All right, Sean, there is a documentary that Ari and I were texting about.
Did you see it? It was called Martha.
It was on Netflix. It was about Martha Stewart.
I haven't seen it. I actually don't know really anything about her.
Great. This is so great because Martha Stewart was a beast.
I really couldn't tell you five things about Martha Stewart.
So like, was she kind of the first influencer, like the celebrity influencer who then started launching products?
What's the story? Martha Stewart was a killer.
She was a total shark.
She was way sharkier.
If you only know her as her put together image of like this, like housewife who cooks, everything I'm going to say is going to blow your mind because she was a total shark.
So I'm going to give you a little bit of her background.
So basically, she's born and raised up in the East Coast.
She goes to Columbia University.
While she's going to school, she becomes a model because she was a cute woman when she was young.
Wow. She was fantastic.
Yeah. Very pretty woman.
Yeah. Go Martha. She gets married at a young age, like 19 or 20 years old, but graduates Columbia and her father -in -law helps her get a job as a stockbroker.
By the way, she studied architectural history or something like that at Columbia.
Nothing to do with stocks and so at the age of like 24 -25, she gets this job.
And you're probably wondering, how on earth did Martha Stewart become a stockbroker?
Well, I am wondering.
When her father -in -law first met her, he was like, you have this like it factor.
You are so charming.
You are so put together because she had this vibe at a very young age in her 20s.
She dressed fantastically.
She was very charismatic.
She was clearly driven and hardworking.
And this small like 10 person operation that was a stockbrokerage, they needed a saleswoman, a salesperson.
And it was all men at the time.
I think this was in the 60s.
It was all dudes. It was a very male dominated industry.
But she comes into this interview and eventually works there.
And they comment on how her she's dressed like perfectly, like so perfectly that you're sort of intimidated when you first meet her because she's like perfectly put together.
But then she's like really charming and warm.
And you're like, Oh, I like you.
And so she starts like as a salesperson, basically at the stock company, basically working at with clients and getting them to like trust them and things like that.
And she kills it. And so listen to this, at the age of 26, according to this documentary, she said she was making $135 ,000 a year, which equivalent today is a million dollars a year at the age of 26 as a stockbroker.
Pretty crazy that she went from being a model to a stockbroker in that short amount of time.
And she kills it. And she does it for like six or seven years.
Like it's like a legitimate career for her.
And she suggests that one of our clients buy this stock that was like a dollar.
And it went to like 10 bucks.
So it killed it. Then they bought a little bit more.
And it goes something huge like to 50.
It was like this massive stock.
And it made these clients all this money.
But then the $50 stock goes right back down to like eight or 10 bucks.
And so technically, her client had still made a bunch of money.
But that roller coaster ride of like making a little bit of money that making a ton of money than losing a ton of money.
It like left her kind of distraught.
And so she bailed because of that like journey.
And so she quit. And so in the when she's like 30 years old or late 20s, she moves out to actually where I'm living now Westport, Connecticut.
She was like, you know, I want to have a kid.
I want to like try this housewife life, whatever and do this thing.
And she moves out here.
And she sits around for a very short amount of time.
And she's like, Alright, I got to do something like I can't just sit here.
And so they buy this like kind of shitty house.
And she like totally turns around and redoes the whole thing all by herself.
She paints it, she builds this beautiful garden, she learns how to raise goats, and chickens, and like, plant her own garden and like, creates this amazing like estate out in Westport, Connecticut, which now it's fancy.
Back then, it wasn't particularly fancy.
And so, eventually, she gets really into this.
And she's like, you know, I kind of like housewife life.
What if I start hosting some dinner parties?
And she creates these lavish, amazing dinner parties.
And eventually, all these rich guys who come are like, hey, do you want to like cater my party?
And so that's what she starts doing.
And so she builds a business as a caterer that she said made her a millionaire.
All right, let's take a quick break to talk about our sponsor today HubSpot.
With smaller budgets and sky expectations growth is feeling pretty painful right now.
But HubSpot just announced more than 200 product updates to make impossible growth feel impossibly easy.
Like Breeze, it's a new suite of AI tools that will help you say goodbye to your busy work and hello to better work.
Breeze intelligence which will give you the richest, most comprehensive picture of your prospects and customers.
And reimagine marketing and content hubs to attract and convert more leads and send your revenue soaring.
Visit hubspot .com slash spotlight to learn more.
And her whole shtick back then for this catering business, well, she goes, I'm going to make everything by scratch.
And so Westport, Connecticut, we're about an hour and 10 minutes from New York City.
At this time, people start realizing that she could actually operate on like three or four hours of sleep.
And so she would go to like catering, the catering business, by the way, it's like, that's like the hardest thing on earth, right?
It's brutal. It's a really hard business to pull off.
And so she was famous for going to the farmers markets in New York at 4am getting all of her produce and then going in the morning and baking all of her food.
And so her famous saying as her catering business was basically I make everything from scratch.
And not only does he just make stuff from scratch.
One time she saw this brochure that like was doing a recreation of like the pilgrims Thanksgiving.
And there was like a basket of fruit that was like overflowing.
And she was like, that's what I'm going to do.
And so she was famous for creating these like charcuterie boards of like overflowing meats and fruits.
And she says something that was actually really inspiring.
She was like, I wanted to turn this into experience.
And like I wanted to make this like fruitboard.
She was like, it sounds trivial, but that was my art.
And I was going to make like these baskets of fruit overflow with strawberries to show that this table is where like generosity like like, you know, like an abundance and all this stuff.
And it's a massive hit.
She builds us into a big business to the point where a few years in, she goes and she caters a I think it was like penguin publishing or something like that.
Like one of these publishers party she caters it and it's a really big deal.
You know, she's doing like the Met, all these museum and art museums in New York.
And this is a big deal that she's doing this catering company, or this publishing company.
And they start talking to her and they're like, dude, you are amazing.
Do you want to write a cookbook for us?
And so she does. And it takes her like a few years like three or four years because she's super hands on on writing this book.
And they were like, hey, so what you do is cookbook just put in a bunch of recipes, it's a black and white photos.
And she was a nobody and she goes not a chance.
We're doing colored photos.
And we're actually going to do like 500 photos.
And I just give me the budget, I'll go ahead and I'm going to like hire a photographer friend.
And we're going to go and like organize all these photos and take all these lavish photos at my house that I made.
Because we're going to make this like the Martha Stewart cookbook, where at the time, typically it had just been recipes, she was like, No, we're going to add in about like my lifestyle, we're going to have these photos, one of the photos and this is like her kitchen.
Look how lavish that is like, what do you see?
The most full kitchen I've ever seen.
There's literally 9000 pots and pans hanging above her and then she's surrounded she's like, her kitchen looks like a charcuterie board.
It looks like an overflowing charcuterie board, but she's one of she's like a piece of salami in the middle.
And that's like the whole her whole shtick.
