Abercrombie denim is everything right now.
Denim should feel like this. Confident. Easy.
Like your butt has never looked better. If you didn't know, Abercrombie's Curve Love denim went viral in 2019 for eliminating waist gap. and it's still a game changer.
Between that and their classic fits with a straighter line from waist to hip, the perfect denim does exist.
Shop Abercrombie denim in the app online and in store.
Scientific American is turning 180. To celebrate, join our photo challenge, Siam in the Wild.
It's easy. Just snap a pic of any Scientific American print issue in a setting that reflects or complements the cover theme.
Then share it on social media using hashtag Siam in the Wild, tag Scientific American, and include your name and location. or you can email it over to us at contestsatsiam.com.
You could win a one year unlimited subscription, plus a bundle of awesome gadgets and gear to fuel your next adventure.
But hurry, entries close September 5th. Terms and conditions apply.
See official rules at siam.com slash 180contest.
That's siam.com slash 180contest. That link is also available in our show notes.
We can't wait to see where curiosity takes you.
For Scientific American Science Quickly, I'm Rachel Feldman.
An estimated 1 out of every 10 people in the U.S. has some kind of food allergy, which adds up to more than 33 million Americans.
Peanut allergies are among the most common and certainly take the lead as the most visible.
But peanut allergies weren't always so prevalent.
In the late 1990s, a nationwide survey found that peanut allergies were reported in .4% of Americans.
Just over a decade later, that number had more than tripled.
Scientists still aren't completely sure what led to this big uptick. but it could stem in part from parental anxiety over peanut allergies. and misguided advice about how to keep kids safe.
Here to tell us more about the latest research on peanut allergies, including new avenues for treatment and prevention, is Maren McKenna, the author of a recent article on the subject for Scientific American.
Marin is a journalist who covers food policy and public health. thank you so much for coming on to chat with us today thanks for having me So what do we know about the origins of peanut allergies?
This is a really interesting mystery situation.
Still, no matter how much study and how much research funding has gone into the problem of peanut allergy and food allergies more broadly, a lot of it still remains kind of opaque.
We know the biological mechanisms of what makes an allergy happen.
But why peanut allergy in particular came on the scene?
20, 30 years ago or so and why it blew up to such a major public health problem.
People are still working So I guess let's start with the easier question then, which is, what is a food allergy?
How does it work both genetically and in the moment in a person's body?
I think most people are familiar with the concept of having an immune system that through a variety of mechanisms defends our bodies against the outside world, broadly speaking, against things that are not us.
Most of the time, the immune system works really well to adapt its reactions, its defenses of us, to the way we continue to live our lives.
Sometimes it's reactions get wildly out of scale.
And That's what happens in food allergy and peanut allergy.
The immune system recognizes proteins in these foods as being sort of not self, not part of us. and mounts an extraordinary reaction. expresses itself in the kind of symptoms that if you're allergic you've experienced or that you may be familiar with from hearing about the them from other people.
Hives, itchiness, difficulty breathing, difficulty swallowing.
In the worst presentations, depressed people. blood pressure, inability to breathe, and sometimes in the worst case, a heart attack.
And what are the actual rates of nut allergy?
It's definitely one of the ones we hear about a lot, but how prevalent is it?
This can be a frustrating question to try to answer because what we know about people being allergic depends on their telling researchers that they're allergic.
So it's all self-reported. There are biological markers for allergy, but we don't apply tests for those biological markers to the entire population.
So all of the data relies on people telling researchers who have asked. that an allergy is present in themselves or in their kids if their parents are answering for children.
All of that said, the numbers are really big.
It's estimated that one out of every 10 10 individuals just in the United States has some kind of food allergy.
That's more than 33 million people. spoke to for this story said, if you think of the average size of a classroom, In elementary school, for instance, that means in every classroom, two to three kids are going to have food allergy.
And- Peanut is one of the most common food allergies.
It's actually probably not the most common, but it tends to be the one that we hear about the most if we have kids in school and They're aware that in the lunchroom there's a peanut-free table or...
If you get on an airplane and realize that you can't have peanuts on the airplane, because there might be an allergic person on the plane with you that day.
So peanut's very sort of front of mind. for a lot of people.
And why is that? Why do you think it's the one that we hear about the most?
Is that to do with the typical degree of the allergy.
The funny thing is that according to the best data, the number one food allergy, the most commonly experienced food allergy in the United States. is actually against shellfish and it affects in the most recent data, more than 8 million people, whereas peanut and milk allergies which are two and three affects a little bit more than six million but Most people don't stroll around their lives eating shrimp, right?
This is not a thing that for most of us that we munch walking down the street or eat in a protein bar.
But peanuts are incredibly portable. They're a favorite food for kids.
