Obviously in hindsight, when you look back at all these cases, there's a few things you would have done differently.
There are a couple things in this case where I would have done things differently.
I want to get the ambulance in route two, okay?
Hold on.
But it all worked out at the end.
I'm Scott Weinberger, investigative journalist and former deputy sheriff.
I'm Anastasia Nicolazzi, former New York City homicide prosecutor and host of Investigation.
Discovery's True Conviction.
And this is Anatomy of Murder.
In researching today's story, there were the multiple headlines that you would expect in a high-profile case.
And they had all the details that you're used to seeing as you look at the front page on the news.
But one of the things I really appreciate about our podcast is that we are able to go deeper and talk about the things that really go on under the surface in all these crimes.
And it's thanks to Scott's contacts down in Florida that we are able to bring you today's story.
Today we're featuring a case from the West Palm Beach Police Department, an agency I covered extensively when I left law enforcement and began my career as a TV reporter at the ABC station in West Palm.
I can tell you this.
It is one of the premier police agencies in the country.
So today's case is a great example on how teamwork clears cases.
A team led by the man you're about to meet.
I'm Sergeant Dennis Hardiman.
I'm with the West Palm Beach Police Department.
So West Palm Beach is just about an hour north of Fort Lauderdale.
It is a city which sits between the intercoastal and the ocean.
Lots of people know West Palm because right over the bridge is the island of Palm Beach.
And people may be familiar with the fact that Mar-a-Lago is there and that's constantly in the news these days.
But West Palm is a progressive city.
Its primary income is tourists.
We have SunFest in the summertime.
We obviously have spring training baseball here.
So we do have an influx in February, March when spring training is here.
But the case we're talking about today didn't happen during the peaks of spring or summer, but just days before Christmas.
On December 22nd, 2012, shots rang out in an affluent part of the city.
It was approximately 1 p.m. and our dispatch operations received a frantic 911 call from a male.
911, where are you?
Somebody just shot somebody on Olive and, oh my God, Rustland or Rylan Drive.
The person that shot, I don't know.
He's on the ground.
He's dead.
He's dead.
The guy shot him in the head.
He shot him like four or five times.
It was a guy on a bike and the kid, the guy was like younger.
Other calls started to come into the 911 center, reporting the same murder.
We drove by.
There's a guy on a bicycle.
He was laying out.
He looks like he got shot, and we heard gunshots.
911, where's your emergency?
We're at South Olive and Edmore, and there's a lady that had fallen on her bike, I guess.
We had five gunshots came around the corner and the guy's laid out with bicycles stolen and everything.
He's laying there, not moving.
And did you see who was shooting?
You can hear the frenzy in the caller's voice, and while they're trying to be as specific as possible, it is that panic that almost gets in the way of accuracy.
Because remember, here they first reported that it was a black man that had been shot, but ultimately we learned that the victim was a woman.
She's black.
Black female?
She was on a bike?
She was on a bike.
She was laying on the ground.
Talk to me for a second here, okay?
The person that was shot, how's he doing right now?
He's dead, man.
I'm telling you.
I'm not going near him.
He's dead.
He's dead.
He's dead.
He shot him in the head, man.
I am so freaked out.
I've never seen anything like that.
I completely understand.
Now the clock really is ticking here, and it's not just because law enforcement is responding to a homicide, but it's because the witnesses spotted the gunmen fleeing.
Okay.
He was able to provide the responding officers and also dispatch the description.
Black male, 20 to 40 years old, wearing dark pants.
He had on like a shiny mid-thigh brown leather jacket.
He had a beard, a few days growth.
I believe he had some type of stocking type hat on the top of his head.
The 911 operator's job is to get critical information from this eyewitness and translate that into action.
Dispatch officers who, even before arriving on scene, can direct other officers to establish a perimeter and flood the area.
You have officers basically going door to door, house to house, looking for someone based on the information that was given to 911.
And in this case the description was pretty specific.
He didn't seem very tall, so i mean i thought it was a kid okay, you know, not like a 10 year old or anything, but he just he didn't look like an older man or anything.
The witness, still on 9-1-1, tried to give the best description he could.
He was visibly and audibly upset.
Okay, i want you to stay with me.
Don't hang up ma'am, i am freaked out.
Hold on.
I've never.
I want to get.
I want to get the ambulance in route too.
Okay, hold on.
So I've personally been the officer on scene establishing a perimeter at a scene of a homicide.
In some cases, we were able to locate and arrest the offender.
But in other cases they were able to slip out of the perimeter or were already outside the box before it was even established.