Basically, she she says this, she's like, I'm gonna sell perfection, because she was she was a perfectionist, she was actually a pain in the ass to work for.
And the first book was called entertaining.
And it was about like entertaining guests, basically.
Yeah, and like creating an atmosphere of like warmth and things like that.
And it was a massive hit.
It sold 650 ,000 copies.
What do you think? I feel like Nick Gray is the new Martha Stewart.
I'm just gonna put that out there.
What Nick Gray is doing with the two hour cocktail party.
I think he's just a, he's just a young Martha Stewart right now.
Yeah, well, and she was like, one of the early influencers because this was in the 80s.
This is when like mass media is really becoming a thing.
And it's a massive hit.
And so like these women buy these books, because it's not just about cooking, it's about like being better being aspirational, like perfecting a craft, and she sold the shit out of this lifestyle.
And it was her lifestyle.
And she basically said in the documentary, she was like, I had visions early on of creating this Martha Stewart media company all about me, because I'm great.
Like I am what she's like, she was very confident about that.
Opening up the business plan like, alright, Martha Stewart's media company, it's about me next page, because I'm great.
Next page. But she was I mean, she was so like, there's a lot of bad stuff that has gone on.
Like basically, her husband cheats on her, she cheats on her husband.
Her daughter's like, dude, she was a cold mom.
People complain working for her.
They're like, dude, she's just a fucking asshole.
And she was like, throughout the documentary, they get her on camera being rude to her employees.
And so yeah, she's like a perfectionist.
And she, she was like, I'm not I'm not sorry for that.
I'm a perfectionist.
Wait, so fast forward through the business side.
So she does the cookbook, cookbook's a hit.
Massive hit. And eventually, one thing leads to another where Kmart which was just like Kmart today back then it was like, you know, lower, lower status store.
She partners with them to create like a line of betting.
And people are like shocked.
They're like, why would this upscale woman do this?
And it turned out to be a great move.
It was really cool.
And then she partners with time and she creates a series of magazines.
And she's the editor of the magazine.
It goes really well.
But she's like, I want to own this son of a bitch.
And so she raises $85 million.
And she buys the magazine.
And three or four years later takes it public.
And I show the financials of her business.
It was basically I think it was called Martha Stewart Omni media, basically the she buys the business of like something like three years later takes it public.
The in year three, it's doing $130 million a year in 1997, $130 million in revenue.
And it's a behemoth of a business.
So basically they've got the TV show, they have tons and tons of magazines.
They have merchandising like the Kmart deal, it just crushes it.
And it goes public and she becomes the first ever self made women's billionaire in America, and just annihilates it, but then something really bad happens.
So basically, she's worth like 400 500 600 million at this point, because the stock was going up and down.
Apparently, she calls her stockbroker, she's like, Hey, I want you to sell this one stock.
So she sells this one stock, and she made like 30 grand off of it.
Turns out a lot of people think that it was insider trading.
And so the DOJ like interviews her and figures out this whole thing and does this massive investigation.
Turns out the charges of insider trading are dropped.
They're like you did not insider trade.
However, so sorry, she sold her own stock or she sold just a different just a stock, and only 30k.
So why was it a big deal?
Anyway, it was so it was a big deal.
Because we're just we're we're basically there was like Enron and a bunch of things like this were happening at the time and the DOJ was like, any insider trading, any like corruption, we're gonna go we're going like really hard against all of us.
And so she sells some stock.
It's suspicious turns out that this the CEO of this of the company whose stock she sold, he was in fact corrupt.
And they're like, but you knew him what's going on, you knew that this drug wasn't going to pass.
You sold the stock, whatever.
The DOJ investigates her.
And they're like, you actually, that looks clean.
It looks like you didn't know anything.
However, when we interviewed you, you told us some small fact about how you were on a schedule to sell this stock turns out you weren't on a schedule.
And so you lied to us.
And so we are going to put you in federal penitentiary for five months for lying not for insider trading.
But for lying about this, like somewhat not that big of a deal fact.
And so kind of bullshit kind of not like she did lie, but like she got five months in the federal penitentiary and she's like 50 years old.
And at the time when all this trial shit happens, that's when we realized that Martha Stewart, she's, she's kind of bad.
She's bad. Because there's all these stories where the it comes out.
She's a little rude.
And so for example, her stockbroker has this assistant who would talk to Martha mostly.
And like there's examples of like, of the stockbrokers assistant being like, dude, she was the meanest person ever.
For example, one time she called and I had to put her on hold.
And I go back to talk to her.
She goes, Hey, if you don't change that waiting music, that tacky waiting music, by the next time I call, I'm going to have you fired.
And just hung up, just like hung up.
Like there's like repeatedly, like a bunch of stories where she just did, she was not like very kind to people.
And that kind of swayed public opinion of her.
She goes to jail for five months.
And it sucked, it sucked for her.
It was not good. She gets out of jail.
And she ends up doing Justin Bieber's roast, which again, changed public perception of her because at this point, everyone was like, man, it's kind of fun seeing Martha Stewart kind of downfall because she was perfect woman, like, f her it's kind of nice.
Like it brings brings me up to see this.
I knew she wasn't so perfect.
Yeah. But she roasts Justin Bieber.
And she's just like hilarious.
She talks about how she like shanked bitches in prison.
And how she like made this shank with just like a piece of pencil and some bubble gum and you could do one too at home.
I'll show you how, like it like kind of humanized her was pretty cool.
But her getting arrested, it decimated the stock.
So she was like on the documentary, she was like, I think I would have been worth $10 billion.
But when I got arrested, my stock went way down, we ended up selling the company for like $300 million.
And it was kind of like the, it could have been like a great company, but it kind of wasn't.
However, throughout this whole thing, this whole documentary, Martha like has shown time and time again, she's a bad, bad woman, like in all sense of the word as in like, she's brutal, she's smart, she's conniving.
Her stock is only going up in your books.
That's all I'm hearing.
All I'm hearing is like, let's just summarize.
Good looking lady already off to a good start.
Then goes from model to sales slash stockbroker.
All right. Amazing.
One interesting thing.
That's cool. Two interesting things you have my attention.
Third interesting thing, self made first kind of major tradwife influencer, does the cookbooks, does it her way is ruthless with the details is has has a no nonsense attitude.
She's a stickler. These are all I mean, these are your safe words, dude, like these are all the things that you enjoy.
So this is really up your alley.
Like I mean, like, how do you feel about Martha Stewart right now?
Because it sounds like even when she's bad, it just made her more good in your books.
Sorta. I mean, she paid the price.
So basically, like her husband left her her kids that she's got a bad relationship with her children because of the way she behaved.
And she basically she's 83.
Now, by the way, I didn't realize how old she was.
And like she hasn't had a relationship since her husband and her broke up.
So she paid the price.
She there's a cost to be the boss, you know, and she paid it but she is in fact the boss.
So I do have a lot of respect for her.