Peanut butter is pretty much ubiquitous.
And so peanuts are just present in our lives a lot.
But why peanuts cause such reactions is one of those enduring unanswered questions.
There are a lot of hypotheses advanced for why that is, ranging from the way that allergy happens in general, that there are things in the environment that are more present than they used to be or that the environments that we grow up in are cleaner, and so we tend to overreact to them.
Two, the ubiquity of ultra- processing in food, which might be distributing these proteins more broadly so that kids are exposed to them when they aren't aware that they're exposed to them.
Or it could just be that we like peanuts.
But as a result, for all of those reasons and probably others as well, peanut allergy is very present in the lives of families.
And it can be very serious. And speaking of the top food allergies in general, what are the big eight?
So the big eight, that's an actual legal term, and it indicates the allergens, the proteins that are present in food that when it's a processed food have to be declared on the label.
Up to 90% of food allergies are caused by these eight That's why they were made the subject of legislation back in 2004.
So peanuts, milk, eggs, fish, shellfish, tree nuts.
So things like almonds, for instance, wheat, and soybeans.
And there's actually a ninth, a sort of footnote to the big eight that was added just a few years ago, which is sesame.
So those nine allergens... are responsible for an enormous amount of food allergy in the United States.
And sometimes they're linked to allergies, like someone who has an allergy to peanut. might also be allergic to egg or to milk.
But as a category, they cause a great deal of distress.
And I know you touched on this a bit a minute ago but How much do scientists know about how we got to the point we are now with food allergies?
Why are they so prevalent? The question of why food allergies and peanut allergy within that is so common and seems to be getting more common at the base, like why this starts. is still really an unanswered question, but that it's, increasing.
No one disputes that. You can go by some sort of qualitative measures, like if you You are an adult who's been flying on airplanes for 30 years.
30 years ago, you might have been able to have a peanut snack. inside an airplane.
And you would not have heard a member of the cabin crew saying, If you brought peanut snacks on board, please do not eat them because there's an allergic person sitting somewhere near you. a nested set of surveys of the population. done over a couple of decades, made it really clear how food allergies are increasing.
The first was done in 1997. These were all done by researchers at Mount Sinai School of Medicine in New York City. and 11 years from the first study. the measurement in kids was 2.1%.
They started to ask about peanuts at that point.
1.4% of kids in the US were allergic to peanuts.
So that's a threefold increase across just 11 years, starting in the late 1990s.
That's really remarkable. Yeah. So your piece really focuses on treatments, even with all the remaining uncertainty around peanut allergies.
What did you find out about where science is making the most progress and how they're doing that?
Reporting this story was really a journey because I went into it being interested in one particular therapy that had been advanced just a couple of years ago.
It was the first FDA approved therapy for peanut allergy, not a cure, a method of desensitization.
This method of desensitization is a drug called Palforzia.
And what it actually is is minutely powdered peanut protein. that's given to kids in very precisely measured doses by mouth, over a period of time, and it's meant to desensitize them.
I was interested in it because I felt that it hadn't done very well in the marketplace.
And I wasn't sure if that was because of the dosing regime or because it happened to be introduced to the market at the start of COVID.
But I wondered if this was such a big problem.
Why hadn't this taken off? So I started to look at this and it turns out that there was a bunch more science. that I was not aware of.
And this one particular FDA-approved therapy, Palforzia, was only a small part of the story.
So the bigger story is that There have been really remarkable advances in desensitizing people to the allergy so that they can go from being in danger of anaphylactic shock to actually being safe to eat a small amount of peanut or peanut protein or peanut butter.
And exactly how small that small amount is depends in part on how allergic they were to begin with. have been made relatively safe from accidental exposures like cross contamination in food manufacturing.
Some people who were less allergic to start with, have actually been made safe enough to be able to eat peanuts or peanut butter if they want to.
Some researchers in this field will say we still aren't getting all that far.
We are making people safe in their lives, but they still have to be careful about what they're eating, They can't go face first into a jar of peanut butter.
I found as I was working on this story, there are other really interesting efforts going on to try to keep the allergy from developing and to effectively nullify the allergy once it has developed and those are sort of like the far horizons of food allergy science.
As it says in the story, they are things that people are beginning to explore.
Yeah. What's your sense of where things are going in the next few years?
So right at this moment, a clinical trial is starting that is really unusual, and it's extremely early days.
They are getting to just a phase one at this point.
Only one patient has actually been reported out.
But what it does is it uses a combination of drugs made by a company called Regeneron, to essentially reset or rewrite the body's understanding of what it's supposed to react to.
And there was research into the effect of one of these drugs.