As responding officers, they set up a large perimeter.
We had canine was out there.
The Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office utilized their helicopter to help us search.
Obviously, after an exhaustive search, nothing was located at that time.
No suspect was located.
Now, without finding their suspect initially, this manhunt quickly turned to a murder investigation.
And that's where Dennis Hardiman and his team stepped right in.
I got a call at approximately 1 when this happened, and I was on scene about 45 minutes later.
I have six detectives that work directly under me.
If I needed more, I could have eight to ten detectives out there at the scene working on the case.
Now they know the victim is a woman.
She was initially described, as Anastasia said, by the 911 operator as a man.
The confrontation happened while she was still sitting on her bicycle.
She was shot multiple times, including in the head.
You could tell from the direction of her bicycle.
She was riding on the sidewalk.
She had on a backpack over her back.
This suspect had stopped her.
Looked like they were having a verbal argument.
And the male pulled out a handgun from the inside of his jacket and shot the female in the head.
She was shot three times.
There was no physical confrontation where it would lead to any potential fingerprints or DNA.
They did have the three spent shell casings and they were nine millimeter cartridges.
Well, the early theory was this was possibly a robbery.
The bicycle had a basket on it.
The basket was empty.
We didn't know if maybe there was something she was carrying in the basket.
Or the other theory was that this was somebody she had met, got into an argument with and he shot her.
Those were our two main theories in the beginning.
In a neighborhood like this, such a heavy residential area, getting out on foot is the best method in the search for leads.
Investigators began knocking on doors, talking to neighbors.
It could be something as simple as a vehicle that just didn't look like it belonged on that street.
We came up with a plan to where we would assign certain detectives, certain streets, looking and trying to see any video evidence that we could collect.
And this is 2012, not 2023.
But there could be homes on the block where surveillance systems were in place.
And in 2012, we didn't have all the city cameras.
We didn't have the license plate readers coming in and going out of the city.
None of that technology was around back then.
It wasn't like all these houses had video surveillance systems set up.
Now it's commonplace to have your neighbor if you don't have it yourself.
Have a ring doorbell or spotlight monitors around their home.
Back then, you had to ask if, and you were lucky if someone had one.
We might get a video on one street.
The next street, there's no video.
The next street, there might be two videos.
We kind of struck out on the whole gathering video evidence to look at and try and see if we see somebody running or somebody that fits this description.
But then, at a home not far from the scene of the murder, a resident found something lying in their driveway.
That took this investigation on its first turn.
There was a resident a few blocks south that came up to us and said hey, I found this driver's license.
Obviously, we took that.
We started running with that.
The driver's license was for a male out of Arkansas.
Just think about that.
It's not like you have just a description or you get a partial plate if you see someone driving away in their car.
I mean, here you had a photograph of who may very well be your suspect slash attacker, which has their name, their address, basically exactly someplace where you just might be able to find them.
So I was thinking you know, was this a deadly sloppy mistake by the killer or just an incredible coincidence?
Investigators would need to find out.
The woman on the bike are now homicide victim while she was carrying a backpack.
So at least it was easy for investigators to identify her.
And her name was Amaria Grant.
Amaria was a 41-year-old woman from Jamaica who had worked as a live-in nanny for the Farino family for seven years.
Their house to the murder scene was maybe three, three or four blocks.
And that family, the Farino family, had become Amaria's family, because she not only worked with them, she cared for their children, she lived in their home, and that familial bond grew tight and strong over the years.
And it was evidenced by how devastated the Farinos clearly were from the moment they were notified there at the scene.
I spoke to them that day.
They were so distraught where you're trying to explain something but you can't because you're crying, and just so upset where you're kind of like stuttering talking to actually be there and to see her laying there on the sidewalk deceased.
There were so many emotions at the scene at that time.
As in every homicide investigation, interviews begin with the people closest to the victim.
And in this case the Farino family would be questioned, and a lot of that would be centered around who the nanny may have been in contact with any relationships, former husbands, boyfriends that may have been looking to hurt her.
But investigators basically came back with nothing.
And it wasn't because the Farinos weren't able to give information.
Of course, they had plenty about Amaria.
But it didn't give the investigators anyone that may have been looking to hurt her.
You know, they told us about the church going.
She would ride her bike listening to music.
She wouldn't wear headphones when she went bike riding, listening to music.
She would just usually have her phone out, whether it be in the basket or in her pocket, just kind of playing the music over the speaker as she would ride.
She never had mentioned to the family about a boyfriend.