And I also think that there's downsides to achieve what she achieved.
But I'm shocked you didn't know that.
Did you know any of this?
Like how she's like not really?
I knew she had like a cookbook or was on TV.
And that she sold like stuff to women.
That's kind of the extent of what I knew about Martha Stewart, dude, she's great.
And so another big takeaway and I'll wrap up here is how big of a company you could start in and have just off the back of one person.
Like it was the Martha Stewart brand and she was like into that like a lot of people would be fearful of like having that burden having that on their back of like literally 1000 plus employees and billions of dollars of value and she was totally into it and she loved it.
And I love those types of personalities.
Right, but it sounds like this company wasn't that good.
And your numbers table here, you know, by 2001, it says total revenue 295 million net income 21 million, which is obviously that's good.
That's not nothing.
But that's not a 10 billion dollar company to make, you know, 21 million a year of net income.
And then it says from 2003 to 2015, which is like three presidents, it says consecutive annual losses every year, except for one year.
So was this really a good business or was this actually just a lot of work for nothing?
No, it was good. I mean, you have to think of a few things.
One, you know, it was making 300 million dollars a year in revenue and a lot of it came from publishing and publishing means subscription magazines.
So like that's like pretty good.
But then the internet came and just completely like obliterated that industry.
I mean, that was like magazines are probably like the worst industry to be in.
So like, yeah, there's a lot of what ifs and the timing was such that she got arrested and also like, you know, Amazon was created and the internet was created.
So yeah, there's a lot of like what ifs but I feel like if she was, I think she was like 30 years too early, like I think if she had the internet, she could have become a juggernaut because it sounds like her talent and her ruthlessness.
That combination was going to serve her well.
And it just she needed she needed a better medium.
If she could have just owned her own Instagram and TikTok channels and built everything off the back of that.
I mean, I think she would have been the number one sort of like women's or mom influencer.
She arguably was that anyways of her era, but the market 100 X.
Yeah, yeah, I mean, and like, I think a lot of these like big celebrities, I think it was a little bit easier to be a big celebrity in the 80s 90s and early 2000s, because there was less of them.
Now, anyone with a cell phone can become a celebrity in like six or 12 months.
So it's hard to say but but by the way, her businesses, her businesses still do like a billion a year in sales.
Okay, gotcha. You have something in your notes here.
Typical day of 60 year old Martha Stewart.
Yeah, read that. It says she's 60 but she looks a decade younger.
She's she's been up since 4 30am.
She answers her email at five takes a three mile walk with her trainer at six.
She tours her garden at seven as when she tours her garden she's thrilled to discover a duck and 13 ducklings in the swimming pool by 730.
She's whipping up corn gruel for a visiting waterfowl.
I don't even know what any of these words are an animal and building a wooden ramp to help them get in and out of the pool.
A duck. Okay, she's doing all this stuff for a duck TV crew arrives at eight hair and makeup a 30.
And then she's shooting her TV segment by 9am.
Yeah, dude, it's crazy.
I woke up like 19 minutes ago.
And I rolled out of bed I put on this hat and then I started a click play.
I don't think I don't think I'm built for this.
She's a machine. You know how like people say stories of like how Trump can only operate on three hours of sleep.
That's a real thing.
By the way, there's like a it's like I forget what the name of it is like a thing.
She's another person that she's famous for only sleeping like three hours a night.
All right, my friends, I have a new podcast for you guys to check out it's called content is profit and it's hosted by Luis and Fonzie Kameo.
And it's brought to you by the HubSpot podcast network.
After years of building content teams and frameworks for companies like Red Bull and Orange Theory Fitness, Luis and Fonzie are on a mission to bridge the gap between content and revenue.
In each episode, you're going to hear from top entrepreneurs and creators, and you're going to hear them share their secrets and strategies to turn their content into profit.
You can check out a recent episode called the secret to content that converts and they break down our buddy Alex Hermosi blueprint for effective video production.
So you can check out content is profit wherever you get your podcast.
Perfect segue. Can I tell you what my best topic was that I wanted to talk to you about?
Osempic for sleep. So there's a guy, his blog is Isaac .net.
And he wrote this post about sleeplessness.
And he basically says that there's a set of people that are famous who have the short sleeper jeans, a set of jeans for where, you know, about four to five hours a night is a full night's rest for them.
And he says that, you know, Mozart, Thomas Edison, Sigmund Freud, Margaret Thatcher, Obama, and he's like, even my lab, lab mate, this guy's a researcher, he's like, have this thing called short sleeper syndrome.
And people thought that short sleeper syndrome would be, you sleep less.
And maybe you're able to operate that way.
But you know, it's got to be bad for you.
Sleep we know is sort of the best thing for you, it restores the brain and the body and all your function.
And so these people must be dying younger and have more disease, right?
And it's like, no, actually, they don't.
These people just simply have the benefit without the cost.
They sleep, you know, they need about three hours less sleep than the rest of us.
But they don't pay the price in terms of, you know, the health consequences of that.
And so he goes on this post and he basically outlines that we who these people, by the way, in this photo.
So he says, you know, my favorite family is this family called the Johnsons from Utah.
And the Johnsons from Utah are a set of researchers.
And I think a bunch of them have this short sleeper genetic makeup.
And so they've been researching this for a while.
And it's about, you know, 1 % of people have this thing, where you're, you don't need as much sleep, and it does not seem detrimental to your health or your productivity.
And they've studied why is this?
What is it? Is it not?
And they basically like, there's four kind of like, protein changes that they've noticed, like, you know, variations in the glutamate receptor, GRM one, blah, blah, blah.
So there's these four things.
And then they've done some tests in mice and others, where they do like knockouts.
So they'll, they'll knock out one of the genes and then we'll see if it, you know, makes the the mouse sleep less or sleep more.
And they can you do that to a like, when you say knockout, does that mean like, you're a living being?
Or when they reproduce a living being?
You can that's how the body works.
You could just like, I said that with so much confidence for somebody who has no idea.
But I think that you could do that.
I'm a bio major, you could check that.
That's a fact, Jack, but I don't know if you could do I don't know if this is done at the embryo or in the living thing.
But point is they've tested this in mouse models.
Mouse models don't always apply to human models.
So there's some question there.
But the the researcher sort of points out actually, you know, usually when mouse model when things that work in mice don't work in humans.
It's because they tried it and it worked for the first time in mice.
And then it takes a long time to even try it in humans.
And maybe it won't work is like in this case, we're observing it actually in humans and that we went back to mice and tried to recreate that those genetic mutations or those genetic genetic changes.
And so this is really exciting.
So what he's talking about is like, in the same way that we found drugs like Ozempic, which could modify your appetite, it could change your need for food in a way that had all these downstream health benefits, right?
You change your need for food, you reduce your need for food.
Now you eat less. obesity goes down.
They've seen that it, you know, helps with things like addiction to alcohol.
