth of darkness of these three defendants.
They were vicious.
They were cruel.
In my opinion, they inflicted all this harm on CJ for their own pleasure.
They felt in control.
They felt like they could contain her in this bathtub and do whatever they want to her.
And clearly based on the trial itself.
It was difficult for all of them to hear not just the jury but the court staff, the parties being the attorneys, and even the judge.
The judge during the whole trial kept taking breaks.
It was tough for him.
It was tough for the court staff and the jury.
It was so heavy.
And the judge said that.
He's like, this is just so heavy.
We have to take breaks.
This is just a lot.
It's so difficult to imagine, as a juror, having to sit through for days going through these types of materials, seeing some of the photographs, the testimony, the interrogation audio with the defendants themselves.
It weighs heavily on anyone who's not used to seeing specifically these type of details and talking about the injuries and really seeing the way CJ lost her life over a period of three days.
It's just heartbreaking.
In her closing statements, Denise asked out loud why would anyone these defendants torture and kill CJ over perceived poor driving?
That's what I kept saying in my closing argument.
Just don't get in the car.
If you think she's a bad driver, you don't get in the car.
You don't torture and kill her.
The intention was always to kill her because at the oak tree, CJ was told this is where you're going to get buried.
Perez and James were found guilty.
Backlum was also found guilty of first-degree murder and torture.
In an unusual move, the jury went to the sentencing.
Some of the jurors showed up and they told me they wanted to see the case all the way through.
They told me that they felt so bad for CJ because of all the pain inflicted on her and they were shocked that the three defendants would do something like this to anyone.
They were so moved by this case that some of them went to the oak tree after the verdict because they wanted to see where CJ spent her time being buried before she was discovered.
They also said some prayers for her at that oak tree.
I was pretty moved when I read that, honestly.
I mean, we know that jury is a civil duty, but to sit through that case, all of the emotions involved and wanting to see what happens at sentencing, is pretty honorable.
At the sentencing, CJ's friends made victim impact statements, and they weren't the only ones.
So while they were giving their impact statements, they were struggling.
Every single one of her friends got up there and felt like they should have done more to protect CJ.
They felt they could have stopped this murder if they had done more for CJ.
And the judge addressed all of the friends and said look, we're never going to know why they did this, because there is no reason why.
This is the most heinous crime I've seen in my 25 years of practicing criminal law.
And there is no human reason for the evil that was conducted in this case.
I've never seen such horrific acts done on such a victim who was so innocent before.
It was quite clear throughout all of the testimony that all three defendants participated in a horrific act of torture towards someone who did nothing but want to be around them.
He said no one could have predicted this because no one expected CJ to be treated this horribly.
Tune in next week for another new episode of Anatomy of Murder.
Anatomy of Murder is an AudioChuck original produced and created by Weinberger Media and Forseti Media.
Ashley Flowers is the executive producer.
So, what do you think, Chuck?
Do you approve?