This homicide happened at 1 p.m.
Police wasted no time in getting that information out to every media outlet they could think of, including the evening news.
And bingo witnesses came forward almost immediately.
Next day we did receive a tip of a male wearing a mid-thigh leather jacket.
He was at the 7-eleven which was a few blocks away from the murder scene.
I went, interviewed that caller.
He described blackmail, wearing a mid-thigh leather jacket.
He said he threw away a hot dog container in a waste disposal basket in the park right out in front of his building.
So we went, we photographed it, reviewed the cctv, the video surveillance.
At the 7-eleven about an hour after the murder there is a black male with a black leather jacket and shorts.
If this turns out to be the shooter, just think about it for a moment.
How callous it would be to commit a murder like that and then head over to your local store for a hot dog.
Just process that for a moment.
But this guy was bald And at least on his face.
This really doesn't click because the guy with the hot dog he was described as bald.
But remember, the witnesses that called into 911 said that the man who shot Amaria was wearing a stocking cap and it looked kind of fluffy as if he had hair.
So the two aren't really computing or was it just the callers were mistaken in what they saw?
He was having a hard time trying to remember details right there, even when he's calling 911.
And this is actually happening.
The guy was, like, younger.
He had a brown, like, leather jacket.
Kind of like a black, like, maybe a... Hold on.
Stay with me.
I'm going to get the call in.
Ma'am, I am freaked out.
Hold on a minute.
I've never...
We kind of had to look for a general, may not be a brown leather jacket, it could be a black one.
Maybe it's not a stocking cap.
Maybe it's just a short little puffy afro.
We didn't rule anything out at that time.
Investigators were able to locate the man seen at the 7-Eleven.
He was deemed the hot dog guy.
And as it turns out, the clothing description did not match, nor did anything else.
And he was quickly ruled out.
Now remember, police did have the Arkansas license that the local resident found.
We started doing background on him and found out we had just arrested him for going door to door trying to sell magazines without a license.
But when they finally located him one day after the homicide, they realized not only did he not match the description, but he had a very good alibi for the day of the crime.
And eventually he was ruled out as a suspect in this case.
Although they were looking at multiple avenues, the police weren't getting very far.
The witnesses they had were iffy.
Video surveillance, eh, you could almost hear the buzzer going off.
Hot dog guy from the store.
Eh again, no love interest, no obvious grudges, no forensics, no fingerprints, DNA nada.
They are striking out again and again.
And it's sad to say, but we had almost zero evidence.
Our kind of worst fears came to mind, well, maybe this is just random.
The lack of leads started to take on a whole new meaning.
Was this a killer in wait, getting ready to strike again?
The public was on edge.
And the question for investigators, was this just a random crime?
And I could tell you those are the most difficult cases to solve.
You know, look, I'm sure this feeds into our biases and our backgrounds, but what normally see.
But when I first heard about this I was like, oh OK, maybe she had an issue with a former love interest, because unfortunately we know how often these cases end up in a domestic violence type scenario or a issue with someone that she had worked with, or something.
But then to hear that this may very likely be random I mean that could be anyone's street anywhere
And I don't care if you're in West Palm or Wichita.
The community must have been absolutely on edge at the idea of this being a random attack.
At that point we said well, we need to get the witness with a detective from the Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office who's a forensic sketch artist.
A decision was made to generate a composite sketch, hoping that someone may recognize it.
Remember, we did have several eyewitnesses, so this could be the best opportunity.
Now, I'm taking a look at the sketch right now, and it is a side profile of the suspect.
He's wearing a dark knit cap, he's got a scruffy beard and it's a side profile which doesn't give you a great sense of his eyes, which I normally look for in a sketch.
But investigators had hoped that by putting it out, it could generate the leads they needed, the break they needed.
You know Scott, when looking at it, I actually think this is one of the better ones that I have seen of a profile.
I mean, you can even see the curvature of the nose, the pointedness of a chin.
And again, it's just a sketch at this point.
We don't know if this is going to be accurate or completely far off.
But they certainly got a lot of detail from whoever was giving them the information.
Yeah, I think the scruffy beard really helps me.
It's so detailed.
Just the way that the artist drew it.
If I stopped the person who resembled this sketch, I'd feel pretty confident about it.
And now, actually, you actually had a visual.
We wanted this picture to be out there, too, to see if it would generate more tips.
So we held a news conference.
We blew up the picture to be a poster size.
We had a reward, $10,000.
And then we made flyers.
We sent detectives to every street, to every house, to every business.