There's like all these other like things that people are noticing with these.
That's the Ozempic case.
This guy's saying you could do the same with sleep.
Like is this guy Isaac?
Is he the researcher or is he just blogging on this?
He's a researcher who is blogging about this.
Wow, got it. And he's basically saying that like potentially we could create something that does the same thing that how Ozempic reduced your need for food, that we could reduce your need for sleep and make you mirror these people who have this already, where they don't suffer the consequences of less
sleep. And he's like, you know, you do the math and you're like, if you're saving three or four hours a night of sleep, you basically it's like the world's best longevity trade.
So what most people try to do with longevity is like, Oh, if I'm living till 80, can I live till 90?
If I'm living 90, can I live till 100, 100, 110?
And they're trying to push off the like that last marginal decade of poor health, where you can't walk as much.
You can't see as well.
You know, if you're in pain, all that stuff, you're trying to push that back as far as you can.
This would make it so that you actually just live better.
Like the days where you're healthy, you have more days, you're awake for more of the time.
And it's the equivalent of an extra 10 years, but you get the 10 years not at the end, you get it sort of all along the way while you're in your best health of your life.
And that would be the promise of this.
And so how exciting is that I feel like, that it's possible that somebody's gonna make an osempic for sleep, and it's gonna allow us to instead of needing eight hours, I can sleep for five and feel just as good as I would on eight.
He says, this is like adding 10 more years to your life and 80 year lifespan, eight hours a day is asleep compared to 80 80 years with four hours of sleep.
That's 10 years. This is amazing.
And on top of that, by the way, there's people who said suffer from insomnia and narcolepsy.
And like there's all these actual like sleep apnea, there's all these things that affect people sleep.
Maybe you could alleviate those along the way, right?
Like if you know there's there's thousands of Americans who have those problems, could you also improve those?
Okay, first of all, this is amazing.
This is a great find I'm reading his blog.
His writing is really great.
It doesn't write like, this is why I was shocked that he's a researcher because he's, I think like there's like a quote where he goes, this is crazy.
Like that. Yeah, they don't they don't normally say things like that.
Yeah, they don't have personalities, usually.
This is profound implications.
By the way, he's 22 years old.
He's a PhD student at MIT, exploring brain simulations as alternative path to beneficial AI.
And in the past, he skipped out of high school in rural Austria to graduate early.
In his gap year, he created a $1 million nonprofit and ran the most viral tech conference of the had Sam Altman and others come.
He's self taught Mandarin last year and did his undergrad at Berkeley in two years.
Guy's a winner. Doing well.
And he owns Isaac .net.
He's like, great down my name.
Isaac with a K. This guy's great, man.
But what I was gonna say was is this, I've never I've, I've heard of, you know, that that gene a little bit that you're discussing.
But it's just funny that there's just some kid with a 22 year old with a personal blog.
And this is the first time that I've ever heard about this.
Is this? That's what I'm saying is fascinating.
But if he if he's just talking about his blog, is this like something that actually has, like, why is there not more press or, or press releases on this topic?
Is it actually there is now we just broke it dude.
This was the tipping point.
You're gonna see other people working on this.
You're gonna see people talking about this.
There's gonna be misinformation everywhere.
It's gonna be great.
This story is awesome.
Just because I like Isaac and also I would like to do.
I would like to not sleep.
Would you rather be skinny like a Zen pick and not eat less or be like chubby or whatever you I could sleep only five hours instead of eight.
I'm gonna give a shit I would be the fattest man on earth to do that.
But like that is that is a way better superpower to need less sleep to get back three hours of time every day.
That's debatable. I think that people will always prefer to be skinny over sleep, less sleep up.
People are dumb. That's so dumb.
If they if they prefer to be like have an extra three hours of life every day.
If the average 25 real if you're like look hot or live to 90 versus 80, they're gonna choose hot over sleep any day of the week.
Well, this is why we don't ask 25 year olds questions.
The brain is not fully formed yet.
This is a great find his blog, according to similar web, just shot up to 125 ,000 visitors in October.
What did he like before it was not published this in November.
So that's kind of cool.
So Ben found this and he sent it to our friends.
Our friend invested in a company that made a GLP one drug and like sold for billions of dollars.
And so he sent this to him, because he's like, Oh, you like you did that early Ozimpic thing before Ozimpic was like a known thing like seven years before he invested in this company that was going to work on on that.
And it paid off in a big way.
So he sent it to him.
And that guy was like, I don't know how you found this.
This is the best thing I've read all year.
Like I'm so excited about what you just sent me.
And it was such a great example of Ben being Ben where Ben has on one side, a really curated feed where he'll find interesting things like this.
Like he'll be fought.
He doesn't follow many people, but he'll be following a guy like this Isaac guy.
And then he knows who to route the information to.
And it's, he's like a, he's like FedEx.
Like he doesn't touch the package.
Like when I, when I get this, I immediately start doing research.
I write notes, I go talk about it.
I'm not passing it to somebody smarter.
Ben's like, he's like a FedEx guy.
The package comes off the conveyor belt.
He grabs the box, tosses in the truck, drives it to the address, drops it off and doesn't ask any questions about what's inside.
He just knows that's useful for you.
I think this is useful for you.
And he just does that all day.
I had him like add me to all these group chats.
Like he was always texting people, but I said, yo, just add me.
I just want to be a part of these.
So now I'm in probably like 60 group chats where it's me, Ben and a mutual like acquaintance or friend.
And he's just doing this all day.
He's just routing packets to each other, to different people about, yeah, I think you're into this kind of thing.
That's ridiculous. How is he going to monetize it?
Can he ever monetize this?
Yeah, dude. We monetize this phenomenally.
This is the secret of Ben.
He just tries to be useful.
And then he'll be like, Hey, yeah.
Um, remember that guy like you met a year ago who you then didn't talk to ever again?
I'm like, yeah, I think so.
I think I remember he was cool.
He's like, yeah, so I've been texting him, you know, we text daily.
And he's got this new thing and it's taking off.
And he wants us to invest.
He's not letting anyone else in.
And then we invest in it.
It's incredible how this karma just comes back tenfold for Ben.
And he never asks for anything.
He never asks. It's amazing.
He texts me, uh, like a fair bit, like just like, um, solve this thing.
You might like it. Like, you know, I saw the recipient of these things.
And I, I hate texting.
Like, I hate like being at my computer and like constantly having to go back and forth with 10 different people, which is how a lot of people's computers look right now where you're like, it's between Slack and messages.
You're just like going back and forth with 15 or 20 people at all times.
And you're like, what did I do all day today?
I just like shattered.
I just chit chat it.
It's so I don't like doing it.
Do you fall into that trap like throughout the day where you're like, dude, I just like texted people all day.
Yeah. I like Slack because I like my projects that I'm working on, but I don't text much.
I'm a very bad texer.
And if anyone's out there who's texting me, I really apologize.
