Six Minute English from bbclearningenglish.com
Hello, this is 6 Minute English from BBC Learning English.
I'm Neil.
And I'm Pippa.
Sharing your Netflix password, lying about your age or not paying the bus fare are a few examples of cheating in daily life.
But there's one place where cheating is usually considered wrong and that's sport.
Cheating in sport through the use of performance-enhancing drugs, informally called doping, is normally considered wrong.
Just ask American cycling legend Lance Armstrong, who is thrown out of the sport for using banned substances.
But earlier this year, a sporting event took place which turned the debate about drugs in sport upside down.
Here's Asma Khalid from BBC World Service's The Global Story to explain.
This weekend, elite athletes from around the world are descending on Las Vegas, Nevada for the first of its kind sporting competition known as the enhanced games.
Kind of like the Olympics, but only for swimming, sprinting, and weightlifting.
The aim is to break world records.
In fact, some of these competitors are former Olympians, medalists, battling it out for money and glory.
But there's one big difference.
The big difference is that the enhanced games allow athletes to use performance-enhancing drugs that are banned in professional sports.
In these games, nicknamed the Doping Olympics, steroids, growth hormones and stimulants are all OK. You're a big sports fan, Neil.
Would you enjoy watching a sport where the athletes have taken drugs?
No I wouldn't.
I really don't think that's fair.
I think we need to know that all the athletes start and compete from the same level.
Yeah, I guess that makes sense.
I don't really watch that many sports, so I guess I wouldn't notice the difference.
But if you're really into sport, you care about the rules, right?
Yes, absolutely.
And in this episode, we'll dive into the controversial world of the enhanced games, learning some useful new words and phrases along the way.
And remember you'll find all the vocabulary plus a quiz
But now I have a question for you, Neil.
You mentioned the famous sporting cheat Lance Armstrong.
But how many times did Lance Armstrong win the famous race, the Tour de France, before he was finally caught out?
Was it A, 5, B, 6 or C, 7?
Ooh, well, it was a lot, so I think I'll go for C7.
Well, we'll find out the answer at the end of the programme.
Now, it's no exaggeration to say that the enhanced games are controversial.
After all, organisations like the World Anti-Doping Agency have spent decades fighting performance-enhancing drugs and sport.
Here's BBC Sports editor Dan Rowan on World Service programme The Global Story.
I think it's fair to say it's one of the most divisive and controversial events that the world of sport has seen for a long time.
It's an event where performance-enhancing drugs banned elsewhere in mainstream sport, of course, are actually allowed to be taken by the competitors under medical supervision.
Dan Rowan says it's fair to say the enhanced games are controversial.
He uses the phrase it's fair to say to introduce a statement that he considers to be balanced and reasonable, that the games are controversial.
Dan also describes the games as divisive, an adjective that means causing a lot of disagreement between people.
Much of this disagreement is about the use of performance enhancing drugs themselves.
The Games organisers point out that all drugs are approved by the US Food and Drug Agency and taken openly under medical supervision, which they say makes them safer than when they are taken secretly at competitions elsewhere.
But there are many critics too, as Dan Rowan outlined to BBC World Service's The Global Story.
But the critics, of course, say that this crosses an ethical line, that it sets a dreadful example because it risks normalising doping.
It could harm the integrity, therefore, of sport and it could be dangerous to the health of those taking part.
For the Games critics, doping crosses an ethical line.
The phrase to cross the line means to start behaving in a way that's not socially acceptable.
These critics say the games set a bad example, meaning that they encourage others to behave badly as well.
Why's that, Pippa?
Well, it's because critics argue the games normalise the use of performance drugs in sport.
If you normalise something, you treat it as normal or acceptable, when previously it wasn't.
But with arguments strongly held on both sides, the debate is far from over.
So Neil, have you changed your opinion after hearing both sides of the story?
No, I haven't.
I think it's just not fair.
And I think if you're not fair in sport, what's the point?
Well, let's hear the answer to my quiz question, Neil.
I asked you how many times Lance Armstrong won the Tour de France and it was C, seven times consecutively between 1999 and 2005.
Of course, we now know that there were performance enhancing drugs involved.
OK, so now it's time to recap the vocabulary we've learned starting with doping – using banned drugs to perform better in sporting competitions.
You can use the phrase, it's fair to say, to introduce a statement you consider to be balanced, reasonable or true.
If something is divisive, it causes disagreement between people.
The idiom cross the line means to start behaving in an unacceptable way.
If you set a bad example, you behave in a way that encourages others to behave badly.
And finally, to normalise something means to treat it as normal or acceptable when previously it wasn't.
OK, once again our six minutes are up, but if you'd like to practice more, you'll find a quiz and worksheet on our website, bbclearningenglish.com.
See you again soon, but for now, it's goodbye.
Bye.