And we asked the media to come with us.
As we've seen before in multiple cases we've covered before.
I'm thinking right now of the one of you might remember John Doe Duffelbag.
It's usually a completely separate incident that sometimes leads to the arrest of the killer.
But rather than looking forward at when he might strike again, detectives are looking backwards.
Maybe he has already done something like this before.
We started going through all the police reports in that area for the past six months.
We started looking at patterns and started pulling all the field interviews that the officers had done that fits that description and tried to see if there was something we could find to try and narrow down who the suspect could be.
And while they're pursuing that angle, the Farino family waged a relentless campaign to get information on Amaria's killer.
And then, six weeks later, West Palm Beach's worst fears came true.
February 1st, 2013, we had a call of a shooting around 2.15 in the afternoon.
So this new call is about six miles away from where Amaria was murdered.
Amaria's shooting happened in a highly dense residential area.
This shooting happened on a very busy commercial street.
We all respond to the scene.
They said it was a male riding a bicycle.
He was riding in the southbound along the sidewalk in the lane of traffic.
He almost gets hit by a cab.
The cab driver pulls up alongside of him, shoots him several times.
The victim was Jonathan Overstreet, a father of four children.
And while Detective Sergeant Hardiman was overseeing the Amaria homicide, a different investigator, Detective Patterson, took the lead on the Overstreet case.
It was that eerie, familiar call.
What?
Another person on a bicycle was just shot?
So it was kind of, let's get out there quick and see if we can catch this guy.
So you have a city that's already on edge from Amaria's shooting, and then you have the connection between two victims shot when they were on a bicycle.
Now it may not be connected at all, but just think about what happens in a community like that when the news spreads that another victim is shot on a bike.
But at least on its face, the similarities seem to stop there.
Amaury's gunmen ran up to her and just fired.
With Jonathan Overstreet.
First there was a cab that came up and now the person is shooting from inside that car.
So I don't know.
This is an area, remember, it's Florida.
People ride bicycles because the weather is warm, much more than they might be doing in Chicago in the middle of the winter.
So I don't know that just on its face that they're on bicycles is going to necessarily connect them, or at least not yet.
I think the important thing here is to assume it's connected, but investigate it like it could be.
Either or.
The difference here is Overstreet survived the shooting, but he was left paralyzed.
At that point one detective goes and tries to speak with Mr Overstreet, while the rest of us start to canvas the area and start getting video.
Now, what's interesting is what Overstreet told police.
He said that he's riding along on his bicycle and then he almost gets hit by a cab.
So instinctively, he starts to yell at the cab.
And then the cab comes back, pulls alongside of him and shoots him.
So just on its face it almost sounds like a road rage type incident because, although we know there were some words used reportedly between Maria and her attacker,
You can almost just see that person walking up to her and maybe her seeing the gun coming out and yelling or saying something about that when he shoots her.
Where here there at least seemed to be something that precipitated the shooting.
He was able to talk and provide us a brief statement of he almost got hit by a cab.
He yelled at the driver of the cab, and the cab driver then pulled alongside him and shot several times.
And it was the driver of the cab.
And I believe it was Mr Overstreet was able to give us a suspect's description of a male, 30 to 40 with a small Afro-style haircut.
And there's also one thing that just doesn't line up about these two cases being connected.
At the moment, Aumaria's homicide had multiple witnesses.
We heard from them, but not a single one of them mentioned anything about a cab.
So why would the killer be on foot to shoot Aumaria when he was capable of just driving up, like he did with Jonathan?
Is the killer getting smarter?
Because if this is just random, there's something deeper going on, likely with the psyche of the person committing this crime.
And are they honing their skills or perfecting the way that they commit this crime?
And just think about for a moment the fear element of what must be now going on.
Yeah, just think about the next time you called a cab, could this be the shooter?
The description is extremely specific, but it doesn't give the name of the cab company, nor does it get a license plate.
So, as helpful as a description of a cab is, they still have to go through the process of eliminating every potential cab that could have been in the area at the time of the shooting.
This was a very unique looking cab.
When you talk to somebody and you mention a cab, they think of like the Crown Vic style cab you know, like in New York City that you see on TV.
This was a special type of cab.
It was a hybrid of an SUV and a van.
And this was the first time that I'd ever seen one of these was working this case.
It was more geared to carry, say, medical patients that are in a wheelchair.
It wasn't for your normal, you wave down a cab.
You get inside and they drive you somewhere.
This was a cab we find out later you made appointments for.