I probably have not texted you back.
So I'm, I'm prolifically bad at it.
Ben is prolifically great at it.
And that combination has really helped.
The combination has really helped.
And now people don't digit bypass me altogether.
They go to him and it hurts my feelings sometimes.
I'm like, wait, I thought I was friends with this person, but now I understand why, because he's just a better texture.
In fact, he was like, I need to make a shirt called I reply because that's my thing, dude.
I reply and I can say it's pretty easy.
And I was like, you should write like the modern day, how to win friends and influence people, because that's what he does.
He wins friends and influences people with the most basic, the most basic of things.
And I was like, you couldn't sell like the thing you do creates like tons of value, tens of millions of dollars in value for us.
You couldn't even teach people this because you would say what you do out loud, and they'd be like, that was it.
I showed up for the seminar for that.
That's basic. It's basic as hell.
And but that's what he does.
And it works. That's insane.
I think it's funny.
I, by the by the way, Google Isaac Freeman, very good looking young stylish black dude, this guy's got it all.
This guy's got it all.
This guy's if he just becomes an astronaut, he's basically the modern day James Bond.
Oh, man, he's got like cool glasses and a jawline.
Yeah. Get him over.
You said you had a bunch of exciting things.
You want to do? By the way, you know, we don't judge a book by its cover.
So like, you know, looks, looks do matter.
Let's be clear. We try not to judge people by their looks first.
But once we take a look at what you do, we then go take a look at how you look.
And it either is like a plus 100 or it's a minus 100.
It's a huge multiplier on my opinion of you and how much I'm going to remember you afterwards.
I will never forget this guy.
Yeah. Like if he were dorky looking, I'd be like, Yeah, makes sense.
Right. Check's out.
And then I see what he looks like.
And I'm like, Oh, right.
It's tough to be like looking at.
By the way, most people when they have an avatar as their Twitter profile, it's because they're goofy looking and the avatar is better looking than making me question everything.
Like there's a reason I have a cartoon profile picture.
All right, look at me.
If you're on YouTube, look at me.
This is why I have a cartoon profile picture.
Okay. That's the, that's the rule.
It's like when someone quotes you revenue, they would have said profit if they had it, right?
If somebody talks about users, they would have quoted revenue if they had it.
Normally, if somebody's got the looks, they're going to put their face as the profile picture.
This guy defies all convention.
I asked someone what the revenue was recently.
And they were like, eight figures.
If you include the dot 00.
That's pretty funny.
That was pretty good.
All right, a quick break.
I know that if you're listening to my first million, that means you love numbers.
Well, I've got a new podcast called money wise.
And the premise is simple.
We talked to high net worth people.
So people who have somewhere between 50 to $500 million.
And we start with simple premise, which is tell me exactly how much money you have, how much money you make every month, what your portfolio looks like, how much money you spend every month, and every other bit of information that involves your net worth and your spending.
And the reason we do this is because I want to demystify money.
So we just had this woman named Anne, who has a 94 million dollar portfolio after selling her business.
And she spends $360 ,000 a month that she talks about where the money is, and what she spends it on, and why she spends that much.
And if it makes her happy or not, and then we dive deep on different topics like children, buying versus renting, giving money away, we basically are having a conversation that I see a lot of rich people having behind closed doors, we do it publicly.
So check it out. It's called money wise.
And you can find it wherever you get your podcasts.
You want to do another thing?
Yeah, all right. I got some cool stuff.
Oh, you got to do this poly market whale.
Okay, yeah, this is all right.
So this is the Billy of the week cue the music.
Million dollars isn't cool.
You know, it's cool.
A billion dollars. So you've heard the story, I think, but can I just explain a little bit of the detail here?
Amazing. I read, I read about it a little bit.
Do do we even know who this person is?
Yeah, so the election was happening, what 10 days ago or so.
And the big news was sort of, I guess, like there's a battle going on.
There's Republicans versus Democrats.
Great. There's Trump and Kamala.
Great. They were supposed to be dead.
But there was, there was an undercard to the pay per view.
And so who was the undercard?
Okay, if Trump and Kamala are the main event, then I think the undercard a lot of it was like, mainstream media versus social media, right?
You had like, Twitter and blogs versus MSNBC and whatever.
And they were, they were giving you different narratives, right?
And so, you know, Trump and Vance go on Joe Rogan, Kamala goes on Saturday Night Live, and you know, The View or 60 Minutes or like, you know, these like traditional media.
So that was one battle that was going on.
By the way, who would have thought, like you seen like Theo Vaughn, being like a needle mover.
Insane, right? I was saying this the other day, I think that going on Theo Vaughn needs to be part of the national standard for an election.
Like, I need to know if my president's going to be a good hang or not.
And I think Theo is the one who could save us there.
Yeah, that was insane.
So under that, then you have like the billionaire backers, you got Elon on one side, you got more Cuban on the other.
And it's like they're going around, they're promoting, they're using their money and their voice to do it.
What was the other battles?
One of the other battles was polls versus crypto prediction markets.
So the polls were telling a story at the time.
Pre -election, the polls were saying, razor thin margin, toss up these swing states too close to call.
It's a 50 -50 election right now.
Like we don't, it is too hard to tell who's going to win.
And the prediction markets, which were people betting money were saying something different.
They were saying 65 -35 Trump going to win.
And there are different things, right?
A poll is, you go out and you ask people who are you going to vote for.
A prediction market is who's going to get the most votes.
So they do tell different things, but the reality is still the same, which is that if the polls were accurate, that it was a 50 -50 toss up, it's going to be a razor thin margin, then the betting markets shouldn't have such a big spread.
There shouldn't be a big favorite versus a big underdog.
And what was the Poly market spread?
I think it was like 75 -25?
No, it was a little less.
It was about 63 Trump, but then it got to 65.
And then as the election started, when the news was saying, we're still too early, the odds were just jetting in Trump's direction.
They knew earlier than the exit polls or the news was willing to report about how much of a landslide this was going to be for Trump, which it was.
So before it happened, there was a question of like, is the prediction market actually predictive?
And there was some legitimate skepticism.
So the pro side was - You mean the betting market versus the poll market?
The betting - Even just alone, should we care what Poly market says?
Poly Market being the platform where you could take these markets.
Exactly. And so the plus side would be to say, well, these are people betting their own money, so skin in the game.
And so if you see a lot more action coming in on one side, that means the wisdom of the crowds and the actual free market believes the odds are this.
And that might be better than just the polls where people say, they're just saying what they're going to vote for and it's a small sample, but who knows?
Maybe they're lying.
Maybe it's just too small of a sample to know.
Maybe it's not indicative of - There's no skin in the game there.
So on one hand, you said skin in the game.
On the other hand, you would say, Poly Market, never heard of it, banned in the US.
So all the betting action was from international.
So over $3 billion was bet on the election.
None of this was Americans because you can't use Poly Market in America.