The name for it is dupixent. And researchers gave this drug and then tested people with their allergy with the food they were allergic to, which was peanuts. and discovered that though it seemed promising, it didn't actually have a long-term effect.
And then they decided to try adding in a second drug, which has just been approved for a particular cancer.
cancer of the cells that make the antibodies that cause the body to overreact in an allergic situation.
They believe they can use that combination to cause the body to forget the that it's overreacted to a particular thing to essentially set the allergy back to zero, again, very early.
But if that trial which will take a number of years.
If that trial proceeds, That's a really promising avenue of inquiry.
The other thing that's really interesting and that's beginning to get traction is that there is a school of thought. based on a set of studies that were done in England that asks, Maybe food allergy, especially peanut allergy,
Maybe it's kind of our fault, because maybe we as a society are.
Not introducing children when their immune systems are developing to peanuts. at a time when their immune systems could handle them and not overreact to them.
And where this came from was an accidental finding by a British pediatrician who was speaking to a group of pediatricians in Israel.
And asked them how many of them were treating food allergic kids, expecting every hand to shoot up.
And in fact, almost no one did very few people in the audience. were actually treating allergic kids.
And this was a fascinating difference between the UK, where the scientist had come from and Israel, where he was speaking at the time.
And through a set of very clever experiments, they discovered that the difference was that there's ubiquitous snack in Israel called Bamba.
Yeah, it's also ubiquitous in Germany is inside.
I love Bombas. Yeah. Um, So they there's here in the United States and Trader Joe's, they make a Bomba equivalent.
I saw it the other day. So, for people who have not experienced them, Bombas are kind of like Cheetos.
They're a puffy, extruded product. But instead of cheese on the outside, they have peanut butter on the outside.
And they're very light and wispy and they collapse and they're easy to chew.
They're not as tough as a Cheeto. And Israeli kids, it turned out, get them quite early in life.
And so they were getting an exposure. to peanuts. at a time when the British kids were being held strictly away from peanuts because that was... the dominant advice.
At the time, this is just a few years ago, for any child in a family with a history of allergy was keep them away from allergen.
And so this pediatrician who led the study, Dr. Gideon Lack, proposed that if we sort of abandoned our current guidelines, if we started to introduce kids to peanuts very early, which takes some doing. because they have to be introduced to solids in time to be able to swallow peanut butter or peanut powder safely. then it seemed likely that they would be at less risk of developing allergy. and his research proved that was correct.
And now the public health establishment And pediatrics and pediatric nutrition are struggling with this conundrum of The excellent advice that seemed to keep kids safe for so long may actually have set some kids up for allergy instead, and how do we implement the new findings now that they exist?
Yeah, that's really interesting. My last question is just that you were really careful with the word cure in your story for Scientific American.
Do the research that you talk to seem to think that that's a possibility in the future?
Everyone is extremely careful around the word cure in this situation, and I respect that.
Thank you. They're careful about it for a couple of reasons.
First, even the most optimistic researchers to whom I spoke. are clear in saying that when they do these various new modalities of desensitization.
That's all they're doing. They are not curing the allergy, but they are making it safer for people to live everyday lives.
And the second is these other avenues in which the allergy might actually be remodeled.
Those are such early days that whether it's actually going to work in broad populations, either the very early feeding or this drug administration.
It's way too early to make confident statements about them.
But I think also the reason that they're so careful about this word cure is because There are so many families out there, families of millions of kids in the United States. have had their lives disrupted by food allergy, especially peanut allergy. it really profoundly changes the life, not just of a child, but the life of a family.
And therefore... Families are very eager for something dramatic to happen, and no one wants to overpromise.
Even though they believe they see real hope coming over the horizon, it's too early. for them to say with confidence that it will really change the game.
Thank you so much for coming on to talk us through this story.
I'm sure our listeners will enjoy checking it out in the magazine. i hope they read it thank you so much for having me that's all for today's episode we'll be back on monday Signed Quickly is produced by me, Rachel Feltman, along with Fonda Mwangi, Kelso Harper, and Jeff Del Vecchio.
This episode was edited by Alex Sugiara.
Shana Posas and Aaron Shattuck fact-check our show.
Our theme music was composed by Dominic Smith.
Subscribe to Scientific American for more up to date and in-depth science news.
For Scientific American, this is Rachel Feltman.
Have a great weekend. Thank you. Amazon presents Scotty vs. Geology 101 paper.
A mountain of an assignment, the geology 101 paper can turn an all-dayer into an all-nighter. an all-nighter into an all-morninger.
But Scotty shopped on Amazon and saved on a laptop, sticky notes, and a mini fridge full of energy drinks.
Hey, paper. Scotty's got you on the ropes.
Carbon date. Save the everyday with College Deals on Amazon.