Like there was a schedule for this type of cab for doctor's appointments and stuff like that.
So now police are looking at the area.
This attack happened on a very busy street and there are businesses.
So sure enough, they get some cameras.
So as we're watching the video, we can see everything play out.
You can see the cab come up.
You see him come falling off the bicycle, and then the cab flees the area.
The phone number of the cab was written on the side, so we had that through the video.
We had the cab name.
Detectives went to the owner of the cab and we come to find out that this particular cab that is in this video, there's 59 of them operating in Palm Beach County.
Now 59 may sound like a lot, but it's a whole lot better, let's say, than New York City, where there's just under 14000 yellow cabs.
Either way, it's 59 potential leads which all need to be investigated.
We asked the business.
Can you give us a list of names that people who are driving these cabs are employees?
And they supply us with 25 names of employees.
So we start to look through the names.
We send out a be on the lookout to all the other agencies about this particular cab.
And we come up with nothing that night.
And of course you're all probably thinking it's also possible that the shooter is not among the 25 cab drivers who were provided to investigators.
So is it someone that's now borrowing someone else's cab potentially, or even stealing it to commit the crime?
You know, the possibilities, you really, your head can start to spin.
Yeah, which makes it even more important to find those 25, interview them and get a determination of were they working.
Were they responding to cab requests in that area?
And then, three days later, the shooter strikes again.
Or at least it seemed.
The cab company owner saying hey, one of my drivers just showed up with a bullet hole in the cab and he said he was shot at.
While they were completing a fare, a black pickup truck pulled up alongside and shot into his cab.
So this is the first we're hearing about a black pickup truck.
Perhaps it's completely unrelated to Ambria's case.
It's still somehow connected to a cab and it's still something that Dennis Hardiman really needed to focus on.
The victim in this case was 31-year-old cab driver Rupert Hardy, but he was not struck by gunfire.
We ended up sending detectives out there to try and look at this cab and see who the driver was and to see what the detective would see when they looked at this bullet hole inside this cab.
Crime scene technicians would go through the cab to see if they could extract a projectile, a piece of forensic evidence that could tie all of these cases together.
And as crime scene technicians are processing the exterior and interior of Rupert's cab, they find something very interesting.
It was true that the cab did suffer damage from a bullet, but there's more.
So I was still at the police department.
Another detective called me back and said hey, looking at this cab, you can see in the passenger side door there's a dimple on the outside of the car.
The bullet hole is actually on the inside of the car, of the window frame.
The trajectory of this round is from inside, not from outside in.
And just picture that for a moment.
You're standing outside of a car and you see a dimple out towards the vehicle.
So then you determine that that shot had to have been from the inside.
You know, Scott, I hear you're a boy.
It is nothing that they would have expected, at least when they started to investigate this latest shooting case.
Absolutely.
This guy has, as I would say, some explaining to do.
And on top of that, the driver, Rupert Hardy, was a name that police were already familiar with.
The cab driver's name is Rupert Hardy, and that was one of the 25 names that was given to us on February 1st 2013, when Mr Overstreet was shot.
It's connecting the dots in a really solid way.
Getting Rupert Hardy in a room to talk would be the obvious next step.
Was he working that night?
Was he in the area?
Does he own a firearm?
Sergeant Dennis Hardiman was convinced they were finally getting somewhere.
I'm going to be able to call this family and tell them I found out who killed Miss Grant.
Now I just had to start putting all the pieces together of the puzzle to actually make that happen for the Farino family.
What type of a coincidence would it be that he is one of the 25 drivers of the cab company that we know that was involved at least in the Jonathan Overstreet shooting?
So really, it comes down to the where, what, when and why.
The driver shooting.
Mr Overstreet, if he's shooting out the passenger window, he shoots his own window one time.
So we asked Mr Hardy if he would come back and speak to investigators at the police department, and he agreed to come back with the detective.
Many people out there often say like why on earth would anyone ever agree to go down to the police station and speak to them, especially if they're actually involved in these cases?
But, you know, from doing this for decades at this point, we can certainly tell you, yes, they do.
And whether it's because that person again, if this person is actually involved in the crime, so they are indeed responsible for.
Well, maybe they think they can talk their way out of it.
Maybe they think they are smarter.
Maybe they just want to know what type of information the police have.
And they look at this almost as a fact-finding mission that maybe they want their chance to put their spin on it, if they have to say anything at all.
For the various reasons that people choose to speak to police, this isn't an uncommon scenario, even if he is the one responsible for it all.
As an investigator, sitting down with somebody that you're trying to gain information.