Then it's also crypto holders.
Because Poly Market is a crypto betting thing.
So you're like, oh, maybe there's a bias.
Crypto holders are more libertarian.
Maybe they're going to go more right -leaning.
And so it's what they want.
And Trump's pro -crypto.
So it was like maybe they're voting on what they wish for and not what it actually is.
Okay. So there were some question marks.
Then there was one more.
Then the news came out and said, we can't trust Poly Market because it's manipulated.
Manipulated how? Well, it's manipulated because a couple of whales are betting heavily on Trump and that's swinging the odds.
So it's actually, there's not what the crowds think.
It's really a couple of whales that are influencing this and they saw that - And you can see on Poly Market the size of bet.
Oh, someone just put this million dollar bet in.
I can go on Poly Market right now and look at the top 10 bettors and what they are bet on, how much volume they've bet this year, and how much their P &L is.
Are they up or down?
So Theo 4, I think, is the biggest one on the platform and he has made a profit of $22 million this year.
Exactly. So that's one user.
But you can go user by user and you can see, oh, this guy's just betting on everything or this guy's one huge bet or whatever.
So you can go look at any betters P &L on Poly Market.
So what they found was they were like, hey, there's a couple of bets here that were in the tens of millions on Trump.
And actually, it all came from the same guy.
And what they were thinking was that there's four big accounts that bet 28 million.
And actually, it turns out now after the fact the guy came out and said it, he had 11 accounts and he bet 40 something million and he, 40 or 50 million and he made about $80 million of profit, actually.
Sorry, I don't know the exact bet amounts, but I know he made $80 million profit in the end.
A French guy, I think.
A French guy. So they're like, who is this French whale?
And the story behind it's pretty interesting because this guy was a trader.
He's like, he's taking finance.
He lived in the US at one point.
But basically, he's like, I'm trying to remain anonymous.
By the way, how on earth would a journalist find this person?
That seems really hard.
That's a great scoop.
So on Poly Market, you could see the bets.
So you can go see, wow, there's a huge bet.
Then you go look at the account, you try to figure out whose wallet is this.
And because crypto is, there's a public ledger, you can actually trace back and try to find it.
And there's a company called Chainalysis.
Do you know Chainalysis?
I've heard of it just like as a headline.
They're basically, the government goes to Chainalysis and says, we need to know who owns this wallet.
And they can go and do the forensic analysis of every transaction that wallets done and tries to figure out the root wallet and who owns that wallet.
And so that's, and this is like a $10 billion company, Chainalysis.
We have to do a breakdown of this company.
This sounds fun. Yeah, they're a fascinating company.
And so they came out and they did this analysis.
And there's this web of the accounts and like...
Dude, this is like all the best stuff.
Like crime and crypto stories are the best stories.
And so working at this company would be super exciting.
So I know, but you know what I mean.
Totally. So they come out and they say, all right, well, dude, how did you know?
Why did you make such a massive bet on Trump?
And this is where the story gets really interesting.
He says, he's like, I didn't trust the polls, but I trust polling.
What do you mean? He goes, I commissioned my own polls.
There's a French guy who commissioned polls in America to inform his own bet.
And what he did was he paid a polling company.
And he said, I want you to go and I want you to ask them, but don't ask them who they vote, who they're going to vote for.
Because that's what polls often ask.
What do traditional polls ask?
Are you likely to vote?
If you're going to vote, who are you likely to vote for?
Are you certain of that?
You know, whatever.
Is there anything that's going to change your mind?
Well, and I think they also ask who do I think they ask it in a weird way as well.
I think they also ask who do you think your friend is going to vote for?
That's what this guy did.
Oh, this guy did was called the neighbor method.
And what he says is he says, don't ask them who they're going to vote for.
I don't want to, people are indirect and people don't want to reveal their own preferences.
But if you ask them a specific question, which is who do you expect your neighbor to vote for?
They will indirectly reveal their own preferences and what they believe is going to happen.
And he believed that the neighbor method is a more predictive method.
And when he did this, he commissioned this poll, he paid a major US pollster to go do these polls for him.
Just like, you know, the DNC and the RNC, they'll pay pollsters to go run their independent polls that they're not reporting to the public.
And he wanted him to measure this neighbor effect.
And what he found was that the results were, quote, mind blowing to the favor of Trump.
It showed a Trump landslide.
And so he thought now this is mispriced.
The media is telling you that this is 50 50 razor thin.
But actually, my polling is showing that actually, there's going to be a major landslide for Trump.
It's overwhelmingly in favor of Trump.
So now the bet is mispriced.
So he places this huge bet on Trump.
And it turns out he's correct.
And his final quote was, you know, public opinion would have been better prepared if the latest polls had measured using the neighbor effect.
And he specifically didn't just bet on the overall victory, he bet on specific swing states where he thought this people think this state is closer than it's actually going to be, it's going to be more in favor of Trump using this neighbor method, which is just insane.
And now of course, the French guy nailed it.
Two words. Bonjour.
Yeah. Fucking A. First of all, what I respect about this is everything go I don't respect everything about it.
I don't love I don't love gambling like this.
But people who have conviction on something like they do their own analysis.
And they're like, no, this is the answer.
Even though all the quote smart people or everyone's the establishment is saying this, but I did my own research.
And then that he did the big part, which is he bet $30 million or whatever of his own money.
I think that is like, those types of people fascinate me because that takes so much conviction.
Yeah, exactly. This is I mean, the guts that the brains and the guts right there.
And that's kind of I think the theme of the year is like, you see someone like Elon, who basically swings the election, who catches a rocket at, you know, catches a rocket with some chopsticks, you know, is working on self driving cars, helps cofound open AI, which is changing the world, the guys just,
you know, like firing on all cylinders.
And it's like, why?
What is it? What is different about this guy?
And it's the combination of the brain and the balls, right?
Like, there are other people as smart as Elon Musk, there are the people who have, you know, gut says Elon Musk, but the combination is rare.
And then you add on top of that, the willingness to, you know, absolutely work to the bone as well, right?
And then you add on top of that, like sacrifice your own life.
Yeah, so he's, you know, top point 1 % in like, five things.
And then it's like, oh, if you just multiply point 1 % times, you know, five times over and over again, you end up with like one in 10 billion, which is like, oh, that's actually the ratio, we do have one Elon out of the entire human population.
And I thought it was impressive.
I was like, Justin Timberlake, you can sing, dance and act and you're funny.
You know what I mean?
Super bad. Elon just really stepped it up.
It's a great call. Is Polymarket gonna sustain after this?
Of course not, right?
Okay, so I've been a big Polymarket fan.
I was using Polymarket before they banned it like, you know, way back in the day.
You're also a little bit of a D gen.
Yeah. But I think a lot of people are.
Okay. How much money have you and you?
First, by the way, you called this gambling, I don't believe that this is gambling, betting.
Well, like, for example, you own stock.
Do you believe that you're gambling when you buy a stock?
I guess what are you doing when you buy a stock?
Right? Like, yeah, you are, I guess, I guess you'd have to say that there's it's not as binary, but there's levels or like, it's a scale.
So but yeah, you are just like if you buy a car, Q and I, it exists on a spectrum.
Yes. So like, you know, the with a stock, the chair that you know, the the old fashioned way looking at is I'm not buying, I'm not gambling.
I'm buying a piece of ownership in a company that produces goods and for it's like, yeah, alright, cool.
Nobody really in practice treats it like that.
Meaning, you're not sitting there like, you know, you're not sitting there waiting for dividends.
You're not you're not trying to, you know, own this piece of this company, because you think it's gonna, you know, exit at a later date when it's a public stock already, right?
Like, you're basically saying, I believe that, you know, the future earnings of this company are going to be x and that that's why owning this is good, because the the share price is going to go up because their earnings are going to go up and they're maybe going to go up at a faster rate than the current
price of the earning current price of the stock indicates.
That's what you're supposed to buy, right?
You're supposed to buy a stock that you think is going to, you know, appreciate over time.
I think that Poly Market has the ability to do that in a bunch of interesting ways.
So first, there are the other speculation slash betting, gambling type of use cases.
So speculating on prices of things speculating on sports game, sports outcomes of games, right?
Like sports betting is obviously a huge deal.
So there's those use cases.
There is an interesting thing.
So I'm guessing you didn't read Vitalik's blog recently about about this.
That's an accurate guess.
Vitalik, who's the creator of Ethereum, wrote a great blog post.
Vitalik's one of my favorite entrepreneurs and thinkers on the planet.
So the blog post is called, I guess, from prediction markets into finance.
Info finance. So he's, he's like, you know, I have written a lot and I've supported Poly Market and many of you who know me might be surprised by this because Vitalik is sort of notoriously like, not into the like crypto casino side of life.
Like he's not price based.
He's not trying to get rich as like his primary motivation.
He's kind of like a prude.
He's a purist. And so like, it'd be like, why do you care so much about these like prediction markets, just people gambling?
Who cares? And he's like, because I don't see it as that, I actually think that there's another category here that's overlooked.
And it's called info, info finance, information finance.
And he gives some examples.
So he's like, Poly Market was two things at once.
He goes, on one hand, it's a betting site for the few people that want to bet and gamble.
But for the rest of us, we could look at how the gamblers are betting.
And that would, for them, it's served as a news site.
It was like, Oh, wow, Trump is doing better.
Trump is improving in the same way that the polls are supposed to be part of the news.
The prediction markets were actually better news information.
So it was information finance.
He's like, that's the first level, which was, even if you're not participating in the betting, trying to make a buck, it is very useful that other people are doing that because it's a new, it's another source of information.
He's like, it's not, it should not be the only source of information, but it should be another one.
He talks about the elections in Venezuela, how like, you know, basically, he was watching how people were protesting how it was getting manipulated and blah, blah, blah, how Poly Market was actually a very useful source of information for him.
And understanding what was going on in Venezuela from an informational point of view.
All right, so that was one.
Then he's like, okay, what's the other use case?
He's like, so imagine a company.
So like, you know, I don't know if you saw like Chipotle or Starbucks, like Starbucks just hired the Chipotle CEO.
Did you see that? Yeah.
And the headline is that he's working from home, even though he's making everyone else go back to work.
Right? Yeah. And he's like private jetting in and out.
But like this guy's kind of famous for like, he trims the menu, he cuts costs, and he basically improves margins.
That's what this guy's known for.
And so the amazing thing was that guy, he's that guy.
And so like, he's him when it comes to public markets, because when he switched teams, they paid him a bunch of money.
And I was like, wow, what a huge stock package for a CEO, like $100 million, whatever, whatever the number was.
But the stock jumped like $20 billion or something like it was like, I'm making up numbers here, because I didn't plan to talk about this.
But like the stock jumped in a disproportionate way, based on just the news that this guy was coming over.
And so like, it was a great trade for them to overpay this guy, this talent, because it immediately improved the overall value of the company, just the news of him joining.
And so Vitalik actually was like, just like there's today, we're looking at these as prediction markets, you could actually use this as a decision market, meaning a company or a group of people could set could basically, in the way that that guy, Theo, paid for a private poll to get information, you
could actually set up a prediction market and set a decision market and say, should we hire this CEO?
Or what will the share should be?
What will the share price be in six months if we hire Brian Nichols?
And if the share price expectation is really high, it tells you in advance without having to hire him yet, what the market reaction is going to be to making this decision.
Does that make sense?
And so you can actually create decision markets, and it would be worth basically paying to paying participants to go pick a side and make a bet in order to gather information that will help you make a better decision about what you're going to do.
And so he's like, there's, you can actually improve judgment if you were to, if you were to make this decision.
And so I thought that was pretty interesting.
And he talks about he goes through, you know, how this might how info finance might affect all these other things.
So for example, scientific peer review.
So right now in science, you submit a paper and he there's something called the replication crisis, which is that famous results that end up being, you know, go into books and in the news or whatever, then they can't be reproduced, that study can't be reproduced.
It's like, is it even like the definition of good science is that it's a reproducible experiment.
But that's not happening.
And in fact, there's not really a big incentive to go reproduce these because the incentive is come out with a new finding, you get published, you get the glory, you get the funding for your lab, spending your resources to reproduce somebody else's science, somebody else's big news.
It's not really a good use of time.
And he talks about how prediction markets could actually create incentives for people to go and try to reproduce these studies, because you can have people betting on if this is reproducible or not.
And so you would be able to profit off of knowing that this, this is going to be reproduced or not.
So it's pretty interesting to see how that might be applied in all these other ways.
I haven't read this other than what you just told me and skimming it here.
First of all, this is like an amazing blog post.
I need to go read this.
Second, if you go to his blog, if you go to his other posts, he publishes like in -depth posts every three days.
How amazing is this that we have access to a genius like this who just shares his thoughts.
And by the way, they're like, if you read just the headlines, and then click the articles, they are not just like half -assed blogs.
These are like in -depth things that he's publishing a shit ton.
How special of an era do we have where we can like go and just read his thoughts.
That's the access to this.
And the beautiful thing about his stuff, which is I think hard to because, you know, I was thinking about this with podcasts.
It's amazing now that there's podcasts with, you know, like when we started this, I felt like there was a slight differentiator in the business podcast space, because we were not just journalists, nor were we like never has been.
We had like done it, we had started many companies, succeeded, failed, and we had sold companies.
We had done real things.
And so that was kind of like a interesting, oh, what if you actually had a podcast from entrepreneurs who were actually like more successful than the average podcast, let's say.
I think you're looking for the term for us by us.
We foo -boot it. Yeah.
But now you have all in, you have now, you get to see billionaires doing this.
Reed Hoffman has a podcast.