It is a situation where you provide the information that you need to gain information.
You ask questions that you know the answers to.
So if someone is not being honest, whether you hear them give that answer or whether you see a physical reaction from them, that's what takes these investigations forward.
And finding out that the round was shot from inside the cab out is a significant enough lead to question him about it.
Now, it completely goes against the statement he already gave.
So as I said before, he has some explaining to do.
Now, remember, Rupert doesn't know what investigators know.
He is unaware that they found that projectile going from inside the car to outside the car.
So they're going to bring him in and they're going to talk to him.
And if he's willing to talk, they're going to keep it very conversational until it needs to take that turn.
Until it needs to be explained to him, well, that story really doesn't add up.
I was there, myself and the detective who took the lead on Mr. Overstreet's case.
You know, because we both kind of had an interest in this case, just for the mere fact that it was on a bicycle.
So we kind of said the other detective that was working this was also a homicide detective.
We said, let's just work it together.
So we both decided to go in and interview Mr. Hardy together.
So now it comes time for their strategy of how they're going to approach this guy.
And so their tact is, remember, he tells his employer that he was shot at.
So they're going to run with that, at least as they sit with him in that interview room.
You're here as a victim, a survivor, can tell us everything that you can.
And again, every bit of information he says, whether truthful or not, is helpful.
He comes into the police department.
We place him in an interview room in the criminal investigations division.
Everything was audio, video recorded.
We told him we appreciate you coming down.
We wanted to get some more information about somebody shooting at you.
So we kind of led into, okay, where were you when you were shot at?
We let him give his account, big black pickup truck, somebody shot at him.
Rupert was going down a path of talking about that black truck.
Black truck, black truck.
It's involved.
But there was no evidence of any black truck in that area on that day.
Sergeant Hardeman wanted to dig further into Rupert's facts of the actual shooting without letting him know that science is telling them differently.
So then we said, hey, were you working on February 1st?
He said, yeah, I was.
We asked if he was in the city of West Palm Beach and he said I almost hit a bicyclist on Broadway Avenue.
It's almost as if like, uh-oh, maybe they saw something on video.
So I'm going to give an innocent explanation.
And then if I have to later say, but I didn't shoot him.
Yes, that was me.
But that bullet, you know, came out of thin air.
Maybe it was the same person who now shot at him and then later thought that I was a witness and then shot at me.
You can almost see the mind starting to work and race to try to get out from under the facts that the police are slowly starting to put before him.
My feeling was...
This guy knows that we know that he shot Mr. Overstreet.
He may know that we think he shot Ms.
Grant, but we're not positive.
So what also this initial part of the interview is doing?
It is serving to build rapport, get him comfortable in the room.
And again, what he's saying, it isn't making a whole lot of sense, but who cares?
You can use that later.
And that's where you also see the conversation start to shift.
We said, okay, did you shoot that guy?
Remember, there's no rush to ask the question, did you do it?
There really isn't a rush.
Obviously in hindsight, when you look back at all these cases, there's a few things you would have done differently.
And there are a couple things in this case where I would have done things differently.
In fact, the more information, the more you get your subject to talk, the better for the investigation.
There is definite time to ask that all-important, did you do it question.
He denied any involvement in the shooting.
We had him here for maybe about an hour or so talking with him, ask him a few more questions and then come back to him shooting Mr Overstreet.
But ultimately he denied any involvement and he stuck to his story that a black pickup truck shot at him.
And here the interview really takes a different turn.
So Detective Patterson's talking to him a little bit more in the interview room and I leave and I'm standing at my desk and Mr Hardy comes out of the interview room.
And what Dennis sees next, he describes in a way that must have shocked him to his core.
And it's at that point, as I'm standing at my desk, I get the profile view of Mr. Hardy.
So I see him from the side.
And at my desk, I still had from Ms.
Grant's homicide, the three foot by four foot poster.
And the sketch was a profile sketch.
I looked at him.
I looked at the sketch.
And I kind of got that punch in the gut, like that's the guy.
And we're letting him walk out the door.
On the next Anatomy of Murder.
We're trying to find out what happened.
This guy is going to flee the country or he is going to go somewhere.
We're never going to find him.
We need you to tell us the truth.
We know there's more to it that happened.
We know that you were there.
Tune in next week for part two of this story.
Anatomy of Murder is an AudioChuck original.
Produced and created by Weinberger Media and Fresetti Media.
Ashley Flowers and Sumit David are executive producers.
So, what do you think, Chuck?
Do you approve?