You know, Zuck is going on podcasts, like who doesn't have a podcast at this point, right?
And I think that's really cool.
And the same thing is happening in sports.
athlete, current athletes, past athletes now have sports podcasts.
Whereas before the only sports podcast you get was like, you know, hardcore fan in his mom's basement, you know, ranting about his team, or, you know, a journalist.
And now you have this like, this third thing.
And the third thing is like somebody who's actually been there and done that who gives their perspective, not to say it's always better, but like, it's interesting that that's another good one, though.
accessible to us. Yeah.
But the problem with something like, let's say all in or other podcasts like that, is like, you have to always parse the agenda.
So it's like, wow, this guy's really bearish on nuclear and really pro solar that you go look into Shema's profile.
And it's like, Oh, wow, he's made like enormous bets on solar.
And like, that's, he's talking his book in a way, right?
And it's okay, it's okay to talk your book.
But it's, you have to constantly do that, like, underwriting yourself as a listener to be like, Are they, you know, what's the bias here?
Yeah, the beautiful thing about Vitalik is that the guy is such an uber nerd, that like, you can actually take him at face value.
And it's so nice to have somebody you could take a face value and other people might disagree.
I don't care. I take him at face value.
And I followed this guy for like, you know, eight years straight now.
And this guy's done nothing to make me think he's just trying to pump his bags.
In fact, he actively does things against his bags.
You know, not pumping Ethereum or talking about what where it lacks or what's slow about it.
And, you know, under promising what it's going to be.
And I think that that is, that's great that we've accessed this guy who is not trying to take something from us in the process.
That's a very good speech on this guy.
I'm gonna like, I don't even think you could subscribe to his blog.
Like, I don't, there's not even an email form, dude, his blog, like so he publishes Alright, so listen, October 29, October 26, October 23, October 20.
He's been writing these posts a lot.
And those posts that I just said I just put them into a word counter.
One of them was 6000 words.
Now, I don't know, like, I don't know how Bitcoin dramatic look you just gave me when you said that, like I was supposed to like, audibly gasp.
Dude, that's so much work.
I've written a lot of blog posts, a 6000 word blog post would take me 40 hours probably, right?
It's so much work with you.
When you are this guy and you create Ethereum, is it one of the things where like, you've created it and you can now walk away?
Or does it like is it like a house and you got to like maintain it?
No, he's actively working on it.
Like, I don't like it, but like, yeah, he's, he's actively dedicated it like, you got to like, re roof it every once in a while.
I don't know how these things work like Ethereum.
I don't know, like, did you just, Ethereum was like a 10 year roadmap.
And so he's just, it's not even like re roofing it.
It's like, building a hotel, one floor at a time and people are staying in the hotel.
But you told them from the beginning, this is a 50 story hotel.
And I haven't even built all those other things that we're going to need in order for this to work.
Like there's no elevators yet.
I know, we're going to make elevators for now we take the stairs.
That's like transaction fees and all that.
The reason I'm asking is how on earth is he writing this much stuff while doing like a full time job?
Because Ethereum doesn't work like that.
It's not like he's sitting there coding all day or managing people.
Like it's not a company.
It's like a nonprofit foundation, open source project of which he's like a steward and a champion, but he's not like he doesn't have like 25 direct reports.
You know what I mean?
Does he have a girlfriend or wife yet?
I'm not sure I've seen a bunch of pictures, but it's so hard with him to tell what's a meme and what's like reality because he's like so memeable that like when Bitcoin, when Ethereum price goes down and then they posted him pictures of him, they're like, goddamn it.
It's because he has a girlfriend.
By the way, it's like, it's his girlfriend just going to be like, which way is it going to go?
So it's November 13th.
We're recording this exactly one month ago.
I came on this podcast and I said, Sam, can I give you my one minute case for Bitcoin and you literally rolled your eyes and audibly groaned at me and said, haven't you already done that?
Are you talking about why you like Bitcoin again?
I just want to say the price is up 47 % since I did that rant.
All right. Well, are you like that French dude?
Are you the French guy?
Did you, were you smart or just, or were you smart and ballsy or just...
Go back and listen to it.
It's in the episode called Did the creator of Bitcoin Get Unmasked at the 30 minute mark.
30 minutes and 20 seconds.
No, I'm not debating if you said that.
I'm saying, did you make your own...
I was saying, go listen to the case and say, did I get lucky or was I smart?
Did I have a reason?
No, that's not what I'm asking.
What I'm asking is, did you make the bet?
Well, of course. What do you mean?
What I'm saying is, did you just say it was going to be good or did you actually invest your own money into it?
Dude, I'm polymarket, bro.
I was skinning the game.
Does gambling on polymarket mean you have Bitcoin?
Well, it's like polymarket versus a poll.
A poll is just saying what you're going to do.
Oh, got it. Polymarket is putting your money up saying what you think is going to actually happen.
I put my money up and thought what I said, what I thought was going to happen.
Yeah, I mean, it's had a hell of a run.
Almost as good as Palantir.
Everything's fucking crazy right now though.
Like everything... Everything's a little too crazy.
Everything's too crazy.
Like it wouldn't be, I don't know anything about anything, but it seems like it'd be a good time to make the opposite prediction.
So yeah, you were right.
It's just like, how long are you going to be right for right now?
Everything is just insane.
Yeah, yeah. And of course, these are like one month fluctuations or nothing, but I guess the reason I thought it was bullish was because it was the same reason that the thing is pumping right now.
Because there was a whole bunch of like big things.
Like for example, that the government was going to be pro Bitcoin, which was always the biggest risk of Bitcoin was like, oh, even if it's, even if you're right about the technology being better, the government will never allow this.
And I was like, dude, the guy who's going to become president is saying, not only will he allow it, he's bought and sold by the crypto donors now and both sides are.
And I don't know if you saw like the Congress and like the whatever house representative Senate, all that shit.
There's like a 140 pro crypto people now like in active government, which is like, that number was zero seven years ago.
And I just felt like these things were not priced in properly.
Now they're talking about a Bitcoin strategic reserve for the country itself.
These things, once you go in, it's almost impossible to unwind these things.
And I just thought that when a top two or three risk gets de -risked, that should change your underwriting on the price.
And I thought that that wasn't happening.
For some reason, the price was flat, and people weren't paying attention to that one fact.
What a world. So in summary, I was right.
Thank you. You were right.
You absolutely were right.
Everything is insane at the moment.
I hope your prediction will be true for many, many, many more months and many more years, but it's definitely making me nervous at the moment.
Everything is insane.
Is that where we end?
That's where we end.
It's been a fantastic podcast to Martha Stewart, to Bitcoin, to the poly market whale.
That's called Thank you for your service.
Hot, hot heat. The hot, hot heat was served.
You're welcome. Alright, that's it.
That's the pod. I want to, I put my all in it like the days off.
On the road, let's travel, never looking back.
